cpac meeting 4-18-06

33
Program Overview Program Overview

Upload: harttwi

Post on 22-May-2015

358 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Program OverviewProgram Overview

Page 2: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Our Goal is to …Our Goal is to …

• Clean the sanitary sewage and return it to the river

• Send the rain water to the river

• Minimize the mixing of the two

Page 3: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

EPA Consent DecreeEPA Consent Decree• Agreement between City and

the U.S. EPA

• This agreement is the resolution of an 11-year-old lawsuit

• More than 400 cities nationwide are under similar orders

• Approved by voters in July 2002

• Stiff penalties for missed deadlines

Page 4: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

EPA Consent Decree EPA Consent Decree costscosts• Estimated at more than $450 million over a

15-year period

• Front-end loaded

• Largest capital projects occur in the first several years

Page 5: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Consent Decree Consent Decree RequirementsRequirements• The Consent Decree requires the following:

• Improvements to the WWTP

• Now under construction

• Control of sanitary sewer overflows

• Nearly complete

• Final phase of Point Place work

• Completing retention basin in River Road Park• Development and implementation of a Long Term

Control Plan for Combined Sewer Overflows (LTCP)

Page 6: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Consent Decree Consent Decree ImplementationImplementation

• WWTP improvements• 11 major projects• $140 million

• Sanitary Sewer Overflow Control• 13 major projects• $35 million

• Combined Sewer Overflow Control• 26 projects (planned)• Over $250 million (proposed)

Page 7: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

WWTP ConstructionWWTP Construction

Page 8: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

SSO Control ProjectsSSO Control Projects

Page 9: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

CSO Long Term Control CSO Long Term Control PlanPlan

• Culmination of over two years of study

• Involved the public and stakeholders along the way

Page 10: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

ObligationsObligations

• The consent decree requires that the LTCP evaluate a range of CSO control alternatives based on:• Pollution reduction benefits• Instream water quality conditions• Construction and operations costs

• The consent decree requires that work included in the plan be completed by August 31, 2016

Page 11: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Public Input for PlanPublic Input for Plan

• Public input included:• 2 community telephone surveys• 6 public meetings• 17 Community Program Advisory Committee

meetings devoted to the Long Term Control Plan

Page 12: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

City’s Combined AreaCity’s Combined Area

Page 13: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Existing ConditionsExisting Conditions

• Currently 32 overflows

• 17 square miles of CSO area

• Discharge 33 times per year

• Discharge 625 million gallons per year

Page 14: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

CSO Control Work has been CSO Control Work has been PerformedPerformed

• The City constructed three major tunnel systems to store excess flow

• The City has implemented a number of sewer separation projects to build separate sewer systems

Page 15: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

CSO Area to TunnelsCSO Area to Tunnels

Page 16: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Sewer Separation Sewer Separation ProjectsProjects

Page 17: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Alternatives ConsideredAlternatives Considered

• Flow storage and/or treatment• Storage basins and tunnels with screening and other

treatment capability

• Sewer Separation• Construction of new sewers for eliminating

combined systems

• Flow reduction/rerouting• Small-scale measures to reduce the amount of flow

to the sewer system

Page 18: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Proposed PlanProposed Plan

• Reduces number of overflow locations from 32 to 23

• Reduces frequency from 33 to 4 (untreated)

• Reduces volume from 624 MG/year to 69 MG/year

• Reduces typical pollutant discharge by 86%-89%

• Reduces bacterial discharge by 90%

Page 19: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Proposed PlanProposed Plan

• Includes 26 projects• Estimated cost of over $250M (2005 dollars)• Reduces Ottawa River discharge to 2 times/

year• Reduces Maumee River discharge to 4 times/

year• Reduces Swan Creek discharge frequency to 3

times/year, disinfects the discharge that does occur

Page 20: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Expected Facility LocationsExpected Facility Locations

• Storage Basins• Joe E. Brown Park OR Windermere Blvd.• I – 280 / Front Street interchange area• Private property at Oakdale and Miami• City property next to I-75 on north side of Maumee

River

• Storage Pipelines• International Park• Adjacent to Jamie Farr Park

Page 21: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Plan for Ottawa RiverPlan for Ottawa River

Page 22: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Plan for Maumee River Plan for Maumee River (Upper)(Upper)

Page 23: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Plan for Maumee River Plan for Maumee River (Lower)(Lower)

Page 24: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Plan for Swan CreekPlan for Swan Creek

Page 25: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Facility LocationsFacility Locations

Page 26: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Sewer Separation/ Flow Sewer Separation/ Flow Reduction AreasReduction Areas

Page 27: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Implementation Time FrameImplementation Time Frame

• Ottawa River: 2006 – 2015

• Maumee River: 2006 – 2016

• Swan Creek: 2007 – 2016

Page 28: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Storage Basin ExamplesStorage Basin Examples

• Vast majority of work is below ground

• Will require above-ground building for support facilities

• Takes about 2 - 3 years to construct

Birmingham CSO basinBirmingham CSO basin

Leib Screening/ Disinfection Leib Screening/ Disinfection Facility - DetroitFacility - Detroit

Page 29: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Storage PipelineStorage Pipeline

• Essentially large sewer underground that will provide storage volume

• Small support building required in vicinity

• Takes 1 – 2 years for construction

Page 30: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Tunnel ImprovementsTunnel Improvements

• Improve tunnel hydraulics to reduce frequency

• Reduce flow area (Swan Creek South)

• Improve cleaning, other operations items

• Add disinfection capability

Page 31: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Project CostsProject Costs

• All costs are based on 2005 cost index

• Actual costs at implementation will be impacted by the rate of inflation and the final project design

• Estimated overall cost: >$250 million

• Rates will be impacted by timing of projects and financing method uses

Page 32: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

What is Next?What is Next?

• Plan was submitted to U.S. EPA

• Waiting for EPA approval

Page 33: CPAC Meeting 4-18-06

Next MeetingNext Meeting

• Date