good - campus improvement plan 2011-2012

8/3/2019 Good - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012

1/14

C-FBISD VISION:

All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advancedlevel and graduate college-ready and/or workforce ready without remediation.

R.E. GOOD INTERNATIONAL BACCALAUREATE WORLD SCHOOLCAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN

2011-2012

Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District

Leslie ConeyPrincipal


2/14

BOARD OF TRUSTEESNancy Cline, President

James Goode, Vice PresidentRichard Fleming, Secretary

Lynn Chaffin, Assistant SecretaryFrank Shor, Board Member

Nancy Watten, Board MemberKarin Webb, Board Member

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCHSCHOOLS

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLSCreekview

Early CollegeNewman Smith

R. L. TurnerRanchview

MIDDLE SCHOOLS

BlalackBushFieldLongPerryPolk

SUPPORTING OBJECTIVESSupporting Objective 1:

Continuously increase student achievement

Supporting Objective 2:Continuously improve the learning environment for

students and staff

Supporting Objective 3:Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Supporting Objective 4:Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and

support of our school system

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLSBlair

BlantonCarrollton

CentralCountry Place

DavisFarmers Branch

FreemanFurneaux

GoodKent

LandryLas Colinas

La VillitaMcCoy

McKamyMcLaughlinMcWhorterRainwaterRiverchaseRosemeade

Sheffield IntermediateSheffield Primary

StarkStricklandThompson

CENTERSMary Grimes Education Center

Salazar Transition SchoolKelly Pre-K Center

Huie Education CenterCLC Learning Complex

C-FBISD GOALThe Goal of the Carrollton-FarmersBranch ISD is high achievement forall students.

2


3/14

3

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVESBUSINESS/COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES

PARENT REPRESENTATIVESTara HrbacekKelley Ervin

Dionne Smith

ADMINISTRATORSLeslie ConeyJulie Rodriguez

STAFF REPRESENTATIVESJulie HarrisEva CrawfordElisa OteroJessica SeayDaniel QuintanaShelley Justice

Beverly Phillips

CAMPUS PLAN REVIEW :

Chair Signature Date Chair Signature Date

Chair Signature Date Chair Signature Date


4/14

4

C-FBISD VISION

All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments ofAcademic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advancedlevel and graduate college-ready and/or workforce readywithout remediation.

MISSIONTogether with families and community we commit all districtresources to guide the learning of each student to graduate as:

A responsible individual A passionate life-long learner A complex thinker An effective communicator

STATEMENT OF BELIEFSWe believe that:

The economic, political and societal success of ourcountry depends upon a quality education for all.

Diversity strengthens the community and enriches thefabric of our society.

It is the responsibility of the entire community topartner in the educational process.

Learning occurs best in a safe, orderly and nurturingenvironment.

Belonging to a family, to a school and to a communityis vital, and this sense of belonging advances learning.

People learn at different rates, have differentcapacities and that each persons educational pathdeserves to be valued equally.

Learning empowers people to reach their fullpotential: physically, mentally, socially, andemotionally

Everyone is a teacher, everyone is a learner.

GRADUATE PROFILEGraduates of the Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD are:

Responsible individuals who: Model productive citizenship Practice successful personal management Demonstrate character values and ethical behavior Appreciate the value of diversity Function effectively as team members

Competent learners who: Continually pursue and integrate knowledge Achieve academic standards Apply various forms of technology Seek educational and career options Produce quality products

Complex thinkers who: Solve problems critically Create original ideas and solutions Understand and apply systems thinking

Effective communicators who: Read with understanding Interpret information Interact through listening and speaking Write clearly


5/14

5

TARGET AREASTitle I Targeted Assisted (TA)Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program

TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standardsTA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planningTA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based researchTA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programsTA 5. Highly qualified teachersTA 6. Professional DevelopmentTA 7. Increase parental involvementTA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I School-wide Components (TS)TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessmentTS 2. School-wide reform strategiesTS 3. Highly qualified teachers

TS 4. Professional developmentTS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high-need schoolsTS 6. Parental involvementTS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programsTS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessments.TS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basisTS 10. Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services.


6/14

6

THE GOAL OF THE CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD IS HIGH ACH IEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTSSUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 1 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 2 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 3 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 4

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STUDENTACHIEVEMENTCONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THELEARNING ENVIRONMENT FORSTUDENTS AND STAFF

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASEOPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESSCONTINUOUSLY INCREASESTAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE ANDSUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM

Performance Targets:

Academic Performance Index (API)

STAAR Satisfactory STAAR Advanced

Recognized/Exemplary DistinctionDesignationsAYP


Employee

Job Satisfaction Campus Environment Curriculum and Instruction

Student:

Attendance Rate Disciplinary Placements


Staff Productivity Index (SPI)


Education Productivity Index (EPI)

API SPI

Parent Satisfaction

Employee

Campus Communications

HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS


7/14

THE GOAL OF THE CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD IS HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTSSUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 1 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 2 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 3 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 4

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STUDENTACHIEVEMENT CONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THE LEARNINGENVIRONMENT FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE OPERATIONALEFFECTIVENESSCONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STAKEHOLDERCONFIDENCE AND SUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOLSYSTEM

7

Supporting Objective 1 Continuously increase student achievementPerformance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR Satisfactory; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations; AYP

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENT

Provide acceleration for students identified as AtRisk

Janine Drake (IF)Norma Rendon (Part-time Title I teacher)Monica Martinez (Part-time Title I aide)Classroom teachers

Ongoing throughout theyear

BenchmarksRunning RecordsTutoring LogsRTI LogsCommon AssessmentsStudent Work

COL

LLI Kits

ComprehensionToolkits

Navigator andOrigo

Teacher madealigned materials

Accelerated Ed

funds:$51,260.44

1,2,3,4,8,9,10

Monitor student fitness through the Fitness GramProvide state-mandated physical activity minutesthrough PE classes and CATCH

Melissa King (PE)Student NutritionClassroom Teachers


Increased studentachievement

Students in healthy range forBMI and fitness

CATCH materials

PE equipment2,9

Utilize Instructional Specialists and Coaches toeffectively implement the curriculum

SpecialistsCoachesAdministrators

Throughout the year

Benchmarks

Running Records

Tutoring Logs

RTI Logs

Common Assessments

Student Work

Title I Funds:$57,259.48

2,4,5,8,9

Hold Kindergarten Round-Up in April 2012 to

facilitate the transition between PreK andKindergarten

Administrators

TeachersCounselor

April 2012

Agendas

HandoutsParent Evaluation Forms

Teacher

preparedmaterials

6,7


8/14



8

Supporting Objective 1 Continuously increase student achievementPerformance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR - Advanced; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations


Employ Strategic/Higher Order Questioningthroughout the curriculum

ClassroomteachersAdministratorsCoaches


Strategic and Higher Orderquestions embedded in

lessons (documented inwalk-throughs and teacherstaping themselves)

Teachers will reflect anddebrief with Administratorsand Coaches

Relevant

articles andresearch

Training duringPLCs

2,4,9

Utilize iPads to enhace instruction. Apps teachers willuse with students include:

o Read Aloudso Read Along books geared for each childs

reading levelo Phonics and handwriting reinforcemento Number sense and problem solving

reinforcemento Virtual science experimentso Virtual planetariumo Virtual field trips to museums, other

countries, etc.o Technology skills

Teachers will use their iPads for their ownprofessional development by regularly videoing theirinstruction with special emphasis on elevatingclassroom discourse. Reflections on these videos willserve as a basis for discussion between teachers andadministrators/coaches/specialists

Classroomteachers


Increased academicachievement(Benchmarks, commonassessments, Universal

Screening, DRA)

iPads forteachersClassroom setof iPads forcheckout

Title IResources:$32, 430

2,4,9,10


9/14



9

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffPerformance Target: Employee: Job Satisfaction I would recommend this campus to a friend as a good place to work.

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTForm and maintain a Faculty Advisory Committee

meetings Leslie Coney Monthly meetings

At least 97% of staff willagree or strongly agree

on Employee OpinionSurvey

Time 5,8

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffPerformance Target: Employee: Campus Environment I would characterize my campus as having a positive attitude.

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINEEVALUATION/

MEASURE RESOURCESTITLE I

COMPONENT

Form and maintain a Sunshine Committee

Jennifer Anderson(chairperson)Representatives fromeach grade level

Committee will recognizelife-cycle events, and planothercelebrations/activities topromote staff cohesionthroughout the year

At least 98% of staff willagree or strongly agreeon Employee OpinionSurvey

Sunshine Dues 5


10/14



10

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffPerformance Target: Employee: Curriculum and Instruction Teachers work amicably together on common problems.


Participation by teachers in PLCs

Leslie ConeyJulie RodriguezCassandra HatfieldAna WintonClassroom Teachers

Math and Literacy PLCsfacilitated by Specialists

on assigned Tuesdays

PLCs facilitated byclassroom teachers onother Tuesdays

PLCs on Wednesdayafternoons facilitated bycampus administration

Meeting agendas andminutes

Learning from PLCsevidenced in classroom(walk-throughs byadministrators/Specialists)

Teachers able to accuratelyreflect on own instruction(tape themselves andprovide feedback)

Planning timesdevoted solely to

PLCs

Books andresearch onrelevant topicsCOL/UBD

Title I Resources:$1,000

2,4,5,8,9

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffPerformance Target: Student: Attendance Rate


Provide rewards to recognize student attendance

Classroom teachers

Debbie Inman(IncentiveCommitteeChairperson)

Awards given at end ofeach Nine Weeks andat the end of the year

Attendance rate willincrease

Attendance

buttons,pencils,stickers,certificates

9

Monitor and make personal contact with parents Classroom teachers

Teachers will contactthe parents via phone oremail when a student isabsent more than twoconsecutive days or has

a pattern of absences

Attendance rate willincrease

Time 6,9


11/14



11

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffPerformance Target: Student: Disciplinary Placements


Model PYP Learner Profile Classroom TeachersOngoing throughout theyear

Office referrals reduced

Students use Learner

Profile language whenidentifying behaviors

Increase in positivecomments made byparents in PYP BehaviorFolders

Time

PYP Curriculum2,6,9

Implement R Time Classroom TeachersCounselorOngoing throughout theyear

Office referrals reduced

Students model R Timestrategies across thecurriculum

R TimeMaterials 2,9

Supporting Objective 3 Continuously increase operational effectivenessPerformance Target: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE

TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE

RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENT

Utilize a floating PLC/Planning Period foradditional professional development time

Classroom TeachersAdministrators

Throughout the year;each grade level willhave an extra PLCperiod every 8 days

Benchmarks

Running Records

Tutoring Logs

RTI Logs

Common Assessments

Student Work

Time for FloatingPLC each 8 daysArticles andresearch onrelevant topicsCOL/UBD

2,4,5,8,9


12/14



12

Supporting Objective 4 Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemPerformance Target: Education Productivity Index (EPI); API; SPI

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTShare ERG results and goals with stakeholders atPTA meeting and through newsletters

AdministratorsOngoing throughout theyear

Stakeholders understandERG system

Time 6

Supporting Objective 4 Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemPerformance Target: Parent Satisfaction

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTRecruit and encourage parents in leadership roles(CIC,PTA)

AdministratorsClassroom teacher


Increase in number anddiversity of parents in

leadership roles

Time 6

Provide trainings that are meaningful to parentsAdministratorsDistrict ParentEducators

Minimum of two parenttrainings per semester

Increase in attendanceand positive feedback ofsessions

TimeMaterials

Title IResources:$2,325.07

6

Supporting Objective 4 Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemPerformance Target: Employee: Campus Communication School has system of communication thats open, regular and honest

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTCommunicate with parents via:Weekly Tuesday Newsday foldersPhone shout outs

MarqueeTeacher newsletters

AdministratorsClassroom teachers


Increase in ParentSatisfaction Survey

Time 6


13/14



13

ERG Performance Index 2010 Rank 2011Target 2011 Rank 2012Target 2012 RankEducation Productivity Index(EPI)

17 12 10

Academic Performance Index(API)

35 30 25

Staff Productivity Index (SPI) 38 30 28

Employee Opinion Survey 2011Result 2012Target 2012ResultEmployee Job Satisfaction I wouldrecommend this campus to a friend as a

good place to work.96 97

Employee Campus Environment I wouldcharacterize my campus as having a

positive atmosphere.97 98

Employee Curriculum and Instruction

Support Teachers work amicably togetheron common problems.

100 100

Employee Campus Communication School has system of communication thats

open, regular and honest.

93 94

AEIS 2011 Result 2012Target 2012ResultCampus Rating Recognized Exemplary

Student Attendance Rate 98.7 98.8Students with Disciplinary Placements 4 1

Achieving Quality Together (Parent Survey) 2011Result 2012Target 2012ResultVery Satisfied or Satisfied with District 91 92

RESULTS - 2012PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS# of Targets Met

# of Targets Not Met

Percent at Target

ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP)C-FBISD Met AYP

2008 Yes

2009 Yes

2010 Yes

2011 Yes

Target 2012 Yes

Results 2012


14/14



14

Supporting Objective 1 Continuously increase student achievementREADING/ELA

READING/ELA 2011 2012 2011 2012

Student Group % PASS% SATIS

% COM% ADV

Target Result Target Result

Afr. American 100 80 55 30

Hispanic 89 75 29 20

White 96 80 48 40

Econ. Dis. 89 75 29 20LEP 81 70 26 20

G/T 100 100 100 100

Special Ed 89 70 22 15

All Students 91 75 34 25

WRITINGWRITING 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV


Afr. American * 80 30

Hispanic 98 75 32 20White 88 80 50 40

Econ. Dis. 97 75 36 20

LEP 98 70 29 20

G/T 100 100 100 100



SOCIAL STUDIESSOCIAL STUDIES 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV


Afr. AmericanHispanic

White

Econ. Dis.LEP

G/TSpecial Ed

All Students

MATHEMATICSMATHEMATICS 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV


Afr. American 100 80 55 30

Hispanic 95 75 38 20

White 96 80 56 40

Econ. Dis. 95 75 38 20LEP 96 70 36 20

G/T 100 100 100 100



SCIENCESCIENCE 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV


Afr. American * 80 30

Hispanic 88 75 34 20White 100 80 75 40

Econ. Dis. 88 75 41 20

LEP 70 70 0 20

G/T 100 100 100 100

Special Ed 100 70 17 15


RESULTS - 2012PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETSSATISFACTORY ADVANCED

# of Targets Met

# of Targets Not Met

Percent at Target

good - campus improvement plan 2011-2012

Documents