blalack - campus improvement plan 2011-2012

8/3/2019 Blalack - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012

1/16

C-FBISD VISION:

All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advancedlevel and graduate college-ready and/or workforce ready without remediation.

Blalack Middle SchoolCAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN

2011-2012

Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District

Les Black, Ph.D.Principal


2/16

BOARD OF TRUSTEESNancy Cline, President

James Goode, Vice PresidentRichard Fleming, Secretary

Lynn Chaffin, Assistant SecretaryFrank Shor, Board Member

Nancy Watten, Board MemberKarin Webb, Board Member

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCHSCHOOLS

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLSCreekview

Early CollegeNewman Smith

R. L. TurnerRanchview

MIDDLE SCHOOLS

BlalackBushFieldLongPerryPolk

SUPPORTING OBJECTIVESSupporting Objective 1:

Continuously increase student achievement

Supporting Objective 2:Continuously improve the learning environment for

students and staff

Supporting Objective 3:Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Supporting Objective 4:Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and

support of our school system

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLSBlair

BlantonCarrollton

CentralCountry Place

DavisFarmers Branch

FreemanFurneaux

GoodKent

LandryLas Colinas

La VillitaMcCoy

McKamyMcLaughlinMcWhorterRainwaterRiverchaseRosemeade

Sheffield IntermediateSheffield Primary

StarkStricklandThompson

CENTERSMary Grimes Education Center

Salazar Transition SchoolKelly Pre-K Center

Huie Education CenterCLC Learning Complex

C-FBISD GOALThe Goal of the Carrollton-FarmersBranch ISD is high achievement forall students.

2


3/16

3

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVESBUSINESS/COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES

PARENT REPRESENTATIVESMelanie Meijering

ADMINISTRATORSDr. Les Black

STAFF REPRESENTATIVESBeth BennettHolly MillarCarol CrittendenClaire McLoughlinLaura GonzalezMargaret Marrs

Becky BeckAsiya RolandDennis ThorpeTony LipscombKiran Meghani

CAMPUS PLAN REVIEW :

Chair Signature Date Chair Signature Date

Chair Signature Date Chair Signature Date


4/16

4

C-FBISD VISION

All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments ofAcademic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advancedlevel and graduate college-ready and/or workforce readywithout remediation.

MISSIONTogether with families and community we commit all districtresources to guide the learning of each student to graduate as:

A responsible individual A passionate life-long learner A complex thinker An effective communicator

STATEMENT OF BELIEFSWe believe that:

The economic, political and societal success of ourcountry depends upon a quality education for all.

Diversity strengthens the community and enriches thefabric of our society.

It is the responsibility of the entire community topartner in the educational process.

Learning occurs best in a safe, orderly and nurturingenvironment.

Belonging to a family, to a school and to a communityis vital, and this sense of belonging advances learning.

People learn at different rates, have differentcapacities and that each persons educational pathdeserves to be valued equally.

Learning empowers people to reach their fullpotential: physically, mentally, socially, andemotionally

Everyone is a teacher, everyone is a learner.

GRADUATE PROFILEGraduates of the Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD are:

Responsible individuals who: Model productive citizenship Practice successful personal management Demonstrate character values and ethical behavior Appreciate the value of diversity Function effectively as team members

Competent learners who: Continually pursue and integrate knowledge Achieve academic standards Apply various forms of technology Seek educational and career options Produce quality products

Complex thinkers who: Solve problems critically Create original ideas and solutions Understand and apply systems thinking

Effective communicators who: Read with understanding Interpret information Interact through listening and speaking Write clearly


5/16

5

TARGET AREASTitle I Targeted Assisted (TA)Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program

TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standardsTA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planningTA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based researchTA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programsTA 5. Highly qualified teachersTA 6. Professional DevelopmentTA 7. Increase parental involvementTA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I School-wide Components (TS)TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessmentTS 2. School-wide reform strategiesTS 3. Highly qualified teachers

TS 4. Professional developmentTS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high-need schoolsTS 6. Parental involvementTS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programsTS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessments.TS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basisTS 10. Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services.


6/16

6

THE GOAL OF THE CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD IS HIGH ACH IEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTSSUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 1 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 2 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 3 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 4

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STUDENTACHIEVEMENTCONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THELEARNING ENVIRONMENT FORSTUDENTS AND STAFF

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASEOPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESSCONTINUOUSLY INCREASESTAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE ANDSUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM

Performance Targets:

Academic Performance Index (API)

STAAR Satisfactory STAAR Advanced Annual Drop Out Rate

Recognized/Exemplary DistinctionDesignationsAYP


Employee

Job Satisfaction Campus Environment Curriculum and Instruction

Student:

Attendance Rate Disciplinary Placements


Staff Productivity Index (SPI)


Education Productivity Index (EPI)

API SPI

Parent Satisfaction

Employee

Campus Communications

HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS


7/16

THE GOAL OF THE CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD IS HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTSSUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 1 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 2 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 3 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 4

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STUDENTACHIEVEMENT CONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THE LEARNINGENVIRONMENT FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE OPERATIONALEFFECTIVENESSCONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STAKEHOLDERCONFIDENCE AND SUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOLSYSTEM

7

Supporting Objective 1 Continuously increase student achievementPerformance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR Satisfactory; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations; AYP

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTUtilize instructional specialists and coaches toeffectively implement curriculum

Dr. Black Throughout the yearSTAARDistrict unit assessments

Title I Stafffunding, $19.925 TS 1, 2, 9

Provide acceleration for students identified as At Risk Dr. Black, Dept. Heads,Tony Lipscomb

Throughout the year STAARClassroom assessmentsGrades each 9 weeks

Comp Ed$$276,688

TS 1, 2, 9

Participate in Instructional Rounds MS NetworkDr. Black, BeckyBeck, Melanie Prine,Leadership team

OngoingSTAARSatisfactory;Recognized rating, AYPstatus

Time forparticipationandpreparation ofPoP

TS 1, 2, 4, 8, 9

School-wide training focus on WICR strategies AVID Site Team OngoingSTAARSatisfactory;Recognized rating, AYPstatus

StaffDevelopment

time in August,during staffmeetings, andearly releasedays

TS 1, 2, 4, 8, 9


8/16



8

Supporting Objective 1 Continuously increase student achievementPerformance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR - Advanced; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTCreate targeted pre-AP tutorial programs in STAAR

tested subjectsDepartment Heads October

STAAR Advancedscores, State ranking

TTeacher time,departmentheads andfacilitators

TS 1, 2, 9

Implement Instructional Improvement Process

during PD periods for all core areas All core teachers OngoingSTAARAdvanced ;Recognized rating, AYPstatus

Masterscheduling,time, Title Iplanning funds,$16.074

TS 1, 2, 4, 8, 9

Supporting Objective 1 Continuously increase student achievementPerformance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): Annual Drop Out Rate

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTImplement a process for finding and appropriately

documenting no-show students Ann Beltran

Ongoing, with progress

checks in October andNovember Dropout rate

Counselors

clerk position TTTS 1, 2, 6, 7


9/16



9

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffPerformance Target: Employee: Job Satisfaction I would recommend this campus to a friend as a good place to work.

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTImplement Sunshine Committee to respond to

staff concerns/needs appropriately Mindy Lindquist Ongoing

Employee Survey Iwould recommend this

campus to a friend as agood place to work

Teachercontributions

andparticpation

TS 5

Implement Employee Recognition ProgramPaula Arrington, LesBlack

Ongoing

Employee Survey Iwould recommend thiscampus to a friend as agood place to work

Campus budget TS5

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffPerformance Target: Employee: Campus Environment I would characterize my campus as having a positive atmosphere.

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTImplement Positive Teachers and Studentstraining module.

Sandra Coffee, BearCamp team

August

Campus survey item Iwould characterize mycampus as having apositive atmosphere."

Campusbudget, timein-service week

TS1, 2

Implement Stars of Success Student RecognitionLuke Geddie, JaneBrown, staff

Ongoing

Campus survey item Iwould characterize mycampus as having apositive atmosphere."

CampusBudget, Time

TS1, 2


10/16



10

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffPerformance Target: Employee: Curriculum and Instruction Teachers work amicably together on common problems.

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTProvide common planning time for teacherswithin departments to work on IIP, attend staff

development, and collaborate in other ways.

Dr. Black, Mary BassSpring/Summer, andthen ongoing

monitoring

Teacher SurveyMaster

scheduling

TS 1, 2, 4, 8, 9

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffPerformance Target: Student: Attendance Rate

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENT

Implement a proactive communications strategywith students and families regarding attendanceissues.

Kathy Cook Ongoing Daily Attendance Rate

Connect Ed.phoneprogram,TEAMS parentself-servealerts,attendanceclerk time

TS7

Incorporate Fitnessgram into daily PE lessons PE teachers Ongoing Daily Attendance Rate Time TS1


11/16



11

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffPerformance Target: Student: Disciplinary Placements

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTImplement Path to Success disciplinary languageand strategies

Administrators andall staff

ongoing

Numbers of in-

school/out of schoolsuspensions, AEPplacements

Time TS1, 2, 5

Implement Blalack and District Code of Conduct Administrators ongoing

Numbers of in-school/out of schoolsuspensions, AEPplacements

Time TS1,2, 5

Supporting Objective 3 Continuously increase operational effectivenessPerformance Target: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTMaintain appropriate documentation of HQ statusof teachers and paraprofessionals, ensuring thatteachers meet HQ status

Dr. Black, PersonnelDept.

OngoingNumber of HQ teachersv. non HQ teachers

Time,collaborationwith centraloffice

TS3

Examine campus staffing efficiency and makerecommendation(s) to central office

Dr. Black Jan Mar Staffing costs Time TS1,3, 10


12/16



12

Supporting Objective 4 Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemPerformance Target: Education Productivity Index (EPI); API; SPI

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTUtilize personnel effectively to support campusneeds; multiple preps, multiple duties, sharing of

personnel with other campuses.

Dr. Black Ongoing ERG-EPI dataMasterSchedule

TS 1TS 2

Conduct Title I Parent Meeting/Trainings Tony Lipscomb Twice Annually ERG-EPI dataTitle I --$562.00

TS 1TS 2

Supporting Objective 4 Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemPerformance Target: Parent Satisfaction

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTWork with PTA board to actively increase parent(and teacher) membership and in involvement

Dr. Black, Baby Railey OngoingVolunteer hours andmembership numbers,Parent Survey

Time TS7

Utilize technology to effectively communicatewith parents (Parent Connect, Benchmark email,school website and teacher pages)

Dr. Black, BeckyBeck, ShizueMoiteke, all staff

Ongoing Parent/SurveyDistrict Budgetand techresources

TS7


13/16



13

Supporting Objective 4 Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemPerformance Target: Employee: Campus Communication School has system of communication thats open, regular and honest

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTUtilize Connect Ed system to communicate

appropriate and timely information to parents,teachers and students TA1, TA 6

Dr. Black Ongoing

Community Survey:School has a system of

communication that isopen, regular andhonest.

District budget TS7

Communicate with staff via regular facultymeetings as well as through dept. leaders

Administrators,department heads

Ongoing

Community Survey:School has a system ofcommunication that isopen, regular andhonest.

District budget TS1


14/16



14

ERG Performance Index 2010 Rank 2011Target 2011 Rank 2012Target 2012 RankEducation Productivity Index(EPI)

31 20

Academic Performance Index(API)

43 15

Staff Productivity Index (SPI) 77 50

Employee Opinion Survey 2011Result 2012Target 2012ResultEmployee Job Satisfaction I wouldrecommend this campus to a friend as a

good place to work.96 98

Employee Campus Environment I wouldcharacterize my campus as having a

positive atmosphere.91 95

Employee Curriculum and Instruction

Support Teachers work amicably togetheron common problems.

94 98

Employee Campus Communication School has system of communication thats

open, regular and honest.

83 90

AEIS 2011 Result 2012Target 2012ResultCampus Rating Recognized Recognized

Student Attendance Rate 96.9 97

Students with Disciplinary Placements

600 total,(425 ISS,146 OSS,DAEP 28,JJAEP 1)

550

Achieving Quality Together (Parent Survey) 2011Result 2012Target 2012ResultVery Satisfied or Satisfied with District 79 80

RESULTS - 2012PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS# of Targets Met

# of Targets Not Met

Percent at Target


15/16



15

Supporting Objective 1 Continuously increase student achievementREADING/ELA

READING/ELA 2011 2012 2011 2012

Student Group % PASS% SATIS

% COM% ADV

Target Result Target Result

Afr. American 90 90 33 40

Hispanic 92 95 40 45

White 98 100 59 60

Econ. Dis. 93 90 37 40

LEP 76 80 8 10

G/T 98 100 90 95

Special Ed 85 88 17 20

All Students 95 95 50 55

WRITINGWRITING 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV


Afr. American 98 100 33 35Hispanic 95 96 43 45

White 97 98 73 75

Econ. Dis. 96 97 41 45

LEP 69 70 19 20

G/T 100 100 90 92

Special Ed 86 90 9. 10


SOCIAL STUDIESSOCIAL STUDIES 2011 2012 2011 2012

Student Group % PASS % SATIS % COM % ADVTarget Result Target Result



White 99 100 73 75

Econ. Dis. 93 95 41 45

LEP 77 80 14 15

G/T 98 100 66 70



MATHEMATICSMATHEMATICS 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV



Hispanic 82 85 32 35White 93 95 37 40

Econ. Dis. 85 87 25 30

LEP 68 70 10 12

G/T 97.4 100 82 85



..SCIENCE

SCIENCE 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV

Target Result Target ResultAfr. American 90 90 27 30


White 96 98 62 65

Econ. Dis. 81 85 35 40

LEP 36 40 14 15

G/T 91 95 50 55



RESULTS - 2012PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS

SATISFACTORY ADVANCED# of Targets Met


Percent at Target


16/16



16

Dropout Rate ANNUAL DROPOUT RATEGRADES 7-8C-FBISD 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

Student Group Rate Rate Target Results

Afr. American 0 0 0

Hispanic 0 0 0

White 0 0 0

Econ. Dis. 0 0 0

All Students 0 0 0

RESULTS - 2012PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETSCompletion Dropout

# of Targets Met


Percent at Target

ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP)C-FBISD Met AYP

2008 Met AYP

2009 Met AYP

2010 Met AYP

2011 Met AYP

Target 2012 Will meet AYP

Results 2012

blalack - campus improvement plan 2011-2012

Documents