2010-2011 campus improvement plan - riverchase

8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Riverchase

1/16

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

Riverchase Elementary

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN2010-2011

Rhonda Shepard, Principal

Vision Statement: Riverchase Elementary, in partnership with our families andcommunity, will develop students who meet or exceed the local and state standards

needed to successfully transition to middle school and to take advantage of the highesteducational opportunities available.

October 1, 2010


2/16

CIC MEMBERS

Name Position Years Served SignatureRhonda Shepard Principal 1

Dana Carroll Counselor 1Alison Rison LA IF 3

Kari Gould Support Center 1

Patti Bohannan Kindergarten 1

Aimet Purcell Second Grade 2

Brittany Manuel Second Grade 1

Jessica Zally Third Grade 2

Stacy Smith Fourth Grade 2

Matthew Smith Fifth Grade 1Lindsey Colwill Art Teacher 2

Sandra Lewis Parent 3


3/16

PLANNING PROCESS

Needs Assessment

The Campus Improvement Council is composed of representative professional staff, parents of students enrolled at the campus,business representatives and community members. The Campus Improvement Council establishes and reviews campus educationalplans, goals, performance objectives, and major classroom instructional programs. An annual Campus Improvement Plan guides thiswork. The Campus Improvement Plan is based on a comprehensive needs assessment which includes student achievementindicators, disaggregated by all student groups served by the campus. Additional factors such as school processes (e.g., attendance,graduation, tardies, discipline referrals, teacher absences), perception (e.g., staff, parent and community surveys), and demographics(e.g., enrollment trends, staff turnover) are to be considered.

The Campus Improvement Plan is to include (TEC Chapter 11, subchapter F, section 11.253):1. Assessment of academic achievement for each student using the student achievement indicator system.2. Set campus performance objectives based on the student achievement indicator system, including objectives for special needs

populations, including students in special education.3. Identification of how campus goals will be met for each student.4. Identification of resources needed to implement the plan.5. Identification of staff needed to implement the plan.6. Timelines for reaching goals.

7. Periodic, measureable progress toward the performance objectives.8. Goals and methods for violence prevention and intervention on campus.9. Program for encouraging parental involvement.10. Goals and objectives for a coordinated health program (elementary and middle schools) which is based on student fitness data,

student academic performance data, student attendance rates, percentage of students who are educationally disadvantaged thatensures that students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity.

Annual analysis of the plan and review of various assessment data are used to determine objectives that address campusgoals. Specific strategies and action steps are developed to address these objectives. This process ensures a commitment toexcellence and a resolve to provide the best instructional plan for every student.


4/16

Campuses receiving Title 1 funds must address Title 1 targets in campus plans and indicate where Title 1funds will be spent.

Title I --Targeted Assisted ( TA )Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program

TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standardsTA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planningTA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based researchTA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programs

TA 5. Highly qualified teachersTA 6. Professional DevelopmentTA 7. Increase Parental InvolvementTA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I -- School-wide Components (TS)TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessmentTS 2. School-wide reform strategiesTS 3. Highly qualified teachersTS 4. Professional developmentTS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high need schoolsTS 6. Parental involvement

TS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programsTS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessmentsTS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basisTS10.Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services


5/16

The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievementA. TEA Recognized/Exemplary DistrictB. Recognized/Exemplary SchoolsC. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)D. Achievement GapE. Special PopulationsF. TAKS Commended Scores (all students)G. Higher Education Readiness Component (TSI) (EXIT Scores)H. SATI. PSAT/NMSQT

J. Advanced PlacementK. Graduation Data

Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffA. Out of School SuspensionsB. DAEP PlacementsC. Attendance Rate

Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectivenessA. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST)B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instructionC. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 paymentsD. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usageE. Overtime hoursF. Highly Qualified TeachersG. Teacher Classroom Attendance RateH. All Staff Attendance Rate

I. Teacher Turnover RateJ. Availability of Critical Technology Systems

Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemA. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality TogetherB. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed)

C. Staff Survey (to be developed)


6/16

RESULTSGOAL

Should identify

what is desiredin terms of

performanceafter, or as a

result of, puttingnew processes

in place orimprovingexisting

processes.

SMARTGOAL

Goal shouldbe Strategicand specific,Measurable,Attainable,Results-

based, andTime-bound.

INDICATORStandards and

objectives (weak areasfor students)

MEASURESTools well use todetermine wherestudents are nowand whether they

are improving.

TARGETSThe attainable

performance level wewould like to see.

Remember . . . The one accomplishment that would foster longer-range actions would be agoal worthy of commitment.-Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline(1990)

At least 93% ofRiverchase

students will meetor exceed the

proficiencystandards on

TAKS in Reading.

3r

, 4t

and5

thGrade

will score93% or

better onReadingTAKS.

3rd

Grade Focus: Objective 1and 4 (3.8A and 3 RC-D)

4th

Grade Focus: Objective 1and 4 (4.11A and 4.RC-D)

5th

Grade Focus: Objective 1and 4 (TEK 5.11A and 5.RC-D)

District Assessments

QAR On-GoingImplementation

Grade Level CommonAssessments

Formative Assessments

90% of all students will meet orexceed passing standards onTAKS


7/16


Campus Goals & Objectives

RESULTSGOAL

Should identifywhat is desired

in terms ofperformanceafter, or as a



processes.

SMARTGOAL

Goal shouldbe Strategicand specific,Measurable,Attainable,Results-


INDICATORStandards and

objectives (weak areasfor students)

MEASURESTools well use todetermine wherestudents are now

and whether theyare improving.


performance level we

would like to see.

Remember . . . The one accomplishment that would foster longer-range actions would be agoal worthy of commitment.

-Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline(1990)


students will meetor exceed theproficiency

standards onTAKS in Math.

Increaseachievement

onObjectives1 and 6 forall students

on MathTAKS.

3rd

Grade Focus: Objective 1 3.1B, 3.1C, 3.2B, 3.3B, 3.4B;Objective 6 3.14A, 3.14C,3.15B, 3.16A

4th

Grade Focus: Objective 1

4.1A, 4.1B, 4.2D, 4.4D;Objective 6 4.14A,B,C,4.15B, 4.16A

5th

Grade Focus: Objectives 1and 6


District UniversalScreening

Grade Level CommonAssessments

Formative Assessments

SNAP (ProgressMonitoring)

Math TAKS

MAP Data

RtI Data

90% of all students will meetor exceed passing standardson TAKS


8/16


9/16

RESULTSGOAL

Should identify

what is desiredin terms ofperformanceafter, or as a



processes.

SMARTGOAL

Goal shouldbe Strategic

and specific,Measurable,Attainable,Results-


INDICATORStandards and objectives(weak areas for students)

MEASURESTools well use todetermine wherestudents are nowand whether they

are improving.


performance level wewould like to see.

Remember . . . The one accomplishment that would foster longer-range actions would be agoal worthy of commitment.

- Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline(1990)


students will meetor exceed the

proficiencystandards on

TAKS in Writing.

4th

Gradewill score92% or

better onWritingTAKS.

4th

Grade Focus: Objective 2(TEK 4.15C)

4th Grade Focus: Objective 4(4.20B)


Written Compositions

Common Assessments

Fountas and Pinnell OpenEnded Response

Writing Journals

90% of all students will meet orexceedpassing standards onTAKS


10/16

2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA2011 GOALS

All Students African American Hispanic White Special EdEconomicallyDisadvantaged

LEP

INDICATOR2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

Reading/English Language Arts 88 93 81 90 86 91 95 100 46 80 83 90 83 90

Mathematics 87 92 81 90 86 91 87 92 57 80 82 90 87 92

Writing 87 92 100 100 88 93 56 90 NA 80 89 94 86 91

Science 86 91 73 90 90 95 94 100 67 80 85 90 100 100

Social Studies NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

All Tests 87 92 84 90 88 93 83 90 57 80 85 90 89 94

Graduation 2009 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Graduation 2010 Goal NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Participation: Reading/Language Arts 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 97 100

Participation: Math 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 94 100

Attendance 97 98 97 98 97 98 97 98 97 98 97 98 98 99


11/16


Campus Goals

2010 Percentage of Commended Students

2011 Goals

All Students African American Hispanic White

INDICATORCam-pus

StateDiff.

from

state

2011Goal

Cam-pus

StateDiff.

from

state

2011Goal

Cam-pus

StateDiff.

from

state

2011Goal

Cam-pus

StateDiff.

from

state

2011Goal

Reading/EnglishLanguage Arts

39 35% +4 44% 34 25% +9 36% 30 28% +2 32% 47 48% -1 48%

Mathematics 31 37% -6 37% 21 23% -2 23% 23 31% -8 31% 36 47% -11 47%

Writing 30 30% 0 35% 33 21% +12 35% 25 25% 0 27% 44 38% +6 46%

Science 48 44% +4 53% 23 28% -5 38% 50 36% +14 52% 81 59% +22 83%

Social Studies NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Special Ed. Economically Disadvantaged LEP

INDICATORCam-pus

StateDiff.from

state

2011Goal

Cam-pus

StateDiff.from

state

2011Goal

Cam-pus

StateDiff.from

state

2011Goal

Reading/EnglishLanguage Arts

8 17% -9 17% 28 26% +2 30% 26 23% +3 28%

Mathematics 21 17% +4 23% 23 28% -5 28% 35 25% +10 37%

Writing NA 11% NA 11% 19 22% -3 22% 0 20% -20 20%

Science 33 24% +9 35% 25 33% -8 33% 20 20% 0 22%

Social Studies NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA


12/16


2010-11 Campus Focus

District Supporting Objective #1: Continuously increase student achievement

Campus Focus # 1 Criteria for Success Performance Measure90% of a ll sub pops will pass TAKS rea d ing and writing in 2011 D, E

90% of a ll sub pops will pass TAKS math in 2011 D, E

90% of a ll sub pops will pass TAKS sc ienc e in 2011 D, E

80% of a ll spec ial educ ation students will pass TAKS in a ll a rea s D, E5% or more increa se in c ommend ed on TAKS in a ll a rea s for 2011 F

Increase Student

Achievement

Ca mpus ra ting of Exemplary from TEA in 2011 B

Campus Foc us #2 Criteria for Suc cess Performanc e

Measure

Minimum of 60% of 3rd and 4th grad e students will be read ing ongrade leve l as me asured by Founta s and Pinne ll a t the May testing

D

Minimum of 50% of 5th grade students will me et ta rget g row th inrea d ing a s me asured by MAP by Spring 2011

D

Increase the numb er ofstudents reading on g rade

level


13/16


2010-11 Campus Focus

District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Campus Foc us # 3 Criteria for Suc cess Performanc e

Measure20% red uc tion in number of office refe rra ls A

100% of teac hers trained with R Time A, B

Improve School Clima te

District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Campus Foc us #4 Criteria for Suc cess Performanc e

Measure5% red uc tion in elec tric ity usage per mo nth D

100% of c lassroom teac hers will ha ve ESL c ertific a tion by yea r end F

Decrease Energy

Consumption

District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our schoolsystemCampus Foc us #5 Criteria for Suc cess Performanc e

MeasureInc rease parent vo lunteers by 10% A

Inc rease PTA membership by 10% B

90% favorab le parent / c om munity survey responses A

90% favorab le responses from end -of-yea r stud ent survey B, C

Increase Parent and

Comm unity Involvement

80% favorab le responses from end-of-yea r fac ulty survey B, C


14/16

Campus Focus

TitleTarg

etArea

ACTION STRATEGYFORMATIVEMEASURE

ASSESSMENTTIMELINE

RESPONSIBLEPERSON(S)

COST/RESOURCES

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

X1,2,4,9

Implem ent step s 3 5 of IIP de ep ly Cha nge in instructiona lprac tices over time

through looking at whatstude nts are a sked to do .

Sep tem be r 2010 Ma y 2011

Rhond a Shep ardDana Ca rrollAlison RisonAp ril Blac k

None

X1,2,3,9

Monitor new stud ents to Rivercha se Comm on AssessmentScores, TAKS, Unit Tests



None

X1,2,4,10

Com plete Book Studies A Frame work forUnderstanding Poverty

A Rep a ir Kit for Grad ing

Cla ssroo m Disc ussions

Ma th Talk

The Five Dysfunc tions of a

Tea m

GT Book Study

Professiona l Lea rningCom munities at Work



Shashaw n Cam pb ell

Local Funds

X1,2,4,10

Train Leadership Tea m o n Profe ssiona lLea rning Com munities

Att end PLC Sum mit; Visittwo PLC c am puses

Feb ruary 23-25;Spring 2011

Rhond a Shep ard Loc al Funds

X1,2,4,10

Train sta ff o n Professiona l Lea rningCom munities during a Summe rRetreat and faculty meetings

Sign In Sheets Ma y 2011 Aug ust2011

Rhond a Shep ard Loc al Funds

X X 1,2,4,8,9

Meet weekly with RiverchaseLea de rship Tea m about instruction

Meeting summ ary not es Sep tem be r 2010 Ma y 2011

Rhond a Shep ard None

X1,2,9,10

Trac k stude nt da ta in co re subjec ts Scho ol and individua lstudent progressmonitoring c harts


Tea chers, Ifs None

X X X

1,2,6,10

Imp leme nt Ma th and Literac y Nights Sign In Shee ts Fa ll and Spring Rhond a Shep ardDana Ca rrollAlison RisonAp ril Blac k

Loc al a nd Title Fund s$300


15/16

X X X1, 2,

6

Imp lementa tion of Nine WeeksStude nt Awa rds

Rep ort Ca rds 4 times per yea r10/11

Tea chers Loc al Fund s

X X 1, 2,9,10

Implem ent Extended Day Tuto ring TAKS Scores Weekly Tea chers, IFs,

Administration

Title and Stimulus Fund s

$15000.00

X1, 2,

4 Guided Rea ding Foc used WalkThroug hs

Tea cher Feedb ac k Forms Sep tem be r 2010 Ma y 2011

Rhond a Shep ardDana Ca rrollAlison Rison

None

X 1, 2,

4

Provide staff de velopm ent on Q AR

and Guided Read ing

Rea d ing Levels Aug ust 2010 Ma y

2011

Alison Rison None

X X 1, 2,8 ,9,10

Provid e substitutes for SNAP mee tingsfor teachers to plan interventions for

At Risk, Tier II and III stud en ts

SNAP team me etings,Fount as and Pinnell

scores, UniversalSc reenings, Co mm on

Assessments, Unit Tests,MAP data

At least 4 times ayear or as need ed

Teache rs, IFs,Administration

Title Fund s$1000.00

X 1, 2,4

Imp lement staff a ctivities to b uild andsupp ort tea ms scho ol-wide

Sta ff Respo nses Mon thly Rhond a Shep ard None

X X 1, 2,4

Continue to increa se effec tiveco mmunica tion throughout g rad e

levels

Meeting summ ary not es Weekly Rhond a Shep ardDana Ca rrollAlison RisonAp ril Blac k

None

X X 1, 2,4

Imp leme nt Trego e Dec ision-Ma kingProcess with sta ff and parents

Summ ary Notes As nee de d (August June)

Rhond a Shep ard None

X 1, 2,4

Implement R Time we ekly Lesson Plans Weekly Tea che rs Loc a l Fund s

X X 1, 2,

6, 9,10

Implem ent hom e v isits to Riverc haseCom munities to increa se p arental

involvement

Parent Survey, Agend a,Sign In Sheets

As need ed (Fall andSpring)

Rhond a Shep ardDana Ca rroll

Alison RisonAp ril Blac k

Title and Stimulus Fund s$250


16/16

X1,10

Collabo rate with Ranc hview HighScho ol to provide volunteer service

hours and supp ort to scho ol

Sign In Sheets Sep temb er 2010 June 2011

Dana Ca rroll None

1,10

Foc us on co ntinuing ed uca tion by

collaborating with Barbara BushMidd le Schoo l, Ranchview HighScho ol, and North Lake College

Volun teer Hours, Sign In

Sheets

Sep tem be r 2010

June 2011

Rhond a Shep ard

Dana Ca rrollAlison RisonAp ril Blac k

Local Funds

X 1, 2 Watt Watc hers will cond uct spo tchecks for electricity violators

Watt Watc hers Rep orts Mon thly Watt Watc hers Loc al Fund s

X1, 2,3, 5,

10

Trac k HQ issues with the HRdepartment

Certification a nd HQtrac king d ocum entation

On-Going Rhond a Shep ard None

X1, 2,3, 5,10

Participate in recruiting trips and thedistrict teacher job fair in order toattract highly qualified teachers

Rec ruiting sched ule Oc tob er 2010 June2011

Rhond a Shep ardHR Department

District Co st

X1, 2,3, 5,10

Maintain ap propriate d oc umentationof HQ sta tus of te achers an d

pa raprofessional; thereby foc using o nthe impo rtance of hiring only HQ

teachers and teacher assistants whoare HQ

Numbe r of HQ tea ch ersand HQ teacher assistants

hired

On-Going Rhond a Shep ard None

10 Home room te ac hers will inco rporateportions of the fitnessgram in da ily

CATCH

Tea cher Lesson Plans andCATCH Docum enta tion

On-Go ing Phyllis Jac kson CATCH Ac tivity Boxes

10 All PE Cla sses will incorp ora tefitnessgram into wa rm up ac tivities

Tea cher Lesson Plans On-Go ing Phyllis Jac kson Fitnessgra m Guide lines

2010-2011 campus improvement plan - riverchase

Documents