davis - campus improvement plan 2011-2012

8/3/2019 Davis - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012

1/13

C-FBISD VISION:

All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advancedlevel and graduate college-ready and/or workforce ready without remediation.

Davis ElementaryCAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN

2011-2012

Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District

Lisa Williams


2/13

BOARD OF TRUSTEESNancy Cline, President

James Goode, Vice PresidentRichard Fleming, Secretary

Lynn Chaffin, Assistant SecretaryFrank Shor, Board Member

Nancy Watten, Board MemberKarin Webb, Board Member

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCHSCHOOLS

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLSCreekview

Early CollegeNewman Smith

R. L. TurnerRanchview

MIDDLE SCHOOLSBlalackBush

FieldLongPerryPolk

SUPPORTING OBJECTIVESSupporting Objective 1:

Continuously increase student achievement

Supporting Objective 2:Continuously improve the learning environment for

students and staff

Supporting Objective 3:Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Supporting Objective 4:Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and

support of our school system

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLSBlair

BlantonCarrollton

CentralCountry Place

DavisFarmers Branch

FreemanFurneaux

GoodKent

LandryLas Colinas

La VillitaMcCoy

McKamyMcLaughlinMcWhorterRainwaterRiverchaseRosemeade

Sheffield IntermediateSheffield Primary

StarkStricklandThompson

CENTERSMary Grimes Education Center

Salazar Transition SchoolKelly Pre-K Center

Huie Education CenterCLC Learning Complex

C-FBISD GOALThe Goal of the Carrollton-FarmersBranch ISD is high achievement forall students.

2


3/13

3

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVESBUSINESS/COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES

PARENT REPRESENTATIVES

Tony Salyer

ADMINISTRATORS

Lisa Williams, PrincipalMaxine Reed, Asst. Principal

STAFF REPRESENTATIVESRaelynn TiceCarolyn MoormanDianne MartinKaren Ambrose

CAMPUS PLAN REVIEW :

Chair Signature Date Chair Signature Date

Chair Signature Date Chair Signature Date


4/13

4

C-FBISD VISIONAll students will meet the State of Texas Assessments ofAcademic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advancedlevel and graduate college-ready and/or workforce readywithout remediation.

MISSIONTogether with families and community we commit all districtresources to guide the learning of each student to graduate as:

A responsible individual A passionate life-long learner A complex thinker An effective communicator

STATEMENT OF BELIEFSWe believe that:

The economic, political and societal success of ourcountry depends upon a quality education for all.

Diversity strengthens the community and enriches thefabric of our society.

It is the responsibility of the entire community topartner in the educational process.

Learning occurs best in a safe, orderly and nurturingenvironment.

Belonging to a family, to a school and to a communityis vital, and this sense of belonging advances learning.

People learn at different rates, have differentcapacities and that each persons educational pathdeserves to be valued equally.

Learning empowers people to reach their fullpotential: physically, mentally, socially, andemotionally

Everyone is a teacher, everyone is a learner.

GRADUATE PROFILEGraduates of the Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD are:

Responsible individuals who: Model productive citizenship Practice successful personal management Demonstrate character values and ethical behavior Appreciate the value of diversity Function effectively as team members

Competent learners who: Continually pursue and integrate knowledge Achieve academic standards Apply various forms of technology Seek educational and career options Produce quality products

Complex thinkers who: Solve problems critically Create original ideas and solutions Understand and apply systems thinking

Effective communicators who: Read with understanding Interpret information Interact through listening and speaking Write clearly


5/13

5

TARGET AREASTitle I Targeted Assisted (TA)Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program

TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standardsTA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planningTA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based researchTA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programsTA 5. Highly qualified teachersTA 6. Professional DevelopmentTA 7. Increase parental involvementTA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I School-wide Components (TS)TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessmentTS 2. School-wide reform strategiesTS 3. Highly qualified teachers

TS 4. Professional developmentTS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high-need schoolsTS 6. Parental involvementTS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programsTS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessments.TS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basisTS 10. Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services.


6/13

6

THE GOAL OF THE CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD IS HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTSSUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 1 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 2 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 3 SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 4

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STUDENTACHIEVEMENTCONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THELEARNING ENVIRONMENT FORSTUDENTS AND STAFF

CONTINUOUSLY INCREASEOPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESSCONTINUOUSLY INCREASESTAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE ANDSUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM

Performance Targets:

Academic Performance Index (API)

STAAR Satisfactory STAAR Advanced

Recognized/Exemplary DistinctionDesignationsAYP


Employee

Job Satisfaction Campus Environment Curriculum and Instruction

Student:

Attendance Rate Disciplinary Placements


Staff Productivity Index (SPI)


Education Productivity Index (EPI)

API SPI

Parent Satisfaction

Employee

Campus Communications

HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS


7/13


CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STUDENTACHIEVEMENT CONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THE LEARNINGENVIRONMENT FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE OPERATIONALEFFECTIVENESSCONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STAKEHOLDERCONFIDENCE AND SUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOLSYSTEM

7

Supporting Objective 1 Continuously increase student achievementPerformance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR Satisfactory; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations; AYP

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTProvide focused safety nets for all sts including GT, LEP,At Risk, Sp. Ed.

Lisa Williams August 2011-May 2012STAAR; MAP; benchmarkexams

$34,000 Title I fortutoring andprofessionaldevelopment,materials, books,

1, 2, 8, 9, 10

Improve Readers Writers Workshop and MathInvestigations program

Lisa Williams August 2011 May 2012

MAP; Fountas and Pinnell;writing samplesSTAAR; benchmarkassessments

$ 20,000Title I -substitutesfor PD; teacherand studentmaterials,professionaldevelopmentCompensatoryEd. Funds

$55,317.41 forDistrict supportpersonnel

1, 2, 4, 5, 8

Implement Student Fitness improvement camp with agoal to reduce the BMI 2%

Lisa WilliamsKevin Sullivan, PETeacherDebbie Wise, nurse

September 2011-May2012

Fitnessgram Results Local 1, 2, 6

Pilot updated grading procedures Lisa Williams August 2011-May 2012 STAAR; MAP, Survey Staff time 2, 8

Develop teacher leadership capacity Lisa Williams August 2011-May 2012Instructional Rounds-internal

Title I$2000

4

Focus on Expectations for Instruction Lisa Williams August 2011-May 2012 Principal observation Title I$1000

4

Imbed technology into teacher professionaldevelopment and classroom instruction whereappropriate for teachers and students

Lisa Williams August 2011-May 2012Teacher Feedback;Principal observations

Title I$5000

2, 4


8/13



8

Supporting Objective 1 Continuously increase student achievementPerformance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR - Advanced; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTBuild leadership capacity within a PLC framework tostudy IIP and create a plan to achieve high pressclassrooms with level 2 discourse

Lisa Williams August 2011-June 2011STAAR; MAP; InstructionalRounds-internal andexternal

$$$TTit$$Ttle 4, 844445www

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffPerformance Target: Employee: Job Satisfaction I would recommend this campus to a friend as a good place to work.

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTProvide professional development to maintain ahighly qualified, highly productive, and effectiveteaching staff

Lisa Williams August 2011-June 2012 STAAR; MAP; BenchmarkexamsEmployee Survey

LocalTitle I $4,000

3, 4

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffPerformance Target: Employee: Campus Environment I would characterize my campus as having a positive attitude.

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTBuild a culture of collegial support throughrecording instructional segments on iPads andusing those recordings to improve theenvironment for students and instruction,particularly around discourse. Videos will beshown to students and teachers with the intent ofimproving facilitation of academic discourse

Lisa Williams August 2011-June 2012 Employee Survey Local 5


9/13



9

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffPerformance Target: Employee: Curriculum and Instruction Teachers work amicably together on common problems.

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTImplememt teacher led Professional Learning

Communities that focus on improving instructionand implementing the curriculum Lisa Williams August 2011-June 2012

STAAR; MAP; Benchmark

data Local 2, 4, 5, 8

Schedule monthly vertical team meetings in coresubjects to align instruction, discussimplemention of the curriculum, and progressmonitor achievement

Lisa Williams August 2011-June 2012STAAR; MAP; Benchmarkdata

Local 4, 5, 8

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffPerformance Target: Student: Attendance Rate

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTImplement attendance recognition program tomaintain 97+%

Lisa Williams MaxineReed

August 2011-May 2012 AEIS report Local 1, 6

Supporting Objective 2 Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffPerformance Target: Student: Disciplinary Placements

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTReduce ISSs by 20% using other tactics fordiscipline listed in the Student Code of Conduct

Lisa WilliamsMaxine Reed

August 2011-May 2012 TEAMS discipline rpt Local 10

Implement R time school wide Lisa Williams August 2011-May 2012Lesson plans andbehavior observations byteachers and students

Local 10


10/13



10

Supporting Objective 3 Continuously increase operational effectivenessPerformance Target: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTMaintain 100% Highly qualified staff withattendance rate exceeding 97% by encouragingdistrict provided vaccines and posting attendance

rates monthly. Only 2 teachers are permitted totake personal days at one time in order to reducethe negative impact on instruction. E-mails will besent daily with substitute teachers names and forwhom they are subbing.

Lisa Williams August 2011-June 2012 Staffing and Attendancereport

Local 3

Supporting Objective 4 Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemPerformance Target: Education Productivity Index (EPI); API; SPI

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTMaintain low index in the ERG Lisa Williams August 2011-June 2012 ERG Analytics Local 2, 4, 5


11/13



11

Supporting Objective 4 Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemPerformance Target: Parent Satisfaction

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTProvide parent education opportunities forcurriculum, issues facing students, and student

achievement

Lisa Williams August 2011-June 2012 Parent SurveyLocal

Title I $2162.84

6, 7

Utilize district communication system to keepparent apprised of school activities, parenttrainings, and other events.

Lisa Willams August 2011-June 2012 Parent Survey Local 6

Supporting Objective 4 Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemPerformance Target: Employee: Campus Communication School has system of communication thats open, regular and honest

ACTION STRATEGY PERSONRESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/MEASURE RESOURCES TITLE ICOMPONENTProvide effective vehicles for opencommunication among teams and administration

Lisa WilliamsTeam Leaders August 2011-June 2011

Employee SatisfactionSurvey

Local 6


12/13



12

ERG Performance Index 2010 Rank 2011Target 2011 Rank 2012Target 2012 RankEducation Productivity Index(EPI)

5 4

Academic Performance Index(API)

3 2

Staff Productivity Index (SPI) 24 24

Employee Opinion Survey 2011Result 2012Target 2012ResultEmployee Job Satisfaction I wouldrecommend this campus to a friend as a

good place to work.91% 92%

Employee Campus Environment I wouldcharacterize my campus as having a

positive atmosphere.94% 95%

Employee Curriculum and Instruction

Support Teachers work amicably togetheron common problems.

99% 100%

Employee Campus Communication School has system of communication thats

open, regular and honest.

87% 90%

AEIS 2011Result 2012Target 2012ResultCampus Rating Exemplary Advanced

Student Attendance Rate 97% 97%Students with Disciplinary Placements

Achieving Quality Together (Parent Survey) 2011Result 2012Target 2012ResultVery Satisfied or Satisfied with District 95% 96%

RESULTS - 2012PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS# of Targets Met

# of Targets Not Met

Percent at Target

ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP)C-FBISD Met AYP2008 Met

2009 Met

2010 Met

2011 Met

Target 2012 Meet

Results 2012


13/13



13

Supporting Objective 1 Continuously increase student achievementREADING/ELA

READING/ELA 2011 2012 2011 2012

Student Group % PASS% SATIS

% COM% ADV

Target Result Target Result

Afr. American 91 91 31 33

Hispanic 92 92 51 52

White 100 100 57 57

Econ. Dis. 92 92 45 45LEP 88 90 48 48

G/T 100 100 100 100

Special Ed 88 90 22 23

All Students 93 93 50 52

WRITINGWRITING 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV


Afr. American 100 100 56

Hispanic 100 100 63White 90 92 40Econ. Dis. 98 98 60

LEP 100 100 67

G/T 100 100 100Special Ed 100 100 29

All Students 99 99 62

SOCIAL STUDIESSOCIAL STUDIES 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV


Afr. AmericanHispanic

White

Econ. Dis.LEP

G/TSpecial Ed

All Students

MATHEMATICS

MATHEMATICS 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV




White 97 97 68 68

Econ. Dis. 96 97 45 47

LEP 97 97 43 43G/T 100 100 100 100



SCIENCESCIENCE 2011 2012 2011 2012


% COM% ADV




White 100 100 94 94Econ. Dis. 98 98 60 60

LEP 89 89 44 45

G/T 100 100 100 100



RESULTS - 2012PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETSSATISFACTORY ADVANCED

# of Targets Met

# of Targets Not Met

Percent at Target

davis - campus improvement plan 2011-2012

Documents