q3 & q4 evaluation of ogip, aiesec czech republic

23
GIP

Upload: mihai-zamfir

Post on 18-Dec-2014

954 views

Category:

Business


2 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

GIP

Page 2: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

GIP –

RA MA RE PL RE % PL RE % PL RE %

Brno 0 10 0 3 6 8 133% CZU Praha 2 8 400% 3 1 33% 5 2 40% Hradec 1 0 0% 4 0 0% 5 1 20% Karvina 0 1 0 1 0 1 Olomouc 3 4 133% 2 2 100% 2 1 50% Ostrava 3 1 33% 5 1 20% 4 1 25% Plzen 0 1 0 1 1 2 200% Praha 25 16 64% 19 9 47% 24 16 67% České budějovice 0 0

4 4 100% 2 1 50%

Zlin 0 4 5 2 40% 6 3 50% MC 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 34 45 132% 42 24 57% 55 37 67%

Page 3: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

Q3 - RA

Grow: MA

Grow: RE

Grow: 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013

Brno 1 10 900% 1 3 200% 7 8 14%

CZU 1 8 700% 3 1 -67% 4 2 -50%

Hradec 0 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 1

Karviná 2 1 -50% 2 1 -50% 0 1

Olomouc 2 4 100% 2 2 0% 3 1 -67%

Ostrava 1 1 0% 2 1 -50% 2 1 -50%

Plzeň 0 1 1 1 0% 3 2 -33%

Praha 12 16 33% 11 10 -9% 13 16 23%

ČB 0 0 0% 0 3 0 1

Zlin 3 4 33% 1 2 100% 0 3

Total 23 45 96% 24 24 0% 35 37 6%

Page 4: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

Q4 RA MA RE

PL RE % PL RE % PL RE % Brno 10 8 80% 9 6 67% 2 3 150% CZU Praha 3 3 100% 5 1 20% 1 0 0% Hradec 12 4 33% 2 0 0% 2 0 0% Karvina 3 1 33% 1 1 100% 0 0 Olomouc 2 0 0% 4 1 25% 3 2 67% Ostrava 14 3 21% 8 1 13% 9 1 11% Plzen 19 2 11% 0 0 - 0 0 - Praha 47 12 26% 20 12 60% 13 7 54%

České budějovice 5 3 60% 2 0 0% 3 3 100% Zlin 2 2 100% 4 4 100% 4 1 25% Total 117 39 33% 55 27 49% 40 18 45%

GIP –

Page 5: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

RA Grow:

MA Grow:

RE Grow:

2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 Brno 4 8 100% 4 6 50% 2 3 50% CZU 3 3 0% 1 1 0% 1 0 -100%

Hradec 5 4 -20% 0 0 0% 0 0 0% Karviná 3 1 -67% 0 1 1 0 -100%

Olomouc 1 0 -100% 2 1 -50% 2 2 0% Ostrava 4 3 -25% 1 1 0% 2 1 -50%

Plzeň 6 2 -67% 1 0 -100% 0 0 0% Praha 19 12 -37% 11 12 9% 9 7 -22%

ČB - 3 - 0 0 0% - 3 - Zlin 3 2 -33% 3 4 33% 3 1 -66%

Total 48 39 -21% 22 27 23% 20 18 -10%

Q4 -

Page 6: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

Q3 + Q4

Page 7: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

Q3 + Q4

RA MA RE

PL RE % PL RE % PL RE % Brno 10 18 180% 9 9 100% 8 11 138% CZU Praha 5 11 220% 8 2 25% 6 2 33% Hradec 13 4 31% 6 0 0% 7 1 14% Karvina 3 2 67% 1 2 200% 0 1 - Olomouc 5 4 80% 6 3 50% 5 3 60% Ostrava 17 4 24% 13 2 15% 13 2 15% Plzen 19 3 16% 0 1 - 1 2 200% Praha 72 28 39% 39 21 54% 37 23 62%

České budějovice 5 3 60% 6 4 67% 5 4 80% Zlin 2 6 300% 9 6 67% 10 4 40% Total 151 82 55% 97 51 52% 92 55 60%

GIP –

Page 8: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

RA Grow:

MA Grow:

RE Grow:

2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 Brno 5 18 260% 5 9 80% 9 11 22% CZU 4 11 175% 4 2 -50% 5 2 -60%

Hradec 5 4 -20% 0 0 0% 0 1 - Karviná 5 2 -60% 2 2 0% 1 1 0%

Olomouc 3 4 33% 4 3 -25% 5 3 -40% Ostrava 5 4 -20% 3 2 -33% 4 2 -50%

Plzeň 6 3 -50% 2 1 -50% 3 2 -33% Praha 31 28 -10% 22 22 0% 22 23 5%

ČB 0 3 - 0 3 - 0 4 - Zlin 6 6 0% 4 6 50% 3 4 33%

Total 70 83 19% 46 50 9% 55 55 0%

Q3 + Q4 -

Page 9: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic
Page 10: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

Q3 + Q4

RA MA RE

PL RE % PL RE % PL RE % Brno 35 18 51% 26 9 35% 20 11 55% CZU Praha 23 11 48% 16 2 13% 15 2 13% Hradec 24 4 17% 20 0 0% 16 1 6% Karvina 11 2 18% 6 2 33% 5 1 20% Olomouc 20 4 20% 18 3 17% 14 3 21% Ostrava 36 4 11% 31 2 6% 18 2 11% Plzen 34 3 9% 26 1 4% 19 2 11% Praha 160 28 18% 100 21 21% 90 23 26%

České budějovice 17 3 18% 13 4 31% 10 4 40% Zlin 22 6 27% 13 6 46% 10 4 40% Total 382 83 22% 269 50 19% 220 55 25%

GIP –

Page 11: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

RA MA RE Brno 14 14 8 CZU Praha 12 14 13 Hradec 20 19 15 Karvina 9 4 4 Olomouc 16 15 10 Ostrava 30 27 16 Plzen 30 25 17 Praha 132 78 66 České budějovice 14 8 5 Zlin 15 7 4 TOTAL 292 211 158

Page 12: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic
Page 13: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

GIP - Matched ppl / Raised ppl

LC Ra Ma % 2012

RN 50 20 40% 65%

CZU 18 5 28% 46%

KV 4 2 50% 25%

OL 17 9 53% 90%

OVA 14 5 37% 53%

PL + HK 18 5 28% 40%

PA 98 40 41% 57%

ZL 14 8 57% 63%

Total 234 97 41,5% 56%

Page 14: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

GIP - Matched ppl / Raised ppl

LC RA RE % 2012

RN 50 15 28% 61%

CZU 18 4 22% 46%

KV 4 1 25% 25%

OL 17 9 53% 90%

OVA 14 5 37% 53%

PL+HK 18 4 22% 40%

PA+CB 98 33 34% 57%

ZL 14 6 43% 63%

Total 236 79 34% 56%

Right now we have 15 MA that are waiting for being RE

Page 15: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic
Page 16: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

NPS Score: 18

RR: 58% (84 out of 146)

Promoter: 39

Detractors: 40

Passives: 21

Page 17: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic
Page 18: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

19

35

15

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Matched Realized Completed

Page 19: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

LC NPS Score

# Resp # Promo

# Pass # Detr % Promo

Resp. Rate

Brno 10 16 5 7 4 31% 52%

CZU 75 4 3 1 0 75% 43%

Karvina 50 2 1 1 0 50% 33%

Olomouc 38 8 3 5 0 38% 43%

Ostrava -33 3 1 0 2 33% 33%

Plzen + HK

100 3 3 0 0 100% 50%

Praha + CB

11 55 20 21 14 36% 70%

Zlin 13 8 2 5 1 25% 57%

Page 20: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

Cross Cultural understanding &

awareness (16%)

Integration by the hosting entity

(13%)

Logistical support (10%)

Page 21: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

Job Description Clarity & alignment (17%)

Communication effectivity during acceptance procedure (13%)

Matching support(13%)

Logistical support (13%)

Visa documents and information (11%)

Page 22: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

The selection process (29%)

AIESEC’s support during the

experience(18%)

Matching support(14%)

Visa documents and

information (11%)

Page 23: Q3 & Q4 Evaluation of oGIP, AIESEC Czech Republic

Bad recruitment planning in Q4 (not a national

wave, wrong target group)

Low conversion rates up until Ra (between

Application and people coming to interview,

between people passing the interview and people that are signing contract)

Partner countries opportunities starting to produce

more results in matching

Jobs.cz great opportunity, but not fully taken

advantaged and optimized for conversion