fermilab cryomodule qa/qc model jamie blowers lcls-ii edm/plm applications 31-mar-2014
TRANSCRIPT
Fermilab Cryomodule QA/QC Model
Jamie Blowers
LCLS-II EDM/PLM Applications
31-Mar-2014
Outline
• QA/QC “first principles”• Fermilab QA, Procurement, and Engineering framework• QA/QC staff and function infrastructure• Process control software infrastructure, Vector• Our approach to-date regarding cryomodule assembly• Challenges• First order QA/QC scenario for LCLS-II• Second order scenarios• Discussion
31-Mar-2014J. Blowers | FNAL QA/QC2
3
QA/QC “First Principles”
• Apply our limited resources in the most effective way possible to minimize risk and assure that all requirements are met
• Ensure that requirements/expectations, both in-house and external, are as clear as concise as possible
• Culture counts; leverage its strengths, account for its weaknesses
• As much as possible leverage proven and effective processes/tools
31-Mar-2014J. Blowers | FNAL QA/QC
4
Fermilab QA and Engineering Framework
31-Mar-2014J. Blowers | FNAL QA/QC
5
Staff/function Infrastructure
31-Mar-2014J. Blowers | FNAL QA/QC
Hiring Hiring
6
Process Control System: Vector
• All travelers are fully electronic; http://vector.fnal.gov/• System is currently read-only to the world, so easy data
sharing is in place• Current cavity travelers:
31-Mar-2014J. Blowers | FNAL QA/QC
7
Vector (con’t)
• As much as we could, we replicated the functionality and flexibility of a paper traveler:
31-Mar-2014J. Blowers | FNAL QA/QC
8
Vector (con’t)
• Reporting: choose any or all fields of any traveler, and the report is generated and can be saved to Excel:
31-Mar-2014J. Blowers | FNAL QA/QC
9
Vector (con’t)
• CERN 11T magnet folks set up an instance of Vector at CERN, and they made a very detailed presentation of the system:
http://tdserver1.fnal.gov/blowers/Projects/Vector/vector.pptx
31-Mar-2014J. Blowers | FNAL QA/QC
10
Cryomodule Fabrication Model
• Purchase major components from industry, using detailed specifications and/or drawings
• Everything is inspected prior to being released to production– Inspection records are maintained for all inspections,
including non-conformances– Serialized parts are inspected using a traveler (Vector)
• Every processing/testing/fabrication process is done according to a traveler, which outlines the steps to follow, the necessary data to record, and sign-offs.
• All discrepancies are recorded and tracked to closure.
This is all “motherhood and apple pie”
31-Mar-2014J. Blowers | FNAL QA/QC
11
Challenges
• Fermilab does not have a robust, user-friendly "cavity database".– For ILC-related work, our cavity performance data were being
entered into the DESY cavity database.• During our cavity R&D efforts (last many years), we have not been
very successful in maintaining full traceability from cavity half-cells to the Nb material.– We plan to have this fixed for the LCLS-II cavity procurement.– Example for “CM2”: https://vector-offsite.fnal.gov/VectorHardCopy/13335.asp
• Culture change:– Shifting from an R&D mode into a production mode is not trivial.– The needed infrastructure is there, but the mental shift to doing
some things in a more structured manner will take time and effort.
31-Mar-2014J. Blowers | FNAL QA/QC
12
First Order Scenario
• Like JLab, to first order, our present systems and processes have proven to be effective for cryomodule procurement and fabrication.
• The path of least resistance would be to leverage the systems/processes in place at each Lab.
• For Fermilab:– Procurement: provide sufficient oversight, tuned to the experience of each
supplier, to ensure that we receive what we require, when we need it. Regular monitoring of progress. Most data received unstructured (e.g. PDF), with small subset structured (e.g. spreadsheet template)
– Inspect what we receive– When it comes to SRF, cleanliness is next to godliness– Use Vector for all travelers– Deliver hardware and associated records/data to SLAC
• Some small subset of data would be delivered structured, in the same format for both JLab and Fermilab
• Work very closely with JLab to implement a consistent QA/QC cryomodule fabrication framework
31-Mar-2014J. Blowers | FNAL QA/QC
13
Second Order Scenarios
• I’m looking forward to learning from the DESY/XFEL experience, and applying what they’ve learned to LCLS-II– Minimum: applying what they’ve learned to our processes– More aggressive: stand up the XFEL system, or use DESY’s
installation
• Vector can be modified (security model) to have suppliers enter data directly
• I am open to the possibility of standardizing on a single traveler system (and we’ve set aside Wednesday to discuss that between the JLab and Fermilab folks)
• Based on the known challenges, I believe some of our limited resources might be best applied to the issue of not having a robust cavity performance database, and creating one to be used by both Fermilab and JLab.
31-Mar-2014J. Blowers | FNAL QA/QC
14
Closing
• Discussion
For further information:
Jamie Blowers
o1: 630-840-4784
o2: 630-840-2800
c: 630-277-6520
31-Mar-2014J. Blowers | FNAL QA/QC