defendant charlene e. honeywell

8/9/2019 Defendant Charlene E. Honeywell

1/23

74

292. Defendant Martin extorted and concealed, and conspired to extort and conceal, that he

procedure on execution did not accord with the procedure of the State of Florida. See

Fed.R.Civ.P. 69. Defendant knew that Florida procedure required a recorded and certified

judgment, which here had neverexisted. The Court never had any authority to award

$5,048.60, and the judgment issued as mandate on 06/11/2009 in the amount of$24.30 had

been paid. The prima facie fraudulent affidavit by Defendant Racketeer JACK N.

PETERSON fraudulently pretended a 07/29/2009 judgment, Doc. # 432-2, Case No.

2:2007-cv-00228, which all Defendants knew, concealed, and conspired to conceal had

neverexisted. See also Ch. 55, 56, Florida Statutes.

DEFENDANT CHARLENE E. HONEYWELL

RECORD LACK OFIMMUNITY- PERPETRATION OF UNLAWFUL ACTS

293. The Plaintiff public corruption victims are suing Defendant corrupt U.S. District Judge

Charlene Edwards Honeywell (Honeywell), a female Afro-American Judge, in herprivate

individual capacity and official capacity. Defendant Honeywells unlawful and criminal acts

on record were outside any immunity and officialcapacity.

FELONIES OUTSIDE ANY official CAPACITY

294. Defendant Corrupt Honeywell had knowledge of the actual commission offelonies and

concealed them. Here even though Def. Honeywell had knowledge of, e.g., judicial Co-

Defendant Chappells, Steeles, Pizzos, and Lazzaras obstruction of justice and

fraudulent concealment of facially forged land parcels, a falsified writ of execution,

falsified $5,048.60 judgment, Corrupt Honeywell did not make the same known to some

judge or person in authority, but covered up for said Offenders in exchange forbribes, 18

U.S.C. 3, 4.


2/23

75

ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT

295. Defendant Crook Honeywell knew that Defendant principal Offenders Steele, Chappell,

Pizzo, and Lazzara had committed record offenses and assisted said Offenders, 18 U.S.C.

3, 4. See, e.g., Case No. 2:2010-cv-00089, Doc. # 50, assistance with facially fraudulent

writ of execution; see Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791, Doc. ## 213, 236, assistance with record

forgeries.

DELIBERATE DEPRIVATIONS UNDER COLOR OF FAKE writ AND resolution

296. Defendant Government Whore deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs, e.g., under color of a

fake writ of execution and resolution 569/875, 18 U.S.C. 241, 242.

RECORD RETALIATION UNDER COLOR OF WRIT OF EXECUTION&SANCTIONS

297. With the intent to retaliate, Corrupt Honeywell knowingly took actions harmful to the

Plaintiff public corruption victims, which included interference with Plaintiffs livelihood

and record land ownership, because the Plaintiff landowners had provided truthful

information relating to the commission of Federal offenses to law enforcement, 18 U.S.C.

1513.

298. Knowingly, Honeywell extorted Plaintiffs property and/or threatened to do so, with

corrupt intent to retaliate against the Plaintiffs because the Plaintiffs had blown the whistle

on public corruption; in particular, because the Plaintiffs had produced records and testimony

conclusively evidencing Government corruption and fraud, and information about the

commission of Federal offenses by Government Officials. Here, Plaintiff Government crime

and corruption victims had the right to be reasonably protected from the Government

Offenders and Judges of record, 18 U.S.C. 3771.


3/23

76

RECORD POLICY, CUSTOM, AND CULTURE OF CORRUPTION

299. Customarily, and over and over again, Honeywell coerced the Plaintiffs to refrain from

prosecuting and producing crime evidence. Idiotic lies and threats of sanctions have played

a central role in Honeywells record crimes and concealment. Just like Jews and

Government opponents in Nazi Germany, the Plaintiff Government crime victims are

running from the anarchy, extortion, and coercion in Honeywells court of perversions

where un-recorded and non-existentjudgments can be perverted into a lien on property.

BLACKMAIL, EXTORTION, UNLAWFUL COMMUNICATIONS & THREATS

300. In retaliation and exchange for bribes, Defendant Crooked Judge Honeywell made

threatening demands without any justification under color of law, authority, and falsified

official records. In particular, Defendant Corrupt Judge threatened, e.g., monetary

sanctions, civil contempt, and/or arrest, merely because the Plaintiff public corruption

victims had exposed and blown the whistle on, e.g., Honeywells crimes, extortion,

coercion, and fraud on the Court.

EXACTION OF MONEY BY THREAT OF, E.G., ARREST AND CIVIL CONTEMPT

301. Honeywell exacted, threatened to exact, and/or conspired with other Officials and

Defendants to exact money from Plaintiffs by threat of monetary sanctions, civil

contempt, and/or arrest under color of, e.g., office and falsified official records. In

particular, Def. Honeywell conspired to extort $5,048.60 in the absence of any recorded

authentic judgment and justification. Honeywell caused other Government Officials to

falsify, alter, and destroy official records forcriminal and illegal purposes ofconcealing

Honeywells extortion, coercion, obstruction of justice and other crimes of record.


4/23

77

Honeywell made unlawful communications and threatened Plaintiff public corruption

whistleblowers. See, e.g., Case No. 2:2010-cv-00089, Doc. # 50, p. 3:

Shortly thereafter, the writwas issued(2:07-CV-228, Dkt. 425).

Defendant Government Whore Honeywell knew and fraudulentlyconcealed that no writ

had ever been issued and/or could have possibly been issued, because, e.g., no recorded

$5,048.60 judgment had everexisted. For criminal & illegal purposes of, e.g., extorting

and obstructing justice, said Defendant falsely and idiotically pretended lack of

authority over record extortion under color of a falsified official record by U.S.

Defendants, Case No. 2:2010-00089, Doc. # 50, 07/14/10, p. 3:

Because Case No. 2:07-CV-228 was assigned to Judge John Steele, this Court doesnothave the authority togrant relief from the writ of execution.

302. Just like a bunglingGovernment idiot, Def. Honeywell contradicted herself in the next

paragraph, in which she cited Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), Doc. # 50, pp. 3-4:

A party may move forrelieffrom afinal judgmentororder. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b).

As such, the matter is closed, except for the issue ofsanctions.

Plaintiffs have given the Court more than enough grounds to impose sanctions for

theirmisconduct.

MISCONDUCT AND EXTENSION OF RECORD CRIMES AND FALSIFIED writ

303. Def. Honeywell recklessly extended the record Government crimes and falsified writ,

Doc. # 425:

To the extent that Plaintiffs request injunctive relief, the Motions will be denied.

See Doc. # 50, p. 4.

304. Defendant Honeywell fraudulently concealed that sanctions were not any issue but

Honeywells recordcrimes and unlawfulacts such as, e.g., extortion, concealment, and


5/23

78

fraud were. In said organized cover-up, Defendant Honeywell concealed that there had

never been any $5,048.60 judgment of record and that no judgment of record had ever

even referenced any frivolous appeal.

305. Honeywell promoted the record culture and policy of corruption, anarchy,

lawlessness and perversion of law and facts. With corrupt intent to obtain illegal benefits,

Honeywell incomprehensibly and disjointedly copied and pasted together illegal

orders and judicial trash without ever addressing the complained about legal issues and

claims for relief.

RECKLESS DEPRIVATIONS AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE & COURT ACCESS

306. For criminal and illegal purposes of obstructing justice, extorting, coercing, and

concealing, Defendant Criminal Honeywell obstructed, and caused other Officials and

Defendants to obstruct, the filing of, e.g., Plaintiffs Notice of Appeal from order, Doc. #

213, Notice of Appeal from order, Doc. # 236, Case No. 2-2009-cv-00791:

The Clerk is directed to terminate these motions.3. The Clerk is further directed to no longer accept ANY filings from Plaintiffs

in this case because a judgment has been entered and Plaintiffs have filed a

notice of appeal as to the Courts Order (Dkt. 213), and this case is CLOSED.4. Finally, the Clerk is also directed to strike Published Public Notices from therecord (Dkt. 220, 221, 223, 225, 226, 229, 230, 232, 233, 234, 235).

ILLEGAL DESTRUCTION AND MUTILATION OF OFFICIAL RECORDS

307. With corrupt intent to extort, blackmail, coerce, defraud, deprive, and obtain illegal

benefits, Defendant Corrupt Honeywell destroyed, mutilated, caused others to destroy and

mutilate, and conspired with, e.g., other Officials to destroy and mutilate official records,

Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791, Doc. # 236, 07/02/2010, p. 3:

Plaintiffs have also filed several documents entitled Published Public Notice (Dkt.220, 221, 223, 225, 226, 229, 230, 232, 233, 234, and 235). These documents do notrelate to any pending motion. Further, they are not motions which request affirmativerelief by the Court. They are immaterial to this case, which has been dismissed.


6/23

79

Moreover, some of the documents contain scandalous materials. These noticesshould, therefore, be stricken. See Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791, Doc. # 236, pp. 2-3.

MISUSE OF PUBLIC OFFICE, CONCEALMENT, AND COVER UP

308. In exchange forbribes, Defendant Government Whore Honeywell obstructed, delayed,

and prevented the communication of judicial and Government corruption information

relating to the commission offelonies by, e.g., U.S. Agents J. E. Steele, S. Polster Chappell,

M. A. Pizzo, R. A. Lazzara, and Def. record Forger of land parcels K. M. Wilkinson, and

Crooked Attorney Jack N. Peterson, 838.022 (1)(c), Fla. Stat.

DELIBERATE DERPRIVATIONS AND PERVERSIONS OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

309. U.S. Defendant Honeywell recklessly perverted express Florida and Federal

Constitutional guarantees of, e.g., the rights to due process, equal protection of the law, to

own property, exclude Governments from private property, redress Government grievances,

prosecute by jury trial, be free of Government corruption, extortion, coercion, oppression,

falsification of records, unlawful seizure of private property under fraudulent pretenses such

as, e.g.:

a. Idiotically and brazenly, Def. Whore Honeywell manufactured and conspired with

other Government Officials to pervert express Constitutional guarantees and concoct

that property rights are not fundamental rights;

b. Def. Honeywell concocted and conspired to concoct that Plaintiffs could not assert their

perfected state claims against U.S. Agents in U.S. Courts;

c. Def. Honeywell fabricated and conspired to fabricate that Defendant Forger of land

parcels Wilkinson had filed a non-existent Rule 38 motion. Here, Defendant

Honeywell falsified and caused others to falsify dockets, docket entries, and official

records. See 838.022 (1)(a), Fla. Stat.;


7/23

80

d. Def. Predator Honeywell concealed, covered up, and/or altered official records and

documents, 838.022 (1)(b), Fla. Stat.;

e. With corrupt intent to obtain illegal benefits for Lee County Officials and to harm the

Plaintiff record landowners & corruption victims, Def. Honeywell maliciously fabricated

and conspired to fabricate a regulation by nameless, un-named, and non-existent

legislators. See 838.022 (1), Fla. Stat.

OBSTRUCTION OF COURT ACCESS & FILING OF NOTICE OF APPEAL, DOC. 213

310. On or around07/16/2010, Defendant Whore Honeywell prevented and conspired with

other Officials such as, e.g., Defendant Clerks Drew Heathcoat and Diane Nipper the filing

of Plaintiffs Notice of Appeal from Order, Doc. # 213 , Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791, and

the communication of information relating to the commission of felonies in the U.S. District

Court, Fort Myers, Florida.

311. Recklessly, Honeywells illegal and felonious acts deprived the Plaintiffs of their rights

as stated in Doc. # 214, Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791.

RULE 38/WRIT OF EXECUTION-FRAUD-SCHEME, CONSPIRACY TO EXTORT

312. Pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 39, costs may be taxed against the appellant, if a judgment is

affirmed. Defendant Whore Honeywell knew and concealed that the costs allowed and/or

taxed were $24.30, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, Doc. ## 365, p. 15; 386-3, p. 15. Def.

Honeywell concealed that no costs were everallowedunder purported Rule 38.

FRIVOLOUS APPEAL-FRAUD & EXTORTION-SCHEME

313. FRAP 38, Frivolous Appeal - Damages and Costs provides that

if a court of appeals determines that an appeal is frivolous, it may, after a separatelyfiled motion or notice from the court and reasonable opportunity to respond, awardjust damages and single or double costs to the appellee.


8/23

81

314. Defendant Government Whore Honeywell knew and fraudulently concealed that pursuant

to 11th Cir. R. 38-1, Time for Filing Motions, Motions for damages and costs pursuant to

FRAP 38 must be filed no later than the filing of appellees brief. Here, Defendant Wilkinson

had tendered and/or filed his prima facie fraudulent brief on or around 08/08/2008. See

Appellate Case No. 2008-13170-BB, certified Docket sheet. Admittedly, Defendant

Wilkinson neverfiledany Rule 38 motion before 08/08/2008.

315. Admittedly, Defendant Wilkinson had never filed any Rule 38 motion. Rule 38 only

provided for damages and costs. Here, Defendant Wilkinson had neverfiledany such motion

and perpetrated fraud on the Court. See certified Docket. Defendant Government Whore

Honeywell concealed said Rule 38 motion-fraud-scheme and conspiracy to extort.

CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL ILLEGALITY & CRIMINALITY OF FAKE WRIT

316. On or around 07/14/10, Defendant corrupt U.S. Judge Honeywell conspired with, e.g.,

U.S. Defendants Chappell and Steele to fraudulently conceal the prima facie nullity and

illegality of a facially forged writ of execution and July judgment, Case No. 2:2010-cv-

00089, Doc. # 48, p. 1:

On February 1, 2010, Magistrate Judge Chappell issued an order granting DefendantKenneth M. Wilkinson's Motion for Issuance of a Writ of Execution (2:07-CV-228,Dkt. 424). Shortly thereafter, the writ was issued (2:07-CV-228, Dkt. 425).

317. Defendant crooked Honeywell fraudulently concealed and conspired to conceal that

Defendant Wilkinson had never filed any Rule 38 motion, Fed.R.App.P.

318. Defendant corrupt U.S. Judge Honeywell fraudulently concealed and conspired to

conceal that Defendant Co-conspirator Chappell had fabricated a mandate and/orjudgment,

Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, Doc. # 424:

On July 28, 2009, the Eleventh Circuit issued a Judgment awarding Wilkinson$5,000.00 in attorneys fees and double costs in the amount of $48.60, as sanctionsfor Busses pursuit of a frivolous appeal.


9/23

82

319. Defendant Honeywell fraudulently concealed and conspired to conceal that admittedly

Defendant Wilkinson had never alleged a frivolous appeal and that no mandate or

judgment awarding Wilkinson $5,000.00 in attorneys fees had ever existed, Case No.

2:2007-cv-00228.

320. In the certified record absence of any Rule 38 motion by Def. Wilkinson, a fraudulent

judgment in the amount of $24.30 issued as mandate on June 11 2009, Case No.

2:2007-cv-00228.

321. Defendant Honeywell fraudulently concealed and conspired to conceal that the mandated

amount of $24.30 had been paid and was not outstanding:

TheJudgmentto date remains outstanding.

322. Defendant Honeywell fraudulently concealed and conspired with other U.S. Agents to

conceal that

a. No such mandated judgment existed, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228;

b. No mandated judgment was ever recorded in the Public Records of Lee County;

c. The fraudulently alleged certification was facially forged;

d. Instrument No. 2009000309384 could not have possibly become any lien on any

property pursuant to Ch. 55, 56; and 55.10 Florida Statutes; and

e. No writ of execution legally existed.

323. Defendant Honeywell fraudulently concealed and conspired with U.S. Defendants

Chappell, Steele, and other U.S. Agents to conceal that nothing in that or any other Case

could havepossibly served as a lien against any property under Florida and Federal law:

A certified copy of the Judgment was recorded in the Public Records of Lee County,

Florida at Instrument No. 2009000309384 andserves as a lien against the property.


10/23

83

324. Defendant Honeywell fraudulently concealed and conspired to conceal that

a. Defendant Wilkinson had neverfiledany Rule 38 motion;

b. Kenneth M. Wilkinson had never been awardedany mandatedjudgment;

c. Def. Wilkinson was not entitled to tax.;

d. The prima facie fraudulent Writ was due to be denied as unlawful and unauthorized.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF JURISDICTION & FRAUD ON THIS COURT

325. On or around 06/23/10, Defendant Honeywell fraudulently concealed the jurisdiction of

this Court over the unlawful acts of the Defendant U.S. Agents and recklessly deprived the

Plaintiffs of any chance of justice and adjudication of their perfected claims, Doc. # 213:

B. Supplemental Jurisdiction

The decision to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over pendent state claims restswithin the discretion of the district court.Raney v. Allstate Ins. Co., 370 F.3d 1086,1088-89 (11th Cir. 2004). Once a district court dismisses all claims over which it hadoriginal jurisdiction, it may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over theremaining state claims. 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(3). This Court, therefore, declines toexercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs remaining state claims.

326. Defendant Honeywell knew and fraudulently concealed that this Court had jurisdiction of

any and all claims involving the Defendant U.S. Government Officials and including state

claims. Defendant Honeywell had no discretion but was absolutely obligated to adjudicate

Plaintiffs claims, because United States Agents had perpetrated unlawful and criminal acts

of record.

327. Defendant Honeywell knew and concealed that Co-Defendant U.S. Judges Steele and

Chappell themselves had removed Plaintiffs State action, 2006-CA-003185, BUSSE v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, to Federal Court. See 2:2008-cv-00899.

328. Declining jurisdiction over unlawful and criminal U.S. Governmental acts proved

Defendant Honeywells fraud on the Courts and required her disqualification.


11/23

84

RECKLESS OBSTRUCTION OF COURT ACCESS

DISPARATE DENIAL OF COURT ACCESS RIGHTS

329. Recklessly, Defendant Honeywell again obstructed Plaintiffs court access on 06/23/10,

Doc. # 213, p. 21:

With its discretionary authority, the Court declines to exercise supplementaljurisdiction over Plaintiffs state claims.

OBSTRUCTION OF COURT ACCESS UNDER FALSE PRETENSES OF misconduct

330. On 07/07/10, Defendant Honeywell again fabricated misconduct and/or loss of

electronic filing privileges in response to Plaintiffs specific demand for equal court

access and privileges for filing purposes. See Case No. 2:2010-cv-00089, Doc. # 38, p. 1;

see Def. Honeywells previous fabrications, Case No. 2:09-CV-791, Doc. ## 133, 151.

RECORD CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE & ADJUDICATION

331. Defendant Honeywell conspired with other Defendant U.S. Judges and Officials not to

justly and speedily adjudicate Plaintiffs conclusively proven state claims against Federal

Defendants.

DENIAL & FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF EQUAL PROTECTION RIGHTS

332. On or around 06/23/2010, Defendant Honeywell recklessly and disparately denied the

Plaintiffs the equal protection of the laws under fraudulent pretenses, Doc. # 213, p. 19:

In this case, Plaintiffs claim that they were denied equal protection of the laws byDefendants in relation to Lot 15A. As a general matter, Florida counties may exerciseeminent domain over property not owned by the state or federal government. Fla.Stat. 127.01(1)(a); id. Since a state landowner would not be subject to eminentdomain power but [Plaintiffs], as . . . [alleged] private landowner[s], would be,Plaintiffs cannot be similarly situated to a state landowner. Busse, 317 Fed. Appx. at973. Plaintiffs, therefore cannot rely on [their] disparate eminent domain treatmentvis-a-vis state landowners as the basis for an equal protection claim. Id.Consequently, the Court finds that Plaintiffs failed to state a claim upon which reliefcan be granted and dismisses their Equal Protection claim.


12/23

85

333. In exchange for Defendants bribes, Defendant Honeywell fixed and fraudulently

concealed Plaintiffs perfected equal protection claim and the record absence of any

eminent domain exercise. On 06/23/2010, Defendant Honeywell fraudulently concealed

that none of the Government Defendants ever had any eminent domain power and

perpetrated fraud on the Court.

CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL U.S. JURISDICTION & OBSTRUCT COURT ACCESS

334. Defendant Honeywell conspired with other Federal Defendants to conceal Federal

jurisdiction and obstruct Plaintiffs meaningful court access.

335. In particular, Defendant Honeywell conspired to conceal that of course, the Plaintiffs

rightfully prosecuted 1st, 14

th, 4

th, 7

thand 5

thAmendment violations by Federal Defendants in

Federal Court.

336. On or around 06/23/10, Defendant U.S. Judge Honeywell fabricated necessary state

procedures, Doc. # 213, p. 18:

They have not exhausted the necessary state procedures to address their disputeprior to filing in federal court. Therefore, the Court finds that Plaintiffs failed to statea claim upon which relief can be granted and dismisses their Seventh Amendmentclaim.

337. Defendant Honeywell knew and fraudulently concealed that Plaintiffs prosecution of

Federal Defendants forSeventh AmendmentViolations did of course not require necessary

state procedures. Brazenly and idiotically, Defendant Honeywell concocted necessary

state procedures on the record. Said reckless fabrications were outside Honeywells scope

ofimmunity and officialcapacity.


13/23

86

DELIBERATE DEPRIVATIONS OF COURT ACCESS UNDER FALSE PRETENSES

338. Without any meritorious defense or claim, and under facially idiotic pretenses of

frivolity and vexatiousness, Defendant Honeywell deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs of

court access.

CONCEALMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO OWN PROPERTY AND

CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL THAT PROPERTY RIGHTS ARE FUNDAMENTAL

339. Defendant Honeywell conspired to fraudulently conceal that property rights are most

fundamental rights. On or around 06/23/2010, Defendant Honeywell conspired to brazenly

and irrationally concoct, Doc. # 213, p. 20:

Property rights would not be fundamental rights since they are based on state law.Id. Here, Plaintiffs claim that they have been denied their alleged property rights inLot 15A. These property rights are defined by state law. Therefore, the Court findsthat Plaintiffs failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and dismissestheir Substantive Due Process Claim.

340. No halfway intelligent and non-corrupt judge in Defendant Honeywells shoes could

havepossibly denied that property rights and the right to own property are most fundamental

rights. Honeywells above assertion was recklessly false and for unlawful and criminal

purposes of extorting property and fees and illegally bypassing due process and equal

protection of the law.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF PLAINTIFFS PREVIOUS STATE ACTION

341. Defendant Honeywell fraudulently concealed Plaintiffs State action, Case No. 2006-CA-

003185 (Lee County Circuit Court), BUSSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Doc. # 213, p. 15:

Although they have been previously told by the Eleventh Circuit that they mustproceed in state court prior to bringing suit in federal court for several of their claims,Plaintiffs refuse to do so and continue to re-file their complaints with additionalDefendants and claims all surrounding the same property dispute.


14/23

87

342. Defendant Honeywell conspired with other Officials such as, e.g., Defendants Steele and

Polster Chappell to conceal Plaintiffs 2006 State action of record, 2006-CA-003185.

Defendant Honeywell knew and concealed that Defendants Steele and Chappell had removed

Plaintiffs record 2006 State action to Federal Court. See 2:2008-cv-00899.

343. Defendant Honeywell knew and concealed Plaintiffs fundamental entitlement to sue

Defendant U.S. Agents in Federal Court for any and all claims.

06/23/2010 SLANDER OF RECORD REAL PROPERTY TITLE, DOC. # 213

344. On or around 06/23/2010, Defendant Honeywell unintelligently slandered Plaintiffs

record marketable title to riparian Lot 15A, Cayo Costa, Doc. # 213, 2:2009-cv-00791:

In a resolution adopted in December 1969 by the Board of Commissioners of LeeCounty, Florida, Lot 15A, among other property, was claimed as public land(Resolution 569/875") (Dkt 5, Ex. 3, p. 9). See Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, etal., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009);Busse, et al. v. Lee County,Florida, et al., 317 Fed. Appx. 968, 970 (11

th Cir. Mar 5, 2009).

07/14/2010 FABRICATION OF WRIT OF EXECUTION

345. On or around 07/14/2010, Defendant Honeywell irrationally fabricated a writ of

execution, Doc. # 48, p. 1, 2:2010-cv-00089:

In the motion, Plaintiffs appear to seek a release of the writ of execution andattachment of a lien to property issued inBusse v. Lee County, Florida, et al., Case No. 2:07-CV-228-FtM-29SPC. That case was before Judge John Steele andMagistrate Judge Sheri Chappell.

346. Defendant Honeywell knew and concealed the record lack of any writ of execution

mandated July 2009 judgment, and of any Rule 38 motion by Def. land parcel Forger

Wilkinson. See Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228; see Case Docket as certified on 07/16/2010 by

Def. Clerk D. Nipper.


15/23

88

347. Defendant Honeywell knew and concealed that the record 03/05/2009 judgment and

paid amount of $24.30 issued as mandate on 06/11/2009, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228,

had ruled out any possibility of a writ of execution.

348. Because of her irrational contradictions on record, Defendant Honeywells orders were

facially arbitrary, capricious, incomprehensible, and idiotic:

349. In particular, no rational, competent, and honest judge in Defendant Honeywells shoes

could havepossibly reconciled a fake writ of execution with a fake claim.

350. Defendant Honeywell knew and concealed that in the hypothetical event of any

involuntary title transferto Government, no writ of execution could havepossibly existed.

351. Defendant Honeywell knew and concealed that in the hypothetical event of a writ of

execution, there could not havepossibly been any involuntary title transferto Lee County,

Florida. For bribes, Def. Whore Honeywell conspired to extort Plaintiffs property under

fraudulent pretenses of a non-existent Rule 38 motion, fake judgment, and fake writ.

TRESPASS ONTO PRIMA FACIE PRIVATE CAYO COSTA SUBDIVISION

352. Defendant Honeywells unlawful and criminal acts of record, reckless orders, Case ##

2:2009-cv-00791; and 2:2010-cv-00089, slander of title, fraudulent pretenses and/or

fabrications of a non-existent mandatedjudgment, writ of execution, lien proximately

caused unlawful and criminal trespass onto Plaintiffs private street and up lands on the Gulf

of Mexico in the private undedicated residential Cayo Costa Subdivision.

353. Defendant Honeywell knew and fraudulently concealed that the public had no

Subdivision access, because as a matter of law, the public had no right to use any of the

prima facie private street and alley easements as legally conveyed in reference to the 1912

Plat of Survey in PB 3 PG 25.


16/23

89

ILLEGAL FIRES AND ARSON

354. Defendant Honeywells reckless orders, Case ## 2:2009-cv-00791, and 2:2010-cv-00089,

slander of title, fraudulent pretenses and/or fabrications of a non-existent mandated

judgment, writ of execution, lien have been inducing the public to start unlawful fires

and perpetrate arson on private Cayo Costa Subdivision property, PB 3 PG 25 (1912).

CONSPIRACY TO COVER UP FOR GOVERNMENT CROOKS

355. Defendant Honeywell fraudulently concealed and conspired to conceal the record crimes

and illegal acts of, e.g., U.S. Defendants John E. Steele, Sheri Polster Chappell, Richard A.

Lazzara, Mark Allan Pizzo, and to cover up for said Government Crooks.

RECORD THREATS AND FABRICATIONS OF VIOLATION OF ORDER

356. On or around 07/14/20, Defendant Honeywell again threatened, intimidated, and

coerced the Plaintiffs to refrain from prosecuting Defendant Honeywell, 2:10-cv-00089, Doc.

# 49, p. 2:

Plaintiff Busse has directly violated an orderof this Court.

357. Defendant Government Whore Honeywell has been a named party Defendant, because

she, e.g., accepted Defendants bribes, fixed Plaintiffs Cases under false pretenses of a

regulation, fabricated a writ of execution, perverted the Florida and Federal

Constitutional guarantees of the most fundamental rights to own property and exclude

Governments, redress Government grievances, be free of Government corruption,

oppression, unlawful seizure of property, et al. The Plaintiff corruption victims sued Def.

Honeywell in her individual private capacity outside any immunity, because Def.

Honeywell maliciously extended, e.g., record Government extortion, corruption, and crimes


17/23

90

and unlawful acts. See, e.g., Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791, Doc. # 213, 236; Case No. 2:2010-

cv-00089, Doc. ## 48, 49, 50.

358. Under color of office, Defendant Honeywell falsified and/or caused other persons to

falsify official record and documents. See 838.022, Fla. Stat.

RECORD EXTORTION OF FEES AND PROPERTY

359. For unlawful and criminal purposes of extorting fees and Plaintiffs record property,

Defendant Honeywell fabricated a writ of execution.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF RECORD 06/11/2009 MANDATE

360. Defendant Honeywell knew and concealed that a facially fraudulent 03/05/2009

judgment issued as mandate on June 11, 2009 and was received by the U.S. District

Court on 06/15/2009. See Doc. # 365; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF CLOSURE OF CASE 08-17130-BB ON 06/11/2009

361. Defendant Honeywell knew and concealed that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th

Circuit had closed Case No. 2008-13170-BB on 06/11/2009.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF $24.30 MANDATE

362. Defendant Honeywell knew and concealed that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th

Circuit had allowed the amount of $24.30 issued as mandate on June 11, 2009

363. Defendant Honeywell knew and concealed that the amount of $24.30 was not

outstanding.

364. Defendant Honeywell knew and concealed that no writ of execution could have

possibly existed on the record.


18/23

91

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF NON-EXISTENCE OF RULE 38 MOTION

365. Defendant Honeywell knew and concealed that Defendant crooked Official Kenneth M.

Wilkinson had never filed any Rule 38 motion.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF RECORD COERCION

366. Defendant Honeywell fraudulently concealed that Defendant K. M. Wilkinson expressly

coerced the Plaintiff corruption victims to refrain from prosecution on the record. See

Wilkinsons Rule 27-4 motion.

COERCION

367. On the record, Defendant Honeywell coerced the Plaintiffs to refrain from prosecution

under color ofauthority and office.

368. Without any authority orjustification, Defendant Honeywell threatened, intimidated,

harassed, and punished the Plaintiffs on the record, including the obstruction of court

access.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF NON-EXISTENT LAND PARCELS

369. Defendant Honeywell knew and concealed that Defendant ForgerK. M. Wilkinson had

unlawfully and criminally forged land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and 07-44-21-

01-00001.0000. Defendant Honeywell knew and fraudulently concealed that said forged

parcels did not appear on the 1912 Cayo Costa Subdivision Plat of Survey in Lee

County Plat Book 3 Page 25.

370. Defendant Honeywell knew and concealed that said non-existent and forged land

parcels had never been legally described,platted, and/orconveyedin reference to said Plat

of Survey, PB 3 PG 25 (1912) and had neverexisted.


19/23

92

BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION

371. In exchange for Defendants bribes, Defendant Honeywell concealed said evident record

forgeries and covered up for Defendant K. M. Wilkinson.

372. Defendant Honeywell accepted Defendants bribes and enforced the culture and policy of

corruption in her office even though Honeywell knew that the prima facie fake writ of

execution, lien, judgment, and land parcels had never existed and could not have

possibly existed.

DELIBERATE DEPRIVATIONS & FRAUD ON THE COURT

373. With wanton disregard for Plaintiffs fundamental rights to, e.g.

a. Be free of Government racketeering, corruption, extortion, coercion, and threats;

b. Be free of unlawful seizure, bribery, and retaliation;

c. Redress Government grievances without retaliation, coercion, extortion, and threats;

d. Have meaningful and free court access;

e. Have due process and equal protection of the law;

f. Own property;

g. Exclude Defendant Governments from Plaintiffs record property.

Defendant Honeywell perpetrated fraud on the Court and deliberately deprived the

Plaintiffs of theirexpress fundamental rights under the Federal and Florida Constitutions.

DEF. HONEYWELLS PROSECUTION UNDER CIVIL RICO

374. The Civil RICO statute, 18 U.S.C. 1964, 18 U.S.C. 1961-1968, expressly

authorized civil remedies. Defendant Racketeer Honeywell perpetrated record RICO

predicate acts such as, e.g., extortion, obstruction of justice, and retaliation.


20/23

93

375. Defendant Honeywell knew that Defendant K. M. Wilkinsons motion, Rule 27-4,

Fed.R.App.Proc., Doc. # 386-2, was for prima facie illegal and criminal purposes of

extortingmoney and property, obstructing justice, retaliating, and racketeering:

In order to discourage the Appellant [Dr. Jorg Busse] from engaging in the same practices [of having conclusively proven and exposed Government extortion,racketeering, and corruption] in this Court, the Appellee [Def. Racketeer KennethM. Wilkinson, Lee County Property Appraisers Office] would respectfully requestthat this Court require the Appellant to pay a monetary penalty into the Court forfiling his frivolous motion to strike. Id., p. 2.

Plaintiff Appellant, Dr. Jorg Busse, was entitled to defend against recorded extortion,

racketeering, corruption, and fraud.

INJURY TO PLAINTIFFS CAYO COSTA PROPERTY AND BUSINESS

376. Defendant Crooked Honeywell injured the Plaintiff record property and business owners

by reasons of publicly recorded violations of Section 1962. See Section 1964(C). Plaintiffs

are holding legal and beneficial interests in their Cayo Costa business and property, riparian

Lot 15A on the Gulf of Mexico, Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A. See Section 1961(3).

Plaintiffs demand recovery for both tangible and intangible property losses, business

interruptions, and other losses as a direct and proximate result of Defendant Honeywells

extortion, racketeering, and obstruction of justice.

18 U.S.C. 1962 VIOLATIONS

377. Pursuant to Section 1964(C), Plaintiffs suffered damages by reason of Defendant

Honeywells Section 1962 violations, which proximately and directly resulted from the

publicly recorded commissions of the predicate acts such as, e.g., extortion, retaliation,

fraud, fraud on the State and Federal Courts, fraudulent concealment of facially forged land

parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and 07-44-21-01-00001.0000 under color of a fake

writ of execution, fake judgment, fake debt, fake $5,048.60 debt, fake ripeness


21/23

94

requirements, et al. See Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, Doc. ## 434, 432, 424, 422, 386, 338,

288, 282, 360, 87, 25, 5.

CONSPIRACY TO CORRUPTLY GAIN CONTROL OF PLAINTIFFS PROPERTY

378. Defendant Honeywell acquired control and conspired with other Officials to acquire

control of Plaintiffs Lee County property and business through, e.g., organized crime such

as, e.g.:

a. Exercising various forms ofextortion;

b. Acquiring interest in Plaintiffs property in satisfaction of illegally procured debt such

as, e.g., $5,048.60;

c. Charging & collecting Government fees and forfictitious frivolity with usurious rates;

d. Profiteering from extra-judicialcrimes and bribes.

FOR BRIBES DEFENDANT FRAUDULENTLY CONCEALED BINDING PRECEDENT

379. In exchange forbribes, Defendant Racketeer Honeywell concealed and conspired with

other Officials and U.S. Circuit & District Judges to conceal binding precedent:

WEST PENINSULAR TITLE CO. v. PALM BEACH COUNTY, 41 F.3d 1490

(11th Cir.1995); Murrell v. United States, 269 F.2d 458 (5th Cir.1959)

DEFENDANT HONEYWELLS SECTION 1962(B) LIABILITY

380. Under color of prima facie falsified writ of execution, falsified judgment, fake

$5,048.60 debt, falsified law, legislative act, regulation, resolution 569/875,

O.R. 569/875, falsified land parcels, Defendant Honeywell has been collecting an

unlawful debt to acquire and maintain an illegal interest in and control of the prima facie

illicit park enterprise in the private, undedicated, residential Cayo Costa Subdivision

as platted in 1912, PB 3 PG 25. Plaintiffs injuries flowed directly from Defendant


22/23

95

Honeywells and other Officials maintenance and acquisition of control of the park,

entertainment, and recreation enterprise, and acquisition and/or maintenance of control of

falsified land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and 07-44-21-01-00001.0000 with an

area of Hundreds of Acres along the Gulf of Mexico and Charlotte Harbor, PB 3 PG 25.

381. Section 1962(B) provides that:

It shall be unlawful for any person through a pattern of racketeering activity orthroughcollection of an unlawful debt to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly,any interest in or control of any enterprise which is engaged in, or the activities ofwhich affect, interstate or foreign commerce.

DEFENDANT HONEYWELLS SECTION 1962(C) LIABILITY & ASSOCIATION

382. Under color of prima facie falsified writ of execution, falsified judgment, fake

$5,048.60 debt, falsified law, legislative act, regulation, resolution 569/875,

O.R. 569/875, falsified land parcels, Defendant Honeywell has been collecting an

unlawful debt and participated in the conduct and affairs of said Government enterprise.

Plaintiffs injuries flowed directly from Defendant Honeywells and other Officials

participation in said recordGovernment land parcel extortion and fraud scheme, ##

12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and 07-44-21-01-00001.0000, and the participation in

Government fraud and extortion schemes of frivolity and vexatiousness.

383. Section 1962(c) provides that:

It shall be unlawful for any person employed by orassociated with any enterpriseengaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, toconduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise's affairsthrough a pattern of racketeering activity orcollection of unlawful debt.

384. The Plaintiffs proved

1. The existence of Defendant(s) entertainment and recreational enterprise affectinginterstate commerce;2. That the Defendants were associated with the State Park and Recreationenterprise;


23/23

3. That Defendant participated, either directly or indirectly, in the conduct or theaffairs of said entertainment enterprise; and4. That Defendants participated through a pattern of racketeering activity, whichincluded the allegation of at least two racketeering acts such as, e.g., extortion,bribery, obstruction of justice, and retaliation.

385. As a Judge presiding over Defendants prima facie fraudulent defenses, claims,

falsifications, and forgeries, Defendant Honeywell had a very meaningful connection

between the illegal enterprise and the racketeering and extortion of land, money, and fees

for the enterprise under color of, e.g., office and authority.

Defendant Honeywell extorted and concealed, and conspired to extort and conceal, that he

procedure on execution did not accord with the procedure of the State of Florida. See

Fed.R.Civ.P. 69. Defendant knew that Florida procedure required a recorded and certified

judgment, which here had neverexisted. The Court never had any authority to award

$5,048.60, and the judgment issued as mandate on 06/11/2009 in the amount of$24.30 had

been paid. The prima facie fraudulent affidavit by Defendant Racketeer JACK N.

PETERSON fraudulently pretended a 07/29/2009 judgment, Doc. # 432-2, Case No.

2:2007-cv-00228, which all Defendants knew, concealed, and conspired to conceal had

neverexisted. See also Ch. 55, 56, Florida Statutes.

DEFENDANT GERALD BARD TJOFLAT

RECORD LACK OF IMMUNITY

386. The Plaintiff public corruption victims are suing Defendant corrupt Gerald Bard Tjoflat

(Tjoflat) in his private individual capacity and official capacity as very old U.S. Circuit

Judge. Defendant Tjoflats unlawful and criminal acts on record were outside any immunity

and officialcapacity.

defendant charlene e. honeywell

Documents