2010-2011 campus improvement plan - central

Upload: cfbisd

Post on 07-Apr-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    1/18

    Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Improvement Plan 2010-2011Campus Plans

    CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

    Central Elementary

    CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN2010-2011

    Becky Taylor, Principal

    Vision Statement: All students shall meet or exceed the states standards to successfullytransition to middle school.

    October 1, 2010

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    2/18

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    2

    CIC MEMBERS

    Name Position Years Served SignatureBecky Taylor Principal 3Diane Fulcher Assistant Principal 1Kim Chow Assistant Principal 0Misty White ESL/Math Instructional Facilitator 4Lori Canales Reading Instructional Facilitator 3Antonio Flores Pre-K/Kinder Representative 0Norma Melvin First Grade Representative 2

    Haylene Plotnik Second/Third Grade Representative 2Assia Houston Fourth/Fifth Grade Representative 0Kari Winchester Activities/Support Team

    Representative0

    Alexis McKeever Communities in School 0Shashawn Campbell District Representative 1Dale White Business Partner 1Emma Hageman Community Representative 0Maria Uvaldo Parent Representative 1

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    3/18

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    3

    PLANNING PROCESS

    Needs Assessment

    The Campus Improvement Council is composed of representative professional staff, parents of students enrolled at the campus,business representatives and community members. The Campus Improvement Council establishes and reviews campus educationalplans, goals, performance objectives, and major classroom instructional programs. An annual Campus Improvement Plan guides thiswork. The Campus Improvement Plan is based on a comprehensive needs assessment which includes student achievementindicators, disaggregated by all student groups served by the campus. Additional factors such as school processes (e.g., attendance,graduation, tardies, discipline referrals, teacher absences), perception (e.g., staff, parent and community surveys), and demographics

    (e.g., enrollment trends, staff turnover) are to be considered.The Campus Improvement Plan is to include (TEC Chapter 11, subchapter F, section 11.253):

    1. Assessment of academic achievement for each student using the student achievement indicator system.2. Set campus performance objectives based on the student achievement indicator system, including objectives for special needs

    populations, including students in special education.3. Identification of how campus goals will be met for each student.4. Identification of resources needed to implement the plan.

    5. Identification of staff needed to implement the plan.6. Timelines for reaching goals.7. Periodic, measureable progress toward the performance objectives.8. Goals and methods for violence prevention and intervention on campus.9. Program for encouraging parental involvement.10. Goals and objectives for a coordinated health program (elementary and middle schools) which is based on student fitness data,

    student academic performance data, student attendance rates, percentage of students who are educationally disadvantaged thatensures that students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity.

    Annual analysis of the plan and review of various assessment data are used to determine objectives that address campusgoals. Specific strategies and action steps are developed to address these objectives. This process ensures a commitment toexcellence and a resolve to provide the best instructional plan for every student.

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    4/18

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    4

    Campuses receiving Title 1 funds must address Title 1 targets in campus plans and indicate where Title 1funds will be spent.

    Title I --Targeted Assisted (TA)Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program

    TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standardsTA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planningTA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based researchTA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programsTA 5. Highly qualified teachersTA 6. Professional DevelopmentTA 7. Increase Parental InvolvementTA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

    Title I -- School-wide Components (TS)TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessmentTS 2. School-wide reform strategiesTS 3. Highly qualified teachersTS 4. Professional developmentTS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high need schoolsTS 6. Parental involvementTS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programsTS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessmentsTS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basisTS10.Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    5/18

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    5

    The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

    Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievementA. TEA Recognized/Exemplary DistrictB. Recognized/Exemplary SchoolsC. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)D. Achievement GapE. Special PopulationsF. TAKS Commended Scores (all students)G. Higher Education Readiness Component (TSI) (EXIT Scores)

    H. SATI. PSAT/NMSQTJ. Advanced PlacementK. Graduation Data

    Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffA. Out of School SuspensionsB. DAEP PlacementsC. Attendance Rate

    Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectivenessA. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST)B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instructionC. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 paymentsD. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usageE. Overtime hoursF. Highly Qualified Teachers

    G. Teacher Classroom Attendance RateH. All Staff Attendance RateI. Teacher Turnover RateJ. Availability of Critical Technology Systems

    Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemA. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality TogetherB. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed)C. Staff Survey (to be developed)

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    6/18

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    6

    Improve TAKSscores on themath subtest byimproving studentperformance inunderstanding ofnumbers,

    operations andquantitativereasoning (Obj.1)and mathematicalprocesses andtools (Obj.6)

    Allsubgroupswill score90% orbetter on themath TAKSsubtest andincreasecommendedperformanceby 10%.

    3.1B use place value to compareand order whole numbers through9,999.3.11B use standard units to find theperimeter of a shape3.14B solve problems thatincorporate understanding theproblem, making a plan, carryingout the plan, and evaluating thesolution for reasonableness3.14C select or develop anappropriate problem-solving plan orstrategy, including drawing apicture, looking for a pattern,systematic guessing and checking,acting it out, making a table,working a simpler problem, orworking backwards to solve aproblem.

    4.14B Solve problems thatincorporate understanding theproblem, making a plan, carryingout the plan, and evaluating thesolution for reasonableness.4.14C select or develop anappropriate problem-solving plan orstrategy, including drawing apicture, looking for a pattern,systematic guessing and checking,acting it out, making a table,working a simpler problem, or

    working backwards to solve aproblem.4,15B relate informal language to

    mathematical language andsymbols.4.16A make generalizations frompatterns or sets of examples andnonexamples.

    RESULTSGOAL

    Should identifywhat is desired

    in terms ofperformanceafter, or as a

    result of, puttingnew processes

    in place orimprovingexisting

    processes.

    SMARTGOAL

    Goal shouldbe S trategicand specific,Measurable,Attainable,

    Results-based, and

    Time-bound.

    INDICATORStandards and

    objectives (weak areas

    for students)

    MEASURESTools well use todetermine wherestudents are nowand whether they

    are improving.

    TARGETSThe attainableperformance level we

    would like to see.

    Campus commonassessments, TAKScharts, math

    journals,Investigationassessments

    Campus commonassessments,TAKSMath journals,Investigationassessments

    Increase SE performanceson TAKS3.1B from 64.7% to 90%3.11B from 61.3% to 90%3.14B from 67.05% to 90%3.14C from 67.61% to 90%

    Increase SE performance onTAKS4.14B from 70.48% to 90%4.14C from 66.87% to 90%4.15B from 67.47% to 90%4.16A from 69.28% to 90%

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    7/18

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    7

    Improve TAKSscores for allstudents on thereading subtestby improvingcritical thinkingand reading skills.

    Allsubgroupswill score90% orbetter on thereadingTAKSsubtest andincreasecommendedperformanceby 10%.

    3.14A Students analyze, makeinferences, and drawconclusions about persuasivetexts and provide evidence fromtexts to support their analysis.Students are expected to identifywhat the author is trying topersuade the reader to do orthink.

    3.13B Students are expected todraw conclusions from the factspresented in text and support thoseassertions with textual evidence.

    4.11A Students are expected tosummarize the main idea andsupporting details in texts in waysthat maintain meaning.

    4.6B Students are expected todescribe the interaction of charactersincluding their relationships and thechanges they undergo.

    4.2B Students are expected to use thecontext of the sentence to determinethe meaning of unfamiliar words ormulti-meaning words.

    RESULTSGOAL

    Should identify

    what is desiredin terms ofperformanceafter, or as a

    result of, puttingnew processes

    in place orimprovingexisting

    processes.

    SMARTGOAL

    Goal shouldbe S trategicand specific,MeasurableAttainable,

    Results-based, and Time-bound.

    MEASURESTools we will use

    to determinewhere studentsare now and

    whether they areimproving .

    TARGETSThe attainable

    performance level wewould like to see.

    Fountas-Pinnellrunning records,rubric for writtensummaries,anchor lessons-observation.

    Readingbenchmarks,ReadersResponse rubric,Rubrics forcharactermotivation

    Commonassessments,browsing boxchallenge, openended test

    Readersresponse journal rubric,Oral think-aloud

    4.11A from 70.78% to90%

    4.6B from 72.48% to 90%

    4.2B from 75.30% to 90%

    3.13B from 71.69% to90%

    3.14A from 57.83% to90%

    INDICATORStandards and

    objectives (weak areas

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    8/18

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    8

    Improve TAKSscores on thewriting subtest byincreasing studentunderstanding ofthe nature ofscience and earthsciences.

    All subgroupswill score 90%or better on thewriting TAKSsubtest andincreasecommendedperformance by10%.

    4.22B Students are expectedto spell base words and rootswith affixes.

    4.22D Students are expectedto use spelling patterns, rules,print, and electronic resourcesto determine and check correctspellings.

    4.15D Students areexpected to edit drafts forgrammar, mechanics, andspelling using a teacherdeveloped rubric.

    RESULTS

    GOALShould identifywhat is desired

    in terms ofperformanceafter, or as a

    result of, puttingnew processes

    in place orimproving

    existingprocesses.

    SMART

    GOALGoal shouldbe S trategicand specific,Measurable,Attainable,

    Results-based, and

    Time-bound.

    INDICATORStandards and

    objectives (weak areasfor students) MEASURESTools well use to

    determine wherestudents are nowand whether they

    are improving.

    TARGETSThe attainable

    performance levelwe would like to

    see.

    C-FB ISD SpellingprogramDaily reading/writingenrichment lessonsWord work study

    Word wall activitiesWeekly SpellingTestsCFBISD SpellingprogramTeacher observation

    Daily quick writeWeekly quizzesCompositionlessons/samplesDaily reading/writingconnection lessonsTeacher conferencingPeer conferencingAnecdotal records

    4.22B from 71.43% to 90%

    4.22D from 80.52% to90%

    4.15D from 83.12% to 90%

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    9/18

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    9

    Improve TAKSscores on thescience subtestby increasingstudentunderstanding ofthe nature ofscience and earthsciences.

    All subgroups

    will score 90%or better onthe science TAKSsubtest andincreasecommendedperformanceby 10%.

    5.7A Explore the processesthat lead to the formation ofsedimentary rocks and fossilfuels

    5.2G Construct appropriatesimple graphs, tables, maps,and charts using technology,including computers, toorganize, examine, andevaluate information

    5.8C Demonstrate that Earthrotates on its axis onceapproximately every 24 hrscausing the day/night cycleand the apparent movement ofthe sun across the sky

    5.8D Identify and compare thephysical characteristics of thesun, Earth and moon

    4.6A Differentiate amongforms of energy, includingmechanical, sound,electrical, light, andheat/thermal

    RESULTSGOAL

    Should identifywhat is desired

    in terms ofperformanceafter, or as a

    result of, puttingnew processes

    in place orimprovingexisting

    processes.

    SMARTGOAL

    Goal should

    be S trategicand specific,Measurable,Attainable,

    Results-based, and

    Time-bound.

    INDICATORStandards and

    objectives (weak areasfor students)

    MEASURESTools well use todetermine wherestudents are nowand whether they

    are improving.

    TARGETSThe attainable

    performance levelwe would like to

    see.

    Common assessmentsbased on SimpleScience SolutionsCPSMAPFOSS labsPLCs

    Analyzing studentwork/science journalsPerformance basedassessment rubricCommon assessmentsbased on SimpleScience SolutionsCPSPLCs

    Science journalStudent workCommon assessmentsSimple ScienceSolutionsMAPPLCs

    5.7A from 54.55% to 90%

    5.2G from 81% to 90%

    5.8C from 63.64% to 90%

    5.8D from 67.53% to 90%

    4.6A from 61.04% to 90%

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    10/18

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    10

    Activities Team Goals for 2010-2011

    In grades 3 5, we will support the homeroom teachers by reinforcing the following math, reading and writing TAKS Objectives in thesegrades.

    Objective 2: Reading :Apply knowledge of literary elements to understand culturally diverse written texts

    Action Plan: Use of song repertoires in two languagesUse of texts during PE classes about different sports, different players and their customs & culturesUse of art forms from various cultures and the making of art objects from different genres, eras, and cultures

    Objective 2: MathDemonstrate an understanding of patterns, relationships, and algebraic reasoning

    Action Plan : Use of movement and patterns in games and rhythms (dance)Use of musical icons (beats per measure/sounds on a beat)Use of game patterns and sequencing (games with numbers)Pattern creation and identification (color mixing)

    Objective 3 WritingRecognize appropriate organization of ideas in texts

    Action Plan : Writing of letters to various athletes, artists, musiciansWriting of song lyrics, game rules, critiquing of art work

    Within our own disciplines :

    Physical Education : As defined by the CIP, we will show a 2% improvement in the push up portion of the Fitnessgram test and a 3% improvementin the sit n reach portion of the Fitnessgram test scores. 3 rd grade students will create the baseline for their test data for the years to come as theytake the test for the first time.

    Art & Music : Grade levels 3 5 will continue to establish baseline test scores and/or project success rate.

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    11/18

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    11

    Central ElementaryCampus Goals & Objectives

    2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA2011 GOALS

    All Students African American Hispanic White Special Ed Economically

    DisadvantagedLEP

    INDICATOR2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    2010Data

    2011Goal

    Reading/English Language Arts 87% 90% 100% 100% 87% 90% 100% 100% 61% 90% 86% 90% 85% 90%

    Mathematics 90% 95% 100% 100% 90% 95% 100% 100% 91% 95% 90% 95% 88% 90%

    Writing 93% 95% 100% 100% 95% 95% * 100% 100% 100% 92% 95% 90% 95%

    Science 80%90%

    *100%

    80%90%

    100%100%

    100%100%

    81%90%

    63%90%

    Social Studies

    All Tests

    Graduation 2009

    Graduation 2010 Goal

    Participation: Reading/Language Arts 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

    Participation: Math 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

    Attendance 97.36 100% 97.9 100% 97.6 100% 95.4 100% 97.8 100% 97.8 100% 97.7 100%

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    12/18

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    12

    Central Elementary

    Campus Goals2010 Percentage of Commended Students2011 Goals

    All Students African American Hispanic WhiteINDICATOR

    Cam-pus State

    Diff.

    fromstate

    2011Goal

    Cam-pus State

    Diff.

    fromstate

    2011Goal

    Cam-pus State

    Diff.

    fromstate

    2011Goal

    Cam-pus State

    Diff.

    fromstate

    2011Goal

    Reading/EnglishLanguage Arts 29% 35%

    -6% 39% 75% 25% +50% 85% 28% 28% = 38% 50% 48% +2% 60%

    Mathematics 35% 37% -2% 45% 75% 23% +52% 85% 35% 31% +4% 45% 0% 47% -47% 10%

    Writing 21% 30% -9% 31% 33% 21% +8% 43% 22% 25% -3% 32% * 38% N/A 10%

    Science 33% 44% -11% 43% * 28% N/A 10% 32% 36% -4% 42% 100% 59% +41% 100%

    Social Studies

    Special Ed. Economically Disadvantaged LEP

    INDICATORCam-pus State

    Diff.fromstate

    2011Goal

    Cam-pus State

    Diff.fromstate

    2011Goal

    Cam-pus State

    Diff.fromstate

    2011Goal

    Reading/EnglishLanguage Arts 23% 17%

    +6% 33% 27% 26% +1% 37% 17% 23% -6% 27%

    Mathematics 20% 17% +3% 30% 34% 28% +6% 34% 24% 25% -1% 34%

    Writing 0% 11% -11% 10% 21% 22% -1% 32% 9% 20% -11% 19%

    Science 0% 24% -24% 10% 33% 33% = 43% 13% 20% -7% 23%

    Social Studies

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    13/18

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    13

    Central Elementary2010-11 Campus Focus

    District Supporting Objective #1: Continuously increase student achievement

    Campus Focus # 1 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureMinimum of 90% of all students will pass the reading, math, writing andscience subtests on TAKS

    D, E

    Minimum of 25% commended for all subpops F

    Campus rating of Exemplary from TEA in 2011 B

    Improve student achievement

    Campus Focus # 2 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureMinimum of 50% of students will meet target growth in reading as measuredby spring 2011 MAP

    B, C

    Students not meeting target growth in reading as measured by spring 2011MAP will miss their target by no more than 2 RITs

    B, C

    Increase number of studentsreading on grade level

    Campus Focus # 3 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureUsing 09-10 as a baseline, increase the Healthy Fitness Zone for the Push Upsto 75% and the Sit N Reach to 70% (10-11 third grade students will establishtheir baseline testing).

    Increase student fitness

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    14/18

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    14

    Central Elementary

    2010-11 Campus Focus

    District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

    Campus Focus #4 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureDecrease office referrals by 10% A, BDecrease incidents of alleged sexual harassment and pre-gang association by10%

    A, BIncrease staff and studentsafety.

    Campus Focus #? Criteria for Success Performance Measure

    Campus Focus #? Criteria for Success Performance Measure

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    15/18

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    15

    Central Elementary2010-11 Campus Focus

    District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness

    Campus Focus #5 Criteria for Success Performance Measure3% reduction in electricity usage per month. DDecrease energy consumption.

    Campus Focus #? Criteria for Success Performance Measure

    Campus Focus #? Criteria for Success Performance Measure

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    16/18

    Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

    16

    Central Elementary2010-11 Campus Focus

    District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

    Campus Focus # 6 Criteria for Success Performance Measure10% increase in PTA membership A10% increase in parent volunteers A10% increase in parent attendance in curriculum/parent ed events A

    Increase parent involvement

    Campus Focus #? Criteria for Success Performance Measure

    Campus Focus #? Criteria for Success Performance Measure

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    17/18

  • 8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Central

    18/18