wp6 evaluation

Download WP6 Evaluation

Post on 12-Jan-2016

29 views

Category:

Documents

0 download

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

WP6 Evaluation. EuroHealthNet. Cristina Chiotan Public Health Coordinator. 41 members and partners in 27 European countries. NORWAY: Norwegian Directorate of Health POLAND: National Institute of Hygiene Public Health Research Institute - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

  • WP6 EvaluationEuroHealthNet

    Cristina ChiotanPublic Health Coordinator

  • AUSTRIA: Austrian Health Promotion FoundationBELGIUM: Flemish Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention BULGARIA: National Centre of Public Health ProtectionCROATIA:National Institute of Public HealthCZECH REPUBLIC: National Institute of Public HealthDENMARK: National Board of Health UK: Department of Health Kent & Medway NHS North West Health OfficeESTONIA: National Institute for Health DevelopmentFRANCE: National Institute for Prevention and Health Education (INPES)FINLAND: Finnish Centre for Health PromotionGERMANY: Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA)GREECE: Institute of Preventive Medicine, Environmental & Occupational Health Prolepsis FINLAND:National Institute for Health and WelfareFinnish Society for Social and Health - SOSTEHUNGARY: Hungarian National Institute for Health Development (OEFI) University of DebrecenITALY: Veneto RegionLATVIA: The Centre of Health EconomicsNETHERLANDS: NIGZ: Netherlands Institute for Health Promotion RIVM: Netherlands Institute Public Health and the Environment

    41 members and partners in 27 European countriesNORWAY: Norwegian Directorate of Health POLAND: National Institute of Hygiene Public Health Research Institute ROMANIA: Institute of Public Health IasiSCOTLAND: NHS Health ScotlandSLOVAKIA: Public Health Authority of the Slovak RepublicSLOVENIA: National Institute of Public Health Institute of Public Health Murska SobotaSPAIN: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo Universidad de La Laguna

    SWEDEN: Stockholm County CouncilSWITZERLAND: Health Promotion SwitzerlandWALES: Public Health WalesIRELANDInstitute of Public HealthMONTENEGROInstitute of Public HealthROMANIANational Institute of Public HealthSWEDENSwedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions

  • - Reducing Health Inequalities- Combat NCDs- Health Promotion for sustainable health systems

    Policy developmentProject participationNetworkingCommunication

  • Health Inequalities are persistent and increasing

  • PHASE

    The European Platform for Action on Health & Social Equity

    HPEHealth Promotion Europe

    The European Network for Health Promotion

    CIRI

    The European Centre for Innovation, Research & Implementation in Health & Wellbeing

  • EvaluationWHY?To support Consortium performance;To collectively identify and respond to problems;To maximise impact and ensure sustainability. HOW?Through projects products, interviews and questionnairesWHO?All project partners

  • AHA.SI EvaluationDraft Evaluation Framework based on projects work-plan, timeframe, deliverables including process, output and outcome indicators to be commented by WP leads and agreed by all

    Guiding Principles for Active Ageing and Solidarity between Generations;The Active Ageing Index;Social Investment Package.

  • AHA.SI Evaluation Review processes: meetings, event reports; questionnaires and interviews;Analyse outputs: schedule and content (3 external experts);Assess outcomes: stakeholders views on impact

    3 interim reports and one final report

  • Logic model:More seniors employed

    More active and healthy seniors

    More LTCHigher public awareness

    Feasibility of Strategy

    Cooperation health and social sectorspolicy..Networking

    Awarenesscampaign

    Strategy (3 position papers)Networking

    Conferences

    Review of best practices

    Situation analysis

  • ExamplesSpecific objective:Network of different sectors at different levels

    Process indicators: no. of meetings organised, reports, etc.; Output indicators: satisfaction and impact; follow up colaborations (questionnaires, interviews)Outcome indicators: the network allows better strategy implementation (interviews)

  • ExamplesSpecific objective:Greater public and target groups awareness

    Process indicators: campaign, communication (WP5 products)Output indicators: no. of people reached, materials produced, no. of events dissemination etc. Outcome indicators: public awareness evaluation study

  • Short-term outcomes:public awareness

    ComponentsIndicatorsMethodcontextAspects that may have an influence on the campaignReach% of population (subgroups?) having heard of the campaignDose deliveredNumber and type of messages deliveredDose received% of population (subgroups?) aware of Or agree with the new strategy?

    fidelityDegree to which the messages reflected well the strategy

  • Example: networking

    ComponentsIndicatorsMethodintentionKnowing counterpartTrust

    QInterview ***activitiesExchange of newslettersCabinet committeesJoined budgetingDelegated financingHealth conferences (collaborative governance)Industry engagement

  • Thank you!Cristina Chiotanc.chiotan@eurohealthnet.eu Ingrid Stegemani.stegeman@eurohealthnet.eu

    Cristina ChiotanPublic Health Coordinator