washoeleadership
DESCRIPTION
Presented May 6, 2010TRANSCRIPT
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 1
Bret L Simmons, Ph.D.Assistant Professor of
Management, UNRwww.bretlsimmons.com
www.slideshare.net/bretlsimmons
What are we going to do today?
• Turn ALL cell phones OFF• Relax!• Keep an open mind• Ask questions• Interact with me and your
colleagues
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 2
Agenda•Breaks 1.5 to 2 hours•Lunch 11:30
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 3
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 4
Creative Tension
Goal/Ideal“the way things could be”
Current State“the way things are”
Gap Delay
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 5
Topics Today• Behavior• Leadership• Purpose• Change• Followership• Assertive
Communication
6
Exercise 1: Behavior at work
• Introduce yourself• What things do people do at
work to perform their jobs?• What other things do people do that are not part of their job performance?
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 7
Behavior At Work
Task Behaviors Extra-Role Behaviors
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 8
Always remember….
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 8
Behavior is a function of both the person
and the environment
(system).B = f (P/E)
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 9
Why it mattersYour explanation for the behavior
that you observe (caused by a combination of person and environment factors) is critical because it determines your reaction to the behavior, and the thing you control the most at work is your own personal behavior.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 10
• Think of an example at work where a behavior is strongly influenced by a process.
• What changes could you make to the process to get a different behavior?
• How much authority do you have to make those changes to the process?
Exercise 2: B = f (P/E)
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 11Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 11
“When we attribute behavior to people rather than system structure, the focus of management becomes the search for extraordinary people to do the job rather than designing the job so that ordinary people can do it.”
(Sterman, 1994)
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 12
What is the single best predictor of work performance across many occupations studied in both the US and many different cultures?
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 12
13
Single Best Predictor of Performance
General Mental Ability
(Intelligence)
Ok, so what?Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 14
Implications• Talent is NOT fixed unless you
believe that it is. Treat talent as something almost everyone can earn, not that just a few people own.
• Everyone can learn to work smarter
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 14
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 15
Implications• When problems occur:–Impression Management
or–Opportunity to learn
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 15
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 16
Implications
The law of crappy systems trumps the law of crappy people
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 16
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 17
Implications• Wisdom, not intelligence,
is probably the most important talent for sustaining organizational performance
• Encourage people to be nosy and noisy - it promotes wisdom
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 17
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D.
Pfeffer & Sutton (2006) The talents of wisdom: people who sustain organizational learning• Noisy complainers: Repair
problems right away and then let every relevant person know that the system failed
• Noisy troublemakers: always point out others’ mistakes, but do so to help them and the system learn, not to point fingers (purposeful vs. egocentric)
18
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 19
Pfeffer & Sutton (2006) The talents of wisdom: people who sustain organizational learning• Mindful error-makers: Tell managers
about their own mistakes, so that others can avoid making them too. When others spot their errors, they communicate learning – not making the best impression – is their goal.
• Disruptive questioners: won’t leave well enough alone. They constantly ask why things are done the way they are done. Is there a better way of doing things?
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 20
What are the TWO next best
predictors of performance?
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 20
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 21
Next Best Predictors of Performance
• Job Satisfaction•Organizational Commitment
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 2222
Overall Job Attitude•Satisfaction•Commitment
Individual Effectiveness •Task performance•Extra-role performance (OCB)•Lateness•Absenteeism•Turnover
Conclusion: A sound measurement of overall job attitude is one of the most useful pieces of information an organization can have about its employees
Harrison, D.A., Newman, D.A., Roth, P.L. 2006. How important are job attitudes?
23
Job Satisfaction
What are the most common things (5) that people have degrees of satisfaction with at work?
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D.
24
Job Satisfaction (P or E?)
• Pay• Opportunity for promotion• Supervision• Co-workers• The work itself
• Which are the most important?Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 25
Organizational Commitment 1.A belief in the goals and
values of the organization.2.A willingness to put forth
effort on behalf of the organization.
3.A desire to remain a member of the organization.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 26
Organizational Commitment (P or E?)
Job satisfaction Participation Job security Job characteristics
(autonomy, responsibility, interesting work)
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D.27
Leadership• What makes a good leader?
• What makes a good follower?
• Is there a crisis in leadership today? If so, what is it?
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D.28
Management vs. Leadership
ManagersDo things right
Masters of existing routinesEfficiency
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D.29
Management vs. Leadership
LeadersDo the right thingVision and judgment
Effectiveness
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 30
Leadership vs. Management
To do the right thing, a leader needs to understand what it takes to do things right
(Bob Sutton)
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D.31
Action Memo • Leadership is an everyday way of
acting and thinking that has little to do with a title or formal position in an organization.
• Recognize the opportunities for leadership all around you and act like a leader to influence others and bring about changes for a better future.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D.32
LeadershipAn influence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes that reflect their shared purpose.
(Daft, 2002)
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D.33
Exercise: PurposeWhat is your organization’s
mission?What is your organization’s
vision?WHY do you do these
things?
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 34
Purpose: The Missing Factor
Mission – who, when, how we will get there
Vision – where we are goingValues – rules of engagement
and norms of behaviorPurpose – why we do what we
do
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 35
Examples of Purpose
University of Texas Austin:
To transform lives for the benefit of society
Mary Kay Cosmetics:
Enhancing the lives of women around the world
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 36
Purpose• Never changes• Short and easy for all to remember• Serve as a guide for everyone’s
daily behavior• When reasonable people disagree
on the “right thing to do”, purpose should be the guiding principle
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 37
Followers and leaders both orbit around the purpose, followers do not orbit around the leader. But if the purpose is not clear and motivating, leaders and followers can only pursue their perceived self-interest, not their common interest.
Purpose
Leadership and Change• Change requires leadership• Leadership necessitates
change• Successful leadership
requires continuous personal change
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D.
38
Sacred Cows• The barriers to change that everybody
knows about but that nobody talks about. They are the policies and procedures that have outlived their usefulness – but that no one dares touch
• What are the biggest sacred cows in your organization?
• What is it that keeps people from leading these sacred cows to pasture? What are the barriers to change in your organization?
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 39
Driving out fear during hard times
• Prediction: Give people as much information as possible about what will happen to them and when it will happen
• Understanding: Give people detailed information about why actions, especially actions that upset and harm them, were taken
40
• Control: Give people as much influence as possible over what happens, when things happen, and the way things happen to them; let them make as many decisions about their own fate as possible
• Compassion: Convey sympathy and concern for the disruption, emotional distress, and financial burdens that people face
41
Driving out fear during hard times
Exercise #3: Fear• How pervasive is the climate of
fear in your organization and how damaging are the effects?
• Why does the climate of fear exist? What is driving and sustaining fear?
• What can you do about it?
How to spot an asshole (Sutton, 2007)
1. After talking to the alleged asshole, does the ‘target” feel oppressed, humiliated, de-energized, or belittled by the person? In particular, does the target feel worse about him or herself?
2. Does the alleged asshole aim his or her venom at people who are less powerful rather than at those people who are more powerful? (Kiss up, kick down)
Sutton’s “Things I believe” (some)
• Getting a little power can turn you into an insensitive, self-centered jerk
• Avoid pompous jerks whenever possible. They not only can make you feel bad about yourself, chances are you will eventually start acting like them
• The best test of a person’s character is how he or she treats those with less power
• The best single question for testing an organization’s character is: What happens when people make mistakes?
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 45
Leadership: once again• Do the right thing• An influence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes that reflect their shared purpose.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 46
Exercise #4
• Individually, then in groups:–What is the biggest opportunity for
improvement that you see in your organization?
–What is your suggestion to your leader for how to address that opportunity?
• Pick a leader to role play with me
47
•Leaders usually lead as they are led.
•You will probably lead the way that you follow.
What do you think?
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D.
Effective Followers
Effective followers are active, responsible, autonomous in their behavior, and critical in thinking without being disrespectful (?) or insubordinate (?).
48
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 49
Effective Followers• Practice self-management and self-
responsibility. Do not require close supervision.
• Other-centered, committed to the organization and its purpose. Not self-centered or self-aggrandizing.
• Invest in competence and professionalism (they assume the responsibility to develop themselves)
• Courageous, honest, credible
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 50
Effective Followers
As a follower, you are responsible for your behavior, not the reaction of your leaders and peers. Do the right thing.
51
Effective Followers
What about loyalty?
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 52
Loyalty Both leaders and followers are
entering into a contract to pursue the common purpose within the context of their values. The loyalty of each is to the purpose and to helping each other stay true to that purpose.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 53
At its best, leadership is shared among leaders and followers, with everyone fully engaged and accepting higher levels of responsibility and accountability to each other (Daft, 2002)
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 54
Courageous Followership
• Courage: The ability to step forward through fear– Accepting responsibility– Nonconformity– Push beyond your comfort zone– Ask for what you want and say what you think– Fight for what you believe
• Whether leading or following, strive to encourage, not discourage those around you
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 55
Courage of the followerAn individual who is not afraid to
speak and act on the truth as she perceives it, despite external inequities, is a force to be reckoned with.
Because courage implies risk, you should develop contingency plans
“Courage muscle” develops to the degree that we exercise it.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 56
Courageous Followership Effective followership requires the courage
(Chaleff, 2009): To assume responsibility To serve To challenge To participate in transformation To take moral action, and possibly even
leave Effective leadership requires the courage to
listen to followers
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 57
Courageous Followership
All of the following material on courageous followership (slides 57- 81) is based on the work of Ira Chaleff (2009) The Courageous Follower: Standing Up To And For Our Leaders
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 58
Courage to assume responsibility
(look inside yourself first)• Assume responsibility for themselves
and the organization• Do not hold a paternalistic image of the
leader or the organization• Initiate values-based, purposeful
action to improve processes• The “authority” to initiate comes from
the courageous follower’s understanding and ownership of the common purpose, and from the needs of those the organization serves.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 59
• “By assuming responsibility for our organization and its activities, we can develop a true partnership with our leader and sense of community with our group. This is how we maximize our own contribution to the common purpose. Assuming responsibility requires courage because we then become responsible for the outcomes – we can’t lay the blame for our action or inaction elsewhere. But before we can assume responsibility for the organization, we must assume responsibility for ourselves”
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 60
Unless and until you assume full
responsibility for yourself, you force others to assume responsibility for
you
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 61
Courage to assume responsibility for yourself
• Interdependent relationships: when every one assumes responsibility for themselves
• Dependent relationships: follower does not assumer responsibility for himself or the leader does not acknowledge the follower’s responsible behavior
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 62
• Do your people come to you with complaints or suggestions that they then expect you to resolve?
• Or do your people come to you with suggestions for improvement that they are willing to take some leadership in implementing?
Courage to assume responsibility for yourself
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 63
Followership style• Partner: high support, high challenge
– Risk taker, purpose driven, holds self and others accountable, confronts sensitive issues, peer relations with authority
• Implementer: high support, low challenge– Dependable, supportive, defender, team
oriented, compliant, respectful of authority• Individualist: low support, high challenge
– Confrontational, self-assured, independent thinker, self-marginalizing, unintimidated by authority
• Resource: low support, low challenge– Present, uncommitted, executes minimum
requirements, makes complaints to third parties, avoids the attention of authority.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 64
Rhetoric of Partnership• Partner followers don’t “dump” on
leaders– “This sucks (and so do you) and YOU
need to fix it. What’s wrong with you?”• Partner followers challenge the leader,
but also try to share responsibility with the leader for correcting the situation– “This does not seem to be working and I
think we can do better. Have you considered these alternatives/options? Here is what I would be willing to do to help.”
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 65
Paradox of Partnership• The only way to develop your
partnership skills is to practice them, and you may not be (probably won’t be) invited to be a partner.
• Your responsibility to practice partnership is independent of your invitation to do so.
• You won’t encourage partnership as a leader unless you have practiced partnership as a follower.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 66
Think about it• When was the last time your challenged your
supervisor’s behavior or policies? Why did you do it? What were the results?
• Do you have any partner followers? Share a specific example with the group. – If you don’t have any partner followers, why
not? Discuss the implications with your group
– If you do have partners, why do they behave like that? Again, what are the implications of having these folks?
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 67
Improving the Process• Stop thinking its not your problem.
Realize it is your responsibility.• Courageous followers don’t just tell the
leader “something should be done about this,” adding to the burden of leadership, but present ideas for improving the process that the leader can consider and they offer to help with the implementation.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 68
Eliciting Feedback
•Focus on performance and behavior – things that you can control and change
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 69
Courage to Serve the Purposeful Leader (Look outside yourself)
• Assume new or additional responsibilities to unburden the leader and serve the organization
• Stand up for the leader and the tough decisions a leader must make for the org. to achieve its purpose
• Are as passionate as the leader in pursuing the common purpose
• Stay alert for areas in which their strengths complement the leader’s and assert themselves in these areas.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 70
Courage to challenge (the leader that has wandered off
purpose)• Give voice to the discomfort they feel when the
behaviors or policies of the leader or group conflict with their sense of what is right with respect to the purpose
• Willing to stand up, stand out, to risk rejection, to initiate conflict in order to examine the actions of the leader and group when appropriate
• Willing to deal with the emotions their challenge evokes in the leader and group
• Value organizational harmony, but not at the expense of the common purpose and their integrity
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 71
Courage to Challenge• Conditioned for others to be responsible for
our behavior but we are not held responsible for theirs.
• Immature leaders surround themselves with followers that kowtow to them.
• Skillful followers confront a leader in a way that simultaneously respects the accomplished adult, preserves the adult’s self-esteem, and challenges the immature behavior.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 72
Courage to Challenge
• Should be willing to challenge a leader’s behavior and policies – behavior is the most difficult
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 73
Challenging indirectly• Find ways to engage rather than
alarm the leader.• Questions to shift perspective:
“Is there another way we can look at this situation?”
• Anticipating questions others might ask of the leader about her policy: “How would we respond to the concern that….”
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 74
Courage to Challenge• Avoiding knee-jerk rejection
– Don’t ask for and don’t expect an immediate action or decision – allow time for the leader to “think about it”
– Keep the door open for the leader to reflect
• The duty to obey– If we choose to continue being a
follower of this leader and if the policies are not morally repugnant to us, we have the responsibility to implement the policies.
– We have the right to challenge policies, but do not have the right to sabotage implementation.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 75
Courage to Challenge
• Challenge abuse early• Challenging the use of language• Arrogance – leaders believe they are
qualitatively different from their followers
• Leaders who scream• Personal issues (e.g. infidelities,
sexual harassment, substance abuse)
• Leaders who won’t challenge their leaders
• Challenge thyself, too – BEFORE challenging the leader.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 76
The courage to listen to followers• Do you really want courageous followers?
– May say one thing, but behavior and polices encourage other behaviors from followers
– Acid test: do followers actually come to you with tough issues about corporate issues or your own behavior and policies?
• What messages are number twos sending?– Responsible not only for the cultural and
moral tone you set personally, but also for the tone set by those with whom you surround yourself. (example)
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 77
Courage to Listen to Followers
• Appreciating constructive challenge more– Do you really appreciate staff who
challenge the way in which you are leading?
– Create a climate in which you hear and pay attention to tough feedback.• Examine your own beliefs about authority,
what is and is not appropriate to say to those in authority
• Reflect on your comfort with criticism
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 78
Courage to Listen to Followers
• If you react defensively when criticized, you are unlikely to hear further about the matter or to hear further from the individual.
• A requisite of good leadership is to override naturally defensive feelings, statements, and behaviors, and display genuine interest in what sources of critical feedback are telling you.
• Demonstrate responsiveness to feedback
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 79
Courage to Listen to Followers
• Inviting creative challenge–Proactive vs. reactive–Distinguish between challenge to your authority and challenge to your ideas
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 80
Courage to Listen to Followers
• When leaders present their own ideas for action before giving their team a chance to generate a range of options, they inhibit further dialogue.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 81
A culture of communication, not complaints
• Complaints should be taken to the person or persons who need to be addressed for it to be resolved.
• Are there complaints about you that you are not hearing?
• Leaders that listen to complaints are colluding with the dysfunctional culture.
• If you listen to complaints, you are creating dependent, not interdependent relationships
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 82
Assertive Communication
• The ability to communicate clearly and directly what you need or want from another person in a way that does not deny or infringe upon the other’s rights.
• Use I-statements rather than you-statements; produce dialogue rather than defensiveness.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 83
Assertive vs. Aggressive
Assertive Aggressive
Verbal Statement of wants. Honest statement of feelings. Direct statements which say what you mean. I statements.
“Loaded” words. Accusations. Subjective terms. “You” statements that blame or label
Nonverbal general demeanor
Attentive listening. Generally assured manner, communicating caring support.
Exaggerated show of strength. Flippant, sarcastic style.Air of superiority.
Voice Firm, warm, well modulated, relaxed Tensed, shrill, loud, shaky; cold, demanding; superior, authoritarian
Eyes Open, frank, direct. Eye contact, but not glaring or staring
Expressionless, narrowed, cold, glaring; not really “seeing” others
Stance and posture
Well balanced, straight on, open, erect, relaxed
Hands on hips, arms crossed, feet apart. Stiff, rigid, rude.
Hands Relaxed motions Clenched. Abrupt gestures, fingerpointing, fist pounding.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 84
I-statements: Three components
1. A specific and nonblaming description of the behavior exhibited by the other person
2. The concrete effects of that behavior
3. The speaker’s feelings about the behavior
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 85
I-statement examplesBehavior Effects Feelings
When you come late to our meetings
We have to use valuable time bringing you up-to-date, and others end up doing your share of the work
And I resent that
When you interrupt me I lose my train of thought and don’t get to make my point
And that makes me angry
When you don’t complete your team assignments
It disrupts the team’s ability to complete it’s mission
And that concerns me
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 86
Assertive communication
• In addition to using I-statements:– Empathize with the other person’s
position in the situation– Specify what changes you would like
to see in the situation or in another’s behavior, and offer to negotiate those changes with the other person
– Indicate, in a nonthreatening way, the possible consequences that will follow if change does not occur.
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 87
Assertive Communication:
An example• “When you are late to meetings, I get
angry because I think it is wasting the time of all the other team members and we are never able to get through our agenda items. I would like you to consider finding some way of planning your schedule that lets you get to these meetings on time. That way, we can be more productive at the meetings and we can all keep to our tight schedules.”
Bret L. Simmons, Ph.D. 88
Open Discussion• What does your group see as the
biggest “gaps” between where you are and where you need to be?
• How can you help each other “hold creative tension” as you work to close these gaps?
• Any questions of me?