varong pongsai faculty of accountancy, rangsit university, thailand
TRANSCRIPT
Matrix Method Posting
Varong PongsaiFaculty of Accountancy, Rangsit
University, Thailand
Is it possible to adapt any other Mathematics technique to accounting procedure?
Which one is the most suitable for apply to accounting procedure?
If it is possible, how does that work?
Introduction: Motivation
To provide a new perspective of thinking and doing Accounting.
To prove the possibility of applying Mathematics application.
Introduction: Objectives of the study
Accounting Matrix can be used in an accounting procedure.
Accounting is easy access with other perspectives (Formal science perspective).
Introduction : Benefits of this study
Deductive Approach
I. Logical Comparison
II. Logical Investigation
III. Theory Comparison
IV. Empirical Application Testing
Research Methodology
There are 4 concepts for generating or discovering laws and theories
Dreams
Eureka
Deductive Approach
Inductive Approach
Context of discovery
Discovery: Matrix Application for Accounting procedure
Logic: Cause and Result Cause Mathematics is in an accounting procedure.
Result
Matrix can be placed in accounting procedure.
The Major Discovery and Logic
I. Logical Comparison
Accounting Logic Matrix Logic
2 sides operation in one time
Debit - Credit Operation
Balancing amount between 2 sides of operations
2 sides operation in one time
Roll - Column Operation
Balancing amount between 2 sides of operations
Accounting LogicDr. Equipment 100 and Dr. Utility expense
20Cr. Account Payable 100 Cr. Cash 20
Matrix Logic (Roll = Debit and Column = Credit)
I. Logical Comparison
Assets Liabilities Equity Revenue Expense Total
Assets 100 100
Liabilities
Equity
Revenue
Expense 20 20
Total 20 100 120
Asset’s debit = 100
Expense’s debit = 20
Liabilities’ credit = 100Asset’s credit = 20
Rough Trial Balance = 120
Assets Liabilities Equity Revenue Expense Total
Assets
Liabilities
Equity
Revenue
Expense
Total
Matrix Explanation
Debit Operation
Credit OperationPutting the number in 1 cell,
It will effect 2 sides.
Assets + Expense = Liabilities + Equity + Revenue (Debit side) (Credit Side)
II. Logical InvestigationAccounting Logic Matrix Logic
Dynamic movementAsset + Expense = Liability + Owner’s equity +
Revenue
(Debit) (Credit)
Expense - Liability = Owner’s equity + Revenue - Asset
(Debit) (Credit)
Dynamic Logic
DeterminantCross Product Method >> Small dimension matrix
Minor Method >> Large dimension matrix
Roll Minor = Column Minor
TransposeSwitch Roll and Column Operation
Inverse Calculation
Operating Business
)(
)(1
ADet
AAdjA
Components changing
Basic assumption for business activity
Liabilities increasing Purchasing assets on creditEquity increasing Initial investment by assetsRevenues increasing Selling merchandise for cashExpenses decreasing Adjusting prepaid expense by full expense
method
III.Theory ComparisonFormal Science Paradigm Social Science Paradigm
Exist in the nature
Use to identify natural logic
Mathematics is an essential tool.
Every natural appearance can be explained by mathematics’ function
Generated by human needs
Use to search for relationship
Statistics is a key for measurement.
Every relationship is provided and proved by statistics’ model.
Which one is closely to accounting?
Accounting has something strange for classifying.
Accounting uses basic mathematics’ operation.
Accounting depends on equation.
Accounting does not use to identify any appearance.
Accounting does not use statistics’ model.
Accounting does not exist in the nature.
III.Theory Comparison
Accounting is an example of hybrid paradigm
Mathematics’ operation – Formal science
Depends on equation – Formal science
Do not identify appearance – Social science
Do not exist in the nature – Social science
III.Theory Comparison
Light Appearance Study
- Light sometimes is a particle.
- Light sometimes is a wave.
Physics (Formal Science) calls Light as
“Dual Nature of Appearance”
III.Theory Comparison
Brought to Accounting by formal science
Accounting sometimes is Formal science.
Accounting sometimes is Social science.
Accounting should be called as
“Dual Nature of Appearance.”
III.Theory Comparison
For example;
“Purchase equipment 100 Baht on account”
What should accounting do with this transaction?
IV. Empirical Application Testing
1.Selecting Set of Element
2.Determining accounting logic
IV. Empirical Application Testing
Business Meaning Set of Element
Obtaining equipment Asset
Generating debt Liability
Business Meaning Logical thinking Side of Equation
Obtaining equipment
Asset is increasing Debit
Generating debt Liability is occurring Credit
3. Matrix and Real number Operation – Operating
(Assuming: Roll – Debit , and Column – Credit)
IV. Empirical Application Testing
Asset Liability Equity Revenue Expense Total
Asset 100 100
Liability
Equity
Revenue
Expense
Total 100 100
Total Debit = 100
Total Credit = 100
Total Debit = Total Credit
For example;
“Receive Utility Bill 20 Baht, paid cash only 15 Baht”
A classic way is as follow:
What’s about the new one?
IV. Empirical Application Testing
Transaction Reff. No.
Debit Credit
Utility expense 20
Cash Utility payable
155
1. Selecting Set of Element
2. Determining accounting logic
IV. Empirical Application Testing
Business Meaning Set of Element
Consuming utility from provider Expense
Paying cash to utility provider Asset
Delaying payment to provider Liability
Business Meaning Logical Thinking Side of equation
Consuming utility from provider
Expense is occurring Debit
Paying cash to utility provider Asset is decreasing Credit
Delaying payment to provider Liability is occurring Credit
3. Matrix and Real Number Operation – Operating
IV. Empirical Application Testing
Asset Liability Equity Revenue Expense Total
Asset 100 100
Liability
Equity
Revenue
Expense 15 5 20
Total 15 105 120
Asset Cr. = 15
Liability Cr. = 105
Asset Dr. = 100
Expense Dr. = 20
Total Dr. = Total Cr.
Logic : Cause; The fundamental operation can work.Result; The signature operation should work.
Signature Operation : Determinant Calculation
“Because, Accounting Matrix is a singular matrix.
Determinant must be equal 0” (det(A) = 0)
Additional Empirical Testing
Problem :
Is it truly that the determinant must be equaled to “0”?
Answer: It must be “0” because there are impossible transactions lying in the accounting dynamics.
For example;
These make the Matrix containing a lot of “0” in the cells.
Additional Empirical Testing
Impossible of revenue Impossible of expense
Dr. Equity XXX Cr. Revenue XXX
Dr. Expense XXX Cr. Equity XXX
How does determinant use in accounting?
Determinant calculation is useful to check how accuracy of accounting procedure is.
Who is the most appropriate user?
Auditor should be the most appropriate user, because this job concerns about the accuracy of accounting procedure.
Additional Empirical Testing
Accounting Matrix is proved for existing by the Deductive Approach.
Accounting Matrix can place for a classic way of recording possibly.
Formal science can be integrated into Social science procedure smoothly.
Formal science will cross over to Social science when the procedure is obviously providing
“Dual nature of appearance”.
Summary and Conclusion
The Accounting Matrix should also explain the surplus from combining between business
entities.(A and B are used for an entity matrix)
Merger: A + B = cA “c” stands for scalar of surplus proportion after merger procedure.
Consolidation: A + B = C“C” is a new matrix entity after consolidation.
Future research
Thank you