sunum 1-systems thinking
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
1/56
IntroductiontoSystems Thinking
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
2/56
The significant problems we face today
cannot be solved at the same level of
thinking at which they were created.
Albert Einstein
1 - 1
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
3/56
1 - 2
A system is a group of interacting, interrelated, and interdependentcomponents that form a complex and unified
whole. R. Ross
A system is a perceived whole whose elements hang together becausethey continually affect each other over time and operatetoward a common purpose. A. Kleiner
A system is an entity that maintains its existence and functions as awhole through the interaction of it parts. J. OConnor and I.
McDermott
Systems thinking is a discipline for seeing wholes, recognizing patternsand interrelationships, and learning how to structure thoseinterrelationships in more effective and efficient ways. P.Senge and C. Lannon-Kim
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
4/56
Founded in 1956 by MIT professor, Jay Forrester.System thinking allows people to make their understandingof social system explicit and improve them in the sameway that people use engineering principles to improve theirunderstanding of mechanical system.
It is use to:-
Examining how we create our own problems Seeing the big picture Structure influences performance
WHAT IS SYSTEMS THINKING?
1 - 3
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
5/56
1 - 4
A system is something that maintains its existence and functions as a whole through the interaction of its parts. (a system of
people is an organization). Systems have input processes, outputs
and outcomes, with ongoing feedback among these various parts. If one part of the system is removed, the nature of thesystem is changed.
Systems range from very simple to very complex . There arenumerous types of systems. The human body is a good exampleof a system. There are biological systems (the heart, etc.),mechanical systems (thermostat, etc.), human/mechanicalsystems (riding a bicycle, etc.), ecological systems (predator/prey,etc.), and social systems (groups, supply and demand,organization etc.).
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
6/56
1 - 5
Complex systems , such as social systems, are comprised ofnumerous subsystem s, as well. These subsystems are integratedto accomplish the overall goal of the larger system. Eachsubsystem has its own boundaries of sorts, and includes variousinputs, processes, outputs and outcomes geared to accomplish anoverall goal for the subsystem.
Is A pile of sand a system ?
It is not a system. If one removes a sand particle, you still have a pile of sand. However, a functioning car is a system. Remove thecarburetor and you no longer have a working car.
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
7/56
SYSTEM THINKING APPROACH
Traditional analysis Systems thinking
Traditional analysis focuses onthe separating the individualpieces of what is being studied; infact, the word analysis actually comes from the root meaning to
break into constituent parts.
Systems thinking, in contrast,focuses on how the thing beingstudied interacts with the otherconstituents of the system a setof elements that interact toproduce behavior of which it is a
part.
1 - 6
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
8/56
Complex problems that involve helping manyactors see the big picture and not just theirpart of itRecurring problems or those that have beenmade worse by past attempts to fix themIssues where an action affects (or is affectedby) the environment surrounding the issue,either the natural environment or thecompetitive environmentProblems whose solutions are not obvious
Examples of area System Thinking has
proven its value include:
1 - 7
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
9/56
Encourages us to see the whole as well as the parts.
Systems Thinking Learning to see the world systemically
?? ??
!!!
WHOLE PARTS Holistic Thinking
Multiple (often)restricted views
1 - 8
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
10/56 1 - 9
Systems thinking focus es on how the thing being studied interactswith the other constituents of the system. This means that insteadof isolating smaller and smaller parts of the system being studied,systems thinking works by expanding its view to take into accountlarger and larger numbers of interactions as an issue is beingstudied.
The nature of systems thinking makes the approach very effectivefor the most difficult types of problems to solve: those involvingcomplex issues, those that depend a great deal on the past or on theactions of others, and those stemming from ineffectivecoordination among those involved.
Systems Thinking Learning to see the world systemically
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
11/56
Systems Thinking
Webecoist.comMax Barret
Helps us explore interdependencies and looking for patterns.
1 - 10
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
12/56
Systems Thinking
River Fractal - Hctor Garrido
Helps us understand feedback structures that
change systems over time.
1 - 11
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
13/56
Systems Thinking
http://www.systems-thinking.org/theWay/theWay.htm
Helps us understand results of our decisions
1 - 12
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
14/56 1 - 13
System A system is an interrelated set of business proceduresused within one business unit working together for a
purposeA system has ( six to) nine characteristicsA system exists within an environmentA boundary separates a system from its environment
System ComponentsInterrelated ComponentsBoundaryPurposeEnvironmentInterfacesInputOutputConstraints
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
15/56 1 - 14
Characteristics of a System
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
16/56 1 - 15
Systems ThinkingImportant System Concepts
Decomposition-- The process of breaking down a system into smaller
components-- Allows the systems analyst to:
Break a system into small, manageable subsystemsFocus on one area at a timeConcentrate on component pertinent to one group of users
Build different components at independent times
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
17/56 1 - 16
Systems ThinkingImportant System Concepts
ModularityProcess of dividing a system into modules of a relatively uniform sizeModules simplify system design
CouplingSubsystems that are dependent upon each other are coupled
CohesionExtent to which a subsystem performs a single function
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
18/56 1 - 17
Systems ThinkingImportant System Concepts
Logical vs. Physical ModelingLogical System Description
-- Portrays the purpose and function of the system-- Does not tie the description to a specific physicalimplementation
Physical System Description
Focuses on how the system will be materially constructed
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
19/56 1 - 18
Today's problems come from yesterday's"solutions" !
A (Partial) List of the Laws of Systems Thinking
For example a new Manager is told to control high inventory costs. He solves the problem except that the sales team is now spending 20%more time responding to angry complaints from customers who arewaiting for late shipments, and the rest of the time trying to convince
prospective customers that they can have any color they want so long asits black. As a result sales are down.
Solutions that merely shift the problems from one part of the system toanother often go undetected because those who solved the first problem are different folks than those who inherit the problem.
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
20/56 1 - 19
A (Partial) List of the Laws of Systems Thinking
The harder you push, the harder thesystem pushes back!
Another systems term for this is compensating feedback. Most of us have experienced compensating feedback - the
harder we work to improve something, the more effort seems tobe required.
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
21/56 1 - 20
A (Partial) List of the Laws of Systems Thinking
The easy way out usually leads back in ! We typically prefer to intervene in a system at the level of rules suchas information flow, organization structure, reward and control
systems. These elements are more visible and are easier to work.
However, if we look at interrelationships within systems such as peoples deep -seated beliefs and attitudes, our leverage for effectivechange increases. We then come closer to seeing the underlyingreasons why rules organizational structure and work processes taketheir current form.
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
22/56 1 - 21
A (Partial) List of the Laws of Systems Thinking
The cure can be worse than the disease! Often the easy or familiar solution is very ineffective. Systems thinking refers to short -term improvements leading to long-term
dependency as shifting the burden.
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
23/56
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
24/56
Variables - an element in a situation which may act or be
acted upon Vary up or down over time (not an event) Nouns or noun phrases (not action words)
Links / Arrows - show the relationship and the direction
of influence between variables
S's and O's - show the way one variable moves or changesin relation to another S or + stands for " same direction O or - stands for " opposite direction
or B - Balancing feedback loop that seeks equilibrium or R - Reinforcing feedback loop that amplifies
change
Components of Causal Loop Diagrams
1 - 23
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
25/56
Employee
Performance
Supervisors SupportiveBehavior
Unsupportive
Behavior
Structure
S
S
Reinforcing Loop
Perf.Level
Time
Behavior Over Time
SupportiveBehavior
Employee
Performance
Supervisors SupportiveBehavior
Types of Causal Loop Diagrams
1 - 24
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
26/56
Discrepancy
Inventory
Adjustment
Structure
ActualInventory
DesiredInventory
Desired Inventory
Time
Behavior Over Time
100
100 - -
100 ++
Actual Inventory
S
S
S
O
Balancing Loop
Types of Causal Loop Diagrams
1 - 25
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
27/56
A class of tools that capture the "commonstories in systems thinking
Powerful tools for diagnosing problems andidentifying high leverage interventions thatcreates fundamental change
SYSTEMS THINKING ARCHETYPES
1 - 26
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
28/56
1. Fixes that Fail / Backfire
2. Limits to Growth/Success
3. Shifting the Burden / Addiction
4. Tragedy of the Commons
5. Drifting Goals
List of System Thinking Archetype
1 - 27
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
29/56
UnintendedConsequences
FixProblemSymptom
Delay
SS
S
O
Time
Behavior Over Time
1. Quick Fixes that Fail
1 - 28
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
30/56
1. Fixes that Fail
Example:An example would be fixing problem of a squeakywheel. Imagine someone who knows nothing aboutmechanics, mistakenly grab a can of water andsplash it on the wheel. With great relief thesqueaking stop for a while, it willreturn more loudly asthe water join forcesto rust the joint.
1 - 29
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
31/56
1. Fixes that Fail
Prescriptive actions: Increase awareness of the unintended
consequences Cut back on the frequency with which you apply
the fix Try to minimize the undesirable consequences Reframe and address the root problem, give up the
fix that works only on the symtom
Breaking fixes that fail merely alleviating asymptom, not really solving the problem. A twopronged attack of applying fix and findingfundamental solution will help to break theproblem.
1 - 30
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
32/56
PositiveReinforcement
Structure
Perf.Level
Time
Behavior Over Time
Corrective
Action
Target
DiminishingReturns
Burnout
Growing Action
Actual Performance
S
S
S
O
S
2. Limits to Growth
The Limits to Growth archetype states that a reinforcing process of accelerating growth (or expansion) willencounter a balancing process as the limit of the systems is approached. It hypothesizes that continuing efforts will
produce diminishing returns as one approaches the limits.
1 - 31
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
33/56
2. Limits to Growth
1 - 32
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
34/56
2. Limits to GrowthExample:At the beginning of a quality improvement campaign,significant gains in quality and productivity wereachieved. Once this achieved, the level of
improvements plateaus.The next wave of improvementsare more complex and tougher tomanage. Later the lack oforganization-wide support leads tolimited/diminishing quality andproductivity of the whole organization (it becomes
stagnant or diminish).1 - 33
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
35/56
2. Limits to Growth
Prescriptive actions: Beware of doing more of what worked in the past. If your growth has stalled, look at both reinforcing
and balancing loops to try to find interrelationships
between your success strategies and potentiallimits.
Look for other potential engines of growth. Th e real leverage in limits to growth scenario lies in
its early phases. The choice between plateauing or peaking often
depends on length of balancing loop delay and ourresponse to it.
1 - 34
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
36/56
3. Shifting the Burden
Quick fixes
Problem/symptom
Source of problem/Root cause
Side effects
+
_
_
+
_
+
+
_ _
Efforts Quick fix
Time
Behavior Over Time
Capacity of systemto fix itself
Problem symptom
1 - 35
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
37/56
3. Shifting the Burden
Apply Patches
Damage of Road
Proper RoadContruction
Feeling of Okay
+
_
_
+
_
+
+
_ _
Apply patches
Time
Behavior Over Time
Proper roadconstruction
Damage of road
1 - 36
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
38/56
3. Shifting the Burden
Example:Problem of pot holes on the road. The problem is
handled by applying patches with immediate effect,thereby solving the problem for a while. The primary
source of the problem is overlooked, that is theoverall quality of the road construction.
The origin of the problem
should be identified and
solved in the long-term runor else the quality of the
road will be further
diminished. 1 - 37
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
39/56
3. Shifting the Burden
Prescriptive actions: Strengthen the long-term solution. If possible, support only long-term solution. If
you must address the symtoms right away, do sowith restraint.
As you strengthen long-term capability, do whatyou can to reduce dependency on the short-termfix.
1 - 38
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
40/56
4. Tragedy of the Commons
Total ActivityGain perIndividualActivity
ResourceLimit
O
S
S
S Time
A
Time
B
As Activity
Bs Activity
Net Gainsfor B
S
S
S
S
Net Gainsfor AS
S
1 - 39
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
41/56
4. Tragedy of the Commons
Investmentin Integration
PerceivedSuccess fromIntegration
S
O
O
Time
A
Time
B
Investmentin features
S
S
S
S
O
O
Success fromProductInvestment
Success fromProductInvestment
Investmentin features
FixedBudget
FixedBudget
Investmentin Integration
DELAY
S
S
1 - 40
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
42/56
4. Tragedy of the Commons
Example:Traffic jam in Kuala Lumpur. Everyone wishes to avoidtraffic jam will use the highway. At first there is roomfor everyone, but after sometimes critical threshold hasbeen reached, each driver brings aboutdecrease in average speed.
As individuals each person feels he orshe is a victim of traffic but in effectthey all conspired as a group to createtraffic jam.
1 - 41
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
43/56
4. Tragedy of the Commons
Prescriptive actions:
In any of the tragedy situations, there must be anoverriding legislation for common good.
To protect common resources some formof regulation should be introduced.
Re-evaluate the nature of the commons to determineif there are ways to replace, renew or substitute theresources before it becomes depleted.
1 - 42
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
44/56
5. Drifting Goals
Goal Pressure toLower Goal
Gap
Corrective ActionActual
SS
O
SO
S
Delay
Time
Goal
1 - 43
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
45/56
Perceived DesiredTemperature
Tolerance forTemperature
TemperatureGap
Hop Out
Time
TempS
S
O
S
O
5. Drifting Goals
1 - 44
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
46/56
Example:If you put a frog in cold water and slowly bringthe water to boil the frog will jump out when itgets uncomfortable or even died in the boiling
waterIf you put a frog in boiling water,it will croak IMMEDIATELY.
5. Drifting Goals
1 - 45
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
47/56
5. Drifting Goals
Prescriptive actions:
Establish a clear transition plan from current realityto the goal including realistic timeframe to achievethe goal.
Determine whether the drift in performance is theresult of conflicts between the stated goal andimplicit goals in the system.
Anchor the goal to an external frame of reference(benchmarking).
1 - 46
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
48/56
Systems Thinking Case Study
Crop Damaging by Insects
1 - 47
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
49/56
When an insect is eating a crop, the conventionalresponse is to spray the crop with a pesticidedesigned to kill that insect.
Putting aside the limited effectiveness of somepesticides and the water and soil pollution they cancause, imagine a perfect pesticide that kills all of theinsects against which it is used and which has noside effects on air, water, or soil.
Is using this pesticide likely to make the farmer orcompany whose crops are being eaten better off?
Reducing Crop Damage by Insects:
1 - 48
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
50/56
Reducing Crop Damage by Insects:
InsectsDamaging Crops
Pesticide Application
O
If we represent the thinking used by thoseapplying the pesticides, it would look like this:
1. The letter indicates how the two variables are related: an s means theychange in the same direction - if one goes up then the other goes up, andan o means they change in the opposite direction - if one goes up thenthe other goes down (or vice versa).
2. This diagram is read a change in the amount of pesticide applied causesthe number of insects damaging crops to change in the oppositedirection.
3. The belief being represented here is that as the amount of pesticideapplied increases, the number of insects damaging crops decreases.
1 - 49
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
51/56
Total number ofInsects damaging crop
PesticideApplication
S
O
S
Number of Insect ADamaging Crop
Number of Insect B
Number of Insect BDamaging Crop
S
S
O
Reducing Crop Damage by Insects:
1 - 50
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
52/56
Reducing Crop Damage by Insects:
4. The problem of crop damage due to insects often does get better - in theshort term.
5. Unfortunately, what frequently happens is that in following years theproblem of crop damage gets worse and worse and the pesticide that
formerly seemed so effective does not seem to help anymore.6. This is because the insect A that was eating the crops was controlling thepopulation of another insect B, either by preying on it or by competing withit.
7. When the pesticide kills the insects A that were eating the crops, iteliminates the control that those insects were applying on the population of
the other insects, insects B).8. Then the population of the insects B that were being controlled explodes
and continue to damage the crops.
1 - 51
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
53/56
So now how do you solve the problemof Insect B damaging the crop?
Find the solution..
Reducing Crop Damage by Insects:
1 - 52
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
54/56
With this picture of the system in mind, otheractions with better long-term results have been
developed, such as Integrated Pest Management ,which includes controlling the insect eating the
crops by introducing more of its predators into thearea . These methods have been proven effective in
studies conducted by MIT, the National Academyof Sciences, and others, and they also avoidrunning the risk of soil and water pollution.
Reducing Crop Damage by Insects
The solution:
1 - 53
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
55/56
THE FIFTH DISCIPLINES
To more about Systems Thinking,read this book!
TeamLearning
PersonalMastery
Mental
Models
Shared
Vision
Systems
Thinking
1 - 54
-
8/10/2019 Sunum 1-Systems Thinking
56/56
References
Warfield, J. Societal Systems , Intersystems, 1989.Joseph OConnor & Ian McDermott. The Art of Systems Thinking ,Thorsons, 1997.Senge, P.M.
The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization,Doubleday, 1990.
The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building ALearning Organization, Doubleday, 1994.System Dynamics / Systems Thinking Mega Link Listhttp://www.uni-klu.ac.at/users/gossimit/links/bookmksd.htmThe Way of Systems (System Archetypes)
http://www.outsights.com/systems/theWay/theWay.htmDaniel Aronson, Overview of Systems Thinking, 1996-8http://www.thinking.net