report on limited phase ii environmental site …

July 2013 Our Ref: 13-186

Geotechnical Engineering Hydrogeology Environmental Site Assessment Geotechnical Materials Testing and Inspection

Houle Chevrier Engineering Ltd. 180 Wescar Lane

R.R. 2 Carp, Ontario K0A 1L0

Tel: (613) 836-1422 Fax: (613) 836-9731

www.hceng.ca

REPORT ON

LIMITED PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 90 GUIGUES AVENUE OTTAWA, ONTARIO

Submitted to:

Sarah Fulford 3-90 Guigues Avenue Ottawa, Ontario K1N 5H7 DISTRIBUTION: 2 Copies – Sarah Fulford 1 Digital Copy – Sarah Fulford 1 Copy - Houle Chevrier Engineering Ltd.

Report to: July 2013 Sarah Fulford - i - Our Ref: 13-186

Houle Chevrier Engineering Ltd.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Houle Chevrier Engineering Ltd. (HCEL) was retained by Sarah Fulford to conduct a Limited

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the property at 90 Guigues Avenue in

Ottawa, Ontario.

The objectives of the limited Phase II ESA were based on a previous Phase I ESA and

geotechnical report prepared by HCEL in 2010 and are as follows:

Assess the soil on the site for potential contamination from the fill material; and,

Assess the groundwater on the site for potential contamination.

The field investigation consisted of advancing two (2) test pits, and sampling from an existing

monitoring well. Groundwater samples were not obtained due to insufficient water in the

monitoring well. Soil samples were collected from the test pits and submitted to Paracel

Laboratories Ltd. of Ottawa, Ontario for laboratory analysis. The results of the Phase II ESA are

summarized below:

Data collected during the borehole drilling indicate that the site is generally underlain by a surficial layer of granular material, followed by fill material consisting of dark brown sandy silt with some gravel and cobbles, and ash, concrete pieces and ceramic pieces. Glacial till was encountered below the fill material in test pit 13-1. Test pit 13-1 was terminated on bedrock at a depth of approximately 1.6 m bgs.

The MOE site condition standards selected for this site are the MOE Table 7 Generic Site Condition Standards for Shallow Coarse Grained Soils in a Non-Potable Ground Water Condition and Residential Property Use as outlined in the MOE, Soil, Groundwater and Sediment Standards for use under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (MOE, April 15, 2011).

The analytical results of the soil samples submitted from the test pits exceed the MOE Table 7 site condition standards for one or more parameters tested. The soil sample submitted from TP13-1 exceeds the site condition standards for sodium absorption ratio, conductivity, barium and lead. The soil sample submitted from TP13-2 exceeds the site condition standards for mercury, lead, acenapthylene, benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, debenzo(a,h)anthracene, fluoranthene and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene.

Based on the results of the current investigation, some or all of the fill material on the site does

not meet MOE Table 7 requirements. As part of the development, the existing fill material

should be removed and disposed of at a licensed landfill. Delineation of soil exceeding the site

Report to: July 2013 Sarah Fulford - ii - Our Ref: 13-186


condition standards could be performed in order to determine the amount of material required to

be disposed of at a licensed landfill facility.

At the time of the investigation, groundwater conditions could not be assessed due to

insufficient groundwater. Based on the chemical testing during the previous geotechnical

investigation, there is potential for contaminants in the groundwater.

Report to: July 2013 Sarah Fulford - iii - Our Ref: 13-186


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary i Table of Contents iii Section Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Site Description and Background ................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives and Scope of Work ..................................................................................... 2

2.0 SITE INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY ....................................................................... 3 2.1 Borehole Drilling and Soil Sampling ............................................................................. 3 2.2 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling ........................................................................ 4

3.0 RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION ............................................................................. 5 3.1 Site Geology ................................................................................................................ 5 3.2 Site Restoration Standards .......................................................................................... 6 3.3 Soil Sample Results ..................................................................................................... 7 3.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control ............................................................................... 7

4.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................ 9

5.0 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY ............................................................................................11

6.0 REFERENCES ...............................................................................................................13 In order following Page 13: LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 Key Plan

FIGURE 2 Test Pit Location Plan

FIGURE 3 Grain Size Distribution

LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 Soil Analytical Results – Petroleum Parameters

TABLE 2 Soil Analytical Results – Metal Parameters

TABLE 3 Soil Analytical Results – Volatile Organic Compounds

TABLE 4 Soil Analytical Results – Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A Record of Borehole Sheets

APPENDIX B Laboratory Certificate of Analysis - Soil Samples

Report to: July 2013 Sarah Fulford - iv - Our Ref: 13-186


APPENDIX C Letter from Dr. Martha Fulford

Report to: July 2013 Sarah Fulford - 1 - Our Ref: 13-186


1.0 INTRODUCTION

Houle Chevrier Engineering Ltd. (HCEL) was retained by Sarah Fulford to conduct a Limited

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the property at 90 Guigues Avenue, Ottawa,

Ontario (hereafter referred as “the site”). This report documents the methodology and results of

the Phase II ESA conducted at the site.

1.1 Site Description and Background

The site is owned by Sarah Fulford and is located on the south side of Guigues Avenue,

approximately 50 metres east of the intersection of Parent Street and Guigues Avenue (refer to

Key Plan, Figure 1). The site has a total area of approximately 0.16 hectares and is partially

occupied by a multi-storey apartment building located along the western property boundary.

The remainder of the site is occupied by a parking area and grassed/landscaped area.

Surrounding land use is residential.

A Phase I ESA and a geotechnical investigation were previously conducted for the site by

HCEL. The results of the Phase I ESA were provided in our report titled: “Phase I

Environmental Site Assessment, 90 Guigues Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario” dated January 2010.

The results of the geotechnical investigation were provided in our report titled: “Geotechnical

Investigation, Proposed Residential Development, 90 Guigues Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario” dated

February 2010. A review of the reports identified the following environmental issues:

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) sampling completed in the geotechnical investigation

The concentration of benzene in the groundwater sample taken on January 11, 2010 exceeds the current applicable MOE Table 7 site condition standard (0.7 µg/L versus standard of 0.5 µg/L).

The concentration of chloroform in the groundwater sample exceeds the current applicable MOE Table 7 site condition standard (13.4 µg/L versus standard of 2 µg/L).

Fill material identified in the geotechnical investigation

The amended Ontario Regulation 153/04 identifies fill material as a potentially contaminating activity that requires investigation if located on the subject property. The geotechnical investigation by HCEL in August 2012 indicates that fill materials exists on the site.



1.2 Objectives and Scope of Work

The objectives of the Phase II ESA are listed below:



To address these objectives, HCEL proposed a work program that includes:

Advancing two (2) test pits at two (2) locations using a rubber tire backhoe;

Collecting soil samples recovered from the test pits;

Collecting groundwater samples from the monitoring well; and,

Submitting soil and groundwater samples to Paracel Laboratories Ltd., an acreditted analytical laboratory in Ottawa, Ontario, for laboratory analyses of selected chemical parameters.

Prior to the field investigation, the public and private underground utilities were located and the

test pit locations were cleared by Safe to Dig, a private services locating contractor based in

Ottawa, Ontario. The locations of the test pits are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2.



2.0 SITE INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY

2.1 Test Pits and Soil Sampling

Two (2) test pits (13-1 and 13-2) were advanced on June 19, 2013, at the locations shown on

Figure 2. The test pits were advanced using a rubber tire backhoe supplies by Ken White

Construction 2000 Ltd. of Ottawa, Ontario. The test pits were advanced to a maximum depth of

1.6 metres below ground surface (m bgs).

Soil samples were recovered from the fill material on the sidewalls of the test pits. The soil

samples were collected following the Guidance on Sampling and Analytical Methods for Use at

Contaminated Sites in Ontario (the MOE, 1996). Clean gloves were worn and changed

between each sample. The soil samples were inspected in the field for visual and tactile

evidence of impact. Headspace combustible gas concentrations were measured in the field

using a portable combustible gas detector manufactured by RKI Instruments (Eagle series)

calibrated to a known hexane gas standard and operated in methane elimination mode. The

headspace combustible gas concentration readings for the soil samples are provided on the

Record of Test Pit sheets in Appendix A.

One (1) soil sample from each test pit and a duplicate soil sample from test pit 13-1 were

submitted to Paracel Laboratories Ltd. for chemical analyses of selected parameters. Soil

samples were selected based on the presence of fill material, combustible headspace gas

readings and visual and tactile evidence of impact. The soil samples submitted and the

selected parameters analysed are summarized in the following table:

Borehole Sample Depth Interval (metres below

ground surface) Parameters Analysed

TP13-1 SA2 1.0

-PHCs F1 to F41

-BTEX2

-VOCs3

-PAHs4

-Metals and Inorganics

TP13-2 SA1 0.5

-PHCs F1 to F4 -BTEX -VOCs -PAHs

-Metals and Inorganics

TP13-35 SA1 1.0 -PHCs F1 to F4 -BTEX -VOCs



Borehole Sample Depth Interval (metres below

ground surface) Parameters Analysed

-PAHs

-Metals and Inorganics Notes:

1. PHCs F1 to F4 - Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fractions in the F1 to F4 ranges. 2. BTEX – Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylenes. 3. VOCs – Volatile Organic Compounds. 4. PAHs – Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. 5. TP13-3 is a duplicate of TP13-1.

Additional details on the soil samples recovered can be found in the Record of Test Pit sheets

provided in Appendix A.

2.2 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling

The static groundwater level was measured in the monitoring well installed in borehole BH1

during the geotechnical investigation by HCEL in 2010. The static ground water level was

measured at 3.8 m bgs on June 19, 2013 using a Heron Instruments oil/water interface meter.

No groundwater sample was obtained on June 19, 2013 due to insufficient water present in the

monitoring well as the well immediately went dry when purging and no recovery was observed

within two (2) hours of monitoring the groundwater level.



3.0 RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION

3.1 Site Geology

The subsurface conditions identified in test pits TP13-1 and TP13-2 are given on the Record of

Test Pit sheets in Appendix A following the text of this report. The Record of Test Pit sheets

indicate the subsurface conditions at the specific test locations only. Boundaries between

zones on the logs are often not distinct, but rather are transitional and have been interpreted.

The precision with which subsurface conditions are indicated depends on the method of

excavation, the frequency and recovery of samples, the method of sampling, and the uniformity

of the subsurface conditions. Subsurface conditions at other than the test locations may vary

from the conditions encountered in the test pits. In addition to soil variability, fill material of

variable physical and chemical composition can be present over portions of the site or on

adjacent properties.

The soil descriptions in this report are based on commonly accepted methods of classification

and identification employed in geotechnical practice. Classification and identification of soil

involves judgement and HCEL does not guarantee descriptions as exact, but infers accuracy to

the extent that is common in current practice.

The following presents a simplified overview of the subsurface conditions encountered in the

test pits advanced during this investigation. It should be noted that bones were found during the

advancement of test pit 13-2. Photographs were sent to Dr. Martha Fulford by the owner Sarah

Fulford. A letter by Dr. Martha Fulford indicating that the bones in the photographs were

determined to be animal bones is provided in Appendix C.

Asphaltic Concrete / Granular Material Test pits 13-1 and 13-2 encountered granular material from ground surface with a thickness of

approximately 0.1 metres. Test pit 13-2 encountered a 0.1 metre thick asphaltic concrete layer

below the granular material.

Fill Material Fill material was encountered below the granular / asphaltic concrete layer in test pits 13-1 and

13-2. The thickness of the fill material in test pit 13-1 is approximately 0.9 metres. The extent of

the fill material in test pit 13-2 was not determined due to the presence of bones in the test pit



which halted the advancement. The fill material is composed of dark brown silty sand with some

gravel and cobbles. The fill material also contained ash, concrete pieces and ceramic pieces.

Glacial Till A deposit of glacial till was encountered in test pit 13-1 beneath the fill material. The glacial till is

composed of grey brown silty sand and gravel with trace clay. Cobbles and boulders should also

be expected in the glacial till, but were not observed in the test pit.

Bedrock Test pit 13-1 was terminated on bedrock at a depth of 1.6 m bgs.

Detailed descriptions of the soil conditions can be found on the Record of Test Pit sheets in

Appendix A

3.2 Site Restoration Standards

Site restoration standards were selected for this site in accordance with the requirements of

Ontario Regulation 153/04, Records of Site Condition – Part XV.1 of The Environmental

Protection Act (O. Reg. 153/04, MOE, October 31, 2011).

The following information was considered in selecting the site condition standards:

The site and neighbouring properties are serviced by the City of Ottawa’s municipal drinking water system;

The site is considered residential property since the site is currently occupied by a multi- residential building and the surrounding land use is also residential;

The overburden thickness encountered during borehole drilling was less than 2 metres.

The pH of the soil samples, as shown in Table 1, is between 5 and 9, and therefore the site is not considered an environmentally sensitive area as defined by O. Reg. 153/04 s. 41(1).

A grain size analysis performed an a sample of the glacial till was determined to have greater than 50 percent of particles larger than 75 µm in diameter and therefore is considered a coarse textured site. The results of the grain size analysis are provided on Figure 3.



Based on the above information, the current MOE Table 7 Generic Site Condition Standards for

Shallow Coarse Grained Soils in a Non-Potable Ground Water Condition and Residential

Property Use as outlined in the MOE, Soil, Groundwater and Sediment Standards for use under

Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (MOE, April 15, 2011) was selected for this site.

3.3 Soil Sample Results

Analytical results for the soil samples submitted for analysis from test pits 13-1, 13-2, and the

selected MOE site condition standards are presented on Tables 2 to 5. The laboratory

Certificates of Analysis for soil samples are provided in Appendix B.

The analytical results of the laboratory testing exceed the site condition standards of one or

more parameters for both soil samples. The exceedances are summarized in the following

tables:

TP13-1 SA2

Parameter Laboratory Result (µg/g) Site Condition Standard (µg/g)

Barium 979 390

Lead 184 120

Sodium Absorption Ratio 7.71 (unitless) 5 (unitless)

Conductivity 1990 (µS/cm) 700 (µS/cm)

TP 13-2 SA1

Parameter Laboratory Result (µg/g) Site Condition Standard (µg/g)

Mercury 1.4 0.27

Lead 317 120

Acenaphthylene 0.18 0.15

Benzo(a)anthracene 0.89 0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene 1.09 0.3

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1.54 0.78

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 0.18 0.1

Fluoranthene 1.37 0.69

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.83 0.38

3.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control

A quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) program was implemented to minimize and

quantify impacts introduced during sample collection, handling, shipping and analysis. As part

of the QA/QC program, sampling protocols included: submitting duplicate samples, minimizing

sample handling, using dedicated non-contaminated sampling equipment, using sample specific

identification and labelling procedures and using chain of custody records.



Laboratory QA/QC results are included with the laboratory Certificates of Analysis provided in

Appendix B. Sample holding times were met. All laboratory quality control blanks, duplicates

and spikes met applicable industry criteria with the exception of the quality control duplicate for

fluoranthene, which was high; however, the sample result is less than ten times the method

detection limit. The reporting limit for free cyanide for the sample TP13-2 SA1 and the duplicate

sample were elevated due to matrix interference.

There are large differences between the original sample TP13-1 SA2 and the duplicate for a

number of parameters including lead and barium which exceed the MOE site condition

standards in sample TP13-1 SA2 but do not in the duplicate sample. The large differences in

the sample results could be due to the heterogeneous nature of the fill material that was

encountered on site.

Based on the measures discussed above, sample collection and handling protocols are

considered acceptable.



4.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Houle Chevrier Engineering Ltd. (HCEL) was retained by Sarah Fulford to conduct a Limited

Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the property at 90 Guigues Avenue, Ottawa,

Ontario.

The objectives of the limited Phase II ESA were based on a previous Phase I ESA and

geotechnical report prepared by HCEL in 2010 and are as follows:



The field investigation consisted of advancing two (2) test pits, and sampling from an existing

monitoring well. Groundwater samples were not obtained due to insufficient water in the

monitoring well. Soil samples were collected from the test pits and submitted to Paracel

Laboratories Ltd. of Ottawa, Ontario for laboratory analysis. The results of the Phase II ESA are

summarized below.

The data collected during the borehole drilling indicate that the site is generally underlain by a

surficial layer of granular material, followed by fill material consisting of dark brown sandy silt

with some gravel and cobbles, and ash, concrete pieces and ceramic pieces. Glacial till was

encountered below the fill material in test pit 13-1. Test pit 13-1 was terminated on bedrock at a

depth of approximately 1.6 m bgs.

The MOE site condition standards selected for this site are the MOE Table 7 Generic Site

Condition Standards for Shallow Coarse Grained Soils in a Non-Potable Ground Water

Condition and Residential Property Use as outlined in the MOE, Soil, Groundwater and

Sediment Standards for use under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (MOE, April

15, 2011).

The analytical results of the soil samples submitted from the soil samples submitted from the

test pits exceed the MOE Table 7 site condition standards for one or more parameters tested.

The soil sample submitted from TP13-1 exceeds the site condition standards for sodium

absorption ratio, conductivity, barium and lead. The soil sample submitted from TP13-2

exceeds the site condition standards for mercury, lead, acenaphthylene, benzo(a)anthracene,



benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, fluoranthene and indeno(1,2,3-

cd)pyrene.

Based on the results of the current investigation, some or all of the fill material on the site does

not meet MOE Table 7 requirements. As part of the development, the existing fill material

should be removed and disposed of at a licensed landfill. Delineation of soil exceeding the site

condition standards could be performed in order to determine the amount of material required to

be disposed of at a licensed landfill facility.

At the time of the investigation, groundwater conditions could not be assessed due to

insufficient groundwater. Based on the chemical testing during the previous geotechnical

investigation, there is potential for contaminants in the groundwater.



5.0 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY

This report was prepared for and the work referred to within it has been undertaken by Houle

Chevrier Engineering Ltd. (HCEL) for Sarah Fulford. It is intended for the exclusive use of

Sarah Fulford. This report may not be relied upon by any other person or entity without the

express written consent of HCEL and Sarah Fulford. Nothing in this report is intended to

provide a legal opinion.

The investigation undertaken by HCEL with respect to this report and any conclusions or

recommendations made in this report reflect the best judgments of HCEL based on the site

conditions observed during the investigations undertaken at the date(s) identified in the report

and on the information available at the time the report was prepared. This report has been

prepared for the application noted and it is based, in part, on visual observations made at the

site, subsurface investigations at discrete locations and depths and laboratory analyses of

specific chemical parameters and material during a specific time interval, all as described in the

report. Unless otherwise stated, the findings contained in this report cannot be extrapolated or

extended to previous or future site conditions, portions of the site that were unavailable for direct

investigation, subsurface locations on the site that were not investigated directly, or chemical

parameters, materials or analysis which were not addressed. Chemical parameters other than

those addressed by the investigation described in this report may exist in soil and groundwater

elsewhere on the site, the chemical parameters addressed in the report may exist in soil and

groundwater at other locations at the site that were not investigated and concentrations of the

chemical parameters addressed which are different than those reported may exist at other

locations on the site than those from where the samples were taken.

Should new information become available during future work, including excavations, borings or

other studies, HCEL should be requested to review the information and, if necessary, re-assess

the conclusions presented herein.



6.0 REFERENCES

Houle Chevrier Engineering Ltd., 2010. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 90 Guigues Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario (January, 2010) Houle Chevrier Engineering Ltd., 2010. Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Residential Development, 90 Guigues Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario (February, 2010) Ontario Ministry of Environment, 1996. Guidance on Sampling and Analytical Methods for Use at Contaminated Sites in Ontario (December 1996) Ontario Ministry of Environment, 2011. Environmental Protection Act, Ontario Regulation 153/04, Records of Site Condition, Part XV.1 of the Act (October 31, 2011) Ontario Ministry of Environment, 2011. Soil Groundwater and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. (April 15, 2011)

z

FIGURE 1 KEY PLAN

Date: July 2013

Project: 13-186

N.T.S

181

200

17 9 341

34347

11 4

18 7

209

22 1

23 1

228

230

232

234

226

240

236

238

215

21 922 1

22 5

15 6

229

231

16 2222

227

224

233

235

20 4

23 9

15 8

244

246

248

250

15 9

16 1

16 3

17 4

17 6

205

20319

920

1

218

202

213

215

170

21 7

24 0

227

20 7

217

217

222

227

231

233

24 7

22 2

23 4

20 7

184

21 3

23 9

21 1

21 922 5

22 2

23 5

22 6

230

232

236

20 8

204

206

208 21

021

6

176

189

129

14 1

236

238

20 7

20 3

183

211

213

24 024 6

14 5

20 720 9

16 9

191

19 3

19 3

201

18 4

21 6

18 7

22 6

20 3 173

21 1

19 319 5

19 920 9 17 1

220

222

224

155

185

12 1

12 3

11 9

17 0

16 8

17 818 2

166

17 4

160

162

156

158

163

13 7

13 9

13 1

13 3

13 5 16 917 3

17 717 9

12 3

12 5

12 7

12 9

11 0

18 118 3

183

18 5

17 617 8

182

184

18 8

172

197

192

210

18 0

19 1

17 5

150

148

178

171

17 9

183

175

131

137 13 9

173

171

157

155

17 2160

15 8

166

16 8

15313 2

14 4

15 4

151

13 9

13 7

14 3

149

13 6

13 6

140 14

0

17417

217

2

14 3

16 0

159

16 416 8

16 7

161

16 3

17 4

14 5

14 7

14 9

16 116 3

157

15 1

15 517 017 017 0

15 3

168

17 017 017 017 0

17 2

17 0

163

127

14 3

163

9910 1

10 5

99

14 5

11 1

15 0

14 8

152

158

168

142

14 4

17 6

20

1

60

10 0

201

7371

48

25

5

42

32

52

5660

90

6567

99

59

55

40

44

53

81

6670

72

75

78

77

424

11 0

282

11 8

81

14 5

29 7

287

14 4

154 13 515

0

53

111

329

331

31 0

16 2

328

330

291

289

293

28 4

28 0

15 9

15 7

17 9

28 829 2

29 6

300

302

30 8

31 0

17 9

192

18 4

184

30 7

333

207

277

30 5

281

287

33 2

257

14 5

291

194

302

165 16

5

16 9

17 4

29 530 3

18 2

18 0

17 2

16 8

335

156

15 8

339

17 4

164

327

12 0

205

20 7

10 5

7379

81

114

116

114

13 7

15 315 7

13 5

267

269

16 4

16 4

16 7

16 6

173

175

16 9

26 1

27 3

27 928 5

15 8

15 2

27727

5

23 023 0

12 0

12 2

150

22 3

245

215

245

140

142

193

13 8

151

14 8

15 6

16 1

144

14 6

13 8

142

14 4

25 9

145

147

152

150

14 8

14814

6

10 711 3

218

200

210

21 4

80

80

10310

3

100

102

78

64

90

10 688

86

98

86

9092

88

48

48

50

80

76

59

46

56

11211

0

57

45

49

53

59

51

89 91

8583

87

9597

115

117

190

99

92

91

95

10 0

11 0

102

113

103

105

93

6361

58

7579

81

8385

8789

272

276

26 0

14 3

255

256

261

13 5

271

279

220

222

22 4

10 9

23 2

9397

89

21 2

234

236

24 0

11 9

113

234

23 5

25 1

23 1

22 7

18 6

20 0 204

206

210

208

207

11 3

209

225

21 5

21 5

21 521 5

10 4

10 811 0

11 7

85

110

203

19 9

95

88

90

82

385

6658

44

373

61

70

7954

4652

59

321 11

0

95

61

57

32 1

343

353

11 6

34 3350

9387

321

13 8

111

113 11

9

12 1

12 3

127

105

109

107

12 9

13 7

321

321

374

313

30 7

299

103

311

101

5555

155

366

71

75

61

62

87

87

54

51

45

47

49

11 0

10 4

75

102

92

35

41

54

43

4137

505

29 0

55

42 4

44 0

81

10 8

10 5

21

10 1

31

27

34

25

3443

39

41

34

92

43

1010

38

24

24

16 6

15 015 6

15 816 0

17 017 4

24

500

89

73

9

95

67

10 0

87

13

30

33

24

13 8

14 6

55

78

489

35

39

51

77

115

81

15

15

43

40

38

32

30

26

17

27

33

330

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

KIN

G E

DW

AR

D A

VE

KIN

G E

DW

AR

D A

VE

KIN

G E

DW

AR

D A

VE

KIN

G E

DW

AR

D A

VE

KIN

G E

DW

AR

D A

VE

KIN

G E

DW

AR

D A

VE

KIN

G E

DW

AR

D A

VE

KIN

G E

DW

AR

D A

VE

KIN

G E

DW

AR

D A

VE

KIN

G E

DW

AR

D A

VE

BOTELER ST

BOTELER ST

BOTELER ST

BOTELER ST

BOTELER ST

ST. PATR

ICK S

T

ST. PATR

ICK S

T

ST. PATR

ICK S

T

ST. PATR

ICK S

T

ST. PATR

ICK S

T

SU

SSEX D

R

SU

SSEX D

R

SU

SSEX D

R

SU

SSEX D

R

SU

SSEX D

R

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

SU

SS

EX

DR

MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST M

URRAY ST

MURRAY S

T

MURRAY S

T

MURRAY S

T

MURRAY S

T

ST. PATRIC

K ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

MA

CK

EN

ZIE

AV

E

MA

CK

EN

ZIE

AV

E

MA

CK

EN

ZIE

AV

E

MA

CK

EN

ZIE

AV

E

MA

CK

EN

ZIE

AV

E

BOTELER ST

BOTELER ST

BOTELER ST

BOTELER ST

BOTELER ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

ST. PATRIC

K ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

BY WARD MARKET SQ

BY WARD MARKET SQ

BY WARD MARKET SQ

BY WARD MARKET SQ

BY WARD MARKET SQ

ALEXANDRA BR ALEXANDRA BR ALEXANDRA BR ALEXANDRA BR ALEXANDRA BR

CLARENCE ST

CLARENCE ST

CLARENCE ST

CLARENCE ST

CLARENCE ST

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

DA

LHO

US

IE S

T

DA

LHO

US

IE S

T

DA

LHO

US

IE S

T

DA

LHO

US

IE S

T

DA

LHO

US

IE S

T

ST. ANDREW

ST

ST. ANDREW

ST

ST. ANDREW

ST

ST. ANDREW

ST

ST. ANDREW

ST

PA

RE

NT A

VE

PA

RE

NT A

VE

PA

RE

NT A

VE

PA

RE

NT A

VE

PA

RE

NT A

VE

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

ST. ANDREW

ST

ST. ANDREW

ST

ST. ANDREW

ST

ST. ANDREW

ST

ST. ANDREW

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

GUIGUES A

VE

GUIGUES A

VE

GUIGUES A

VE

GUIGUES A

VE

GUIGUES A

VE CATHCART ST

CATHCART ST

CATHCART ST

CATHCART ST

CATHCART ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

ST. ANDREW

ST

ST. ANDREW

ST

ST. ANDREW

ST

ST. ANDREW

ST

ST. ANDREW

ST

CU

MB

ER

LA

ND

ST

CU

MB

ER

LA

ND

ST

CU

MB

ER

LA

ND

ST

CU

MB

ER

LA

ND

ST

CU

MB

ER

LA

ND

ST

GUIGUES A

VE

GUIGUES A

VE

GUIGUES A

VE

GUIGUES A

VE

GUIGUES A

VE BOLTON ST

BOLTON ST

BOLTON ST

BOLTON ST

BOLTON ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

CATHCART ST

CATHCART ST

CATHCART ST

CATHCART ST

CATHCART ST

CU

MB

ER

LA

ND

ST

CU

MB

ER

LA

ND

ST

CU

MB

ER

LA

ND

ST

CU

MB

ER

LA

ND

ST

CU

MB

ER

LA

ND

ST

BOLTON ST

BOLTON ST

BOLTON ST

BOLTON ST

BOLTON ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

BRUYERE ST

MURRAY ST MURRAY ST MURRAY ST

MURRAY ST MURRAY ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

GEORGE ST

GEORGE ST

GEORGE ST

GEORGE ST

GEORGE ST

DA

LHO

US

IE S

T

DA

LHO

US

IE S

T

DA

LHO

US

IE S

T

DA

LHO

US

IE S

T

DA

LHO

US

IE S

T

CLARENCE ST

CLARENCE ST

CLARENCE ST

CLARENCE ST

CLARENCE ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

WIL

LIA

M S

T

WIL

LIA

M S

T

WIL

LIA

M S

T

WIL

LIA

M S

T

WIL

LIA

M S

T

CLARENCE ST

CLARENCE ST

CLARENCE ST

CLARENCE ST

CLARENCE ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

CLARENCE ST

CLARENCE ST

CLARENCE ST

CLARENCE ST

CLARENCE ST

YO

RK S

T

YO

RK S

T

YO

RK S

T

YO

RK S

T

YO

RK S

T

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

PA

RE

NT

AV

E

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

DA

LH

OU

SIE

ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

GUIGUES A

VE

GUIGUES A

VE

GUIGUES A

VE

GUIGUES A

VE

GUIGUES A

VE

GUIGUES A

VE

GUIGUES A

VE

GUIGUES A

VE

GUIGUES A

VE

GUIGUES A

VE

CATHCART ST

CATHCART ST

CATHCART ST

CATHCART ST

CATHCART ST

BOLTON ST

BOLTON ST

BOLTON ST

BOLTON ST

BOLTON ST

WIL

LIA

M S

T

WIL

LIA

M S

T

WIL

LIA

M S

T

WIL

LIA

M S

T

WIL

LIA

M S

T

YORK ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

YORK ST

SITE

BH 2

BH 1

GUIGUES AVENUE

90 GUIGUES AVENUE

A.F.C.Approved by

OTTAWA, ONMs. SARAH FULFORD

Drawn by

Client Location

FIGURE 2

TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN

D.J.RProject No.13-186 1 : 250

Scale

Revision0

Title

DateJuly 2013

APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATION IN PLAN, CURRENTINVESTIGATION BY HOULE CHEVRIER ENGINEERING LTD.

LEGEND

TP 13-1

REFERENCE: PLAN PREPARED USING SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY FARLEY, SMITH & DENIS SURVEYING LTD.

APPROXIMATE BOREHOLE LOCATION IN PLAN, PREVIOUSINVESTIGATION BY HOULE CHEVRIER ENGINEERING LTD.

BH 1

TP13-1

TP13-2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0010.010.1110100

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

13-1

Test pit

FIGURE 3

Grain Size, mm

% P

assi

ng

Sample

SA3

Depth (m)

1.0 - 1.6

% > 75 µm

84.3

Legend

Project: 13-186

Date: July 2013

9.519.037.5 .150 .07526.5 2.36 1.18 .600 .300

Sieve Size, mm

4.75

Medium and Fine TexturedCoarse Textured

63.0

50.075.0

13.2

Environmental Protection Act - O. Reg. 153/04

when > 50% of particles by mass are75 µm or larger in diameter

when > 50% of particles by mass aresmaller than 75 µm in diameter

MO

E E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L G

RA

IN S

IZE

GR

AP

H 1

3-1

86 T

ES

T P

ITS

1-2

.GP

J H

OU

LE C

HE

VR

IER

FE

B 9

201

1.G

DT

9/7

/13

July 2013 TABLE 1

SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS

PETROLEUM PARAMETERS

Our ref: 13-186

TP 13-1 SA2 TP 13-2 SA1 TP 13-3 SA17

06/19/2013 06/19/2013 06/19/2013

PARAMETER UNITS MDL MOE Standard*

Benzene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) ND (0.02) ND (0.02) 0.21

Ethylbenzene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 2

Toluene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 2.3

m/p-xylene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) NS

o-xylene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) NS

Total Xylene** µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 3.1

F1 PHC's (C6-C10) µg/g dry 7 ND (7) ND (7) ND (7) 55




Notes:1 MDL - Method Detection Limit2 NS - No Standard3 ND - Not Detected4 N/A - Not Analysed

4

5 ** - Total Xylene is calculated using the sum of m/p-xylen and o-xylene6 Bold - Exceeds Selected MOE Standard7 Duplicate Sample of TP13-1 SA2

* - Table 7 Generic Site Condition Standards for Shallow Coarse Grained Soils in a Non-Potable Ground Water Condition

(Residential Property Use) found in the Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the

Environmental Protection Act (April 15, 2011)

Sample ID:

Date Sampled:

Page 1 of 1

July 2013 TABLE 2


METAL AND INORGANIC PARAMETERS

Our ref: 13-186

TP13-1 SA2 TP13-2 SA1 TP13-3 SA16

06/19/2013 06/19/2013 06/19/2013


Sodium Absorption Ratio N/A 0.01 7.71 2.62 5.98 5

Conductivity µS/cm 5 1990 596 1170 700

Cyanide, free µg/g dry 0.03 ND (0.03) ND (0.30) ND (0.30) 0.051

pH pH Units 0.05 7.44 7.32 7.55 5 - 9

Boron, available µg/g dry 0.5 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.5

Chromium (VI) µg/g dry 0.2 0.4 0.3 ND (0.2) 8

Mercury µg/g dry 0.1 ND (0.1) 1.4 ND (0.1) 0.27

Antimony µg/g dry 1 ND (1.0) ND (1.0) ND (1.0) 7.5

Arsenic µg/g dry 1 3.7 3.7 ND (1.0) 18

Barium µg/g dry 1 979 256 352 390

Beryllium µg/g dry 1 ND (1.0) ND (1.0) ND (1.0) 4

Boron µg/g dry 1 106 8.1 31.9 120

Cadmium µg/g dry 0.5 ND (0.5) ND (0.5) ND (0.5) 1.2

Chromium µg/g dry 1 3.9 19.7 8.9 160

Cobalt µg/g dry 1 2.5 5.7 2.6 22

Copper µg/g dry 1 64.9 22.1 23.9 140

Lead µg/g dry 1 184 317 79.1 120

Molybdenum µg/g dry 1 2.2 ND (1.0) ND (1.0) 6.9

Nickel µg/g dry 1 7.7 13.3 6.8 100

Selenium µg/g dry 1 ND (1.0) ND (1.0) ND (1.0) 2.4

Silver µg/g dry 0.5 ND (0.5) ND (0.5) ND (0.5) 20

Thallium µg/g dry 1 ND (1.0) ND (1.0) ND (1.0) 1

Uranium µg/g dry 1 ND (1.0) ND (1.0) ND (1.0) 23

Vanadium µg/g dry 1 8.2 22.9 13.0 86

Zinc µg/g dry 1 263 194 101 340

Notes:1 MDL - Method Detection Limit2 NS - No Standard3 ND - Not Detected

4

5 Bold - Exceeds Selected MOE Standard6 Duplicate Sample of TP13-1 SA2

Sample ID:

Date Sampled:

* - Table 7 Generic Site Condition Standards for Shallow Coarse Grained Soils in a Non-Potable Ground Water Condition

(Residential Property Use) found in the Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the

Environmental Protection Act (April 15, 2011)

Page 1 of 1

July 2013 TABLE 3


VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

Our ref: 13-186

TP13-1 SA2 TP13-2 SA1 TP13-3 SA16

06/19/2013 06/19/2013 06/19/2013


Acetone µg/g dry 0.5 ND (0.50) ND (0.50) ND (0.50) 16

Benzene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) ND (0.02) ND (0.02) 0.21

Bromodichloromethane µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 13

Bromoform µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.27

Bromomethane µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.05

Carbon Tetrachloride µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.05

Chlorobenzene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 2.4

Chloroethane µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) NS

Chloroform µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.05

Chloromethane µg/g dry 0.2 ND (0.20) ND (0.20) ND (0.20) NS

Dibromochloromethane µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 9.4

Dichlorodifluoromethane µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 16

1,2-Dibromoethane µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.05

1,2-Dichlorobenzene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 3.4



1,1-Dichloroethane µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 3.5

1,2-Dichloroethane µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.05

1,1-Dichloroethylene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.05

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 3.4

trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.084

1,2-Dichloroethylene, total µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) NS

1,2-Dichloropropane µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.05

cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) NS

trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) NS

1,3-Dichloropropene, total µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.05

Ethylbenzene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 2

Hexane µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 2.8

Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) µg/g dry 0.5 ND (0.50) ND (0.50) ND (0.50) 16

Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) µg/g dry 2 ND (2.00) ND (2.00) ND (2.00) NS

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone µg/g dry 0.5 ND (0.50) ND (0.50) ND (0.50) 1.7

Methyl tert-butyl ether µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.75

Methylene Chloride µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.1

Styrene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.7

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.058

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.05

Tetrachloroethylene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.28

Toluene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 2.3

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.36

1,1,1-Trichloroethane µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.38

1,1,2-Trichloroethane µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.05

Trichloroethylene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 0.061

Trichlorofluoromethane µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 4

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) NS

Vinyl Chloride µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) ND (0.02) ND (0.02) 0.02

m/p-Xylene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) NS

o-Xylene µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) NS

Xylenes, total µg/g dry 0.05 ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.05) 3.1



Sample ID:

Date Sampled:

4* - Table 7 Generic Site Condition Standards for Shallow Coarse Grained Soils in a Non-Potable Ground Water Condition (Residential

Property Use) found in the Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act

(April 15, 2011)

Page 1 of 1

July 2013 TABLE 4


POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS

Our ref: 13-186

TP13-1 SA2 TP13-2 SA1 TP13-3 SA16

06/19/2013 06/19/2013 06/19/2013


Acenaphthene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) ND (0.02) ND (0.02) 7.9

Acenaphthylene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) 0.18 ND (0.02) 0.15

Anthracene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) 0.16 ND (0.02) 0.67

Benzo[a]anthracene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) 0.89 ND (0.02) 0.5

Benzo[a]pyrene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) 1.09 ND (0.02) 0.3

Benzo[b]fluoranthene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) 1.54 ND (0.02) 0.78

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) 0.92 ND (0.02) 6.6

Benzo[k]fluoranthene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) 0.74 ND (0.02) 0.78

1,1-Biphenyl µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) ND (0.02) ND (0.02) 0.31

Chrysene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) 1.11 ND (0.02) 7

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) 0.18 ND (0.02) 0.1

Fluoranthene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) 1.37 ND (0.02) 0.69

Fluorene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) ND (0.02) ND (0.02) 62

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) 0.83 ND (0.02) 0.38

1-Methylnaphthalene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) ND (0.02) ND (0.02) 0.99

2-Methylnaphthalene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) 0.02 ND (0.02) 0.99

Methylnaphthalene (1&2) µg/g dry 0.04 ND (0.04) ND (0.04) ND (0.04) 0.99

Naphthalene µg/g dry 0.01 ND (0.01) 0.19 ND (0.01) 0.6

Phenanthrene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) 0.39 ND (0.02) 6.2

Pyrene µg/g dry 0.02 ND (0.02) 1.38 ND (0.02) 78



* - Table 7 Generic Site Condition Standards for Shallow Coarse Grained Soils in a Non-Potable Ground Water Condition (Residential

Property Use) found in the Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act

(April 15, 2011)

Sample ID:

Date Sampled:

4

Page 1 of 1



APPENDIX A

RECORD OF TEST PIT SHEETS

PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, Metals &Inorganics

Grain size distribution (Figure 3)

Backfilledwithexcavatedmaterial

Test pit dryuponcompletion

Crushed SAND and GRAVEL, trace silt

Dark brown silty sand, some gravel, withceramic pieces, concrete and ash (FILLMATERIAL)

Grey brown silty sand and gravel, trace clay(GLACIAL TILL)

Test pit terminated due to hydraulic bucketrefusal on bedrock

0.10

1.00

1.60

1

2

3

WATER LEVEL INOPEN TEST PIT

ORSTANDPIPE

INSTALLATION

DE

PT

H S

CA

LEM

ET

RE

S

ST

RA

TA

PLO

T

ELEV.DEPTH

(m)

SOIL PROFILE

DESCRIPTION

PROJECT: 13-186

LOCATION: See Test Pit Location Plan, Figure 2

DATE OF EXCAVATION: June 19, 2013

ADDITIONALLABORATORY TESTING

DEPTH SCALE

1 to 20Houle Chevrier Engineering Ltd.

COMBUSTIBLE VAPOUR READINGSON SAMPLE HEADSPACE

(PARTS PER MILLION)

LOGGED: A.N.

CHECKED:

RECORD OF TEST PIT 13-1

Ground Surface0

1

2

3

4

SA

MP

LE N

UM

BE

R

SHEET 1 OF 1

DATUM:

TYPE OF EXCAVATOR: Rubber tire backhoe

100 200 300 400

0

0

0

PHCs, VOCs, PAHs, Metals &Inorganics

Backfilledwithexcavatedmaterial

Test pit dryuponcompletion

Crushed SAND and GRAVEL, trace silt

ASPHALTIC CONCRETE

Dark brown silty sand, some gravel andcobbles, with glass, concrete, ceramic piecesand ash (FILL MATERIAL)

Test pit terminated due to presence of bones intest pit

0.08

0.18

0.91

1

WATER LEVEL INOPEN TEST PIT

ORSTANDPIPE

INSTALLATION

DE

PT

H S

CA

LEM

ET

RE

S

ST

RA

TA

PLO

T

ELEV.DEPTH

(m)

SOIL PROFILE

DESCRIPTION

PROJECT: 13-186

LOCATION: See Test Pit Location Plan, Figure 2

DATE OF EXCAVATION: June 19, 2013

ADDITIONALLABORATORY TESTING

DEPTH SCALE

1 to 20Houle Chevrier Engineering Ltd.

COMBUSTIBLE VAPOUR READINGSON SAMPLE HEADSPACE

(PARTS PER MILLION)

LOGGED: A.N.

CHECKED:

RECORD OF TEST PIT 13-2

Ground Surface0

1

2

3

4

SA

MP

LE N

UM

BE

R

SHEET 1 OF 1

DATUM:

TYPE OF EXCAVATOR: Rubber tire backhoe

100 200 300 400

0



APPENDIX B

LABORATORY CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS SOIL SAMPLES

Order Date: 19-Jun-2013 Report Date: 25-Jun-2013

Fax: (613) 836-9731Phone: (613) 836-1422

Client PO:

This Certificate of Analysis contains analytical data applicable to the following samples as submitted:

Custody: 96399

Attn: Brett PainterOttawa, ON K0A1L0180 Wescar Lane

Certificate of Analysis

Paracel ID Client ID

Houle Chevrier

Order #: 1325173

Project: 13-186

1325173-01 TP13-1 SA21325173-02 TP13-2 SA11325173-03 TP13-3 SA1

Approved By:Mark Foto, M.Sc. For Dale Robertson, BScLaboratory Director

Page 1 of 13

Any use of these results implies your agreement that our total liabilty in connection with this work, however arising shall be limited to the amount paid by you for this work, and that our employees or agents shall not under circumstances be liable to you in connection with this work

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 25-Jun-2013Order Date:19-Jun-2013

Client PO: Project Description: 13-186Houle Chevrier

Order #: 1325173

Analysis Summary Table

Analysis Method Reference/Description Extraction Date Analysis Date

MOE (HWE), EPA 200.7 - ICP-OES 21-Jun-13 21-Jun-13Boron, availableMOE E3056 - Extraction, colourimetric 20-Jun-13 25-Jun-13Chromium, hexavalentMOE E3138 - probe @25 °C, water ext 21-Jun-13 21-Jun-13ConductivityMOE E3015 - Auto Colour, water extraction 20-Jun-13 25-Jun-13Cyanide, freeEPA 7471A - CVAA, digestion 21-Jun-13 21-Jun-13Mercurybased on MOE E3470, ICP-OES 21-Jun-13 21-Jun-13MOE Metals by ICP-OES, soil

Reg 153EPA 8270 - GC-MS, extraction 20-Jun-13 22-Jun-13PAHs by GC-MSEPA 150.1 - pH probe @ 25 °C, CaCl buffered ext. 20-Jun-13 20-Jun-13pHCWS Tier 1 - P&T GC-FID 20-Jun-13 25-Jun-13PHC F1CWS Tier 1 - GC-FID, extraction 20-Jun-13 22-Jun-13PHC F2 - F4Calculation 24-Jun-13 24-Jun-13SARGravimetric, calculation 21-Jun-13 21-Jun-13Solids, %EPA 8260 - P&T GC-MS 20-Jun-13 25-Jun-13VOCs by P&T GC-MS

Page 2 of 13




Order #: 1325173

Client ID: TP13-1 SA2 TP13-2 SA1 TP13-3 SA1 -Sample Date: -19-Jun-1319-Jun-1319-Jun-13

1325173-01 1325173-02 1325173-03 -Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil -

Physical Characteristics

% Solids -84.980.567.50.1 % by Wt.

General Inorganics

SAR -5.982.627.710.01 N/A

Conductivity -117059619905 uS/cm

Cyanide, free -<0.30 [1]<0.30 [1]<0.030.03 ug/g dry

pH -7.557.327.440.05 pH Units

Metals

Antimony -<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Arsenic -<1.03.73.71.0 ug/g dry

Barium -3522569791.0 ug/g dry

Beryllium -<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Boron -31.98.11061.0 ug/g dry

Boron, available -1.01.11.00.5 ug/g dry

Cadmium -<0.5<0.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Chromium -8.919.73.91.0 ug/g dry

Chromium (VI) -<0.20.30.40.2 ug/g dry

Cobalt -2.65.72.51.0 ug/g dry

Copper -23.922.164.91.0 ug/g dry

Lead -79.13171841.0 ug/g dry

Mercury -<0.11.4<0.10.1 ug/g dry

Molybdenum -<1.0<1.02.21.0 ug/g dry

Nickel -6.813.37.71.0 ug/g dry

Selenium -<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Silver -<0.5<0.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Thallium -<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Uranium -<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Vanadium -13.022.98.21.0 ug/g dry

Zinc -1011942631.0 ug/g dry

Volatiles

Acetone -<0.50<0.50<0.500.50 ug/g dry

Benzene -<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Bromodichloromethane -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Bromoform -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Bromomethane -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Page 3 of 13




Order #: 1325173



Carbon Tetrachloride -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Chlorobenzene -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Chloroethane -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Chloroform -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Chloromethane -<0.20<0.20<0.200.20 ug/g dry

Dibromochloromethane -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Dichlorodifluoromethane -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

1,2-Dibromoethane -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

1,2-Dichlorobenzene -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry



1,1-Dichloroethane -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

1,2-Dichloroethane -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

1,1-Dichloroethylene -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

1,2-Dichloroethylene, total -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

1,2-Dichloropropane -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

1,3-Dichloropropene, total -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Ethylbenzene -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Hexane -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) -<0.50<0.50<0.500.50 ug/g dry

Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) -<2.00<2.00<2.002.00 ug/g dry

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone -<0.50<0.50<0.500.50 ug/g dry

Methyl tert-butyl ether -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Methylene Chloride -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Styrene -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Tetrachloroethylene -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Toluene -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Page 4 of 13




Order #: 1325173



1,1,1-Trichloroethane -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

1,1,2-Trichloroethane -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Trichloroethylene -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Trichlorofluoromethane -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Vinyl chloride -<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

m,p-Xylenes -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

o-Xylene -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Xylenes, total -<0.05<0.05<0.050.05 ug/g dry

4-Bromofluorobenzene Surrogate 96.4% 98.3% 99.8% -

Dibromofluoromethane Surrogate 111% 113% 116% -

Toluene-d8 Surrogate 99.3% 103% 102% -

Hydrocarbons

F1 PHCs (C6-C10) -<7<7<77 ug/g dry

F2 PHCs (C10-C16) -<4<4<44 ug/g dry

F3 PHCs (C16-C34) -<8<8<88 ug/g dry

F4 PHCs (C34-C50) -<6<6<66 ug/g dry

Semi-Volatiles

Acenaphthene -<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Acenaphthylene -<0.020.18<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Anthracene -<0.020.16<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] anthracene -<0.020.89<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] pyrene -<0.021.09<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [b] fluoranthene -<0.021.54<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [g,h,i] perylene -<0.020.92<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [k] fluoranthene -<0.020.74<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Biphenyl -<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Chrysene -<0.021.11<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene -<0.020.18<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Fluoranthene -<0.021.37<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Fluorene -<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene -<0.020.83<0.020.02 ug/g dry

1-Methylnaphthalene -<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

2-Methylnaphthalene -<0.020.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Methylnaphthalene (1&2) -<0.04<0.04<0.040.04 ug/g dry

Page 5 of 13




Order #: 1325173



Naphthalene -<0.010.19<0.010.01 ug/g dry

Phenanthrene -<0.020.39<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Pyrene -<0.021.38<0.020.02 ug/g dry

2-Fluorobiphenyl Surrogate 65.5% 61.6% 54.5% -

Terphenyl-d14 Surrogate 71.9% 68.0% 70.5% -

Page 6 of 13




Order #: 1325173

Method Quality Control: Blank

Analyte ResultReporting

Limit UnitsSourceResult %REC

%RECLimit RPD

RPDLimit Notes

General InorganicsConductivity ND 5 uS/cmCyanide, free ND 0.03 ug/g

HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) ND 7 ug/gF2 PHCs (C10-C16) ND 4 ug/gF3 PHCs (C16-C34) ND 8 ug/gF4 PHCs (C34-C50) ND 6 ug/g

MetalsAntimony ND 1.0 ug/gArsenic ND 1.0 ug/gBarium ND 1.0 ug/gBeryllium ND 1.0 ug/gBoron, available ND 0.5 ug/gBoron ND 1.0 ug/gCadmium ND 0.5 ug/gChromium ND 1.0 ug/gCobalt ND 1.0 ug/gCopper ND 1.0 ug/gLead ND 1.0 ug/gMercury ND 0.1 ug/gMolybdenum ND 1.0 ug/gNickel ND 1.0 ug/gSelenium ND 1.0 ug/gSilver ND 0.5 ug/gThallium ND 1.0 ug/gUranium ND 1.0 ug/gVanadium ND 1.0 ug/gZinc ND 1.0 ug/g

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene ND 0.02 ug/gAcenaphthylene ND 0.02 ug/gAnthracene ND 0.02 ug/gBenzo [a] anthracene ND 0.02 ug/gBenzo [a] pyrene ND 0.02 ug/gBenzo [b] fluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/gBenzo [g,h,i] perylene ND 0.02 ug/gBenzo [k] fluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/gBiphenyl ND 0.02 ug/gChrysene ND 0.02 ug/gDibenzo [a,h] anthracene ND 0.02 ug/gFluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/gFluorene ND 0.02 ug/gIndeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene ND 0.02 ug/g1-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.02 ug/g2-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.02 ug/gMethylnaphthalene (1&2) ND 0.04 ug/gNaphthalene ND 0.01 ug/gPhenanthrene ND 0.02 ug/gPyrene ND 0.02 ug/gSurrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 0.862 64.6 50-140ug/gSurrogate: Terphenyl-d14 0.886 66.4 50-140ug/g

VolatilesAcetone ND 0.50 ug/gBenzene ND 0.02 ug/gBromodichloromethane ND 0.05 ug/g

Page 7 of 13




Order #: 1325173

Method Quality Control: Blank



%RECLimit RPD

RPDLimit Notes

Bromoform ND 0.05 ug/gBromomethane ND 0.05 ug/gCarbon Tetrachloride ND 0.05 ug/gChlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/gChloroethane ND 0.05 ug/gChloroform ND 0.05 ug/gChloromethane ND 0.20 ug/gDibromochloromethane ND 0.05 ug/gDichlorodifluoromethane ND 0.05 ug/g1,2-Dibromoethane ND 0.05 ug/g1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/g1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/g1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/g1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g1,1-Dichloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/gcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/gtrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/g1,2-Dichloroethylene, total ND 0.05 ug/g1,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.05 ug/gcis-1,3-Dichloropropylene ND 0.05 ug/gtrans-1,3-Dichloropropylene ND 0.05 ug/g1,3-Dichloropropene, total ND 0.05 ug/gEthylbenzene ND 0.05 ug/gHexane ND 0.05 ug/gMethyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) ND 0.50 ug/gMethyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) ND 2.00 ug/gMethyl Isobutyl Ketone ND 0.50 ug/gMethyl tert-butyl ether ND 0.05 ug/gMethylene Chloride ND 0.05 ug/gStyrene ND 0.05 ug/g1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.05 ug/gTetrachloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/gToluene ND 0.05 ug/g1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/g1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.05 ug/gTrichloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/gTrichlorofluoromethane ND 0.05 ug/g1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.05 ug/gVinyl chloride ND 0.02 ug/gm,p-Xylenes ND 0.05 ug/go-Xylene ND 0.05 ug/gXylenes, total ND 0.05 ug/gSurrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 8.78 110 50-140ug/gSurrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 8.37 105 50-140ug/gSurrogate: Toluene-d8 8.70 109 50-140ug/g

Page 8 of 13




Order #: 1325173

Method Quality Control: Duplicate



%RECLimit RPD

RPDLimit Notes

General InorganicsConductivity 1980 5 uS/cm 1990 6.20.4Cyanide, free ND 0.30 ug/g dry ND 35 GEN02

pH 7.50 0.05 pH Units 7.56 100.8

HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) ND 7 ug/g dry ND 40F2 PHCs (C10-C16) ND 4 ug/g dry ND 30F3 PHCs (C16-C34) ND 8 ug/g dry ND 30F4 PHCs (C34-C50) ND 6 ug/g dry ND 30

MetalsAntimony 2.18 1.0 ug/g dry ND 300.0Arsenic 2.52 1.0 ug/g dry 2.30 309.1Barium 1110 100 ug/g dry 979 3012.1Beryllium ND 1.0 ug/g dry ND 300.0Boron, available 0.88 0.5 ug/g dry 1.01 3513.1Boron 111 10.0 ug/g dry 106 305.0Cadmium 1.03 0.5 ug/g dry ND 300.0Chromium 3.38 1.0 ug/g dry 3.92 3014.9Cobalt 2.69 1.0 ug/g dry 2.46 308.7Copper 76.1 1.0 ug/g dry 64.9 3015.8Lead 196 10.0 ug/g dry 184 306.6Mercury ND 0.1 ug/g dry ND 350.0Molybdenum 2.30 1.0 ug/g dry 2.21 304.2Nickel 8.26 1.0 ug/g dry 7.66 307.5Selenium 1.64 1.0 ug/g dry ND 300.0Silver ND 0.5 ug/g dry ND 30Thallium 3.24 1.0 ug/g dry ND 300.0Uranium ND 1.0 ug/g dry ND 30Vanadium 7.26 1.0 ug/g dry 8.21 3012.2Zinc 298 10.0 ug/g dry 263 3012.3

Physical Characteristics% Solids 88.2 0.1 % by Wt. 87.9 250.3

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 40Acenaphthylene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 40Anthracene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 400.0Benzo [a] anthracene ND 0.02 ug/g dry 0.024 400.0Benzo [a] pyrene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 40Benzo [b] fluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 40Benzo [g,h,i] perylene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 40Benzo [k] fluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 40Biphenyl ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 40Chrysene 0.023 0.02 ug/g dry 0.027 4017.9Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 40Fluoranthene 0.022 0.02 ug/g dry 0.038 40 QR-0152.4Fluorene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 40Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 401-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 402-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 40Naphthalene ND 0.01 ug/g dry ND 40Phenanthrene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 40Pyrene 0.024 0.02 ug/g dry 0.030 4023.6Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 1.09 ug/g dry 71.8 50-140NDSurrogate: Terphenyl-d14 1.06 ug/g dry 70.0 50-140ND

Page 9 of 13




Order #: 1325173

Method Quality Control: Duplicate



%RECLimit RPD

RPDLimit Notes

VolatilesAcetone ND 0.50 ug/g dry ND 50Benzene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 50Bromodichloromethane ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Bromoform ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Bromomethane ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Carbon Tetrachloride ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Chlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Chloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Chloroform ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Chloromethane ND 0.20 ug/g dry ND 50Dibromochloromethane ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 501,2-Dibromoethane ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 501,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 501,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 501,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 501,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 501,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 501,1-Dichloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 501,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Ethylbenzene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Hexane ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) ND 0.50 ug/g dry ND 50Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) ND 2.00 ug/g dry ND 50Methyl Isobutyl Ketone ND 0.50 ug/g dry ND 50Methyl tert-butyl ether ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Methylene Chloride ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Styrene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 501,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 501,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Tetrachloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Toluene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 501,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 501,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 501,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Trichloroethylene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Trichlorofluoromethane ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 501,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Vinyl chloride ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 50m,p-Xylenes ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50o-Xylene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 9.16 ug/g dry 97.2 50-140NDSurrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 11.2 ug/g dry 118 50-140NDSurrogate: Toluene-d8 9.96 ug/g dry 106 50-140ND

Page 10 of 13




Order #: 1325173

Method Quality Control: Spike


Limit Units SourceResult

%REC %RECLimit

RPDRPDLimit Notes

General InorganicsCyanide, free 0.237 ND 79.1 70-1300.03 ug/g

HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) 190 ND 94.9 80-1207 ug/gF2 PHCs (C10-C16) 83 ND 62.2 60-1404 ug/gF3 PHCs (C16-C34) 223 ND 81.0 60-1408 ug/gF4 PHCs (C34-C50) 122 ND 66.6 60-1406 ug/g

MetalsAntimony 313 ND 125 70-130ug/LArsenic 330 74.1 103 70-130ug/LBarium 251 ND 101 70-130ug/LBeryllium 273 1.59 108 70-130ug/LBoron, available 4.83 1.01 76.5 70-1220.5 ug/gBoron 433 219 85.7 70-130ug/LCadmium 304 ND 121 70-130ug/LChromium 296 78.4 87.0 70-130ug/LCobalt 266 49.2 86.7 70-130ug/LCopper 624 406 86.9 70-130ug/LLead 254 ND 102 70-130ug/LMercury 1.60 ND 107 72-1280.1 ug/gMolybdenum 263 44.2 87.7 70-130ug/LNickel 367 153 85.3 70-130ug/LSelenium 262 ND 105 70-130ug/LSilver 308 ND 123 70-130ug/LThallium 256 ND 102 70-130ug/LUranium 212 ND 84.9 70-130ug/LVanadium 391 164 90.9 70-130ug/LZinc 235 ND 94.1 70-130ug/L

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene 0.136 ND 71.9 50-1400.02 ug/gAcenaphthylene 0.132 ND 69.8 50-1400.02 ug/gAnthracene 0.173 ND 91.0 50-1400.02 ug/gBenzo [a] anthracene 0.173 0.024 78.6 50-1400.02 ug/gBenzo [a] pyrene 0.147 ND 77.7 50-1400.02 ug/gBenzo [b] fluoranthene 0.192 ND 101 50-1400.02 ug/gBenzo [g,h,i] perylene 0.157 ND 82.7 50-1400.02 ug/gBenzo [k] fluoranthene 0.203 ND 107 50-1400.02 ug/gBiphenyl 0.165 ND 87.2 50-1400.02 ug/gChrysene 0.216 0.027 99.8 50-1400.02 ug/gDibenzo [a,h] anthracene 0.146 ND 77.2 50-1400.02 ug/gFluoranthene 0.175 0.038 72.4 50-1400.02 ug/gFluorene 0.113 ND 59.8 50-1400.02 ug/gIndeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene 0.187 ND 98.4 50-1400.02 ug/g1-Methylnaphthalene 0.120 ND 63.1 50-1400.02 ug/g2-Methylnaphthalene 0.111 ND 58.4 50-1400.02 ug/gNaphthalene 0.126 ND 66.6 50-1400.01 ug/gPhenanthrene 0.137 ND 72.3 50-1400.02 ug/gPyrene 0.161 0.030 69.3 50-1400.02 ug/gSurrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 0.852 56.1 50-140ug/g

Page 11 of 13




Order #: 1325173

Method Quality Control: Spike


Limit Units SourceResult

%REC %RECLimit

RPDRPDLimit Notes

VolatilesAcetone 12.0 ND 120 50-1400.50 ug/gBenzene 3.84 ND 96.0 60-1300.02 ug/gBromodichloromethane 4.10 ND 103 60-1300.05 ug/gBromoform 3.32 ND 82.9 60-1300.05 ug/gBromomethane 3.41 ND 85.2 50-1400.05 ug/gCarbon Tetrachloride 3.82 ND 95.5 60-1300.05 ug/gChlorobenzene 3.85 ND 96.3 60-1300.05 ug/gChloroethane 5.13 ND 128 50-1400.05 ug/gChloroform 3.91 ND 97.7 60-1300.05 ug/gChloromethane 4.96 ND 124 50-1400.20 ug/gDibromochloromethane 3.44 ND 86.0 60-1300.05 ug/gDichlorodifluoromethane 4.67 ND 117 50-1400.05 ug/g1,2-Dibromoethane 3.04 ND 76.0 60-1300.05 ug/g1,2-Dichlorobenzene 3.38 ND 84.5 60-1300.05 ug/g1,3-Dichlorobenzene 4.83 ND 121 60-1300.05 ug/g1,4-Dichlorobenzene 3.50 ND 87.6 60-1300.05 ug/g1,1-Dichloroethane 3.81 ND 95.3 60-1300.05 ug/g1,2-Dichloroethane 3.80 ND 94.9 60-1300.05 ug/g1,1-Dichloroethylene 4.84 ND 121 60-1300.05 ug/gcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 3.81 ND 95.3 60-1300.05 ug/gtrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 4.17 ND 104 60-1300.05 ug/g1,2-Dichloropropane 3.74 ND 93.4 60-1300.05 ug/gcis-1,3-Dichloropropylene 2.77 ND 69.2 60-1300.05 ug/gtrans-1,3-Dichloropropylene 2.99 ND 74.6 60-1300.05 ug/gEthylbenzene 3.72 ND 93.0 60-1300.05 ug/gHexane 2.87 ND 71.7 60-1300.05 ug/gMethyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 8.41 ND 84.1 50-1400.50 ug/gMethyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 9.14 ND 91.4 50-1402.00 ug/gMethyl Isobutyl Ketone 9.79 ND 97.9 50-1400.50 ug/gMethyl tert-butyl ether 9.71 ND 97.1 50-1400.05 ug/gMethylene Chloride 3.55 ND 88.6 60-1300.05 ug/gStyrene 3.31 ND 82.8 60-1300.05 ug/g1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.80 ND 95.0 60-1300.05 ug/g1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 4.38 ND 109 60-1300.05 ug/gTetrachloroethylene 2.95 ND 73.7 60-1300.05 ug/gToluene 3.86 ND 96.4 60-1300.05 ug/g1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2.46 ND 61.4 60-1300.05 ug/g1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.59 ND 89.8 60-1300.05 ug/g1,1,2-Trichloroethane 3.01 ND 75.2 60-1300.05 ug/gTrichloroethylene 4.85 ND 121 60-1300.05 ug/gTrichlorofluoromethane 4.60 ND 115 50-1400.05 ug/g1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 4.06 ND 102 60-1300.05 ug/gVinyl chloride 4.46 ND 111 50-1400.02 ug/gm,p-Xylenes 7.53 ND 94.2 60-1300.05 ug/go-Xylene 3.75 ND 93.8 60-1300.05 ug/g

Page 12 of 13




Order #: 1325173

Qualifier Notes :

Sample Qualifiers :

Elevated Reporting Limit due to matrix interference. :1

QC Qualifiers :

Duplicate RPD is high, however, the sample result is less than 10x the MDL.QR-01 :

Sample Data RevisionsNone

Work Order Revisions / Comments :

None

Other Report Notes :

MDL: Method Detection Limit

n/a: not applicable

Source Result: Data used as source for matrix and duplicate samples%REC: Percent recovery.RPD: Relative percent difference.

ND: Not Detected

Soil results are reported on a dry weight basis when the units are denoted with 'dry'.Where %Solids is reported, moisture loss includes the loss of volatile hydrocarbons.

CCME PHC additional information:

- The method for the analysis of PHCs complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory. All prescribed quality criteria identified in the method has been met.

- F1 range corrected for BTEX.- F2 to F3 ranges corrected for appropriate PAHs where available.

- In the case where F4 and F4G are both reported, the greater of the two results is to be used for comparison to CWS PHC criteria.- The gravimetric heavy hydrocarbons (F4G) are not to be added to C6 to C50 hydrocarbons.

Page 13 of 13



APPENDIX C

LETTER BY DR. MARTHA FULFORD

Affiliated with the Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University

C H E D O K E C H I L D R E N ’ S G E N E R A L H E N D E R S O N M c M A S T E R

Sarah Fulford 90 Guigues Avenue Ottawa, Ontario K1N 5H7 June 20, 2013 Dear Sarah:

Re: Bones found at 90 Guigues Avenue After reviewing the two photographs you sent, I would determine that the bones are animal bones. The appearance is not consistent with human bones. The one feature that particularly suggests animal bones is the bifid condyle. I showed the two photographs to orthopedic surgeon colleagues of mine (Drs. Mah and Burrow) who concurred that the bones in the photographs are animal bones. Regards,

Martha Fulford

Martha Fulford, MD, MA, FRCP(C) Division of Infectious Diseases

Department of Medicine McMaster University Medical Centre

1200 Main Street West Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5

Telephone: (905) 521-2100 Extension: 76992 Fax: 905-521-4971

Affiliated with the Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University

C H E D O K E C H I L D R E N ’ S G E N E R A L H E N D E R S O N M c M A S T E R

report on limited phase ii environmental site …

Documents