limited phase ii environmental site assessment for the proposed

Limited Phase II Environmental

Site Assessment for the Proposed

Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility

334 West Wheeling Street

Lancaster, Ohio

Submitted to:

Fairfield County

Board of Commissioners

210 East Main Street

Lancaster, Ohio 43130

Prepared by:Bennett & Williams Environmental Consultants, Inc.

98 County Line Road West, Suite C

Westerville, Ohio 43082

(614) 882-9122 July 7, 2014

i

RELIABILITY OF REPORT - DISCLAIMER

Conclusions reached in this report are based upon the objective data available to

the CONSULTANTS at the time of forming their opinions and as presented in the report.

The accuracy of the report depends upon the accuracy of these data. Every effort is made

to evaluate the information by the methods that generally are recognized to constitute the

state of the art at the time of rendering the report and conclusions, and the conclusions

reached herein represent our opinions. Subsurface conditions are known to vary both in

space and time, and there is inherent risk in the extrapolation of data.

THE CONSULTANTS are not responsible for actual conditions proved to be

materially at variance with the data that were available to them and upon which they

relied, as presented in the report.

The opinions, conclusions and recommendations shown in the report are put forth

for a specific and proposed purpose and for the specific site discussed. The

CONSULTANTS are not responsible for any other application, whether of purpose or

location, of our opinions, conclusions and recommendations other than as specifically

indicated in the report.

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

DISCLAIMER i

LIST OF TABLES v

LIST OF FIGURES viii

LIST OF APPENDICES ix

1. INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 Introduction 1

1.2 Documents Reviewed 2

1.3 Site Location 2

1.4 Historical Changes in the Site Vicinity 4

2. HISTORY OF THE SITE 7

2.1 Introduction 7

2.2 Review of Previous Property Ownership 7

2.3 Review of Historical Land Use 9

3. SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION 21

3.1 Introduction 21

3.2 Investigation Design 26

3.3 Drilling and Soil Sampling 28

3.4 Groundwater Sampling 34

3.5 Temporary Monitoring Well Abandonment 35

4. ANALYTICAL RESULTS 36

4.1 Introduction 36

4.2 Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure in Soils (TCLP) 37

4.2.1 Introduction 37

4.2.2 TCLP Metals Results 38

4.2.3 TCLP Volatile Organic Compounds Results 38

4.2.4 TCLP Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds Results 41

4.2.5 TCLP Summary 41

4.3 Characterization of Soils by Other Methods of Analysis 41


4.3.2 Total Metals Results in Soil 44

4.3.3 Total VOC Results in Soil 48

iii

4.3.4 Total SVOC Results in Soil 48

4.3.5 GRO and DRO Results in Soil 55

4.3.6 Soil Results Summary 55

4.4 Characterization of Groundwater in the Fill Materials 56


4.4.2 Total and Dissolved Metals Results in Groundwater

Within the Fill 57

4.4.3 VOC Results in Groundwater Within the Fill 60

4.4.4 Groundwater Within the Fill Results Summary 61

5. RISK ASSESSMENT 62

5.1 Introduction 62

5.2 Data Evaluation 62

5.3 Exposure Assessment 66

5.3.1 Characterization of Exposure Setting 66

5.3.2 Potential Receptors and Exposure Pathways 69

5.3.3 Quantification of Exposure 70

5.4 Dermal Exposure 75

5.4.1 Determination of Dermal Absorbed Dose 75

5.4.2 Non-Cancer Effects 76

5.4.3 Carcinogenic Effects 79

5.4.4 Uncertainty in the Dermal Risk Analysis 81

5.4.4.1 Csoil 81

5.4.4.2 Event Time (EV) 81

5.4.4.3 Surface Area 81

5.4.4.4 Frequency of Exposure 81

5.4.4.5 Adherence Factors 81

5.4.4.6 Absorption Factors 82

5.4.4.7 Toxicity Assessment 82

5.4.5 Risk from Multiple Chemicals 82

5.5 Inhalation of Outdoor Air – Volatile Compounds 83

5.5.1 Estimating Concentrations of Chemicals in Air 83



5.6 Inhalation of Outdoor Air – Particulates 88

5.6.1 Estimating Concentrations of Chemicals as Particulates

in Air 88



5.7 Uncertainty Associated with Inhalation Risk Analysis 93

5.7.1 Calculation of Concentrations in Air 93

5.7.2 Calculation of Exposure Concentrations 93

5.7.3 Toxicity Assessment 93

5.7.4 Estimating Carcinogenic Risks 93

5.7.5 Risk from Multiple Chemicals 93

5.7.5.1 Inhalation of Volatile Chemicals 94

iv

5.7.5.2 Inhalation of Particulate Chemicals 94

5.8 Summary of Total Risk to Construction and Excavation

Workers 95

5.8.1 Non-Cancer Risks (Dermal Plus Inhalation) 95

5.8.2 Carcinogenic Risks (Dermal Plus Inhalation) 97

5.8.3 Total Risk (Dermal Plus Inhalation) 97

5.9 Indoor Air Risk Assessment 97

5.9.1 Calculation of Exposure Concentrations 97

5.9.2 Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Risks 98

5.9.3 Uncertainty Associated with Indoor Risk Analysis 102

5.10 Risk Assessment for Lead 103

5.10.1 Adult Lead Methodology 103

5.10.2 Assumptions of Adult Lead Methodology 104

5.10.3 Managing Risks due to Lead Exposure 106

6. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 108

6.1 Introduction 108

6.2 Hazardous Waste 108

6.3 Solid Waste 109

6.4 Beneficial Use 111

6.5 Voluntary Action 111

6.6 Drinking and Ground Water 112

6.7 Surface Water 113

6.8 Air 113

7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 115

7.1 Conclusions 115

7.2 Recommendations 118

8. REFERENCES 120

v

LIST OF TABLES

1. Location and depth (in feet below ground) of analytes in soil samples 30

2. Summary of encountered subsurface conditions 32

3. Analytical results for TCLP of RCRA metals 39

4. Analytical results for TCLP VOCs 40

5. Analytical results for TCLP SVOCs 42

6. Analytical results for metals in soils compared to VAP generic direct contact

soil values for construction/excavation activities 45


soil values for residential exposure 46


soil values for commercial/industrial exposure 47

9. “Target compound list” of VOCs analyzed in soil 49

10. Analytical results for VOCs in soil compared to VAP generic direct contact

soil values for construction/excavation, residential, and commercial/industrial

exposures 50

11. “Target compound list” of SVOCs analyzed in soil 51

12. Analytical results for SVOCs in soil compared to VAP generic direct contact

soil values for construction/excavation activities 52


soil values for residential exposure 53


soil values for commercial/industrial exposure 54

15. Analytical results gasoline range organics (GRO) and diesel range

organics (DRO) in soil 55

16. Analytical results for total metals in groundwater in the fill 58

17. Analytical results for dissolved metals in groundwater in the fill 59

vi

18. Analytical results for VOCs in groundwater in the fill 61

19. Analytical results for metals in soil samples 63

20. Analytical results for VOCs in soil samples 64

21. Analytical results for SVOCs in soil samples 65

22. Toxicity values for chemicals of concern 67

23. Exposure pathways for risk assessment 69

24. Statistical summary of inorganic sampling results used in the dermal risk

assessment (0-8 feet) 71

25. Statistical summary of organic sampling results used in the dermal risk


26. Statistical summary of inorganic sampling results used in the inhalation risk


27. Statistical summary of organic sampling results used in the inhalation risk


28. Dermal absorption fraction from soil for chemicals in the dermal risk

assessment 77

29. Hazard quotients for chemicals of concern for the dermal exposure pathway 78

30. Toxic equivalency factors for PAHs and equivalent calculated concentrations 80

31. Dermal cancer risk for chemicals of concern 84

32. Calculation of concentrations of volatile COCs in air 85

33. Hazard quotients for volatile COCs – inhalation pathway 86

34. Cancer risks associated with the inhalation of volatilized COCs 88

35. Calculation of concentrations of particulate COCs in air 89

36. Hazard quotients for particulate COCs – inhalation pathway 91

37. Cancer risks associated with the inhalation of particulate COCs 92

vii

38. Total non-carcinogenic risks to construction and excavation workers 96

39. Total carcinogenic risks to construction and excavation workers 97

40. Input parameters for the Johnson and Ettinger model – soil parameters 99

41. Input parameters for the Johnson and Ettinger model – building parameters 100

42. Input parameters for the Johnson and Ettinger model – exposure scenarios 100

43. Results from the Johnson and Ettinger model 101

44. Statistical summary of lead concentration data in soil at the site (0-8 feet) 104

45. Calculations of blood lead concentrations (PbBs) using ALM 105

viii

LIST OF FIGURES

1. Site location map of proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility 3

2. Historic physiographic features of the site (natural channel of Hocking River

and Ohio Canal) (Sanborn® Fire Insurance Map, April 1884) 5

3. Historic (1910) plat map of site (Fairfield County Auditor’s Office) 8

4. Historic land use (1899) showing limited site development in floodplain

except by Thimmes Brothers (Sanborn® Fire Insurance Map, December 1899) 10

5. Historic land use (1904) showing development and proximity of Alten’s

Iron and Steel Works to site (Sanborn® Fire Insurance Map, December 1904) 12

6. 2012 delineation of 100-year floodplain (blue hachures) and floodway

(red hachures) in the site vicinity (Fairfield County Auditor’s site) 14

7. 1938 aerial photograph of site showing remnant buildings (former meat packing

operation) used as foundry supply warehouse and suspected fill activities

(Fairfield County Soil and Water Conservation District) 15

8. Looking south at the tree (and commemorative plaque) in Miller Park Wellfield

planted in honor of General Sherman in 1928. Note the proximity of the

current Fairfield County Sheriff’s Office in the background 16

9. Looking south at the dead tree in Miller Park Wellfield. The tree was

originally planted in 1928 by the Woman’s Relief Corps. Note the proximity of

the current Fairfield County Sheriff’s Office in the background 18

10. Close-up of the Women’s Relief Corps plaque commemorating the planting

of the tree 18

11. Depression around the trunk of the General Sherman tree in the Miller Park

Wellfield showing the approximate original grade at the time of planting 19

12. Guardrail in Miller Park Wellfield (on left) delineating a change in grade

with Well 4 in the center of the photograph 19

13. Boring locations (Solar, 1999) 23

14. Boring locations and approximate location of Old Hocking River Channel

(Geotechnical Consultants, Inc., 2011) 25

15. Sampling locations with proposed building footprint 27

ix

LIST OF APPENDICES

A Photographs of project field activities

B Boring logs

C Monitoring well completion diagrams and driller logs filed with the Ohio

Department of Natural Resources (ODNR)

D Water well sealing reports filed with ODNR

E Soil analytical results for borings BW-1, BW-2, BW-3 and BW-4

F Soil analytical results for borings BW-5 and BW-6

G Soil analytical results for borings BW-7 and BW-8

H Soil analytical results for borings BW-9 and BW-10

I Soil analytical results for borings BW-7A, BW-8A, BW-9A and BW-10A and water

analytical results for temporary monitoring wells BW-1 and BW-2

J Statistical summary and UCL calculations for inorganic chemicals of concern for

dermal exposure (0-8 feet)

K Statistical summary and UCL calculations for organic chemicals of concern for


L Statistical summary and UCL calculations for inorganic chemicals of concern for

inhalation exposure (0-12 feet)

M Statistical summary and UCL calculations for organic chemicals of concern for


N Outputs from the Johnson and Ettinger Model used to evaluate risks posed by

volatile compounds in indoor air

O Statistical summary and UCL calculations for lead (0-8 feet)

1

SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction

This report presents the results of a limited Phase II environmental site assessment that

was conducted on property located at 334 West Wheeling Street, Lancaster, Ohio where the

Board of Fairfield County Commissioners proposes to construct a new Fairfield County

Jail/Public Safety Facility. Based on preliminary geotechnical subsurface investigations on the

property conducted after acquisition of the property by the Commissioners in 1993, the site was

found to have approximately 6 to 18 feet of fill materials covering the site. The primary purpose

of this investigation was to conduct an initial subsurface environmental sampling and analysis

program to develop information about the chemical characteristics of the existing undocumented

fill materials underlying the proposed footprint of new structure. Specifically, the objective was

to evaluate the fill materials for the possible presence of hazardous substances that would

warrant environmental management of the material during future site redevelopment.

In addition, available information from the previous geotechnical reports indicated that

portions of the fill materials were saturated. Therefore, the secondary objective of the

investigation was to collect representative groundwater samples and analyze for the possible

presence of hazardous substances from existing saturated zones within the fill materials, where

encountered. Potential constituents in groundwater in the fill were deemed important because

the City of Lancaster operates a public wellfield in Miller Park, immediately north of the site, on

the north side of Wheeling Street. Further, documentation of geologic materials immediately

underlying the fill was also undertaken.

Due to the critical timetable imposed by the impending development of the site, the scope

was limited in order to evaluate more quickly the shallow subsurface soil immediately

underlying the proposed building footprint. It was recognized that based on the results of this

investigation (and depending on the final use of other portions of the site, including but not

limited to the current jail facility on the site and/or the former car wash and former auto

dealership areas), additional efforts may be necessary.

Upon receipt of the analytical results of the subsurface investigation, and the comparison

of the results to potential regulatory values, the scope of the environmental site assessment

investigation was amended to include risk analysis that would enable the Board of Fairfield

County Commissioners to exercise due care with respect to any future site development and

construction activities. Potential pathways of exposure were evaluated for completeness, and

potential risk was calculated for complete pathways.

As part of the efforts undertaken, we worked with and received information from

representatives of Fairfield County concerning past investigations, potential historical uses of the

sites, and potential concerns about environmental conditions as voiced by concerned citizenry.

We also worked with representatives from Wachtel & McAnally Architects to understand the

2

proposed location of the structure, potential subsurface disturbance, final land use disposition,

and anticipated timetables of construction activities.

1.2 Documents Reviewed

As part of the development of a site-specific investigation plan, portions of documents

provided by County staff relating to the site were preliminarily reviewed to gain background

information including:

• Phase 1 Environmental Property Assessment, Proposed County Minimum

Security Jail, 342 West Wheeling Street, Lancaster, Ohio, prepared by Beling

Consultants, March 1992;

• Environmental Assessment Report, 121 North Memorial Street, Lancaster, Ohio

43130, prepared by Lawhon & Associates, February 12, 1993;

• Wellhead Protection Plan, City of Lancaster, Ohio, Miller Park Wellfield,

prepared by URS, August 23, 1993;

• Preliminary Potential Contaminant Source Inventory, City of Lancaster, Miller

Park Wellfield, prepared by URS, August 23, 1993;

• Beling Consultants review of BBC&M Engineering Inc. report on subsurface

investigation for the Charley Horse and surrounding property, May 19, 1994;

• Geotechnical Investigation for 342 West Wheeling Street, 4.01 Acre Site,

Proposed Juvenile Detention Center, Lancaster, Ohio, prepared by Solar Testing

Laboratories, Inc., February 19, 1999;

• Site Analysis and Selection for the Fairfield County Public Safety Facility,

prepared by Shremshock Architects, Inc., September 11, 2007; and

• Subsurface Exploration and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report,

Proposed Fairfield County Justice Center-MSMJ Site, 342 West Wheeling Street,

Lancaster, Ohio, prepared by Geotechnical Consultants, Inc., June 10, 2011.

Additional documents and information were subsequently reviewed as part of our

investigation. The additional documentation is described further in this report. All referenced

documents are included in Section 8, References.

1.3 Site Location

The footprint of the proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility is situated on

four irregular-shaped parcels (current tax parcel numbers 0536001800, 0536001700 (two), and

0536801700) totaling approximately 7.5 acres in size (Figure 1). The property is located within

the limits of the City of Lancaster. The site is bounded on the north by West Wheeling Street.

H ock ingRi v er

Fairfield CountyMaintenance Garage

Former Car WashKings Furniture

Roger Conrad Concrete

Billboard

Lancaster WaterTreatment Plant

Scotts Service Center

Miller ParkGuardrail

Well #4

Well #16

Dead Tree

General Sherman Tree

Fairfield CountySheriff's Office

Municipal Well

MW-4S and 4D

Municipal Well

0536801700

05360018000536001700

0536001700

LINCOLN AVE

W WHEELING ST

N MEMORIAL DR

THOM

AS AV

E

W MAIN ST

WHILEY AVE

N GE

ORGE

ST W MULBERRY ST

S MEMORIAL DR

W CHESTNUT ST

W MAIN ST

W MULBERRY ST

Hocking River

/0 100 200 30050

Feet

Figure 1.Site location map ofproposed Fairfield CountyJail/Public Safety Facility.

1 inch = 200 feet

4

Immediately north of Wheeling Street is the Lancaster Miller Park wellfield and water treatment

plant. On the west, the site is bounded by the channelized course of the Hocking River (that used

to flow through the current site). On the south, the parcels are bounded by the Fairfield County

Maintenance Garage (owned by the Fairfield County Commissioners), a former car wash (now

owned by the Fairfield County Commissioners), Kings Furniture (property owned by Mitch and

Ann D. Endick), Roger Conrad Concrete (property owned by Mary Margaret Kensler), and a

billboard (property owned by Jay Nauman), which all front on Lincoln Avenue (US Route 22).

On the east, the site is bounded by Memorial Drive (US Route 33), except for the corner of West

Wheeling Street and Memorial Drive, which is occupied by Scotts Service Center (an automotive

service station, property owned by the Fairfield Paint & Oil Company).

As shown in Figure 1, the current Fairfield County Sheriff’s office occupies the

northwest portion of the site. The remainder of the property is either paved or is a concrete slab

where another building was previously located (note light-colored rectangle just east of the

Sheriff’s office). Both the pavement and the concrete slab are currently used as parking lot.

South of the building, the Fairfield County Sheriff’s office has a small impound lot and a bin for

recycling. Small islands of grass and trees for landscaping are present primarily to the west of

the current building and along the Hocking River.

1.4 Historical Changes in the Site Vicinity

There have been numerous changes in the vicinity of the site since 1800. It was during

this year that Governor Arthur St. Clair first organized Fairfield County by proclamation

(although Fairfield County was much larger than it is today) (Scott, 1877). According to Scott

(1877), it did not take long for the development of the County to begin. In fact, by the fall of

1800, Ebenezer Zane first sold lots in the town of Lancaster. Understanding these events and

subsequent historical activities assists in reviewing maps through time for a better understanding

of land usage and historical geography.

A review of historic plat maps for Section 1 of Hocking Township in Fairfield County,

the City of Lancaster, and Sanborn® maps of the area reveal man-made physiographic and

developmental changes that have occurred at the site since 1880. Prior to the 1880s, the

Lancaster Lateral connector (completed in 1834) to the Ohio and Erie Canal formed the east

boundary of the site (present-day Memorial Drive). Also, Wheeling Street terminated at the east

side of the canal and, therefore, did not exist across the northern boundary of the site. The

Hocking River (prior to relocation to the west and channelization) crossed through the site,

entering from the north and then curving to the west (Figure 2). The approximate location of the

current-day parcel is shown in yellow for site orientation.

Site

/0 50 100 15025

Feet

Figure 2.Historic physiographicfeatures of site(natural channel ofHocking River andOhio Canal).

1 inch = 100 feet

Sanborn® Fire Insurance Map(April 1884)

6

Based on a review of Sanborn® maps, the Hocking River was straightened and realigned

to its present-day position along the west side of the site between 1884 and 1889. Soon after,

(between 1893 and 1899), the Lancaster Lateral of the Ohio Canal was abandoned and a roadway

was constructed over the abandoned canal. This roadway was known at the time as Front Street,

and later became Memorial Drive (US Route 33). Lastly, between 1899 and 1904, West

Wheeling Street was extended west of Front Street along the present day northern boundary of

the site. [It should also be noted that historic Sanborn® maps prior to 1919 designate today’s

Lincoln Avenue as “Main Avenue”; the western extension of (West) Main Street.]

7

SECTION 2

HISTORY OF THE SITE

2.1 Introduction

To establish the context for this subsurface environmental investigation, Bennett &

Williams reviewed publicly available deed records, historic plat maps, Phase I environmental site

assessment reports, geotechnical studies, and sanitary surveys for the land parcels comprising the

site as well as historic biographical records, texts and Sanborn® maps (1884 through 1929,

including revisions to the 1929 map in 1933, 1945 and 1949) of the area. These historical

reports, maps, studies and surveys provide further insight into previous land ownership as well as

commercial and industrial activities that may have involved the use or release of environmentally

regulated materials at the site. This historical background information is used as a basis for

identifying recognized environmental conditions at the site that are the focus of this subsurface

investigation.

2.2 Review of Previous Property Ownership

A review of publicly-available Phase I environmental site assessment reports for the

properties, a title search from June 2, 1948 through January 14, 2014 conducted by the Assistant

Prosecuting Attorney relating to easements (Porter, 2014a and 2014b), together with a

supplemental review of deed records and historic plat maps available at the Fairfield County

Auditor’s Office, was conducted to establish a chain-of-title ownership of the various tracts of

land that today comprise the site. Findings from this review show that on June 23, 1903 Louis J.

Snyder and Jacob Keller acquired the majority of the tracts of land (6.78 acres) that comprise the

site from Nina Rauch (recent widow of Francis Xavier Rauch) and other heirs. In addition, a

smaller tract of land (0.66 acres) that is included in the site was deeded to John Thimmes and his

brothers (Christian, Charles and William Thimmes) by Christena Nester (widow of Philip

Nester) and other heirs on April 16, 1891 along with a second tract that John Thimmes and his

brothers were deeded from their father Mathias Thimmes, on April 28, 1892, who purchased the

property from Philip Nester on November 11, 1877. A historic plat map from the Fairfield

County Auditor’s Office, dated January 1910, depicts the layout of the Snyder and Keller

property and the Thimmes brother’s property at that time (Figure 3).

Additional information on the chronology of the chain-of-title (ownership) of these two

properties is as follows. John Thimmes and his brothers sold their property September 24, 1919

to George M. Schmidt. A month later, the property was deeded to The Lancaster Packing

Company on November 29, 1919. George H. Alten was deeded the Snyder and Keller property,

acquiring Louis J. Snyder’s one-half interest on March 31, 1921 and Keller’s one-half interest (at

Sheriff’s sale) on November 28, 1921. Then, on September 23, 1935, George H. Alten

purchased the Lancaster Packing Company (the former Thimmes brother’s property). As a

result, by 1936 George H. Alten had complete ownership of the site.

West Wheeling Street

Main Avenue

Front Street W. MainStreet

/

Figure 3.Historic (1910) plat mapof site (Fairfield CountyAuditor's Office).

9

It remained this way until July 8, 1954 when George H. Alten sold off a 2.4 acre parcel in

the northwest corner of the site (comprising the current property tax parcel 0536001800) to

Herbert Welsh and Harry Lemley. Approximately two years later on July 6, 1956, Herbert

Welsh and Harry Lemley deeded the 2.4 acre parcel to Brown Gold Realty, who in turn, deeded

the parcel to C. Hart Manufacturing Company on January 16, 1961. On that same day in January

of 1961, C. Hart Manufacturing Company deeded the parcel to Anncor Company, Inc. who

maintained ownership of the parcel until deeding the property to the Fairfield County Board of

Commissioners on September 28, 1992.

The remaining approximate 4.8 acre portion of the site (comprising the current property

tax parcels 0536801700 and 0536001700) remained under the ownership of George H. Alten

(subject to lease and mortgage agreements starting in July of 1962), until his death on October

13, 1970. The Huntington Trust Company, as Trustee under The George H. Alten Trust, dated

February 25, 1969, was appointed co-executor of the estate on November 24, 1970 and Trustee

of the 4.8 acre parcel listed as Tract No. 30 on the Certificate for Transfer of Real Estate. The

Huntington Trust Company remained the Trustee of the parcel until deeding the property to the

Fairfield County Board of Commissioners on March 5, 1993.

2.3 Review of Historical Land Use

Findings from the historical land use review and previous property ownership reaffirmed

our general knowledge that the site is located in an area of commercial and industrial activity that

occurred over the past 130 years. Situated between the Hocking River and the Lancaster Lateral

of the Ohio Canal during the last quarter of the nineteenth century, this canal-river corridor

(along what were then the western and southern edges of Lancaster) served as the city’s

industrial district. As previously mentioned in the Site Location section of this report, a review

of historic Sanborn® maps of the area indicate that the Hocking River once meandered through

the site, until the river was straightened and realigned to its present day position sometime

between April 1884 and June 1889. Subsequent Sanborn® maps (June 1889 through December

1899) for the area continue to depict the “old channel” as it crossed the site.

Because the site was a low-lying area, much of it resting in a floodplain, the historic

Sanborn® maps reflect that very little building took place at the current site through the latter

part of the nineteenth century (1884 through 1899) and first half of the twentieth century (1900

through 1949), with the exception of John Thimmes and Brothers’ slaughter house and pork

packing business (Figure 4). Historic Sanborn® maps (April 1884 through June 1919) depict the

expansion of the Thimmes Brothers meat packing business during this timeframe showing cattle

and straw sheds, cribs, scale houses, and several buildings erected for packing, smoking and

curing of meats, including a sausage factory. There are also a number of cold storage buildings

(including an ice house) shown in connection with the slaughter house and meat packing

operation. No other commercial operations at the Thimmes Brothers property are noted on the

maps.

/

Figure 4.Historic land use (1899)showing limitedsite developmentin floodplanexcept byThimmes Brothers.Sanborn® Fire Insurance Map(December1899)

11

According to The Biographical Record of Fairfield County, Ohio (Multiple

Authors,1902), John H. Thimmes took over the family’s butchering and meat market business

from his father, Mathias Thimmes, in 1877 and three years later entered into partnership with his

brothers under the firm name of Thimmes Brothers. The historic biographical record further

indicates that the members of the firm were engaged in the wholesale and retail shipping and

pork packing business, and were also proprietors of two meat markets in the city of Lancaster.

In addition, as extensive buyers and shippers of hogs and cattle at the time, the members of the

firm handled annually “…about thirty thousand hogs and a large number of export cattle, which

they bought and shipped to Baltimore, Maryland, their principal hogs markets being Pittsburg,

(sic) Pennsylvania and Chicago, Illinois.” Although some slaughterhouses also performed

tanning of hides, there is no indication that such activities were part of the Thimmes Brothers

business.

Subsequent to June 1919, historic (June 1919 to February 1929) Sanborn® maps of the

area show that the Thimmes Brothers meat packing operation changed names to “The Lancaster

Packing Co.,” which continued to operate at the site through the 1920s. This name change is

corroborated by the chain-of-title search (previously detailed) that shows the Thimmes Brothers

sold the property in September 1919, and that the property was eventually deeded to The

Lancaster Packing Company in November 1919. Later revisions (1933, 1945 and 1945

collectively) to the 1929 Sanborn® map show that after February 1929, remnant buildings from

the former meat packing operations at the site were converted for use as a foundry supply

warehouse. Based upon the results of the chain-of-title search, it is suspected that this land use

change followed The Lancaster Packing Company deeding the property to George H. Alten on

September 23, 1935. Having previously purchased the undeveloped portions of the site (i.e., the

6.78 acre property owned by Louis J. Snyder and Jacob Keller) in 1921, George H. Alten held

ownership of the entire site by 1936.

Further review of the historic Sanborn® maps for the area (1889 through 1929, including

revisions to the 1929 map in 1933, 1945 and 1949) show the development of Alten’s Foundry

and Machine Shop over the last quarter of the nineteenth century and the first half of the

twentieth century. Located east of both the study site and present day Memorial Drive/US Route

33 (formerly named Front Street) at 226 West Wheeling Street, Henry F. Alten began a

blacksmith and machine shop in 1889, the same year that his son George H. Alten was born. By

December 1904, the business was known as Alten’s Iron and Steel Works and included

blacksmith and foundry operations with an onsite cupola (the primary method used for melting

operations in foundries) (Figure 5).

Between December 1910 and June 1919, the operation expanded south across West Bank

Alley (which ran parallel between West Wheeling Street and West Main Street) with the foundry

and machine works including a castings, cleaning and machine shop, coke pile and flask (the

frame for a mold of sand) yard. It was during this same time period that Henry F. Alten died

(August 1911) and his son George H. Alten became involved in managing the family business.

Alten’s Foundry and Machine Shop continued its expansion of operations on the east side of

Front Street throughout the 1920s, 30s and 40s. In a November 15, 1947 article in Forbes

Site

Alten's Iron &Steel Works

/

Figure 5.Historic land use (1904)showing developmentand proximity ofAlten's Iron andSteel Worksto site.Sanborn® Fire Insurance Map(December1904)

13

Magazine, Alten’s Foundry and Machine Shop was mentioned as one of Lancaster’s significant

industries.

Although the principal foundry operations continued to be confined to the east side of

Front Street during this time span (as well as until the foundry ceased operation in July 1983),

George H. Alten had acquired the mostly undeveloped, low-lying area west of Front Street and

east of the rechanneled Hocking River that today comprises the study site. With the expanding

foundry business and the concomitant increase in foundry sand spoils from the casting

operations, it is logical to assume that the lower elevation, flood-prone area was purchased, in

part, with the intent to fill the site as a means of dealing with the foundry sand spoils (with the

added benefit of raising the property above the floodplain for future potential use). Indeed, by

1933, the Sanborn® maps show that Alten’s Foundry has expanded to occupy the southeast

corner of the intersection between West Wheeling Street and Memorial Drive and that “sand

bins” occupy that corner. Further, the 2012 Flood Map on the Fairfield County Auditor’s site

shows that, with the exception of one small area along the channelized Hocking River (in the

parking lot west of the current Sheriff’s office), the site was successfully raised above the 100-

year floodplain (Figure 6). According to the map, only the very western portion of the site

remains located in the floodway (a strip approximately 33 feet wide), primarily in the wooded

and bermed area adjacent to the current river channel.

While no specific written records were found to document filling at the site, historic

aerial photographs of the study site and surrounding area were obtained from the Fairfield

County Soil and Water Conservation District to assist in determining land use during the

timeframe between 1920 and 1950. The only archival aerial photograph available for the site

during this time span is dated 1938. An enlargement of that photograph is shown in Figure 7.

Despite the limitations of the image resolution, the remnant buildings (from the former meat

packing business) being used as a foundry supply warehouse can be seen on the southeast corner

of the study site, and the remainder of the undeveloped site shows various degrees of land

disturbance with several paths transecting the site, suggestive of a fill operation.

Insight into possible dates for filling operations may be gained from observations made

relative to adjacent properties as well. As mentioned before, Lancaster’s Miller Park Wellfield is

located immediately north (across West Wheeling Street) from the proposed Fairfield County

Jail/Public Safety Facility. As early as April 1884, the “Lancaster Water Power House” is shown

as being located on the northwest corner of Wheeling Street and the Ohio Canal (present-day

Memorial Drive) on Sanborn® maps included in Lancaster’s Potential Contaminant Source

Inventory (URS, 1993b). The Lancaster Water Treatment Plant is present on the 1938 aerial

photograph (Figure 7) and still occupies the same location 130 years later.

A memorial plaque located adjacent to a tree approximately fifty feet north of West

Wheeling Street (and across the street from the Fairfield County Sheriff’s office) in the Miller

Park Wellfield indicates that the tree was planted in honor of General William T. Sherman and

was presented by the Department of Ohio Woman’s Relief Corps in 1928 (Figures 1 and 8). The

Woman’s Relief Corps is an Order of the Sons of Veterans of the United States of America that

was originally open only to Union soldiers and their heirs, but later expanded to include all those

who wished to honor such soldiers. Similarly a second plaque adjacent to a tree approximately

Figure 6. 2012 delineation of 100-year floodplain (blue hachures) and floodway (red hachures) in the site vicinity (Fairfield County

Auditor’s site).

Lincoln Ave.

Memorial Dr. (Front St.)

West Wheeling St.

Hocking River

Lancaster Water Treatment Plant

Gas Station

AltenFoundry

remnant buildings

suspected filling activety

Lancaster Miller Park Well Field

/

Figure 7.1938 aerial photographof site showing remnant buildings(former meat packingoperation) used as foundry supplywarehouse and suspected fill activites(Fairfield CountySoil and WaterConservation District).

Figure 8. Looking south at the tree (and commemorative plaque) in Miller Park Wellfield planted in

honor of General Sherman in 1928. Note the proximity of the current Fairfield County Sheriff’s Office

in the background.

17

100 feet to the northwest, indicates that another tree (now dead) was planted in 1928 to honor

Kate Brownlee Sherwood, Past President of the Woman’s Relief Corps (Figures 1, 9 and 10).

The significant feature about the trees in the Miller Park Wellfield is that they are surrounded by

a rock enclosure with the trunks of the trees being exposed several feet below grade (Figure 11).

Presumably, the trees were planted and then the area was filled. In order to prevent the trees

from being “girdled” and killed when the tree trunk was covered by soil, the rock enclosures

were built and a “depression” was left around the tree trunks. This indicates that the filling on

the Miller Park Wellfield Property took place after 1928.

Evidence of filling in the southwest portion of the wellfield, where wells 4 and 16 are

located, is similarly evident today by the presence of a guard rail denoting a change in elevation

that transects the wellfield from east to west approximately 400 feet north of West Wheeling

Street and west of the road that leads to the swimming pool (Figures 1 and 12). Also, it is

expected that filling of the old Hocking River channel took place on the Miller Park property

similar to the filling on the proposed Fairfield County Jail site. The presence of fill materials in

borings and wells in the Miller Park Wellfield is documented on publically-available well logs as

early as 1944 and as late as 1979, ranging in depth from four to 25 feet.

The 1938 aerial photograph shows one other land use of interest. A building can be seen

at the southwest corner of West Wheeling Street and Memorial Drive (aka Front Street). Based

upon historic (revisions to the 1929 map in 1933, 1945 and 1949, collectively) Sanborn® maps

for the area, this structure is identified as a gas station. As previously noted, this is still the site

of a service station. Of interest is the shape of the parcel that forms the property of the service

station. Figure 1 shows the odd-shaped semi-circle that forms the western boundary of the

property. This semi-circle seems to correspond with the wide portion of the old Ohio Canal

shown in Figure 2, but the projection of the parcel map show that it is offset to the southwest.

Figure 5 shows that by 1904, the canal has been filled in, but the shape of the property seems still

to reflect the former presence of the wide portion of the canal.

Further historic land use of the proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility site

during the latter half of the twentieth century (1950 to 1999) was compiled based upon the chain-

of-title search, and a review of Phase I environmental site assessment reports, geotechnical

studies and sanitary surveys available for the parcels that comprise the study site. As previously

detailed in Section 2.2, Review of Previous Property Ownership, on July 8, 1954, George H.

Alten deeded a 2.4 acre tract of land in the northwest corner of the site (current property tax

parcel 0536001800) to Herbert Welsh and Harry Lemley who developed the site with a

commercial building that was leased to The Kroger Company for use as a grocery store.

Subsequent deeded transfers of the property to Brown Gold Realty on July 6, 1956, C. Hart

Manufacturing Company on January 16, 1961, and Anncor Company, Inc. on January 16, 1961

continue to acknowledge the lease agreement with The Kroger Company and the apparent

commercial use of the site as a grocery store until approximately1979. According to the Phase I

environmental site assessment report for the property (Beling Consultants, 1992), in 1980

American Electric Power (AEP) became a new tenant and remodeled the existing building for

use as administrative offices. AEP occupied the building until 1990 when they relocated into

their new offices on West Main Street and North Memorial Drive. The building remained

unoccupied until Anncor Company, Inc. deeded the property to the Fairfield Board of

Figure 9. Looking south at the dead tree in Miller Park Wellfield. The tree was originally

planted in 1928 by the Woman’s Relief Corps. Note the proximity of the current Fairfield

County Sheriff’s Office in the background.

Figure 10. Close-up of the Women’s Relief Corp plaque commemorating the planting of the tree.

Figure 11. Depression around the trunk of the General Sherman tree in the Miller Park Wellfield

showing the approximate original grade at the time of planting.

Figure 12. Guardrail in Miller Park Wellfield (on left) delineating a change in grade with Well 4 in the

center of the photograph.

Guardrail

Well #4

20

Commissioners on September 28, 1992 whereupon the building was remodeled for its current

use as a minimum security jail.

With regard to the remaining approximately 4.8 acre portion of the site (current property

tax parcels 0536801700 and 0536001700), this property remained deeded to George H. Alten,

subject to lease and mortgage agreements starting in July 1962. Based upon findings from the

Phase I environmental site assessment report (Lawhon and Associates, 1993), the site was

developed with a building that was used for retail and commercial purposes until the early 1980s

(Charley Horse Saloon) after which the building sat vacant for approximately ten years prior to

demolition in 1993. Our supplemental chain-of-title search for this property showed that

following George H. Alten’s death on October 13, 1970, The Huntington Trust Company, as

Trustee under The George H. Alten Trust, dated February 25, 1969, was appointed co-executor

of the estate on November 24, 1970 and Trustee of the 4.8 acre parcel listed as Tract No. 30 on

the Certificate for Transfer of Real Estate. The Huntington Trust Company remained the Trustee

of the parcel until deeded to the Fairfield County Board of Commissioners on March 5, 1993.

21

SECTION 3

SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION

3.1 Introduction

Based on our review of Phase 1 and geotechnical reports for the site, we developed a

preliminary understanding of the site. The following is a brief summary of the salient

information in the reports that focused our investigation.

The Phase 1 report for the current jail parcel (Beling Consultants, 1992) concluded that

“no environmental hazards were identified on the subject property”. Although no subsurface

investigation was conducted, it was noted during the site visit that borings had been placed

around the existing Charley Horse building (on the adjacent parcel). According to a telephone

conversation record in Appendix D of the report by Beling Consultants (1992), Glimsher

Company (a developer) had contracted the installation of borings, but no information on the

borings was made available by Glimsher (and we have not seen these borings).

The Environmental Assessment Report for the Charley Horse Property (Lawhon &

Associates, 1993) was performed when the vacant building was present on the property and

focused primarily on the environmental conditions within the building and review of

environmental databases. However, this report noted the presence of a Marathon Service Station

on the adjacent property with six underground tanks that were installed approximately two years

earlier. The report concluded that “There is currently no evidence to suggest that the existence

of USTs at this service station have adversely affected the subject property”. The report

contained no subsurface site-specific information.

The Wellhead Protection Plan for the City of Lancaster, Ohio Miller Park Wellfield

(URS, 1993a) provided general geologic and hydrogeologic data about the subsurface deposits

underlying the site. The report also contained a model of groundwater flow conditions indicating

that the site was modeled as an unconfined aquifer (having no confining layer between the

aquifer and the surface). This model was used to delineate the capture zone of the wells and to

identify one, two, three, four and five year time-of-travel zones to the wellfield. The site is

located (as expected) within the one-year time-of-travel to the wells. Although a location map of

wells in the wellfield by number was not available to us, a visual search for wells close to the site

was performed in the Miller Park Wellfield. Wells 4 and 16 are approximately 400 feet and 190

feet north of site, respectively (Figure 1). Two additional wells, located along Wheeling Street

(close to the water tower and maintenance building and inside the barbed wire fence), are closer

to the site and are approximately 60 and 95 feet north of the site (Figure 1). Although the

municipal wells are numbered, it was possible to discern only the first number of each well. The

well closest to the water tower is well 1_, while the well closest to the maintenance building is

well 2_.

The Preliminary Potential Contaminant Source Inventory for the City of Lancaster Miller

Park Wellfield (URS, 1993b) shows that the site is located within the one year time of travel for

the wellfield. This report also contained copies of Sanborn® maps for the years 1884, 1889,

22

1893, 1899, 1904, 1910, 1919, 1929 and 1929 revised in 1933, 1943 and 1949. Although the

report identified 47 potential pollution sources within the one-year time of travel and a total of

310 potential sources within the five year time of travel, neither current nor past site activities

were listed as a potential pollution source. The fill activities that took place on both the proposed

Fairfield County Jail site and on the southwest portion of the Miller Park Wellfield were not

mentioned in the report.

Although the information was not available to us at the time of project development, as a

follow-up to the potential pollution inventory, the City of Lancaster installed twelve (eight

shallow and four deep) groundwater monitoring wells within the five-year time-of-travel to

presumably monitor potential sources of contamination. Two monitoring wells, one shallow

(MW-4S) and one deep (MW-4D) were installed just north of the Fairfield County Maintenance

Garage on Parcel 0536801700 on September 29, 1995 and October 2, 1995, respectively (Figure

1). The well logs (ODNR Well log numbers 816585 and 816586, respectively) show five feet of

“Fill – Subase (sic) + Foundry Sand” was encountered at the surface. No special construction

or completion methods for these wells are noted in the logs. Once installed, these (and the other

ten groundwater monitoring wells) were sampled once each quarter for a year. According to

URS Greiner (1996) “No primary MCLs established by the OEPA were exceeded in any of the

samples” collected from any of the 12 monitoring wells.

On May 19, 1994, Beling Consultants reviewed what appears to be a geotechnical report

prepared by BBC&M Engineering, Inc. (Beling Consultants, 1994). The conclusions and

recommendations sections of the report were attached to Beling’s review. It appears as though at

least eight borings were drilled on the Charley Horse site in anticipation of a building addition

(although no borings or locations were available). According to the BBC&M report, “Seepage

was encountered during drilling at depths between 11.0 and 27.5 feet below the ground surface

in all Borings except B-11” and after drilling water levels ranged from 8.8 to 24.7 feet. The

report also noted a “noticeable sheen and a hydrocarbon odor” from 12 to 13.5 feet in boring B-

9 (location unknown) when water was encountered. The report concludes that “this site is

covered with up to 12.5 feet of fill which consists of both cohesive and granular soils mixed with

possible foundry sand, slag, brick fragments, glass, wire, wood and ash in varying proportions”.

Apparently two test pits were also excavated at the site as part of the BBC&M

investigation (Beling Consultants, 1994). In test pit 1 (location unknown), “a layer of dark-gray

fine to medium sand was encountered. It is possible that this material is foundry sand…[if] this

layer is removed from the ground, environmental regulations may require that this material be

disposed of in a landfill. An environmental analysis of this material is beyond the scope of this

project, however, it has been brought to our attention that the Environmental Protection Agency

prefers to classify foundry sand as a hazardous material”.

A geotechnical investigation was performed on the Charley Horse property in 1999 for

the Fairfield County Board of Commissioners relating to a proposed Juvenile Detention Center

(Solar, 1999). During this investigation, 14 borings were advanced from 10 to 60 feet, with a

concentration of deeper borings in the area of the existing concrete slab. Figure 13 shows the

locations of the borings. Similar to the BBC&M subsurface investigation, fill was encountered

in each of the borings at depths ranging from 6 to 18.5 feet below the surface. The fill was

Figure 13. Boring locations (Solar, 1999).

24

typically described as silty sand with glass, brick fragments, cinders, slag, shale and sandstone

fragments, and gravel. One boring encountered wood and rubber (B2) and another reported

metal and roofing material (B3). Water was encountered in five borings at depths of 10 to 13.5

feet (either slightly above or just at the fill/natural material interface. Similar to the BBC&M

investigation, two borings (B4 and B10) encountered water at 23.5 feet in the underlying sandy

organic silt and silty sand and gravel.

Solar (1999) identified “A preexisting marshy area evidenced by organic silt and clay

layers encountered in borings B1, B3, B4, B10, and B12”. Although Solar (1999) postulated that

“These deposits are probably largely resultant of decomposed vegetation and alluvial and

lacustrine deposits in former floodplains”, it is more likely that these borings are representative

of the former Hocking River trace before it was channelized (Figure 2). Similarly, descriptions

of materials immediately underlying the fill in borings B-6, B-8 (and in B-2 after one foot of

clay) indicate that the underlying deposits are “dirty” sands with gravels, as opposed to the silty

clays and organic deposits indicated on the rest of the site.

Also during this subsurface investigation, Solar (1999) screened all samples with a

photoionization detector (PID) in the field for the presence of volatile organic compounds

(VOCs) after allowing the sample to offgas in a jar for approximately 20 minutes. According to

the report, “One collected sample (Boring B2, S2, 3.5’ – 5.0’), within the fills produced an

elevated VOC reading”. All other samples produced no reading on the PID. The sample with a

field detection was sent for laboratory analysis by EPA Methods 8015A (for gasoline range

organics) and EPA Method 418.1, which measures Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH),

including heavier petroleum fractions. While the analysis for Method 8015A was below

detection limits, the analysis using Method 418.1 “showed a hydrocarbon content of 224

mg/kg”. The report concluded that “The analytical results of this sample may warrant further

investigations, dependant (sic) on the intended use of the site. Particularly if proposed fills are

to be removed from the site, further characterization may be warranted”.

In 2007, Shremshock Architects completed an analysis of four sites for potential location

of the new Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility. The current site was discussed as Site #2

in the document. Shremshock (2007) did not perform additional subsurface investigations, but,

rather, quoted the 1992 Phase 1 Environmental Report on the existing jail parcel (Beling

Consultants, 1992) and the BBC&M report reviewed by Beling Consultants(1994) for

environmental information. They concluded that “As the project’s design evolves,

environmental authorities may require some degree of onsite environmental work”.

In 2011, Geotechnical Consultants, Inc. performed subsurface geotechnical exploration

for preliminary design of foundations for a conceptual design of the Fairfield County Jail

presented by Wachtel & McAnally Architects (Geotechnical Consultants, Inc., 2011). During

the investigation, six borings were installed to depths of 25 or 30 feet “at or near the suggested

locations within the proposed structure footprint”. Figure 14 shows the outline of the proposed

structure, the location of the borings and an approximate location of the Hocking River prior to

channelization between 1884 and 1889 (Geotechnical Consultants, Inc., 2011).

26

Similar to previous subsurface investigations, Geotechnical Consultants, Inc. (2011)

encountered fill in all borings ranging from 9 to 17.5 feet below grade. The fill was

characterized as primarily “dark brown/black foundry sand...with varying but generally minor

amounts of slag, glass, and brick. Occasional zones of slightly plastic silty, clayey sand (SC-SM)

or low plasticity clayey sand (SC) were encountered within the fill”. Water seepage was noted in

all six borings. Four borings (B-1, B-2, B-3, and B-6) had water levels that were above the base

of the fill materials. Boring B-5 had a depth to water of 12.5 feet in the natural dark organic clay

layer immediately underlying the fill and B-4 had a water level of 16.5 feet in the underlying

natural sand formation.

With regard to materials immediately underlying the fill, Geotechnical Consultants, Inc.

(2011) found “natural cohesive soils, varying from non-organic to organic and from moderate to

high plasticity, immediately below the fill in the (sic) five of the six boring locations”. Boring B-

3 was underlain by brown silty clayey sand with gravel “below the deep fill cover at 17.5 feet

below the surface”. The report makes preliminary recommendations relative to foundations for

the proposed structure.

3.2 Investigation Design

The reports described in Section 3.1 indicated that the site was underlain by 6 to 18.5 feet

of variable fill material that reportedly contained, among other things, foundry sands, slag,

cinders, brick and glass. With the exception of one reported TPH concentration of 224 mg/kg at

a depth of 3.5-5.0 feet by Solar (1999), the chemical characteristics of the underlying fill

materials, relative to the presence of environmentally regulated substances were undocumented

to date. Further, zones of saturation had been encountered in the fill materials. Historical site

usage included operation of a slaughterhouse, filling by possible foundry sands and other

materials as well as the presence of an automotive service station at the southwest corner of West

Wheeling Street and Memorial Drive since at least 1938.

Utilizing the preliminary architectural drawings for the new Fairfield County Jail/Public

Safety Facility, an initial drilling program was proposed to include 10 soil borings beneath the

footprint of the proposed facility. Figure 15 shows the location of the proposed jail (red outline),

possible expansion area (green outline), and Sheriff’s Office (light pink outline on the west side

of the site) as well as the location of the originally-conceived 10 borings (BW-1 through BW-

10).

The soil borings were restricted in depth to the bottom of the fill materials that were in

contact with underlying native soils. The borings were to be used to characterize the depth and

stratigraphy of the fill materials, collect fill material samples for environmental analysis, and

visually observe the fill materials for the possible presence of hazardous substances and

petroleum products. The layout of the borings was designed to provide uniform spatial coverage

beneath the proposed building and roughly coincide with the architect’s pattern of proposed

geotechnical borings for foundation design. When a saturated zone of adequate thickness for

groundwater sampling was encountered, a temporary monitoring well was to be installed and

completed.

BW9 BW8

BW7

BW6

BW5BW4

BW3

BW2BW1

BW9ABW8A

BW7A

BW10BW10A

/0 50 100 15025

Feet

Figure 15.Sampling locationswith proposedbuilding footprint.

1 inch = 100 feet

28

Due to the unknown character of the fill, soil samples were proposed to be submitted to a

laboratory for analysis for a broad range of potential contaminants. No attempt was made to

limit the analytes based on potential land use or types of historic activities. A minimum of one

sample per boring was proposed to be analyzed for the following parameters based on soil

volume, field screening, and visual observations:

1) toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) for metals, volatile organic

compounds (VOCs) and semi-volatile organic compounds using EPA sample

extraction Method 1311 and analytical Methods 6010B/7470A/8260B/8260C;

2) total concentration of “target analyte list” metals using EPA analytical Methods

6010B/7471A;

3) total concentration of “target compound list” VOCs using EPA Methods 5035 and

5035A for sample collection, preservation, and handling in addition to EPA analytical

Method 8260B; and

4) total concentration of “target compound list” semi-volatile organics using EPA

analytical Method 8270C.

Soil samples from selected borings were also proposed to be submitted to the laboratory

if screening or observations indicated the presence of petroleum-contaminated soils. In this

instance, samples were proposed to be analyzed for both “gasoline range organics” (GROs) and

“diesel range organics” (DROs) using EPA analytical method 8015C in an attempt to

characterize the type of petroleum product encountered in the subsurface. Because known,

multiple types of petroleum products have been used and are currently used on contiguous

properties at the site, characterization of the petroleum hydrocarbons found in the ground was

contemplated.

Groundwater samples were also proposed to be collected when sufficient saturation for

the installation of a groundwater monitoring well was present. Each monitoring well was

proposed to be sampled for: the “target analyte list” of metals using EPA analytical Methods

6010B/7470B and the “target compound list” of VOCs using EPA Method 8260B.

3.3 Drilling and Soil Sampling

Prior to initiation of the subsurface investigation, ten preliminary boring locations were

identified within the footprint of the proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility. The

preliminary locations were provided to Fairfield County on March 14, 2014. On March 17,

2014, we met with representatives from Fairfield County to mark the locations in the field and to

discuss potential underground obstacles when drilling. Once the locations were marked, the

Ohio Utilities Protection Service (OUPS) was called. OUPS must be called at least 48 hours but

no more than 10 working days (excluding weekends and legal holidays) before digging. OUPS

informed us that their network did not include Lancaster sewer or storm lines and provided a

telephone number to call.

Jason Westfall, the Industrial Pretreatment Coordinator for the City of Lancaster,

requested a map of the preliminary boring locations, which was provided on March 18, 2014.

29

Mr. Westfall forwarded a map of underground water and sewer lines on the property, none of

which coincided with the proposed boring locations. Similarly, OUPS did not notify us of

potential underground lines at the proposed boring locations.

The initial subsurface investigation was conducted on March 20 and 21, 2014. Ten

borings (BW-1 through BW-10) were installed by Wrights Drilling using a CME 75 drilling rig

and 4 ¼ inch inside diameter hollow stem augers. At the time of drilling, the borings were

located using GPS technology. The location of the borings is shown on Figure 15. Appendix A

contains pictures of field activities for the project (Figure A-1 shows the drilling rig and set-up

for drilling). Continuous split spoon samples were collected in accordance with ASTM Standard

D1586 (Figure A-2). Blow counts were recorded for all intervals. All drilling cuttings were

containerized in 55-gallon drums meeting ODOT specification 17H. The drums of soil were

labeled with date and locations where the soil was collected (Figure A-3). A total of four drums

were used. All drums were placed on pallets and moved into the Fairfield County Maintenance

Garage by County personnel for safe storage until receipt of analytical results (Figure A-4).

(Based on the analytical results, the soil will be disposed at a solid waste disposal facility.)

Split spoon samplers were washed with Alconox detergent and rinsed between each

sample. At the end of each boring, the augers and pilot bit were cleaned by pressure washing

with a hot water pressure washer (Figure A-5). All water used to clean the equipment was

containerized and placed in 55-gallon drums meeting ODOT specification 17H. The drums of

water were labeled with date and source of the water (Figure A-6). A total of two drums were

used. The drums were placed on pallets (Figure A-4) and moved into the Fairfield County

Maintenance Garage by County personnel for safe storage pending receipt of analytical results

from monitoring well sampling. (Based on the analytical results, the water will be disposed at the

Fairfield County wastewater treatment plant.)

Upon retrieval and opening of the split spoon sampler, the soil was field-screened using a

MiniRAE300 photoionization detector (PID) with an 11.7 volt lamp (Figure A-7). The detector

was passed slowly over the core and the reading was recorded in a field book. Selected intervals

(based on visual observations) in each boring were chosen for jar-headspace screening wherein a

sample was placed in a glass jar, the opening covered with aluminum foil, and stored in a heated

box for at least 20 minutes. The headspace was then screened using the PID.

Once the sample had been field screened with the PID, measurements of sample recovery

were made, and the sample was logged in a field notebook by a geologist (Figure A-8).

Appendix B contains the boring logs. Soil samples were concomitantly collected for laboratory

analysis. Due to soil sample volume limitations (e.g. the number of jars that needed to be filled

for analysis), soil samples were collected at different intervals in each boring for different

analytes. An effort was made to select different intervals for different analytes in borings, where

other observations did not dictate analyte selection. Table 1 shows the locations, intervals, and

analytes analyzed. Soil samples for analysis of “target compound list” VOCs were collected

using a Terra Core Sampler, which is designed to prevent loss of volatile compounds and

transferred to glass vials provided by the laboratory (Figures A-9 and A-10). All other samples

were collected by placing soil directly into glass jars provided by the laboratory (Figure A-11).

All samples were collected while wearing nitrile gloves, which were changed between samples.

Table 1. Location and depth (in feet below ground) of analytes in soil samples

BW-1 BW-2 BW-3 BW-4 BW-5 BW-6 BW-7 BW-7A BW-8 BW-8A BW-9 BW-9A BW-10 BW-10A

TCLP RCRA Metals 6-10 1-2, 4-8 2-6 2-6, 6-8 2-5, 6-9 4-6, 6-8 4-6, 6-8 .5-2, 2-4 4-8 0-2, 4-6

TCLP Mercury 6-10 1-2, 4-8 2-6 2-6, 6-8 2-5, 6-9 4-6, 6-8 4-6, 6-8 .5-2, 2-4 4-8 0-2, 4-6

TCLP Semivolatiles 6-10 1-2, 4-8 2-6 2-6, 6-8 2-5, 6-9 6-8 4-6, 6-8 .5-2, 2-4 4-8 0-2, 4-6

TCLP Volatiles 6-8 6-8 6-7.5 0.5-2 4-6 6-8 4-6 2-4 0-2 2-4

TAL ICP Metals 4-6, 10-12 2-4 1.5-2, 2-4 2-4, 8-10 1-2, 10-11 1-2, 4-6 2-4, 6-8 4-6, 6-8 2-4 2-4

TAL Metals Mercury 4-6, 10-12 2-4 1.5-2, 2-4 2-4, 8-10 1-2, 10-11 1-2, 4-6 2-4, 6-8 4-6, 6-8 2-4 2-4

TCL VOCs 4-6 2-4 2-4 2-4 4-6 1-2 2-4* 2-4 4-6* 4-6 0-2* 0-2 2-4* 2-4

TCL SVOCs 4-6, 10-12 2-4 1.5-2, 2-4 2-4, 8-10 1-2, 10-11 1-2, 4-6 2-4, 6-8 4-6, 6-8 2-4 2-4

GRO (C-6 to C-10) 8-9 6-8

DRO (C-10-C-28) 8-9 6-8

*Holding time compromised in sample. Re-collected in companion boring.

31

Samples were placed in a cooler with ice. At the end of each day, chain-of-custody forms

were completed, the coolers were sealed, and the samples were shipped via Federal Express to

Test America in North Canton, Ohio for next-day delivery. Because the second day of drilling

was on a Friday, these samples were shipped for Saturday delivery to the laboratory due to short

laboratory holding times for the “target compound list” VOC samples.

Borings were terminated in native materials at the bottom of the fill. Borings ranged in

depth from 8 feet (BW-3 and BW-10) to 14 feet (BW-6). Fill depths ranged from 7.5 feet (BW-

3) to 11 feet (BW-1). Table 2 shows the depth of fill, depth of the borings, depth to water during

drilling and a description of the materials immediately underlying the fill. Appendix B contains

logs for the borings.

In general, our investigation confirmed the presence of and characteristics of fill

materials that had been previously described by Solar (1999) and Geotechnical Consultants, Inc.,

(2011). The fill consisted primarily of foundry sand with occasional brick fragments, glass

pieces, coal, wood pieces, shale, limestone and sandstone fragments, slag, metal (wire), and

ceramic tile. Although there had been some anecdotal information about possible burial of

“trash” or “garbage” at the site, neither our investigation nor other previous subsurface

investigations indicated that such materials were found.

Our investigation similarly corroborated the types of materials immediately underlying

the fill. Similar to descriptions by Solar (1999) and Geotechnical Consultants, Inc. (2011),

materials within what appeared to be the former Hocking River channel were wetter and had a

higher organic content. Materials encountered within what was probably the floodplain area

consisted primarily of sandy, silty clays and clayey silts. Materials that were primarily further to

the east were characterized by silty and clayey sands (with or without gravel). Table 2 presents

the materials found to be immediately underlying the fill in the borings drilled as part of this

investigation.

Where water was not encountered during drilling (BW-2, BW-3, BW-5, BW-6, BW-7,

BW-8, BW-9, and BW-10), the borings were abandoned by mixing a slurry of bentonite and

emplacing it by pumping (Figure A-12). Borings were filled to approximately one foot below

grade (Figure A-13). Quickrete was mixed by hand and placed in the top of the boring (Figure

A-14).

Water was encountered during drilling in two borings (BW-1 and BW-4). During

drilling, there was approximately 1.5 feet of water in the bottom of the fill in BW-1 (10 feet

below grade) and wet at the interface between the fill and underlying clayey silt in B-4 (10 feet

below grade). Once again, our investigation confirmed the findings of previous investigations

with regard to the occasional presence of water within the fill materials, primarily at the interface

with the underlying in-situ deposits.

Temporary monitoring wells were completed in both borings (B-1 and B-4) by installing

2-inch PVC casing with five feet of 10-slot screen surrounded by a #4 Parry filter pack (Figure

A-15). The filter pack was extended two feet above the screen in monitoring well B-1. Due to

Table 2. Summary of encountered subsurface conditions.

Borehole Surface Layer

Depth of Fill

(feet)

Bottom of

Boring Depth

(feet)

Depth to Water

During Drilling

(feet )

Depth to Water in

Monitoring Well

(feet) Materials Under Fill

BW-1 Concrete 11 12 10 9.5 Damp, grayish brown organic SILT

BW-2 Asphalt 9 10 None Moist, brown SAND

BW-3 Asphalt 7.5 8 None Damp to moist, brown CLAYEY SILT

BW-4 Concrete 10 12 10 10 Moist to wet, dark gray CLAYEY SILT

BW-5 Concrete 10 12 None Damp to moist, gray CLAYEY SILT

BW-6 Asphalt 8 14 None Damp, gray SILT (2 feet), then brown SAND

BW-7 Asphalt 7.8 10 None

Damp to moist, light gray mottled with yellowish

brown SILTY CLAY

BW-8 Asphalt 8.5 10 None Damp to moist, dark gray CLAYEY SILT

BW-9 Asphalt 8.2 10 None Damp, brown CLAYEY SILT

BW-10 Asphalt 7.75 8 None Moist, brown CLAYEY SILT

33

vertical depth limitations, the filter pack was only extended one foot above the filter pack in

monitoring well B-4. The remaining annular space in both temporary monitoring wells was

filled with 3/8-inch Holeplug. The wells were completed at the surface with flush-mount

protectors with an inside locking cap (Figures A-16 and A-17). Appendix C contains the

completion diagrams for the temporary monitoring wells and the drillers logs submitted to the

Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR).

On Monday, March 24, 2014, we were notified by Test America that the soil samples that

had been shipped on Friday (for Saturday delivery) had not been delivered until Monday. The

laboratory informed us that while the temperature of the cooler had remained below 4oC,

analysis of the “target compound list” VOC samples would be outside the laboratory method

holding time. This affected the “target compound list” VOC samples from BW-7, BW-8, BW-9

and BW-10 only. Subsequent checking with Federal Express showed that the delivery person

had simply made a mistake and had missed the “Saturday delivery” notation. A decision was

made to analyze the “target compound list” VOC samples, but also to re-collect the samples for

“target compound list” VOCs.

On March 31, 2014, Wrights Drilling rig, a CME-75, was re-mobilized to the site.

Because no monitoring wells were to be installed, 2 ¼-inch inside diameter hollow stem augers

were used to drill the borings. Borings BW-7A, BW-8A, BW-9A, and BW-10A were each

drilled one foot west of the previous boring locations (Figure 15). In order to re-collect the

“target compound list” VOC samples that had been delivered late to the laboratory, it was

decided to drill without sampling to the top of the desired sampling interval. A split spoon

sample was then collected from the previously-sampled interval. Blow counts were recorded,

recovery was measured, and the sample was logged (Appendix B). A Terra Core Sampler was

used to collect samples and place them in glass bottles received from the laboratory. Samples

were collected from 0 to 2 feet (BW-9A), 2 to 4 feet (BW-7A and BW-10A), and 4 to 6 feet

(BW-8A). The samples were placed on ice, the chain-of-custody was prepared, the cooler was

sealed, and the samples were taken to Federal Express for shipment to Test America, North

Canton, Ohio.

As before, all split spoon samplers were washed between samples with Alconox and

rinsed. The augers and pilot bit were cleaned with a high pressure washer between borings. All

wash water was contained and placed in a separate 55 gallon drum meeting ODOT specification

17H. The drum was labeled with the date and the source of the water. Similarly, all drill

cuttings were containerized in a separate 55 gallon drum meeting ODOT specification 17H. The

drum was labeled with the boring numbers and the date. One new drum for water and one new

drum for soil were used during this field mobilization. The two drums were moved into the

Fairfield County Maintenance Garage by County personnel for safe storage pending receipt of

analytical results. (Based on the analytical results, the soil will be disposed at a solid waste

disposal facility).

Due to the shallowness of the borings, all borings were abandoned by filling with 3/8-

inch Holeplug to within six inches of the surface. The remainder of the borehole was filled with

Quickrete to be even with the surrounding asphalt.

34

3.4 Groundwater Sampling

As mentioned previously, two monitoring wells were installed in the only locations

where water was encountered during drilling (BW-1 and BW-4). The monitoring wells were

allowed to equilibrate for 10 days prior to sample collection. No attempt was made to develop

the wells due to the minimal amount of water in the wells and the high fines content in the

surrounding fill.

Sampling was conducted on March 31, 2014. Prior to sampling, the water level was

measured in each monitoring well with a Solinst Model 101 electric measuring tape (Figure A-

18). The water level was approximately 9.5 feet below the ground surface in BW-1 and almost

10 feet below grade in BW-4. While monitoring well BW-1 had 1.63 feet of water, monitoring

well BW-4 had only .5 feet. The monitoring wells were purged using disposable polyethylene

bailers that were gently lowered into the water column to minimize turbidity. Despite best

efforts to minimize turbidity, the water quickly became black due to the fines in the adjacent fill

(Figure A-19). A minimum of three times the volume of water in the well was removed prior to

sample collection. All water was containerized and added to the wash water drum that had been

used earlier in the day for drilling activities (Figure A-20). (Based on the analytical results, the

water will be disposed at the Fairfield County wastewater treatment plant.)

Samples were collected using disposable polyethylene bailers that were gently lowered

into the water column. Field parameters of pH, temperature, and conductivity were measured in

the field prior to sample collection with an Oakton PC-10. Measurements of pH indicated that

the groundwater was neutral, while temperature was approximately 55o F (a typical temperature

for groundwater year-round). During purging, the water had become black with fines and

turbidity was excessive. An attempt was made to measure turbidity with a Hach 2100P Turbidity

Meter, but an error reading indicated that the turbidity was in excess of 1000 NTUs. While

volatile samples are not affected by the presence of turbidity, “Purging and sampling in a

manner that produces low-turbidity water is particularly important when analyzing for total

metals, which may exhibit artificially elevated concentrations in high-turbidity samples (Gibbons

and Sara, 1993). When sampling for contaminants or parameters that may be biased by

turbidity, Ohio EPA recommends stabilizing the turbidity readings below 10 NTUs (Yeskis and

Zavala, 2002)” (Ohio EPA, 2012).

In these temporary wells, it was not possible to stabilize the turbidity. Therefore, an

alternate strategy was employed to collect representative samples. Samples were collected for

both total metals and dissolved metals. Dissolved metals samples were collected by passing the

sample through a 0.45 micron filter (thus, reducing the turbidity) prior to placing the sample in a

bottle preserved with nitric acid (Figure A-21). Total metals samples were collected without

filtration and with excessive turbidity. All samples were collected wearing latex gloves that

were changed between samples.

It should be noted that BW-4 was sampled first. After purging and collection of samples

for volatiles and total metals, the well was dry. Monitoring well BW-1 was sampled while

monitoring well BW-4 was allowed to recharge. After sampling was completed at BW-1,

enough water had recharged in BW-4 to collect samples for dissolved metals.

35

Samples were placed in bottles provided by the laboratory. A trip blank for VOCs was

included in the cooler when it arrived from the laboratory and was returned to the laboratory for

anlaysis. Samples were placed on ice, a chain-of-custody was prepared, the cooler was sealed,

and delivered to Federal Express for next day receipt at Test America in North Canton, Ohio.

Soil samples from borings BW-7A, BW-8A, BW-9A, and BW-10A were shipped in the same

cooler.

3.5 Temporary Monitoring Well Abandonment

On May 29, 2014, Wrights Drilling was mobilized to abandon the two temporary

monitoring wells, BW-1 and BW-4. The wells were abandoned by pulling the casing and screen

from the well with a CME-75 drilling rig (Figures A-22 and A-23). The void was filled with

Type I/II Portland cement by pouring from the surface (due to the minimal amount of water in

the void). The flush-mounted protector was left in place because it would have been necessary

to disturb a larger surface area of the parking lot (Figure A-24). The top 8 to 12 inches was filled

with Quickrete that was mixed by hand and finished to be level with the surrounding concrete

pad (Figure A-25). No soil or water was generated during the process. Appendix D contains the

Water Well Sealing Reports filed with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) by

Wrights Drilling.

36

SECTION 4

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

4.1 Introduction

The scope of work of this project was to conduct an initial subsurface environmental

sampling and analysis program to develop information about the chemical characteristics of the

existing fill materials underlying the proposed footprint of the new Fairfield County Jail/Public

Safety Facility. Specifically, the objective of the investigation was to evaluate these fill

materials for the possible presence of hazardous substances that would warrant the need for

environmental management of the material during future site redevelopment. In addition, the

scope included collection of representative groundwater samples from existing saturated zones

within the fill materials for the possible presence of hazardous substances. At issue was the need

to environmentally characterize these materials so as to exercise due care with respect to any

future excavation or other disturbance of the fill materials during construction activities. Further,

the environmental characterization of the fill materials necessitates a high degree of confidence

in that the site of the proposed new Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility is located

immediately adjacent to and within the designated wellhead protection area for Lancaster’s

Miller Park Wellfield.

As previously described, soil samples were collected for:

1) toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) for metals, volatile organic

compounds (VOCs) and semi-volatile organic compounds using EPA sample

extraction Method 1311 and analytical Methods 6010B/7470A/8260B/8260C;

2) total concentration of “target analyte list” metals using EPA analytical Methods

6010B/7471A;

3) total concentration of “target compound list” VOCs using EPA Methods 5035 and

5035A for sample collection, preservation, and handling in addition to EPA analytical

Method 8260B;

4) total concentration of “target compound list” semi-volatile organics using EPA

analytical Method 8270C; and

5) both “gasoline range organics” (GROs) and “diesel range organics” (DROs) using

EPA analytical method 8015C.

Groundwater samples were analyzed for:

1) total concentration of the “target analyte list” metals using EPA analytical Methods

6010B/7470B;

37

2) dissolved concentrations of “target analyte list” metals using EPA analytical Methods

6010B/7470B; and

3) the “target compound list” of VOCs using EPA Method 8260B.

The following sections present the analytical results, the regulatory framework under

which the results were interpreted, and the implications for future site development, soil use and

disposition.

4.2 Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure in Soils (TCLP)

4.2.1 Introduction

At the time the investigation was begun, the source and chemical characteristics of the fill

materials were not known to us. Therefore, the investigation was designed to characterize and

eliminate classifications of waste, as possible. Hazardous waste is considered the “worst” kind

of waste and has the most restrictive handling and disposal requirements. Therefore, tests were

performed to determine if hazardous wastes were present at the site.

Hazardous wastes are regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

(RCRA) and regulated by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA), Division of

Material and Waste Management. Wastes are considered hazardous by two different criteria:

definition and characteristics. Hazardous wastes that are hazardous by definition are included

into lists published by the Agency (OAC 3745-51-30 to 3745-51-35) and are organized into

categories, the F-list, the K-list, and the P-list and U-list. The F-list identifies wastes from

common manufacturing and industrial processes and is known as the “non-specific source

wastes” list. The K-list includes certain wastes from specific industries and is known as the

“source-specific waste” list. The P-list and U-list include specific commercial chemical products

and is known as the “discarded commercial chemical product” list. Because the fill materials

(foundry sand) are not listed wastes, this category was eliminated.

Wastes can also be hazardous when the waste exhibits one or more of the characteristics

of ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity (OAC 3745-51-20 to 3745-51-24). According

to OAC 3745-51-21(A)(2), a solid is considered ignitable if the material under standard

temperature and pressure is capable of “causing fire through friction, adsorption of moisture or

spontaneous chemical changes and, when ignited, burns so vigorously and persistently that it

creates a hazard”. According to OAC 3745-51-22, the characteristic of corrosivity is exhibited

only by liquids with a pH lower than 2 or higher than 12 or when the liquid corrodes steel “at a

rate greater than 6.35 mm (0.250 inch) per year”. According to OAC 3745-51-23(A), a

material exhibits reactivity when:

“(1) It is normally unstable and readily undergoes violent change without detonating.

(2) It reacts violently with water.

(3) It forms potentially explosive mixtures with water.

38

(4) When mixed with water, it generates toxic gases, vapors or fumes in a quantity

sufficient to present a danger to human health or the environment.

(5) It is a cyanide or sulfide bearing waste which, when exposed to pH conditions

between two and 12.5, can generate toxic gases, vapors or fumes in a quantity sufficient

to present a danger to human health or the environment.

(6) It is capable of detonation or explosive reaction if it is subjected to a strong initiating

source or if heated under confinement.

(7) It is readily capable of detonation or explosive decomposition or reaction at standard

temperature and pressure.”

Based on the definitions and characteristics of the observed fill materials, these

characteristics were determined not to be exhibited.

The remaining characteristic, toxicity by leaching potential, however, requires testing

using the TCLP, Method 1311, to determine an extract concentration and comparison of that

concentration to values in Table 1 of OAC 3745-51-24 to confirm the absence or presence of

constituents above the listed values.

4.2.2 TCLP Metals Results

Seventeen samples were collected from ten borings for the eight RCRA metals, arsenic,

barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver. Samples were collected in the

fill from intervals ranging from the ground surface to 10 feet below the surface. Samples were

extracted using Method 1311 and analyzed by Methods 6010B and/or 7470A. Table 3 shows the

analytical results, boring and depth from which the sample was collected, as well as the TCLP

regulatory levels from Table 1 of OAC 3745-51-24. Appendices E, F, G and H contain the

laboratory results. The results show that only two constituents, cadmium and lead, were detected

above the reporting limit and that all eight RCRA metals were below the prescribed regulatory

levels.

4.2.3 TCLP Volatile Organic Compounds Results

One sample was collected from each of the ten borings for the ten regulated volatile

organic compounds (VOCs). Samples were collected from intervals ranging from the ground

surface to 8 feet below the ground surface. Samples were extracted using Method 1311 and

analyzed by Method 8260B. Table 4 shows the analytical results, boring and depth from which

the sample was collected, as well as TCLP regulatory levels from Table 1 of OAC 3745-51-24.

Appendices E, F, G and H contain the laboratory results. The results show that no VOCs were

detected above the laboratory reporting limit and, therefore well below prescribed regulatory

levels.

Table 3. Analytical results for TCLP of RCRA metals

WELL NUMBER BW1 BW2 BW2 BW3 BW4 BW4 BW5 BW5 BW6 BW6 BW7 BW7 BW8 BW8 BW9 BW10 BW10 TCLP

Depth 6-10 Ft 1-2 Ft 4-8 Ft 2-6 Ft 2-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 2-5 Ft 6-9 Ft 4-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 4-6 Ft. 6-8 Ft 0.5-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 4-8 Ft 0-2 Ft 4-6 Ft Regulatory

Sample Date 03/20/201403/20/201403/20/201403/20/201403/20/201403/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 Levels

PARAMETER mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L

Arsenic TCLP 0.017 J 0.0098 J 0.0095 J 0.0045 J 0.0065 J 0.0096 J 0.0078 J 0.012 J 0.0053J 0.0047 J 0.0044 J 0.0057 J 0.0033 J 0.0056 J 0.0043 J 0.0043 J 0.0046 J 5

Barium TCLP 1.1 J B 0.99 J B 1.0 J B 1.5 J B 0.41 J B 0.87 J B 1.3 J B 1.2 J B 0.22 J B 0.53 J B 0.85 J B 0.38 J B 0.66 J B 0.98 J B 0.63 J B 0.25 J B 0.18 J B 100

Cadmium TCLP 0.0074 J 0.54 0.0093 J 0.46 0.027 J 0.043 J 0.035 J 0.16 0.0075J 0.0020 J 0.014 J 0.0018J 0.024 J 0.015 J 0.0047 J 0.0027 J 0.0012 J 1

Chromium TCLP 0.0062 J 0.0043 J 0.0041 J 0.0033 J 0.0031 J 0.0034 J 0.0042 J 0.0067 J 0.0030 J 0.0026 J 0.0092 J <0.50 0.0040 J 0.0075 J 0.0053 J 0.0045 J 0.010 J 5

Lead TCLP 0.74 0.030 J 0.13 J 0.029 J 0.0024 J 0.12 J 2.8 0.71 <0.50 <0.50 2.2 0.0047 J 0.011 J 0.075 J 0.15 J <0.50 0.0064 J 5

Mercury TCLP <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 0.2

Selenium TCLP 0.0058 J 0.0099 J 0.0046 J 0.0050 J 0.0063 J 0.0053 J 0.0085 J 0.0081 J 0.0064 J 0.0069 J 0.0074 J B 0.0049 J B 0.0084 J B 0.0045 J B <0.25 0.0062 J B 0.0043 J B 1

Silver TCLP <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 5

Detection greater than Reporting Limit

Concentration between Reporting Limit and Method Detection Limit

Table 4. Analytical results for TCLP VOCs.

WELL NUMBER BW1 BW2 BW3 BW4 BW5 BW6 BW7 BW8 BW9 BW10 TCLP

Depth 6-8 Ft 6-8 Ft 6-7.5 Ft 0.5-2 Ft 4-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 4-6 Ft 2-4 Ft 0-2 Ft 2-4 Ft Regulatory

Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 Levels

PARAMETER mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L

1,1-Dichloroethene TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 0.7

1,2-Dichloroethane TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 0.5

2-Butanone (MEK) TCLP <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 200

Benzene TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 0.5

Carbon tetrachloride TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 0.5

Chlorobenzene TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 100

Chloroform TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 6

Tetrachloroethene TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 0.7

Trichloroethene TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 0.5Vinyl chloride TCLP <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 0.2

41

4.2.4 TCLP Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds Results

Sixteen samples were collected from ten borings for the twelve regulated semi-volatile

organic compounds (SVOCs). Samples were collected from intervals ranging from the ground

surface to 10 feet below the ground surface. Samples were extracted using Method 1311 and

analyzed by Method 8270C. Table 5 shows the analytical results, boring and depth from which

the sample was collected, as well as TCLP regulatory levels from Table 1 of OAC 3745-51-24.

Appendices E, F, G and H contain the laboratory results. The results show that no SVOCs were

detected above the laboratory reporting limit and, therefore, were below prescribed regulatory

levels.

4.2.5 TCLP Summary

Based on the analytical results for TCLP analyses of all regulated metals, VOCs and

SVOCs, only two metals, cadmium and lead were detected above the laboratory reporting limit.

However, no regulated compounds were detected above the regulatory limits set for designation

of materials as hazardous waste in Table 1 of OAC 3745-51-24. Therefore, the fill materials at

the site are not considered to be hazardous wastes. Subsequent discussions with representatives

of Ohio EPA confirmed the conclusion.

4.3 Characterization of Soils by Other Methods of Analysis

4.3.1 Introduction

As mentioned above, at the time the investigation was begun, the source and chemical

characteristics of the fill materials were not known to us. Therefore, in addition to performing

analyses that would determine if the fill materials need to be handled as hazardous waste (which

they do not), samples for total concentrations of the “target analyte list” of metals and total

concentrations of the “target compound lists” for VOCs and SVOCs were also collected. In

addition, selected samples were collected and analyzed for gasoline range organics (GRO) and

diesel range organics (DRO) due to the proximity of the automotive service station. The purpose

in collecting these samples was to characterize the fill materials so as to be able to exercise due

care with respect to any future excavation or other disturbance of the fill materials during

construction activities.

As a preliminary indication of the magnitude of the concentrations of the individual

metals, VOCs, and SVOCs, the results were compared to soil standards found in OAC 3745-300-

08. Although this chapter of the Ohio Administrative Code, known as the Voluntary Action

Program (VAP), applies specifically to voluntary clean-up of sites, the generic standards

contained in the rules are often used to evaluate potential risks posed by concentrations of

constituents. The Appendix to OAC 3745-300-08 contains generic numerical standards for

hazardous substances and petroleum for complete exposure pathways for, among others, direct

contact with hazardous substances in soil. Of particular application to this site were values for

construction/excavation activities because of proposed construction activities at the site.

WELL NUMBER BW1 BW2 BW2 BW3 BW4 BW4 BW5 BW5 BW6 BW6 BW7 BW7 BW8 BW8 BW9 BW10 BW10 TCLP

Depth 6-10 Ft 1-2 Ft 4-8 Ft 2-6 Ft 2-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 2-5 Ft 6-9 Ft 4-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 4-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 0.5-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 4-8 Ft 0-2 Ft 4-6 Ft Regulatory

Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 Levels

PARAMETER mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L

1,4-Dichlorobenzene TCLP <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 7.5

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol TCLP <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 400

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol TCLP <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 2

2,4-Dinitrotoluene TCLP <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 0.13

2-Methylphenol TCLP <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 200

3 & 4 Methylphenol TCLP <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 400

Hexachlorobenzene TCLP <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 0.13

Hexachlorobutadiene TCLP <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 0.5

Hexachloroethane TCLP <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 3

Nitrobenzene TCLP <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 <0.0040 2

Pentachlorophenol TCLP <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 100

Pyridine TCLP <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 5

Table 5. Analytical results for TCLP SVOCs.

43

The Appendix to OAC 3745-300-08 contains calculations of standards for both non-

carcinogenic and carcinogenic effects (if applicable) of a particular constituent of concern. The

generic direct contact soil standard for a single chemical is then presented based on the lower

value of the two calculations and/or other factors as determined by Ohio EPA. In this evaluation,

generic direct contact soil standards for construction/excavation activities were referenced for

both the current regulations (effective March 2009) and the generic direct contact soil standards

for construction/excavation activities that have been adopted, but will not be effective until

August 1, 2014. The most conservative (lowest) number for each chemical from both of the

rules was used for comparison.

Although somewhat less applicable, generic direct contact soil standards for residential

use were also reviewed as a conservative estimate of potential chemicals of concern. Generic

direct contact soil standards for residential use assume that an individual will live at the site for

thirty years (6 years as a child and 24 years as an adult) and that the exposure will be 24 hours

per day. Further, the assumption is made that the individual will have direct contact with the soil

during this time period. In fact, according to Fairfield County personnel, the residents at the jail

spend an average of 14 days at the facility, even though misdemeanor sentences under ORC

2929.24 can add to 360 days. Apparently, if there is a felony 5 charge (which is rare in Fairfield

County), the time at the facility could exceed a year, depending on multiple factors, with the

longest recent duration resulting in a residence time of 18 months. Therefore, a residence time of

one year is conservative. Further, the proposed site design shows that the fill materials on site

will be either covered by a building or paved for a parking lot. Therefore, there will be no

contact with the soils. Again, this scenario was evaluated as a very conservative approach to

compare soil constituents that were potentially a concern.

Finally, also less applicable, generic direct contact soil standards for

commercial/industrial activities were also reviewed as another conservative estimate of potential

chemicals of concern. Generic direct contact soil standards for commercial/industrial land use

assume that a worker will be employed at the site for 25 years and that the exposure will be for 8

hours a day. The assumption is once again made that the individual will have direct contact with

the soil during this time period. As mentioned before, the proposed site design shows that the fill

materials on site will be either covered by a building or paved for a parking lot. Therefore, there

will be no contact with the soils. Again, this scenario was evaluated as a very conservative

approach to compare soil constituents that were potentially a concern.

The assumption when using these generic direct contact soil standards as a comparison is

that exposure to multiple chemicals may be greater than exposure to just one chemical.

Therefore, depending on the magnitude of the values, if there is a potential risk in a complete

exposure pathway, multiple chemical exposure adjustments may be necessary.

In addition to analyses for metals, VOCs, and SVOCs, selected soil samples were also

analyzed for gasoline range organics (GRO) and diesel range organics (DRO). Although it was

envisioned that these samples would be collected based primarily on field headspace screening

and to evaluate potential contamination from the service station on the adjacent property, the

field headspace screening produced minimal results and the sample volume of soil in the split

44

spoon sampler was very limited after the other samples were collected. In addition, many of the

constituents in DRO are included in the VOC and SVOC analyses, which better define the

individual constituents.

With regard to standards for petroleum, according to Ohio EPA (2005a), “OEPA’s

Voluntary Action Program (VAP) has developed cleanup standards based on land use and

ground water use for various hazardous substances and petroleum… However, Paragraph

(B)(1) of n3746.04 of the Ohio Revised Code (ORC) requires that the petroleum standards for

residential and commercial properties be the standards adopted under Division (B) of 3737.882

of the ORC, the standards developed by BUSTR and described in Chapter 1301:7-9-13 of the

Ohio Administrative Codes (OAC). The VAP developed direct contact soil standards for

petroleum releases at industrial properties”.

The Ohio EPA, Division of Remedial Response (DERR) has developed a guidance

document relating to petroleum releases from a non-BUSTR (Bureau of Underground Storage

Tank, State Fire Marshall’s Office) regulated source (Ohio EPA, 2005a). This document

presents a tiered approach to address petroleum contamination in soils. Petroleum action levels

are established based on Categories 1 through 4, which are loosely based on a scoring system of

vulnerability to contamination. Category 1 is the most vulnerable area, while Category 4 is the

least likely to be affected. The guidance contains “petroleum action levels” for soil TPH (total

petroleum hydrocarbons) (C-6 through C-10, also known as GRO) and soil TPH (Others) (C-10

through C-28, also known as DRO). Analytical results were compared to these guidance levels

to determine magnitude of concentrations and potential for regulation under DERR.

4.3.2 Total Metals Results in Soil

Seventeen samples were collected from ten borings for the 23 metals in the “target

analyte list”. Samples were collected in the fill from intervals ranging from 1.5 to 12 feet below

the ground surface. Samples were analyzed by Methods 6010B and/or 7471A. Table 6 shows

the analytical results, boring and depth from which the sample was collected, as well as the VAP

generic direct contact soil standard for a single chemical for construction/excavation activities

from the Appendix of OAC 3745-300-08 (both March 2009 and August 1, 2014). Note that the

generic direct contact soil standard for chromium is for chromium VI (the most toxic form of

chromium), even though the value for chromium represents total chromium. Appendices E, F, G

and H contain the laboratory results. The results show that three constituents: arsenic, lead, and

mercury exceed the generic direct contact soil standards for construction/excavation activities.

When results are compared to generic direct contact soil standards for residential use, the

results show that six constituents: antimony, arsenic chromium, copper, lead, and mercury are

exceeded in at least one interval in at least one boring (Table 7). Similarly, when results are

compared to generic direct contact soil standards for commercial/industrial use, the results show

that four constituents: arsenic, chromium, lead and mercury are exceeded in at least one interval

in at least one boring (Table 8).

BORING NUMBER BW1 BW1 BW2 BW3 BW3 BW4 BW4 BW5 BW5 BW6 BW6 BW7 BW7 BW8 BW8 BW9 BW10

Depth 4-6 Ft 10-12 Ft 2-4 Ft 1.5-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 8-10 Ft 1-2 Ft 10-11 Ft 1-2 Ft 4-6 Ft 2-4 Ft 6-8 Ft 4-6 Ft 6-8 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft

Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014

PARAMETER mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

Aluminum 7500 5800 5700 2600 6500 4500 6800 4000 11000 4700 4600 5700 4500 5600 5300 6100 1400 None None

Antimony 43 11 14 1.3 0.74 J 0.78 J <6.0 0.69 J 0.97 J <1.0 0.51 J 0.39 J 0.41 J 5.9 1.2 0.58 J <0.82 390 850

Arsenic 18 94 22 7.0 12 8.8 36 11 34 3.6 6.8 7.1 9.2 460 23 12 1.9 420 690

Barium 450 3300 500 27 68 B 61 920 32 220 22 27 57 B 44 B 170 B 160 B 120 B 11 J B 120,000 None

Beryllium 0.68 0.56 J 0.34 J 0.11 J 0.46 J 0.21 J 2.0 0.27 J 0.80 J 0.17 J 0.25 J 0.26 J 0.37 J 0.43 J 0.39 J 0.62 0.058 J 3,100 3,400

Cadmium 1.4 6.4 6.8 0.39 0.43 0.25 2.6 0.53 6.5 0.16 J 1.9 0.41 0.33 4.1 3.3 1.3 0.062 J 1,600 1,000

Calcium 58000 60000 57000 7800 15000 4700 21000 36000 19000 2600 28000 5800 9100 12000 7900 10000 1400 None None

Chromium 37 330 81 35 16 34 60 19 120 8.9 19 26 22 23 20 15 8.6 13,000 1,200

Cobalt 6.2 6.7 J 4.6 J 2.5 J 4.7 J 4.1 J 12 5.2 11 2.6 J 3.3 J 3.4 J 4.1 J 8.1 6.8 6.8 1.4 J 4,000 None

Copper 62 300 2300 61 36 58 360 40 77 10 21 96 74 56 41 31 8.7 None 21,000

Iron 24000 95000 45000 19000 22000 30000 150000 22000 91000 9900 15000 22000 28000 31000 22000 20000 8100 None None

Lead 1100 2000 1600 18 41 32 1400 25 260 9.2 14 44 55 260 230 150 5.9 750 400

Magnesium 7800 13000 9200 3100 4800 640 3100 11000 3700 970 6300 1600 3000 3500 2700 3200 510 None None

Manganese 470 860 680 170 400 620 790 370 760 150 220 450 380 440 380 560 91 None None

Mercury 0.29 57 8 0.044J 0.080 J <0.10 6.2 0.051 J 1.1 <0.12 0.017J 0.069 J 0.15 0.60 0.54 0.25 0.035 J 190 3.1

Nickel 24 34 14 25 27 37 56 44 36 7.7 14 34 37 26 28 43 10 21,000 23,000

Potassium 920 850 J 770 320 J 720 B 440 J 470 J 730 1700 650 660 530 B 490 J B 810 B 740 B 790 B 150 J B None None

Selenium 0.71 5.5 2.3 0.49 <0.51 0.54 2.3 <0.47 4.7 1.4 0.83 0.62 0.85 9.4 4.6 0.73 <0.41 9,700 11,000

Silver 1.0 3.7 0.23 J <0.45 <0.51 <0.47 <0.60 <0.47 0.96 J <0.50 <0.40 <0.45 <0.51 0.63 0.66 0.17 J <0.41 9,700 11,000

Sodium 510 J 960 J 190 J 130 J 290 J 94 J 180 J 77 J 210 J 350 J 490 810 610 110 J 81 J 210 J 100 J None None

Thallium <1.2 1.5 J <0.96 <0.90 <1.0 <0.93 1.6 <0.93 1.2 J <1.0 <0.80 <0.91 <1.0 <1.2 <0.87 <0.95 <0.82 1,600 None

Vanadium 20 24 19 8.5 17 14 23J 14 30 12 15 10 10 18 13 16 4.6 17,000 None

Zinc 390 4500 1300 26 92 46 1000 71 700 19 34 100 66 500 300 150 11 580,000 640,000



Concentration greater than VAP construction/excavation activities value for direct-contact with a single chemical (either March 2009 or August 1, 2014 values)

VAP standards contained in OAC 3745-300-08

* Chromium VAP Direct Contact Concentrations provided for Chromium VI

B = Method blank contamination

VAP

Construction/

Excavation

Generic Direct-

Contact Soil

Standard for a

Single Chemical

(Efffective

August 1, 2014)

VAP

Construction/

Excavation

Generic Direct-

Contact Soil

Standard for a

Single Chemical

(Efffective March

2009)

Table 6. Analytical results for metals in soils compared to VAP generic direct contact soil values for construction/excavation activities.



Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014



Antimony 43 11 14 1.3 0.74 J 0.78 J <6.0 0.69 J 0.97 J <1.0 0.51 J 0.39 J 0.41 J 5.9 1.2 0.58 J <0.82 30 63

Arsenic 18 94 22 7.0 12 8.8 36 11 34 3.6 6.8 7.1 9.2 460 23 12 1.9 6.7 12


Beryllium 0.68 0.56 J 0.34 J 0.11 J 0.46 J 0.21 J 2.0 0.27 J 0.80 J 0.17 J 0.25 J 0.26 J 0.37 J 0.43 J 0.39 J 0.62 0.058 J 150 310

Cadmium 1.4 6.4 6.8 0.39 0.43 0.25 2.6 0.53 6.5 0.16 J 1.9 0.41 0.33 4.1 3.3 1.3 0.062 J 72 140


Chromium 37 330 81 35 16 34 60 19 120 8.9 19 26 22 23 20 15 8.6 230* 24


Copper 62 300 2300 61 36 58 360 40 77 10 21 96 74 56 41 31 8.7 None 6

Iron 24000 95000 45000 19000 22000 30000 150000 22000 91000 9900 15000 22000 28000 31000 22000 20000 8100 None None

Lead 1100 2000 1600 18 41 32 1400 25 260 9.2 14 44 55 260 230 150 5.9 400 400



Mercury 0.29 57 8 0.044J 0.080 J <0.10 6.2 0.051 J 1.1 <0.12 0.017J 0.069 J 0.15 0.60 0.54 0.25 0.035 J 7.6 3.1

Nickel 24 34 14 25 27 37 56 44 36 7.7 14 34 37 26 28 43 10 1,500 3,100


Selenium 0.71 5.5 2.3 0.49 <0.51 0.54 2.3 <0.47 4.7 1.4 0.83 0.62 0.85 9.4 4.6 0.73 <0.41 380 780

Silver 1.0 3.7 0.23 J <0.45 <0.51 <0.47 <0.60 <0.47 0.96 J <0.50 <0.40 <0.45 <0.51 0.63 0.66 0.17 J <0.41 380 780


Thallium <1.2 1.5 J <0.96 <0.90 <1.0 <0.93 1.6 <0.93 1.2 J <1.0 <0.80 <0.91 <1.0 <1.2 <0.87 <0.95 <0.82 6.1 None

Vanadium 20 24 19 8.5 17 14 23J 14 30 12 15 10 10 18 13 16 4.6 680 None

Zinc 390 4500 1300 26 92 46 1000 71 700 19 34 100 66 500 300 150 11 23,000 47,000



Concentration greater than VAP residential exposure value for direct-contact with a single chemical (either March 2009 or August 1, 2014 values)




VAP Residential

Generic Direct-

Contact Soil

Standard for a

Single Chemical

(Efffective

August 1, 2014)

VAP Residential

Generic Direct-

Contact Soil

Standard for a

Single Chemical

(Effective March

2009)

Table 7. Analytical results for metals in soils compared to VAP generic direct contact soil values for residential exposure .



Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014



Antimony 43 11 14 1.3 0.74 J 0.78 J <6.0 0.69 J 0.97 J <1.0 0.51 J 0.39 J 0.41 J 5.9 1.2 0.58 J <0.82 1,200 1,600

Arsenic 18 94 22 7.0 12 8.8 36 11 34 3.6 6.8 7.1 9.2 460 23 12 1.9 82 77


Beryllium 0.68 0.56 J 0.34 J 0.11 J 0.46 J 0.21 J 2.0 0.27 J 0.80 J 0.17 J 0.25 J 0.26 J 0.37 J 0.43 J 0.39 J 0.62 0.058 J 5,100 7,800

Cadmium 1.4 6.4 6.8 0.39 0.43 0.25 2.6 0.53 6.5 0.16 J 1.9 0.41 0.33 4.1 3.3 1.3 0.062 J 2,300 2,600


Chromium 37 330 81 35 16 34 60 19 120 8.9 19 26 22 23 20 15 8.6 7,900* 210*


Copper 62 300 2300 61 36 58 360 40 77 10 21 96 74 56 41 31 8.7 None 160,000

Iron 24000 95000 45000 19000 22000 30000 150000 22000 91000 9900 15000 22000 28000 31000 22000 20000 8100 None None

Lead 1100 2000 1600 18 41 32 1400 25 260 9.2 14 44 55 260 230 150 5.9 None 800



Mercury 0.29 57 8 0.044J 0.080 J <0.10 6.2 0.051 J 1.1 <0.12 0.017J 0.069 J 0.15 0.60 0.54 0.25 0.035 J 290 3.1

Nickel 24 34 14 25 27 37 56 44 36 7.7 14 34 37 26 28 43 10 44,000 74,000


Selenium 0.71 5.5 2.3 0.49 <0.51 0.54 2.3 <0.47 4.7 1.4 0.83 0.62 0.85 9.4 4.6 0.73 <0.41 15,000 20,000

Silver 1.0 3.7 0.23 J <0.45 <0.51 <0.47 <0.60 <0.47 0.96 J <0.50 <0.40 <0.45 <0.51 0.63 0.66 0.17 J <0.41 15,000 20,000


Thallium <1.2 1.5 J <0.96 <0.90 <1.0 <0.93 1.6 <0.93 1.2 J <1.0 <0.80 <0.91 <1.0 <1.2 <0.87 <0.95 <0.82 230 None

Vanadium 20 24 19 8.5 17 14 23J 14 30 12 15 10 10 18 13 16 4.6 26,000 None

Zinc 390 4500 1300 26 92 46 1000 71 700 19 34 100 66 500 300 150 11 880,000 1,000,000



Concentration greater than VAP commercial/industrial exposure value for direct-contact with a single chemical (either March 2009 or August 1, 2014 values)




VAP

Commercial/I

ndustrial

Generic

Direct-

Contact Soil

Standard for

a Single

Chemical

(Efffective

August 1,

2014)

VAP

Commercial/

Industrial

Generic

Direct-

Contact Soil

Standard for

a Single

Chemical

(Effective

March 2009)

Table 8. Analytical results for metals in soils compared to VAP generic direct contact soil values for commercial/industrial exposure .

48

4.3.3 Total VOC Results in Soil

One sample was collected from each of the ten borings for the 48 VOCs in the “target

compound list”. Samples were collected from intervals ranging from the ground surface to 12

feet below the ground surface. Samples were analyzed by Method 8260B. Due to an oversight

by Federal Express, the samples collected on March 21, 2014 from borings BW-7, BW-8, BW-9

and BW-10 were delivered to the laboratory late and were past the method holding time. These

samples were analyzed, but additional samples were re-taken at the same intervals in companion

borings BW-7A, BW-8A, BW-9A and BW-10A on March 31, 2014. Therefore, a total of 14

samples were analyzed.

Table 9 shows the 48 VOCs in the “target compound list” that were analyzed. Table 10

shows the analytical results only for those VOCs that were detected. Boring number and depth

from which the sample was collected, as well as the generic direct contact soil values for a single

chemical for construction/excavation, residential, and commercial/industrial activities from the

Appendix of OAC 3745-300-08 (both March 2009 and August 1, 2014) are also shown on Table

10. Appendices E, F, G, H, and I contain the laboratory results. The results show that no VOCs

were detected above the laboratory reporting limit, thus no generic direct soil contact values

were exceeded. The table shows data from the four samples which were analyzed outside the

holding time and the re-collected samples that were analyzed within the method holding time.

The results are comparable.

4.3.4 Total SVOC Results in Soil

Seventeen samples were collected in the ten borings for the 65 SVOCs in the “target

compound list” (Table 11). Samples were collected in the fill from intervals ranging from 1.5 to

12 feet below the ground surface. Samples were analyzed by Method 8270C. Table 11 shows

the 65 SVOCs in the “target compound list” that were analyzed. Table 12 shows the analytical

results, boring and depth from which the sample was collected, as well as the VAP generic direct

contact soil standard for a single chemical for construction/excavation activities from the

Appendix of OAC 3745-300-08 (both March 2009 and August 1, 2014). Appendices E, F, G and

H contain the laboratory results. The results show that only one constituent, benzo[a]pyrene

exceeded the generic direct contact soil standards for construction/excavation activities in one

boring.

When results are compared to generic direct contact soil standards for residential use, the

results show that six constituents: benz[a]anthracene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene,

benzo[k]fluoranthene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene, and indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene are exceeded in at

least one interval in at least one boring (Table 13). Similarly, when results are compared to

generic direct contact soil standards for commercial/industrial use, the results show that five of

the same constituents: benz[a]anthracene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene,

dibenz(a,h)anthracene, and indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene are exceeded in at least one interval in one

boring (Table 14).

Table 9. “Target compound list” of VOCs analyzed in soil.

1,1,1-Trichloroethane Acetone Ethylbenzene

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Benzene Ethylene Dibromide

1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-

trifluoroethane

Bromoform Isopropylbenzene

1,1,2-Trichloroethane Bromomethane Methyl acetate

1,1-Dichloroethane Carbon disulfide Methyl tert-butyl ether

1,1-Dichloroethene Carbon tetrachloride Methylcyclohexane

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Chlorobenzene Methylene Chloride

1,2-Dibromo-3-

Chloropropane

Chlorodibromomethane Styrene

1,2-Dichlorobenzene Chloroethane Tetrachloroethene

1,2-Dichloroethane Chloroform Toluene

1,2-Dichloropropane Chloromethane trans-1,2-Dichloroethene

1,3-Dichlorobenzene cis-1,2-Dichloroethene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Trichloroethene

2-Butanone (MEK) Cyclohexane Trichlorofluoromethane

2-Hexanone Dichlorobromomethane Vinyl chloride

4-Methyl-2-pentanone

(MIBK)

Dichlorodifluoromethane Xylenes, Total

BORING NUMBER BW1 BW2 BW3 BW4 BW6 BW6 BW7 BW7A BW8 BW8A BW9 BW9A BW10 BW10A

Depth 10-12 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 4-6 Ft 1-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 4-6 Ft 4-6 Ft 0-2 Ft 0-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft

Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/31/2014 3/21/2014 3/31/2014 3/21/2014 3/31/2014 3/21/2014 3/31/2014

PARAMETER mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0037 0.00017 J B 0.00027 J B <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0025 None 400 None 150 None 400

2-Butanone (MEK) 0.0014 J <0.011 <0.015 <0.013 <0.0097 <0.014 0.00085 J H <0.010 <0.014 <0.0093 <0.011 <0.012 <0.013 <0.010 15,000 28,000 37,000 28,000 100,000 28,000

Acetone 0.0057 J <0.011 <0.015 <0.013 0.0095 J <0.014 <0.011 <0.010 <0.014 <0.0093 <0.011 0.0070 J <0.013 <0.010 100,000 110,000 64,000 110,000 100,000 110,000

Isopropylbenzene <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0037 0.00060 J <0.0024 <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0025 None None 260 None 260 None

Methyl acetate 0.0014 J <0.0057 <0.0073 <0.0064 <0.0048 <0.0069 <0.0057 <0.0051 <0.0069 <0.0046 <0.0055 <0.0060 <0.0066 <0.0051 None None None None None None

Methylene Chloride <0.0035 0.00053 J <0.0037 <0.0032 <0.0024 <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 0.00041 J <0.0033 <0.0025 1,500 3,300 250 750 570 3,300

Styrene <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0037 <0.0032 0.000093 J <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0025 1,700 870 1,700 870 1,700 870

Toluene <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0037 0.00021 J <0.0024 <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0025 520 820 520 820 520 820




Table 10. Analytical results for VOCs detected in soil compared to VAP generic direct contact soil values construction/excavation, residential, and commercial/industrial exposures.

VAP

Construction/

Excavation

Generic Direct

Contact Soil

Standard for a

Single

Chemical

(Effective

March 2009)

VAP

Commercial/

IndustrialGe

neric Direct

Contact Soil

Standard for

a Single

Chemical

(Effective

August 1,

2014)

VAP

Commercial/I

ndustrial

Generic

Direct

Contact Soil

Standard for

a Single

Chemical

(Effective

March 2009)

VAP

Construction/

Excavation

Generic Direct

Contact Soil

Standard for a

Single

Chemical

(Effective

August 1,

2014)

VAP

Residential

Generic Direct

Contact Soil

Standard for a

Single

Chemical

(Effective

March 2009)

VAP

Residential

Generic Direct

Contact Soil

Standard for a

Single

Chemical

(Effective

August 1,

2014)

Table 11. “Target compound list” of SVOCs analyzed in soil.

1,1'-Biphenyl 4-Nitroaniline Dibenzofuran

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Diethyl phthalate

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol Acenaphthene Dimethyl phthalate

2,4-Dichlorophenol Acenaphthylene Di-n-butyl phthalate

2,4-Dimethylphenol Acetophenone Di-n-octyl phthalate

2,4-Dinitrophenol Anthracene Fluoranthene

2,4-Dinitrotoluene Atrazine Fluorene

2,6-Dinitrotoluene Benzaldehyde Hexachlorobenzene

2-Chloronaphthalene Benzo[a]anthracene Hexachlorobutadiene

2-Chlorophenol Benzo[a]pyrene Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

2-Methylnaphthalene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Hexachloroethane

2-Methylphenol Benzo[g,h,i]perylene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene

2-Nitroaniline Benzo[k]fluoranthene Isophorone

2-Nitrophenol bis (2-chloroisopropyl)

ether

Naphthalene

3 & 4 Methylphenol Bis(2-

chloroethoxy)methane

Nitrobenzene

3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine

3-Nitroaniline Bis(2-ethylhexyl)

phthalate

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine

4,6-Dinitro-2-

methylphenol

Butyl benzyl phthalate Pentachlorophenol

4-Bromophenyl phenyl

ether

Caprolactam Phenanthrene

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol Carbazole Phenol

4-Chloroaniline Chrysene Pyrene

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl

ether

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene Dibenzofuran



Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014


1,1'-Biphenyl <0.250 <53 0.016 J 0.0093 J 0.0066 J 0.040 J <0.330 0.033 J <0.57 <0.056 0.0067 J 0.036 J 0.049 J 0.016 J 0.023 J 0.013 J 0.025 J None 190,000

2-Methylnaphthalene 0.033 3.7 J 0.047 0.045 0.038 0.19 0.1 0.091 0.096 0.028 0.033 0.12 0.55 0.09 0.13 0.057 0.12 None 5,200

Acenaphthene <0.033 19 0.12 0.024 0.021 0.043 0.1 0.039 0.055 J <0.0074 0.012 0.4 0.19 0.073 0.089 0.093 0.029 440,000 780,000

Acenaphthylene <0.033 75 0.057 <0.0072 0.0044 J <0.018 0.032 J 0.015 <0.076 <0.0074 <0.0073 0.016 0.024 0.036 0.039 0.013 <0.030 None None

Acetophenone <0.49 <110 <0.29 <0.11 <0.12 0.028 J <0.66 <0.22 <1.1 <0.11 <0.11 0.027 J 0.088 J <0.24 <0.3 0.012 J <0.450 850,000 2,500

Anthracene 0.027 J 170 0.3 0.017 0.014 0.063 0.21 0.084 0.3 <0.0074 0.021 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.18 0.047 0.09 1,000,000 1,000,000

Benzaldehyde 0.0240 J <110 0.063 J <0.11 <0.12 <0.27 0.19 J <0.22 <1.1 <0.11 <0.11 0.036 J 0.076 J 0.038 J <0.3 0.024 J <0.45 None None

Benz[a]anthracene 0.15 420 1 0.2 0.15 0.87 1.8 0.62 6.1 0.034 0.13 0.81 0.69 0.98 1.1 0.43 0.91 680 1,200

Benzo[a]pyrene 0.46 370 1 0.32 0.25 1.6 3.2 0.97 5.4 0.33 0.2 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.5 0.81 2.2 69 120

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.41 420 1.4 0.58 0.37 2.5 3.9 1.6 5 0.57 0.33 1.9 2.1 1.7 2.7 1.3 3.4 690 1,200

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.5 200 0.65 0.39 0.3 2.4 3 1.4 4.2 1.1 0.23 1.7 0.51 1.2 0.6 0.41 1.1 None None

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.087 180 0.49 0.17 0.14 0.76 1.6 0.48 0.92 0.15 0.082 0.74 0.54 0.66 0.61 0.32 0.93 6,900 12,000

Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate <0.340 <75 <0.2 0.035 J B <0.083 <0.19 <0.47 <0.15 <0.8 0.027 J B 0.1 B 0.043 J 0.063 J B <0.17 0.064 J B 0.04 J B <0.31 190 71,000

Carbazole <0.25 <53 0.098 J <0.054 <0.059 <0.13 <0.33 <0.11 <0.57 <0.056 <0.055 <0.11 <0.11 0.11 J 0.12 J <0.057 <0.22 30,000 None

Chrysene 0.19 380 1.1 0.27 0.21 1.2 1.9 0.76 9.5 0.65 0.18 0.99 0.79 1.1 1.3 0.48 1.1 69,000 120,000

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.33 59 0.18 0.095 0.064 0.54 0.72 0.3 3.6 0.24 0.06 0.38 0.14 0.27 0.17 0.1 0.24 69 120

Dibenzofuran <0.25 27 J 0.071 J 0.017 J 0.013 J 0.066 J 0.061 J 0.037 J 0.050 J 0.016 J 0.012 J 0.084 J 0.14 0.039 J 0.065 J 0.026 J 0.044 J None None

Di-n-butyl phthalate <0.34 <75 <0.2 <0.075 <0.083 <0.19 <0.47 <0.15 <0.8 <0.078 20.01 J <0.16 <0.16 <0.17 <0.21 0.035 J B <0.31 110 None

Fluoranthene 0.2 980 2 0.22 0.18 0.79 1.7 0.8 1.7 0.016 0.22 0.82 0.75 1.6 1.8 0.48 0.94 290,000 160,000

Fluorene <0.033 67 0.1 0.0064 J 0.0061 J 0.021 0.056 0.021 0.1 <0.0074 <0.0073 0.08 0.056 0.039 0.057 0.017 0.043 290,000 520,000

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.26 180 0.53 0.29 0.22 1.7 2.4 1 2.2 0.78 0.16 1.2 0.44 0.91 0.51 0.33 0.85 690 1,200

Naphthalene <0.033 13 0.08 0.033 0.024 0.13 0.1 0.086 0.19 0.017 0.022 0.13 0.37 0.083 0.15 0.048 0.094 84 560

Pentachlorophenol <0.74 <160 <0.44 <0.16 <0.18 <0.4 0.3 J <0.33 <1.7 <0.17 <0.17 <0.34 <0.33 <0.36 <0.45 <0.17 <0.67 460 950

Phenanthrene 0.1 570 1.3 0.11 0.086 0.4 0.8 0.4 1.2 0.03 0.12 0.51 0.63 0.7 0.93 0.24 0.43 None None

Pyrene 0.16 800 1.8 0.19 0.18 0.73 1.6 0.69 2.3 0.014 0.19 0.87 0.81 1.5 1.8 0.47 1 220,000 390,000



Concentration greater than VAP construction/excavation activities value for direct-contact with a single chemical (either March 2009 or August 1, 2014)


VAP standards contained in 3745-300-08


VAP

Construction/

Excavation

Generic

Direct-

Contact Soil

Standard for

a Single

Chemical

(Effective

March 2009)

VAP

Construction/

Excavation

Generic

Direct-

Contact Soil

Standard for a

Single

Chemical

(Effective

August 1,

2014)

Table 12. Analytical results for SVOCs detected in soil compared to VAP generic contact soil values for construction/excavation activities.



Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014



2-Methylnaphthalene 0.033 3.7 J 0.047 0.045 0.038 0.19 0.1 0.091 0.096 0.028 0.033 0.12 0.55 0.09 0.13 0.057 0.12 None 460

Acenaphthene <0.033 19 0.12 0.024 0.021 0.043 0.1 0.039 0.055 J <0.0074 0.012 0.4 0.19 0.073 0.089 0.093 0.029 3,500 6,900



Anthracene 0.027 J 170 0.3 0.017 0.014 0.063 0.21 0.084 0.3 <0.0074 0.021 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.18 0.047 0.09 18,000 34,000


Benz[a]anthracene 0.15 420 1 0.2 0.15 0.87 1.8 0.62 6.1 0.034 0.13 0.81 0.69 0.98 1.1 0.43 0.91 11 12

Benzo[a]pyrene 0.46 370 1 0.32 0.25 1.6 3.2 0.97 5.4 0.33 0.2 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.5 0.81 2.2 1.1 1.2

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.41 420 1.4 0.58 0.37 2.5 3.9 1.6 5 0.57 0.33 1.9 2.1 1.7 2.7 1.3 3.4 11 12


Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.087 180 0.49 0.17 0.14 0.76 1.6 0.48 0.92 0.15 0.082 0.74 0.54 0.66 0.61 0.32 0.93 110 120

Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate <0.340 <75 <0.2 0.035 J B <0.083 <0.19 <0.47 <0.15 <0.8 0.027 J B 0.1 B 0.043 J 0.063 J B <0.17 0.064 J B 0.04 J B <0.31 190 690

Carbazole <0.25 <53 0.098 J <0.054 <0.059 <0.13 <0.33 <0.11 <0.57 <0.056 <0.055 <0.11 <0.11 0.11 J 0.12 J <0.057 <0.22 430 None

Chrysene 0.19 380 1.1 0.27 0.21 1.2 1.9 0.76 9.5 0.65 0.18 0.99 0.79 1.1 1.3 0.48 1.1 1,100 1,200

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.33 59 0.18 0.095 0.064 0.54 0.72 0.3 3.6 0.24 0.06 0.38 0.14 0.27 0.17 0.1 0.24 1.1 1.2



Fluoranthene 0.2 980 2 0.22 0.18 0.79 1.7 0.8 1.7 0.016 0.22 0.82 0.75 1.6 1.8 0.48 0.94 2,400 4,600

Fluorene <0.033 67 0.1 0.0064 J 0.0061 J 0.021 0.056 0.021 0.1 <0.0074 <0.0073 0.08 0.056 0.039 0.057 0.017 0.043 2,400 4,600

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.26 180 0.53 0.29 0.22 1.7 2.4 1 2.2 0.78 0.16 1.2 0.44 0.91 0.51 0.33 0.85 11 12

Naphthalene <0.033 13 0.08 0.033 0.024 0.13 0.1 0.086 0.19 0.017 0.022 0.13 0.37 0.083 0.15 0.048 0.094 69 90



Pyrene 0.16 800 1.8 0.19 0.18 0.73 1.6 0.69 2.3 0.014 0.19 0.87 0.81 1.5 1.8 0.47 1 1,800 3,400



Concentration greater than VAP residential exposure value for direct-contact with a single chemical (either March 2009 or August 1, 2014 values)




VAP

Residential

Generic

Direct-

Contact Soil

Standard for

a Single

Chemical

(Effective

March 2009)

VAP

Residential

Generic

Direct-

Contact Soil

Standard for a

Single

Chemical

(Effective

August 1,

2014)

Table 13. Analytical results for SVOCs detected in soil compared to VAP generic contact soil values for residential exposure.



Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014



2-Methylnaphthalene 0.033 3.7 J 0.047 0.045 0.038 0.19 0.1 0.091 0.096 0.028 0.033 0.12 0.55 0.09 0.13 0.057 0.12 360 6,000

Acenaphthene <0.033 19 0.12 0.024 0.021 0.043 0.1 0.039 0.055 J <0.0074 0.012 0.4 0.19 0.073 0.089 0.093 0.029 56,000 90,000



Anthracene 0.027 J 170 0.3 0.017 0.014 0.063 0.21 0.084 0.3 <0.0074 0.021 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.18 0.047 0.09 280,000 450,000


Benz[a]anthracene 0.15 420 1 0.2 0.15 0.87 1.8 0.62 6.1 0.034 0.13 0.81 0.69 0.98 1.1 0.43 0.91 76 58

Benzo[a]pyrene 0.46 370 1 0.32 0.25 1.6 3.2 0.97 5.4 0.33 0.2 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.5 0.81 2.2 7.7 5.8

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.41 420 1.4 0.58 0.37 2.5 3.9 1.6 5 0.57 0.33 1.9 2.1 1.7 2.7 1.3 3.4 77 58


Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.087 180 0.49 0.17 0.14 0.76 1.6 0.48 0.92 0.15 0.082 0.74 0.54 0.66 0.61 0.32 0.93 770 580

Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate <0.340 <75 <0.2 0.035 J B <0.083 <0.19 <0.47 <0.15 <0.8 0.027 J B 0.1 B 0.043 J 0.063 J B <0.17 0.064 J B 0.04 J B <0.31 190 3,500

Carbazole <0.25 <53 0.098 J <0.054 <0.059 <0.13 <0.33 <0.11 <0.57 <0.056 <0.055 <0.11 <0.11 0.11 J 0.12 J <0.057 <0.22 3,400 None

Chrysene 0.19 380 1.1 0.27 0.21 1.2 1.9 0.76 9.5 0.65 0.18 0.99 0.79 1.1 1.3 0.48 1.1 7,600 5,800

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.33 59 0.18 0.095 0.064 0.54 0.72 0.3 3.6 0.24 0.06 0.38 0.14 0.27 0.17 0.1 0.24 7.7 5.8



Fluoranthene 0.2 980 2 0.22 0.18 0.79 1.7 0.8 1.7 0.016 0.22 0.82 0.75 1.6 1.8 0.48 0.94 37,000 60,000

Fluorene <0.033 67 0.1 0.0064 J 0.0061 J 0.021 0.056 0.021 0.1 <0.0074 <0.0073 0.08 0.056 0.039 0.057 0.017 0.043 37,000 60,000

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.26 180 0.53 0.29 0.22 1.7 2.4 1 2.2 0.78 0.16 1.2 0.44 0.91 0.51 0.33 0.85 77 58

Naphthalene <0.033 13 0.08 0.033 0.024 0.13 0.1 0.086 0.19 0.017 0.022 0.13 0.37 0.083 0.15 0.048 0.094 150 450



Pyrene 0.16 800 1.8 0.19 0.18 0.73 1.6 0.69 2.3 0.014 0.19 0.87 0.81 1.5 1.8 0.47 1 28,000 45,000



Concentration greater than VAP commerecial/industrial exposure value for direct-contact with a single chemical (either March 2009 or August 1, 2014)




VAP

Commercial/

Industrial

Generic

Direct-

Contact Soil

Standard for

a Single

Chemical

(Effective

March 2009)

VAP

Commercial/

Industrial

Generic

Direct-

Contact Soil

Standard for

a Single

Chemical

(Effective

August 1,

2014)

Table 14. Analytical results for SVOCs detected in soil compared to VAP generic contact soil values for commercial/industrial exposure.

55

4.3.5 GRO and DRO Results in Soil

Two samples were collected for GRO (C-6 to C-10) and DRO (C-10-C-28) from two

separate borings. Samples were collected from the fill from depths of 6 to 8 and 8 to 9 feet

below the ground surface. Samples were analyzed by Method 8015C. Table 15 shows the

analytical results, boring and depth from which the sample was collected, as well as the Ohio

EPA DERR petroleum action level for Category 1 (the most vulnerable category). Soil TPH

(GRO) petroleum action levels range from 105 ppm (Category 1) to 600 ppm (Category 4) (Ohio

EPA, 2005a). Soil TPH (DRO) petroleum action levels range from 380 ppm (Category 1) to

1156 ppm (Category 4) (Ohio EPA, 2005a). Appendices E and H contain the laboratory results.

The results show that no DERR petroleum action levels were exceeded.

Table 15. Analytical results for gasoline range organics (GRO) and diesel range

organics (GRO) in soil.

BORING NUMBER BW2 BW10 DERR

Petroleum

Action Levels

Depth 8-9 Ft 6-8 Ft

Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/21/2014

PARAMETER mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

Gasoline Range Organics [C6 - C10] <0.12 <0.11 105*

Diesel Range Organics [C10 - C28] 41 68 380*

* Action levels are for Category 1 (the most conservative)

4.3.6 Soil Results Summary

The VAP generic direct contact soil standards were used as a comparison for magnitude

of concentrations and to quickly ascertain whether or not excavation and handling of soils may

be a potential issue. First, because there were no VOCs detected above the laboratory reporting

limit, no issues relating to VOCs were identified in this investigation. However, analytical

results indicated that concentrations of three metals (arsenic, lead and mercury) in at least one

boring may pose a potential handling issue and need to be investigated further. Similarly,

concentrations of one SVOC (benzo[a]pyrene) were indicated as a potential contaminant of

concern.

Based on the results for a construction/excavation scenario, a more conservative approach

of comparing soil results to VAP residential exposure values was undertaken, even though the

assumptions of a 30-year exposure by residents were clearly not comparative to an average

tenure of 14 days at the facility and an anticipated maximum tenure of one year (based on the

fact that misdemeanor sentences under ORC 2929.29 can add to 360 days). Similarly, it was

anticipated that any residents would have direct contact with the soil inside a building or in a

paved parking lot. When this comparison was undertaken, concentrations of six metals

(antimony, arsenic, chromium, copper, lead, and mercury) exceeded VAP residential use values.

56

Similarly, six SVOCs (benz[a]anthracene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene,

benzo[k]fluoranthene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene, and indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene) also exceeded

residential use values.

Finally, results were compared to a commercial/industrial exposure scenario to evaluate

potential exposure of an employee at the facility. Again, the values for this scenario assume that

the worker would have direct contact with the soil for 25 years, when it is known that the worker

would not be directly exposed to soil within a building or a paved parking lot. Results of

comparison of measured analytical results to VAP values for commercial/industrial exposure

showed that four metals (arsenic, chromium, lead, and mercury) as well as five of the same

SVOCs (benz[a]anthracene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, dibenz(a,h)anthracene, and

indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene) exceeded the VAP values.

Although analytical concentrations of VOCs, GRO, and DRO posed no site issues, based

on the results for selected metals and SVOCs at the site, it was determined that a site-specific

risk assessment should be undertaken to further evaluate potential pathways and potential

exposures that might need to be addressed during construction/excavation activities. Risk

assessment is addressed in Section 5.

4.4 Characterization of Groundwater in the Fill Materials

4.4.1 Introduction

At the time the investigation was begun, it was known that previous subsurface

investigations had encountered saturation within the fill materials. When this investigation was

conducted, saturation was encountered in only two of the borings (that seemed to loosely

correspond to the location of the abandoned Hocking River channel), and only with minimal

depth of water. However, temporary monitoring wells were installed at these two locations.

Groundwater samples were subsequently collected, even though it was not possible to reduce the

turbidity of the samples due to the shallowness of the water (one half foot in one well and 1.5

feet of water in the other well).

Samples were collected for analysis of total metals, but due to the excessive turbidity in

the samples (the water was black and opaque), it was anticipated that the metals concentrations

would be artificially high due to the “release” of metals sorbed to the fine particles when nitric

acid was added in the field to preserve the sample for laboratory transport (a typical and

necessary part of collection of water samples for metals analysis). In this situation, where metals

are released into suspension as part of the acidification process, the metals results are typically

artificially high and not representative of the groundwater quality. Typically, this situation is

remedied by developing a permanent well or by changing the sample collection method to

minimize the turbidity (such as low flow sampling). However, due to the small amount of water

in the well, minimizing the turbidity by changing sample collection methods was not possible.

In order to collect representative samples for metals in this situation, a second sample

was collected for dissolved metals. In this situation, the sample is filtered to reduce the turbidity

prior to adding the nitric acid for sample preservation and transport. If the results are widely

57

variable between the two samples, the dissolved sample is used as representative of groundwater

quality.

Results from water samples are compared to Primary and Secondary Drinking Water

Standards established by USEPA and incorporated in OAC 3745-81. Primary drinking water

standards are legally-enforceable standards that apply to public drinking water systems.

However, these standards are frequently used as default groundwater standards, particularly

where groundwater is used as a source of drinking water. Maximum Contaminant Levels

(MCLs) are established based on potential health effects from long-term exposure above the

MCL (unless exposure is specified as short-term).

Secondary drinking water standards (also established by USEPA are non-mandatory

water quality standards that are established only as for aesthetic considerations, such as taste,

color and odor. These contaminants are not considered to present a risk to human health at the

established standard.

4.4.2 Total and Dissolved Metals Results in Groundwater Within the Fill

Samples were collected from the two temporary monitoring wells and analyzed for the 23

metals in the “target analyte list”. Samples were analyzed by Methods 6010B/7470B. Tables 16

and 17 show the analytical results for total and dissolved metals, respectively, temporary

monitoring well number and method detection limit as well as the primary and secondary

drinking water standards from OAC 3745-81. It is important to note that lead and copper are

regulated by a treatment technique that requires systems to control the corrosiveness of their

water. Copper also has a secondary drinking water standard based on aesthetic conditions.

Appendix I contains the laboratory results.

The results for total metals in the samples (Table 16) show that ten metals (antimony,

arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury and selenium) exceed the

primary drinking water standards. Similarly, five metals (aluminum, iron, manganese, silver,

and zinc) exceed their respective secondary drinking water standards. However, Table 17 shows

that in the dissolved samples, only arsenic in one well exceeds the primary drinking water

standards. Similarly, in the dissolved metals samples, two secondary drinking water standards

(iron and manganese) are exceeded. Based on these results, it is clear that the total metals are

strongly influenced by the turbidity of the sample and that the dissolved results are representative

of the concentrations of metals in the groundwater in the fill.

It should be noted that both Table 16 and Table 17 have columns for the laboratory

reporting limit as well as the method detection limit. Although the laboratory can “detect” the

presence of the analyte at the listed concentration, the laboratory reporting limit represents the

limit at which the laboratory can reliably quantify the result. This is similar to an eye

examination wherein you can see letters on one line of the eye chart, but are not quite sure that

you can accurately identify all of them. This is similar to the detection limit. However, the next

larger line in the eye chart allows you not only to know the numbers are there, but also to

identify them with accuracy. This is similar to the laboratory reporting limit.

Table 16. Analytical results for total metals in groundwater in the fill.

WELL NUMBER BW1 BW4 Laboratory Method Primary Secondary

Sample Date 03/31/2014 03/31/2014 Reporting Detection Drinking Water Drinking Water

Water Water Limit Limit Standard Standard

Parameter mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L

Aluminum 59 100 0.2 0.097 0.05-0.2

Antimony 0.020 0.035 0.010 0.0021 0.006

Arsenic 0.210 0.700 0.010 0.0032 0.010

Barium 6.3 B 4.9 B 0.2 0.00067 2.0

Beryllium 0.0045J 0.0099 0.005 0.00046 0.004

Cadmium 0.018 1.2 0.002 0.00066 0.005

Calcium 350 B 250 B 5 0.13

Chromium 0.8 1.3 0.005 0.0022 0.1

Cobalt 0.024 0.12 0.007 0.0017

Copper 0.77 3.1 0.025 0.0045 1.3 1.0

Iron 230 480 0.1 0.081 0.3

Lead 4.5 18 0.015 0.0095* 0.015

Magnesium 59 44 5 0.034

Manganese 2.8 6 0.015 0.00096 0.05

Mercury 0.046 0.016 0.002* 0.0012* 0.002

Nickel 0.11 0.69 0.04 0.0032

Potassium 26 19 5 0.072

Selenium 0.014 7 0.005 0.0041 0.05

Silver 0.0097 0.85 0.005 0.0022 0.1

Sodium 330 59 5 0.59

Thallium < 0.01 0.0077 J 0.01 0.0047 0.002

Vanadium 0.068 0.25 0.007 0.0024

Zinc 11 B 29 B 0.25 0.025 5



Concentration greater than Primary Drinking Water Standard

Concentration greater than Secondary Drinking Water Standard

*Metal has different method detection limits and reporting limits. The highest limit is shown.


Table 17. Analytical results for dissolved metals in groundwater in the fill.

WELL NUMBER BW1 BW4 Laboratory Method Primary Secondary

Sample Date 03/31/2014 03/31/2014 Reporting Detection Drinking Water Drinking Water

Water Water Limit Limit Standard Standard

Parameter mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L

Aluminum <0.2 <0.2 0.2 0.097 0.05-0.2

Antimony <0.010 <0.010 0.010 0.0021 0.006

Arsenic 0.0078 J 0.043 0.010 0.0032 0.010

Barium 0.4 B 0.21 B 0.2 0.00067 2.0

Beryllium <0.005 <0.005 0.005 0.00046 0.004

Cadmium <0.002 <0.002 0.002 0.00066 0.005

Calcium 290 B 160 B 5 0.13

Chromium 0.0033 J <0.005 0.005 0.0022 0.1

Cobalt <0.007 0.0037 J 0.007 0.0017

Copper <0.025 <0.025 0.025 0.0045 1.3 1

Iron 15 5.1 0.1 0.081 0.3

Lead 0.0027 J <0.003 0.015 0.0019 0.015

Magnesium 45 23 5 0.034

Manganese 1 1.1 0.015 0.00096 0.05

Mercury <0.002 <0.002 0.0004 0.0012 0.002

Nickel 0.0049 J 0.0094 J 0.04 0.0032

Potassium 17 8.7 5 0.072

Selenium <5.0 4.9J 0.005 0.0041 0.05

Silver <0.005 <0.005 0.005 0.0022 0.1

Sodium 360 62 5 0.59

Thallium < 0.01 < 0.01 0.01 0.0047 0.002

Vanadium <0.007 <0.007 0.007 0.0024

Zinc 0.047 JB 0.13 B 0.25 0.024 5



Concentration greater than Primary Drinking Water Standard

Concentration greater than Secondary Drinking Water Standard


60

Where the laboratory “detects” concentrations below the reporting limit, the estimated

result is displayed and the concentration is flagged with a “J”. On Tables 16 and 17, these values

are shaded in gray as well. Although the laboratory reporting limits are sometimes greater than

the primary drinking water standard for Method 6010B, the detection limits are always below

primary drinking water standard (except for thallium, which is 0.0027 mg/L higher than the

primary drinking water standard). Therefore, this method is acceptable for use when performing

analyses for presence/absence of metals, where absolute concentrations are not required under a

regulatory program.

With regard to the levels of iron and manganese detected at the site, these levels are

typical of many natural formations in Ohio, particularly in sand and gravel deposits. Many

public water supply systems have concentrations similar to these in one of more of their wells

and employ treatment to remove or reduce these constituents in a water treatment plant.

Therefore, these constituents are not determined to be a potential issue at the site.

With regard to the concentration of arsenic (0.043 mg/L) in temporary monitoring well

BW-4, although this concentration exceeds the primary drinking water standard, the value of

arsenic is relatively low. No detections of arsenic are noted in the finished water in the 2009

through 2013 Consumer Confidence Reports for the City of Lancaster, Ohio Miller Park

Wellfield water treatment plant (available online at the City of Lancaster, Ohio website).

4.4.3 VOC Results in Groundwater Within the Fill

Samples were collected from the two temporary monitoring wells and analyzed for the 48

VOCs in the “target compound list”. Samples were analyzed by Method 8260B. Table 18

shows the analytical results for the detected VOCs and the temporary monitoring well from

which the sample was collected. Appendix I contains the laboratory results.

The results for VOCs in the samples (Table 18) show that only three VOCs were detected

above the detection limit. Two of these (acetone and methylene) were also found in laboratory

samples called “blanks” (noted as a “B” on Table 18). Laboratory blanks are analyzed as part of

a quality assurance/quality control process to assess the accuracy of the laboratory analyses.

Both acetone and methylene chloride are common laboratory contaminants. When the chemical

is found in both the sample and the blank in low concentrations, the result is usually attributed to

laboratory contamination and discarded. The results from the water samples compare favorably

with the soil samples in that VOCs were not detected above the reporting limit in either the soils

or the water samples form the site.

61

Table 18. Analytical results for VOCs detected in groundwater in the fill.

WELL NUMBER BW1 BW4

TRIP

BLANK Laboratory Method

Sample Date 03/31/2014 03/31/2014 03/31/2014 Reporting Detection

Water Water Water Limit Limit

PARAMETER ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L

2-Butanone (MEK) <10 0.61 J <10 10 0.57

Acetone 3.0 J B 4.0 J B <10 10 1.1

Methylene Chloride <1.0 <1.0 0.41 J B 1 0.33

Concentration between Reporting Limit and Method

Detection Limit

B = Method blank

contamination

4.4.4 Groundwater Within the Fill Summary

Groundwater samples were collected from two temporary monitoring wells installed in

the saturated fill materials. Only .5 to 1.5 feet of water was present in the monitoring wells when

they were sampled. Although efforts were taken to minimize turbidity during sampling, the

water was excessively turbid. The water was black and affected the results of the total metals

samples when metals were de-sorbed and placed into solution when the sample was acidified.

Therefore, the dissolved metals sample was representative of the water quality within the fill.

No VOCs were detected above the reporting limit. Only one sample for arsenic in one of

the wells exceeded the primary drinking water standard for arsenic.

62

SECTION 5

RISK ASSESSMENT

5.1 Introduction

As described in previous sections, a preliminary indication of the magnitude of the

concentrations of the individual metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and semi-volatile

organic compounds (SVOCs), was obtained by comparing soils results to generic direct contact

soil standards found in the Voluntary Action Program (VAP) OAC 3745-300-08. Initially, the

results were compared to the construction/excavation scenario, but residential exposure and

commercial/industrial activities were also reviewed. Based on this preliminary evaluation, it was

determined that a site-specific risk assessment should be undertaken to further evaluate potential

pathways and potential exposures that might need to be addressed during

construction/excavation activities and during future occupation of the building.

5.2 Data Evaluation

Soil samples taken at different depths during drilling were collected as described in

Section 3.3. Analytical data from these samples forms the basis of the risk analysis detailed

below. Tables 19, 20, and 21 list the metals, VOCs and SVOCs, respectively, detected in

borings at the site. The following metals were detected above the reporting limit: aluminum,

antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, lead,

magnesium, manganese, mercury, nickel, potassium, selenium, silver, sodium, thallium,

vanadium and zinc (Table 19). Calcium, magnesium, iron, potassium and sodium were omitted

as chemicals of concern due to a lack of information on possible negative health effects caused

by these metals. Cobalt, copper, nickel and silver were omitted due to the extremely limited

toxicological data available for these metals. Thallium was not included as a chemical of

concern because it was only detected above the reporting limit in one sample from boring BW-4.

Lead was evaluated separately from the other chemicals of concern (COC), as recommended by

USEPA (Section 5-10). Therefore, the metals evaluated during the quantitative risk assessment

were: aluminum, antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, manganese,

mercury, selenium, vanadium and zinc.

No VOCs were detected in any sample above the laboratory reporting limits (Table 20).

Therefore, no VOCs were examined during this risk assessment. Several SVOCs were reported

above the laboratory detection limits: 2-methyl naphthalene, acenaphthene, acenaphthylene,

anthracene, benz[a]anthracene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[g,h,i]perylene,

benzo[k]fluoranthene, chrysene, dibenz[a,h]anthracene, dibenzofuran, fluoranthene, fluorene,

indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, naphthalene, phenanthrene and pyrene (Table 21). Dibenzofuran was

omitted from the risk assessment because it was only detected above the reporting limit in one

sample from boring BW-7. The remaining detected SVOCs were designated as COCs in the risk

assessment.



Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014

PARAMETER mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

Aluminum 7500 5800 5700 2600 6500 4500 6800 4000 11000 4700 4600 5700 4500 5600 5300 6100 1400

Antimony 43 11 14 1.3 0.74 J 0.78 J <6.0 0.69 J 0.97 J <1.0 0.51 J 0.39 J 0.41 J 5.9 1.2 0.58 J <0.82

Arsenic 18 94 22 7.0 12 8.8 36 11 34 3.6 6.8 7.1 9.2 460 23 12 1.9

Barium 450 3300 500 27 68 B 61 920 32 220 22 27 57 B 44 B 170 B 160 B 120 B 11 J B

Beryllium 0.68 0.56 J 0.34 J 0.11 J 0.46 J 0.21 J 2.0 0.27 J 0.80 J 0.17 J 0.25 J 0.26 J 0.37 J 0.43 J 0.39 J 0.62 0.058 J

Cadmium 1.4 6.4 6.8 0.39 0.43 0.25 2.6 0.53 6.5 0.16 J 1.9 0.41 0.33 4.1 3.3 1.3 0.062 J

Calcium 58000 60000 57000 7800 15000 4700 21000 36000 19000 2600 28000 5800 9100 12000 7900 10000 1400

Chromium 37 330 81 35 16 34 60 19 120 8.9 19 26 22 23 20 15 8.6

Cobalt 6.2 6.7 J 4.6 J 2.5 J 4.7 J 4.1 J 12 5.2 11 2.6 J 3.3 J 3.4 J 4.1 J 8.1 6.8 6.8 1.4 J

Copper 62 300 2300 61 36 58 360 40 77 10 21 96 74 56 41 31 8.7

Iron 24000 95000 45000 19000 22000 30000 150000 22000 91000 9900 15000 22000 28000 31000 22000 20000 8100

Lead 1100 2000 1600 18 41 32 1400 25 260 9.2 14 44 55 260 230 150 5.9

Magnesium 7800 13000 9200 3100 4800 640 3100 11000 3700 970 6300 1600 3000 3500 2700 3200 510

Manganese 470 860 680 170 400 620 790 370 760 150 220 450 380 440 380 560 91

Mercury 0.29 57 8 0.044J 0.080 J <0.10 6.2 0.051 J 1.1 <0.12 0.017J 0.069 J 0.15 0.60 0.54 0.25 0.035 J

Nickel 24 34 14 25 27 37 56 44 36 7.7 14 34 37 26 28 43 10

Potassium 920 850 J 770 320 J 720 B 440 J 470 J 730 1700 650 660 530 B 490 J B 810 B 740 B 790 B 150 J B

Selenium 0.71 5.5 2.3 0.49 <0.51 0.54 2.3 <0.47 4.7 1.4 0.83 0.62 0.85 9.4 4.6 0.73 <0.41

Silver 1.0 3.7 0.23 J <0.45 <0.51 <0.47 <0.60 <0.47 0.96 J <0.50 <0.40 <0.45 <0.51 0.63 0.66 0.17 J <0.41

Sodium 510 J 960 J 190 J 130 J 290 J 94 J 180 J 77 J 210 J 350 J 490 810 610 110 J 81 J 210 J 100 J

Thallium <1.2 1.5 J <0.96 <0.90 <1.0 <0.93 1.6 <0.93 1.2 J <1.0 <0.80 <0.91 <1.0 <1.2 <0.87 <0.95 <0.82

Vanadium 20 24 19 8.5 17 14 23J 14 30 12 15 10 10 18 13 16 4.6

Zinc 390 4500 1300 26 92 46 1000 71 700 19 34 100 66 500 300 150 11


J = concentration between method reporting limit and method detection limit

Table 19. Analytical results for metals in soil samples.

BORING NUMBER BW1 BW2 BW3 BW4 BW6 BW6 BW7 BW7A BW8 BW8A BW9 BW9A BW10 BW10A

Depth 10-12 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 4-6 Ft 1-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft 4-6 Ft 4-6 Ft 0-2 Ft 0-2 Ft 2-4 Ft 2-4 Ft

Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/31/2014 3/21/2014 3/31/2014 3/21/2014 3/31/2014 3/21/2014 3/31/2014

PARAMETER mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0037 0.00017 J B 0.00027 J B <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0025

2-Butanone (MEK) 0.0014 J <0.011 <0.015 <0.013 <0.0097 <0.014 0.00085 J H <0.010 <0.014 <0.0093 <0.011 <0.012 <0.013 <0.010

Acetone 0.0057 J <0.011 <0.015 <0.013 0.0095 J <0.014 <0.011 <0.010 <0.014 <0.0093 <0.011 0.0070 J <0.013 <0.010

Isopropylbenzene <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0037 0.00060 J <0.0024 <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0025

Methyl acetate 0.0014 J <0.0057 <0.0073 <0.0064 <0.0048 <0.0069 <0.0057 <0.0051 <0.0069 <0.0046 <0.0055 <0.0060 <0.0066 <0.0051

Methylene Chloride <0.0035 0.00053 J <0.0037 <0.0032 <0.0024 <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 0.00041 J <0.0033 <0.0025

Styrene <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0037 <0.0032 0.000093 J <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0025

Toluene <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0037 0.00021 J <0.0024 <0.0035 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0035 <0.0023 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0025



Table 20. Analytical results for VOCs in soil samples.



Sample Date 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/20/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014 3/21/2014

PARAMETER mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg

1,1'-Biphenyl <0.250 <53 0.016 J 0.0093 J 0.0066 J 0.040 J <0.330 0.033 J <0.57 <0.056 0.0067 J 0.036 J 0.049 J 0.016 J 0.023 J 0.013 J 0.025 J

2-Methylnaphthalene 0.033 3.7 J 0.047 0.045 0.038 0.19 0.1 0.091 0.096 0.028 0.033 0.12 0.55 0.09 0.13 0.057 0.12

Acenaphthene <0.033 19 0.12 0.024 0.021 0.043 0.1 0.039 0.055 J <0.0074 0.012 0.4 0.19 0.073 0.089 0.093 0.029

Acenaphthylene <0.033 75 0.057 <0.0072 0.0044 J <0.018 0.032 J 0.015 <0.076 <0.0074 <0.0073 0.016 0.024 0.036 0.039 0.013 <0.030

Acetophenone <0.49 <110 <0.29 <0.11 <0.12 0.028 J <0.66 <0.22 <1.1 <0.11 <0.11 0.027 J 0.088 J <0.24 <0.3 0.012 J <0.450

Anthracene 0.027 J 170 0.3 0.017 0.014 0.063 0.21 0.084 0.3 <0.0074 0.021 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.18 0.047 0.09

Benzaldehyde 0.0240 J <110 0.063 J <0.11 <0.12 <0.27 0.19 J <0.22 <1.1 <0.11 <0.11 0.036 J 0.076 J 0.038 J <0.3 0.024 J <0.45

Benz[a]anthracene 0.15 420 1 0.2 0.15 0.87 1.8 0.62 6.1 0.034 0.13 0.81 0.69 0.98 1.1 0.43 0.91

Benzo[a]pyrene 0.46 370 1 0.32 0.25 1.6 3.2 0.97 5.4 0.33 0.2 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.5 0.81 2.2

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.41 420 1.4 0.58 0.37 2.5 3.9 1.6 5 0.57 0.33 1.9 2.1 1.7 2.7 1.3 3.4

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.5 200 0.65 0.39 0.3 2.4 3 1.4 4.2 1.1 0.23 1.7 0.51 1.2 0.6 0.41 1.1

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.087 180 0.49 0.17 0.14 0.76 1.6 0.48 0.92 0.15 0.082 0.74 0.54 0.66 0.61 0.32 0.93

Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate <0.340 <75 <0.2 0.035 J B <0.083 <0.19 <0.47 <0.15 <0.8 0.027 J B 0.1 B 0.043 J 0.063 J B <0.17 0.064 J B 0.04 J B <0.31

Carbazole <0.25 <53 0.098 J <0.054 <0.059 <0.13 <0.33 <0.11 <0.57 <0.056 <0.055 <0.11 <0.11 0.11 J 0.12 J <0.057 <0.22

Chrysene 0.19 380 1.1 0.27 0.21 1.2 1.9 0.76 9.5 0.65 0.18 0.99 0.79 1.1 1.3 0.48 1.1

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.33 59 0.18 0.095 0.064 0.54 0.72 0.3 3.6 0.24 0.06 0.38 0.14 0.27 0.17 0.1 0.24

Dibenzofuran <0.25 27 J 0.071 J 0.017 J 0.013 J 0.066 J 0.061 J 0.037 J 0.050 J 0.016 J 0.012 J 0.084 J 0.14 0.039 J 0.065 J 0.026 J 0.044 J

Di-n-butyl phthalate <0.34 <75 <0.2 <0.075 <0.083 <0.19 <0.47 <0.15 <0.8 <0.078 20.01 J <0.16 <0.16 <0.17 <0.21 0.035 J B <0.31

Fluoranthene 0.2 980 2 0.22 0.18 0.79 1.7 0.8 1.7 0.016 0.22 0.82 0.75 1.6 1.8 0.48 0.94

Fluorene <0.033 67 0.1 0.0064 J 0.0061 J 0.021 0.056 0.021 0.1 <0.0074 <0.0073 0.08 0.056 0.039 0.057 0.017 0.043

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.26 180 0.53 0.29 0.22 1.7 2.4 1 2.2 0.78 0.16 1.2 0.44 0.91 0.51 0.33 0.85

Naphthalene <0.033 13 0.08 0.033 0.024 0.13 0.1 0.086 0.19 0.017 0.022 0.13 0.37 0.083 0.15 0.048 0.094

Pentachlorophenol <0.74 <160 <0.44 <0.16 <0.18 <0.4 0.3 J <0.33 <1.7 <0.17 <0.17 <0.34 <0.33 <0.36 <0.45 <0.17 <0.67

Phenanthrene 0.1 570 1.3 0.11 0.086 0.4 0.8 0.4 1.2 0.03 0.12 0.51 0.63 0.7 0.93 0.24 0.43

Pyrene 0.16 800 1.8 0.19 0.18 0.73 1.6 0.69 2.3 0.014 0.19 0.87 0.81 1.5 1.8 0.47 1



Table 21. Analytical results for SVOCs in soil samples.

66

Table 22 shows the toxicological information for each of the organic and inorganic

COCs. Where available, the reference dose (RfD), reference concentration (RfC), slope factor

(cancer) and inhalation unit risk (cancer) are provided for each COC. In addition, the source of

information is noted in the table. Per EPA guidance (USEPA, 2003a; Ohio EPA, 2010a), the

following sources of information were accessed (in order of priority):

• Tier I – Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS);

• Tier II – USEPA PPRTVs (provisional peer reviewed toxicity values); and

• Tier III – other sources of information including California EPA peer reviewed toxicity

values, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels, HEAST

values (for radionuclides).

5.3 Exposure Assessment

Exposure assessment is the estimation of the magnitude, frequency, duration and route of

exposure for current and future human exposures. Exposure assessment includes:

1) the characterization of the exposure setting with respect to potentially exposed human

populations and physical site characteristics;

2) identification of potential exposure pathways;

3) estimation of potential exposure concentrations; and

4) estimation of potential chemical intakes.

The first two sections are discussed below. The third and fourth sections have been

combined into discussions of dermal risk (Section 5.4), inhalation of volatile COCs (Section

5.5), inhalation of particulate COCs (Section 5.6), and inhalation of indoor air (Section 5.9).

5.3.1 Characterization of Exposure Setting

Characterizing the exposure setting consists of identifying the physical characteristics of

the site, human populations on or near the site, and current and potential future land uses. A

description of the history of the site is presented in Section 2.

The site is in an urban area, in downtown Lancaster, Ohio. The proposed future land use

is the proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility. Currently, the site is a paved

parking lot adjacent to the existing Fairfield County Sheriff’s Office. Previously, the site had

been filled using foundry sand. The site is supplied by both sanitary sewers and municipal water.

Table 22. Toxicity values for chemicals of concern.

Chemical

Chronic RfD

(mg/kg-day)

Confidence level

of RfD

Chronic RfC

(ug/m3)

Confidence

level of RfC

Oral Cancer

Slope Factor (kg-

day/mg)

Inhalation Unit

Risk (m3/ug) Source Critical Effect (RfD)

Aluminum 1.0E+00 Low 5.0E+00 Low to Medium PPRTV Neurological impacts

Antimony 4.0E-04 Low IRIS

Longevity, blood glucose

and cholesterol

Arsenic 3.0E-04 Medium 1.50E+00 4.30E-03 IRIS

Hyperpigmentation,

keratosis, possible

vascular complications

Barium 2.0E-01 Medium IRIS Nephropathy

Beryllium 2.0E-03 Low to Medium 2.0E-02 Medium

Inadequate for

assessment of

carcinogenicity 2.40E-03 IRIS Small intestine lesions

Cadmium 5.0E-04 High

Inadequate

evidence of

carcinogenicity 1.80E-03 IRIS Proteinuria

Chromium^ 3.0E-03 Low 1.0E-04 Medium

Classification D -

not classifiable as

to human

carcinogenicity 1.20E-02 IRIS None reported

Manganese 1.4E-01 Medium 5.0E-05 Medium IRIS

Central nervous system

effects

Mercury 3.0E-04 Medium IRIS

Selenium 5.0E-03 High IRIS Clinical selenosis

Vanadium 9.0E-03 Low IRIS Decreased hair cysteine

Zinc 3.0E-01 Medium to High IRIS

Decreases in ESOD

activity

Acenaphthene 6.0E-02 Low IRIS Hepatotoxicity

Acenaphthylene IRIS

Anthracene 3.0E-01 Low IRIS No observed effects

Benz[a]anthracene Not available 1.1E-4 * IRIS

Benzo[a]pyrene 7.30E+00 1.1E-3 * IRIS

Benzo[b]fluoranthene Not available 1.1E-4 * IRIS

Carcinogenicity unknownNot available

Classification D - not classifiable

as to human carcinogenicity

Not available



Not available

Not available

Not available


as to human carcinogenicityNot recommended

Not available



Carcinogenicity assessment not

completed

Not available

Inadequate for assessment of

carcinogenicity


carcinogenicity

Not available Not available




Not available






Table 22. Toxicity values for chemicals of concern.

Chemical

Chronic RfD

(mg/kg-day)

Confidence level

of RfD

Chronic RfC

(ug/m3)

Confidence

level of RfC

Oral Cancer

Slope Factor (kg-

day/mg)

Inhalation Unit

Risk (m3/ug) Source Critical Effect (RfD)


Benzo[g,h,i]perylene IRIS

Benzo[k]fluoranthene Not available 1.1E-4 * IRIS

Chrysene Not available 1.1E-5 * IRIS

Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Not available 1.1E-3 * IRIS

Fluoranthene 4.0E-02 Low IRIS

Nephropathy, liver

impacts, hematological

alterations

Fluorene 4.0E-02 Low IRIS

Decreased RBC, packed

cell volume and

hemoglobin

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Not available 1.1E-4 * IRIS

2-Methylnaphthalene 4.0E-03 Low IRIS

pulmonary alveolar

proteinosis

Naphthalene 2.0E-02 Low 3.0E+00 Low to Medium

Inadequate

studies available 3.4E-2 * IRIS

Decreased body weight in

males

Phenanthrene IRIS

Pyrene 3.0E-02 Low IRIS Kidney effects

^Values for Chromium(IV) were used to be conservative, RFC based on exposure to particulates

* values from US EPA Mid-Atlantic Risk Assessment Tables

Inadequate evidence of

carcinogenicityInadequate data

Not available









Not available



Not available







69

5.3.2 Potential Receptors and Exposure Pathways

Given the current and future land use envisioned at the site, the three populations with the

potential to be impacted are adult residents of the prison, adults working at the jail and onsite

workers involved in excavation and construction. The proposed prison facilities do not have

capacity for juvenile offenders and any child visitors can be expected to be onsite only for short

periods of time while visiting adult offenders.

Possible exposure routes for onsite excavation and construction workers include:

ingestion, inhalation and dermal contact. Ingestion of chemicals of concern is not a significant

concern because water at the site is not used as a drinking water source and the site is supplied

by municipal water. However, during excavation and construction, on-site workers may be

exposed to chemicals of concern through dermal contact and inhalation of outdoor air (Table 23).

Table 23. Exposure pathways for risk assessment

Land Use Potentially Exposed Population Exposure Route, Media and

Exposure Point

Future

Construction and

Excavation On-site Workers

Dermal contact with chemicals of

concern in soil during excavation

and construction

Construction and

Excavation On-site Workers Inhalation of chemicals of concern

during excavation and construction

Industrial On-site Workers Inhalation of chemicals of concern

in indoor air

Residential On-site Adult Residents Inhalation of chemicals of concern

in indoor air

Possible exposure routes for adult residents at the proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public

Safety Facility include: ingestion, inhalation and dermal contact. Ingestion of chemicals of

concern is not a significant concern because water at the site is not used as a drinking water

source and the site is supplied by municipal water. The dermal exposure route for residents will

not be a complete pathway because the plans for the proposed jail call for covering the soil with

asphalt. However, residents may be exposed to chemicals of concern through inhalation of

indoor air (Table 23).

Possible exposure routes for adult workers at the proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public

Safety Facility include: ingestion, inhalation and dermal contact. Ingestion of chemicals of

concern is not a significant concern because water at the site is not used as a drinking water

source and the site is supplied by municipal water. The dermal exposure route for workers will

not be a complete pathway because the plans for the proposed jail call for covering the soil with

70

asphalt. However, workers may be exposed to chemicals of concern through inhalation of indoor

air (Table 23).

5.3.3 Quantification of Exposure

The exposure assessment proceeded through several steps to quantify the intake of each

chemical for each pathway. The first step was to calculate an exposure concentration for each

COC. The second step was to determine the input parameters for the intake equation. Lastly, the

intake was calculated for each COC.

Soil samples were taken from discrete depths from ten borings on the site. The maximum

depth of excavation expected by the architects is six feet. Therefore, exposure to construction

and excavation workers will be limited to the top six feet of soil. To be conservative, the

analytical data for the top eight feet were used in the assessment of dermal exposure. Inhalation

exposure was calculated using all data collected at the site.

To obtain the concentration that best represents the reasonable maximum exposure

(RME) that is expected to occur at the site, either the 95 or 99 percent upper confidence limit

(UCL) on the mean was calculated for the chemicals of concern evaluated in the risk assessment

and compared to the largest detected concentration. The UCL or the largest detected

concentration, whichever is less, was used in the exposure calculations to represent the average

concentration of the chemicals of concern at the site. The 95 percent UCL is a conservative

estimate of the average concentration that equals or exceeds the true average 95 percent of the

time. Similarly, the 99 percent UCL is a conservative estimate of the average concentration that

equals or exceeds the true average 99 percent of the time.

Tables 24 and 25 present the minimum and maximum detected concentrations, and the

UCL for inorganic and organic contaminants used in the dermal risk assessment (0-8 feet),

respectively. Tables 26 and 27 present the minimum and maximum detected concentrations, and

the UCL for inorganic and organic contaminants used in the inhalation risk assessment (0-12

feet), respectively.

The USEPA software program ProUCL was used to calculate UCL values for each

dataset. Data was initially screened for normality using ProUCL. If data was not normally

distributed, UCLs were calculated using the most appropriate distribution (gamma, lognormal or

non-parametric). Outputs from the ProUCL software are provided in Appendix J through M.

The recommended UCL in the ProUCL software was used in the risk assessment. When

ProUCL recommended more than one possible UCL, the largest value was selected in order to be

as conservative as possible. The concentrations selected for use in the intake equations are

highlighted in Tables 24 through 27.

Table 24. Statistical summary of inorganic sampling results used in the dermal risk assessment (0-8 feet).

Number of

Data

points

Number of

Detects

Mean

(mg/kg)

Standard

Deviation

(mg/kg)

UCL usedUCL

(mg/kg)

Maximum

(mg/kg)

Minimum

(mg/kg)

Aluminum 14 14 4907 1556Normal - 95%

Student's t5644 7500 1400

Antimony 14 5 13.08 17.52Normal - 95% Kaplan

Meijer (t)20.83 43 1.2

Arsenic 14 14 43.03 120.2 Lognormal - 95%

Cherbyshev(mean, sd)

183 460 1.9

Barium 13 12 139.2 165.4Gamma - ROS

Adjusted Gamma 334.6 500 22

Beryllium 14 2 0.65 0.0424 Non-parametric - 95%

Kaplan Meijer (t)

0.281 0.68 0.62

Cadmium 14 12 1.762 2.021Normal - 95% Kaplan

Meijer (t)2.452 6.8 0.25

Chromium 14 14 26.04 18.12Normal - 95%

Student's t34.61 81 8.6

Manganese 14 14 384.4 176.1Normal - 95%

Student's t467.7 680 91

Mercury 14 6 1.638 3.121

Non-parametric - 95%

Kaplan Meijer

bootstrap t

8.259 8 0.15

Selenium 14 11 2.043 2.725 Non-parametric - 95%

Kaplan Meijer (BCA)

2.845 9.4 0.49

Vanadium 14 14 13.65 4.34Normal - 95%

Student's t15.7 20 4.6

Zinc 14 14 221.8 345.1Gamma - 95%

Adjusted Gamma480.2 1300 11

Table 25. Statistical summary of organic sampling results used in the dermal risk assessment (0-8 feet).

Number

of Data

points

Number of

Detects

Mean

(mg/kg)

Standard

Deviation

(mg/kg)

UCL usedUCL

(mg/kg)

Maximum

(mg/kg)

Minimum

(mg/kg)

Acenaphthene 14 12 0.0944 0.109

Normal -

95%Kaplan

Meijer (t)

0.133 0.4 0.012

Acenaphthylene 14 7 0.0286 0.0162

Normal -

95%Kaplan

Meijer (t)

0.025 0.057 0.013

Anthracene 14 12 0.0947 0.0807

Normal -

95%Kaplan

Meijer (t)

0.121 0.3 0.014

Benz[a]anthracene 14 14 0.577 0.383Normal - 95%

Student's t0.758 420 0.034

Benzo[a]pyrene 14 14 0.981 0.619Normal - 95%

Student's t1.274 2.2 0.2

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 14 14 1.49 0.969Normal - 95%

Student's t1.949 3.4 0.33

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 14 14 0.892 0.625Normal - 95%

Student's t1.188 2.4 0.23

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 14 14 0.44 0.283Normal - 95%

Student's t0.574 0.93 0.082

Chrysene 14 14 0.737 0.409Normal - 95%

Student's t0.931 1.3 0.18

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 14 14 0.222 0.136Normal - 95%

Student's t0.286 0.54 0.06

Fluoranthene 14 14 0.773 0.634Normal - 95%

Student's t1.073 2 0.016

Fluorene 14 9 0.0482 0.0283

Normal -

95%Kaplan

Meijer (t)

0.0482 0.1 0.017

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 14 14 0.656 0.442Normal - 95%

Student's t0.865 1.7 0.16

2-Methylnaphthalene 14 14 0.112 0.135

Gamma - 95%

Adjusted

Gamma0.189 0.55 0.028

Naphthalene 14 13 0.0975 0.0931

Normal -

95%Kaplan

Meijer (t)

0.136 0.37 0.017

Phenanthrene 14 14 0.428 0.3367Normal - 95%

Student's t0.865 1.3 0.03

Pyrene 14 14 0.743 0.606Normal -

Student's t1.03 1.8 0.014

Table 26. Statistical summary of inorganic sampling results used in the inhalation risk assessment (0-12 feet).

Number of

Data

points

Number of

Detects

Mean

(mg/kg)

Standard

Deviation

(mg/kg)

UCL usedUCL

(mg/kg)

Maximum

(mg/kg)

Minimum

(mg/kg)

Aluminum 17 17 5429 2067Normal - 95%

Student's t6305 11000 1400

Antimony 17 6 12.73 15.69Normal - 95% Kaplan

Meijer (t)9.582 43 1.2

Arsenic 17 17 45.08 109.1Lognormal - 95%

Herbyshev(mean, sd)160.4 460 1.9

Barium 17 17 364.1 793Gamma - 95%

Adjusted Gamma 796.3 3300 11

Beryllium 17 3 1.1 0.78Normal - 95% Kaplan

Meijer (t)0.497 2 0.62

Cadmium 17 15 2.443 2.429Normal - 95% Kaplan

Meijer (t)3.186 6.8 0.25

Chromium 17 17 51.44 77.33 Lognormal - 95% H 85.04 330 8.6

Manganese 17 17 458.3 229.4Normal - 95%

Student's t555.4 860 91

Mercury 17 9 8.237 18.52

Gamma - 95%

Adjusted Gamma

Kaplan Meijer

33.45 57 0.15

Selenium 17 14 2.498 2.637Lognormal - 95%

Cherbyshev4.806 9.4 0.49

Vanadium 17 16 15.32 6.19Normal - 95% Kaplan

Meijer (t)17.85 30 4.6

Zinc 17 17 547.4 1086Gamma - 95%

Adjusted Gamma1214 4500 11

Table 27. Statistical summary of organic sampling results used in the inhalation risk assessment (0-12 feet).

Number

of Data

points

Number of

Detects

Mean

(mg/kg)

Standard

Deviation

(mg/kg)

UCL usedUCL

(mg/kg)

Maximum

(mg/kg)

Minimum

(mg/kg)

Acenaphthene 17 14 1.445 5.054

Nonparametric -

99% Kaplan

Meijer

(Chebyshev)

12.34 19 0.012

Acenaphthylene 17 8 9.4 26.51

Nonparametric -

99% Kaplan

Meijer

(Chebyshev)

49.94 75 0.013

Anthracene 17 15 11.44 43.86

Nonparametric -

99% Kaplan

Meijer

(Chebyshev)

110 170 0.014

Benz[a]anthracene 17 17 25.65 101.6

Nonparametric -

99% Chebyshev

(mean, sd)

270.9 420 0.034

Benzo[a]pyrene 17 17 23.08 89.41

Nonparametric -

99% Chebyshev

(mean, sd)

238.8 370 0.2

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 17 17 26.46 101.4

Nonparametric -

99% Chebyshev

(mean, sd)

271.2 4240 0.33

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 17 17 12.92 48.22

Lognormal -

99% Chebyshev

(mean, sd)

129.3 200 0.23

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 17 17 11.1 43.53

Nonparametric -

99% Chebyshev

(mean, sd)

116.1 180 0.082

Chrysene 17 17 23.63 91.86

Nonparametric -

99% Chebyshev

(mean, sd)

245.3 380 0.18

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 17 17 3.908 14.22

Nonparametric -

99% Chebyshev

(mean, sd)

38.23 59 0.06

Fluoranthene 17 17 58.48 237.5

Nonparametric -

99% Chebyshev

(mean, sd)

631.5 980 0.016

Fluorene 17 12 5.633 19.33

Nonparametric -

99% Kaplan

Meijer

(Chebyshev)

43.69 67 0.017

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 17 17 11.4 43.45

Lognormal -

99% Chebyshev

(mean, sd)

116.3 180 0.16

2-Methylnaphthalene 17 16 0.111 0.126

Gamma - 95%

Kaplan Meijer

(Chebyshev)

0.247 0.55 0.028

Naphthalene 17 16 0.91 3.225

Nonparametric -

99% Kaplan

Meijer

(Chebyshev)

8.426 13 0.017

Phenanthrene 17 17 34 138.1

Nonparametric -

99% Chebyshev

(mean, sd)

367.3 570 0.03

Pyrene 17 17 47.9 193.8

Nonparametric -

99% Chebyshev

(mean, sd)515.6 800 0.014

75

5.4 Dermal Exposure

5.4.1 Determination of Dermal Absorbed Dose

According to USEPA (2004), the dermally absorbed dose per event (DAevent) is defined

as:

DAevent = Csoil x CF x AF x ABSd Equation 1

Where DAevent = absorbed dose per event (mg/cm2

event)

Csoil = chemical concentration in soil (mg/kg)

CF = conversion factor (10-6

kg/mg)

AF = adherence factor of soil to skin (mg/cm2-event)

ABSd = dermal absorption fraction

This dermal absorbed dose per event is then used to calculate the dermal absorbed dose:

DAD = DAevent x EF x ED x EV x SA Equation 2

BW x AT

Where DAD = dermal absorbed dose per event (mg/kg-day)

DAevent = absorbed dose per event (mg/cm2

event)

EF = exposure frequency (days/year)

ED = exposure duration (years)

EV = event frequency (events/day)

SA = skin surface area available for contact (cm2)

BW = body weight (kg)

AT = averaging time (days)

For dermal contact with chemicals in soil during excavation and construction, the only

skin surface areas available for dermal contact are the head, forearms and hands, because the

remainder of the skin is covered with clothing (i.e., pants, short-sleeved shirt). During colder

months (November through April), workers will likely be wearing coats, so this value is

conservative in that it uses the maximum probably exposed skin surface area as the contact area

throughout the year. The value that was used, representing the 50th percentile surface area for

the head, arms and hands of an adult, is 3,300 cm2

(USEPA, 2004).

The exposure used in the calculations was 250 days/year for one year with one contact

event (lasting 24 hours) occurring each day. Given that construction and excavation workers are

expected to work only 8 hours a day (and it is likely that will be removed at the end of the

working day when the employee showers), this exposure is conservative. This exposure

scenario, which assumes that a worker is exposed 50 weeks/year and 5 days per week, was

chosen in order to be conservative. The actual exposure frequency (according to the architect)

will probably be less than a year for any individual working on site. The length of time that the

site will be under excavation is expected to be less than a year with the rest of the two-year

construction estimate being used for construction and finishing. As excavation is completed and

76

areas of the site are paved, the dermal pathway will be removed for construction workers at the

site. An averaging time of one year was used for non-cancer effects and an averaging time of 70

years was used for cancerous effects (USEPA, 2004).

Other input parameters were defined using USEPA guidance (USEPA, 2004 and USEPA,

1992). Body weight of construction and excavation workers was defined to be 70 kg (the default

value used for adult weight in risk assessment calculations). The dermal absorption fraction

from soil was derived from USEPA (2004). These factors are summarized in Table 28. The

activity-specific surface area weighted soil adherence factor selected for construction and

excavation workers was the 95th

percentile value recommended in USEPA (2004) for

construction workers (0.3). All chemicals of concern were evaluated for dermal uptake except

mercury, which is very poorly absorbed through the skin (CDC, 2013).

5.4.2 Non-Cancerous Effects

The dermal absorbed dose (DAD) calculated for each COC was compared to an adjusted

oral RfD value. The adjustment is based on the percentage of absorption of the chemical in the

gastrointestinal system (ABSGI). For chemicals where no ABSGI is available, the default of one

was used per USEPA guidance (USEPA, 2004). The adjusted RfD for dermal exposure for each

COC was calculated as:

RfDabs = RfD / ABSGI Equation 3

Where RfDabs = absorbed reference dose (mg/kg-day)

RfD = oral reference dose (mg/kg-day)

ABSGI= percentage of chemical absorption in the gastrointestinal system

The hazard quotient for each COC was calculated as:

HQ = DAD / RfDabs Equation 4

Where HQ = Hazard quotient

DAD = dermal absorbed dose per event (mg/kg-day)

RfDabs = absorbed reference dose (mg/kg-day)

The hazard quotients for each individual COC were then summed to give the site hazard

index. In general, a hazard index greater than one (1) is considered to pose an unacceptable risk.

The non-cancer risks from dermal exposure to COCs at the site are summarized in Table 29. The

major component of the resultant hazard index of 2.08 is contributed by arsenic (highlighted in

yellow in the table). The risks from dermal exposure to this chemical can be mitigated by

limiting worker exposure to contaminated soil, wearing long sleeved shirts and wearing gloves.

Table 28. Dermal absorption fraction from soil for chemicals in the dermal risk assessment.

Chemicals of Concern

Dermal

Absorption

fraction Reference

Aluminum 0.2

Conservative value - dermally active chemicals are considered

those with an absorption fraction greater than 0.1

Antimony 0.2



Arsenic 0.03 USEPA (2004)

Barium 0.2



Beryllium 0.2



Cadmium 0.001 USEPA (2004)

Chromium 0.2



Manganese 0.2



Selenium 0.2



Vanadium 0.2



Zinc 0.2



Acenaphthene 0.13 USEPA (2004)

Acenaphthylene 0.13 USEPA (2004)

Anthracene 0.13 USEPA (2004)

Benz[a]anthracene 0.13 USEPA (2004)

Benzo[a]pyrene 0.13 USEPA (2004)

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.13 USEPA (2004)

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.13 USEPA (2004)

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.13 USEPA (2004)

Chrysene 0.13 USEPA (2004)

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.13 USEPA (2004)

Fluoranthene 0.13 USEPA (2004)

Fluorene 0.13 USEPA (2004)

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.13 USEPA (2004)

2-Methylnaphthalene 0.13 USEPA (2004)

Naphthalene 0.13 USEPA (2004)

Phenanthrene 0.13 USEPA (2004)

Pyrene 0.13 USEPA (2004)

Table 29. Hazard quotients for chemicals of concern for the dermal pathway.

Chemicals of Concern Csoil

Dermal

Absorption

fraction DAevent DAD Oral RfD ABSGI

Absorbed

RfD

Dermal

Hazard

Quotient

Aluminum 5644 0.2 0.00339 0.10935 1 1.1E-01

Antimony 20.83 0.2 1.2E-05 0.0004 0.0004 0.15 3.75E+02 1.1E-06

Arsenic 183 0.03 1.6E-05 0.00053 0.0003 1.8E+00

Barium 334.6 0.2 0.0002 0.00648 0.2 0.07 3.50E-01 1.9E-02

Beryllium 0.281 0.2 1.7E-07 5.4E-06 0.002 0.007 3.50E+00 1.6E-06

Cadmium 2.452 0.001 7.4E-09 2.4E-07 0.0005 0.0025 5.00E+00 4.8E-08

Chromium 34.61 0.2 2.1E-05 0.00067 0.003 0.013 8.67E-03 8.0E-02

Manganese 467.7 0.2 0.00028 0.00906 0.14 0.04 2.86E-01 3.0E-02

Selenium 2.845 0.2 1.7E-06 5.5E-05 0.005 0.026 5.20E+00 1.1E-05

Vanadium 15.7 0.2 9.4E-06 0.0003 0.005 6.1E-02

Zinc 480.2 0.2 0.00029 0.0093 0.3 3.1E-02

Acenaphthene 0.133 0.13 5.2E-08 1.7E-06 0.06 2.8E-05

Acenaphthylene 0.025 0.13 9.8E-09 3.1E-07 no RfD available

Anthracene 0.121 0.13 4.7E-08 1.5E-06 0.3 5.1E-06

Benz[a]anthracene 0.758 0.13 3E-07 9.5E-06 no RfD available

Benzo[a]pyrene 1.274 0.13 5E-07 1.6E-05 no RfD available

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.949 0.13 7.6E-07 2.5E-05 no RfD available

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1.188 0.13 4.6E-07 1.5E-05 no RfD available

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.574 0.13 2.2E-07 7.2E-06 no RfD available

Chrysene 0.931 0.13 3.6E-07 1.2E-05 no RfD available

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.286 0.13 1.1E-07 3.6E-06 no RfD available

Fluoranthene 1.073 0.13 4.2E-07 1.4E-05 0.04 3.4E-04

Fluorene 0.0482 0.13 1.9E-08 6.1E-07 0.04 1.5E-05

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.865 0.13 3.4E-07 1.1E-05 no RfD available

2-Methylnaphthalene 0.189 0.13 7.4E-08 2.4E-06 0.004 6.0E-04

Naphthalene 0.136 0.13 5.3E-08 1.7E-06 0.02 8.6E-05

Phenanthrene 0.865 0.13 3.4E-07 1.1E-05 no RfD available

Pyrene 1.03 0.13 4E-07 1.3E-05 0.03 4.3E-04

2.10Hazard Index

79

5.4.3 Carcinogenic Effects

Not all COCs are known to cause carcinogenic effects. These include:

• Aluminum – inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity;

• Antimony – carcinogenicity unknown;

• Barium – not classified as a human carcinogen;

• Manganese – not classified as a human carcinogen;

• Selenium – not classified as a human carcinogen;

• Vanadium – inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity via dermal contact;

• Zinc – inadequate evidence of carcinogenicity via dermal contact;

• Acenapthylene – not classified as a human carcinogen;

• Fluorene – not classified as a human carcinogen;

• 2-Methylnaphthalene – not classified as a human carcinogen;

• Naphthalene – not classified as a human carcinogen;

• Phenanthrene – not classified as a human carcinogen; and

• Pyrene – not classified as a human carcinogen.

No oral slope factors are available for beryllium, cadmium and chromium due to

insufficient evidence of carcinogenicity via dermal and oral exposure or due to insufficient data.

These COCs were, therefore, omitted from this analysis.

The toxic equivalency methodology (USEPA, 1993) was used to assess the relative

carcinogenicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) as compared to benzo[a]pyrene.

Toxic equivalency factors and the resultant equivalent concentrations of carcinogenic PAHs are

shown in Table 30.

80

Table 30. Toxic equivalency factors for PAHs and equivalent calculated concentrations.

Csoil

(mg/kg)

Toxic Equivalency

Factor

Equivalent

Concentration (mg/kg)

Acenaphthene 0.133 1 0.133

Anthracene 0.121 0.4 0.048

Benz[a]anthracene 0.758 0.2 0.152

Benzo[a]pyrene 1.274 1 1.274

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.949 0.8 1.559

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1.188 0.009 0.011

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.574 0.03 0.017

Chrysene 0.931 0.1 0.093

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.286 10 2.860

Fluoranthene 1.073 0.08 0.086

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.865 0.07 0.061

Similar to dermal, non-cancerous risks, the oral slope factor was adjusted by the

percentage of chemical absorption in the gastrointestinal system (if known) to estimate dermal

slope factors for the COCs. For chemicals where no ABSGI is available, the default of one was

used per USEPA guidance (USEPA, 2004). The adjusted slope factor for dermal exposure for

each COC was calculated as:

SFabs = SFo x ABSGI Equation 5

Where SFabs = absorbed slope factor (mg/kg-day)-1

SFo = slope factor (mg/kg-day)-1

ABSGI= percentage of chemical absorption in the gastrointestinal system

The dermal cancer risk for each carcinogenic COC was calculated as:

Dermal Cancer Risk = DAD x SFabs Equation 6

Where DAD = dermal absorbed dose per event (mg/kg-day)

SFabs = absorbed slope factor (mg/kg-day)-1

The dermal cancer risks for each individual COC were then summed to give the site

dermal cancer risk. In general, a dermal cancer risk of greater than 10-4

is considered to pose an

unacceptable risk. The cancer risks from dermal exposure to COCs at the site are summarized in

Table 31. The total dermal cancer risk for inorganics and PAHs at the site is 8.5 x 10-6

.

Therefore, there is no carcinogenic risk via the dermal exposure pathway.

81

5.4.4 Uncertainty in the Dermal Risk Analysis

5.4.4.1 Csoil

Fourteen samples were analyzed for COCs. These samples were at depths ranging from

0 to 8 feet below grade. This is sufficient samples to allow for statistical analysis, including the

derivation of UCL values for use in Equation 1.

5.4.4.2 Event Time (EV)

USEPA recommends that the default event time be used. This assumes that no washing

occurs and soil remains in contact with the skin for 24 hours. This assumption overestimates the

expected exposure at this facility. In reality, construction and excavation workers will be onsite

for eight hours and soil will remain in contact with their skin for no more than 12 hours,

assuming workers shower each evening after completing work for the day. In the absence of

detailed information about chemical absorption, it is not possible to assess the degree to which

the exposure is overestimated.

5.4.4.3 Surface Area

USEPA recommends using default skin surface areas based on the assumption that

workers will be wearing pants, boots and a short sleeved shirt during construction and

excavation. During the winter, workers will presumably wearing long sleeved shirts and/or

coats, reducing the exposed skin surface area.

5.4.4.4 Frequency of Exposure

Discussions with the architect led to the conservative assumption that workers would be

exposed to the soil for no more than a year. In reality, the expected exposure is likely to be less

than a year for any individual contractor. Contractors involved with the installation of utilities

(and therefore in close contact with the soil) are expected to be onsite for less than three months.

The foundation to support the building is expected to take approximately four months to install.

Other contractors are expected to have much less exposure to the soil (for example; plumbers,

electricians). Once the site has utilities and the base of construction completed, the area of the

site outside the footprint of the building is to be paved, removing this exposure pathway.

Similarly, once the building slab is poured, the dermal exposure pathway will be interrupted.

The hazard index calculated for workers on site for 90 days during a one year exposure

duration, is 0.75 (skin surface area exposed 3,300 cm2). Therefore, dermal risks to

construction/excavation employees can be managed by reducing the frequency of exposure to 90

days or fewer.

5.4.4.5 Adherence Factors

There is uncertainty associated with the degree with which soil particles absorb to the

skin. The default value suggested by USEPA (2004) of 0.3 was used for construction and

82

excavation workers at the site. If excavation is accomplished mostly using equipment, thereby

minimizing the worker’s contact with the soil, this value could be too high. However, for

workers excavating by hand, this value could be too low. Assuming that any one worker will not

be continuously excavating by hand, this default value was used to characterize average

adherence.

5.4.4.6 Absorption Factors

The amount of the chemical absorbed through the skin from soil particles is dependent on

many physical, chemical and biological factors. USEPA (2004) recommends acknowledging

these sources of uncertainty, but not adjusting the default values provided by USEPA because

there is insufficient quantitative understanding of the impact of these factors of the absorption

factors. For chemicals with no identified absorption factors, the default of 0.2 was used. This

may over or underestimate the risk associated with individual COCs.

5.4.4.7 Toxicity Assessment

Dermal reference doses and dermal slope factors have not been developed by USEPA.

The extrapolation of oral reference doses and oral slope factors to assess dermal exposure

introduces uncertainty into the toxicity assessment. The extrapolation from oral toxicity values

does not account for different patterns of distribution, metabolism and excretion in the dermal

exposure route. Differences between the oral and dermal exposure routes will be different for

different COCs. It is expected that some dermal risks will be overestimated and others

underestimated.

The extrapolation of the oral slope factor to a dermal slope factor for PAHs does not

account for the direct carcinogenic activity at the point of contact. The oral slope factor takes

into account systemic effects at locations separated from the point of contact. However,

carcinogenic PAHs (including benzo[a]pyrene), may cause skin cancer when in contact with the

skin (animal studies show skin tumors developing in mice after exposure to benzo[a]pyrene).

The cancer risks calculated above (i.e., systemic effects), therefore, will underestimate the cancer

risk posed by PAHs at the site (i.e., systemic and direct effects). The health and safety plan at

the site should, therefore, include provisions to minimize contact of workers with soil.

5.4.5 Risk from Multiple Chemicals

Assessing risk from mixtures of chemicals is the subject of several USEPA guidance

documents (USEPA, 1989 and USEPA, 2000). In general, there are three quantitative methods

for assessing risk from chemical mixtures:

• If there is data on a “sufficiently similar” mixture, use toxicologic data on the

characterized mixture;

• If chemicals have similar methods of toxicity and target organs, dose addition may be

used; and

83

• If chemicals have dissimilar methods of toxicity and target different organs, response

addition may be used.

There is no readily-available information on toxicological responses of a “sufficiently

similar mixture”. In this situation, dose addition or response addition may be used. USEPA

(2000) also allows for the performance of a qualitative risk assessment on the impact from

multiple chemicals if there is insufficient data to complete a quantitative risk assessment.

For non-carcinogenic effects of PAHs, a response addition approach was used. In

general, there are two broad approaches to generating an overall hazard index: sum all individual

hazard quotients irrespective of target organ, or sum individual hazard indices for chemicals that

have the same target organ. Given that the hazard quotient for dermal contact with arsenic

(without considering any other compounds) is greater than one (1), in order to be conservative,

hazard indices for inorganic and organic COCs were summed without considering the target

organ.

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a group of similar compounds, many of

which are carcinogenic. For this reason, a dose addition methodology was used to assess

carcinogenic risk posed by this group of compounds. This was done using the recommended

USEPA method of toxicologic equivalency factors (TEF), wherein the toxicity of each PAH is

compared to benzo[a]pyrene and the slope factor for benzo[a]pyrene is used as the toxicologic

standard. However, USEPA (1993) recommends only using the TEF methodology for

carcinogenic effects due to the lack of studies examining non-carcinogenic effects of PAHs. As

can be seen in Table 31, using this methodology for PAHs results in a carcinogenic risk of 8.44 x

10-6 (less than an unacceptable incremental cancer risk of 10

-4). Given that the cancer risk for

dermal contact with PAHs is two orders of magnitude greater than the cancer risk associated

with arsenic, in order to be conservative, cancer risks for inorganic and organic COCs were

summed without considering the target organ.

5.5 Inhalation of Outdoor Air – Volatile Compounds

5.5.1 Estimating Concentration of Chemicals in Air

The sampling program at the site analyzed the concentration of COCs in the soil. In

order to estimate the concentration of each volatile COC in the air, the volatilization factor is

used. The volatilization factor is the relationship between the concentration of a chemical in the

soil and the flux of the chemical into the air. Of the identified COCs, the following are

considered to pose a potential risk due to volatilization: mercury, acenaphthene, acenaphthylene,

anthracene, fluorene, 2-methylnaphthalene, naphthalene, phenanthrene and pyrene. Table 32

lists the volatile compounds examined during this portion of the risk assessment, the

volatilization factor (USEPA Mid Atlantic Risk Assessment, 2014) and the estimated

concentration of the COCs in the air.

Table 31. Dermal cancer risk for chemicals of concern.

Csoil or equivalent

concentration

(mg/kg)

Dermal

Absorption

fraction DAeventDAD

Slope

Factor

(Oral) ABSGI

Absorbed

slope factor

Dermal Cancer

Risk

Arsenic 183 0.03 1.65E-05 7.60E-06 0.0043 1 0.0043 3.27E-08

3.27E-08

Acenaphthene 0.133 0.13 5.19E-08 2.39E-08 7.3 1 7.3 1.75E-07

Anthracene 0.048 0.13 1.89E-08 8.71E-09 7.3 1 7.3 6.36E-08

Benz[a]anthracene 0.152 0.13 5.91E-08 2.73E-08 7.3 1 7.3 1.99E-07

Benzo[a]pyrene 1.274 0.13 4.97E-07 2.29E-07 7.3 1 7.3 1.67E-06

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.559 0.13 6.08E-07 2.80E-07 7.3 1 7.3 2.05E-06

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.011 0.13 4.17E-09 1.92E-09 7.3 1 7.3 1.40E-08

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.017 0.13 6.72E-09 3.10E-09 7.3 1 7.3 2.26E-08

Chrysene 0.093 0.13 3.63E-08 1.67E-08 7.3 1 7.3 1.22E-07

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2.860 0.13 1.12E-06 5.15E-07 7.3 1 7.3 3.76E-06

Fluoranthene 0.086 0.13 3.35E-08 1.54E-08 7.3 1 7.3 1.13E-07

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.061 0.13 2.36E-08 1.09E-08 7.3 1 7.3 7.95E-08

8.44E-06

8.48E-06

Dermal Cancer Risk (inorganic)

Dermal Cancer Risk (organic)

Total Dermal Cancer Risk

85

Table 32. Calculation of concentrations of volatile COCs in air.

Csoil

(mg/kg) Volatilization Factor (m3/kg) Cair (mg/m

3)

Mercury 33.45 2.56E+04 1.31E-03

Acenaphthene 12.34 1.20E+05 1.03E-04

Acenaphthylene 49.94 1.61E+05 3.10E-04

Anthracene 11.40 4.45E+05 2.56E-05

Fluorene 43.69 2.39E+05 1.83E-04

2-Methylnaphthalene 0.247 4.93E+04 5.01E-06

Naphthalene 8.426 3.94E+04 2.14E-04

Phenanthrene 367.3 5.48E+05 6.70E-04

Pyrene 515.6 2.02E+06 2.55E-04

5.5.2 Non-Cancer Effects

According to USEPA (2009a), the steps in estimating exposure concentration include

assessing exposure duration, exposure pattern, and exposure concentration. Exposure duration

for construction and excavation workers on the site will be sub-chronic. In the guidance, acute

exposure is defined as lasting 24 hours or less. Sub-chronic exposure is defined as repeated

exposures for more than 30 days up to approximately 10 percent of a human lifespan

(approximately 7 years). Chronic exposures are repeated exposures for more than 10 percent of

the human lifespan. The decision flow chart (Figure 2 in USEPA, 2009a), requires that sub-

chronic exposure concentrations are calculated if the repeated periods of exposure are at least as

frequent as a sub-chronic toxicity test (6 to 8 hours a day, 5 days/week). If the exposure

frequency is at least as frequent as a chronic toxicity test or an occupational study (6 to 8 hours a

day, 5 days a week, 50 weeks a year), then a chronic exposure concentration should be

calculated.

The exposure of construction and excavation workers at the site could be defined

(according to Figure 2, USEPA, 2009a) as either sub-chronic or chronic. The equation used to

calculate the exposure concentration for both these situations is the same (Equation 7).

EC = CA x ET x EF x ED Equation 7

AT

Where: EC = Exposure concentration (mg/m3)

CA = Contaminant concentration in air (mg/m3)

ET = Exposure time (hours/day)

EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)

ED = Exposure duration (years)

AT = Averaging time (days)

86

Concentration in air was calculated using volatilization factors (Section 5.5.1). The

exposure used in the calculations was 250 days per year for one year for eight hours a day. This

exposure scenario, which assumes that a worker is exposed 50 weeks/year and 5 days per week,

was chosen in order to be conservative; the actual exposure frequency (according to the

architect) will probably be less than a year for any individual working on site. The length of

time that the site will be under excavation is expected to be less than a year with the rest of the

two-year construction estimate being used for construction and finishing. As excavation is

completed and areas of the site are paved, the volatilization of volatile COCs would be reduced.

An averaging time of one year was used (USEPA, 2004).

The exposure concentration (EC) calculated for each volatile COC was compared to an

RfC value. For SVOCs with no defined RfC value, it is recommended that an RfC for a similar

PAH be used, therefore, the RfC value for naphthalene was used.

The hazard quotient for each volatile COC was calculated as:

HQ = EC / RfC Equation 8


EC = Exposure concentration (mg/m3)

RfC = Reference concentration (mg/m3)

In general, a hazard index greater than one (1) is considered to pose an unacceptable risk.

The non-cancer risks from inhalation exposure to COCs at the site are summarized in Table 33.

The COC with the highest calculated hazard quotient is mercury (hazard quotient 0.996).

Further discussion about the hazard indices calculated for the inhalation of volatile compounds is

in Section 5.8.1.

Table 33. Hazard quotients for volatile COCs - inhalation pathway.

CA

(mg/m3)

Exposure

Concentration (mg/m3)

Reference

Concentration

(mg/m3)

Hazard

quotient

Mercury 1.31E-03 2.98E-04 3.00E-04 9.96E-01

Hazard Index due to mercury 0.996

Acenaphthene 1.03E-04 2.35E-05 3.00E-03 7.83E-03

Acenaphthylene 3.10E-04 7.08E-05 3.00E-03 2.36E-02

Anthracene 2.47E-04 5.64E-05 3.00E-03 1.88E-02

Fluorene 1.83E-04 4.17E-05 3.00E-03 1.39E-02

2-Methylnaphthalene 5.01E-06 1.14E-06 3.00E-03 3.81E-04

Naphthalene 2.14E-04 4.88E-05 3.00E-03 1.63E-02

Phenanthrene 6.70E-04 1.53E-04 3.00E-03 5.10E-02

Pyrene 2.55E-04 5.83E-05 3.00E-03 1.94E-02

Hazard Index due to volatile SVOCs 0.15

87


According to USEPA (2009a), Equation 9 should be used to estimate the exposure

concentration for inhaled carcinogenic volatile COCs. Mercury was omitted from the estimation

of cancerous risks because it is not considered to be a human carcinogen.

EC = CA x ET x EF x ED Equation 9

AT

Where: EC = Exposure concentration (mg/m3)

CA = Contaminant concentration in air (mg/m3)

ET = Exposure time (hours/day)

EF = Exposure frequency (days/year)

ED = Exposure duration (years)

AT = Averaging time (days)

Concentration in air was calculated using volatilization factors (Section 5.5.1). The

exposure used in the calculations was 250 days per year for one year for eight hours a day. This






completed and areas of the site are paved, the volatilization of volatile COCs would be reduced.

A default averaging time of seventy years was used to assess cancer risks (USEPA, 2009a).

The inhalation cancer risk is calculated using the Inhalation Unit Risk (IUR) provided by

IRIS. As in Section 6.5.2, the IUR for naphthalene was used as the IUR for other volatile PAHs

due to the lack of derived IURs for these other chemicals. The inhalation cancer risk for each

carcinogenic COC was calculated as:

Inhalation Cancer Risk = EC x IUR Equation 10

Where EC = exposure concentration (mg/m3)

IUR = inhalation unit risk (mg/m3)-1

The inhalation cancer risks for each individual COC were then summed to give the site

inhalation cancer risk due to volatile compounds. In general, a cancer risk of greater than 10-4

is

considered to pose an unacceptable risk. The cancer risks from inhalation exposure to volatile

COCs at the site are summarized in Table 34. The total inhalation cancer risk for PAHs at the

site is 7.7 x 10-6

. Therefore, there is no carcinogenic risk due to inhalation of volatile COCs in

outdoor air.

88

Table 34. Cancer risks associated with the inhalation of volatilized COCs.

Cair

(mg/m3)

Exposure

Concentration

(mg/m3)

Inhalation

Unit Risk

(ug/m3)

Inhalation

Unit Risk

(mg/m3)

Inhalation

Cancer

Risk

Acenaphthene 1.03E-04 1.17E-05 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 3.99E-07

Acenaphthylene 3.10E-04 3.54E-05 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 1.20E-06

Anthracene 2.47E-04 2.82E-05 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 9.59E-07

Fluorene 1.83E-04 2.09E-05 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 7.10E-07

2-Methylnaphthalene 5.01E-06 1.14E-06 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 3.89E-08

Naphthalene 2.14E-04 2.44E-05 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 8.30E-07

Phenanthrene 6.70E-04 7.65E-05 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 2.60E-06

Pyrene 2.55E-04 2.91E-05 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 9.91E-07

Cancer Risk 7.73E-06

5.6 Inhalation of Outdoor Air – Particulates

5.6.1 Estimating Concentration of Chemicals as Particulates in Air

The sampling program at the site, analyzed the concentration of COCs in the soil. In order to

estimate the concentration of each COC in the air as particulates, the particulate emission factor

was used. The particulate emission factor was estimated to be 6.44 x 108, based on tables from

USEPA Mid Atlantic Risk Assessment (2014) (data from Cleveland, Ohio for a 5-acre site was

used). The estimated concentrations of particulates in fugitive dust from the site are provided in

Table 35. All COCs at the site were considered to be part of dust emissions from the site.

5.6.2 Non-Cancer Effects

According to USEPA (2009a), the steps in estimating exposure concentration include

assessing exposure duration, exposure pattern, and exposure concentration. Exposure duration

for construction and excavation workers on the site will be sub-chronic. In the guidance, acute

exposure is defined as lasting 24 hours or less; sub-chronic is defined as repeated exposures for

more than 30 days up to approximately 10 percent of a human lifespan (approximately 7 years),

and chronic exposures are repeated exposures for more than 10 percent of the human lifespan.

The decision flow chart (Figure 2 in USEPA, 2009a), requires that sub-chronic exposure

concentrations are calculated if the repeated periods of exposure are at least as frequent as a sub-

chronic toxicity test (6 to 8 hours a day, 5 days/week). If the exposure frequency is at least as

frequent as a chronic toxicity test or an occupational study (6 to 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, 50

weeks a year), then a chronic exposure concentration should be calculated.

89

Table 35. Calculation of concentrations of particulate COCs in air.

Csoil (mg/kg)

Particulate

Emission Factor

(m3/kg) CA (mg/m

3)

Aluminum 6305 6.44E+08 9.79E-06

Antimony 9.582 6.44E+08 1.49E-08

Arsenic 160.4 6.44E+08 2.49E-07

Barium 796.3 6.44E+08 1.24E-06

Beryllium 0.497 6.44E+08 7.72E-10

Cadmium 3.186 6.44E+08 4.95E-09

Chromium 85.04 6.44E+08 1.32E-07

Lead 989.9 6.44E+08 1.54E-06

Manganese 555.4 6.44E+08 8.62E-07

Mercury 33.45 6.44E+08 5.19E-08

Selenium 4.806 6.44E+08 7.46E-09

Vanadium 17.85 6.44E+08 2.77E-08

Zinc 1214 6.44E+08 1.89E-06

Acenaphthene 12.34 6.44E+08 1.92E-08

Acenaphthylene 49.94 6.44E+08 7.75E-08

Anthracene 110 6.44E+08 1.71E-07

Benz[a]anthracene 270.9 6.44E+08 4.21E-07

Benzo[a]pyrene 238.8 6.44E+08 3.71E-07

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 271.2 6.44E+08 4.21E-07

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 129.3 6.44E+08 2.01E-07

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 116.1 6.44E+08 1.80E-07

Chrysene 245.3 6.44E+08 3.81E-07

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 38.23 6.44E+08 5.94E-08

Fluoranthene 631.5 6.44E+08 9.81E-07

Fluorene 43.69 6.44E+08 6.78E-08

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 116.3 6.44E+08 1.81E-07

2-Methylnaphthalene 0.247 6.44E+08 3.84E-10

Naphthalene 8.426 6.44E+08 1.31E-08

Phenanthrene 367.3 6.44E+08 5.70E-07

Pyrene 515.6 6.44E+08 8.01E-07

90

The exposure of construction and excavation workers at the site could be defined

(according to Figure 2, USEPA, 2009a) as either sub-chronic or chronic. The equation used to

calculate the exposure concentration for both these situations is the same (Equation 7).

Concentration in air was calculated using particulate emission factors (Section 5.6.1).

The exposure used in the calculations was 250 days per year for one year for eight hours a day.

An averaging time of one year was used (USEPA, 2004). This exposure scenario, which

assumes that a worker is exposed 50 weeks/year and 5 days per week, was chosen in order to be

conservative; the actual exposure frequency (according to the architect) will probably be less

than a year for any individual working on site. The length of time that the site will be under

excavation is expected to be less than a year with the rest of the two-year construction estimate

being used for construction and finishing. As excavation is completed and areas of the site are

paved, the emission of particulate COCs as dust would be reduced. Additionally, dust mitigation

during construction and excavation will further reduce the emission of COCs as particulates.

The exposure concentration (EC) calculated for each COC was compared to an RfC

value. For volatile SVOCs with no defined RfC value, the RfC value for naphthalene was used

(acenaphthene, acenaphthylene, anthracene, fluorene, 3-methylnaphthalene, phenanthrene and

pyrene). A proposed RfC of 2x10-6

(USEPA, 2012-Draft Guidance) was used for

benzo[a]pyrene and the remainder of the PAH compounds in this risk assessment. USEPA does

not recommend a RfC for arsenic, barium and vanadium, so arsenic, barium and vanadium were

excluded from this risk assessment. OSHA set the safe limit for aluminum dusts at 5 mg/m3,

however, there is no RfC for aluminum. The estimated exposure concentration for aluminum

dusts is 9.8 x 10-6

mg/m3, therefore, aluminum was therefore omitted from this portion of the risk

assessment because the concentration in the air at the site is six orders of magnitudes less than

the OSHA limit for exposure (Table 35). Similarly, zinc was omitted from the calculation – the

OSHA PEL for zinc is 1 mg/m3, and the concentration estimated at the site is 1.9 x 10

-6 mg/m

3

(Table 35). The RfC for antimony trioxide was used to approximate exposure risks from

antimony. A draft RfC, proposed by USEPA in 1999 was used as a comparison point for

particulate cadmium concentrations, even though IRIS does not currently provide an RfC for

cadmiuim. For selenium, the California EPA chronic reference exposure level of 0.02 mg/m3

was used as an RfC value. The lines in Table 36 for cadmium and selenium are highlighted in

gray because of the additional uncertainty associated with these values.

The hazard quotient for each volatile COC was calculated as:

HQ = EC / RfC Equation 11


EC = Exposure concentration (mg/m3)

RfC = Reference concentration (mg/m3)

The hazard quotients for each individual COC were then summed to give the site hazard

index. In general, a hazard index greater than one (1) is considered to pose an unacceptable risk.

The non-cancer risks from inhalation exposure to COCs at the site are summarized in Table 36.

91

The hazard index for the inhalation of non-carcinogenic particulates is 0.373, below the

recommended hazard index of one (1).

Table 36. Hazard quotients for particulate COCs - inhalation pathway.

Cair

(mg/m3)

Exposure

Concentration

(mg/m3)

Reference

Concentration

(mg/m3) Hazard Quotient

Antimony 1.49E-08 3.40E-09 2.00E-04 1.70E-05

Beryllium 7.72E-10 1.76E-10 2.00E-05 8.81E-06

Cadmium 4.95E-09 1.13E-09 7.00E-04 1.61E-06

Chromium 1.32E-07 3.01E-08 3.00E-04 3.76E-06

Manganese 8.62E-07 1.97E-07 5.00E-05 3.94E-03

Mercury 5.19E-08 1.19E-08 3.00E-04 3.95E-05

Selenium 7.46E-09 1.70E-09 2.00E-02 8.52E-08

Acenaphthene 1.92E-08 4.37E-09 3.00E-03 1.46E-06

Acenaphthylene 7.75E-08 1.77E-08 3.00E-03 5.90E-06

Anthracene 1.71E-07 3.90E-08 3.00E-03 1.30E-05

Benz[a]anthracene 4.21E-07 9.60E-08 2.00E-06 4.80E-02

Benzo[a]pyrene 3.71E-07 8.47E-08 2.00E-06 4.23E-02

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 4.21E-07 9.61E-08 2.00E-06 4.81E-02

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 2.01E-07 4.58E-08 2.00E-06 2.29E-02

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 1.80E-07 4.12E-08 2.00E-06 2.06E-02

Chrysene 3.81E-07 8.70E-08 2.00E-06 4.35E-02

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 5.94E-08 1.36E-08 2.00E-06 6.78E-03

Fluoranthene 9.81E-07 2.24E-07 2.00E-06 1.12E-01

Fluorene 6.78E-08 1.55E-08 3.00E-03 5.16E-06

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 1.81E-07 4.12E-08 2.00E-06 2.06E-02

2-Methylnaphthalene 3.84E-10 8.76E-11 3.00E-03 2.92E-08

Naphthalene 1.31E-08 2.99E-09 3.00E-03 9.96E-07

Phenanthrene 5.70E-07 1.30E-07 3.00E-03 4.34E-05

Pyrene 8.01E-07 1.83E-07 3.00E-03 6.09E-05

Hazard Index 0.369


According to USEPA (2009a), Equation 9 should be used to estimate the exposure

concentration for inhaled carcinogenic particulate COCs. Aluminum, antimony, barium,

manganese, mercury, selenium, vanadium, zinc, acenaphthene, acenaphthylene, anthracene,

benzo[g,h,i]perylene, fluoranthene, fluorene, 2-methylnaphthalene, phenanthrene and pyrene

92

were omitted from the estimation of cancerous risks because these chemicals are not considered

to be human carcinogens when inhaled.

Concentration in air was calculated using particulate emission factors (Section 5.6.1).

The exposure used in the calculations was 250 days per year for one year for eight hours a day.

A default averaging time of seventy years was used to assess cancer risks (USEPA, 2009a). This






completed and areas of the site are paved, the emission of particulate COCs would be reduced.

The inhalation cancer risk was calculated using the Inhalation Unit Risk (IUR) provided

by IRIS, where available. When data from IRIS was not available for the IUR, the values from

USEPA Mid Atlantic Risk Assessment (2014) tables were used (Table 22). The inhalation

cancer risk for each carcinogenic COC was calculated using Equation 10.

The inhalation cancer risks for each individual COC were then summed to give the site

inhalation cancer risk due to volatile compounds. In general, a cancer risk of greater than 10-4

is

considered to pose an unacceptable risk. The cancer risks from inhalation exposure to volatile

COCs at the site are summarized in Table 37. The total inhalation cancer risk for particulates at

the site is 3.75 x 10-7

. Therefore, there is no carcinogenic risk due to inhalation of particulate

COCs in outdoor air.

Table 37. Cancer risks associated with the inhalation of particulate COCs.

Cair

(mg/m3)

Exposure

Concentration

(mg/m3)

Inhalation

Unit Risk

(ug/m3)-1

Inhalation

Unit Risk

(mg/m3)-1

Inhalation

Cancer Risk

Arsenic 2.49E-07 2.84E-08 4.30E-03 4.30E+00 1.22E-07

Beryllium 7.72E-10 8.81E-11 2.40E-03 2.40E+00 2.11E-10

Cadmium 4.95E-09 5.65E-10 1.80E-03 1.80E+00 1.02E-09

Chromium 1.32E-07 1.51E-08 1.20E-02 1.20E+01 1.81E-07

Benz[a]anthracene 4.21E-07 4.80E-08 1.10E-04 1.10E-01 5.28E-09

Benzo[a]pyrene 3.71E-07 4.23E-08 1.10E-03 1.10E+00 4.66E-08

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 4.21E-07 4.81E-08 1.10E-04 1.10E-01 5.29E-09

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 1.80E-07 2.06E-08 1.10E-04 1.10E-01 2.26E-09

Chrysene 3.81E-07 4.35E-08 1.10E-05 1.10E-02 4.78E-10

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 5.94E-08 6.78E-09 1.20E-03 1.20E+00 8.13E-09

Indeno[1,2,3-

cd]pyrene 1.81E-07 2.06E-08 1.10E-04 1.10E-01 2.27E-09

Naphthalene 1.31E-08 1.49E-09 3.40E-05 3.40E-02 5.08E-11

3.75E-07

93

5.7 Uncertainty Associated with Inhalation Risk Analysis

5.7.1 Calculation of Concentrations in Air

Extrapolating from soil concentrations introduces uncertainty into the calculations.

Volatilization from soil into air was estimated using volatilization factors, which are not always

readily available. There is also uncertainty in the estimation of the particulate emission factor.

The inhalation risk assessment could be refined (and uncertainty reduced) by measuring ambient

concentrations of COCs during construction and excavation.

5.7.2 Calculation of Exposure Concentrations

The exposure concentrations calculated for chronic and sub-chronic exposure do not

account for short time periods during which workers may be exposed to elevated concentrations

of COCs (for example, during the excavation of a “hot spot”). Exposure concentrations are also

dependent on the exposure time. Discussions with the architect led to the conservative

assumption that workers would be exposed to the soil for no more than a year. In reality, the

expected exposure is likely to be less than a year for any individual contractor. Contractors

involved with the installation of utilities are expected to be onsite for less than three months.

The foundations to support the building are expected to take approximately four months to

install. Once the site has utilities and the base of construction completed, the area of the site

outside the footprint of the building is to be paved, limiting worker’s exposure to inhaled

volatiles and particulates. If adequate dust mitigation methods are incorporated into the site’s

health and safety plan, the concentration of particulates in the air would be further reduced.

5.7.3 Toxicity Assessment

Inhalation reference concentrations have not been developed by USEPA for all COCs at

this site. The use of OSHA standards and draft USEPA RfCs to assess dermal exposure

introduces uncertainty into the toxicity assessment.

5.7.4 Estimating Carcinogenic Risks

For high exposures (those which have risks greater than 10-2

), the inhalation unit risk is

not appropriate to use. However, the greatest risks documented during this risk assessment were

on the order of 10-7

(for arsenic and chromium), so use of the IUR does not introduce excess

uncertainty.

5.7.5 Risk from Multiple Chemicals

Assessing risk from mixtures of chemicals is the subject of several USEPA guidance

documents (USEPA, 1989 and USEPA 2000). In general, there are three quantitative methods

for assessing risk from chemical mixtures:

94

• If there is data on a “sufficiently similar” mixture, use toxicologic data on the

characterized mixture;

• If chemicals have similar methods of toxicity and target organs, dose addition may be

used; and

• If chemicals have dissimilar methods of toxicity and target different organs, response

addition may be used.

There is no readily available information on toxicological responses of a “sufficiently

similar mixture”. In this situation, dose addition or response addition may be used. USEPA

(2000) also allows for the performance of a qualitative risk assessment on the impact from

multiple chemicals if there is insufficient data to complete a quantitative risk assessment.

5.7.5.1 Inhalation of Volatile Chemicals

Two distinct groups of chemicals contribute hazard quotients to the total risk posed by

the inhalation of volatile compounds: mercury and volatile PAHs. All volatile PAHs were

assumed to have the same mode of action and potency at naphthalene. The critical effects

caused by naphthalene (according to IRIS) are nasal effects, including “hyperplasia and

metaphasia in respiratory and olfactory epithelium, respectively”. However, the critical effects

of the inhalation of mercury are “hand tremor, increases in memory disturbance, slight

subjective and objective evidence of autonomic dysfunction”. Therefore, volatile PAHs impact

the lungs and nose, while mercury impacts the nervous system. Given these two distinct modes

of action, it is not necessarily appropriate to sum the hazard indices across the target organs.


which are carcinogenic. While an explicit dose addition methodology (using TEFs) was used in

Section 5.4.3 for assessing the carcinogenic risk associated with dermal exposure to PAHs,

inhalation exposure to volatile PAHs used an implicit dose addition methodology. That is, the

inhalation unit risks provided for the PAHs were scaled from the IUR for benzo[a]pyrene. As


10-6

(less than the target incremental cancer risk of 10-4

).

5.7.5.2 Inhalation of Particulate Chemicals

The total hazard index posed by exposure to particulate COCs is 0.369, regardless of

target organ. This is less than the target hazard index of one (1). Therefore, no risk is posed to

construction and excavation workers by particulate COCs.


which are carcinogenic. While an explicit dose addition methodology (using TEFs) was used in

Section 5.4.3 for assessing the carcinogenic risk associated with dermal exposure to PAHs,

inhalation exposure to volatile PAHs used an implicit dose addition methodology. That is, the

inhalation unit risks provided for the PAHs were scaled from the IUR for benzo[a]pyrene. As


95

10-8

(less than an unacceptable incremental cancer risk of 10-4

). In order to be conservative, total

cancer risk to particulates were summed without considering the target organ. This resulted in a

total incremental cancer risk of 3.75 x 10-7 (less than an unacceptable incremental cancer risk of

10-4

). Therefore, there is no carcinogenic risk due to inhalation of particulate COCs in outdoor

air.

5.8 Summary of Total Risk to Construction and Excavation Workers

5.8.1 Non-Cancer Risks (Dermal Plus Inhalation)

Table 38 shows the non-carcinogenic risks posed to construction and excavation workers,

separated by target organ. The target hazard index of one (1) is exceeded for the nervous system

and blood.

The COCs that target the nervous system include mercury, aluminum and manganese.

Inhalation of volatile mercury and dermal contact with aluminum contribute over 97 percent of

the risk posed to the nervous system. The dermal risk can be reduced by wearing gloves and

long sleeves. The dermal risk can be further reduced if employees shower immediately on

finishing work each day because the dermal risk assessment process considers that soil is in

contact with the skin for 24 hours each day. Even protective dermal measures may not reduce

the hazard index below the USEPA threshold of one (1) due to the risk posed by the inhalation of

mercury.

It is important to note that the inhalation risk assessment was conducted using

concentrations of mercury reported in the soil (as opposed to soil gas) (Section 5.7.1). Risk

assessment performed using soil gas measurements (as opposed to the soil values used here)

would provide more certainty as to whether this pathway is of concern. Alternatively,

administrative controls could be used to reduce the exposure to mercury vapor, including rotating

workers to reduce the time of exposure at the site. Preliminary calculations indicate that total

exposure for an adult worker should not exceed 200 days. Given that the architect did not

expect individual construction teams to be onsite for more than six months, this exposure period

should not negatively affect construction at the site.

The COCs that target blood include antimony, arsenic, zinc and fluorene. Dermal contact

with arsenic contributes over 98 percent of the risk to the blood. This risk can be reduced to

acceptable levels by providing employees with gloves and having workers wear long sleeves.

This risk can be further reduced if employees shower immediately on finishing work each day

because the dermal risk assessment process considers that soil is in contact with the skin for 24

hours each day.

96

Table 38. Total non-carcinogenic risks to construction and excavation workers.

Target Organ Chemical of Concern Pathway Hazard Quotient

Nervous System Mercury Inhalation-volatile 9.96E-01

Aluminum Dermal 1.10E-01

Manganese Dermal 3.00E-02

Manganese Inhalation-particulate 3.94E-03

Mercury Inhalation-particulate 3.95E-05

Hazard Index - Nervous System 1.14

Nose and Lungs Volatile PAHs Inhalation-volatile 1.50E-01

2-Methylnaphthalene Dermal 6.00E-04

Volatile PAHs Inhalation-particulate 1.31E-04

Antimony Inhalation-particulate 1.70E-05

Beryllium Inhalation-particulate 8.81E-06

Chromium Inhalation-particulate 3.76E-06

Hazard Index - Nose and Lungs 0.15

Blood Antimony Dermal 1.10E-06

Arsenic Dermal 1.80E+00

Zinc Dermal 3.10E-02

Fluorene Dermal 1.50E-05

Hazard Index – Blood 1.83

Kidneys Barium Dermal 1.90E-02

Cadmium Dermal 4.80E-08

Pyrene Dermal 4.40E-05

Cadmium Inhalation-particulate 1.61E-06

Hazard index - Kidneys 0.02

Liver Selenium Dermal 1.10E-05

Acenaphthene Dermal 5.10E-06

Selenium Inhalation-particulate 8.52E-08

Fluoranthene Dermal 3.40E-04

Hazard Index – Liver 3.56E-04

Intestines Beryllium Dermal 1.60E-06

Hair Vanadium Dermal 0.03

Weight loss Naphthalene Dermal 8.50E-05

Reproductive System Non-volatile PAHs Inhalation-particulate 0.37

Total Hazard Index-all target organs 3.54

97

5.8.2 Carcinogenic Risk (Dermal and Inhalation)

The total carcinogenic risk across all pathways (regardless of target organ) is 1.66 x 10-5

(Table 39). This value is less than the acceptable incremental carcinogenic risk of 10-4

recommended by USEPA. Therefore, no carcinogenic risks are posed to construction and

excavation workers at the site.

Table 39. Total carcinogenic risks to construction and excavation workers.

Incremental Carcinogenic Risk

Dermal 8.48E-06

Inhalation volatile 7.73E-06

Inhalation particulate 3.75E-07

Total Risk 1.66E-05

5.8.3 Total Risk (Dermal and Inhalation)

Based on the concentrations of COCs in the soil, construction/excavation workers are

expected to have an increased dermal risk due to arsenic. This risk can be managed by requiring

workers (as part of a health and safety plan) to wear gloves and long sleeves. Workers should

also be reminded that showering after work will further reduce their exposure risk.

In addition, construction/excavation workers are expected to have an unacceptable

increased inhalation risk due to mercury if they are onsite fulltime more than 200 days. This risk

can be managed (as part of a health and safety plan) by limiting either the number of hours

and/or the number of days of exposure for the worker.

5.9 Indoor Air Risk Assessment

5.9.1 Calculating Exposure Concentrations

Concentrations of COCs in indoor air in the proposed jail, proposed jail and possible

expansion, and proposed Sheriff’s Office were estimated using the Johnson and Ettinger (1991)

model. Version 3.1 of the model was used (Environmental Quality Management, 2004). COCs

that are considered to be “sufficiently toxic” and “sufficiently volatile” were included in this

portion of the risk assessment. Chemicals are considered to be “sufficiently toxic” if the non-

cancer hazard index of the vapor concentration of the pure chemical is greater than one (1) or if

the vapor concentration of the pure chemical creates an incremental life time cancer risk of more

than 1 x 10-6

. Chemicals with a Henry’s law constant of greater than 1 x 10-5

atm-m3/mole were

considered to be “sufficiently volatile” (Environmental Quality Management, 2004). Therefore,

the COCs included in this portion of the risk assessment were acenaphthene,

benzo[b]fluoranthene, chrysene, fluorene, mercury, 2-methylnaphthalene, naphthalene and

pyrene.

98

Inputs to the Johnson and Ettinger model can be grouped as chemical-specific, soil,

building, and exposure scenarios. Default chemical input parameters were used as provided in

the look-up tables within the Johnson and Ettinger model and concentrations of COC were used

from Tables 26 and 27. Input values used for all model runs pertaining to soil conditions at the

site are listed in Table 40. Parameters describing the proposed buildings are provided in Table

41. The three scenarios investigated were for the proposed jail; the proposed jail and possible

expansion; and the Sheriff’s Office. Figure 15 shows the location of the proposed jail (red

outline), possible expansion area (green outline), and Sheriff’s Office (light pink outline on the

west side of the site).

Exposure scenarios were investigated for jail inmates and adults working at the facilities

(Table 42). For the purposes of this assessment, residents were assumed to be exposed to the air

inside the building for one year with continuous exposure 365 days a year. (According to

Fairfield County personnel, the average stay in the Fairfield County jail is 14 days. However, for

misdemeanors under ORC 2929.24, there are times when sentences can add to 360 days.

Further, if there is a felony 5 charge, which is rare in Fairfield County, the time could exceed a

year depending on multiple factors. Reportedly, the longest duration recently has been 18

months.) For adult workers in the proposed jail and Sheriff’s office, the exposure time was 25

years (USEPA recommended value for commercial/industrial exposure scenarios) with exposure

250 days a year (50 weeks a year, 5 days a week).

5.9.2 Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Risks

Results from the Johnson and Ettinger model are summarized in Table 43. Scenarios

with a hazard quotient greater than 0.1 are highlighted in orange and those with a hazard quotient

greater than 1 are highlighted in yellow. Full result outputs are provided in Appendix N.

99

Table 40. Input parameters for the Johnson and Ettinger model - soil parameters.

Parameter Input Value Units Rationale

Average soil temperature 10 oC Default

Depth below grade to bottom

of enclosed floor space 15 cm

Model setting for slab on grade

scenario

Depth below bottom of grade

to top of contamination 20 cm

Must be greater than Depth below

grade to bottom of enclosed floor

space

Depth below bottom of grade

to bottom of contamination 360 cm Based on depth of fill in borings

Thickness of soil stratum A 20 cm

soil stratum total depth must

equal depth below grade to top of

contamination

Soil stratum A SCS soil type LS Based on data from borings

Stratum A soil dry bulk density 1.62 g/cm3 Model default for LS soil type

Stratum A soil total porosity 0.39 Model default for LS soil type

Stratum A soil water filled

porosity 0.076 cm3/cm

3 Model default for LS soil type

Stratum A soil organic carbon

fraction 0.002 Model default for LS soil type

100

Table 41. Input parameters for the Johnson and Ettinger model - building parameters.

Parameter Scenario

Input

Value Units Rationale

Enclosed space floor

thickness 10 cm Model default

Soil-building

pressure differential 40 g/cm-s

2 Model default

Enclosed floor space

length

Proposed jail 7161 cm Based on area weighted

average of one story and

two story areas of the

proposed building

Proposed jail and expansion 8258 cm

Proposed Sheriff's Office 4838 cm

Enclosed floor space

width

Proposed jail 7161 cm Based on area weighted

average of one story and

two story areas of the

proposed building

Proposed jail and expansion 8258 cm

Proposed Sheriff's office 4838 cm

Enclosed space

height

Proposed jail 538 cm Based on the area of the

proposed building Proposed jail and expansion 555 cm

Proposed Sheriff's office 305 cm

Floor-wall seam

crack width 0.1 cm Model default

Indoor air exchange

rate 1 1/hr

Data from consultant

engineers designing the

HVAC system

Table 42. Input parameters for the Johnson and Ettinger model - exposure scenarios.

Parameter Scenario Input Value Units Rationale

Averaging

time for

carcinogens

70 years US EPA default

Averaging

time for non-

carcinogens

Adult resident 1 years Averaging time equals

exposure duration for non-

carcinogens Adult worker 25 years

Exposure

duration

Adult resident 1 years See text

Adult worker 25 years

Exposure

frequency

Adult resident 365 days/year See text

Adult worker 250 days/year

Table 43. Results from the Johnson and Ettinger Model.

Parameter Scenario

Incremental risk

from vapor

intrusion to

indoor air

(carcinogen)

Hazard quotient

from vapor

intrusion to

indoor air (non-

carcinogenic)

Acenaphthene Residential proposed jail 9.48E-05

Residential proposed jail and expansion 7.97E-05

Worker proposed jail 6.49E-05

Worker proposed jail and expansion 5.46E-05

Worker proposed Sheriff's office 1.69E-04

Benzo[b]fluoranthene Residential proposed jail 3.15E-11



Worker proposed jail and expansion 4.54E-10Worker proposed Sheriff's office 1.41E-09

Chrysene Residential proposed jail 1.25E-12



Worker proposed jail and expansion 1.80E-11Worker proposed Sheriff's office 5.57E-11

Fluorene Residential proposed jail 1.05E-04





Mercury Residential proposed jail 3.66

Residential proposed jail and expansion 3.08

Worker proposed jail 2.51

Worker proposed jail and expansion 2.11

Worker proposed Sheriff's office 6.53

2-Methylnaphthalene Residential proposed jail 4.72E-05





Naphthalene Residential proposed jail 6.61E-02





Pyrene Residential proposed jail 1.39E-05





102

As shown in Table 43, naphthalene has a hazard quotient of 0.118 for workers in the

proposed Sheriff’s office. However, the hazard quotient for mercury is an order of magnitude

higher. In all five scenarios investigated, the hazard quotient for mercury exceeded one (1).

These calculations are based on the analysis of bulk soil, which introduces increased uncertainty

in the risk analysis. Ohio EPA (2010b) recommends further data collection (including soil gas

sampling and analysis) prior to a definitive determination of risk.

Based on preliminary evaluation of concentrations of mercury and naphthalene in the

soil, measurements of concentrations of these chemicals of concern in soil gas have been

initiated to determine if vapor intrusion into the new building will pose an increased health risk

for workers and residents. If soil gas measurements show no increased exposure, then no

measures are needed to protect the residents and workers. If soil gas measurements indicate an

increased exposure, then measures to interrupt the pathway must be employed (e.g. installation

of a physical barrier below the slab with passive or active air removal).

5.9.3 Uncertainty Associated with Indoor Air Risk Analysis

The Johnson and Ettinger model is a screening model that takes into account both

convective and diffusive mechanisms and estimates the transport of contaminant vapors from

soils into buildings located immediately above the contaminated soil. The Johnson and Ettinger

model is a one-dimensional analytical model that takes into account contaminant attenuation as

contaminants move from soil into soil gas into buildings. There is limited experimental data to

assist in the definition of input parameters. Therefore, unless site-specific data were available,

recommended model defaults were used to create a conservative estimate of vapor concentration.

There is greater uncertainty associated with calculating indoor air concentrations of contaminants

when starting from soil analytical data than when using soil gas data. To account for this

increased uncertainty, the hazard quotient was compared to 0.1 [instead of the usual value of one

(1)], as recommended by Ohio EPA (2010b).

In addition to the uncertainty associated with soil analytical information, the Johnson and

Ettinger model has the following assumptions/limitations (according to Environmental Quality

Management, 2004):

1. “Contaminant vapors enter the structure primarily through cracks and openings in the

walls and foundation.

2. Convective transport occurs primarily within the building zone of influence and vapor

velocities decrease rapidly with increasing distance from the structure.

3. Diffusion dominates vapor transport between the source of contamination and the

building zone of influence.

4. All vapors originating from below the building will enter the building unless the floor and

walls are perfect vapor barriers.

103

5. All soil properties in any horizontal plane are homogenous.

6. The contaminant is homogenously distributed within the zone of contamination.

7. The areal extent of contamination is greater than that of the building floor in contact with

the soil.

8. Vapor transport occurs in the absence of convective water movement within the soil

column (i.e., evaporation of infiltration), and in the absence of mechanical dispersion.

9. The model does not account for transformation processes (e.g., biodegradation,

hydrolysis, etc.).

10. The soil layer in contact with the structure floor and walls is isotropic with respect to

permeability.

11. Both the building ventilation rate and the difference in dynamic pressure between the

interior of the structure and the soil surface are constant values.”

Despite these assumptions and inherent limitations of the Johnson and Ettinger model,

the model results have compared favorably to experimental case histories and three-dimensional

numerical modeling of radon transport into homes (Ohio EPA, 2010b). The recommended use

of the Johnson and Ettinger model is to identify sites that may require further assessment with

respect to the indoor air pathway. The model should be used only to assess whether a risk-

exposure level may be exceeded at the site. It should not be used to predict the exact

concentrations of contaminants in indoor air at a facility.

5.10 Risk Assessment for Lead

5.10.1 Adult Lead Methodology

Risks due to exposure to lead are not modeled in the same manner as other chemicals

because it does not appear to have a threshold exposure level (i.e., the USEPA does not consider

the use of RfD or RfC values to be appropriate). The generally-accepted methodology for

assessing exposure to lead is the comparison of estimated blood lead concentrations to a

reference level of 10 µg/dl.

The USEPA’s recommended model for evaluating blood lead concentrations in non-

residential adult exposure scenarios is the Adult Lead Methodology (ALM). The ALM model is

a tool to estimate the concentration of lead in the blood of non-residential adults exposed to lead

in the environment. ProUCL was used to calculate the most appropriate UCL for the site data

(Appendix O).

The maximum depth of excavation expected by the architects is six feet. Therefore,

exposure to construction and excavation workers will be limited to the top six feet of soil. To be

conservative, the analytical data for the top eight feet were used in the risk assessment for lead

104

exposure. Summary statistics for lead in the top eight feet of the soil are provided in Table 44.

Lead does not volatilize readily, and, therefore, exposure to particulate matter containing lead is

the major exposure pathway at the site.

Table 44. Statistical summary of lead concentration data in soils at the site (0-8 feet).

Number of Data points 14

Number of Detects 14

Mean (mg/kg) 256

Standard Deviation (mg/kg) 480.7

UCL used Lognormal - 99% Chebyshev (mean, sd)

UCL (mg/kg) 1534

Maximum (mg/kg) 1600

Minimum (mg/kg) 5.9

Recommended defaults were used for input parameters into the ALM (Table 45) and

defaults were only adjusted when site-specific data was available, as recommended by USEPA

(2003b). The “ingestion rate” of soil containing lead is defaulted to 0.05 g/day, but this default

represents occupational exposure indoors. For this assessment, the Ohio EPA Voluntary Action

Program-recommended ingestion rate for construction workers was used (0.2 g/day). To retain

consistency with other occupational risk assessment performed at this site (see previous

sections), an exposure frequency of 250 days was used. Parameters that were altered based on

data from the site are highlighted in orange. NHANES III input data (for geometric standard

deviation and baseline lead blood concentrations) were used (USEPA 2009b).

The ALM calculated a geometric mean blood lead concentration of 11.6 µg/dl. This

result is higher than the target blood lead concentration level of 10 µg/dl. When this situation

occurs, construction worker exposure is subject to 29CFR 1926.62 (Section 5.10.3).

5.10.2 Assumptions of the Adult Lead Methodology

Like any model, the ALM makes certain assumptions. It assumes that blood

concentrations of lead for an exposed adult are the sum of starting blood lead concentration and

an expected increase in blood lead concentration due to the site. The methodology relates lead

uptake at a site to the concentration of lead in the top layers of soil (i.e., exposure to dusts). It

assumes that uptake through volatilization is minimal. The distribution of blood lead

concentrations can be approximated using a log-normal model (USEPA, 2003b). The

methodology predicts the concentration of lead in the blood of pregnant women and a developing

fetus. However, this methodology is also considered to be protective of adult male workers at

the site.

Table 45. Calculations of blood lead concentrations (PbBs) using ALM.

U.S. EPA Technical Review Workgroup for Lead, Adult Lead Committee

Version date 6/21/09

Variable Units

GSDi and PbBo from Analysis of NHANES

1999-2004

PbS ug/g or ppm 1534

Rfetal/maternal -- 0.9

BKSF ug/dL per

ug/day0.4

GSDi -- 2.1

PbB0 ug/dL 1.5

IRS g/day 0.200

IRS+D g/day --

WS -- --

KSD -- --

AFS, D -- 0.12

EFS, D days/yr 250

ATS, D days/yr 365

PbBadult PbB of adult worker, geometric mean ug/dL 11.6

PbBfetal, 0.95 95th percentile PbB among fetuses of adult workers ug/dL 35.3

PbBt Target PbB level of concern (e.g., 10 ug/dL) ug/dL 10.0

P(PbBfetal > PbBt) Probability that fetal PbB > PbBt, assuming lognormal distribution % 52.3%

Description of Variable

Soil lead concentration

Fetal/maternal PbB ratio

Biokinetic Slope Factor

Geometric standard deviation PbB

Baseline PbB

Averaging time (same for soil and dust)

Soil ingestion rate (including soil-derived indoor dust)

Total ingestion rate of outdoor soil and indoor dust

Weighting factor; fraction of IRS+D ingested as outdoor soil

Mass fraction of soil in dust

Absorption fraction (same for soil and dust)

Exposure frequency (same for soil and dust)

106

5.10.3 Managing Risks Due to Lead Exposure

Because the ALM predicts a mean blood concentration of greater than 10 µg/dl, worker

exposure is subject to 29 CFR 1926.62. 29 CFR 1926.62 states:

“1926.62(a) Scope. This section applies to all construction work where an employee may

be occupationally exposed to lead. All construction work excluded from coverage in the general

industry standard for lead by 29 CFR 1910.1025(a)(2) is covered by this standard. Construction

work is defined as work for construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and

decorating. It includes but is not limited to the following:

1926.62(a)(1) Demolition or salvage of structures where lead or materials containing

lead are present;

1926.62(a)(2) Removal or encapsulation of materials containing lead;

1926.62(a)(3) New construction, alteration, repair, or renovation of structures,

substrates, or portions thereof, that contain lead, or materials containing lead;

1926.62(a)(4) Installation of products containing lead;

1926.62(a)(5) Lead contamination/emergency cleanup;

1926.62(a)(6) Transportation, disposal, storage, or containment of lead or materials

containing lead on the site or location at which construction activities are

performed, and

1926.62(a)(7) Maintenance operations associated with the construction activities

described in this paragraph.”

These OSHA regulations require that employers with workers who will be occupationally

exposed to lead must determine whether an employee is exposed to levels of lead above the

action level of 30 µg/m3. The initial determination must be made using onsite air monitoring as

if the employee is not wearing a respirator. If initial monitoring shows that the action is not

exceeded, then no further air monitoring is necessary. If this initial monitoring shows that an

employee may be exposed to levels of lead above the action level, then an air monitoring

program must be established.

Regardless of the initial onsite monitoring, because the model indicates an increased

worker risk onsite, employers are required to develop a written compliance plan under OSHA.

This plan includes engineering, administrative and work practice controls to minimize the

exposure of employees to lead. Employees exposed to lead in the work place are also required to

participate in a medical surveillance program. Blood concentrations of lead above 50 µg/dl

warrant increased monitoring and temporary medical removal with economic protection.

107

However, this plan only needs to be implemented if the initial onsite air monitoring exceeds the

action level.

Lead is not readily volatile and the major risk at this site is from airborne particulates

from the subsurface fill. Measures to reduce dust should reduce the risk posed by lead at the site.

Lead exposure at this site will be of concern after removal of the existing asphalt and continue

until the site is covered with new asphalt. During this phase of construction, initial lead

concentrations in the air should be determined to ensure workers are not exposed to levels in

excess of 30 µg/m3. If levels exceed 30 µg/m

3, then contractors must take steps to safeguard

employees on the site.

108

SECTION 6

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

6.1 Introduction

As part of this project, it was necessary to determine what, if any, regulations were

applicable to future site activities based on the presence and characteristics of the fill materials.

These regulations would then inform future actions and activities at the site with regard to soil

management. As part of this process, we evaluated regulations primarily enforced by many

divisions of Ohio EPA. Our evaluation was based on conditions encountered during our

investigation and other site-specific geotechnical and Phase 1 investigations for the site. If

different conditions are encountered during excavation and construction activities, then

additional regulatory responsibilities will need to be evaluated. Among the regulations that were

reviewed for possible application were:

1) hazardous waste;

2) solid waste;

3) beneficial use;

4) voluntary action;

5) drinking and ground water;

6) surface water; and

7) air.

As part of this process, we held discussions with representatives of the Ohio EPA in order to

discuss potential problems and analytical results and to confirm our interpretations relating to

regulatory applicability. A brief discussion of each of these evaluations is found in the following

sections.

6.2 Hazardous Waste

As discussed in Section 4.2, materials at a site can be considered to be a hazardous waste

based on their presence on a list prepared by USEPA or based on specific characteristics of the

waste. If the fill materials were determined to be hazardous waste, the materials would require

special handling and disposal at a hazardous waste disposal site. If hazardous wastes were

determined to be present, excavation may have been determined to be cumbersome and cost

prohibitive. Therefore, it was necessary to quickly determine if the materials were classified as

hazardous waste and the soil would need to be managed as a waste.

109

Although it was determined that the fill material was not “listed” hazardous waste, it was

necessary to collect samples of the fill materials to determine if they were considered hazardous

waste based on the characteristic of toxicity. Tests to measure toxicity were performed using the

toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP). Materials may be classified as hazardous

waste due to their leaching potential of metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and/or semi-

volatile organic compounds (SVOCs). A sufficient number of samples (17 for metals, 10 for

VOCs, and 16 for SVOCs) from a full range of depth of the fill were collected and analyzed.

When the analytical results were received, the results were compared to Table 1 of OAC

3745-51-24. No concentrations of metals, VOCs or SVOCs were determined to have toxicity

characteristics that would cause the fill materials to be classified as hazardous waste.

Discussions with individuals at the Ohio EPA were held to confirm that the number of samples

were sufficient to make the determination. Therefore, the fill materials were determined not to

be classified as hazardous waste and subject to the hazardous waste rules.

6.3 Solid Waste

It was necessary to determine if the fill materials were considered solid waste because, if

they were, the site would be subject to OAC 3745-27-13, also known as “Rule 13”. According

to Ohio EPA (2005b), “Rule 13 establishes the procedure for obtaining authorization from the

director to fill, grade, excavate, build, drill or mine on land where a hazardous waste or solid

waste facility was operated”. The practical ramifications would be that authorization would

need to be obtained prior to any of these activities and that materials handled outside the area of

fill would need to be managed as a solid waste in accordance with solid waste laws.

Based on the review of multiple sources of historic information (including ownership of

the site by Alten Foundry owner George Alten for many years) as well as confirmation of the

presence of primarily foundry sand with inclusions of slag, glass, brick, sandstone, limestone and

shale fragments, wood, ceramic pieces, and gravel, the fill materials were determined to be

primarily foundry sand. These materials were used to fill in the old Hocking River Channel that

was relocated to the west of the site, just before the turn of the 20th

century as well as to raise the

elevation of the majority of the property above the current 100-year floodplain. It was postulated

that the pieces of brick, glass and natural stone were most likely from the demolition of onsite or

other buildings and were ancillary to the filling of the site with up to 18.5 feet of foundry sand.

In order to determine if foundry sand was considered a solid waste, the definition of solid

waste was reviewed. According to OAC 3745-27-01(S)(23), "Solid waste" means such

unwanted residual solid or semisolid material, including but not limited to garbage, scrap tires,

combustible and noncombustible material, street dirt and debris, as results from industrial,

commercial, agricultural, and community operations, excluding earth or material from

construction, mining, or demolition operations, or other waste materials of the type that

normally would be included in demolition debris, nontoxic fly ash and bottom ash, including at

least ash that results from combustion of coal, biomass fuels, and ash that results from the

combustion of coal in combination with scrap tires where scrap tires comprise not more than

fifty per cent of heat input in any month, spent nontoxic foundry sand, and slag and other

substances that are not harmful or inimical to public health, and includes but is not limited to

110

garbage, scrap tires, combustible and noncombustible material, street dirt, and debris. Solid

waste does not include any material that is an infectious waste or a hazardous waste.” (emphasis

added).

Although the regulatory definition of solid waste specifically excludes “spent nontoxic

foundry sand”, according to conversations with Ohio EPA personnel, the rules do not contain a

definition for nontoxic versus toxic. As will be discussed further in the section on Beneficial

Use, a guidance document once had a working definition, but the document was revoked in legal

proceedings and can no longer be “formally” referenced. According to some Ohio EPA

personnel, the decision on whether or not a permit under Rule 13 is needed is made on a district

by district basis (and, anecdotally, the interpretation varies by district). Conversations with

Central District Office personnel in the Division of Materials and Waste Management (the

district in which the site is located) confirmed that, based on the analytical results of the soils and

water and the characteristics of the fill, the site would not be subject to Rule 13. Therefore, the

fill materials were not directly considered to be included in the definition of solid waste.

Although spent nontoxic foundry sand is not included in the strict definition of solid

waste, the concentrations of metals and SVOCs in the fill are elevated. The Ohio EPA Fact

Sheet, Frequently Asked Questions About the Management of Soils (Ohio EPA, 1998) was

prepared because Ohio EPA received many questions about soil management. Ohio EPA (1998)

cautions that “If the movement of soil results in water pollution (e.g. silting up a stream) or air

pollution (dust), then there may be an obligation to comply with Ohio EPA regulations intended

to minimize such impacts.” The document further clarifies “If the soil is contaminated, there is

an increased potential of adverse impact to human health or the environment. If the soil is

contaminated and is located or relocated near surface waters (streams, lakes, wetlands), near an

aquifer, or near a drinking water supply well, then the likelihood of there being an obligation to

comply with Ohio EPA regulations is also increased”.

The interpretation that the foundry sand onsite is an exempt waste is made based on the

results of the subsurface investigation to date. However, if industrial solid waste, residual solid

waste, or municipal waste is found to have been disposed with the foundry sand during

construction/excavation activities, the fill may be re-classified as solid waste and subject to Rule

13. Therefore, a qualified environmental professional should be present onsite during excavation

activities to confirm that the fill is not considered a solid waste and subject to additional

regulation.

Although technically the fill can be taken to another site without environmental handling

and disposal restrictions, based on the analytical results, it is highly recommended that the fill

onsite be managed within the footprint of the current fill area (the whole site) or disposed offsite

at a landfill as solid waste. This would minimize any future liabilities associated with the

removal of the fill materials from the site, if it cannot be incorporated into the design and grading

plan onsite.

111

6.4 Beneficial Use

In 1988, Ohio EPA published a document relating to the beneficial use of nontoxic

bottom ash, fly ash and spent foundry sand and other exempt wastes. This document was

subsequently revised in 1994 (Ohio EPA, 1994) and “was developed to facilitate the beneficial

use of nontoxic bottom ash, fly ash and spent foundry sand and other exempt wastes, and to

assure that such uses do not cause water pollution”. Among other things, this document

established “nontoxic criteria” for the use of these exempt wastes, specified allowed uses based

on preferred beneficial uses and concentrations of certain metals, and required approval for

alternate beneficial uses not listed in the document. The document allowed use of foundry sand

without prior notification as long as the leachate thresholds of 30 times the drinking water

standards were met (based on TCLP results).

Based on the existence of this document since 1988, we could find no evidence to support

the allegation in the BBC&M report reviewed by Beling Consultants (1994) that “the

Environmental Protection Agency prefers to classify foundry sand as a hazardous material”.

Similarly, the reliance by Shremshock (2007) on this information was subsequently unfounded.

According to Koncelik (2012), “The policy was revoked after legal challenge was raised

to EPA’s authority to regulate through policy”. Since the revocation in 2003, “Some industry

representatives take the position that the industrial materials are unregulated because Ohio EPA

has not established rules. Ohio EPA takes the legal position that this material is regulated as a

waste under R.C. 6111. Ohio EPA asserts that companies need authorizations from the Division

of Surface Water in order to be deemed protective of water resources” (Koncelik, 2012).

In 2006, Ohio EPA proposed efforts to develop beneficial use rules to fill the regulatory

vacuum created by the revocation of the Beneficial Use guidance document. However, the

process was controversial and no regulations were adopted. In June 2012, Ohio EPA again

issued a public notice for involvement in the development of beneficial use of industrial

byproducts (including foundry sand). Conversations with individuals at Ohio EPA indicated

that, as of this time, no progress has been made on adopting rules relating to the beneficial use of

foundry sand. Therefore, there are currently no beneficial use requirements that apply to the site.

6.5 Voluntary Action

The Ohio Voluntary Action Program was created in 1994 under Ohio Revised Code

(ORC) 3746. OAC 3745-300 became effective in 1996 and have been subsequently revised.

The Voluntary Action Program (VAP) allows a volunteer to clean up hazardous substances and

petroleum on a property and to receive a release of liability for clean-up from both the Ohio EPA

and the USEPA if certain criteria are followed. The VAP is a voluntary program that relies upon

private parties to investigate and clean up a property without traditional regulatory entanglement.

The clean-up must be performed under the direction of a Certified VAP Professional using a

Certified VAP Laboratory and specific standards.

112

Because foundry sand is not a regulated substance, in conversations with representatives

from Ohio EPA, it was discussed that perhaps resources and/or technical assistance could be

used from the VAP program, but that the VAP program might not be the preferred option for the

County at this point. It should be noted, however, that the generic standards developed for VAP

sites have been used to gage the magnitude of concentrations of constituents and to assist in the

determination of the need for a site-specific risk assessment for complete pathways at the site. It

is not uncommon for other EPA regulatory programs to either reference or use VAP standards as

part of assessment or clean-up activities, even though the site is not entered into the VAP

program.

6.6 Drinking and Ground Water

The primary function of the Division of Drinking and Ground Water is to enforce the

regulations that govern public water supplies (typically relating to operation of public water

systems, testing and reporting of water quality, and source water protection). The Division of

Drinking and Ground Water also functions as a “consultant” to other divisions within the agency

to advise on issues relating to groundwater quality (e.g. landfills, industrial contamination, VAP,

etc.). According to representatives of Ohio EPA, the Central District Office of the Division of

Drinking and Ground Water prefers to answer questions only relating to sites for which a request

for review has been initiated by another Division within the Ohio EPA. The Central District

Office, Division of Drinking and Ground Water respectfully declined to even listen to any facts

relating to the site, or to discuss the site at all.

Based on our investigation, the Division of Drinking and Ground Water has no specific

regulations that apply to the site. That said, the proximity of the Miller Park Wellfield to the site

(the nearest municipal well is 60 feet from the site) does require professional judgment when

evaluating potential site activities in the fill materials adjacent to the wellfield.

As indicated by the initial historical site evaluation, the Miller Park Water Treatment

Plant has been located just north of the site since at least April 1884. The foundry sand on the

site was deposited sometime after 1921 and was probably being filled in 1938 as evidenced by

the historical aerial photograph. Therefore, at least a portion of the fill materials have probably

been on the site for over 75 years. Fill was also deposited in the southwest portion of the Miller

Park Wellfield as evidenced by the historical trees and the present-day guardrail, although the

character of the fill is not known to us. The materials encountered immediately below the fill in

our investigation consisted of organic silts, clayey silts and sand. The shallow deposits indicate

that a continuous “protective layer” is not present in all places immediately underlying the fill.

An evaluation of the deeper geologic deposits at the site was not undertaken as part of this

evaluation. Although an in-depth evaluation of the flow paths to the wellfield as well as

evaluation of subsurface conditions affecting fate and transport of potential contaminants is

beyond the scope of this investigation, we are not aware of reported impacts to any of the

municipal wells that are attributed to the presence of the fill materials on the current site.

Due to the proximity of the wellfield, coupled with the soil analytical results obtained

from this investigation, it is strongly recommended that in order to continue to protect the

wellfield that the methods of constructing building subsurface foundations during site

113

redevelopment minimize the direct transport of fill materials downward into underlying natural

materials. When constructing deeper foundations, it is recommended that the fill materials be

“cased off” prior to deeper subsurface penetration. Alternately, if appropriate, shallow

foundations completed within the fill materials (wherein the underlying materials are not

penetrated) would be an acceptable option. We recognize that there may also be other methods

of foundation construction that would achieve the stated objective of minimizing any downward

transport of the fill materials into the underlying in-situ materials.

6.7 Surface Water

As discussed in the beneficial use section, according to Koncelik (2012), “Ohio EPA has

taken the position that [foundry sand] is regulated as a waste under R.C. 6111”. According to

conversations with representatives of Ohio EPA, the presence of the foundry sand will need to be

addressed as part of the general stormwater permit for construction activities. If the stormwater

from the site that has contacted the fill is routed to a combined sewer, then no permit is needed.

If, however, the stormwater that has come into contact with the fill will discharge to the

river (either directly or through transport via a storm sewer), then the Central District Office,

Division of Surface Water will need to review both the proposed stormwater plan as well as the

analytical results from the subsurface investigation of the fill materials as part of the permit

process. The Ohio EPA representative indicated that, based on analytical results and the

proposed stormwater plan, worst case scenario, the stormwater from the site might need to be

contained and appropriately disposed. Best case scenario, no additional permit conditions would

be required. However, without formally reviewing the analytical results in context with the plan,

no further guidance could be obtained from the Agency.

6.8 Air

According to Ohio EPA (1998) “If the movement of soil results in…air pollution (dust),

then there may be an obligation to comply with Ohio EPA regulations intended to minimize such

impacts”. Conversations with representatives of Ohio EPA confirmed that no air permit is

needed for construction activities at the site. However, construction activities will need to

employ measures to minimize dust emission.

Based on the soil concentrations of mercury in the fill materials (and, secondarily, semi-

volatile compounds), a conservative interpretation of risk is that there may be an unacceptable

indoor air risk to inmates and workers once the building is complete. Further discussion of the

potential for risk via indoor air is found in Section 5.9. This conservative interpretation is based

on extrapolation of soil concentrations as opposed to measurements of soil gas (which are more

accurate and recommended to be collected if soil concentrations indicate a potential problem). If

no soil gas concentrations are measured, then a protective mechanism to interrupt the indoor air

pathway must be employed. Similarly, if soil gas concentrations are measured and still found to

present a risk, the indoor air pathway must be interrupted. If, however, soil gas concentrations

are determined to present no risk, then no further actions relating to indoor air are needed.

114

Potential options, if needed, for interrupting the soil to indoor air pathway include the

installation of a barrier between the fill and the building slab. Although designs vary, typically a

barrier will be installed with either a passive or active venting system consisting of one or more

venting pipes to convey air away from the building. In this situation, if a venting system is

necessary and chosen, the venting system will require an air permit from Ohio EPA (or the local

air authority to whom Ohio EPA has delegated responsibility).

Based on the concentration of lead in the fill materials, it may be necessary to address

potential human health impacts from lead during construction. Further discussion of lead and

health risks in outside air is found in Section 5.10. According to 29CFR 1926.62, an initial air

monitoring program to determine whether lead concentrations exceed the OSHA lead action

level of 30 µg/m3 for onsite workers during construction is required. If the action level is not

exceeded, no further air exposure monitoring is needed. If the action level is exceeded,

administrative and/or engineering controls must be implemented to minimize worker exposure to

lead. A medical surveillance program must also be implemented to assure that worker’s lead

blood concentrations do not exceed 50 ug/dl.

115

SECTION 7

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

7.1 Conclusions

The primary purpose of this investigation was to conduct an initial subsurface

environmental sampling and analysis program to develop information about the chemical

characteristics of the existing undocumented fill materials underlying the proposed footprint of

the new Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility at the West Wheeling Street location.

Specifically, the objective was to environmentally characterize these materials so as to exercise

due care with respect to excavation or other disturbance of the fill materials during construction

activities. The following conclusions summarize the salient points that impact recommendations

for activities related to the onsite fill materials.

1) Evaluation of available historical records and property ownership show that George

Alten (also owner of Alten’s Foundry formerly located on the east side of Memorial

Drive until closure in 1983) purchased the majority of the site property in 1921 and

likely used foundry sand from his business to raise the majority of the site above the

current 100-year floodplain.

2) Prior to purchase of another small portion of the site by George Alten in 1935, the site

was also historically used as a slaughterhouse and meat packing facility by the

Thimmes Brothers and Lancaster Packing Company. Although many of these types

of operations also performed tanning of hides, there is no indication that such

activities were part of these businesses.

3) The proposed footprint of the Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility is partially

located over the former channel of the Hocking River (which was channelized and

relocated to its present location just prior to the turn of the 20th

century).

4) The investigation confirmed that between 8 to 11 feet of fill (consisting primarily of

foundry sand with varying quantities of glass, brick, ceramic, slag, wire, and

fragments of sandstone, limestone and shale) are present under the proposed building

footprint. Previous subsurface borings have indicated that the fill overlies the entire

site in depths ranging from 5 to 18.5 feet.

5) The investigation confirmed that portions of the fill materials are partially saturated at

the base of the fill in some locations (between 9 and 10 feet below grade), particularly

in the vicinity of the former Hocking River Channel. Previous subsurface

investigations have also indicated saturation at similar depths.

116

6) Analytical results performed using the Toxicity Characterization Leaching Procedure

(TCLP) for metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and semi-volatile organic

compounds (SVOCs) show that the fill materials are not classified as hazardous

waste.

7) Measurable concentrations of VOCs, gasoline range organics (GRO) and diesel range

organics (DRO) in soils are either not present or below appropriate action levels.

8) Three complete potential human exposure pathways exist at the site, including dermal

exposure for construction/excavation workers, outdoor air (inhalation) for

construction workers, and indoor air (inhalation) for residents and workers at the

proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public Safety Facility.

9) With regard to construction/excavation workers, the potential for an increased health

risk exists when onsite more than 90 days (dermal exposure) or 200 days (inhalation

exposure). However, the potential for increased health risk can be reduced by using

administrative controls such as limiting time on site and job rotation, and/or reducing

direct contact with the soil (gloves and long sleeves).

10) Based on the concentrations of chemicals of concern (COCs) in the soil,

construction/excavation workers onsite for greater than 90 days are expected to have

an increased dermal risk due to arsenic. For construction/excavation workers, this

risk can be managed by requiring workers (as part of a health and safety plan) to wear

gloves and long sleeves. Workers should also be reminded that showering after work

will further reduce their exposure.

11) Based on the concentrations of COCs in the soil, construction/excavation workers are

expected to have an increased inhalation risk due to mercury if they are onsite

fulltime more than 200 days. This risk can be managed (as part of a health and safety

plan) by limiting either the number of hours and/or the number of days of exposure

for the worker.

12) Based on presence of lead in the soil, OSHA requires that initial onsite air monitoring

be performed to confirm that lead concentrations in the air are less than 30 µg/m3. If

this level is not exceeded, no further air exposure monitoring is needed. If this level

is exceeded, OSHA requires that administrative and/or engineering controls must be

implemented to minimize worker exposure to lead. Also, if this level is exceeded, a

medical surveillance program must also be implemented to assure that worker’s lead

blood concentrations do not exceed 50 ug/dl.

13) With regard to residents (assuming a one-year exposure, 24 hours per day) and

workers (assuming a 25-year exposure, 8 hours per day) in the proposed new

building, preliminary calculations using soil concentrations indicate that further

analysis (currently underway) of the vapor intrusion pathway is needed to confirm or

deny if a potential for exposure will exist.

117

14) Based on preliminary evaluation of concentrations of mercury and naphthalene in the

soil, measurements of concentrations of these chemicals of concern in soil gas have

been initiated to determine if vapor intrusion into the new building will pose an

increased health risk for workers and residents. If soil gas measurements show no

increased exposure, then no measures are needed to protect the residents and workers.

If soil gas measurements indicate an increased exposure, then measures to interrupt

the pathway must be employed (e.g. installation of a physical barrier below the slab

with passive or active air removal).

15) The City of Lancaster Miller Park Wellfield (located immediately north of the site)

has been pumping water continuously from this location for at least 130 years. The

closest municipal well is approximately 60 feet north of the site property boundary.

The City has two monitoring wells (one deep and one shallow) on the southern

portion of this site.

16) The site is located within the designated one-year time of travel zone for the Miller

Park Wellfield wellhead protection plan that was modeled using parameters for an

unconfined aquifer (no layer protecting the wellfield from surface sources of

contamination). No mention of either the fill activities at the southwestern corner of

the wellfield (on the City property) or on the proposed Fairfield County Jail/Public

Safety Facility site property as a potential source of contamination are included

among the 310 potential sources of contamination within the 5-year time of travel for

the wellfield.

17) Due to the proximity of the wellfield to the site, coupled with the analytical results of

metals and SVOCs in soils obtained during this investigation, care should be taken to

avoid carrying fill materials downward into the underlying in situ aquifer materials.

18) Concentrations of dissolved metals and VOCs measured in groundwater within the

fill do not exceed primary drinking water standards, except for one detection of

arsenic in one of the two temporary monitoring wells. Consumer Confidence Reports

for 2009 through 2013 for the City of Lancaster Miller Park Wellfield do not indicate

any exceedances of the primary drinking water standard for arsenic in this wellfield.

19) Site investigations indicate that the fill materials are primarily foundry sand that has

not been co-disposed with industrial solid waste, residual solid waste, or municipal

solid waste. Spent non-toxic foundry sand is exempt from the definition of solid

waste. Therefore, no permit under OAC 3745-27-13 (Rule 13) is needed to excavate

the onsite fill materials.

20) Although foundry sand was once regulated by Ohio EPA under a beneficial use

policy, that policy was rescinded in 2003. Subsequent (and current) efforts to adopt

rules relating to the beneficial use of foundry sand have not resulted in adoption of

rules. Therefore, this site is not subject to beneficial use policy or rules.

118

21) Ohio EPA has taken the position that foundry sand is regulated as a waste under R.C.

6111. Therefore, if the stormwater from the site is not disposed in a combined sewer,

stormwater that has come in contact with the fill materials will need to be managed as

part of the construction general stormwater permit process. Specific permit

determinations will be made by Ohio EPA on a site- and chemical-specific basis as

part of the stormwater permit process.

22) No air permit is needed from Ohio EPA for onsite construction activities. However,

if either a passive or active air removal system is installed below the slab of the new

facility, an air permit for the venting system will be needed.

7.2 Recommendations

1) Due to the concentrations of constituents in the fill and the proximity of the Miller Park

Wellfield, the direct transport of fill materials downward into underlying natural

materials should be minimized. If foundation depths exceed the depth of the fill, it is

recommended that the fill materials be “cased off” prior to deeper subsurface penetration.

2) A qualified environmental professional should be present onsite during excavation

activities to confirm that the fill does not contain industrial waste, residual waste, or

municipal waste that may make the fill subject to additional regulation.

3) In order to minimize future liabilities, onsite soils should be managed within the footprint

of the current filled area (the whole site). If soils must be disposed offsite, the soils

should be disposed at a solid waste landfill.

4) Because Ohio EPA has taken the position that spent nontoxic foundry sand is regulated as

a waste under R.C. 6111, it is recommended that unless all stormwater from the site will

enter a combined sewer, the general stormwater permit for construction activities address

the management of stormwater that has come into contact with the fill materials.

5) Due to the calculation of an increased risk for workers due to dermal exposure to arsenic

and inhalation exposure to mercury, bid specifications should require contractors to

develop a health and safety plan that addresses mitigation of the risks where workers are

anticipated to be onsite for more than 90 days. (According to the risk assessment,

acceptable mitigation of dermal exposure can be accomplished by wearing gloves and

long sleeves and by encouraging workers to shower. Similarly, acceptable mitigation of

inhalation exposure can be accomplished by limiting the number of fulltime days on site

to less than 200.)

6) Bid specifications should require contractors to develop an OSHA compliance plan for

protection of workers from lead exposure during construction/excavation.

7) Bid specifications should require contractors to conduct an initial air monitoring program

to determine whether lead concentrations in onsite air exceed the OSHA lead action level

of 30 µg/m3 for onsite workers during construction. If the action level is not exceeded,

120

SECTION 8

REFERENCES

Beling Consultants, 1992. Phase 1 Environmental Property Assessment, Proposed County

Minimum Security Jail, 342 West Wheeling Street, Lancaster, Ohio (stamped

“preliminary”, prepared for the Fairfield County Commissioners, Lancaster, Ohio, dated

March 1992, 77 pp.

Beling Consultants, 1994. Letter to Fairfield County Board of Commissioners regarding the

subsurface boring report prepared by BBC&M for the Charley Horse and surrounding

property, dated May 19, 1994 and authored by Marvin L. VanMeter, with pages 6

through 12 of the BBC&M report attached, 10 pp.

CDC, 2013. Mercury (Elemental) – Lung damaging agent.

http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ershdb/EmergencyresponseCard_29750021.html, accessed

June 19, 2014.

Environmental Quality Management, 2004. User’s guide for evaluating subsurface vapor

intrusion into buildings. Report prepared for Industrial Economic Incorporated. EPA

contract number 68-W-02-33, work assignment 004, PN 030224.0002, 133 pp.

Geotechnical Consultants, Inc., 2011. Subsurface Exploration and Preliminary Geotechnical

Engineering Report, Proposed Fairfield County Justice Center-MSMJ Site, 342 West

Wheeling Street, Lancaster, Ohio, prepared for the Fairfield County Commissioners and

Wachtel & McAnally Architects/Planners, dated June 10, 2011, 34 pp.

Koncelik, Joe, 2012. Ohio EPA Attempts Second Effort to Develop Beneficial Use Rules, Ohio

Environmental Law Blog, posted at 1:37 on July 11, 2012,

http://www.ohioenvironmentallawblog.com/2012/07/articles/federal-and-state-

developments/ohio-epa-attempts-second-effort-to-develop-beneficial-use-rules/, accessed

June 24, 2014.

Lawhon & Associates, 1993. Environmental Assessment Report, 121 North Memorial Street,

Lancaster, Ohio 43130, prepared for Mr. John L. Shockley, The Huntington Trust

Company, N.A., 41 South High Street, 10th

Floor, Columbus, Ohio 43216, regarding the

Charley Horse property, dated February 12, 1993,

Multiple Authors, 1902. Biographical for Fairfield County, Ohio, The S. J. Clarke Publishing

Company, New York and Chicago, Biography of John H. Thimmes, pp. 214-216.

121

Ohio EPA, 1994. Beneficial Use of Nontoxic Bottom Ash, Fly Ash and Spent Foundry Sand,

and Other Exempt Waste, Policy DSW-0400-007, Ohio Division of Surface Water,

Revision 0, October 1, 1988, Revision 1, November 7, 1994, Removed, April 30, 2003,

14 pp.

Ohio EPA, 1998. Frequently Asked Questions about the Management of Soils, Fact Sheet

Number 0610, Division of Solid & Infectious Waste Management, dated February 1998,

2 pp.

Ohio EPA, 2005a. Petroleum Contaminated Sites Guidance Document for Emergency Response

Actions, Ohio EPA Division of Emergency and Remedial Response, Emergency

Response and Special Investigations Section, DERR-00-ER-013, dated March 2005, 34

pp.

Ohio EPA, 2005b. Implementation of “Rule 13” [OAC 3745-27-13], Guidance Document

#0631, Division of Solid and Infectious Waste management, dated May 12, 2005, 5 pp.

Ohio EPA, 2010a. Assessing compounds without formal toxicity values available for use in

human health risk assessment. Division of Environmental Response and Revitalization,

Technical Decision Compendium, 4 pp.

Ohio EPA, 2010b. Sample collection and evaluation of vapor intrusion to indoor air for remedial

response and voluntary action programs, guidance document. Division of Environmental

Response and Revitalization, 114 pp.

Ohio EPA, 2012. Technical Guidance Manual for Ground Water Investigations, Chapter 10,

Ground Water Sampling, Revision 2, Division of Drinking and Ground Waters, 50 West

Town Street, Suite 700, Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049, dated May 2012, 73 pp.

Porter, 2014a. Title Reports 4 and 6 relating to Parcel Nos. 0536801700 (4.8 acres and Lot 9W

M. A. Daugherty’s Addition) and 0536001700 (0.107 acres), prepared for Jeffrey D.

Porter, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney of Fairfield County, Ohio, 239 W. Main Street,

Suite 101, Lancaster, Ohio and attachments, 10 pp.

Porter, 2014b. Title Report 5 relating to Parcel No. 0536001800, prepared for Jeffrey D. Porter,

Assistant Prosecuting Attorney of Fairfield County, Ohio, 239 W. Main Street, Suite 101,

Lancaster, Ohio and attachments, 13 pp.

Scott, 1877. A Complete History of Fairfield County, Ohio, 1795 – 1876, Siebert & Lilley,

Printers and Binders, Columbus, Ohio, 338 pp.

Shremschock Architects, Inc., 2007. Site Analysis and Selection for the Fairfield County Public

Safety Facility, prepared for the Fairfield County Commissioners, dated September 11,

2007, 45 pp.

122

Solar Testing Laboratories, Inc., 1999. Geotechnical Investigation for 342 West Wheeling

Street, 4.01 Acre Site, Proposed Juvenile Detention Center, Lancaster, Ohio, prepared for

the Fairfield County Board of Commissioners, c/o Fairfield County Sanitary Engineer,

dated February 19, 1999, 59 pp.

URS Consultants, 1993a. Wellhead Protection Plan, City of Lancaster, Ohio, Miller Park

Wellfield, dated August 23, 1993, 47 pp.

URS Consultants, 1993b. Preliminary Potential Contaminant Source Inventory, City of

Lancaster, Miller Park Wellfield (including Appendix D), dated August 23, 1993, 117 pp.

URS Greiner, Monitoring Well Program: First Year of Quarterly Analytical Results for the City

of Lancaster, Miller Park Wellfield, Wellhead Protection Program, dated December 5,

1996, 10 pp.

USEPA, 1993. Provisional guidance for quantitative risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons. Office of Research and Development, EPA/600/R-93/089, 28 pp.

USEPA, 1999. Reference concentration for chronic inhalation – cadmium and cadmium

compounds, external review draft. 13 pp.

USEPA, 2003a. Human health toxicity values in Superfund risk assessments. Memorandum

from Michael B. Cook, Director, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology

Innovation. OSWER directive 9285.7-53, 4 pp.

USEPA, 2003b. Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an

approach to assessing risks associated with adult exposures to lead in soil. Technical

Review Workgroup for Lead, EPA-540-R-03-001, 62 pp.

USEPA, 2004. Risk assessment guidance for Superfund Volume I: Human Health Evaluation

Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for dermal risk assessment). Office of

Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, EPA/540/R/99/005, 156 pp.

USEPA, 2009a. Risk assessment guidance for Superfund Volume I: Human Health Evaluation

Manual (Part F, Supplemental Guidance for inhalation risk assessment). Office of

Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, EPA/540/R/070/002, 68 pp.

USEPA, 2009b. Transmittal of Update of Adult Lead Methodology’s default baseline blood lead

concentration and geometric standard deviation parameters. Memorandum from James

E. Woolford, Directorm Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation,

OSWER 9200.2-82, 15 pp.

USEPA, 2012. Toxicological review of benzo[a]pyrene (CASRN 50-32-8) in support of

summary information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). National Center

for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development. EPA/635/R-

10/006C, 179 pp.

123

USEPA, 2014. Human health and lead, addressing lead at Superfund sites.

http://aaa.epa.gov/superfund/lead/health.htm, accessed June 24, 2014.

USEPA Mid-Atlantic Risk Assessment, 2014. Regional screening table.

http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/human/rb-concentration_table/, accessed June 23,

2014.

Appendix A

Photographs of project field activities

Figure A-1. Marked boring location and CME 75 drilling rig ready to start drilling with 55

gallon drum to contain drill cuttings and buckets of wash and rinse water to clean split spoon

samplers.

Figure A-2. Collection of split spoon sample for 0 to 2 feet with automatic hammer. Note pilot

bit inside 4 ¼-inch hollow stem augers ready to drill after collection of sample.

Figure A-3. Soil containerized in drum labeled with date and source of drilling cuttings.

Figure A-4. Drums on palates ready to be moved to the Fairfield County Maintenance Building

for temporary storage pending analytical results.

Figure A-5. Cleaning drilling equipment with high pressure cleaner.

Figure A-6. Drum with drilling equipment wash water labeled and ready to close.

Figure A7. Screening of a sample in a split spoon sampler upon opening of the split spoon.

Figure A-8. Logging samples.

Figure A-9. Collecting samples for VOCs with a Terra Core Sampler.

Figure A-10. Placing the Terra Core sample in laboratory jar for analysis.

Figure A-11. Samples being collected and placed in laboratory jar for analysis.

Figure A-12. Abandoning boring where no water was encountered by pumping bentonite slurry

into borehole.

Figure A-13. Bentonite slurry in abandoned borehole.

Figure A-14. Abandoned borehole topped off with Quickrete.

Figure A-15. Installation of 2-inch PVC temporary monitoring well inside 4 ¼-inch hollow stem

augers.

Figure A-16. Locking cap of temporary monitoring well BW-4.

Figure A-17. Flush mount completion of temporary monitoring well BW-1.

Figure A-18. Measuring the water level in temporary monitoring well BW-4 with an electric

water level tape.

Figure A-19. Polyethylene bailer with purged water (notice black color) in bucket.

Figure A-20. Containerized and labeled wash water form drilling activities and purge water

from sampling the two temporary groundwater monitoring wells.

Figure A-21. Collecting filtered water sample for metals from temporary monitoring well BW-1.

Figure A-22. Removing casing from temporary monitoring well BW-4.

Figure A-23. Void where casing has been removed form temporary monitoring well BW-1.

Figure A-24. Temporary monitoring well BW-4 filled with Portland cement.

Figure A-25. Location of abandoned temporary monitoring well BW-1 after it was topped off

with Quickrete.

Appendix B

Boring logs

Appendix C

Monitoring well completion diagrams and

driller logs filed with the Ohio Department

of Natural Resources (ODNR)

Appendix D

Water well sealing reports filed with ODNR

Appendix E

Soil analytical results for borings BW-1, BW-2,

BW-3 and BW-4

ANALYTICAL REPORTTestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.TestAmerica Canton4101 Shuffel Street NWNorth Canton, OH 44720Tel: (330)497-9396

TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio

For:Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.98 County Line Road WestSuite CWesterville, Ohio 43082

Attn: Ms. Linda Aller

Authorized for release by:4/4/2014 5:28:18 PM

Mark Loeb, Project Manager II(330)[email protected]

This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature isintended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.

Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

https://secure.testamericainc.com/TotalAccess/login.aspx

http://www.testamericainc.com/AskTheExpert/Expert_index.htm

http://www.testamericainc.com

mailto:[email protected]

Table of Contents

Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio

TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1

Page 2 of 93TestAmerica Canton

4/4/2014

Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Definitions/Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

Detection Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

Surrogate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

QC Association Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77

Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83

Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89

Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Definitions/GlossaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.

Project/Site: Lancaster Ohio

Qualifiers

GC/MS VOA

Qualifier Description

U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.

Qualifier

J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.

* ISTD response or retention time outside acceptable limits

B Compound was found in the blank and sample.

* LCS or LCSD exceeds the control limits

GC/MS Semi VOA



Qualifier



X Surrogate is outside control limits

GC VOA



Qualifier

GC Semi VOA



Qualifier

Metals



Qualifier



Glossary

These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.

¤ Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis

Abbreviation

%R Percent Recovery

CNF Contains no Free Liquid

DER Duplicate error ratio (normalized absolute difference)

Dil Fac Dilution Factor

DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample

DLC Decision level concentration

MDA Minimum detectable activity

EDL Estimated Detection Limit

MDC Minimum detectable concentration

MDL Method Detection Limit

ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)

NC Not Calculated

ND Not detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)

PQL Practical Quantitation Limit

QC Quality Control

RER Relative error ratio

RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)

RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points

TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)

TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)

TestAmerica Canton

Page 3 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Case NarrativeClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1


Job ID: 240-35317-1

Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton

Narrative

CASE NARRATIVE

Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.

Project: Lancaster Ohio

Report Number: 240-35317-1

With the exceptions noted as flags or footnotes, standard analytical protocols were followed in the analysis of the samples and no

problems were encountered or anomalies observed. In addition all laboratory quality control samples were within established control

limits, with any exceptions noted below. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of

the method. In some cases, due to interference or analytes present at high concentrations, samples were diluted. For diluted samples,

the reporting limits are adjusted relative to the dilution required.

TestAmerica Canton attests to the validity of the laboratory data generated by TestAmerica facilities reported herein. All analyses

performed by TestAmerica facilities were done using established laboratory SOPs that incorporate QA/QC procedures described in the

application methods. TestAmerica’s operations groups have reviewed the data for compliance with the laboratory QA/QC plan, and data

have been found to be compliant with laboratory protocols unless otherwise noted below.

The test results in this report meet all NELAP requirements for parameters for which accreditation is required or available. Any exceptions

to NELAP requirements are noted in this report. Pursuant to NELAP, this report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written

approval of the laboratory.

Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.

All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the

individual sections below.

All solid sample results are reported on an "as received" basis unless otherwise indicated by the presence of a % solids value in the

method header.

This laboratory report is confidential and is intended for the sole use of TestAmerica and its client.

RECEIPT

The samples were received on 3/21/2014 9:45 AM; the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice.

The temperature of the cooler at receipt was 4.8º C.

TCLP VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)

Samples BW1 6-8 (240-35317-2), BW2 6-8 (240-35317-8), BW3 6-7.5 (240-35317-13) and BW4 0.5-2 (240-35317-14) were analyzed for

TCLP volatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/8260B. The samples were leached on

03/30/2014 and analyzed on 03/31/2014.

No difficulties were encountered during the VOCs analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)

Samples BW1 4-6 (240-35317-1), BW2 2-4 (240-35317-6), BW3 2-4 (240-35317-11) and BW4-2-4 (240-35317-15) were analyzed for

volatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8260B. The samples were prepared on 03/21/2014 and

analyzed on 03/26/2014 and 03/27/2014.

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene was detected in method blank MB 240-124052/6 at a level that was above the method detection limit but below the

reporting limit. The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above the

TestAmerica CantonPage 4 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Job ID: 240-35317-1 (Continued)

Laboratory: TestAmerica Canton (Continued)

MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.

Tetrachloroethene and trans-1,2-Dichloroethene failed the recovery criteria high for LCS 240-124125/8. These analytes were biased high

in the LCS and were not detected in the associated samples; therefore, the data have been reported.

Internal standard (ISTD) response for the following sample(s) was outside control limits: BW4-2-4 (240-35317-15). The sample(s) was

re-extracted and/or re-analyzed with concurring results, and the original set of data has been reported.

Insufficient sample volume was available to perform a matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate/sample duplicate (MS/MSD/DUP) associated

with batch 124125.

No other difficulties were encountered during the VOCs analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.

TCLP SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)

Samples BW1 6-10 (240-35317-3), BW2 1-2 (240-35317-5), BW2 4-8 (240-35317-7), BW3 2-6 (240-35317-12), BW4-2-6 (240-35317-16)

and BW4-6-8 (240-35317-17) were analyzed for TCLP semivolatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods

1311/8270C. The samples were leached on 03/28/2014, prepared on 03/28/2014 and 04/02/2014 and analyzed on 04/01/2014 and

04/03/2014.

Surrogates are added during the extraction process prior to dilution. When the sample is diluted, surrogate recoveries are diluted out and

no corrective action is required.

No difficulties were encountered during the SVOCs analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GCMS)

Samples BW1 4-6 (240-35317-1), BW1 10-12 (240-35317-4), BW2 2-4 (240-35317-6), BW3 1.5-2 (240-35317-10), BW3 2-4

(240-35317-11), BW4-2-4 (240-35317-15) and BW4-8-10 (240-35317-18) were analyzed for semivolatile organic compounds (GCMS) in

accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8270C. The samples were prepared on 03/25/2014 and 03/26/2014 and analyzed on 03/28/2014,

03/31/2014 and 04/01/2014.



Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was detected in method blank MB 240-123851/23-A at a level that was above the method detection limit but

below the reporting limit. The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result

above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged.

Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and Di-n-butyl phthalate were detected in method blank MB 240-124042/19-A at levels that were above the

method detection limit but below the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged. If the

associated sample reported a result above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged.

2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr), 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr), 2-Fluorophenol (Surr), Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr), Phenol-d5 (Surr) and Terphenyl-d14

(Surr) failed the surrogate recovery criteria low for BW1 10-12 (240-35317-4).

Samples BW1 4-6 (240-35317-1)[4X], BW1 10-12 (240-35317-4)[400X], BW2 2-4 (240-35317-6)[2.5X], BW4-2-4 (240-35317-15)[2.5X] and

BW4-8-10 (240-35317-18)[5X] required dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted accordingly.

The following sample was diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: BW1 4-6 (240-35317-1). Elevated reporting limits (RLs) are

provided.

No other difficulties were encountered during the SVOCs analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.

GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS

Sample BW2 8-9 (240-35317-9) was analyzed for gasoline range organics in accordance with SW846 Method 8015C. The samples were

prepared and analyzed on 03/25/2014.


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





No difficulties were encountered during the GrOain size analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.

DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS (DRO)

Sample BW2 8-9 (240-35317-9) was analyzed for diesel range organics (DRO) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8015C - DRO.

The samples were prepared on 03/25/2014 and analyzed on 03/31/2014.

No difficulties were encountered during the DRO analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.

TCLP METALS (ICP)


and BW4-6-8 (240-35317-17) were analyzed for TCLP metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/6010B. The samples

were leached on 03/28/2014, prepared on 03/28/2014 and analyzed on 03/31/2014.

Barium was detected in method blanks LB 240-124371/1-C and MB 240-124402/2-A at levels that were above the method detection limit

but below the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged. If the associated sample reported a

result above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.

No other difficulties were encountered during the metals analysis. All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.

TOTAL METALS (ICP)


(240-35317-11), BW4-2-4 (240-35317-15) and BW4-8-10 (240-35317-18) were analyzed for total metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA

SW-846 Method 6010B. The samples were prepared on 03/24/2014 and 03/26/2014 and analyzed on 03/25/2014, 03/26/2014, 03/27/2014

and 03/28/2014.

Barium and Potassium were detected in method blank MB 240-124048/1-A at levels that were above the method detection limit but below

the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above

the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.

Samples BW1 4-6 (240-35317-1)[2X], BW1 10-12 (240-35317-4)[5X], BW2 2-4 (240-35317-6)[2X] and BW4-8-10 (240-35317-18)[5X]

required dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted accordingly.

The following sample(s) was diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: BW4-8-10 (240-35317-18). Elevated reporting limits (RLs)

are provided.


TCLP MERCURY


and BW4-6-8 (240-35317-17) were analyzed for TCLP mercury in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/7470A. The samples were

leached on 03/28/2014, prepared on 03/28/2014 and analyzed on 03/31/2014.

No difficulties were encountered during the mercury analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.

TOTAL MERCURY


(240-35317-11), BW4-2-4 (240-35317-15) and BW4-8-10 (240-35317-18) were analyzed for total mercury in accordance with EPA SW-846

Method 7471A. The samples were prepared on 03/24/2014 and 03/26/2014 and analyzed on 03/25/2014 and 03/27/2014.

Samples BW1 10-12 (240-35317-4)[20X], BW2 2-4 (240-35317-6)[5X] and BW4-8-10 (240-35317-18)[5X] required dilution prior to

analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted accordingly.



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





PERCENT SOLIDS

Samples BW1 4-6 (240-35317-1), BW1 10-12 (240-35317-4), BW2 2-4 (240-35317-6), BW2 8-9 (240-35317-9), BW3 1.5-2

(240-35317-10), BW3 2-4 (240-35317-11), BW4-2-4 (240-35317-15) and BW4-8-10 (240-35317-18) were analyzed for percent solids in

accordance with EPA Method 160.3 MOD. The samples were analyzed on 03/22/2014.

No difficulties were encountered during the % solids analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Method SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.


Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol

SW8468260B Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) TAL CAN

SW8468270C Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) TAL CAN

SW8468015C Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Gasoline Range Organics) TAL CAN

SW8468015C Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Diesel Range Organics) TAL CAN

SW8466010B Metals (ICP) TAL CAN

SW8467470A Mercury (CVAA) TAL CAN


EPAMoisture Percent Moisture TAL CAN

Protocol References:

EPA = US Environmental Protection Agency

SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.

Laboratory References:

TAL CAN = TestAmerica Canton, 4101 Shuffel Street NW, North Canton, OH 44720, TEL (330)497-9396

TestAmerica Canton

Page 8 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Sample SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.


Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix

240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Solid 03/20/14 08:00 03/21/14 09:45

240-35317-2 BW1 6-8 Solid 03/20/14 08:05 03/21/14 09:45

240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 Solid 03/20/14 08:05 03/21/14 09:45

240-35317-4 BW1 10-12 Solid 03/20/14 08:10 03/21/14 09:45

240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 Solid 03/20/14 09:30 03/21/14 09:45

240-35317-6 BW2 2-4 Solid 03/20/14 09:30 03/21/14 09:45

240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 Solid 03/20/14 09:35 03/21/14 09:45

240-35317-8 BW2 6-8 Solid 03/20/14 09:35 03/21/14 09:45

240-35317-9 BW2 8-9 Solid 03/20/14 09:41 03/21/14 09:45

240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2 Solid 03/20/14 10:45 03/21/14 09:45

240-35317-11 BW3 2-4 Solid 03/20/14 10:47 03/21/14 09:45

240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 Solid 03/20/14 10:52 03/21/14 09:45

240-35317-13 BW3 6-7.5 Solid 03/20/14 10:55 03/21/14 09:45

240-35317-14 BW4 0.5-2 Solid 03/20/14 13:00 03/21/14 09:45

240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Solid 03/20/14 13:05 03/21/14 09:45

240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 Solid 03/20/14 13:08 03/21/14 09:45

240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 Solid 03/20/14 03:12 03/21/14 09:45

240-35317-18 BW4-8-10 Solid 03/20/14 13:15 03/21/14 09:45

TestAmerica Canton

Page 9 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Detection SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.


Client Sample ID: BW1 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-1

☼2-Butanone (MEK)

RL

14 ug/Kg

MDL

0.98

Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type

Total/NA1J1.4 8260B

☼Acetone 14 ug/Kg4.4 Total/NA15.7 J 8260B

☼Methyl acetate 7.0 ug/Kg0.98 Total/NA11.4 J 8260B

☼2-Methylnaphthalene 33 ug/Kg2.5 Total/NA433 8270C

☼Anthracene 33 ug/Kg3.8 Total/NA427 J 8270C

☼Benzaldehyde 490 ug/Kg59 Total/NA4240 J 8270C

☼Benzo[a]anthracene 33 ug/Kg3.1 Total/NA4150 8270C

☼Benzo[a]pyrene 33 ug/Kg3.1 Total/NA4460 8270C

☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 33 ug/Kg2.9 Total/NA4410 8270C

☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 33 ug/Kg1.7 Total/NA4500 8270C

☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 33 ug/Kg3.3 Total/NA487 8270C

☼Chrysene 33 ug/Kg5.4 Total/NA4190 8270C

☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 33 ug/Kg3.2 Total/NA4330 8270C

☼Fluoranthene 33 ug/Kg2.7 Total/NA4200 8270C

☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 33 ug/Kg1.7 Total/NA4260 8270C

☼Phenanthrene 33 ug/Kg3.6 Total/NA4100 8270C

☼Pyrene 33 ug/Kg2.2 Total/NA4160 8270C

☼Aluminum 23 mg/Kg11 Total/NA17500 6010B

☼Antimony 1.2 mg/Kg0.45 Total/NA143 6010B

☼Arsenic 1.2 mg/Kg0.35 Total/NA118 6010B

☼Barium 23 mg/Kg0.14 Total/NA1450 6010B

☼Beryllium 0.58 mg/Kg0.050 Total/NA10.68 6010B

☼Cadmium 0.23 mg/Kg0.042 Total/NA11.4 6010B

☼Calcium 580 mg/Kg34 Total/NA158000 6010B

☼Chromium 0.58 mg/Kg0.23 Total/NA137 6010B

☼Cobalt 5.8 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA16.2 6010B

☼Copper 2.9 mg/Kg0.86 Total/NA162 6010B

☼Iron 12 mg/Kg5.7 Total/NA124000 6010B

☼Lead 0.70 mg/Kg0.44 Total/NA21100 6010B

☼Magnesium 580 mg/Kg7.5 Total/NA17800 6010B

☼Manganese 1.7 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA1470 6010B

☼Nickel 4.6 mg/Kg0.63 Total/NA124 6010B

☼Potassium 580 mg/Kg7.2 Total/NA1920 6010B

☼Selenium 0.58 mg/Kg0.52 Total/NA10.71 6010B

☼Silver 0.58 mg/Kg0.12 Total/NA11.0 6010B

☼Sodium 580 mg/Kg77 Total/NA1510 J 6010B

☼Vanadium 5.8 mg/Kg0.24 Total/NA120 6010B

☼Zinc 2.3 mg/Kg1.2 Total/NA1390 6010B

☼Mercury 0.13 mg/Kg0.020 Total/NA10.29 7471A


No Detections.


Arsenic

RL

0.50 mg/L

MDL

0.0032


TCLP1J0.017 6010B

Barium 10 mg/L0.00067 TCLP11.1 J B 6010B

Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.0074 J 6010B

Chromium 0.50 mg/L0.0022 TCLP10.0062 J 6010B

TestAmerica Canton

This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.

Page 10 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Client Sample ID: BW1 6-10 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-3

Lead

RL

0.50 mg/L

MDL

0.0019


TCLP10.74 6010B

Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0058 J 6010B


☼2-Methylnaphthalene

RL

7100 ug/Kg

MDL

530


Total/NA400J3700 8270C

☼Acenaphthene 7100 ug/Kg810 Total/NA40019000 8270C

☼Acenaphthylene 7100 ug/Kg370 Total/NA40075000 8270C

☼Anthracene 7100 ug/Kg830 Total/NA400170000 8270C

☼Benzo[a]anthracene 7100 ug/Kg670 Total/NA400420000 8270C

☼Benzo[a]pyrene 7100 ug/Kg680 Total/NA400370000 8270C

☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 7100 ug/Kg630 Total/NA400420000 8270C

☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 7100 ug/Kg370 Total/NA400200000 8270C

☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 7100 ug/Kg730 Total/NA400180000 8270C

☼Chrysene 7100 ug/Kg1200 Total/NA400380000 8270C

☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 7100 ug/Kg710 Total/NA40059000 8270C

☼Dibenzofuran 53000 ug/Kg710 Total/NA40027000 J 8270C

☼Fluoranthene 7100 ug/Kg590 Total/NA400980000 8270C

☼Fluorene 7100 ug/Kg570 Total/NA40067000 8270C

☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 7100 ug/Kg370 Total/NA400180000 8270C

☼Naphthalene 7100 ug/Kg880 Total/NA40013000 8270C

☼Phenanthrene 7100 ug/Kg780 Total/NA400570000 8270C

☼Pyrene 7100 ug/Kg470 Total/NA400800000 8270C





☼Beryllium 1.2 mg/Kg0.11 Total/NA10.56 J 6010B




☼Cobalt 12 mg/Kg0.40 Total/NA16.7 J 6010B


☼Iron 25 mg/Kg12 Total/NA195000 6010B


☼Magnesium 1200 mg/Kg16 Total/NA113000 6010B


☼Nickel 10 mg/Kg1.3 Total/NA134 6010B

☼Potassium 1200 mg/Kg15 Total/NA1850 J 6010B




☼Thallium 2.5 mg/Kg1.4 Total/NA11.5 J 6010B

☼Vanadium 12 mg/Kg0.52 Total/NA124 6010B

☼Zinc 25 mg/Kg12 Total/NA54500 6010B

☼Mercury 5.8 mg/Kg0.87 Total/NA2057 7471A


TestAmerica Canton


Page 11 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




Arsenic

RL

0.50 mg/L

MDL

0.0032


TCLP1J0.0098 6010B


Cadmium 0.10 mg/L0.00066 TCLP10.54 6010B


Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.030 J 6010B



☼Methylene Chloride

RL

2.9 ug/Kg

MDL

0.38


Total/NA1J0.53 8260B

☼1,1'-Biphenyl 150 ug/Kg10 Total/NA2.516 J 8270C

☼2-Methylnaphthalene 19 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA2.547 8270C

☼Acenaphthene 19 ug/Kg2.2 Total/NA2.5120 8270C

☼Acenaphthylene 19 ug/Kg1.0 Total/NA2.557 8270C

☼Anthracene 19 ug/Kg2.3 Total/NA2.5300 8270C

☼Benzaldehyde 290 ug/Kg35 Total/NA2.563 J 8270C

☼Benzo[a]anthracene 19 ug/Kg1.8 Total/NA2.51000 8270C

☼Benzo[a]pyrene 19 ug/Kg1.9 Total/NA2.51000 8270C

☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 19 ug/Kg1.7 Total/NA2.51400 8270C

☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 19 ug/Kg1.0 Total/NA2.5650 8270C

☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 19 ug/Kg2.0 Total/NA2.5490 8270C

☼Carbazole 150 ug/Kg78 Total/NA2.598 J 8270C

☼Chrysene 19 ug/Kg3.2 Total/NA2.51100 8270C

☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 19 ug/Kg1.9 Total/NA2.5180 8270C

☼Dibenzofuran 150 ug/Kg1.9 Total/NA2.571 J 8270C

☼Fluoranthene 19 ug/Kg1.6 Total/NA2.52000 8270C

☼Fluorene 19 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA2.5100 8270C

☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 19 ug/Kg1.0 Total/NA2.5530 8270C

☼Naphthalene 19 ug/Kg2.4 Total/NA2.580 8270C

☼Phenanthrene 19 ug/Kg2.1 Total/NA2.51300 8270C

☼Pyrene 19 ug/Kg1.3 Total/NA2.51800 8270C

☼Aluminum 19 mg/Kg9.3 Total/NA15700 6010B








☼Cobalt 4.8 mg/Kg0.15 Total/NA14.6 J 6010B


☼Iron 9.6 mg/Kg4.7 Total/NA145000 6010B







☼Silver 0.48 mg/Kg0.096 Total/NA10.23 J 6010B

TestAmerica Canton


Page 12 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




☼Sodium

RL

480 mg/Kg

MDL

64


Total/NA1J190 6010B





Arsenic

RL

0.50 mg/L

MDL

0.0032


TCLP1J0.0095 6010B




Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.13 J 6010B



No Detections.


☼Diesel Range Organics [C10 - C28]

RL

20 mg/Kg

MDL

11


Total/NA141 8015C

Client Sample ID: BW3 1.5-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-10

☼1,1'-Biphenyl

RL

54 ug/Kg

MDL

3.8


Total/NA1J9.3 8270C

☼2-Methylnaphthalene 7.2 ug/Kg0.54 Total/NA145 8270C

☼Acenaphthene 7.2 ug/Kg0.82 Total/NA124 8270C

☼Anthracene 7.2 ug/Kg0.84 Total/NA117 8270C

☼Benzo[a]anthracene 7.2 ug/Kg0.68 Total/NA1200 8270C

☼Benzo[a]pyrene 7.2 ug/Kg0.69 Total/NA1320 8270C

☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 7.2 ug/Kg0.64 Total/NA1580 8270C

☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 7.2 ug/Kg0.38 Total/NA1390 8270C

☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 7.2 ug/Kg0.73 Total/NA1170 8270C

☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 75 ug/Kg20 Total/NA135 J B 8270C

☼Chrysene 7.2 ug/Kg1.2 Total/NA1270 8270C

☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 7.2 ug/Kg0.71 Total/NA195 8270C

☼Dibenzofuran 54 ug/Kg0.71 Total/NA117 J 8270C

☼Fluoranthene 7.2 ug/Kg0.59 Total/NA1220 8270C

☼Fluorene 7.2 ug/Kg0.57 Total/NA16.4 J 8270C

☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 7.2 ug/Kg0.38 Total/NA1290 8270C

☼Naphthalene 7.2 ug/Kg0.88 Total/NA133 8270C

☼Phenanthrene 7.2 ug/Kg0.79 Total/NA1110 8270C

☼Pyrene 7.2 ug/Kg0.47 Total/NA1190 8270C


☼Antimony 0.90 mg/Kg0.35 Total/NA11.3 6010B

☼Arsenic 0.90 mg/Kg0.27 Total/NA17.0 6010B



TestAmerica Canton


Page 13 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Client Sample ID: BW3 1.5-2 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-10

☼Cadmium

RL

0.18 mg/Kg

MDL

0.032


Total/NA10.39 6010B










☼Potassium 450 mg/Kg5.6 Total/NA1320 J 6010B



☼Vanadium 4.5 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA18.5 6010B


☼Mercury 0.098 mg/Kg0.015 Total/NA10.044 J 7471A


☼1,1'-Biphenyl

RL

59 ug/Kg

MDL

4.1


Total/NA1J6.6 8270C



☼Acenaphthylene 7.9 ug/Kg0.41 Total/NA14.4 J 8270C











☼Fluorene 7.9 ug/Kg0.63 Total/NA16.1 J 8270C






☼Antimony 1.0 mg/Kg0.40 Total/NA10.74 J 6010B


☼Barium 20 mg/Kg0.12 Total/NA168 B 6010B








TestAmerica Canton


Page 14 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




☼Lead

RL

0.31 mg/Kg

MDL

0.19


Total/NA141 6010B




☼Potassium 510 mg/Kg6.3 Total/NA1720 B 6010B






Arsenic

RL

0.50 mg/L

MDL

0.0032


TCLP1J0.0045 6010B




Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.029 J 6010B


Client Sample ID: BW3 6-7.5 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-13

No Detections.

Client Sample ID: BW4 0.5-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-14

No Detections.

Client Sample ID: BW4-2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-15

☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

RL

3.2 ug/Kg

MDL

0.17


Total/NA1J B *0.17 8260B

☼Isopropylbenzene 3.2 ug/Kg0.10 Total/NA10.60 J 8260B

☼Toluene 3.2 ug/Kg0.17 Total/NA10.21 J 8260B

☼1,1'-Biphenyl 130 ug/Kg9.4 Total/NA2.540 J 8270C



☼Acetophenone 270 ug/Kg25 Total/NA2.528 J 8270C














TestAmerica Canton


Page 15 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Client Sample ID: BW4-2-4 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-15

☼Phenanthrene

RL

18 ug/Kg

MDL

2.0


Total/NA2.5400 8270C























Arsenic

RL

0.50 mg/L

MDL

0.0032


TCLP1J0.0065 6010B




Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.0024 J 6010B



Arsenic

RL

0.50 mg/L

MDL

0.0032


TCLP1J0.0096 6010B




Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.12 J 6010B




RL

44 ug/Kg

MDL

3.3


Total/NA5100 8270C

☼Acenaphthene 44 ug/Kg5.0 Total/NA5100 8270C

☼Acenaphthylene 44 ug/Kg2.3 Total/NA532 J 8270C

☼Anthracene 44 ug/Kg5.2 Total/NA5210 8270C

TestAmerica Canton


Page 16 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Client Sample ID: BW4-8-10 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-18

☼Benzaldehyde

RL

660 ug/Kg

MDL

80


Total/NA5J190 8270C










☼Fluorene 44 ug/Kg3.5 Total/NA556 8270C


☼Naphthalene 44 ug/Kg5.4 Total/NA5100 8270C

☼Pentachlorophenol 1000 ug/Kg60 Total/NA5300 J 8270C










☼Cobalt 6.0 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA112 6010B

☼Copper 15 mg/Kg4.4 Total/NA5360 6010B





☼Nickel 24 mg/Kg3.2 Total/NA556 6010B




☼Thallium 1.2 mg/Kg0.66 Total/NA11.6 6010B

☼Vanadium 30 mg/Kg1.3 Total/NA523 J 6010B



TestAmerica Canton


Page 17 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Client Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.


Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-1Client Sample ID: BW1 4-6Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 08:00

Percent Solids: 80.6Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45

Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.5 U 3.5 0.39 ug/Kg ☼ 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnit DResult Qualifier

3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.5 U

3.5 0.91 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 3.5 U

3.5 0.27 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane 3.5 U

3.5 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,1-Dichloroethane 3.5 U

3.5 0.36 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,1-Dichloroethene 3.5 U

3.5 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 3.5 U

7.0 0.91 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 7.0 U

3.5 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene 3.5 U


3.5 0.48 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼1,2-Dichloropropane 3.5 U



14 0.98 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 1.4 J

14 0.44 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼2-Hexanone 14 U

14 0.38 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 14 U

14 4.4 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Acetone 5.7 J

3.5 0.16 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Benzene 3.5 U

3.5 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Bromoform 3.5 U

3.5 0.38 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Bromomethane 3.5 U

3.5 0.31 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Carbon disulfide 3.5 U

3.5 0.26 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Carbon tetrachloride 3.5 U

3.5 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Chlorobenzene 3.5 U

3.5 0.38 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Chlorodibromomethane 3.5 U

3.5 0.60 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Chloroethane 3.5 U

3.5 0.20 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Chloroform 3.5 U

3.5 0.29 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Chloromethane 3.5 U

3.5 0.25 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.5 U

3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.5 U

7.0 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Cyclohexane 7.0 U

3.5 0.20 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Dichlorobromomethane 3.5 U

3.5 0.35 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Dichlorodifluoromethane 3.5 U

3.5 0.18 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Ethylbenzene 3.5 U

3.5 0.35 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Ethylene Dibromide 3.5 U

3.5 0.11 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Isopropylbenzene 3.5 U

7.0 0.98 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Methyl acetate 1.4 J

3.5 0.30 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Methyl tert-butyl ether 3.5 U

7.0 0.22 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Methylcyclohexane 7.0 U

3.5 0.47 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Methylene Chloride 3.5 U

3.5 0.10 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Styrene 3.5 U

3.5 0.36 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Tetrachloroethene 3.5 U

3.5 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Toluene 3.5 U

3.5 0.29 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.5 U

3.5 0.38 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.5 U

3.5 0.29 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Trichloroethene 3.5 U

3.5 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Trichlorofluoromethane 3.5 U

3.5 0.27 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Vinyl chloride 3.5 U

7.0 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1☼Xylenes, Total 7.0 U

TestAmerica Canton

Page 18 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 98 58 - 123 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 1

Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifier Limits%Recovery

4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 91 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 152 - 136

Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 88 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 137 - 132

Toluene-d8 (Surr) 91 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:01 167 - 125

Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)RL MDL

1,1'-Biphenyl 250 U 250 17 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4


740 120 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 740 U


740 98 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 740 U

740 98 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 740 U

1600 100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 1600 U

980 83 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 980 U


250 2.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2-Chloronaphthalene 250 U

250 40 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2-Chlorophenol 250 U

33 2.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2-Methylnaphthalene 33

980 54 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2-Methylphenol 980 U

980 45 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2-Nitroaniline 980 U

250 41 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼2-Nitrophenol 250 U

2000 98 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 2000 U

490 88 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 490 U


740 45 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 740 U

250 64 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 250 U

740 100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 740 U

740 83 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼4-Chloroaniline 740 U

250 64 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 250 U



33 3.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Acenaphthene 33 U

33 1.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Acenaphthylene 33 U

490 45 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Acetophenone 490 U

33 3.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Anthracene 27 J

980 45 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Atrazine 980 U

490 59 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Benzaldehyde 240 J

33 3.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Benzo[a]anthracene 150

33 3.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Benzo[a]pyrene 460

33 2.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 410

33 1.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 500

33 3.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 87

490 47 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 490 U

490 110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 490 U

490 9.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 490 U

340 93 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 340 U

340 49 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 340 U

1600 180 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Caprolactam 1600 U

250 130 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Carbazole 250 U

33 5.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Chrysene 190

TestAmerica Canton

Page 19 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)RL MDL

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 330 33 3.2 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4


250 3.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Dibenzofuran 250 U

340 79 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Diethyl phthalate 340 U

340 83 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Dimethyl phthalate 340 U

340 74 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 340 U

340 39 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 340 U

33 2.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Fluoranthene 200

33 2.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Fluorene 33 U

33 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Hexachlorobenzene 33 U

250 27 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Hexachlorobutadiene 250 U

1600 40 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 1600 U

250 44 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Hexachloroethane 250 U

33 1.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 260

250 64 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Isophorone 250 U

33 4.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Naphthalene 33 U

490 11 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Nitrobenzene 490 U

250 31 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 250 U

250 100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 250 U

740 45 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Pentachlorophenol 740 U

33 3.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Phenanthrene 100

250 36 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Phenol 250 U

33 2.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4☼Pyrene 160

2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 75 10 - 110 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 4


2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 76 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 424 - 110

2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 78 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 424 - 110

Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 73 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 420 - 110

Phenol-d5 (Surr) 77 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 426 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 80 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:49 436 - 110

Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)RL MDL

Aluminum 7500 23 11 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1


1.2 0.45 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Antimony 43

1.2 0.35 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Arsenic 18

23 0.14 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Barium 450

0.58 0.050 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Beryllium 0.68

0.23 0.042 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Cadmium 1.4

580 34 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Calcium 58000

0.58 0.23 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Chromium 37

5.8 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Cobalt 6.2

2.9 0.86 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Copper 62

12 5.7 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Iron 24000

0.70 0.44 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:21 2☼Lead 1100

580 7.5 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Magnesium 7800

1.7 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Manganese 470

4.6 0.63 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Nickel 24

580 7.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Potassium 920

0.58 0.52 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Selenium 0.71

TestAmerica Canton

Page 20 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)RL MDL

Silver 1.0 0.58 0.12 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1


580 77 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Sodium 510 J

1.2 0.64 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Thallium 1.2 U

5.8 0.24 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Vanadium 20

2.3 1.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:55 1☼Zinc 390

Method: 7471A - Mercury (CVAA)RL MDL

Mercury 0.29 0.13 0.020 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 15:32 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 21 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




Date Received: 03/21/14 09:45

Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL

1,1-Dichloroethene 0.025 U 0.025 0.0095 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 1


0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 11,2-Dichloroethane 0.025 U

0.25 0.029 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 12-Butanone (MEK) 0.25 U

0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 1Benzene 0.025 U

0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 1Carbon tetrachloride 0.025 U

0.025 0.0075 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 1Chlorobenzene 0.025 U

0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 1Chloroform 0.025 U

0.025 0.015 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 1Tetrachloroethene 0.025 U

0.025 0.0085 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 1Trichloroethene 0.025 U

0.025 0.011 mg/L 03/31/14 19:41 1Vinyl chloride 0.025 U

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 90 80 - 121 03/31/14 19:41 1


4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 88 03/31/14 19:41 170 - 124

Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 92 03/31/14 19:41 180 - 128

Toluene-d8 (Surr) 101 03/31/14 19:41 180 - 120

TestAmerica Canton

Page 22 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) - TCLPRL MDL

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0040 0.00034 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 1


0.020 0.00030 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U


0.020 0.00025 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 12,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U

0.0040 0.00017 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 12-Methylphenol 0.0040 U

0.040 0.00080 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 13 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U

0.020 0.000085 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 1Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U

0.020 0.00027 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 1Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U

0.020 0.00019 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 1Hexachloroethane 0.020 U

0.0040 0.000040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 1Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U

0.040 0.00027 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 1Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U

0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 1Pyridine 0.020 U






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 72 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 120 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 95 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:49 138 - 110

Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - TCLPRL MDL

Arsenic 0.017 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:31 1


10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:31 1Barium 1.1 J B

0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:31 1Cadmium 0.0074 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:31 1Chromium 0.0062 J

0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:31 1Lead 0.74

0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:31 1Selenium 0.0058 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:31 1Silver 0.50 U

Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - TCLPRL MDL

Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:38 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 23 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






1,1'-Biphenyl 53000 U 53000 3700 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400









53000 480 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼2-Chloronaphthalene 53000 U


7100 530 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼2-Methylnaphthalene 3700 J














7100 810 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Acenaphthene 19000

7100 370 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Acenaphthylene 75000


7100 830 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Anthracene 170000

210000 9700 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Atrazine 210000 U

110000 13000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Benzaldehyde 110000 U

7100 670 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Benzo[a]anthracene 420000

7100 680 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Benzo[a]pyrene 370000

7100 630 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 420000

7100 370 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 200000

7100 730 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 180000



110000 2100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 110000 U




53000 29000 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Carbazole 53000 U

7100 1200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Chrysene 380000

7100 710 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 59000

53000 710 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Dibenzofuran 27000 J





TestAmerica Canton

Page 24 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Fluoranthene 980000 7100 590 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400


7100 570 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Fluorene 67000





7100 370 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 180000


7100 880 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Naphthalene 13000





7100 780 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Phenanthrene 570000

53000 7800 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Phenol 53000 U

7100 470 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400☼Pyrene 800000

2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 0 X 10 - 110 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 400


2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 0 X 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 40024 - 110

2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 0 X 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 40024 - 110

Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 0 X 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 40020 - 110

Phenol-d5 (Surr) 0 X 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 40026 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 0 X 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:32 40036 - 110


Aluminum 5800 50 24 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1


2.5 0.97 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Antimony 11

2.5 0.75 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Arsenic 94

50 0.30 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Barium 3300

1.2 0.11 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Beryllium 0.56 J

0.50 0.090 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Cadmium 6.4

1200 72 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Calcium 60000

1.2 0.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Chromium 330

12 0.40 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Cobalt 6.7 J

6.2 1.8 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Copper 300

25 12 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Iron 95000

0.75 0.47 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Lead 2000

1200 16 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Magnesium 13000

3.7 0.40 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Manganese 860

10 1.3 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Nickel 34

1200 15 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Potassium 850 J

1.2 1.1 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Selenium 5.5

1.2 0.25 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Silver 3.7

1200 160 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Sodium 960 J

2.5 1.4 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Thallium 1.5 J

12 0.52 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:59 1☼Vanadium 24

25 12 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:25 5☼Zinc 4500

TestAmerica Canton

Page 25 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Mercury 57 5.8 0.87 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 17:30 20


TestAmerica Canton

Page 26 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14


















0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 1Pyridine 0.020 U






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 62 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 120 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 83 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:14 138 - 110


Arsenic 0.0098 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:35 1


10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:35 1Barium 0.99 J B

0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:35 1Cadmium 0.54

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:35 1Chromium 0.0043 J

0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:35 1Lead 0.030 J

0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:35 1Selenium 0.0099 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:35 1Silver 0.50 U


Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:40 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 27 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




















11 0.80 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 11 U

11 0.36 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼2-Hexanone 11 U


11 3.6 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Acetone 11 U

2.9 0.13 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Benzene 2.9 U

2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Bromoform 2.9 U

















5.7 0.80 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Methyl acetate 5.7 U



2.9 0.38 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Methylene Chloride 0.53 J

2.9 0.086 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Styrene 2.9 U

2.9 0.30 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Tetrachloroethene 2.9 U *

2.9 0.15 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼Toluene 2.9 U

2.9 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.9 U *






TestAmerica Canton

Page 28 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14









Toluene-d8 (Surr) 96 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:21 167 - 125


1,1'-Biphenyl 16 J 150 10 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5


440 73 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 440 U


440 58 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2,4-Dichlorophenol 440 U

440 58 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2,4-Dimethylphenol 440 U

960 61 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2,4-Dinitrophenol 960 U

580 49 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2,4-Dinitrotoluene 580 U


150 1.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2-Chloronaphthalene 150 U

150 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2-Chlorophenol 150 U

19 1.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2-Methylnaphthalene 47

580 32 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2-Methylphenol 580 U

580 26 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2-Nitroaniline 580 U

150 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼2-Nitrophenol 150 U

1200 58 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼3 & 4 Methylphenol 1200 U

290 52 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 290 U


440 27 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 440 U

150 38 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 150 U

440 61 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 440 U

440 49 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼4-Chloroaniline 440 U

150 38 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 150 U



19 2.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Acenaphthene 120

19 1.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Acenaphthylene 57

290 27 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Acetophenone 290 U

19 2.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Anthracene 300

580 26 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Atrazine 580 U

290 35 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Benzaldehyde 63 J

19 1.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Benzo[a]anthracene 1000

19 1.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Benzo[a]pyrene 1000

19 1.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1400

19 1.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 650

19 2.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 490

290 28 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 290 U

290 64 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 290 U

290 5.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 290 U

200 55 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 200 U

200 29 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Butyl benzyl phthalate 200 U

960 110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Caprolactam 960 U

150 78 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Carbazole 98 J

19 3.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Chrysene 1100

TestAmerica Canton

Page 29 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 180 19 1.9 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5


150 1.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Dibenzofuran 71 J

200 46 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Diethyl phthalate 200 U

200 49 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Dimethyl phthalate 200 U

200 44 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 200 U

200 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 200 U

19 1.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Fluoranthene 2000

19 1.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Fluorene 100

19 6.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Hexachlorobenzene 19 U

150 16 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Hexachlorobutadiene 150 U

960 23 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 960 U

150 26 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Hexachloroethane 150 U

19 1.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 530

150 38 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Isophorone 150 U

19 2.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Naphthalene 80

290 6.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Nitrobenzene 290 U

150 18 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 150 U

150 61 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 150 U

440 26 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Pentachlorophenol 440 U

19 2.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Phenanthrene 1300

150 21 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Phenol 150 U

19 1.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5☼Pyrene 1800

2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 86 10 - 110 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.5


2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 77 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.524 - 110

2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 79 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.524 - 110

Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 75 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.520 - 110

Phenol-d5 (Surr) 79 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.526 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 86 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 20:06 2.536 - 110


Aluminum 5700 19 9.3 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1


0.96 0.38 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Antimony 14

0.96 0.29 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Arsenic 22

19 0.12 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Barium 500

0.48 0.041 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Beryllium 0.34 J

0.19 0.035 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Cadmium 6.8

960 56 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:29 2☼Calcium 57000

0.48 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Chromium 81

4.8 0.15 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Cobalt 4.6 J

4.8 1.4 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:29 2☼Copper 230

9.6 4.7 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Iron 45000

0.58 0.37 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:29 2☼Lead 1600

480 6.3 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Magnesium 9200

1.4 0.15 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Manganese 680

3.9 0.52 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Nickel 14

480 6.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Potassium 770

0.48 0.43 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Selenium 2.3

TestAmerica Canton

Page 30 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Silver 0.23 J 0.48 0.096 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1


480 64 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Sodium 190 J

0.96 0.53 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Thallium 0.96 U

4.8 0.20 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:03 1☼Vanadium 19

3.9 1.9 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:29 2☼Zinc 1300


Mercury 8.0 0.65 0.097 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 17:33 5


TestAmerica Canton

Page 31 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14


















0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 1Pyridine 0.020 U






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 69 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 120 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 88 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 14:38 138 - 110


Arsenic 0.0095 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:40 1


10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:40 1Barium 1.0 J B

0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:40 1Cadmium 0.0093 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:40 1Chromium 0.0041 J

0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:40 1Lead 0.13 J

0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:40 1Selenium 0.0046 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:40 1Silver 0.50 U


Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:41 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 32 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14










0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 20:04 1Benzene 0.025 U



0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 20:04 1Chloroform 0.025 U








Toluene-d8 (Surr) 99 03/31/14 20:04 180 - 120

TestAmerica Canton

Page 33 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Gasoline Range Organics)RL MDL

C6-C10 120 U 120 55 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:28 03/25/14 16:04 1


Trifluorotoluene (Surr) 61 40 - 139 03/25/14 08:28 03/25/14 16:04 1


Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Diesel Range Organics)RL MDL

Diesel Range Organics [C10 - C28] 41 20 11 mg/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 13:12 03/31/14 17:11 1


o-Terphenyl (Surr) 82 40 - 160 03/25/14 13:12 03/31/14 17:11 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 34 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-10Client Sample ID: BW3 1.5-2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 10:45



1,1'-Biphenyl 9.3 J 54 3.8 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1



160 9.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 160 U







54 8.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2-Chlorophenol 54 U

7.2 0.54 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2-Methylnaphthalene 45


220 9.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2-Nitroaniline 220 U

54 8.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼2-Nitrophenol 54 U




160 9.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 160 U







7.2 0.82 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Acenaphthene 24

7.2 0.38 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Acenaphthylene 7.2 U

110 9.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Acetophenone 110 U

7.2 0.84 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Anthracene 17

220 9.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Atrazine 220 U


7.2 0.68 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Benzo[a]anthracene 200

7.2 0.69 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Benzo[a]pyrene 320

7.2 0.64 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Benzo[b]fluoranthene 580

7.2 0.38 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 390

7.2 0.73 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Benzo[k]fluoranthene 170




75 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 35 J B



54 29 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Carbazole 54 U

7.2 1.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Chrysene 270

7.2 0.71 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 95

54 0.71 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Dibenzofuran 17 J




75 8.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Di-n-octyl phthalate 75 U

TestAmerica Canton

Page 35 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Fluoranthene 220 7.2 0.59 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1


7.2 0.57 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Fluorene 6.4 J

7.2 2.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Hexachlorobenzene 7.2 U

54 6.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Hexachlorobutadiene 54 U

360 8.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 360 U

54 9.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Hexachloroethane 54 U

7.2 0.38 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 290


7.2 0.88 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Naphthalene 33

110 2.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Nitrobenzene 110 U

54 6.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 54 U


160 9.8 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Pentachlorophenol 160 U

7.2 0.79 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Phenanthrene 110

54 7.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Phenol 54 U

7.2 0.47 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 1☼Pyrene 190






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 68 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 126 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 87 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 18:24 136 - 110


Aluminum 2600 18 8.6 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1


0.90 0.35 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Antimony 1.3

0.90 0.27 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Arsenic 7.0

18 0.11 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Barium 27

0.45 0.039 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Beryllium 0.11 J

0.18 0.032 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Cadmium 0.39

450 26 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Calcium 7800

0.45 0.18 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Chromium 35

4.5 0.14 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Cobalt 2.5 J

2.2 0.67 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Copper 61

9.0 4.4 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Iron 19000

0.27 0.17 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Lead 18

450 5.8 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Magnesium 3100

1.3 0.14 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Manganese 170

3.6 0.49 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Nickel 25

450 5.6 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Potassium 320 J

0.45 0.40 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Selenium 0.49

0.45 0.090 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Silver 0.45 U

450 59 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Sodium 130 J

0.90 0.49 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Thallium 0.90 U

4.5 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Vanadium 8.5

1.8 0.90 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:07 1☼Zinc 26

TestAmerica Canton

Page 36 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Mercury 0.044 J 0.098 0.015 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 17:35 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 37 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





















15 0.46 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼2-Hexanone 15 U


15 4.6 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Acetone 15 U

3.7 0.17 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Benzene 3.7 U

3.7 0.24 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Bromoform 3.7 U





















3.7 0.11 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Styrene 3.7 U


3.7 0.20 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 1☼Toluene 3.7 U







TestAmerica Canton

Page 38 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14









Toluene-d8 (Surr) 88 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 18:44 167 - 125


1,1'-Biphenyl 6.6 J 59 4.1 ug/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1


























7.9 0.41 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Acenaphthylene 4.4 J


7.9 0.92 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Anthracene 14

240 11 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Atrazine 240 U













59 32 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Carbazole 59 U

7.9 1.3 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Chrysene 210

TestAmerica Canton

Page 39 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 64 7.9 0.78 ug/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1







7.9 0.65 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Fluoranthene 180

7.9 0.63 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Fluorene 6.1 J













59 8.6 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Phenol 59 U

7.9 0.52 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 1☼Pyrene 180






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 68 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 126 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 75 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:19 136 - 110


Aluminum 6500 20 9.8 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1


1.0 0.40 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Antimony 0.74 J

1.0 0.31 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Arsenic 12

20 0.12 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Barium 68 B

0.51 0.044 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Beryllium 0.46 J

0.20 0.037 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Cadmium 0.43

510 30 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Calcium 15000

0.51 0.20 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Chromium 16

5.1 0.16 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Cobalt 4.7 J

2.6 0.76 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Copper 36

10 5.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Iron 22000

0.31 0.19 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Lead 41

510 6.6 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Magnesium 4800

1.5 0.16 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Manganese 400

4.1 0.55 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Nickel 27

510 6.3 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Potassium 720 B

0.51 0.46 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/28/14 13:58 1☼Selenium 0.51 U

TestAmerica Canton

Page 40 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Silver 0.51 U 0.51 0.10 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1


510 67 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Sodium 290 J

1.0 0.56 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Thallium 1.0 U

5.1 0.21 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Vanadium 17

2.0 1.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:31 1☼Zinc 92


Mercury 0.080 J 0.12 0.018 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 09:44 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 41 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14


















0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 1Pyridine 0.020 U






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 52 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 120 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 82 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:03 138 - 110


Arsenic 0.0045 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:44 1


10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:44 1Barium 1.5 J B

0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:44 1Cadmium 0.46

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:44 1Chromium 0.0033 J

0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:44 1Lead 0.029 J

0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:44 1Selenium 0.0050 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:44 1Silver 0.50 U


Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:43 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 42 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-13Client Sample ID: BW3 6-7.5Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 10:55







0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 20:27 1Benzene 0.025 U



0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 20:27 1Chloroform 0.025 U








Toluene-d8 (Surr) 97 03/31/14 20:27 180 - 120

TestAmerica Canton

Page 43 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14










0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 20:50 1Benzene 0.025 U



0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 20:50 1Chloroform 0.025 U








Toluene-d8 (Surr) 97 03/31/14 20:50 180 - 120

TestAmerica Canton

Page 44 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-15Client Sample ID: BW4-2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 13:05





3.2 0.22 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.2 U *





3.2 0.17 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.17 J B *

6.4 0.84 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 6.4 U *

3.2 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene 3.2 U *






13 0.41 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼2-Hexanone 13 U


13 4.1 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Acetone 13 U

3.2 0.15 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Benzene 3.2 U

3.2 0.21 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Bromoform 3.2 U
















3.2 0.10 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Isopropylbenzene 0.60 J





3.2 0.097 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Styrene 3.2 U


3.2 0.17 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 1☼Toluene 0.21 J







TestAmerica Canton

Page 45 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 120 * 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 152 - 136


Toluene-d8 (Surr) 115 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 19:05 167 - 125


1,1'-Biphenyl 40 J 130 9.4 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5


























18 0.94 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Acenaphthylene 18 U

270 25 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Acetophenone 28 J

18 2.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Anthracene 63

540 24 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Atrazine 540 U

270 32 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Benzaldehyde 270 U









190 51 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 190 U



130 72 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Carbazole 130 U

18 3.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Chrysene 1200

TestAmerica Canton

Page 46 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 540 18 1.8 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5







18 1.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Fluoranthene 790

18 1.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Fluorene 21













130 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Phenol 130 U

18 1.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.5☼Pyrene 730






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 63 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.526 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 87 03/25/14 08:44 04/01/14 14:58 2.536 - 110


Aluminum 4500 19 8.9 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1


0.93 0.36 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Antimony 0.78 J

0.93 0.28 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Arsenic 8.8

19 0.11 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Barium 61

0.47 0.040 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Beryllium 0.21 J

0.19 0.033 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Cadmium 0.25

470 27 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Calcium 4700

0.47 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Chromium 34

4.7 0.15 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Cobalt 4.1 J

2.3 0.69 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Copper 58

9.3 4.6 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Iron 30000

0.28 0.18 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Lead 32

470 6.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Magnesium 640

1.4 0.15 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Manganese 620

3.7 0.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Nickel 37

470 5.8 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Potassium 440 J

0.47 0.42 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Selenium 0.54

TestAmerica Canton

Page 47 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Silver 0.47 U 0.47 0.093 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1


470 61 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Sodium 94 J

0.93 0.51 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Thallium 0.93 U

4.7 0.20 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Vanadium 14

1.9 0.93 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:11 1☼Zinc 46


Mercury 0.10 U 0.10 0.016 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 15:42 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 48 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14


















0.020 0.00035 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 1Pyridine 0.020 U






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 52 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 120 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 105 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:35 138 - 110


Arsenic 0.0065 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:48 1


10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:48 1Barium 0.41 J B

0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:48 1Cadmium 0.027 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:48 1Chromium 0.0031 J

0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:48 1Lead 0.0024 J

0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:48 1Selenium 0.0063 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:48 1Silver 0.50 U


Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:48 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 49 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14


















0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 1Pyridine 0.020 U






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 61 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 120 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 89 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 15:51 138 - 110


Arsenic 0.0096 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:52 1


10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:52 1Barium 0.87 J B

0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:52 1Cadmium 0.043 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:52 1Chromium 0.0034 J

0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:52 1Lead 0.12 J

0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:52 1Selenium 0.0053 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:52 1Silver 0.50 U


Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:49 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 50 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






1,1'-Biphenyl 330 U 330 23 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5

























44 5.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Acenaphthene 100

44 2.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Acenaphthylene 32 J


44 5.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Anthracene 210

1300 60 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Atrazine 1300 U













330 180 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Carbazole 330 U

44 7.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Chrysene 1900

44 4.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 720






TestAmerica Canton

Page 51 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Fluoranthene 1700 44 3.7 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5


44 3.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Fluorene 56







44 5.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Naphthalene 100




1000 60 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Pentachlorophenol 300 J


330 48 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Phenol 330 U

44 2.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 5☼Pyrene 1600






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 68 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 526 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 76 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 19:41 536 - 110


Aluminum 6800 24 11 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1


6.0 2.3 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:33 5☼Antimony 6.0 U

1.2 0.36 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Arsenic 36

24 0.14 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Barium 920

0.60 0.051 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Beryllium 2.0

1.2 0.22 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:33 5☼Cadmium 2.6

600 35 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Calcium 21000

0.60 0.24 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Chromium 60

6.0 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Cobalt 12

15 4.4 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:33 5☼Copper 360

60 29 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:33 5☼Iron 150000

1.8 1.1 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:33 5☼Lead 1400

600 7.8 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Magnesium 3100

1.8 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Manganese 790

24 3.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:33 5☼Nickel 56

600 7.4 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Potassium 470 J

0.60 0.54 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Selenium 2.3

0.60 0.12 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Silver 0.60 U

600 79 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Sodium 180 J

1.2 0.66 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Thallium 1.6

30 1.3 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 16:33 5☼Vanadium 23 J

2.4 1.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 19:15 1☼Zinc 1000

TestAmerica Canton

Page 52 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Mercury 6.2 0.73 0.11 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 17:38 5


TestAmerica Canton

Page 53 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Surrogate SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.


Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (58-123) (52-136) (37-132) (67-125)

12DCE BFB DBFM TOL

98 91 88 91240-35317-1

Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)

BW1 4-6

92 79 111 96240-35317-6 BW2 2-4

101 82 86 88240-35317-11 BW3 2-4

109 120 * 94 115240-35317-15 BW4-2-4

91 83 94 90LCS 240-124052/5 Lab Control Sample


83 81 106 92MB 240-123823/3-A Method Blank

96 81 91 90MB 240-124052/6 Method Blank

Surrogate Legend

12DCE = 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr)

BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr)

DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane (Surr)

TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)



12DCE BFB DBFM TOL

84 90 91 100LCS 240-124658/4


Lab Control Sample

Surrogate Legend





Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: TCLPMatrix: Solid


12DCE BFB DBFM TOL

90 88 92 101240-35317-2


BW1 6-8

88 86 84 99240-35317-8 BW2 6-8

88 86 90 97240-35317-13 BW3 6-7.5

88 86 87 97240-35317-14 BW4 0.5-2

84 85 89 97LB 240-124562/1-A MB Method Blank

Surrogate Legend





TestAmerica Canton

Page 54 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (10-110) (24-110) (24-110) (20-110) (26-110) (36-110)

TBP FBP 2FP NBZ PHL TPH

75 76 78 73 77 80240-35317-1


BW1 4-6

0 X 0 X 0 X 0 X0 X 0 X240-35317-4 BW1 10-12

86 77 79 7975 86240-35317-6 BW2 2-4

82 74 64 6863 87240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2

62 71 66 6867 75240-35317-11 BW3 2-4

67 74 59 6362 87240-35317-15 BW4-2-4

77 64 68 6859 76240-35317-18 BW4-8-10

85 75 73 7471 93LCS 240-123851/24-A Lab Control Sample


75 74 74 7671 93MB 240-123851/23-A Method Blank

87 87 83 8588 92MB 240-124042/19-A Method Blank

Surrogate Legend

TBP = 2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr)

FBP = 2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr)

2FP = 2-Fluorophenol (Surr)

NBZ = Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr)

PHL = Phenol-d5 (Surr)

TPH = Terphenyl-d14 (Surr)




86 80 32 85 66 88LCS 240-124411/21-A


Lab Control Sample


77 74 32 6882 89MB 240-124411/20-A Method Blank

77 66 54 4663 92MB 240-124983/6-A Method Blank

Surrogate Legend







Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: TCLPMatrix: Solid



90 81 35 85 72 95240-35317-3


BW1 6-10

77 68 39 6273 83240-35317-5 BW2 1-2

76 73 33 6980 88240-35317-7 BW2 4-8

71 60 25 5264 82240-35317-12 BW3 2-6

95 72 59 5270 105240-35317-16 BW4-2-6

TestAmerica Canton

Page 55 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)Prep Type: TCLPMatrix: Solid



76 73 21 81 61 89240-35317-17


BW4-6-8

Surrogate Legend







Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Gasoline Range Organics)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (40-139)

TFT2

61240-35317-9


BW2 8-9

84LCS 240-123843/2-A Lab Control Sample

72MB 240-123843/1-A Method Blank

Surrogate Legend

TFT = Trifluorotoluene (Surr)

Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Diesel Range Organics)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid


OTPH1

82240-35317-9


BW2 8-9



Surrogate Legend

OTPH = o-Terphenyl (Surr)

TestAmerica Canton

Page 56 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

QC Sample ResultsTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.


Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)

Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-123823/3-A

Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA

Analysis Batch: 124125 Prep Batch: 123823

RL MDL

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.0 U 5.0 0.56 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1

MB MB

Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResult Qualifier

5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

5.0 U 1.35.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane

5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1,2-Trichloroethane

5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1-Dichloroethane

5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,1-Dichloroethene

5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

10 U 1.310 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane

5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2-Dichlorobenzene


5.0 U 0.695.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 11,2-Dichloropropane



20 U 1.420 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 12-Butanone (MEK)

20 U 0.6320 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 12-Hexanone

20 U 0.5420 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)

20 U 6.320 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Acetone

5.0 U 0.235.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Benzene

5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Bromoform

5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Bromomethane

5.0 U 0.445.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Carbon disulfide

5.0 U 0.375.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Carbon tetrachloride

5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chlorobenzene

5.0 U 0.555.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chlorodibromomethane

5.0 U 0.865.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chloroethane

5.0 U 0.295.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chloroform

5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Chloromethane

5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene

5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

10 U 0.3310 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Cyclohexane

5.0 U 0.285.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Dichlorobromomethane

5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Dichlorodifluoromethane

5.0 U 0.265.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Ethylbenzene

5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Ethylene Dibromide

5.0 U 0.165.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Isopropylbenzene

10 U 1.410 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Methyl acetate

5.0 U 0.435.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Methyl tert-butyl ether

10 U 0.3110 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Methylcyclohexane

5.0 U 0.675.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Methylene Chloride

5.0 U 0.155.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Styrene

5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Tetrachloroethene

5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Toluene

5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene

5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

5.0 U 0.425.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Trichloroethene

5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Trichlorofluoromethane

5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Vinyl chloride

10 U 0.3510 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Xylenes, Total

TestAmerica Canton

Page 57 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)





MB MB

Surrogate

03/25/14 04:01

Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery

81 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 52 - 136

106 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 37 - 132

92 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125

Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 240-124052/6


Analysis Batch: 124052

RL MDL

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.0 U 5.0 0.56 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1

MB MB


5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

5.0 U 1.35.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane

5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1,2-Trichloroethane

5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1-Dichloroethane

5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,1-Dichloroethene

0.509 J 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

10 U 1.310 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane

5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2-Dichlorobenzene


5.0 U 0.695.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 11,2-Dichloropropane



20 U 1.420 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 12-Butanone (MEK)

20 U 0.6320 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 12-Hexanone

20 U 0.5420 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)

20 U 6.320 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Acetone

5.0 U 0.235.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Benzene

5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Bromoform

5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Bromomethane

5.0 U 0.445.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Carbon disulfide

5.0 U 0.375.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Carbon tetrachloride

5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chlorobenzene

5.0 U 0.555.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chlorodibromomethane

5.0 U 0.865.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chloroethane

5.0 U 0.295.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chloroform

5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Chloromethane

5.0 U 0.365.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene

5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

10 U 0.3310 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Cyclohexane

5.0 U 0.285.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Dichlorobromomethane

5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Dichlorodifluoromethane

5.0 U 0.265.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Ethylbenzene

5.0 U 0.505.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Ethylene Dibromide

5.0 U 0.165.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Isopropylbenzene

10 U 1.410 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Methyl acetate

5.0 U 0.435.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Methyl tert-butyl ether

10 U 0.3110 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Methylcyclohexane

TestAmerica Canton

Page 58 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

Methylene Chloride 5.0 U 5.0 0.67 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1

MB MB


5.0 U 0.155.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Styrene

5.0 U 0.525.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Tetrachloroethene

5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Toluene

5.0 U 0.415.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene

5.0 U 0.545.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

5.0 U 0.425.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Trichloroethene

5.0 U 0.345.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Trichlorofluoromethane

5.0 U 0.395.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Vinyl chloride

10 U 0.3510 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Xylenes, Total


MB MB

Surrogate Dil FacPrepared AnalyzedQualifier Limits%Recovery

81 03/26/14 13:00 14-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 52 - 136

91 03/26/14 13:00 1Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 37 - 132

90 03/26/14 13:00 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125

Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-124052/5



1,1,1-Trichloroethane 50.0 55.3 ug/Kg 111 77 - 126

Analyte

LCS LCS

DUnitResult Qualifier %Rec

Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.0 50.5 ug/Kg 101 77 - 123

1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroetha

ne

50.0 51.7 ug/Kg 103 80 - 138


1,1-Dichloroethane 50.0 53.2 ug/Kg 106 76 - 120

1,1-Dichloroethene 50.0 52.2 ug/Kg 104 75 - 135

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50.0 49.7 ug/Kg 99 64 - 124

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 50.0 51.2 ug/Kg 102 61 - 132

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 48.6 ug/Kg 97 76 - 120


1,2-Dichloropropane 50.0 48.4 ug/Kg 97 80 - 120



2-Butanone (MEK) 100 91.0 ug/Kg 91 52 - 131

2-Hexanone 100 89.1 ug/Kg 89 64 - 136

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 100 96.0 ug/Kg 96 67 - 135

Acetone 100 98.3 ug/Kg 98 41 - 137

Benzene 50.0 50.4 ug/Kg 101 79 - 120

Bromoform 50.0 48.6 ug/Kg 97 62 - 133

Bromomethane 50.0 62.1 ug/Kg 124 42 - 136

Carbon disulfide 50.0 55.2 ug/Kg 110 62 - 146

Carbon tetrachloride 50.0 60.8 ug/Kg 122 71 - 129

Chlorobenzene 50.0 49.3 ug/Kg 99 78 - 120

Chloroethane 50.0 45.4 ug/Kg 91 58 - 120

Chloroform 50.0 52.4 ug/Kg 105 77 - 120

TestAmerica Canton

Page 59 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







Chloromethane 50.0 42.6 ug/Kg 85 50 - 120

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.0 50.8 ug/Kg 102 76 - 120

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.0 51.3 ug/Kg 103 74 - 128

Cyclohexane 50.0 54.5 ug/Kg 109 66 - 120

Dichlorobromomethane 50.0 51.4 ug/Kg 103 80 - 122

Dichlorodifluoromethane 50.0 36.6 ug/Kg 73 26 - 120

Ethylbenzene 50.0 52.5 ug/Kg 105 79 - 120

Ethylene Dibromide 50.0 49.0 ug/Kg 98 80 - 120

Isopropylbenzene 50.0 55.8 ug/Kg 112 76 - 122

Methyl acetate 250 244 ug/Kg 97 57 - 130

Methyl tert-butyl ether 50.0 49.0 ug/Kg 98 49 - 165

Methylcyclohexane 50.0 51.6 ug/Kg 103 70 - 126

Methylene Chloride 50.0 56.1 ug/Kg 112 75 - 120

m-Xylene & p-Xylene 50.0 51.6 ug/Kg 103 80 - 120

o-Xylene 50.0 52.7 ug/Kg 105 80 - 120

Styrene 50.0 49.3 ug/Kg 99 80 - 120

Tetrachloroethene 50.0 54.2 ug/Kg 108 79 - 120

Toluene 50.0 48.7 ug/Kg 97 75 - 120

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.0 54.2 ug/Kg 108 78 - 120

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.0 52.3 ug/Kg 105 73 - 131

Trichloroethene 50.0 57.1 ug/Kg 114 79 - 120

Trichlorofluoromethane 50.0 43.2 ug/Kg 86 57 - 146

Vinyl chloride 50.0 44.4 ug/Kg 89 57 - 120

Xylenes, Total 100 104 ug/Kg 104 80 - 120

1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (Surr) 58 - 123

Surrogate

91

LCS LCS

Qualifier Limits%Recovery

834-Bromofluorobenzene (Surr) 52 - 136

94Dibromofluoromethane (Surr) 37 - 132

90Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125





Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits



ne

25.0 31.6 ug/Kg 127 80 - 138









TestAmerica Canton

Page 60 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits


2-Butanone (MEK) 50.0 43.2 ug/Kg 86 52 - 131

2-Hexanone 50.0 42.8 ug/Kg 86 64 - 136

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 50.0 44.4 ug/Kg 89 67 - 135

Acetone 50.0 41.2 ug/Kg 82 41 - 137

Benzene 25.0 25.8 ug/Kg 103 79 - 120

Bromoform 25.0 26.4 ug/Kg 106 62 - 133






Chloroform 25.0 24.1 ug/Kg 96 77 - 120










Methyl acetate 125 97.1 ug/Kg 78 57 - 130





o-Xylene 25.0 29.3 ug/Kg 117 80 - 120

Styrene 25.0 26.9 ug/Kg 108 80 - 120

Tetrachloroethene 25.0 30.8 * ug/Kg 123 79 - 120

Toluene 25.0 27.5 ug/Kg 110 75 - 120

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 25.0 30.2 * ug/Kg 121 78 - 120





Xylenes, Total 50.0 58.5 ug/Kg 117 80 - 120


Surrogate

79

LCS LCS





TestAmerica Canton

Page 61 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







1,1-Dichloroethene 1.00 0.886 mg/L 89 71 - 133

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

1,2-Dichloroethane 1.00 0.976 mg/L 98 80 - 120

2-Butanone (MEK) 2.00 1.93 mg/L 96 49 - 120

Benzene 1.00 0.969 mg/L 97 80 - 120

Carbon tetrachloride 1.00 0.988 mg/L 99 54 - 122

Chlorobenzene 1.00 0.970 mg/L 97 80 - 120

Chloroform 1.00 0.908 mg/L 91 80 - 123

Tetrachloroethene 1.00 0.940 mg/L 94 79 - 134

Trichloroethene 1.00 0.962 mg/L 96 78 - 130

Vinyl chloride 1.00 0.792 mg/L 79 56 - 120


Surrogate

84

LCS LCS





Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124562/1-A MB

Matrix: Solid Prep Type: TCLP


RL MDL


MB MB


0.025 U 0.0110.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 11,2-Dichloroethane

0.25 U 0.0290.25 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 12-Butanone (MEK)

0.025 U 0.00650.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Benzene

0.025 U 0.00650.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Carbon tetrachloride

0.025 U 0.00750.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Chlorobenzene

0.025 U 0.00800.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Chloroform

0.025 U 0.0150.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Tetrachloroethene

0.025 U 0.00850.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Trichloroethene

0.025 U 0.0110.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Vinyl chloride


MB MB




97 03/31/14 16:13 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 80 - 120

Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)




RL MDL

1,1'-Biphenyl 50 U 50 3.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1

MB MB


TestAmerica Canton

Page 62 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)




RL MDL

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 150 U 150 25 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1

MB MB


150 U 8.9150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12,4,6-Trichlorophenol

150 U 20150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12,4-Dichlorophenol

150 U 20150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12,4-Dimethylphenol

330 U 21330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12,4-Dinitrophenol

200 U 17200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12,4-Dinitrotoluene


50 U 0.4550 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Chloronaphthalene

50 U 8.250 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Chlorophenol

6.7 U 0.506.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Methylnaphthalene

200 U 11200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Methylphenol

200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Nitroaniline

50 U 8.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Nitrophenol

400 U 20400 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 13 & 4 Methylphenol

100 U 18100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 13,3'-Dichlorobenzidine

200 U 16200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 13-Nitroaniline

150 U 9.2150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol

50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14-Bromophenyl phenyl ether

150 U 21150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14-Chloro-3-methylphenol

150 U 17150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14-Chloroaniline

50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether


330 U 17330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 14-Nitrophenol

6.7 U 0.766.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Acenaphthene

6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Acenaphthylene

100 U 9.2100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Acetophenone

6.7 U 0.786.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Anthracene

200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Atrazine

100 U 12100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzaldehyde

6.7 U 0.636.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzo[a]anthracene

6.7 U 0.646.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzo[a]pyrene

6.7 U 0.596.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzo[b]fluoranthene

6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzo[g,h,i]perylene

6.7 U 0.686.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Benzo[k]fluoranthene

100 U 9.5100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether

100 U 22100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane

100 U 2.0100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether

23.3 J 1970 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate

70 U 1070 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Butyl benzyl phthalate

330 U 37330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Caprolactam

50 U 2750 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Carbazole

6.7 U 1.16.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Chrysene

6.7 U 0.666.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

50 U 0.6650 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Dibenzofuran

70 U 1670 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Diethyl phthalate

70 U 1770 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Dimethyl phthalate

70 U 1570 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Di-n-butyl phthalate

70 U 7.970 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Di-n-octyl phthalate

TestAmerica Canton

Page 63 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

Fluoranthene 6.7 U 6.7 0.55 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1

MB MB


6.7 U 0.536.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Fluorene

6.7 U 2.16.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Hexachlorobenzene

50 U 5.650 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Hexachlorobutadiene

330 U 8.1330 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

50 U 9.050 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Hexachloroethane

6.7 U 0.356.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene

50 U 1350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Isophorone

6.7 U 0.826.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Naphthalene

100 U 2.2100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Nitrobenzene

50 U 6.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine

50 U 2150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1N-Nitrosodiphenylamine

150 U 9.1150 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Pentachlorophenol

6.7 U 0.736.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Phenanthrene

50 U 7.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Phenol

6.7 U 0.446.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Pyrene

2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 75 10 - 110 03/27/14 11:09 1

MB MB

Surrogate

03/25/14 08:44


74 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 24 - 110

74 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 12-Fluorophenol (Surr) 24 - 110

71 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110

76 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110

93 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110

Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 240-123851/24-A



1,1'-Biphenyl 667 511 ug/Kg 77 35 - 110

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 667 564 ug/Kg 85 25 - 110


2,4-Dichlorophenol 667 515 ug/Kg 77 39 - 110

2,4-Dimethylphenol 667 522 ug/Kg 78 29 - 110

2,4-Dinitrophenol 1330 515 ug/Kg 39 10 - 110

2,4-Dinitrotoluene 667 580 ug/Kg 87 48 - 110


2-Chloronaphthalene 667 501 ug/Kg 75 32 - 110

2-Chlorophenol 667 500 ug/Kg 75 37 - 110

2-Methylnaphthalene 667 504 ug/Kg 76 36 - 110

2-Methylphenol 667 494 ug/Kg 74 41 - 110

2-Nitroaniline 667 582 ug/Kg 87 45 - 110

2-Nitrophenol 667 528 ug/Kg 79 34 - 110

3 & 4 Methylphenol 667 523 ug/Kg 78 40 - 110

3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1330 939 ug/Kg 70 28 - 110


4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1330 724 ug/Kg 54 10 - 110

TestAmerica Canton

Page 64 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 667 524 ug/Kg 79 39 - 110

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 667 553 ug/Kg 83 48 - 110

4-Chloroaniline 667 400 ug/Kg 60 30 - 110

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 667 547 ug/Kg 82 40 - 110



Acenaphthene 667 517 ug/Kg 78 38 - 110

Acenaphthylene 667 500 ug/Kg 75 40 - 110

Acetophenone 667 483 ug/Kg 72 40 - 110

Anthracene 667 550 ug/Kg 82 48 - 110

Atrazine 1330 1240 ug/Kg 93 66 - 127

Benzaldehyde 1330 1080 ug/Kg 81 32 - 110

Benzo[a]anthracene 667 547 ug/Kg 82 50 - 110

Benzo[a]pyrene 667 528 ug/Kg 79 44 - 110

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 667 543 ug/Kg 81 43 - 110

Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 667 566 ug/Kg 85 51 - 110

Benzo[k]fluoranthene 667 528 ug/Kg 79 38 - 105

bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether 667 515 ug/Kg 77 29 - 110

Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 667 500 ug/Kg 75 32 - 110

Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 667 483 ug/Kg 72 34 - 110

Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 667 534 ug/Kg 80 50 - 110

Butyl benzyl phthalate 667 569 ug/Kg 85 51 - 110

Caprolactam 1330 1130 ug/Kg 85 44 - 114

Carbazole 667 548 ug/Kg 82 50 - 110

Chrysene 667 510 ug/Kg 77 50 - 110

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 667 521 ug/Kg 78 51 - 110

Dibenzofuran 667 524 ug/Kg 79 43 - 110

Diethyl phthalate 667 566 ug/Kg 85 52 - 110

Dimethyl phthalate 667 552 ug/Kg 83 50 - 110

Di-n-butyl phthalate 667 612 ug/Kg 92 51 - 110

Di-n-octyl phthalate 667 498 ug/Kg 75 48 - 110

Fluoranthene 667 569 ug/Kg 85 51 - 110

Fluorene 667 538 ug/Kg 81 46 - 110

Hexachlorobenzene 667 529 ug/Kg 79 43 - 110

Hexachlorobutadiene 667 490 ug/Kg 73 29 - 110

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 667 399 ug/Kg 60 12 - 110

Hexachloroethane 667 494 ug/Kg 74 30 - 110

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 667 511 ug/Kg 77 50 - 110

Isophorone 667 495 ug/Kg 74 36 - 110

Naphthalene 667 490 ug/Kg 73 36 - 110

Nitrobenzene 667 504 ug/Kg 76 32 - 110

N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 667 516 ug/Kg 77 38 - 110

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1330 1070 ug/Kg 80 46 - 110

Pentachlorophenol 1330 837 ug/Kg 63 10 - 110

Phenanthrene 667 539 ug/Kg 81 49 - 110

Phenol 667 510 ug/Kg 77 38 - 110

Pyrene 667 544 ug/Kg 82 49 - 110

TestAmerica Canton

Page 65 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







2,4,6-Tribromophenol (Surr) 10 - 110

Surrogate

85

LCS LCS


752-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 24 - 110

732-Fluorophenol (Surr) 24 - 110

71Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110

74Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110

93Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110




RL MDL

1,1'-Biphenyl 50 U 50 3.5 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1

MB MB


150 U 25150 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol



























200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Atrazine








TestAmerica Canton

Page 66 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 100 U 100 22 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1

MB MB






50 U 2750 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Carbazole

6.7 U 1.16.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Chrysene





16.2 J 1570 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Di-n-butyl phthalate


6.7 U 0.556.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Fluoranthene

6.7 U 0.536.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Fluorene













50 U 7.350 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Phenol

6.7 U 0.446.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Pyrene


MB MB

Surrogate

03/26/14 10:35





85 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110

92 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110




1,1'-Biphenyl 667 507 ug/Kg 76 35 - 110

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits





TestAmerica Canton

Page 67 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits






















Anthracene 667 469 ug/Kg 70 48 - 110

Atrazine 1330 1100 ug/Kg 82 66 - 127













Carbazole 667 485 ug/Kg 73 50 - 110

Chrysene 667 477 ug/Kg 72 50 - 110








Fluorene 667 507 ug/Kg 76 46 - 110



TestAmerica Canton

Page 68 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits



Isophorone 667 562 ug/Kg 84 36 - 110







Phenol 667 542 ug/Kg 81 38 - 110

Pyrene 667 494 ug/Kg 74 49 - 110


Surrogate

79

LCS LCS










RL MDL


MB MB


0.020 U 0.000300.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 12,4,5-Trichlorophenol


0.020 U 0.000250.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 12,4-Dinitrotoluene

0.0040 U 0.000170.0040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 12-Methylphenol

0.020 U 0.000350.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Pyridine

0.040 U 0.000800.040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 13 & 4 Methylphenol

0.020 U 0.0000850.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Hexachlorobenzene

0.020 U 0.000270.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Hexachlorobutadiene

0.020 U 0.000190.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Hexachloroethane

0.0040 U 0.0000400.0040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Nitrobenzene

0.040 U 0.000270.040 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Pentachlorophenol


MB MB

Surrogate

03/28/14 11:03





68 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110

89 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110

TestAmerica Canton

Page 69 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0800 0.0506 mg/L 63 16 - 110

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.0800 0.0654 mg/L 82 35 - 110


2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.0800 0.0734 mg/L 92 49 - 110

2-Methylphenol 0.0800 0.0641 mg/L 80 36 - 114

Pyridine 0.0800 0.0616 mg/L 77 34 - 110

3 & 4 Methylphenol 0.0800 0.0651 mg/L 81 38 - 110

Hexachlorobenzene 0.0800 0.0599 mg/L 75 44 - 110

Hexachlorobutadiene 0.0800 0.0537 mg/L 67 35 - 110

Hexachloroethane 0.0800 0.0506 mg/L 63 34 - 110

Nitrobenzene 0.0800 0.0708 mg/L 89 43 - 110

Pentachlorophenol 0.160 0.110 mg/L 69 10 - 122


Surrogate

86

LCS LCS










RL MDL


MB MB






0.020 U 0.000350.020 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Pyridine








MB MB

Surrogate

04/02/14 13:47





46 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110

92 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110

TestAmerica Canton

Page 70 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits





Pyridine 0.0800 0.0541 mg/L 68 34 - 110








Surrogate

95

LCS LCS







Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Gasoline Range Organics)




RL MDL

C6-C10 100 U 100 46 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:28 03/25/14 12:18 1

MB MB


Trifluorotoluene (Surr) 72 40 - 139 03/25/14 12:18 1

MB MB

Surrogate

03/25/14 08:28





Trifluorotoluene (Surr) 40 - 139

Surrogate

84

LCS LCS


TestAmerica Canton

Page 71 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Diesel Range Organics)




RL MDL

Diesel Range Organics [C10 - C28] 17 U 17 9.3 mg/Kg 03/25/14 13:12 03/31/14 15:06 1

MB MB


o-Terphenyl (Surr) 72 40 - 160 03/31/14 15:06 1

MB MB

Surrogate

03/25/14 13:12





Diesel Range Organics [C10 -

C28]

83.3 77.0 mg/Kg 92 52 - 120

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

o-Terphenyl (Surr) 40 - 160

Surrogate

91

LCS LCS


Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP)




RL MDL

Aluminum 20 U 20 9.6 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1

MB MB


1.0 U 0.391.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Antimony

1.0 U 0.301.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Arsenic

20 U 0.1220 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Barium

0.50 U 0.0430.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Beryllium

0.20 U 0.0360.20 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Cadmium

500 U 29500 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Calcium

0.50 U 0.200.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Chromium

5.0 U 0.165.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Cobalt

2.5 U 0.742.5 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Copper

10 U 4.910 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Iron

0.30 U 0.190.30 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Lead

500 U 6.5500 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Magnesium

1.5 U 0.161.5 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Manganese

4.0 U 0.544.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Nickel

500 U 6.2500 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Potassium

0.50 U 0.450.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Selenium

0.50 U 0.100.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Silver

500 U 66500 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Sodium

1.0 U 0.551.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Thallium

5.0 U 0.215.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Vanadium

2.0 U 1.02.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Zinc

TestAmerica Canton

Page 72 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) (Continued)




Aluminum 200 191 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Antimony 50.0 42.8 mg/Kg 86 80 - 120

Arsenic 200 177 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120

Barium 200 184 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Beryllium 5.00 4.39 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120

Cadmium 5.00 4.43 mg/Kg 89 80 - 120

Calcium 5000 4400 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120

Chromium 20.0 18.2 mg/Kg 91 80 - 120

Cobalt 50.0 44.1 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120

Copper 25.0 22.7 mg/Kg 91 80 - 120

Iron 100 109 mg/Kg 109 80 - 120

Lead 50.0 43.6 mg/Kg 87 80 - 120

Magnesium 5000 4330 mg/Kg 87 80 - 120

Manganese 50.0 46.1 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Nickel 50.0 44.3 mg/Kg 89 80 - 120

Potassium 5000 4440 mg/Kg 89 80 - 120

Selenium 200 179 mg/Kg 89 80 - 120

Silver 5.00 4.74 mg/Kg 95 80 - 120

Sodium 5000 4480 mg/Kg 90 80 - 120

Thallium 200 180 mg/Kg 90 80 - 120

Vanadium 50.0 43.9 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120

Zinc 50.0 46.9 mg/Kg 94 80 - 120




RL MDL

Aluminum 20 U 20 9.6 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1

MB MB


1.0 U 0.391.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Antimony

1.0 U 0.301.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Arsenic

0.170 J 0.1220 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Barium

0.50 U 0.0430.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Beryllium

0.20 U 0.0360.20 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Cadmium

500 U 29500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Calcium

0.50 U 0.200.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Chromium

5.0 U 0.165.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Cobalt

2.5 U 0.742.5 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Copper

10 U 4.910 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Iron

0.30 U 0.190.30 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Lead

500 U 6.5500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Magnesium

1.5 U 0.161.5 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Manganese

4.0 U 0.544.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Nickel

12.8 J 6.2500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Potassium

0.50 U 0.450.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Selenium

0.50 U 0.100.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Silver

500 U 66500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Sodium

1.0 U 0.551.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Thallium

TestAmerica Canton

Page 73 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

Vanadium 5.0 U 5.0 0.21 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1

MB MB


2.0 U 1.02.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Zinc




Aluminum 200 191 mg/Kg 95 80 - 120

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Antimony 50.0 46.7 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Arsenic 200 188 mg/Kg 94 80 - 120

Barium 200 192 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120

Beryllium 5.00 4.52 mg/Kg 90 80 - 120

Cadmium 5.00 4.76 mg/Kg 95 80 - 120

Calcium 5000 4660 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Chromium 20.0 19.3 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120

Cobalt 50.0 46.0 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Copper 25.0 23.3 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Iron 100 106 mg/Kg 106 80 - 120

Lead 50.0 46.2 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Magnesium 5000 4600 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Manganese 50.0 48.0 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120

Nickel 50.0 46.2 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Potassium 5000 4650 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Selenium 200 183 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Silver 5.00 4.92 mg/Kg 98 80 - 120

Sodium 5000 4670 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Thallium 200 185 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Vanadium 50.0 46.7 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Zinc 50.0 46.1 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120




RL MDL

Arsenic 0.50 U 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1

MB MB


0.000947 J 0.0006710 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Barium

0.10 U 0.000660.10 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Cadmium

0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Chromium

0.50 U 0.00190.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Lead

0.25 U 0.00410.25 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Selenium

0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Silver

TestAmerica Canton

Page 74 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







Arsenic 2.00 1.97 mg/L 98 50 - 150

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Barium 2.00 1.86 J mg/L 93 50 - 150

Cadmium 0.0500 0.0499 J mg/L 100 50 - 150

Chromium 0.200 0.183 J mg/L 91 50 - 150

Lead 0.500 0.423 J mg/L 85 50 - 150

Selenium 2.00 2.13 mg/L 106 50 - 150

Silver 0.0500 0.0517 J mg/L 103 50 - 150

Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124371/1-C



RL MDL

Arsenic 0.50 U 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1

LB LB


0.00176 J 0.0006710 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Barium

0.10 U 0.000660.10 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Cadmium

0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Chromium

0.50 U 0.00190.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Lead

0.25 U 0.00410.25 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Selenium

0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Silver

Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA)




RL MDL

Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:12 1

MB MB





Mercury 0.00500 0.00472 mg/L 94 50 - 150

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124371/1-D



RL MDL

Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:11 1

LB LB


TestAmerica Canton

Page 75 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

Mercury 0.10 U 0.10 0.015 mg/Kg 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 15:07 1

MB MB





Mercury 0.833 0.855 mg/Kg 103 73 - 121

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits




RL MDL

Mercury 0.10 U 0.10 0.015 mg/Kg 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 08:54 1

MB MB





Mercury 0.833 0.856 mg/Kg 103 73 - 121

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

TestAmerica Canton

Page 76 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

QC Association SummaryTestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.


GC/MS VOA

Prep Batch: 123823

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch

Solid 5035240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Total/NA

Solid 5035240-35317-6 BW2 2-4 Total/NA

Solid 5035240-35317-11 BW3 2-4 Total/NA

Solid 5035240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Total/NA

Solid 5035MB 240-123823/3-A Method Blank Total/NA



Solid 8260B 123823240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Total/NA


Solid 8260B 123823240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Total/NA

Solid 8260BLCS 240-124052/5 Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Solid 8260BMB 240-124052/6 Method Blank Total/NA





Solid 8260B 123823MB 240-123823/3-A Method Blank Total/NA

Leach Batch: 124562


Solid 1311240-35317-2 BW1 6-8 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35317-8 BW2 6-8 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35317-13 BW3 6-7.5 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35317-14 BW4 0.5-2 TCLP

Solid 1311LB 240-124562/1-A MB Method Blank TCLP



Solid 8260B 124562240-35317-2 BW1 6-8 TCLP

Solid 8260B 124562240-35317-8 BW2 6-8 TCLP

Solid 8260B 124562240-35317-13 BW3 6-7.5 TCLP

Solid 8260B 124562240-35317-14 BW4 0.5-2 TCLP

Solid 8260B 124562LB 240-124562/1-A MB Method Blank TCLP


GC/MS Semi VOA

Prep Batch: 123851


Solid 3540C240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Total/NA



Solid 3540C240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2 Total/NA

Solid 3540C240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Total/NA

Solid 3540C240-35317-18 BW4-8-10 Total/NA

Solid 3540CLCS 240-123851/24-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Solid 3540CMB 240-123851/23-A Method Blank Total/NA

TestAmerica Canton

Page 77 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



GC/MS Semi VOA (Continued)

Prep Batch: 124042







Solid 8270C 123851LCS 240-123851/24-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Solid 8270C 123851MB 240-123851/23-A Method Blank Total/NA



Solid 8270C 124042240-35317-11 BW3 2-4 Total/NA



Leach Batch: 124371


Solid 1311240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 TCLP

Prep Batch: 124411


Solid 3520C 124371240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 TCLP

Solid 3520C 124371240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 TCLP

Solid 3520C 124371240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 TCLP

Solid 3520C 124371240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 TCLP

Solid 3520C 124371240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 TCLP








Solid 8270C 123851240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2 Total/NA

Solid 8270C 123851240-35317-18 BW4-8-10 Total/NA



Solid 8270C 124411240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 TCLP

Solid 8270C 124411240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 TCLP

Solid 8270C 124411240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 TCLP

Solid 8270C 124411240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 TCLP

Solid 8270C 124411240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 TCLP



TestAmerica Canton

Page 78 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Solid 8270C 123851240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Total/NA

Prep Batch: 124983


Solid 3520C 124371240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 TCLP





Solid 8270C 124983240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 TCLP



GC VOA

Prep Batch: 123843


Solid 5030A240-35317-9 BW2 8-9 Total/NA

Solid 5030ALCS 240-123843/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Solid 5030AMB 240-123843/1-A Method Blank Total/NA






GC Semi VOA

Prep Batch: 123937










Metals

Prep Batch: 123759


Solid 3050B240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Total/NA



Solid 3050B240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2 Total/NA

TestAmerica Canton

Page 79 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Metals (Continued)

Prep Batch: 123759 (Continued)


Solid 3050B240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Total/NA

Solid 3050B240-35317-18 BW4-8-10 Total/NA

Solid 3050BLCS 240-123759/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Solid 3050BMB 240-123759/1-A Method Blank Total/NA

Prep Batch: 123765





Solid 7471A240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2 Total/NA

Solid 7471A240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Total/NA

Solid 7471A240-35317-18 BW4-8-10 Total/NA





Solid 7471A 123765240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Total/NA



Solid 7471A 123765240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2 Total/NA

Solid 7471A 123765240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Total/NA

Solid 7471A 123765240-35317-18 BW4-8-10 Total/NA

Solid 7471A 123765LCS 240-123765/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Solid 7471A 123765MB 240-123765/1-A Method Blank Total/NA







Solid 6010B 123759LCS 240-123759/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA


Prep Batch: 124048





Prep Batch: 124076








TestAmerica Canton

Page 80 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Metals (Continued)

Analysis Batch: 124159 (Continued)




Solid 6010B 123759240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2 Total/NA













Leach Batch: 124371


Solid 1311240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 TCLP

Solid 1311LB 240-124371/1-C Method Blank TCLP

Solid 1311LB 240-124371/1-D Method Blank TCLP

Prep Batch: 124402


Solid 3010A 124371240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 TCLP

Solid 3010A 124371240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 TCLP

Solid 3010A 124371240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 TCLP

Solid 3010A 124371240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 TCLP

Solid 3010A 124371240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 TCLP

Solid 3010A 124371240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 TCLP

Solid 3010A 124371LB 240-124371/1-C Method Blank TCLP



Prep Batch: 124406


Solid 7470A 124371240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124371240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124371240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124371240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124371240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124371240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124371LB 240-124371/1-D Method Blank TCLP


TestAmerica Canton

Page 81 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Metals (Continued)









Solid 6010B 124402240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 TCLP

Solid 6010B 124402240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 TCLP

Solid 6010B 124402240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 TCLP

Solid 6010B 124402240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 TCLP

Solid 6010B 124402240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 TCLP

Solid 6010B 124402240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 TCLP

Solid 6010B 124402LB 240-124371/1-C Method Blank TCLP





Solid 7470A 124406240-35317-3 BW1 6-10 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124406240-35317-5 BW2 1-2 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124406240-35317-7 BW2 4-8 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124406240-35317-12 BW3 2-6 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124406240-35317-16 BW4-2-6 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124406240-35317-17 BW4-6-8 TCLP




General Chemistry



Solid Moisture240-35317-1 BW1 4-6 Total/NA




Solid Moisture240-35317-10 BW3 1.5-2 Total/NA


Solid Moisture240-35317-15 BW4-2-4 Total/NA

Solid Moisture240-35317-18 BW4-8-10 Total/NA

Solid Moisture240-35317-18 DU BW4-8-10 Total/NA

TestAmerica Canton

Page 82 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Lab ChronicleClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1


Client Sample ID: BW1 4-6 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-1Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 08:00


Prep 5035 03/21/14 17:00 TJL2123823 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch

MethodPrep Type LabAnalystRun

Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA

Analysis 8260B 1 124052 03/26/14 18:01 SAM TAL CANTotal/NA

Prep 3540C 123851 03/25/14 08:44 MPM TAL CANTotal/NA

Analysis 8270C 4 124557 03/31/14 18:49 JMG TAL CANTotal/NA

Prep 3050B 123759 03/24/14 13:34 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA

Analysis 6010B 2 124034 03/25/14 16:21 RKT TAL CANTotal/NA



Prep 7471A 123765 03/24/14 16:00 DEE TAL CANTotal/NA

Analysis 7471A 1 123972 03/25/14 15:32 AMM2 TAL CANTotal/NA

Analysis Moisture 1 123573 03/22/14 14:42 BLW TAL CANTotal/NA



Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP

Analysis 8260B 1 124658 03/31/14 19:41 RJQ TAL CANTCLP



Leach 1311 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ124371 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP

Prep 3520C 124411 03/28/14 11:03 RTR TAL CANTCLP

Analysis 8270C 1 124718 04/01/14 13:49 MRU TAL CANTCLP

Leach 1311 124371 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ TAL CANTCLP

Prep 3010A 124402 03/28/14 10:27 LPM TAL CANTCLP

Analysis 6010B 1 124634 03/31/14 11:31 KLC TAL CANTCLP



Analysis 7470A 1 124650 03/31/14 12:38 AMM2 TAL CANTCLP



Prep 3540C 03/25/14 08:44 MPM123851 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA



TestAmerica Canton

Page 83 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Analysis 6010B 03/25/14 16:25 RKT5 124034 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA








Leach 1311 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ124371 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP











Prep 5035 03/21/14 17:00 TJL2123823 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA

Analysis 8260B 1 124125 03/27/14 05:21 TJL2 TAL CANTotal/NA


Analysis 8270C 2.5 124557 03/31/14 20:06 JMG TAL CANTotal/NA








TestAmerica Canton

Page 84 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Leach 1311 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ124371 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP











Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP




Prep 5030A 03/25/14 08:28 KMG123843 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA

Analysis 8015C 1 123857 03/25/14 16:04 KMG TAL CANTotal/NA


Analysis 8015C 1 124637 03/31/14 17:11 DEB TAL CANTotal/NA


Client Sample ID: BW3 1.5-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-10Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 10:45


Prep 3540C 03/25/14 08:44 MPM123851 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA







TestAmerica Canton

Page 85 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Prep 5035 03/21/14 17:00 TJL2123823 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA



Analysis 8270C 1 124330 03/28/14 17:19 MRU TAL CANTotal/NA




Analysis 6010B 1 124432 03/28/14 13:58 KLC TAL CANTotal/NA






Leach 1311 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ124371 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP









Client Sample ID: BW3 6-7.5 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-13Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 10:55


Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP


Client Sample ID: BW4 0.5-2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-14Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 13:00


Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP


TestAmerica Canton

Page 86 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Client Sample ID: BW4-2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35317-15Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/20/14 13:05


Prep 5035 03/21/14 17:00 TJL2123823 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA











Leach 1311 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ124371 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP

Prep 3520C 124983 04/02/14 13:47 CSC TAL CANTCLP

Analysis 8270C 1 125096 04/03/14 17:35 JMG TAL CANTCLP









Leach 1311 03/28/14 08:52 DRJ124371 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP









TestAmerica Canton

Page 87 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Prep 3540C 03/25/14 08:44 MPM123851 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA











TestAmerica Canton

Page 88 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Certification SummaryClient: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc. TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35317-1


Laboratory: TestAmerica CantonAll certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all certifications are applicable to this report.

Authority Program EPA Region Certification ID Expiration Date

California 01144CA9NELAP 06-30-14

Connecticut State Program 1 PH-0590 12-31-14

Florida NELAP 4 E87225 06-30-14

Georgia State Program 4 N/A 06-30-14

Illinois NELAP 5 200004 07-31-14

Kansas NELAP 7 E-10336 03-31-14 *

Kentucky (UST) State Program 4 58 06-30-14

L-A-B DoD ELAP L2315 07-18-16

Minnesota NELAP 5 039-999-348 12-31-14

Nevada State Program 9 OH-000482008A 07-31-14

New Jersey NELAP 2 OH001 06-30-14

New York NELAP 2 10975 03-31-14 *

Ohio VAP State Program 5 CL0024 10-31-15

Pennsylvania NELAP 3 68-00340 08-31-14

Texas NELAP 6 08-31-14

USDA Federal P330-13-00319 11-26-16

Virginia NELAP 3 460175 09-14-14

Washington State Program 10 C971 01-12-15

West Virginia DEP State Program 3 210 12-31-14

Wisconsin State Program 5 999518190 08-31-14

TestAmerica Canton

* Expired certification is currently pending renewal and is considered valid.

Page 89 of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

of 93 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Appendix F

Soil analytical results for borings BW-5 and BW-6









1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Table of Contents




4/4/2014

Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1



Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8






Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56


Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Qualifiers

GC/MS VOA



Qualifier




GC/MS Semi VOA



Qualifier




Metals



Qualifier


4 MS, MSD: The analyte present in the original sample is greater than 4 times the matrix spike concentration; therefore, control limits are not

applicable.

F1 MS and/or MSD Recovery exceeds the control limits

F2 MS/MSD RPD exceeds control limits


Glossary



Abbreviation

%R Percent Recovery











NC Not Calculated



QC Quality Control






TestAmerica Canton

Page 3 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Job ID: 240-35316-1


Narrative

CASE NARRATIVE




















method header.


RECEIPT




Samples BW5 4-6 (240-35316-3) and BW6 6-8 (240-35316-8) were analyzed for TCLP volatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance

with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/8260B. The samples were leached on 03/30/2014 and analyzed on 03/31/2014.



Samples BW5 4-6 (240-35316-3) and BW6 1-2 (240-35316-6) were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with

EPA SW-846 Method 8260B. The samples were prepared on 03/21/2014 and analyzed on 03/26/2014 and 03/27/2014.





1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








with batch 124125.



Samples BW5 2-5 (240-35316-2), BW5 6-9 (240-35316-4), BW6 4-6 (240-35316-7) and BW6 6-8 (240-35316-9) were analyzed for TCLP

semivolatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/8270C. The samples were leached on

03/27/2014, prepared on 03/28/2014 and 04/02/2014 and analyzed on 04/01/2014 and 04/03/2014.



No difficulties were encountered during the SVOCs analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.


Samples BW5 1-2 (240-35316-1), BW5 10-11 (240-35316-5), BW6 1-2 (240-35316-6) and BW6 4-6 (240-35316-7) were analyzed for

semivolatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8270C. The samples were prepared on 03/25/2014

and analyzed on 03/27/2014 and 03/31/2014.



Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was detected in method blank MB 240-123851/23-A at a level that was above the method detection limit but

below the reporting limit. The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result

above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.

2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr), Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr), Phenol-d5 (Surr) and Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) failed the surrogate recovery criteria low for

BW5 10-11 (240-35316-5). Refer to the QC report for details.

Samples BW5 1-2 (240-35316-1)[2X] and BW5 10-11 (240-35316-5)[5X] required dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been

adjusted accordingly.


TCLP METALS (ICP)


metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/6010B. The samples were leached on 03/27/2014, prepared on 03/28/2014

and analyzed on 03/31/2014.

Barium was detected in method blanks LB 240-124371/1-C and MB 240-124402/2-A at levels that were above the method detection limit

but below the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged. If the associated sample reported a

result above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged.


TOTAL METALS (ICP)

Samples BW5 1-2 (240-35316-1), BW5 10-11 (240-35316-5), BW6 1-2 (240-35316-6) and BW6 4-6 (240-35316-7) were analyzed for total

metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 6010B. The samples were prepared on 03/24/2014 and analyzed on 03/25/2014,

03/26/2014 and 03/27/2014.

Antimony, Calcium, Magnesium and Manganese failed the recovery criteria low for the MS of sample BW5 1-2MS (240-35316-1) in batch


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





240-124034. Aluminum and Iron failed the recovery criteria high.

For the MSD of sample BW5 1-2MSD (240-35316-1) in batch 240-124034, Several analytes failed the recovery criteria low. Aluminum

failed the recovery criteria high. Also, Calcium, Lead and Magnesium exceeded the RPD limit.


TCLP MERCURY


mercury in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/7470A. The samples were leached on 03/27/2014, prepared on 03/28/2014 and

analyzed on 03/31/2014.


TOTAL MERCURY


mercury in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 7471A. The samples were prepared on 03/24/2014 and analyzed on 03/25/2014.


PERCENT SOLIDS

Samples BW5 1-2 (240-35316-1), BW5 4-6 (240-35316-3), BW5 10-11 (240-35316-5), BW6 1-2 (240-35316-6) and BW6 4-6

(240-35316-7) were analyzed for percent solids in accordance with EPA Method 160.3 MOD. The samples were analyzed on 03/22/2014.



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14















TestAmerica Canton

Page 7 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




240-35316-1 BW5 1-2 Solid 03/20/14 14:15 03/21/14 09:45

240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 Solid 03/20/14 14:18 03/21/14 09:45

240-35316-3 BW5 4-6 Solid 03/20/14 14:20 03/21/14 09:45

240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 Solid 03/20/14 14:25 03/21/14 09:45

240-35316-5 BW5 10-11 Solid 03/20/14 14:30 03/21/14 09:45

240-35316-6 BW6 1-2 Solid 03/20/14 15:15 03/21/14 09:45

240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 Solid 03/20/14 15:22 03/21/14 09:45

240-35316-8 BW6 6-8 Solid 03/20/14 15:40 03/21/14 09:45

240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 Solid 03/20/14 15:42 03/21/14 09:45

TestAmerica Canton

Page 8 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




☼1,1'-Biphenyl

RL

110 ug/Kg

MDL

7.7


Total/NA2J33 8270C



☼Acenaphthylene 15 ug/Kg0.77 Total/NA215 8270C







☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 220 ug/Kg4.4 Total/NA225 J 8270C































Arsenic

RL

0.50 mg/L

MDL

0.0032


TCLP1J0.0078 6010B




Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP12.8 6010B


TestAmerica Canton


Page 9 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

RL

2.4 ug/Kg

MDL

0.13


Total/NA1J B0.27 8260B

☼Acetone 9.7 ug/Kg3.0 Total/NA19.5 J 8260B

☼Styrene 2.4 ug/Kg0.072 Total/NA10.093 J 8260B


Arsenic

RL

0.50 mg/L

MDL

0.0032


TCLP1J0.012 6010B




Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.71 6010B




RL

76 ug/Kg

MDL

5.7


Total/NA596 8270C

☼Acenaphthene 76 ug/Kg8.7 Total/NA555 J 8270C







☼Chrysene 76 ug/Kg13 Total/NA59500 8270C

















☼Cobalt 11 mg/Kg0.36 Total/NA111 6010B




☼Magnesium 1100 mg/Kg14 Total/NA13700 6010B



☼Potassium 1100 mg/Kg14 Total/NA11700 6010B

TestAmerica Canton


Page 10 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




☼Selenium

RL

1.1 mg/Kg

MDL

1.0


Total/NA14.7 6010B



☼Thallium 2.2 mg/Kg1.2 Total/NA11.2 J 6010B

☼Vanadium 11 mg/Kg0.47 Total/NA130 6010B





RL

7.4 ug/Kg

MDL

0.56


Total/NA128 8270C



















☼Cadmium 0.20 mg/Kg0.036 Total/NA10.16 J 6010B


☼Chromium 0.50 mg/Kg0.20 Total/NA18.9 6010B




☼Lead 0.30 mg/Kg0.19 Total/NA19.2 6010B



☼Nickel 4.0 mg/Kg0.54 Total/NA17.7 6010B







☼1,1'-Biphenyl

RL

55 ug/Kg

MDL

3.9


Total/NA1J6.7 8270C

TestAmerica Canton


Page 11 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





RL

7.3 ug/Kg

MDL

0.55


Total/NA133 8270C








☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 77 ug/Kg21 Total/NA1100 B 8270C




☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 77 ug/Kg17 Total/NA121 J 8270C























☼Sodium 400 mg/Kg53 Total/NA1490 6010B



Arsenic 0.50 mg/L0.0032 TCLP10.0053 J 6010B







No Detections.


TestAmerica Canton


Page 12 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




Arsenic

RL

0.50 mg/L

MDL

0.0032


TCLP1J0.0047 6010B





TestAmerica Canton


Page 13 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






1,1'-Biphenyl 33 J 110 7.7 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2


























15 0.77 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Acenaphthylene 15


15 1.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Anthracene 84

440 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Atrazine 440 U









220 4.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 25 J




110 59 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Carbazole 110 U

15 2.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Chrysene 760







TestAmerica Canton

Page 14 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








15 1.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Fluorene 21

15 4.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Hexachlorobenzene 15 U












110 16 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Phenol 110 U

15 0.97 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 2☼Pyrene 690






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 74 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 226 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 83 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:54 236 - 110


Aluminum 4000 19 9.0 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1


0.93 0.36 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Antimony 0.69 J

0.93 0.28 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Arsenic 11

19 0.11 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Barium 32

0.47 0.040 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Beryllium 0.27 J

0.19 0.034 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Cadmium 0.53

470 27 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Calcium 36000

0.47 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Chromium 19

4.7 0.15 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Cobalt 5.2

2.3 0.69 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Copper 40

9.3 4.6 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Iron 22000

0.28 0.18 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Lead 25

470 6.1 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Magnesium 11000

1.4 0.15 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Manganese 370

3.7 0.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Nickel 44

470 5.8 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Potassium 730

0.47 0.42 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Selenium 0.47 U

0.47 0.093 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Silver 0.47 U

470 62 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Sodium 77 J

0.93 0.51 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Thallium 0.93 U

4.7 0.20 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Vanadium 14

1.9 0.93 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 14:03 1☼Zinc 71

TestAmerica Canton

Page 15 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Mercury 0.051 J 0.11 0.017 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 15:11 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 16 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14


















0.020 0.00035 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 1Pyridine 0.020 U






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 60 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 120 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 102 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 16:20 138 - 110


Arsenic 0.0078 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:14 1


10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:14 1Barium 1.3 J B

0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:14 1Cadmium 0.035 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:14 1Chromium 0.0042 J

0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:14 1Lead 2.8

0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:14 1Selenium 0.0085 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:14 1Silver 0.50 U


Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:52 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 17 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14













2.4 0.13 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.27 J B







9.7 0.68 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 9.7 U

9.7 0.30 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼2-Hexanone 9.7 U

9.7 0.26 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 9.7 U

9.7 3.0 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Acetone 9.5 J

2.4 0.11 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Benzene 2.4 U

2.4 0.16 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Bromoform 2.4 U





















2.4 0.072 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Styrene 0.093 J


2.4 0.13 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 1☼Toluene 2.4 U







TestAmerica Canton

Page 18 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14









Toluene-d8 (Surr) 90 03/21/14 17:00 03/26/14 17:18 167 - 125






0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 18:54 1Benzene 0.025 U



0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 18:54 1Chloroform 0.025 U








Toluene-d8 (Surr) 99 03/31/14 18:54 180 - 120

TestAmerica Canton

Page 19 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14


















0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 1Pyridine 0.020 U






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 67 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 120 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 81 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 12:36 138 - 110


Arsenic 0.012 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:18 1


10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:18 1Barium 1.2 J B

0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:18 1Cadmium 0.16

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:18 1Chromium 0.0067 J

0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:18 1Lead 0.71

0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:18 1Selenium 0.0081 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:18 1Silver 0.50 U


Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:33 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 20 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






1,1'-Biphenyl 570 U 570 40 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5

























76 8.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Acenaphthene 55 J

76 4.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Acenaphthylene 76 U


76 8.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Anthracene 300

2300 100 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Atrazine 2300 U













570 310 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Carbazole 570 U

76 13 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Chrysene 9500







TestAmerica Canton

Page 21 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








76 6.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Fluorene 100













570 83 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Phenol 570 U

76 5.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 5☼Pyrene 2300



2-Fluorobiphenyl (Surr) 17 X 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 524 - 110


Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 19 X 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 520 - 110

Phenol-d5 (Surr) 24 X 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:29 526 - 110



Aluminum 11000 44 21 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1


2.2 0.87 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Antimony 0.97 J

2.2 0.67 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Arsenic 34

44 0.27 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Barium 220

1.1 0.096 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Beryllium 0.80 J

0.44 0.080 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Cadmium 6.5

1100 65 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Calcium 19000

1.1 0.44 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Chromium 120

11 0.36 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Cobalt 11

5.6 1.6 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Copper 77

22 11 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Iron 91000

0.67 0.42 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Lead 260

1100 14 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Magnesium 3700

3.3 0.36 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Manganese 760

8.9 1.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Nickel 36

1100 14 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Potassium 1700

1.1 1.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Selenium 4.7

1.1 0.22 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Silver 0.96 J

1100 150 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Sodium 210 J

2.2 1.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Thallium 1.2 J

11 0.47 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Vanadium 30

4.4 2.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:35 1☼Zinc 700

TestAmerica Canton

Page 22 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Mercury 1.1 0.24 0.036 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 15:24 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 23 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





















14 0.44 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼2-Hexanone 14 U


14 4.4 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Acetone 14 U

3.5 0.16 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Benzene 3.5 U

3.5 0.23 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Bromoform 3.5 U





















3.5 0.10 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Styrene 3.5 U

3.5 0.36 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Tetrachloroethene 3.5 U *

3.5 0.19 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼Toluene 3.5 U

3.5 0.28 ug/Kg 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.5 U *






TestAmerica Canton

Page 24 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14









Toluene-d8 (Surr) 95 03/21/14 17:00 03/27/14 05:00 167 - 125


1,1'-Biphenyl 56 U 56 3.9 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1

























7.4 0.85 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Acenaphthene 7.4 U



7.4 0.87 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Anthracene 7.4 U

220 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Atrazine 220 U













56 30 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Carbazole 56 U

7.4 1.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Chrysene 65

TestAmerica Canton

Page 25 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 240 7.4 0.73 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1







7.4 0.61 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Fluoranthene 16

7.4 0.59 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Fluorene 7.4 U













56 8.1 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Phenol 56 U

7.4 0.49 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 1☼Pyrene 14






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 62 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 126 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 83 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 20:03 136 - 110


Aluminum 4700 20 9.7 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1


1.0 0.39 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Antimony 1.0 U

1.0 0.30 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Arsenic 3.6

20 0.12 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Barium 22

0.50 0.043 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Beryllium 0.17 J

0.20 0.036 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Cadmium 0.16 J

500 29 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Calcium 2600

0.50 0.20 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Chromium 8.9

5.0 0.16 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Cobalt 2.6 J

2.5 0.74 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Copper 10

10 4.9 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Iron 9900

0.30 0.19 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Lead 9.2

500 6.5 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Magnesium 970

1.5 0.16 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Manganese 150

4.0 0.54 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Nickel 7.7

500 6.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Potassium 650

0.50 0.45 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/27/14 15:15 1☼Selenium 1.4

TestAmerica Canton

Page 26 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Silver 0.50 U 0.50 0.10 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1


500 66 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Sodium 350 J

1.0 0.55 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Thallium 1.0 U

5.0 0.21 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Vanadium 12

2.0 1.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:39 1☼Zinc 19


Mercury 0.12 U 0.12 0.018 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 15:27 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 27 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






1,1'-Biphenyl 6.7 J 55 3.9 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1




























7.3 0.86 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Anthracene 21

220 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Atrazine 220 U










77 21 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 100 B



55 30 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Carbazole 55 U

7.3 1.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Chrysene 180





77 17 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 21 J


TestAmerica Canton

Page 28 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








7.3 0.58 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Fluorene 7.3 U




55 9.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Hexachloroethane 55 U









55 8.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Phenol 55 U

7.3 0.48 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 1☼Pyrene 190






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 78 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 126 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 87 03/25/14 08:44 03/31/14 17:58 136 - 110














0.020 0.00035 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 1Pyridine 0.020 U






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 60 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 120 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 105 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 17:10 138 - 110

TestAmerica Canton

Page 29 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Aluminum 4600 16 7.7 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1


0.80 0.31 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Antimony 0.51 J

0.80 0.24 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Arsenic 6.8

16 0.096 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Barium 27

0.40 0.034 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Beryllium 0.25 J

0.16 0.029 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Cadmium 1.9

400 23 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Calcium 28000

0.40 0.16 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Chromium 19

4.0 0.13 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Cobalt 3.3 J

2.0 0.59 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Copper 21

8.0 3.9 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Iron 15000

0.24 0.15 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Lead 14

400 5.2 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Magnesium 6300

1.2 0.13 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Manganese 220

3.2 0.43 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Nickel 14

400 5.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Potassium 660

0.40 0.36 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Selenium 0.83

0.40 0.080 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Silver 0.40 U

400 53 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Sodium 490

0.80 0.44 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Thallium 0.80 U

4.0 0.17 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Vanadium 15

1.6 0.80 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/26/14 18:51 1☼Zinc 34


Arsenic 0.0053 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:22 1


10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:22 1Barium 0.22 J B

0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:22 1Cadmium 0.0075 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:22 1Chromium 0.0030 J

0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:22 1Lead 0.50 U

0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:22 1Selenium 0.0064 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:22 1Silver 0.50 U


Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:35 1



Mercury 0.017 J 0.11 0.016 mg/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 15:29 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 30 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14










0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 19:17 1Benzene 0.025 U



0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 19:17 1Chloroform 0.025 U








Toluene-d8 (Surr) 99 03/31/14 19:17 180 - 120

TestAmerica Canton

Page 31 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14


















0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 1Pyridine 0.020 U






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 64 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 120 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 90 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 13:25 138 - 110


Arsenic 0.0047 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:27 1


10 0.00067 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:27 1Barium 0.53 J B

0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:27 1Cadmium 0.0020 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:27 1Chromium 0.0026 J

0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:27 1Lead 0.50 U

0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:27 1Selenium 0.0069 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 11:27 1Silver 0.50 U


Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:36 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 32 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





12DCE BFB DBFM TOL

111 80 95 90240-35316-3


BW5 4-6

88 80 107 95240-35316-6 BW6 1-2



83 81 106 92MB 240-123823/3-A Method Blank

96 81 91 90MB 240-124052/6 Method Blank

Surrogate Legend







12DCE BFB DBFM TOL

84 90 91 100LCS 240-124658/4


Lab Control Sample

Surrogate Legend







12DCE BFB DBFM TOL

88 85 88 99240-35316-3


BW5 4-6

90 88 91 99240-35316-8 BW6 6-8


Surrogate Legend








70 74 72 70 74 83240-35316-1


BW5 1-2

TestAmerica Canton

Page 33 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Method: 8270C - Semivolatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid



22 17 X 26 19 X 24 X 18 X240-35316-5


BW5 10-11

66 67 57 6259 83240-35316-6 BW6 1-2

80 81 75 7874 87240-35316-7 BW6 4-6


75 74 74 7671 93MB 240-123851/23-A Method Blank

Surrogate Legend










86 80 32 85 66 88LCS 240-124411/21-A


Lab Control Sample


77 74 32 6882 89MB 240-124411/20-A Method Blank

77 66 54 4663 92MB 240-124983/6-A Method Blank

Surrogate Legend










92 81 70 77 60 102240-35316-2


BW5 2-5

103 89 70 5885 106240-35316-2 MS BW5 2-5

57 72 43 6779 81240-35316-4 BW5 6-9

98 76 61 6073 105240-35316-7 BW6 4-6

83 74 18 6477 90240-35316-9 BW6 6-8

Surrogate Legend





TestAmerica Canton

Page 34 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





TestAmerica Canton

Page 35 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL


MB MB















20 U 0.6320 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 12-Hexanone


20 U 6.320 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Acetone

5.0 U 0.235.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Benzene

5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Bromoform





















5.0 U 0.155.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Styrene


5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Toluene







TestAmerica Canton

Page 36 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








MB MB

Surrogate

03/25/14 04:01




92 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125




RL MDL


MB MB















20 U 0.6320 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 12-Hexanone


20 U 6.320 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Acetone

5.0 U 0.235.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Benzene

5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Bromoform




















TestAmerica Canton

Page 37 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

Methylene Chloride 5.0 U 5.0 0.67 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1

MB MB


5.0 U 0.155.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Styrene


5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Toluene








MB MB




90 03/26/14 13:00 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125





Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits



ne

50.0 51.7 ug/Kg 103 80 - 138












2-Hexanone 100 89.1 ug/Kg 89 64 - 136


Acetone 100 98.3 ug/Kg 98 41 - 137

Benzene 50.0 50.4 ug/Kg 101 79 - 120

Bromoform 50.0 48.6 ug/Kg 97 62 - 133






Chloroform 50.0 52.4 ug/Kg 105 77 - 120

TestAmerica Canton

Page 38 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits














o-Xylene 50.0 52.7 ug/Kg 105 80 - 120

Styrene 50.0 49.3 ug/Kg 99 80 - 120


Toluene 50.0 48.7 ug/Kg 97 75 - 120








Surrogate

91

LCS LCS









Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits



ne

25.0 31.6 ug/Kg 127 80 - 138









TestAmerica Canton

Page 39 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits



2-Hexanone 50.0 42.8 ug/Kg 86 64 - 136


Acetone 50.0 41.2 ug/Kg 82 41 - 137

Benzene 25.0 25.8 ug/Kg 103 79 - 120

Bromoform 25.0 26.4 ug/Kg 106 62 - 133






Chloroform 25.0 24.1 ug/Kg 96 77 - 120















o-Xylene 25.0 29.3 ug/Kg 117 80 - 120

Styrene 25.0 26.9 ug/Kg 108 80 - 120


Toluene 25.0 27.5 ug/Kg 110 75 - 120








Surrogate

79

LCS LCS





TestAmerica Canton

Page 40 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits


2-Butanone (MEK) 2.00 1.93 mg/L 96 49 - 120

Benzene 1.00 0.969 mg/L 97 80 - 120



Chloroform 1.00 0.908 mg/L 91 80 - 123





Surrogate

84

LCS LCS








RL MDL


MB MB



0.25 U 0.0290.25 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 12-Butanone (MEK)

0.025 U 0.00650.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Benzene



0.025 U 0.00800.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Chloroform





MB MB




97 03/31/14 16:13 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 80 - 120





RL MDL

1,1'-Biphenyl 50 U 50 3.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1

MB MB


TestAmerica Canton

Page 41 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 150 U 150 25 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1

MB MB




























200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Atrazine













50 U 2750 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Carbazole

6.7 U 1.16.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Chrysene







TestAmerica Canton

Page 42 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

Fluoranthene 6.7 U 6.7 0.55 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1

MB MB


6.7 U 0.536.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Fluorene













50 U 7.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Phenol

6.7 U 0.446.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Pyrene


MB MB

Surrogate

03/25/14 08:44





76 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110

93 03/25/14 08:44 03/27/14 11:09 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110




1,1'-Biphenyl 667 511 ug/Kg 77 35 - 110

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits


















TestAmerica Canton

Page 43 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits









Anthracene 667 550 ug/Kg 82 48 - 110

Atrazine 1330 1240 ug/Kg 93 66 - 127













Carbazole 667 548 ug/Kg 82 50 - 110

Chrysene 667 510 ug/Kg 77 50 - 110








Fluorene 667 538 ug/Kg 81 46 - 110






Isophorone 667 495 ug/Kg 74 36 - 110







Phenol 667 510 ug/Kg 77 38 - 110

Pyrene 667 544 ug/Kg 82 49 - 110

TestAmerica Canton

Page 44 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Surrogate

85

LCS LCS










RL MDL


MB MB






0.020 U 0.000350.020 mg/L 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Pyridine








MB MB

Surrogate

03/28/14 11:03





68 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110

89 03/28/14 11:03 04/01/14 09:45 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110





Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits





Pyridine 0.0800 0.0616 mg/L 77 34 - 110





TestAmerica Canton

Page 45 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits



Surrogate

86

LCS LCS










RL MDL


MB MB






0.020 U 0.000350.020 mg/L 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Pyridine








MB MB

Surrogate

04/02/14 13:47





46 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110

92 04/02/14 13:47 04/03/14 14:14 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110





Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits





Pyridine 0.0800 0.0541 mg/L 68 34 - 110

TestAmerica Canton

Page 46 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits







Surrogate

95

LCS LCS







Client Sample ID: BW5 2-5Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-2 MS



1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0800 0.0691 mg/L 86 18 - 110

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U 0.0800 0.0791 mg/L 99 26 - 110

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.020 U 0.0800 0.0810 mg/L 101 16 - 110

2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.020 U 0.0800 0.0828 mg/L 104 26 - 110

2-Methylphenol 0.0040 U 0.0800 0.0678 mg/L 85 29 - 110

Pyridine 0.020 U 0.0800 0.0642 mg/L 80 15 - 110

3 & 4 Methylphenol 0.040 U 0.0800 0.0674 mg/L 84 27 - 110

Hexachlorobenzene 0.020 U 0.0800 0.0729 mg/L 91 34 - 110

Hexachlorobutadiene 0.020 U 0.0800 0.0746 mg/L 93 26 - 110

Hexachloroethane 0.020 U 0.0800 0.0690 mg/L 86 20 - 110

Nitrobenzene 0.0040 U 0.0800 0.0735 mg/L 92 33 - 110

Pentachlorophenol 0.040 U 0.160 0.150 mg/L 94 10 - 131


Surrogate

103

MS MS







TestAmerica Canton

Page 47 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

Aluminum 20 U 20 9.6 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1

MB MB


1.0 U 0.391.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Antimony

1.0 U 0.301.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Arsenic

20 U 0.1220 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Barium

0.50 U 0.0430.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Beryllium

0.20 U 0.0360.20 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Cadmium

500 U 29500 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Calcium

0.50 U 0.200.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Chromium

5.0 U 0.165.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Cobalt

2.5 U 0.742.5 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Copper

10 U 4.910 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Iron

0.30 U 0.190.30 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Lead

500 U 6.5500 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Magnesium

1.5 U 0.161.5 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Manganese

4.0 U 0.544.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Nickel

500 U 6.2500 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Potassium

0.50 U 0.450.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Selenium

0.50 U 0.100.50 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Silver

500 U 66500 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Sodium

1.0 U 0.551.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Thallium

5.0 U 0.215.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Vanadium

2.0 U 1.02.0 mg/Kg 03/24/14 13:34 03/25/14 13:55 1Zinc




Aluminum 200 191 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Antimony 50.0 42.8 mg/Kg 86 80 - 120

Arsenic 200 177 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120

Barium 200 184 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Beryllium 5.00 4.39 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120

Cadmium 5.00 4.43 mg/Kg 89 80 - 120

Calcium 5000 4400 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120

Chromium 20.0 18.2 mg/Kg 91 80 - 120

Cobalt 50.0 44.1 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120

Copper 25.0 22.7 mg/Kg 91 80 - 120

Iron 100 109 mg/Kg 109 80 - 120

Lead 50.0 43.6 mg/Kg 87 80 - 120

Magnesium 5000 4330 mg/Kg 87 80 - 120

Manganese 50.0 46.1 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Nickel 50.0 44.3 mg/Kg 89 80 - 120

Potassium 5000 4440 mg/Kg 89 80 - 120

Selenium 200 179 mg/Kg 89 80 - 120

Silver 5.00 4.74 mg/Kg 95 80 - 120

Sodium 5000 4480 mg/Kg 90 80 - 120

Thallium 200 180 mg/Kg 90 80 - 120

TestAmerica Canton

Page 48 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







Vanadium 50.0 43.9 mg/Kg 88 80 - 120

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Zinc 50.0 46.9 mg/Kg 94 80 - 120




Aluminum 4000 187 5280 4 mg/Kg 707 75 - 125☼

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

Antimony 0.69 J 46.7 26.3 F1 mg/Kg 55 75 - 125☼

Arsenic 11 187 190 mg/Kg 96 75 - 125☼

Barium 32 187 210 mg/Kg 95 75 - 125☼

Beryllium 0.27 J 4.67 4.30 mg/Kg 86 75 - 125☼

Cadmium 0.53 4.67 4.94 mg/Kg 94 75 - 125☼

Calcium 36000 4670 26400 4 mg/Kg -205 75 - 125☼

Chromium 19 18.7 34.2 mg/Kg 80 75 - 125☼

Cobalt 5.2 46.7 49.9 mg/Kg 96 75 - 125☼

Copper 40 23.4 68.7 mg/Kg 123 75 - 125☼

Iron 22000 93.5 23300 4 mg/Kg 1160 75 - 125☼

Lead 25 46.7 78.6 mg/Kg 114 75 - 125☼

Magnesium 11000 4670 12300 F1 mg/Kg 17 75 - 125☼

Manganese 370 46.7 365 4 mg/Kg -3 75 - 125☼

Nickel 44 46.7 84.4 mg/Kg 86 75 - 125☼

Potassium 730 4670 4950 mg/Kg 90 75 - 125☼

Selenium 0.47 U 187 173 mg/Kg 92 75 - 125☼

Silver 0.47 U 4.67 4.43 mg/Kg 95 75 - 125☼

Sodium 77 J 4670 4430 mg/Kg 93 75 - 125☼

Thallium 0.93 U 187 172 mg/Kg 92 75 - 125☼

Vanadium 14 46.7 55.4 mg/Kg 88 75 - 125☼

Zinc 71 46.7 125 mg/Kg 117 75 - 125☼

Client Sample ID: BW5 1-2Lab Sample ID: 240-35316-1 MSD



Aluminum 4000 187 5320 4 mg/Kg 729 75 - 125 1 20☼

Analyte

MSD MSD


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

Antimony 0.69 J 46.7 22.8 F1 mg/Kg 47 75 - 125 14 20☼

Arsenic 11 187 171 mg/Kg 86 75 - 125 11 20☼

Barium 32 187 194 mg/Kg 87 75 - 125 8 20☼

Beryllium 0.27 J 4.67 4.05 mg/Kg 81 75 - 125 6 20☼

Cadmium 0.53 4.67 4.50 mg/Kg 85 75 - 125 9 20☼

Calcium 36000 4670 36300 4 F2 mg/Kg 6 75 - 125 32 20☼

Chromium 19 18.7 30.7 F1 mg/Kg 61 75 - 125 11 20☼

Cobalt 5.2 46.7 48.2 mg/Kg 92 75 - 125 4 20☼

Copper 40 23.4 60.6 mg/Kg 88 75 - 125 13 20☼

Iron 22000 93.5 21700 4 mg/Kg -533 75 - 125 7 20☼

Lead 25 46.7 59.7 F1 F2 mg/Kg 73 75 - 125 27 20☼

Magnesium 11000 4670 16200 F2 mg/Kg 101 75 - 125 28 20☼

TestAmerica Canton

Page 49 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







Manganese 370 46.7 380 4 mg/Kg 29 75 - 125 4 20☼

Analyte

MSD MSD


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

Nickel 44 46.7 76.7 F1 mg/Kg 69 75 - 125 10 20☼

Potassium 730 4670 4870 mg/Kg 89 75 - 125 2 20☼

Selenium 0.47 U 187 160 mg/Kg 85 75 - 125 8 20☼

Silver 0.47 U 4.67 4.13 mg/Kg 88 75 - 125 7 20☼

Sodium 77 J 4670 4090 mg/Kg 86 75 - 125 8 20☼

Thallium 0.93 U 187 164 mg/Kg 88 75 - 125 4 20☼

Vanadium 14 46.7 53.9 mg/Kg 85 75 - 125 3 20☼

Zinc 71 46.7 121 mg/Kg 107 75 - 125 4 20☼




RL MDL

Arsenic 0.50 U 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1

MB MB


0.000947 J 0.0006710 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Barium

0.10 U 0.000660.10 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Cadmium

0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Chromium

0.50 U 0.00190.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Lead

0.25 U 0.00410.25 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Selenium

0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:21 1Silver




Arsenic 2.00 1.97 mg/L 98 50 - 150

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Barium 2.00 1.86 J mg/L 93 50 - 150

Cadmium 0.0500 0.0499 J mg/L 100 50 - 150

Chromium 0.200 0.183 J mg/L 91 50 - 150

Lead 0.500 0.423 J mg/L 85 50 - 150

Selenium 2.00 2.13 mg/L 106 50 - 150

Silver 0.0500 0.0517 J mg/L 103 50 - 150

Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124371/1-C



RL MDL

Arsenic 0.50 U 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1

LB LB


0.00176 J 0.0006710 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Barium

0.10 U 0.000660.10 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Cadmium

0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Chromium

0.50 U 0.00190.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Lead

0.25 U 0.00410.25 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Selenium

0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/28/14 10:27 03/31/14 08:17 1Silver

TestAmerica Canton

Page 50 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:12 1

MB MB





Mercury 0.00500 0.00472 mg/L 94 50 - 150

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits




RL MDL

Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/28/14 14:45 03/31/14 12:11 1

LB LB






RL MDL

Mercury 0.10 U 0.10 0.015 mg/Kg 03/24/14 16:00 03/25/14 15:07 1

MB MB





Mercury 0.833 0.855 mg/Kg 103 73 - 121

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits




Mercury 0.051 J 0.193 0.283 mg/Kg 120 11 - 192☼

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits




Mercury 0.051 J 0.193 0.278 mg/Kg 118 11 - 192 2 20☼

Analyte

MSD MSD


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

TestAmerica Canton

Page 51 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



GC/MS VOA

Prep Batch: 123823


Solid 5035240-35316-3 BW5 4-6 Total/NA

Solid 5035240-35316-6 BW6 1-2 Total/NA












Leach Batch: 124562


Solid 1311240-35316-3 BW5 4-6 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35316-8 BW6 6-8 TCLP




Solid 8260B 124562240-35316-3 BW5 4-6 TCLP

Solid 8260B 124562240-35316-8 BW6 6-8 TCLP



GC/MS Semi VOA

Prep Batch: 123851















TestAmerica Canton

Page 52 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




Leach Batch: 124371


Solid 1311240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35316-2 MS BW5 2-5 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 TCLP

Prep Batch: 124411


Solid 3520C 124371240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 TCLP

Solid 3520C 124371240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 TCLP








Solid 8270C 124411240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 TCLP

Solid 8270C 124411240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 TCLP



Prep Batch: 124983


Solid 3520C 124371240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 TCLP

Solid 3520C 124371240-35316-2 MS BW5 2-5 TCLP

Solid 3520C 124371240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 TCLP





Solid 8270C 124983240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 TCLP

Solid 8270C 124983240-35316-2 MS BW5 2-5 TCLP

Solid 8270C 124983240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 TCLP



Metals

Prep Batch: 123759



Solid 3050B240-35316-1 MS BW5 1-2 Total/NA

Solid 3050B240-35316-1 MSD BW5 1-2 Total/NA




TestAmerica Canton

Page 53 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Metals (Continued)





Prep Batch: 123765



Solid 7471A240-35316-1 MS BW5 1-2 Total/NA

Solid 7471A240-35316-1 MSD BW5 1-2 Total/NA









Solid 7471A 123765240-35316-1 MS BW5 1-2 Total/NA

Solid 7471A 123765240-35316-1 MSD BW5 1-2 Total/NA









Solid 6010B 123759240-35316-1 MS BW5 1-2 Total/NA

Solid 6010B 123759240-35316-1 MSD BW5 1-2 Total/NA











Leach Batch: 124371


Solid 1311240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 TCLP

Solid 1311LB 240-124371/1-C Method Blank TCLP


TestAmerica Canton

Page 54 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Metals (Continued)

Prep Batch: 124402


Solid 3010A 124371240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 TCLP

Solid 3010A 124371240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 TCLP

Solid 3010A 124371240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 TCLP

Solid 3010A 124371240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 TCLP

Solid 3010A 124371LB 240-124371/1-C Method Blank TCLP



Prep Batch: 124406


Solid 7470A 124371240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124371240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124371240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124371240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 TCLP






Solid 6010B 124402240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 TCLP

Solid 6010B 124402240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 TCLP

Solid 6010B 124402240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 TCLP

Solid 6010B 124402240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 TCLP

Solid 6010B 124402LB 240-124371/1-C Method Blank TCLP





Solid 7470A 124406240-35316-2 BW5 2-5 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124406240-35316-4 BW5 6-9 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124406240-35316-7 BW6 4-6 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124406240-35316-9 BW6 6-8 TCLP




General Chemistry







Solid Moisture240-35316-6 DU BW6 1-2 Total/NA


TestAmerica Canton

Page 55 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Prep 3540C 03/25/14 08:44 MPM123851 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA









Leach 1311 03/27/14 16:55 DRJ124371 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP











Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP


Prep 5035 123823 03/21/14 17:00 TJL2 TAL CANTotal/NA





Leach 1311 03/27/14 16:55 DRJ124371 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP




TestAmerica Canton

Page 56 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Prep 3010A 03/28/14 10:27 LPM124402 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP







Prep 3540C 03/25/14 08:44 MPM123851 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA









Prep 5035 03/21/14 17:00 TJL2123823 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA













Leach 1311 03/27/14 16:55 DRJ124371 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP


TestAmerica Canton

Page 57 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Analysis 8270C 04/03/14 17:10 JMG1 125096 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP
















Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP




Leach 1311 03/27/14 16:55 DRJ124371 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP











TestAmerica Canton

Page 58 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14










Kansas NELAP 7 E-10336 03-31-14 *


L-A-B DoD ELAP L2315 07-18-16

Minnesota NELAP 5 039-999-348 12-31-14



New York NELAP 2 10975 03-31-14 *




USDA Federal P330-13-00319 11-26-16





TestAmerica Canton


Page 59 of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

of 62 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Appendix G






Authorized for release by:4/4/2014 10:46:30 AM




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Table of Contents




4/4/2014

Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1



Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8






Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57


Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Qualifiers

GC/MS VOA


H Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time

Qualifier



GC/MS Semi VOA



Qualifier




Metals



Qualifier



Glossary



Abbreviation

%R Percent Recovery











NC Not Calculated



QC Quality Control






TestAmerica Canton

Page 3 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Job ID: 240-35338-1


Narrative

CASE NARRATIVE




















method header.


RECEIPT




Samples BW7 4-6 (240-35338-3) and BW8 2-4 (240-35338-6) were analyzed for TCLP volatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance

with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/8260B. The samples were leached on 03/30/2014 and analyzed on 03/31/2014.




EPA SW-846 Method 8260B. The samples were prepared on 03/24/2014 and analyzed on 03/26/2014.




The following samples were received with insufficient time remaining to freeze within 48 hours, as required for samples collected in water

preserved TerraCores: BW7 2-4 (240-35338-1), BW8 4-6 (240-35338-7). Samples were received on 3/24/14 and placed in the freezer at


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





13:45.



Samples BW7 4-6 (240-35338-2), BW7 6-8 (240-35338-4), BW8 0.5 -2 (240-35338-5) and BW8 2-4 (240-35338-6) were analyzed for

TCLP semivolatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/8270C. The samples were leached on

03/30/2014, prepared on 03/31/2014 and analyzed on 04/02/2014.



Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) failed the surrogate recovery criteria high for BW7 4-6 (240-35338-2) and BW8 2-4 (240-35338-6).

6 surrogates are used for this analysis. The laboratory's SOP allows 1 of these surrogates to be outside acceptance criteria without

performing re-extraction/re-analysis. The following sample(s) contained an allowable number of surrogate compounds outside limits:

BW7 4-6 (240-35338-2), BW8 2-4 (240-35338-6). These results have been reported and qualified.


with batch 124303.




semivolatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8270C. The samples were prepared on 03/25/2014,

03/26/2014 and 03/27/2014 and analyzed on 03/27/2014, 03/28/2014 and 03/30/2014.



Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, Diethyl phthalate and Di-n-butyl phthalate were detected in method blank MB 240-123875/23-A at levels that

were above the method detection limit but below the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged.

If the associated sample reported a result above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged.

Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and Di-n-butyl phthalate were detected in method blank MB 240-124042/19-A at levels that were above the

method detection limit but below the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged. If the

associated sample reported a result above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged.

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) failed the surrogate recovery criteria high for BW7 6-8 (240-35338-4). Refer to the QC report for details.

Samples BW7 2-4 (240-35338-1)[2X], BW7 6-8 (240-35338-4)[2X], BW8 4-6 (240-35338-7)[2X] and BW8 6-8 (240-35338-8)[2.5X] required

dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted accordingly.


TCLP METALS (ICP)


TCLP metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/6010B. The samples were leached on 03/30/2014, prepared on

03/31/2014 and analyzed on 04/01/2014.

Barium and Selenium were detected in method blank LB 240-124505/1-D at levels that were above the method detection limit but below




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Barium was detected in method blank MB 240-124584/2-A at a level that was above the method detection limit but below the reporting

limit. The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above the MDL

and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.


TOTAL METALS (ICP)


metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 6010B. The samples were prepared on 03/26/2014 and analyzed on 03/27/2014.





TCLP MERCURY


TCLP mercury in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/7470A. The samples were leached on 03/30/2014, prepared on 03/31/2014

and analyzed on 04/01/2014.


TOTAL MERCURY


mercury in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 7471A. The samples were prepared on 03/26/2014 and analyzed on 03/27/2014.


PERCENT SOLIDS

Samples BW7 2-4 (240-35338-1), BW7 6-8 (240-35338-4), BW8 4-6 (240-35338-7) and BW8 6-8 (240-35338-8) were analyzed for percent

solids in accordance with EPA Method 160.3 MOD. The samples were analyzed on 03/24/2014.



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14















TestAmerica Canton

Page 7 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




240-35338-1 BW7 2-4 Solid 03/21/14 08:15 03/24/14 09:45

240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 Solid 03/21/14 08:17 03/24/14 09:45

240-35338-3 BW7 4-6 Solid 03/21/14 08:19 03/24/14 09:45

240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 Solid 03/21/14 08:20 03/24/14 09:45

240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 Solid 03/21/14 09:00 03/24/14 09:45

240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 Solid 03/21/14 09:04 03/24/14 09:45

240-35338-7 BW8 4-6 Solid 03/21/14 09:07 03/24/14 09:45

240-35338-8 BW8 6-8 Solid 03/21/14 09:10 03/24/14 09:45

TestAmerica Canton

Page 8 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




☼2-Butanone (MEK)

RL

11 ug/Kg

MDL

0.80


Total/NA1J H0.85 8260B

☼1,1'-Biphenyl 110 ug/Kg7.9 Total/NA236 J 8270C




☼Acetophenone 230 ug/Kg21 Total/NA227 J 8270C








☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 160 ug/Kg43 Total/NA243 J 8270C









☼Phenol 110 ug/Kg17 Total/NA260 J 8270C
























Arsenic

RL

0.50 mg/L

MDL

0.0032


TCLP1J0.0044 6010B

TestAmerica Canton


Page 9 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




Barium

RL

10 mg/L

MDL

0.00067


TCLP1J B0.85 6010B



Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP12.2 6010B

Selenium 0.25 mg/L0.0041 TCLP10.0074 J B 6010B


No Detections.


☼1,1'-Biphenyl

RL

110 ug/Kg

MDL

7.8


Total/NA2J49 8270C















☼Dibenzofuran 110 ug/Kg1.5 Total/NA2140 8270C






















☼Potassium 510 mg/Kg6.3 Total/NA1490 J B 6010B

TestAmerica Canton


Page 10 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




☼Selenium

RL

0.51 mg/Kg

MDL

0.46


Total/NA10.85 6010B




Arsenic 0.50 mg/L0.0032 TCLP10.0057 J 6010B



Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.0047 J 6010B



Client Sample ID: BW8 0.5 -2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-5

Arsenic

RL

0.50 mg/L

MDL

0.0032


TCLP1J0.0033 6010B




Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.011 J 6010B



Arsenic

RL

0.50 mg/L

MDL

0.0032


TCLP1J0.0056 6010B




Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.075 J 6010B



☼1,1'-Biphenyl

RL

120 ug/Kg

MDL

8.3


Total/NA2J16 8270C











☼Carbazole 120 ug/Kg64 Total/NA2110 J 8270C





TestAmerica Canton


Page 11 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




☼Fluorene

RL

16 ug/Kg

MDL

1.3


Total/NA239 8270C




























☼1,1'-Biphenyl

RL

150 ug/Kg

MDL

10


Total/NA2.5J23 8270C



☼Acenaphthylene 20 ug/Kg1.0 Total/NA2.539 8270C







☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 210 ug/Kg56 Total/NA2.564 J B 8270C

☼Carbazole 150 ug/Kg80 Total/NA2.5120 J 8270C








TestAmerica Canton


Page 12 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




☼Phenanthrene

RL

20 ug/Kg

MDL

2.2


Total/NA2.5930 8270C
























TestAmerica Canton


Page 13 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.9 U H 2.9 0.32 ug/Kg ☼ 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1


2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.9 U H

2.9 0.74 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 2.9 U H

2.9 0.22 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2.9 U H

2.9 0.21 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,1-Dichloroethane 2.9 U H

2.9 0.30 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,1-Dichloroethene 2.9 U H

2.9 0.15 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2.9 U H

5.7 0.74 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 5.7 U H

2.9 0.21 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2.9 U H


2.9 0.39 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼1,2-Dichloropropane 2.9 U H



11 0.80 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 0.85 J H

11 0.36 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼2-Hexanone 11 U H

11 0.31 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 11 U H

11 3.6 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Acetone 11 U H

2.9 0.13 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Benzene 2.9 U H

2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Bromoform 2.9 U H

2.9 0.31 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Bromomethane 2.9 U H

2.9 0.25 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Carbon disulfide 2.9 U H

2.9 0.21 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Carbon tetrachloride 2.9 U H

2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Chlorobenzene 2.9 U H

2.9 0.31 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Chlorodibromomethane 2.9 U H

2.9 0.49 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Chloroethane 2.9 U H

2.9 0.17 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Chloroform 2.9 U H

2.9 0.23 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Chloromethane 2.9 U H

2.9 0.21 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.9 U H

2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.9 U H

5.7 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Cyclohexane 5.7 U H

2.9 0.16 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Dichlorobromomethane 2.9 U H

2.9 0.29 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.9 U H

2.9 0.15 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Ethylbenzene 2.9 U H

2.9 0.29 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Ethylene Dibromide 2.9 U H

2.9 0.091 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Isopropylbenzene 2.9 U H

5.7 0.80 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Methyl acetate 5.7 U H

2.9 0.25 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.9 U H

5.7 0.18 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Methylcyclohexane 5.7 U H

2.9 0.38 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Methylene Chloride 2.9 U H

2.9 0.086 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Styrene 2.9 U H

2.9 0.30 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Tetrachloroethene 2.9 U H

2.9 0.15 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Toluene 2.9 U H

2.9 0.23 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.9 U H

2.9 0.31 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.9 U H

2.9 0.24 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Trichloroethene 2.9 U H

2.9 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Trichlorofluoromethane 2.9 U H

2.9 0.22 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Vinyl chloride 2.9 U H

5.7 0.20 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 1☼Xylenes, Total 5.7 U H

TestAmerica Canton

Page 14 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14









Toluene-d8 (Surr) 93 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 22:40 167 - 125


1,1'-Biphenyl 36 J 110 7.9 ug/Kg ☼ 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2



























230 21 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Acetophenone 27 J

15 1.8 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Anthracene 90

450 21 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Atrazine 450 U










160 43 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 43 J



110 61 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Carbazole 110 U

15 2.5 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Chrysene 990

TestAmerica Canton

Page 15 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14














15 1.2 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Fluorene 80













110 17 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Phenol 60 J

15 1.0 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 2☼Pyrene 870






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 77 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 226 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 96 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 14:18 236 - 110


Aluminum 5700 18 8.7 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1


0.91 0.35 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Antimony 0.39 J

0.91 0.27 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Arsenic 7.1

18 0.11 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Barium 57 B

0.45 0.039 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Beryllium 0.26 J

0.18 0.033 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Cadmium 0.41

450 26 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Calcium 5800

0.45 0.18 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Chromium 26

4.5 0.15 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Cobalt 3.4 J

2.3 0.67 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Copper 96

9.1 4.5 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Iron 22000

0.27 0.17 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Lead 44

450 5.9 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Magnesium 1600

1.4 0.15 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Manganese 450

3.6 0.49 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Nickel 34

450 5.6 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Potassium 530 B

0.45 0.41 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Selenium 0.62

TestAmerica Canton

Page 16 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Silver 0.45 U 0.45 0.091 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1


450 60 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Sodium 810

0.91 0.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Thallium 0.91 U

4.5 0.19 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Vanadium 10

1.8 0.91 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:15 1☼Zinc 100


Mercury 0.069 J 0.11 0.017 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 09:30 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 17 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14


















0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 1Pyridine 0.020 U






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 85 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 18:36 120 - 110



Arsenic 0.0044 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:37 1


10 0.00067 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:37 1Barium 0.85 J B

0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:37 1Cadmium 0.014 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:37 1Chromium 0.0092 J

0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:37 1Lead 2.2

0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:37 1Selenium 0.0074 J B

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:37 1Silver 0.50 U


Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 09:17 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 18 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14










0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 21:13 1Benzene 0.025 U



0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 21:13 1Chloroform 0.025 U








Toluene-d8 (Surr) 101 03/31/14 21:13 180 - 120

TestAmerica Canton

Page 19 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






1,1'-Biphenyl 49 J 110 7.8 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2




























15 1.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Anthracene 110

450 20 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Atrazine 450 U













110 60 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Carbazole 110 U

15 2.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Chrysene 790


110 1.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Dibenzofuran 140





TestAmerica Canton

Page 20 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








15 1.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Fluorene 56













110 16 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Phenol 110 U

15 0.98 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 2☼Pyrene 810






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 88 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:34 226 - 110















0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 1Pyridine 0.020 U






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 72 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 120 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 104 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:01 138 - 110

TestAmerica Canton

Page 21 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Aluminum 4500 20 9.7 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1


1.0 0.40 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Antimony 0.41 J

1.0 0.30 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Arsenic 9.2

20 0.12 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Barium 44 B

0.51 0.044 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Beryllium 0.37 J

0.20 0.036 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Cadmium 0.33

510 29 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Calcium 9100

0.51 0.20 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Chromium 22

5.1 0.16 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Cobalt 4.1 J

2.5 0.75 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Copper 74

10 5.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Iron 28000

0.30 0.19 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Lead 55

510 6.6 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Magnesium 3000

1.5 0.16 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Manganese 380

4.1 0.55 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Nickel 37

510 6.3 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Potassium 490 J B

0.51 0.46 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Selenium 0.85

0.51 0.10 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Silver 0.51 U

510 67 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Sodium 610

1.0 0.56 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Thallium 1.0 U

5.1 0.21 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Vanadium 10

2.0 1.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:19 1☼Zinc 66


Arsenic 0.0057 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:41 1


10 0.00067 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:41 1Barium 0.38 J B

0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:41 1Cadmium 0.0018 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:41 1Chromium 0.50 U

0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:41 1Lead 0.0047 J

0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:41 1Selenium 0.0049 J B

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:41 1Silver 0.50 U


Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 09:19 1



Mercury 0.15 0.11 0.017 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 09:37 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 22 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-5Client Sample ID: BW8 0.5 -2Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:00















0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 1Pyridine 0.020 U






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 69 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 120 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 105 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:27 138 - 110


Arsenic 0.0033 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:45 1


10 0.00067 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:45 1Barium 0.66 J B

0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:45 1Cadmium 0.024 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:45 1Chromium 0.0040 J

0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:45 1Lead 0.011 J

0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:45 1Selenium 0.0084 J B

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:45 1Silver 0.50 U


Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 09:23 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 23 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14










0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 21:36 1Benzene 0.025 U



0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 21:36 1Chloroform 0.025 U








Toluene-d8 (Surr) 98 03/31/14 21:36 180 - 120














0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 1Pyridine 0.020 U






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 73 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 19:52 120 - 110



Arsenic 0.0056 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:50 1


10 0.00067 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:50 1Barium 0.98 J B

0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:50 1Cadmium 0.015 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:50 1Chromium 0.0075 J

0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:50 1Lead 0.075 J

0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:50 1Selenium 0.0045 J B

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:50 1Silver 0.50 U

TestAmerica Canton

Page 24 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 09:25 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 25 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




















14 0.97 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 14 U H

14 0.44 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼2-Hexanone 14 U H


14 4.4 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Acetone 14 U H

3.5 0.16 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Benzene 3.5 U H






















3.5 0.10 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Styrene 3.5 U H

3.5 0.36 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Tetrachloroethene 3.5 U H

3.5 0.19 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼Toluene 3.5 U H

3.5 0.28 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.5 U H






TestAmerica Canton

Page 26 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14









Toluene-d8 (Surr) 87 03/24/14 13:45 03/26/14 23:01 167 - 125


1,1'-Biphenyl 16 J 120 8.3 ug/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2




























16 1.8 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Anthracene 120

470 22 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Atrazine 470 U













120 64 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Carbazole 110 J

16 2.6 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Chrysene 1100

TestAmerica Canton

Page 27 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14














16 1.3 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Fluorene 39













120 17 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Phenol 120 U

16 1.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 2☼Pyrene 1500






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 73 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 226 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 82 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 17:44 236 - 110


Aluminum 5600 23 11 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1


1.2 0.45 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Antimony 5.9

1.2 0.35 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Arsenic 460

23 0.14 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Barium 170 B

0.58 0.050 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Beryllium 0.43 J

0.23 0.042 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Cadmium 4.1

580 34 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Calcium 12000

0.58 0.23 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Chromium 23

5.8 0.19 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Cobalt 8.1

2.9 0.86 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Copper 56

12 5.7 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Iron 31000

0.35 0.22 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Lead 260

580 7.5 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Magnesium 3500

1.7 0.19 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Manganese 440

4.6 0.63 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Nickel 26

580 7.2 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Potassium 810 B

0.58 0.52 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Selenium 9.4

TestAmerica Canton

Page 28 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Silver 0.63 0.58 0.12 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1


580 77 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Sodium 110 J

1.2 0.64 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Thallium 1.2 U

5.8 0.24 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Vanadium 18

2.3 1.2 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:23 1☼Zinc 500


Mercury 0.60 0.12 0.017 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 09:40 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 29 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






1,1'-Biphenyl 23 J 150 10 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5


























20 1.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Acenaphthylene 39

300 27 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Acetophenone 300 U

20 2.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Anthracene 180

590 27 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Atrazine 590 U

300 36 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Benzaldehyde 300 U









210 56 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 64 J B



150 80 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Carbazole 120 J

20 3.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Chrysene 1300

20 2.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 170






TestAmerica Canton

Page 30 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Fluoranthene 1800 20 1.6 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5


20 1.6 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Fluorene 57













150 22 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Phenol 150 U

20 1.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.5☼Pyrene 1800






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 61 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.526 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 81 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:56 2.536 - 110


Aluminum 5300 17 8.4 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1


0.87 0.34 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Antimony 1.2

0.87 0.26 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Arsenic 23

17 0.10 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Barium 160 B

0.44 0.038 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Beryllium 0.39 J

0.17 0.031 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Cadmium 3.3

440 25 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Calcium 7900

0.44 0.17 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Chromium 20

4.4 0.14 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Cobalt 6.8

2.2 0.65 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Copper 41

8.7 4.3 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Iron 22000

0.26 0.17 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Lead 230

440 5.7 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Magnesium 2700

1.3 0.14 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Manganese 380

3.5 0.47 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Nickel 28

440 5.4 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Potassium 740 B

0.44 0.39 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Selenium 4.6

0.44 0.087 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Silver 0.66

440 58 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Sodium 81 J

0.87 0.48 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Thallium 0.87 U

4.4 0.18 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Vanadium 13

1.7 0.87 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:27 1☼Zinc 300

TestAmerica Canton

Page 31 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Mercury 0.54 0.13 0.020 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 09:42 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 32 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





12DCE BFB DBFM TOL

104 94 86 93240-35338-1


BW7 2-4

103 82 87 87240-35338-7 BW8 4-6


96 81 91 90MB 240-124052/6 Method Blank

Surrogate Legend







12DCE BFB DBFM TOL

84 90 91 100LCS 240-124658/4


Lab Control Sample

Surrogate Legend







12DCE BFB DBFM TOL

90 89 90 101240-35338-3


BW7 4-6

90 89 83 98240-35338-6 BW8 2-4


Surrogate Legend








80 79 70 71 77 96240-35338-1


BW7 2-4

83 83 82 8876 111 X240-35338-4 BW7 6-8

56 74 69 7370 82240-35338-7 BW8 4-6

TestAmerica Canton

Page 33 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






59 61 61 59 61 81240-35338-8


BW8 6-8




55 79 79 8077 108MB 240-123875/23-A Method Blank

87 87 83 8588 92MB 240-124042/19-A Method Blank

65 80 74 7683 88MB 240-124303/2-A Method Blank

Surrogate Legend










95 78 31 72 67 100LCS 240-124527/14-A


Lab Control Sample

80 71 52 6668 98MB 240-124527/13-A Method Blank

Surrogate Legend










107 87 69 84 85 113 X240-35338-2


BW7 4-6

100 83 24 7282 104240-35338-4 BW7 6-8

97 75 27 6973 105240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2

82 83 36 7379 112 X240-35338-6 BW8 2-4

Surrogate Legend






TestAmerica Canton

Page 34 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




TestAmerica Canton

Page 35 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL


MB MB















20 U 0.6320 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 12-Hexanone


20 U 6.320 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Acetone

5.0 U 0.235.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Benzene

5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Bromoform




















5.0 U 0.675.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Methylene Chloride

5.0 U 0.155.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Styrene


5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/26/14 13:00 1Toluene







TestAmerica Canton

Page 36 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








MB MB




90 03/26/14 13:00 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125





Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits



ne

50.0 51.7 ug/Kg 103 80 - 138












2-Hexanone 100 89.1 ug/Kg 89 64 - 136


Acetone 100 98.3 ug/Kg 98 41 - 137

Benzene 50.0 50.4 ug/Kg 101 79 - 120

Bromoform 50.0 48.6 ug/Kg 97 62 - 133






Chloroform 50.0 52.4 ug/Kg 105 77 - 120













TestAmerica Canton

Page 37 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits


o-Xylene 50.0 52.7 ug/Kg 105 80 - 120

Styrene 50.0 49.3 ug/Kg 99 80 - 120


Toluene 50.0 48.7 ug/Kg 97 75 - 120








Surrogate

91

LCS LCS









Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits


2-Butanone (MEK) 2.00 1.93 mg/L 96 49 - 120

Benzene 1.00 0.969 mg/L 97 80 - 120



Chloroform 1.00 0.908 mg/L 91 80 - 123





Surrogate

84

LCS LCS








RL MDL


MB MB



TestAmerica Canton

Page 38 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

2-Butanone (MEK) 0.25 U 0.25 0.029 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1

MB MB


0.025 U 0.00650.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Benzene



0.025 U 0.00800.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Chloroform





MB MB




97 03/31/14 16:13 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 80 - 120





RL MDL

1,1'-Biphenyl 50 U 50 3.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1

MB MB



























TestAmerica Canton

Page 39 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

Acetophenone 100 U 100 9.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1

MB MB



200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Atrazine













50 U 2750 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Carbazole

6.7 U 1.16.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Chrysene



16.5 J 1670 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Diethyl phthalate





6.7 U 0.536.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Fluorene













50 U 7.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Phenol

6.7 U 0.446.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Pyrene


MB MB

Surrogate

03/25/14 09:59





80 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110

108 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110

TestAmerica Canton

Page 40 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







1,1'-Biphenyl 667 518 ug/Kg 78 35 - 110

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits



























Anthracene 667 571 ug/Kg 86 48 - 110

Atrazine 1330 1300 ug/Kg 97 66 - 127













Carbazole 667 563 ug/Kg 84 50 - 110

Chrysene 667 553 ug/Kg 83 50 - 110






TestAmerica Canton

Page 41 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits


Fluorene 667 552 ug/Kg 83 46 - 110



Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 667 315 J ug/Kg 47 12 - 110



Isophorone 667 511 ug/Kg 77 36 - 110







Phenol 667 545 ug/Kg 82 38 - 110

Pyrene 667 585 ug/Kg 88 49 - 110


Surrogate

82

LCS LCS










RL MDL

1,1'-Biphenyl 50 U 50 3.5 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1

MB MB


















TestAmerica Canton

Page 42 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 150 U 150 9.2 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1

MB MB












200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Atrazine













50 U 2750 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Carbazole

6.7 U 1.16.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Chrysene








6.7 U 0.536.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Fluorene













50 U 7.350 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Phenol

6.7 U 0.446.7 ug/Kg 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Pyrene

TestAmerica Canton

Page 43 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








MB MB

Surrogate

03/26/14 10:35





85 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110

92 03/26/14 10:35 03/28/14 08:35 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110




1,1'-Biphenyl 667 507 ug/Kg 76 35 - 110

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits



























Anthracene 667 469 ug/Kg 70 48 - 110

Atrazine 1330 1100 ug/Kg 82 66 - 127








TestAmerica Canton

Page 44 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits





Carbazole 667 485 ug/Kg 73 50 - 110

Chrysene 667 477 ug/Kg 72 50 - 110








Fluorene 667 507 ug/Kg 76 46 - 110






Isophorone 667 562 ug/Kg 84 36 - 110







Phenol 667 542 ug/Kg 81 38 - 110

Pyrene 667 494 ug/Kg 74 49 - 110


Surrogate

79

LCS LCS










RL MDL

1,1'-Biphenyl 50 U 50 3.5 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1

MB MB






TestAmerica Canton

Page 45 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

2,4-Dinitrophenol 330 U 330 21 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1

MB MB
























200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Atrazine










70 U 1970 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate



50 U 2750 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Carbazole

6.7 U 1.16.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Chrysene








6.7 U 0.536.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Fluorene



TestAmerica Canton

Page 46 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 330 U 330 8.1 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1

MB MB











50 U 7.350 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Phenol

6.7 U 0.446.7 ug/Kg 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Pyrene


MB MB

Surrogate

03/27/14 15:55





76 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110

88 03/27/14 15:55 03/30/14 11:32 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110




1,1'-Biphenyl 667 575 ug/Kg 86 35 - 110

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits






















TestAmerica Canton

Page 47 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits





Anthracene 667 512 ug/Kg 77 48 - 110

Atrazine 1330 1200 ug/Kg 90 66 - 127













Carbazole 667 535 ug/Kg 80 50 - 110

Chrysene 667 531 ug/Kg 80 50 - 110








Fluorene 667 568 ug/Kg 85 46 - 110






Isophorone 667 615 ug/Kg 92 36 - 110







Phenol 667 607 ug/Kg 91 38 - 110

Pyrene 667 556 ug/Kg 83 49 - 110


Surrogate

87

LCS LCS




TestAmerica Canton

Page 48 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







Nitrobenzene-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110

Surrogate

93

LCS LCS







RL MDL


MB MB






0.020 U 0.000350.020 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Pyridine








MB MB

Surrogate

03/31/14 07:11





66 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110

98 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110





Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits





Pyridine 0.0800 0.0557 mg/L 70 34 - 110







TestAmerica Canton

Page 49 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Surrogate

95

LCS LCS











RL MDL

Aluminum 20 U 20 9.6 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1

MB MB


1.0 U 0.391.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Antimony

1.0 U 0.301.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Arsenic

0.170 J 0.1220 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Barium

0.50 U 0.0430.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Beryllium

0.20 U 0.0360.20 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Cadmium

500 U 29500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Calcium

0.50 U 0.200.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Chromium

5.0 U 0.165.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Cobalt

2.5 U 0.742.5 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Copper

10 U 4.910 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Iron

0.30 U 0.190.30 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Lead

500 U 6.5500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Magnesium

1.5 U 0.161.5 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Manganese

4.0 U 0.544.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Nickel

12.8 J 6.2500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Potassium

0.50 U 0.450.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Selenium

0.50 U 0.100.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Silver

500 U 66500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Sodium

1.0 U 0.551.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Thallium

5.0 U 0.215.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Vanadium

2.0 U 1.02.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Zinc




Aluminum 200 191 mg/Kg 95 80 - 120

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Antimony 50.0 46.7 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Arsenic 200 188 mg/Kg 94 80 - 120

Barium 200 192 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120

Beryllium 5.00 4.52 mg/Kg 90 80 - 120

Cadmium 5.00 4.76 mg/Kg 95 80 - 120

TestAmerica Canton

Page 50 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







Calcium 5000 4660 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Chromium 20.0 19.3 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120

Cobalt 50.0 46.0 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Copper 25.0 23.3 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Iron 100 106 mg/Kg 106 80 - 120

Lead 50.0 46.2 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Magnesium 5000 4600 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Manganese 50.0 48.0 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120

Nickel 50.0 46.2 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Potassium 5000 4650 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Selenium 200 183 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Silver 5.00 4.92 mg/Kg 98 80 - 120

Sodium 5000 4670 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Thallium 200 185 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Vanadium 50.0 46.7 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Zinc 50.0 46.1 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120




RL MDL

Arsenic 0.50 U 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1

MB MB


0.00102 J 0.0006710 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Barium

0.10 U 0.000660.10 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Cadmium

0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Chromium

0.50 U 0.00190.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Lead

0.25 U 0.00410.25 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Selenium

0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Silver




Arsenic 2.00 2.02 mg/L 101 50 - 150

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Barium 2.00 1.85 J mg/L 93 50 - 150

Cadmium 0.0500 0.0499 J mg/L 100 50 - 150

Chromium 0.200 0.193 J mg/L 96 50 - 150

Lead 0.500 0.447 J mg/L 89 50 - 150

Selenium 2.00 2.09 mg/L 105 50 - 150

Silver 0.0500 0.0529 J mg/L 106 50 - 150




RL MDL

Arsenic 0.50 U 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1

LB LB


TestAmerica Canton

Page 51 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

Barium 0.00218 J 10 0.00067 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1

LB LB


0.10 U 0.000660.10 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Cadmium

0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Chromium

0.50 U 0.00190.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Lead

0.00562 J 0.00410.25 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Selenium

0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Silver





RL MDL

Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 08:58 1

MB MB





Mercury 0.00500 0.00485 mg/L 97 50 - 150

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124505/1-E



RL MDL

Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 08:56 1

LB LB






RL MDL

Mercury 0.10 U 0.10 0.015 mg/Kg 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 08:54 1

MB MB





Mercury 0.833 0.856 mg/Kg 103 73 - 121

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

TestAmerica Canton

Page 52 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



GC/MS VOA

Prep Batch: 123823


Solid 5035240-35338-1 BW7 2-4 Total/NA

Solid 5035240-35338-7 BW8 4-6 Total/NA







Leach Batch: 124562


Solid 1311240-35338-3 BW7 4-6 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP




Solid 8260B 124562240-35338-3 BW7 4-6 TCLP

Solid 8260B 124562240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP



GC/MS Semi VOA

Prep Batch: 123875






Prep Batch: 124042











Prep Batch: 124303





TestAmerica Canton

Page 53 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14














Leach Batch: 124505


Solid 1311240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP

Prep Batch: 124527


Solid 3520C 124505240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 TCLP

Solid 3520C 124505240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 TCLP

Solid 3520C 124505240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 TCLP

Solid 3520C 124505240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP





Solid 8270C 124527240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 TCLP

Solid 8270C 124527240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 TCLP

Solid 8270C 124527240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 TCLP

Solid 8270C 124527240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP





Metals

Prep Batch: 124048








TestAmerica Canton

Page 54 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Metals (Continued)

Prep Batch: 124076
























Leach Batch: 124505


Solid 1311240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP


Solid 1311LB 240-124505/1-E Method Blank TCLP

Prep Batch: 124584


Solid 3010A 124505240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 TCLP

Solid 3010A 124505240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 TCLP

Solid 3010A 124505240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 TCLP

Solid 3010A 124505240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP




Prep Batch: 124593


Solid 7470A 124505240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124505240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124505240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124505240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124505LB 240-124505/1-E Method Blank TCLP

TestAmerica Canton

Page 55 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Metals (Continued)







Solid 6010B 124584240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 TCLP

Solid 6010B 124584240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 TCLP

Solid 6010B 124584240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 TCLP

Solid 6010B 124584240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP

Solid 6010B 124584LB 240-124505/1-D Method Blank TCLP





Solid 7470A 124593240-35338-2 BW7 4-6 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124593240-35338-4 BW7 6-8 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124593240-35338-5 BW8 0.5 -2 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124593240-35338-6 BW8 2-4 TCLP




General Chemistry








TestAmerica Canton

Page 56 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Prep 5035 03/24/14 13:45 TJL2123823 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA


Prep 3540C 124303 03/27/14 15:55 KEC TAL CANTotal/NA






Analysis Moisture 1 123764 03/24/14 15:29 NJE TAL CANTotal/NA



Leach 1311 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ124505 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP




Prep 3010A 124584 03/31/14 09:48 DEE TAL CANTCLP







Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP




Leach 1311 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ124505 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP





TestAmerica Canton

Page 57 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Leach 1311 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ124505 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP











Client Sample ID: BW8 0.5 -2 Lab Sample ID: 240-35338-5Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/21/14 09:00


Leach 1311 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ124505 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP











Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP











TestAmerica Canton

Page 58 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Prep 5035 03/24/14 13:45 TJL2123823 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA











Prep 3540C 03/25/14 09:59 MPM123875 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA









TestAmerica Canton

Page 59 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14










Kansas NELAP 7 E-10336 03-31-14 *


L-A-B DoD ELAP L2315 07-18-16

Minnesota NELAP 5 039-999-348 12-31-14



New York NELAP 2 10975 03-31-14 *




USDA Federal P330-13-00319 11-26-16





TestAmerica Canton


Page 60 of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

of 63 4/4/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Appendix H






Authorized for release by:4/9/2014 10:23:17 AM




1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Table of Contents




4/9/2014

Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1



Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8






Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45


Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Qualifiers

GC/MS VOA


H Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time

Qualifier



GC/MS Semi VOA



Qualifier



GC VOA



Qualifier

GC Semi VOA



Qualifier

Metals



Qualifier



Glossary



Abbreviation

%R Percent Recovery











NC Not Calculated



QC Quality Control






TestAmerica Canton

Page 3 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Job ID: 240-35339-1


Narrative

CASE NARRATIVE




















method header.


RECEIPT



Except:

Method(s) 5035, 8260B: The following sample(s) was received with insufficient time remaining to freeze within 48 hours, as required for

samples collected in water preserved TerraCores: BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5), BW9 0-2 (240-35339-1). Sample 1 was sampled on 3/21/14

at 9:45am and received 3/24/14 and placed in the freezer at 13:45 sample 5 was sampled on 3/21/14 at 10:35am and received on 3/24/14

and placed in the freezer at 13:45.


Samples BW9 0-2 (240-35339-1) and BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5) were analyzed for TCLP volatile organic compounds (GCMS) in

accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/8260B. The samples were leached on 03/30/2014 and analyzed on 03/31/2014.

Method(s) 8260B: The following samples were received outside of holding time: BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5), BW9 0-2 (240-35339-1).

No other difficulties were encountered during the VOCs analysis.


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





All other quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.



EPA SW-846 Method 8260B. The samples were prepared on 03/24/2014 and analyzed on 03/27/2014.



The following samples were received outside of holding time: BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5), BW9 0-2 (240-35339-1).


with batch 124125.



Samples BW9 4-8 (240-35339-3), BW10 0-2 (240-35339-4) and BW10 4-6 (240-35339-6) were analyzed for TCLP semivolatile organic

compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/8270C. The samples were leached on 03/30/2014, prepared on

03/31/2014 and 04/04/2014 and analyzed on 04/02/2014 and 04/08/2014.



Method(s) 3520C: Insufficient sample volume was available to perform a matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate/sample duplicate

(MS/MSD/DUP) associated with batch 125270.



Samples BW9 2-4 (240-35339-2) and BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5) were analyzed for semivolatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance

with EPA SW-846 Method 8270C. The samples were prepared on 03/25/2014 and analyzed on 03/27/2014.



Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, Diethyl phthalate and Di-n-butyl phthalate were detected in method blank MB 240-123875/23-A at levels that

were above the method detection limit but below the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged.

If the associated sample reported a result above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.

Sample BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5)[4X] required dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted accordingly.


GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS

Sample BW10 6-8 (240-35339-7) was analyzed for gasoline range organics in accordance with SW846 Method 8015C. The samples

were prepared and analyzed on 03/26/2014.

No difficulties were encountered during the GrOain size analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.

DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS (DRO)

Sample BW10 6-8 (240-35339-7) was analyzed for diesel range organics (DRO) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8015C - DRO.



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





No difficulties were encountered during the DRO analysis. All quality control parameters were within the acceptance limits.

TCLP METALS (ICP)

Samples BW9 4-8 (240-35339-3), BW10 0-2 (240-35339-4) and BW10 4-6 (240-35339-6) were analyzed for TCLP metals (ICP) in

accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/6010B. The samples were leached on 03/30/2014, prepared on 03/31/2014 and analyzed on

04/01/2014.

Barium and Selenium were detected in method blank LB 240-124505/1-D at levels that were above the method detection limit but below



Barium was detected in method blank MB 240-124584/2-A at a level that was above the method detection limit but below the reporting

limit. The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above the MDL

and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.


TOTAL METALS (ICP)

Samples BW9 2-4 (240-35339-2) and BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5) were analyzed for total metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA SW-846

Method 6010B. The samples were prepared on 03/26/2014 and analyzed on 03/27/2014.





TCLP MERCURY

Samples BW9 4-8 (240-35339-3), BW10 0-2 (240-35339-4) and BW10 4-6 (240-35339-6) were analyzed for TCLP mercury in accordance

with EPA SW-846 Methods 1311/7470A. The samples were leached on 03/30/2014, prepared on 03/31/2014 and analyzed on 04/01/2014.


TOTAL MERCURY

Samples BW9 2-4 (240-35339-2) and BW10 2-4 (240-35339-5) were analyzed for total mercury in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method

7471A. The samples were prepared on 03/26/2014 and analyzed on 03/27/2014.


PERCENT SOLIDS


percent solids in accordance with EPA Method 160.3 MOD. The samples were analyzed on 03/24/2014.



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






SW8468015C Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Gasoline Range Organics) TAL CAN

SW8468015C Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Diesel Range Organics) TAL CAN










TestAmerica Canton

Page 7 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




240-35339-1 BW9 0-2 Solid 03/21/14 09:45 03/24/14 09:45

240-35339-2 BW9 2-4 Solid 03/21/14 09:50 03/24/14 09:45

240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 Solid 03/21/14 09:52 03/24/14 09:45

240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 Solid 03/21/14 10:30 03/24/14 09:45

240-35339-5 BW10 2-4 Solid 03/21/14 10:35 03/24/14 09:45

240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 Solid 03/21/14 10:37 03/24/14 09:45

240-35339-7 BW10 6-8 Solid 03/21/14 10:40 03/24/14 09:45

TestAmerica Canton

Page 8 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




No Detections.


☼1,1'-Biphenyl

RL

57 ug/Kg

MDL

4.0


Total/NA1J13 8270C



☼Acenaphthylene 7.6 ug/Kg0.40 Total/NA113 8270C













☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 79 ug/Kg17 Total/NA135 J B 8270C


☼Fluorene 7.6 ug/Kg0.60 Total/NA117 8270C




☼Phenol 57 ug/Kg8.3 Total/NA116 J 8270C
























TestAmerica Canton


Page 9 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




Arsenic

RL

0.50 mg/L

MDL

0.0032


TCLP1J0.0043 6010B




Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.15 J 6010B


Arsenic

RL

0.50 mg/L

MDL

0.0032


TCLP1J0.0043 6010B






☼1,1'-Biphenyl

RL

220 ug/Kg

MDL

16


Total/NA4J25 8270C




















☼Barium 16 mg/Kg0.098 Total/NA111 J B 6010B


☼Cadmium 0.16 mg/Kg0.029 Total/NA10.062 J 6010B


☼Chromium 0.41 mg/Kg0.16 Total/NA18.6 6010B


☼Copper 2.0 mg/Kg0.61 Total/NA18.7 6010B


☼Lead 0.25 mg/Kg0.16 Total/NA15.9 6010B




TestAmerica Canton


Page 10 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




☼Potassium

RL

410 mg/Kg

MDL

5.1


Total/NA1J B150 6010B


☼Vanadium 4.1 mg/Kg0.17 Total/NA14.6 6010B




Arsenic

RL

0.50 mg/L

MDL

0.0032


TCLP1J0.0046 6010B




Lead 0.50 mg/L0.0019 TCLP10.0064 J 6010B



☼Diesel Range Organics [C10 - C28]

RL

18 mg/Kg

MDL

10


Total/NA168 8015C

TestAmerica Canton


Page 11 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





















11 0.35 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼2-Hexanone 11 U H


11 3.5 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Acetone 11 U H

2.8 0.13 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Benzene 2.8 U H






















2.8 0.083 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Styrene 2.8 U H

2.8 0.29 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Tetrachloroethene 2.8 U H *

2.8 0.15 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼Toluene 2.8 U H

2.8 0.23 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.8 U H *






TestAmerica Canton

Page 12 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14









Toluene-d8 (Surr) 96 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:03 167 - 125






0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 21:59 1Benzene 0.025 U



0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 21:59 1Chloroform 0.025 U








Toluene-d8 (Surr) 97 03/31/14 21:59 180 - 120

TestAmerica Canton

Page 13 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






1,1'-Biphenyl 13 J 57 4.0 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1


























7.6 0.40 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Acenaphthylene 13


7.6 0.89 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Anthracene 47

230 10 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Atrazine 230 U













57 31 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Carbazole 57 U

7.6 1.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Chrysene 480





79 17 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Di-n-butyl phthalate 35 J B


TestAmerica Canton

Page 14 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








7.6 0.60 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Fluorene 17













57 8.3 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Phenol 16 J

7.6 0.50 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 1☼Pyrene 470






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 69 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 126 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 85 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 19:12 136 - 110


Aluminum 6100 19 9.1 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1


0.95 0.37 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Antimony 0.58 J

0.95 0.28 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Arsenic 12

19 0.11 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Barium 120 B

0.47 0.041 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Beryllium 0.62

0.19 0.034 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Cadmium 1.3

470 27 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Calcium 10000

0.47 0.19 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Chromium 15

4.7 0.15 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Cobalt 6.8

2.4 0.70 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Copper 31

9.5 4.6 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Iron 20000

0.28 0.18 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Lead 150

470 6.2 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Magnesium 3200

1.4 0.15 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Manganese 560

3.8 0.51 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Nickel 43

470 5.9 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Potassium 790 B

0.47 0.43 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Selenium 0.73

0.47 0.095 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Silver 0.17 J

470 62 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Sodium 210 J

0.95 0.52 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Thallium 0.95 U

4.7 0.20 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Vanadium 16

1.9 0.95 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:35 1☼Zinc 150

TestAmerica Canton

Page 15 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Mercury 0.25 0.13 0.019 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 09:47 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 16 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14


















0.020 0.00035 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 1Pyridine 0.020 U






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 46 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 120 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 72 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:57 138 - 110


Arsenic 0.0043 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:54 1


10 0.00067 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:54 1Barium 0.63 J B

0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:54 1Cadmium 0.0047 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:54 1Chromium 0.0053 J

0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:54 1Lead 0.15 J

0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:54 1Selenium 0.25 U

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:54 1Silver 0.50 U


Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 09:26 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 17 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14


















0.020 0.00035 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 1Pyridine 0.020 U






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 64 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 120 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 97 03/31/14 07:11 04/02/14 20:43 138 - 110


Arsenic 0.0043 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:58 1


10 0.00067 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:58 1Barium 0.25 J B

0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:58 1Cadmium 0.0027 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:58 1Chromium 0.0045 J

0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:58 1Lead 0.50 U

0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:58 1Selenium 0.0062 J B

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 09:58 1Silver 0.50 U


Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 09:28 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 18 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





















13 0.41 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼2-Hexanone 13 U H


13 4.1 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Acetone 13 U H

3.3 0.15 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Benzene 3.3 U H






















3.3 0.098 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Styrene 3.3 U H

3.3 0.34 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Tetrachloroethene 3.3 U H *

3.3 0.18 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼Toluene 3.3 U H

3.3 0.27 ug/Kg 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 1☼trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.3 U H *






TestAmerica Canton

Page 19 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14









Toluene-d8 (Surr) 99 03/24/14 13:45 03/27/14 06:46 167 - 125






0.025 0.0065 mg/L 03/31/14 22:22 1Benzene 0.025 U



0.025 0.0080 mg/L 03/31/14 22:22 1Chloroform 0.025 U








Toluene-d8 (Surr) 97 03/31/14 22:22 180 - 120


1,1'-Biphenyl 25 J 220 16 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4


























TestAmerica Canton

Page 20 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Acenaphthylene 30 U 30 1.6 ug/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4



30 3.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Anthracene 90

900 41 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Atrazine 900 U













220 120 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Carbazole 220 U

30 4.9 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Chrysene 1100








30 2.4 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Fluorene 43













220 33 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Phenol 220 U

30 2.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 4☼Pyrene 1000






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 65 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 426 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 82 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 20:18 436 - 110

TestAmerica Canton

Page 21 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Aluminum 1400 16 7.9 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1


0.82 0.32 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Antimony 0.82 U

0.82 0.25 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Arsenic 1.9

16 0.098 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Barium 11 J B

0.41 0.035 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Beryllium 0.058 J

0.16 0.029 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Cadmium 0.062 J

410 24 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Calcium 1400

0.41 0.16 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Chromium 8.6

4.1 0.13 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Cobalt 1.4 J

2.0 0.61 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Copper 8.7

8.2 4.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Iron 8100

0.25 0.16 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Lead 5.9

410 5.3 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Magnesium 510

1.2 0.13 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Manganese 91

3.3 0.44 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Nickel 10

410 5.1 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Potassium 150 J B

0.41 0.37 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Selenium 0.41 U

0.41 0.082 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Silver 0.41 U

410 54 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Sodium 100 J

0.82 0.45 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Thallium 0.82 U

4.1 0.17 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Vanadium 4.6

1.6 0.82 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 14:39 1☼Zinc 11


Mercury 0.035 J 0.11 0.017 mg/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 09:50 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 22 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14


















0.020 0.00035 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 1Pyridine 0.020 U






Phenol-d5 (Surr) 62 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 120 - 110

Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 85 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 12:21 138 - 110


Arsenic 0.0046 J 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 10:03 1


10 0.00067 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 10:03 1Barium 0.18 J B

0.10 0.00066 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 10:03 1Cadmium 0.0012 J

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 10:03 1Chromium 0.010 J

0.50 0.0019 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 10:03 1Lead 0.0064 J

0.25 0.0041 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 10:03 1Selenium 0.0043 J B

0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 10:03 1Silver 0.50 U


Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 09:29 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 23 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Gasoline Range Organics)RL MDL

C6-C10 110 U 110 51 ug/Kg ☼ 03/26/14 11:00 03/26/14 18:56 1


Trifluorotoluene (Surr) 60 40 - 139 03/26/14 11:00 03/26/14 18:56 1


Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Diesel Range Organics)RL MDL

Diesel Range Organics [C10 - C28] 68 18 10 mg/Kg ☼ 03/25/14 13:12 04/01/14 13:40 1


o-Terphenyl (Surr) 75 40 - 160 03/25/14 13:12 04/01/14 13:40 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 24 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





12DCE BFB DBFM TOL

91 80 108 96240-35339-1


BW9 0-2

88 78 109 99240-35339-5 BW10 2-4


83 81 106 92MB 240-123823/3-A Method Blank

Surrogate Legend







12DCE BFB DBFM TOL

84 90 91 100LCS 240-124658/4


Lab Control Sample

Surrogate Legend







12DCE BFB DBFM TOL

87 88 87 97240-35339-1


BW9 0-2

89 87 92 97240-35339-5 BW10 2-4


Surrogate Legend








63 69 67 65 69 85240-35339-2


BW9 2-4

54 63 66 6562 82240-35339-5 BW10 2-4


TestAmerica Canton

Page 25 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






55 79 79 77 80 108MB 240-123875/23-A


Method Blank

Surrogate Legend










95 78 31 72 67 100LCS 240-124527/14-A


Lab Control Sample


80 71 52 6668 98MB 240-124527/13-A Method Blank

67 70 11 4573 98MB 240-125270/3-A Method Blank

Surrogate Legend










57 53 11 54 46 72240-35339-3


BW9 4-8

93 71 37 6469 97240-35339-4 BW10 0-2

55 61 37 6267 85240-35339-6 BW10 4-6

Surrogate Legend







TestAmerica Canton

Page 26 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Gasoline Range Organics)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (40-139) (40-139)

TFT2 TFT2

60 60240-35339-7


BW10 6-8

91 91LCS 240-124056/2-A Lab Control Sample

74 74MB 240-124056/1-A Method Blank

Surrogate Legend

TFT = Trifluorotoluene (Surr)

Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Diesel Range Organics)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Solid


OTPH1

75240-35339-7


BW10 6-8



Surrogate Legend

OTPH = o-Terphenyl (Surr)

TestAmerica Canton

Page 27 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL


MB MB















20 U 0.6320 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 12-Hexanone


20 U 6.320 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Acetone

5.0 U 0.235.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Benzene

5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Bromoform





















5.0 U 0.155.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Styrene


5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Toluene







TestAmerica Canton

Page 28 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








MB MB

Surrogate

03/25/14 04:01




92 03/25/14 04:01 03/27/14 04:38 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125





Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits



ne

25.0 31.6 ug/Kg 127 80 - 138












2-Hexanone 50.0 42.8 ug/Kg 86 64 - 136


Acetone 50.0 41.2 ug/Kg 82 41 - 137

Benzene 25.0 25.8 ug/Kg 103 79 - 120

Bromoform 25.0 26.4 ug/Kg 106 62 - 133






Chloroform 25.0 24.1 ug/Kg 96 77 - 120













TestAmerica Canton

Page 29 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits


o-Xylene 25.0 29.3 ug/Kg 117 80 - 120

Styrene 25.0 26.9 ug/Kg 108 80 - 120


Toluene 25.0 27.5 ug/Kg 110 75 - 120








Surrogate

79

LCS LCS









Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits


2-Butanone (MEK) 2.00 1.93 mg/L 96 49 - 120

Benzene 1.00 0.969 mg/L 97 80 - 120



Chloroform 1.00 0.908 mg/L 91 80 - 123





Surrogate

84

LCS LCS








RL MDL


MB MB



TestAmerica Canton

Page 30 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

2-Butanone (MEK) 0.25 U 0.25 0.029 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1

MB MB


0.025 U 0.00650.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Benzene



0.025 U 0.00800.025 mg/L 03/31/14 16:13 1Chloroform





MB MB




97 03/31/14 16:13 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 80 - 120





RL MDL

1,1'-Biphenyl 50 U 50 3.5 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1

MB MB



























TestAmerica Canton

Page 31 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

Acetophenone 100 U 100 9.2 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1

MB MB



200 U 9.1200 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Atrazine













50 U 2750 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Carbazole

6.7 U 1.16.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Chrysene



16.5 J 1670 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Diethyl phthalate





6.7 U 0.536.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Fluorene













50 U 7.350 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Phenol

6.7 U 0.446.7 ug/Kg 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Pyrene


MB MB

Surrogate

03/25/14 09:59





80 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 26 - 110

108 03/25/14 09:59 03/27/14 11:05 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 36 - 110

TestAmerica Canton

Page 32 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







1,1'-Biphenyl 667 518 ug/Kg 78 35 - 110

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits



























Anthracene 667 571 ug/Kg 86 48 - 110

Atrazine 1330 1300 ug/Kg 97 66 - 127













Carbazole 667 563 ug/Kg 84 50 - 110

Chrysene 667 553 ug/Kg 83 50 - 110






TestAmerica Canton

Page 33 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits


Fluorene 667 552 ug/Kg 83 46 - 110



Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 667 315 J ug/Kg 47 12 - 110



Isophorone 667 511 ug/Kg 77 36 - 110







Phenol 667 545 ug/Kg 82 38 - 110

Pyrene 667 585 ug/Kg 88 49 - 110


Surrogate

82

LCS LCS










RL MDL


MB MB






0.020 U 0.000350.020 mg/L 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Pyridine








MB MB

Surrogate

03/31/14 07:11



TestAmerica Canton

Page 34 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







2-Fluorophenol (Surr) 52 10 - 110 04/03/14 13:17 1

MB MB

Surrogate

03/31/14 07:11



66 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110

98 03/31/14 07:11 04/03/14 13:17 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110





Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits





Pyridine 0.0800 0.0557 mg/L 70 34 - 110








Surrogate

95

LCS LCS










RL MDL


MB MB






0.020 U 0.000350.020 mg/L 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 1Pyridine







TestAmerica Canton

Page 35 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








MB MB

Surrogate

04/04/14 10:04





45 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 1Phenol-d5 (Surr) 20 - 110

98 04/04/14 10:04 04/08/14 11:08 1Terphenyl-d14 (Surr) 38 - 110





Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits





Pyridine 0.0800 0.0522 mg/L 65 34 - 110








Surrogate

73

LCS LCS











RL MDL

C6-C10 100 U 100 46 ug/Kg 03/26/14 11:00 03/26/14 12:51 1

MB MB


100 U 46100 ug/Kg 03/26/14 11:00 03/26/14 12:51 1C6-C10

Trifluorotoluene (Surr) 74 40 - 139 03/26/14 12:51 1

MB MB

Surrogate

03/26/14 11:00


74 03/26/14 11:00 03/26/14 12:51 1Trifluorotoluene (Surr) 40 - 139

TestAmerica Canton

Page 36 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




(Continued)




Trifluorotoluene (Surr) 40 - 139

Surrogate

91

LCS LCS


91Trifluorotoluene (Surr) 40 - 139

Method: 8015C - Nonhalogenated Organics using GC/FID -Modified (Diesel Range Organics)




RL MDL

Diesel Range Organics [C10 - C28] 17 U 17 9.3 mg/Kg 03/25/14 13:12 03/31/14 15:06 1

MB MB


o-Terphenyl (Surr) 72 40 - 160 03/31/14 15:06 1

MB MB

Surrogate

03/25/14 13:12





Diesel Range Organics [C10 -

C28]

83.3 77.0 mg/Kg 92 52 - 120

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

o-Terphenyl (Surr) 40 - 160

Surrogate

91

LCS LCS






RL MDL

Aluminum 20 U 20 9.6 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1

MB MB


1.0 U 0.391.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Antimony

1.0 U 0.301.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Arsenic

0.170 J 0.1220 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Barium

0.50 U 0.0430.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Beryllium

0.20 U 0.0360.20 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Cadmium

500 U 29500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Calcium

0.50 U 0.200.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Chromium

5.0 U 0.165.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Cobalt

2.5 U 0.742.5 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Copper

10 U 4.910 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Iron

0.30 U 0.190.30 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Lead

500 U 6.5500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Magnesium

TestAmerica Canton

Page 37 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

Manganese 1.5 U 1.5 0.16 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1

MB MB


4.0 U 0.544.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Nickel

12.8 J 6.2500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Potassium

0.50 U 0.450.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Selenium

0.50 U 0.100.50 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Silver

500 U 66500 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Sodium

1.0 U 0.551.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Thallium

5.0 U 0.215.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Vanadium

2.0 U 1.02.0 mg/Kg 03/26/14 10:45 03/27/14 13:51 1Zinc




Aluminum 200 191 mg/Kg 95 80 - 120

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Antimony 50.0 46.7 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Arsenic 200 188 mg/Kg 94 80 - 120

Barium 200 192 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120

Beryllium 5.00 4.52 mg/Kg 90 80 - 120

Cadmium 5.00 4.76 mg/Kg 95 80 - 120

Calcium 5000 4660 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Chromium 20.0 19.3 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120

Cobalt 50.0 46.0 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Copper 25.0 23.3 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Iron 100 106 mg/Kg 106 80 - 120

Lead 50.0 46.2 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Magnesium 5000 4600 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Manganese 50.0 48.0 mg/Kg 96 80 - 120

Nickel 50.0 46.2 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Potassium 5000 4650 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Selenium 200 183 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Silver 5.00 4.92 mg/Kg 98 80 - 120

Sodium 5000 4670 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Thallium 200 185 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120

Vanadium 50.0 46.7 mg/Kg 93 80 - 120

Zinc 50.0 46.1 mg/Kg 92 80 - 120




RL MDL

Arsenic 0.50 U 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1

MB MB


0.00102 J 0.0006710 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Barium

0.10 U 0.000660.10 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Cadmium

0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Chromium

0.50 U 0.00190.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Lead

0.25 U 0.00410.25 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1Selenium

TestAmerica Canton

Page 38 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

Silver 0.50 U 0.50 0.0022 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:09 1

MB MB





Arsenic 2.00 2.02 mg/L 101 50 - 150

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Barium 2.00 1.85 J mg/L 93 50 - 150

Cadmium 0.0500 0.0499 J mg/L 100 50 - 150

Chromium 0.200 0.193 J mg/L 96 50 - 150

Lead 0.500 0.447 J mg/L 89 50 - 150

Selenium 2.00 2.09 mg/L 105 50 - 150

Silver 0.0500 0.0529 J mg/L 106 50 - 150




RL MDL

Arsenic 0.50 U 0.50 0.0032 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1

LB LB


0.00218 J 0.0006710 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Barium

0.10 U 0.000660.10 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Cadmium

0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Chromium

0.50 U 0.00190.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Lead

0.00562 J 0.00410.25 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Selenium

0.50 U 0.00220.50 mg/L 03/31/14 09:48 04/01/14 08:04 1Silver





RL MDL

Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 08:58 1

MB MB





Mercury 0.00500 0.00485 mg/L 97 50 - 150

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

TestAmerica Canton

Page 39 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) (Continued)

Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: LB 240-124505/1-E



RL MDL

Mercury 0.0020 U 0.0020 0.00012 mg/L 03/31/14 15:25 04/01/14 08:56 1

LB LB






RL MDL

Mercury 0.10 U 0.10 0.015 mg/Kg 03/26/14 14:45 03/27/14 08:54 1

MB MB





Mercury 0.833 0.856 mg/Kg 103 73 - 121

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

TestAmerica Canton

Page 40 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



GC/MS VOA

Prep Batch: 123823


Solid 5035240-35339-1 BW9 0-2 Total/NA

Solid 5035240-35339-5 BW10 2-4 Total/NA








Leach Batch: 124562


Solid 1311240-35339-1 BW9 0-2 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35339-5 BW10 2-4 TCLP




Solid 8260B 124562240-35339-1 BW9 0-2 TCLP

Solid 8260B 124562240-35339-5 BW10 2-4 TCLP



GC/MS Semi VOA

Prep Batch: 123875












Leach Batch: 124505


Solid 1311240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 TCLP

Prep Batch: 124527


Solid 3520C 124505240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 TCLP


TestAmerica Canton

Page 41 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14









Solid 8270C 124527240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 TCLP





Prep Batch: 125270


Solid 3520C 124505240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 TCLP

Solid 3520C 124505240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 TCLP





Solid 8270C 125270240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 TCLP

Solid 8270C 125270240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 TCLP



GC VOA





Prep Batch: 124056










GC Semi VOA

Prep Batch: 123937




TestAmerica Canton

Page 42 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



GC Semi VOA (Continued)











Metals

Prep Batch: 124048






Prep Batch: 124076


















Leach Batch: 124505


Solid 1311240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 TCLP

Solid 1311240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 TCLP


Solid 1311LB 240-124505/1-E Method Blank TCLP

TestAmerica Canton

Page 43 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Metals (Continued)

Prep Batch: 124584


Solid 3010A 124505240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 TCLP

Solid 3010A 124505240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 TCLP

Solid 3010A 124505240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 TCLP




Prep Batch: 124593


Solid 7470A 124505240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124505240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124505240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 TCLP






Solid 6010B 124584240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 TCLP

Solid 6010B 124584240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 TCLP

Solid 6010B 124584240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 TCLP

Solid 6010B 124584LB 240-124505/1-D Method Blank TCLP





Solid 7470A 124593240-35339-3 BW9 4-8 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124593240-35339-4 BW10 0-2 TCLP

Solid 7470A 124593240-35339-6 BW10 4-6 TCLP




General Chemistry








TestAmerica Canton

Page 44 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP







Prep 3540C 03/25/14 09:59 MPM123875 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA









Leach 1311 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ124505 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP











Leach 1311 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ124505 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP




TestAmerica Canton

Page 45 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Prep 3010A 03/31/14 09:48 DEE124584 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP







Leach 1311 03/30/14 17:30 DRJ124562 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP













Leach 1311 03/30/14 16:00 DRJ124505 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

TCLP









TestAmerica Canton

Page 46 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Prep 5030A 03/26/14 11:00 KMG124056 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA

Analysis 8015C 1 124065 03/26/14 18:56 KMG TAL CANTotal/NA


Analysis 8015C 1 124784 04/01/14 13:40 DEB TAL CANTotal/NA




TestAmerica Canton

Page 47 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14










Kansas NELAP 7 E-10336 03-31-14 *


L-A-B DoD ELAP L2315 07-18-16

Minnesota NELAP 5 039-999-348 12-31-14



New York NELAP 2 10975 03-31-14 *




USDA Federal P330-13-00319 11-26-16





TestAmerica Canton


Page 48 of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

of 51 4/9/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Appendix I

Soil analytical results for borings BW-7A,

BW-8A, BW-9A and BW-10A and water

analytical results for temporary

monitoring wells BW-1 and BW-2


TestAmerica Job ID: 240-35621-1Client Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio







1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Table of Contents

Client: Bennett & Williams Env. Consultants Inc.Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio



4/14/2014

Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1



Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8






Lab Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42


Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14


Project/Site: Lancaster, Ohio

Qualifiers

GC/MS VOA



Qualifier




Metals



Qualifier



4 MS, MSD: The analyte present in the original sample is greater than 4 times the matrix spike concentration; therefore, control limits are not

applicable.

F1 MS and/or MSD Recovery exceeds the control limits

Glossary



Abbreviation

%R Percent Recovery











NC Not Calculated



QC Quality Control






TestAmerica Canton

Page 3 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Job ID: 240-35621-1


Narrative

CASE NARRATIVE


Project: Lancaster, Ohio


















method header.


RECEIPT




Samples BW7A 2-4 (240-35621-1), BW8A 4-6 (240-35621-2), BW9A 0-2 (240-35621-3) and BW10A 2-4 (240-35621-4) were analyzed for

volatile organic compounds (GCMS) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8260B. The samples were prepared on 04/01/2014 and

analyzed on 04/02/2014.




Bromomethane failed the recovery criteria high for LCS 240-124999/5. This compound has been identified as a poor performing analyte

when analyzed using this method; therefore, re-extraction/re-analysis was not performed. These results have been reported and qualified.

An additional 5 mls of methanol was added to these samples, due to heavy sample weights.


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






with batch 124999 on these samples BW10A 2-4 (240-35621-4), BW7A 2-4 (240-35621-1), BW8A 4-6 (240-35621-2), BW9A 0-2

(240-35621-3).



Samples BW4 (240-35621-5), BW1 (240-35621-6) and TRIP BLANK (240-35621-8) were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (GCMS)

in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method 8260B. The samples were analyzed on 04/07/2014 and 04/09/2014.

Acetone was detected in method blank MB 240-125462/5 at a level that was above the method detection limit but below the reporting limit.

The value should be considered an estimate, and has been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above the MDL and/or RL,

the result has been flagged.

Methylene Chloride was detected in method blank MB 240-125725/6 at a level that was above the method detection limit but below the


MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged.

Chloroethane and Trichlorofluoromethane failed the recovery criteria high for LCS 240-125462/4. These analytes have been identified as

a poor performing analytes when analyzed using this method; therefore, re-extraction/re-analysis was not performed.

2-Butanone (MEK) failed the recovery criteria high for LCS 240-125725/4. This analyte was biased high in the LCS and was not detected

in the associated samples; therefore, the data has been reported.


DISSOLVED METALS (ICP)

Samples BW1 (240-35621-6) and BW4 (240-35621-7) were analyzed for dissolved metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA SW-846 Method

6010B. The samples were prepared on 04/02/2014 and analyzed on 04/03/2014.

Calcium and Iron failed the recovery criteria high for the MSD of sample BW4MSD (240-35621-7) in batch 240-125100.


TOTAL RECOVERABLE METALS (ICP)

Samples BW4 (240-35621-5) and BW1 (240-35621-6) were analyzed for total recoverable metals (ICP) in accordance with EPA SW-846

Method 6010B. The samples were prepared on 04/02/2014 and analyzed on 04/03/2014.

Barium, Calcium and Zinc were detected in method blank MB 240-124891/1-A at levels that were above the method detection limit but

below the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result

above the MDL and/or RL, the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details.

Samples BW4 (240-35621-5)[5X] and BW1 (240-35621-6)[5X] required dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted

accordingly.


DISSOLVED MERCURY (CVAA)

Samples BW1 (240-35621-6) and BW4 (240-35621-7) were analyzed for dissolved mercury (CVAA) in accordance with EPA SW-846

Methods 7470A. The samples were prepared on 04/02/2014 and analyzed on 04/03/2014.


TOTAL MERCURY

Samples BW4 (240-35621-5) and BW1 (240-35621-6) were analyzed for total mercury in accordance with EPA SW-846 Methods 7470A.


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14






Samples BW4 (240-35621-5)[2X] and BW1 (240-35621-6)[10X] required dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted

accordingly.


PERCENT SOLIDS

Samples BW7A 2-4 (240-35621-1), BW8A 4-6 (240-35621-2), BW9A 0-2 (240-35621-3) and BW10A 2-4 (240-35621-4) were analyzed for

percent solids in accordance with EPA Method 160.3 MOD. The samples were analyzed on 04/01/2014.



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14













TestAmerica Canton

Page 7 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




240-35621-1 BW7A 2-4 Solid 03/31/14 07:20 04/01/14 09:40

240-35621-2 BW8A 4-6 Solid 03/31/14 07:35 04/01/14 09:40

240-35621-3 BW9A 0-2 Solid 03/31/14 07:50 04/01/14 09:40

240-35621-4 BW10A 2-4 Solid 03/31/14 08:00 04/01/14 09:40

240-35621-5 BW4 Water 03/31/14 09:30 04/01/14 09:40

240-35621-6 BW1 Water 03/31/14 10:10 04/01/14 09:40

240-35621-7 BW4 Water 03/31/14 10:55 04/01/14 09:40

240-35621-8 TRIP BLANK Water 03/31/14 00:00 04/01/14 09:40

TestAmerica Canton

Page 8 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Client Sample ID: BW7A 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-1

No Detections.


No Detections.


☼Acetone

RL

12 ug/Kg

MDL

3.8


Total/NA1J7.0 8260B

☼Methylene Chloride 3.0 ug/Kg0.40 Total/NA10.41 J 8260B


No Detections.

Client Sample ID: BW4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-5

2-Butanone (MEK)

RL

10 ug/L

MDL

0.57


Total/NA1J0.61 8260B

Acetone 10 ug/L1.1 Total/NA14.0 J B 8260B

Aluminum 200 ug/L97 Total

Recoverable

1100000 6010B

Antimony 10 ug/L2.1 Total

Recoverable

135 6010B

Arsenic 10 ug/L3.2 Total

Recoverable

1700 6010B

Barium 200 ug/L0.67 Total

Recoverable

14900 B 6010B

Beryllium 5.0 ug/L0.46 Total

Recoverable

19.9 6010B

Cadmium 2.0 ug/L0.66 Total

Recoverable

11200 6010B

Calcium 5000 ug/L130 Total

Recoverable

1250000 B 6010B

Chromium 5.0 ug/L2.2 Total

Recoverable

11300 6010B

Cobalt 7.0 ug/L1.7 Total

Recoverable

1120 6010B

Copper 25 ug/L4.5 Total

Recoverable

13100 6010B

Iron 100 ug/L81 Total

Recoverable

1480000 6010B

Lead 15 ug/L9.5 Total

Recoverable

518000 6010B

Magnesium 5000 ug/L34 Total

Recoverable

144000 6010B

Manganese 15 ug/L0.96 Total

Recoverable

16000 6010B

Nickel 40 ug/L3.2 Total

Recoverable

1690 6010B

Potassium 5000 ug/L72 Total

Recoverable

119000 6010B

Selenium 5.0 ug/L4.1 Total

Recoverable

17000 6010B

Silver 5.0 ug/L2.2 Total

Recoverable

1850 6010B

TestAmerica Canton


Page 9 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Client Sample ID: BW4 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-5

Sodium

RL

5000 ug/L

MDL

590


Total

Recoverable

159000 6010B

Thallium 10 ug/L4.7 Total

Recoverable

17.7 J 6010B

Vanadium 7.0 ug/L2.4 Total

Recoverable

1250 6010B

Zinc 250 ug/L25 Total

Recoverable

529000 B 6010B

Mercury 0.40 ug/L0.24 Total/NA216 7470A


Acetone

RL

10 ug/L

MDL

1.1



Carbon disulfide 1.0 ug/L0.13 Total/NA10.69 J 8260B

Aluminum 200 ug/L97 Total

Recoverable

159000 6010B

Antimony 10 ug/L2.1 Total

Recoverable

120 6010B

Arsenic 10 ug/L3.2 Total

Recoverable

1210 6010B

Barium 200 ug/L0.67 Total

Recoverable

16300 B 6010B

Beryllium 5.0 ug/L0.46 Total

Recoverable

14.5 J 6010B

Cadmium 2.0 ug/L0.66 Total

Recoverable

118 6010B

Calcium 5000 ug/L130 Total

Recoverable

1350000 B 6010B

Chromium 5.0 ug/L2.2 Total

Recoverable

1800 6010B

Cobalt 7.0 ug/L1.7 Total

Recoverable

124 6010B

Copper 25 ug/L4.5 Total

Recoverable

1770 6010B

Iron 100 ug/L81 Total

Recoverable

1230000 6010B

Lead 3.0 ug/L1.9 Total

Recoverable

14500 6010B

Magnesium 5000 ug/L34 Total

Recoverable

159000 6010B

Manganese 15 ug/L0.96 Total

Recoverable

12800 6010B

Nickel 40 ug/L3.2 Total

Recoverable

1110 6010B

Potassium 5000 ug/L72 Total

Recoverable

126000 6010B

Selenium 5.0 ug/L4.1 Total

Recoverable

114 6010B

Silver 5.0 ug/L2.2 Total

Recoverable

19.7 6010B

Sodium 5000 ug/L590 Total

Recoverable

1330000 6010B

Vanadium 7.0 ug/L2.4 Total

Recoverable

168 6010B

Zinc 250 ug/L25 Total

Recoverable

511000 B 6010B

TestAmerica Canton


Page 10 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Client Sample ID: BW1 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-6

Arsenic

RL

10 ug/L

MDL

3.2


Dissolved1J7.8 6010B

Barium 200 ug/L0.67 Dissolved1400 B 6010B

Calcium 5000 ug/L130 Dissolved1290000 B 6010B

Chromium 5.0 ug/L2.2 Dissolved13.3 J 6010B

Iron 100 ug/L81 Dissolved115000 6010B

Lead 3.0 ug/L1.9 Dissolved12.7 J 6010B

Magnesium 5000 ug/L34 Dissolved145000 6010B

Manganese 15 ug/L0.96 Dissolved11000 6010B

Nickel 40 ug/L3.2 Dissolved14.9 J 6010B

Potassium 5000 ug/L72 Dissolved117000 6010B

Sodium 5000 ug/L590 Dissolved1360000 6010B

Zinc 50 ug/L5.0 Dissolved147 J B 6010B

Mercury 2.0 ug/L1.2 Total/NA1046 7470A


Arsenic

RL

10 ug/L

MDL

3.2


Dissolved143 6010B

Barium 200 ug/L0.67 Dissolved1210 B 6010B

Calcium 5000 ug/L130 Dissolved1160000 B 6010B

Cobalt 7.0 ug/L1.7 Dissolved13.7 J 6010B

Iron 100 ug/L81 Dissolved15100 6010B

Magnesium 5000 ug/L34 Dissolved123000 6010B

Manganese 15 ug/L0.96 Dissolved11100 6010B

Nickel 40 ug/L3.2 Dissolved19.4 J 6010B

Potassium 5000 ug/L72 Dissolved18700 6010B

Selenium 5.0 ug/L4.1 Dissolved14.9 J 6010B

Sodium 5000 ug/L590 Dissolved162000 6010B

Zinc 50 ug/L5.0 Dissolved1130 B 6010B

Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANK Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-8

Methylene Chloride

RL

1.0 ug/L

MDL

0.33



TestAmerica Canton


Page 11 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-1Client Sample ID: BW7A 2-4Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/31/14 07:20


















11 0.35 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼2-Hexanone 11 U


11 3.5 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Acetone 11 U

2.8 0.13 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Benzene 2.8 U

2.8 0.18 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Bromoform 2.8 U

2.8 0.30 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Bromomethane 2.8 U *




















2.8 0.084 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Styrene 2.8 U


2.8 0.15 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 1☼Toluene 2.8 U







TestAmerica Canton

Page 12 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14









Toluene-d8 (Surr) 95 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:21 167 - 125

TestAmerica Canton

Page 13 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




















9.3 0.65 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼2-Butanone (MEK) 9.3 U

9.3 0.29 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼2-Hexanone 9.3 U

9.3 0.25 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 9.3 U

9.3 2.9 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Acetone 9.3 U

2.3 0.11 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Benzene 2.3 U

2.3 0.15 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Bromoform 2.3 U





















2.3 0.070 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Styrene 2.3 U


2.3 0.13 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 1☼Toluene 2.3 U







TestAmerica Canton

Page 14 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14









Toluene-d8 (Surr) 95 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 22:42 167 - 125

TestAmerica Canton

Page 15 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





















12 0.38 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼2-Hexanone 12 U


12 3.8 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Acetone 7.0 J

3.0 0.14 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Benzene 3.0 U

3.0 0.20 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Bromoform 3.0 U




















3.0 0.40 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Methylene Chloride 0.41 J

3.0 0.090 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Styrene 3.0 U


3.0 0.16 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 1☼Toluene 3.0 U







TestAmerica Canton

Page 16 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14









Toluene-d8 (Surr) 99 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:04 167 - 125

TestAmerica Canton

Page 17 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





















10 0.32 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼2-Hexanone 10 U


10 3.2 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Acetone 10 U

2.5 0.12 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Benzene 2.5 U

2.5 0.17 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Bromoform 2.5 U





















2.5 0.076 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Styrene 2.5 U


2.5 0.14 ug/Kg 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 1☼Toluene 2.5 U







TestAmerica Canton

Page 18 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14









Toluene-d8 (Surr) 98 04/01/14 17:00 04/02/14 23:27 167 - 125

TestAmerica Canton

Page 19 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-5Client Sample ID: BW4Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 09:30



1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0 U 1.0 0.22 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1


1.0 0.18 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 U

1.0 0.28 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 1.0 U

1.0 0.27 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.0 U

1.0 0.15 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,1-Dichloroethane 1.0 U

1.0 0.19 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,1-Dichloroethene 1.0 U

1.0 0.15 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1.0 U

2.0 0.67 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 2.0 U

1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 U


1.0 0.18 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 11,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 U



10 0.57 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 12-Butanone (MEK) 0.61 J

10 0.41 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 12-Hexanone 10 U

10 0.32 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 10 U

10 1.1 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Acetone 4.0 J B

1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Benzene 1.0 U

1.0 0.64 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Bromoform 1.0 U

1.0 0.41 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Bromomethane 1.0 U

1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Carbon disulfide 1.0 U

1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Carbon tetrachloride 1.0 U

1.0 0.15 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Chlorobenzene 1.0 U

1.0 0.18 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Chlorodibromomethane 1.0 U

1.0 0.29 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Chloroethane 1.0 U *

1.0 0.16 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Chloroform 1.0 U

1.0 0.30 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Chloromethane 1.0 U

1.0 0.17 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 U

1.0 0.14 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 U

1.0 0.12 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Cyclohexane 1.0 U

1.0 0.15 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Dichlorobromomethane 1.0 U

1.0 0.31 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 U

1.0 0.17 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Ethylbenzene 1.0 U

1.0 0.24 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Ethylene Dibromide 1.0 U

1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Isopropylbenzene 1.0 U

10 0.38 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Methyl acetate 10 U

1.0 0.17 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Methyl tert-butyl ether 1.0 U

1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Methylcyclohexane 1.0 U

1.0 0.33 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Methylene Chloride 1.0 U

1.0 0.11 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Styrene 1.0 U

1.0 0.29 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Tetrachloroethene 1.0 U

1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Toluene 1.0 U

1.0 0.19 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 U

1.0 0.19 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 U

1.0 0.17 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Trichloroethene 1.0 U

1.0 0.21 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 U *

1.0 0.22 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Vinyl chloride 1.0 U

2.0 0.14 ug/L 04/07/14 17:34 1Xylenes, Total 2.0 U

TestAmerica Canton

Page 20 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14









Toluene-d8 (Surr) 91 04/07/14 17:34 174 - 120

Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total RecoverableRL MDL

Aluminum 100000 200 97 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1


10 2.1 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Antimony 35

10 3.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Arsenic 700

200 0.67 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Barium 4900 B

5.0 0.46 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Beryllium 9.9

2.0 0.66 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Cadmium 1200

5000 130 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Calcium 250000 B

5.0 2.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Chromium 1300

7.0 1.7 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Cobalt 120

25 4.5 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Copper 3100

100 81 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Iron 480000

15 9.5 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:05 5Lead 18000

5000 34 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Magnesium 44000

15 0.96 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Manganese 6000

40 3.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Nickel 690

5000 72 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Potassium 19000

5.0 4.1 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Selenium 7000

5.0 2.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Silver 850

5000 590 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Sodium 59000

10 4.7 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Thallium 7.7 J

7.0 2.4 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:01 1Vanadium 250

250 25 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:05 5Zinc 29000 B


Mercury 16 0.40 0.24 ug/L 04/02/14 13:00 04/03/14 13:12 2


TestAmerica Canton

Page 21 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14




















10 0.57 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 12-Butanone (MEK) 10 U

10 0.41 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 12-Hexanone 10 U


10 1.1 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Acetone 3.0 J B

1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Benzene 1.0 U

1.0 0.64 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Bromoform 1.0 U


1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Carbon disulfide 0.69 J




1.0 0.29 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Chloroethane 1.0 U *

1.0 0.16 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Chloroform 1.0 U













1.0 0.33 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Methylene Chloride 1.0 U

1.0 0.11 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Styrene 1.0 U


1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Toluene 1.0 U




1.0 0.21 ug/L 04/07/14 17:56 1Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 U *



TestAmerica Canton

Page 22 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14









Toluene-d8 (Surr) 90 04/07/14 17:56 174 - 120

Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Total RecoverableRL MDL

Aluminum 59000 200 97 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1


10 2.1 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Antimony 20

10 3.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Arsenic 210

200 0.67 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Barium 6300 B

5.0 0.46 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Beryllium 4.5 J

2.0 0.66 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Cadmium 18

5000 130 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Calcium 350000 B

5.0 2.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Chromium 800

7.0 1.7 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Cobalt 24

25 4.5 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Copper 770

100 81 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Iron 230000

3.0 1.9 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Lead 4500

5000 34 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Magnesium 59000

15 0.96 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Manganese 2800

40 3.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Nickel 110

5000 72 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Potassium 26000

5.0 4.1 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Selenium 14

5.0 2.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Silver 9.7

5000 590 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Sodium 330000

10 4.7 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Thallium 10 U

7.0 2.4 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:09 1Vanadium 68

250 25 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:14 5Zinc 11000 B

Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - DissolvedRL MDL

Aluminum 200 U 200 97 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1


10 2.1 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Antimony 10 U

10 3.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Arsenic 7.8 J

200 0.67 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Barium 400 B

5.0 0.46 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Beryllium 5.0 U

2.0 0.66 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Cadmium 2.0 U

5000 130 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Calcium 290000 B

5.0 2.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Chromium 3.3 J

7.0 1.7 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Cobalt 7.0 U

25 4.5 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Copper 25 U

100 81 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Iron 15000

3.0 1.9 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Lead 2.7 J

5000 34 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Magnesium 45000

15 0.96 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Manganese 1000

40 3.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Nickel 4.9 J

5000 72 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Potassium 17000

5.0 4.1 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Selenium 5.0 U

5.0 2.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Silver 5.0 U

TestAmerica Canton

Page 23 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - Dissolved (Continued)RL MDL

Sodium 360000 5000 590 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1


10 4.7 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Thallium 10 U

7.0 2.4 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Vanadium 7.0 U

50 5.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 12:17 1Zinc 47 J B


Mercury 46 2.0 1.2 ug/L 04/02/14 13:00 04/03/14 13:14 10


Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - DissolvedRL MDL

Mercury 0.20 U 0.20 0.12 ug/L 04/02/14 13:00 04/03/14 11:59 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 24 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Method: 6010B - Metals (ICP) - DissolvedRL MDL

Aluminum 200 U 200 97 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1


10 2.1 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Antimony 10 U

10 3.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Arsenic 43

200 0.67 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Barium 210 B

5.0 0.46 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Beryllium 5.0 U

2.0 0.66 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Cadmium 2.0 U

5000 130 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Calcium 160000 B

5.0 2.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Chromium 5.0 U

7.0 1.7 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Cobalt 3.7 J

25 4.5 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Copper 25 U

100 81 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Iron 5100

3.0 1.9 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Lead 3.0 U

5000 34 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Magnesium 23000

15 0.96 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Manganese 1100

40 3.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Nickel 9.4 J

5000 72 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Potassium 8700

5.0 4.1 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Selenium 4.9 J

5.0 2.2 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Silver 5.0 U

5000 590 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Sodium 62000

10 4.7 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Thallium 10 U

7.0 2.4 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Vanadium 7.0 U

50 5.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:29 1Zinc 130 B

Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) - DissolvedRL MDL

Mercury 0.20 U 0.20 0.12 ug/L 04/02/14 13:00 04/03/14 11:49 1


TestAmerica Canton

Page 25 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-8Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANKMatrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 00:00

















10 0.57 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 12-Butanone (MEK) 10 U *

10 0.41 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 12-Hexanone 10 U


10 1.1 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Acetone 10 U

1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Benzene 1.0 U

1.0 0.64 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Bromoform 1.0 U


1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Carbon disulfide 1.0 U




1.0 0.29 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Chloroethane 1.0 U

1.0 0.16 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Chloroform 1.0 U













1.0 0.33 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Methylene Chloride 0.41 J B

1.0 0.11 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Styrene 1.0 U


1.0 0.13 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Toluene 1.0 U




1.0 0.21 ug/L 04/09/14 01:26 1Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 U



TestAmerica Canton

Page 26 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-8Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANKMatrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 00:00






Toluene-d8 (Surr) 91 04/09/14 01:26 174 - 120

TestAmerica Canton

Page 27 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





12DCE BFB DBFM TOL

111 100 87 95240-35621-1


BW7A 2-4

105 91 86 95240-35621-2 BW8A 4-6

104 97 87 99240-35621-3 BW9A 0-2

114 108 85 98240-35621-4 BW10A 2-4


101 90 86 91MB 240-124999/6 Method Blank

Surrogate Legend





Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Water


12DCE BFB DBFM TOL

114 82 99 91240-35621-5


BW4

112 84 103 90240-35621-6 BW1

93 86 89 91240-35621-8 TRIP BLANK



116 86 99 87MB 240-125462/5 Method Blank

91 84 89 88MB 240-125725/6 Method Blank

Surrogate Legend





TestAmerica Canton

Page 28 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL


MB MB















20 U 0.6320 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 12-Hexanone


20 U 6.320 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Acetone

5.0 U 0.235.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Benzene

5.0 U 0.335.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Bromoform




















5.0 U 0.675.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Methylene Chloride

5.0 U 0.155.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Styrene


5.0 U 0.275.0 ug/Kg 04/02/14 17:31 1Toluene







TestAmerica Canton

Page 29 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








MB MB




91 04/02/14 17:31 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 67 - 125





Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits



ne

50.0 49.7 ug/Kg 99 80 - 138











2-Butanone (MEK) 100 109 ug/Kg 109 52 - 131

2-Hexanone 100 113 ug/Kg 113 64 - 136

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 100 121 ug/Kg 121 67 - 135

Acetone 100 121 ug/Kg 121 41 - 137

Benzene 50.0 51.0 ug/Kg 102 79 - 120

Bromoform 50.0 51.1 ug/Kg 102 62 - 133

Bromomethane 50.0 72.8 * ug/Kg 146 42 - 136





Chloroform 50.0 52.1 ug/Kg 104 77 - 120













TestAmerica Canton

Page 30 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits


o-Xylene 50.0 51.1 ug/Kg 102 80 - 120

Styrene 50.0 48.8 ug/Kg 98 80 - 120


Toluene 50.0 51.3 ug/Kg 103 75 - 120








Surrogate

99

LCS LCS






Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA


RL MDL


MB MB


1.0 U 0.181.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

1.0 U 0.281.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane

1.0 U 0.271.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,1,2-Trichloroethane

1.0 U 0.151.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,1-Dichloroethane

1.0 U 0.191.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,1-Dichloroethene

1.0 U 0.151.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

2.0 U 0.672.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane

1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,2-Dichlorobenzene


1.0 U 0.181.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 11,2-Dichloropropane



10 U 0.5710 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 12-Butanone (MEK)

10 U 0.4110 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 12-Hexanone

10 U 0.3210 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)

1.67 J 1.110 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Acetone

1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Benzene

1.0 U 0.641.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Bromoform

1.0 U 0.411.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Bromomethane

1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Carbon disulfide

1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Carbon tetrachloride

1.0 U 0.151.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Chlorobenzene

1.0 U 0.181.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Chlorodibromomethane

TestAmerica Canton

Page 31 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL

Chloroethane 1.0 U 1.0 0.29 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1

MB MB


1.0 U 0.161.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Chloroform

1.0 U 0.301.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Chloromethane

1.0 U 0.171.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene

1.0 U 0.141.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

1.0 U 0.121.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Cyclohexane

1.0 U 0.151.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Dichlorobromomethane

1.0 U 0.311.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Dichlorodifluoromethane

1.0 U 0.171.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Ethylbenzene

1.0 U 0.241.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Ethylene Dibromide

1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Isopropylbenzene

10 U 0.3810 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Methyl acetate

1.0 U 0.171.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Methyl tert-butyl ether

1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Methylcyclohexane

1.0 U 0.331.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Methylene Chloride

1.0 U 0.111.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Styrene

1.0 U 0.291.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Tetrachloroethene

1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Toluene

1.0 U 0.191.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene

1.0 U 0.191.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

1.0 U 0.171.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Trichloroethene

1.0 U 0.211.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Trichlorofluoromethane

1.0 U 0.221.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Vinyl chloride

2.0 U 0.142.0 ug/L 04/07/14 10:49 1Xylenes, Total


MB MB




87 04/07/14 10:49 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 74 - 120




1,1,1-Trichloroethane 10.0 10.1 ug/L 101 74 - 120

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 10.0 9.10 ug/L 91 68 - 120


ne

10.0 10.8 ug/L 108 74 - 151


1,1-Dichloroethane 10.0 10.8 ug/L 108 80 - 120

1,1-Dichloroethene 10.0 9.37 ug/L 94 78 - 131

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10.0 9.31 ug/L 93 48 - 135

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 10.0 8.01 ug/L 80 42 - 136

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10.0 9.98 ug/L 100 80 - 120


1,2-Dichloropropane 10.0 11.7 ug/L 117 80 - 120

TestAmerica Canton

Page 32 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits


2-Butanone (MEK) 20.0 22.4 ug/L 112 60 - 126

2-Hexanone 20.0 23.2 ug/L 116 55 - 133

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 20.0 23.2 ug/L 116 63 - 128

Acetone 20.0 19.7 ug/L 98 43 - 136

Benzene 10.0 10.8 ug/L 108 80 - 120

Bromoform 10.0 9.99 ug/L 100 40 - 131

Bromomethane 10.0 14.9 ug/L 149 11 - 185

Carbon disulfide 10.0 9.76 ug/L 98 62 - 142

Carbon tetrachloride 10.0 11.0 ug/L 110 66 - 128

Chlorobenzene 10.0 10.3 ug/L 103 80 - 120

Chloroethane 10.0 16.4 * ug/L 164 25 - 153

Chloroform 10.0 10.9 ug/L 109 79 - 120

Chloromethane 10.0 11.0 ug/L 110 44 - 126

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 10.0 10.6 ug/L 106 80 - 120

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10.0 11.0 ug/L 110 61 - 120

Cyclohexane 10.0 10.6 ug/L 106 54 - 121

Dichlorobromomethane 10.0 11.8 ug/L 118 72 - 121

Dichlorodifluoromethane 10.0 7.61 ug/L 76 19 - 129

Ethylbenzene 10.0 10.5 ug/L 105 80 - 120

Ethylene Dibromide 10.0 10.6 ug/L 106 79 - 120

Isopropylbenzene 10.0 10.1 ug/L 101 75 - 120

Methyl acetate 50.0 52.3 ug/L 105 58 - 131

Methyl tert-butyl ether 10.0 10.3 ug/L 103 52 - 144

Methylcyclohexane 10.0 10.0 ug/L 100 56 - 127

Methylene Chloride 10.0 10.6 ug/L 106 66 - 131

m-Xylene & p-Xylene 10.0 10.8 ug/L 108 80 - 120

o-Xylene 10.0 10.4 ug/L 104 80 - 120

Styrene 10.0 11.1 ug/L 111 79 - 120

Tetrachloroethene 10.0 9.50 ug/L 95 79 - 120

Toluene 10.0 10.7 ug/L 107 80 - 120

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 10.0 10.4 ug/L 104 80 - 120

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10.0 11.4 ug/L 114 58 - 120

Trichloroethene 10.0 11.0 ug/L 110 76 - 120

Trichlorofluoromethane 10.0 16.0 * ug/L 160 49 - 157

Vinyl chloride 10.0 10.7 ug/L 107 53 - 127

Xylenes, Total 20.0 21.2 ug/L 106 80 - 120


Surrogate

105

LCS LCS





TestAmerica Canton

Page 33 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







RL MDL


MB MB


1.0 U 0.181.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

1.0 U 0.281.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane

1.0 U 0.271.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,1,2-Trichloroethane


1.0 U 0.191.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,1-Dichloroethene

1.0 U 0.151.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

2.0 U 0.672.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane



1.0 U 0.181.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 11,2-Dichloropropane



10 U 0.5710 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 12-Butanone (MEK)

10 U 0.4110 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 12-Hexanone

10 U 0.3210 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)

10 U 1.110 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Acetone

1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Benzene

1.0 U 0.641.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Bromoform

1.0 U 0.411.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Bromomethane

1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Carbon disulfide

1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Carbon tetrachloride

1.0 U 0.151.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Chlorobenzene

1.0 U 0.181.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Chlorodibromomethane

1.0 U 0.291.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Chloroethane

1.0 U 0.161.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Chloroform

1.0 U 0.301.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Chloromethane

1.0 U 0.171.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene

1.0 U 0.141.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

1.0 U 0.121.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Cyclohexane

1.0 U 0.151.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Dichlorobromomethane

1.0 U 0.311.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Dichlorodifluoromethane

1.0 U 0.171.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Ethylbenzene

1.0 U 0.241.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Ethylene Dibromide

1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Isopropylbenzene

10 U 0.3810 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Methyl acetate

1.0 U 0.171.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Methyl tert-butyl ether

1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Methylcyclohexane

0.374 J 0.331.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Methylene Chloride

1.0 U 0.111.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Styrene

1.0 U 0.291.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Tetrachloroethene

1.0 U 0.131.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Toluene

1.0 U 0.191.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene

1.0 U 0.191.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

1.0 U 0.171.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Trichloroethene

1.0 U 0.211.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Trichlorofluoromethane

1.0 U 0.221.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Vinyl chloride

2.0 U 0.142.0 ug/L 04/09/14 01:04 1Xylenes, Total

TestAmerica Canton

Page 34 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14








MB MB




88 04/09/14 01:04 1Toluene-d8 (Surr) 74 - 120





Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 10.0 11.4 ug/L 114 68 - 120


ne

10.0 9.74 ug/L 97 74 - 151



1,1-Dichloroethene 10.0 10.7 ug/L 107 78 - 131

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10.0 9.40 ug/L 94 48 - 135

1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 10.0 10.3 ug/L 103 42 - 136



1,2-Dichloropropane 10.0 10.8 ug/L 108 80 - 120



2-Butanone (MEK) 20.0 25.4 * ug/L 127 60 - 126

2-Hexanone 20.0 25.6 ug/L 128 55 - 133

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 20.0 25.1 ug/L 125 63 - 128

Acetone 20.0 24.6 ug/L 123 43 - 136

Benzene 10.0 10.0 ug/L 100 80 - 120

Bromoform 10.0 9.81 ug/L 98 40 - 131

Bromomethane 10.0 7.26 ug/L 73 11 - 185

Carbon disulfide 10.0 11.5 ug/L 115 62 - 142

Carbon tetrachloride 10.0 9.71 ug/L 97 66 - 128

Chlorobenzene 10.0 9.85 ug/L 98 80 - 120

Chloroethane 10.0 9.48 ug/L 95 25 - 153

Chloroform 10.0 10.0 ug/L 100 79 - 120

Chloromethane 10.0 9.22 ug/L 92 44 - 126

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 10.0 9.94 ug/L 99 80 - 120

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10.0 11.0 ug/L 110 61 - 120

Cyclohexane 10.0 11.0 ug/L 110 54 - 121

Dichlorobromomethane 10.0 10.2 ug/L 102 72 - 121

Dichlorodifluoromethane 10.0 6.24 ug/L 62 19 - 129

Ethylbenzene 10.0 10.2 ug/L 102 80 - 120

Ethylene Dibromide 10.0 11.0 ug/L 110 79 - 120

Isopropylbenzene 10.0 10.1 ug/L 101 75 - 120

Methyl acetate 50.0 58.2 ug/L 116 58 - 131

Methyl tert-butyl ether 10.0 10.8 ug/L 108 52 - 144

Methylcyclohexane 10.0 9.75 ug/L 97 56 - 127

TestAmerica Canton

Page 35 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







Methylene Chloride 10.0 10.4 ug/L 104 66 - 131

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

m-Xylene & p-Xylene 10.0 10.0 ug/L 100 80 - 120

o-Xylene 10.0 10.2 ug/L 102 80 - 120

Styrene 10.0 10.2 ug/L 102 79 - 120

Tetrachloroethene 10.0 9.63 ug/L 96 79 - 120

Toluene 10.0 10.7 ug/L 107 80 - 120

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 10.0 10.3 ug/L 103 80 - 120

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10.0 11.2 ug/L 112 58 - 120

Trichloroethene 10.0 9.70 ug/L 97 76 - 120

Trichlorofluoromethane 10.0 7.89 ug/L 79 49 - 157

Vinyl chloride 10.0 8.75 ug/L 88 53 - 127

Xylenes, Total 20.0 20.2 ug/L 101 80 - 120


Surrogate

84

LCS LCS







Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total Recoverable


RL MDL

Aluminum 200 U 200 97 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1

MB MB


10 U 2.110 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Antimony

10 U 3.210 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Arsenic

1.48 J 0.67200 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Barium

5.0 U 0.465.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Beryllium

2.0 U 0.662.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Cadmium

332 J 1305000 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Calcium

5.0 U 2.25.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Chromium

7.0 U 1.77.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Cobalt

25 U 4.525 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Copper

100 U 81100 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Iron

3.0 U 1.93.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Lead

5000 U 345000 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Magnesium

15 U 0.9615 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Manganese

40 U 3.240 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Nickel

5000 U 725000 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Potassium

5.0 U 4.15.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Selenium

5.0 U 2.25.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Silver

5000 U 5905000 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Sodium

10 U 4.710 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Thallium

7.0 U 2.47.0 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Vanadium

17.2 J 5.050 ug/L 04/02/14 07:49 04/03/14 11:57 1Zinc

TestAmerica Canton

Page 36 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total Recoverable


Aluminum 2000 1830 ug/L 91 80 - 120

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

Antimony 500 471 ug/L 94 80 - 120

Arsenic 2000 1830 ug/L 91 80 - 120

Barium 2000 1750 ug/L 87 80 - 120

Beryllium 50.0 43.4 ug/L 87 80 - 120

Cadmium 50.0 45.5 ug/L 91 80 - 120

Calcium 50000 46300 ug/L 93 80 - 120

Chromium 200 174 ug/L 87 80 - 120

Cobalt 500 446 ug/L 89 80 - 120

Copper 250 222 ug/L 89 80 - 120

Iron 1000 900 ug/L 90 80 - 120

Lead 500 445 ug/L 89 80 - 120

Magnesium 50000 45200 ug/L 90 80 - 120

Manganese 500 441 ug/L 88 80 - 120

Nickel 500 455 ug/L 91 80 - 120

Potassium 50000 49100 ug/L 98 80 - 120

Selenium 2000 1870 ug/L 94 80 - 120

Silver 50.0 47.0 ug/L 94 80 - 120

Sodium 50000 48800 ug/L 98 80 - 120

Thallium 2000 1750 ug/L 88 80 - 120

Vanadium 500 431 ug/L 86 80 - 120

Zinc 500 469 ug/L 94 80 - 120

Client Sample ID: BW4Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-7 MS

Matrix: Water Prep Type: Dissolved


Aluminum 200 U 2000 1880 ug/L 94 75 - 125

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

Antimony 10 U 500 501 ug/L 100 75 - 125

Arsenic 43 2000 2030 ug/L 100 75 - 125

Barium 210 B 2000 2020 ug/L 90 75 - 125

Beryllium 5.0 U 50.0 44.6 ug/L 89 75 - 125

Cadmium 2.0 U 50.0 49.1 ug/L 98 75 - 125

Calcium 160000 B 50000 216000 ug/L 101 75 - 125

Chromium 5.0 U 200 182 ug/L 91 75 - 125

Cobalt 3.7 J 500 490 ug/L 97 75 - 125

Copper 25 U 250 234 ug/L 94 75 - 125

Iron 5100 1000 6010 4 ug/L 90 75 - 125

Lead 3.0 U 500 465 ug/L 93 75 - 125

Magnesium 23000 50000 70500 ug/L 95 75 - 125

Manganese 1100 500 1570 ug/L 101 75 - 125

Nickel 9.4 J 500 505 ug/L 99 75 - 125

Potassium 8700 50000 61400 ug/L 105 75 - 125

Selenium 4.9 J 2000 1990 ug/L 99 75 - 125

Silver 5.0 U 50.0 50.5 ug/L 101 75 - 125

Sodium 62000 50000 114000 ug/L 104 75 - 125

Thallium 10 U 2000 1830 ug/L 92 75 - 125

TestAmerica Canton

Page 37 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







Vanadium 7.0 U 500 436 ug/L 87 75 - 125

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

Zinc 130 B 500 690 ug/L 111 75 - 125

Client Sample ID: BW4Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-7 MSD



Aluminum 200 U 2000 1960 ug/L 98 75 - 125 4 20

Analyte

MSD MSD


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

Antimony 10 U 500 504 ug/L 101 75 - 125 1 20

Arsenic 43 2000 2030 ug/L 99 75 - 125 0 20

Barium 210 B 2000 2120 ug/L 95 75 - 125 5 20

Beryllium 5.0 U 50.0 46.8 ug/L 94 75 - 125 5 20

Cadmium 2.0 U 50.0 49.0 ug/L 98 75 - 125 0 20

Calcium 160000 B 50000 230000 F1 ug/L 130 75 - 125 6 20

Chromium 5.0 U 200 187 ug/L 94 75 - 125 3 20

Cobalt 3.7 J 500 487 ug/L 97 75 - 125 1 20

Copper 25 U 250 242 ug/L 97 75 - 125 3 20

Iron 5100 1000 6500 4 ug/L 140 75 - 125 8 20

Lead 3.0 U 500 460 ug/L 92 75 - 125 1 20

Magnesium 23000 50000 74100 ug/L 102 75 - 125 5 20

Manganese 1100 500 1660 ug/L 119 75 - 125 6 20

Nickel 9.4 J 500 502 ug/L 99 75 - 125 1 20

Potassium 8700 50000 64100 ug/L 111 75 - 125 4 20

Selenium 4.9 J 2000 1990 ug/L 99 75 - 125 0 20

Silver 5.0 U 50.0 51.6 ug/L 103 75 - 125 2 20

Sodium 62000 50000 121000 ug/L 118 75 - 125 6 20

Thallium 10 U 2000 1830 ug/L 91 75 - 125 0 20

Vanadium 7.0 U 500 456 ug/L 91 75 - 125 4 20

Zinc 130 B 500 685 ug/L 110 75 - 125 1 20





RL MDL

Mercury 0.20 U 0.20 0.12 ug/L 04/02/14 13:00 04/03/14 11:45 1

MB MB





Mercury 5.00 4.68 ug/L 94 81 - 123

Analyte

LCS LCS


Spike

Added

%Rec.

Limits

TestAmerica Canton

Page 38 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) (Continued)




Mercury 0.20 U 1.00 0.960 ug/L 96 69 - 134

Analyte

MS MS


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits

Client Sample ID: BW4Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-7 MSD



Mercury 0.20 U 1.00 0.955 ug/L 96 69 - 134 0 20

Analyte

MSD MSD


Spike

Added

Sample

Result

Sample

Qualifier

%Rec.

Limits LimitRPD

RPD

TestAmerica Canton

Page 39 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



GC/MS VOA

Prep Batch: 124981


Solid 5035240-35621-1 BW7A 2-4 Total/NA






Solid 8260B 124981240-35621-1 BW7A 2-4 Total/NA








Water 8260B240-35621-5 BW4 Total/NA

Water 8260B240-35621-6 BW1 Total/NA

Water 8260BLCS 240-125462/4 Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Water 8260BMB 240-125462/5 Method Blank Total/NA



Water 8260B240-35621-8 TRIP BLANK Total/NA

Water 8260BLCS 240-125725/4 Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Water 8260BMB 240-125725/6 Method Blank Total/NA

Metals

Prep Batch: 124891


Water 3005A240-35621-5 BW4 Total Recoverable

Water 3005A240-35621-6 BW1 Dissolved

Water 3005A240-35621-6 BW1 Total Recoverable


Water 3005A240-35621-7 MS BW4 Dissolved

Water 3005A240-35621-7 MSD BW4 Dissolved

Water 3005ALCS 240-124891/2-A Lab Control Sample Total Recoverable

Water 3005AMB 240-124891/1-A Method Blank Total Recoverable

Prep Batch: 124892


Water 7470A240-35621-5 BW4 Total/NA


Water 7470A240-35621-6 BW1 Total/NA


Water 7470A240-35621-7 MS BW4 Dissolved

Water 7470A240-35621-7 MSD BW4 Dissolved

Water 7470ALCS 240-124892/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Water 7470AMB 240-124892/1-A Method Blank Total/NA

TestAmerica Canton

Page 40 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Metals (Continued)



Water 6010B 124891240-35621-5 BW4 Total Recoverable


Water 6010B 124891240-35621-6 BW1 Dissolved



Water 6010B 124891240-35621-7 BW4 Dissolved

Water 6010B 124891240-35621-7 MS BW4 Dissolved

Water 6010B 124891240-35621-7 MSD BW4 Dissolved

Water 6010B 124891LCS 240-124891/2-A Lab Control Sample Total Recoverable

Water 6010B 124891MB 240-124891/1-A Method Blank Total Recoverable



Water 7470A 124892240-35621-5 BW4 Total/NA

Water 7470A 124892240-35621-6 BW1 Dissolved

Water 7470A 124892240-35621-6 BW1 Total/NA

Water 7470A 124892240-35621-7 BW4 Dissolved

Water 7470A 124892240-35621-7 MS BW4 Dissolved

Water 7470A 124892240-35621-7 MSD BW4 Dissolved

Water 7470A 124892LCS 240-124892/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA

Water 7470A 124892MB 240-124892/1-A Method Blank Total/NA

General Chemistry



Solid Moisture240-35621-1 BW7A 2-4 Total/NA


Solid Moisture240-35621-2 DU BW8A 4-6 Total/NA



TestAmerica Canton

Page 41 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14



Client Sample ID: BW7A 2-4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-1Matrix: SolidDate Collected: 03/31/14 07:20


Prep 5035 04/01/14 17:00 LAM124981 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA





Prep 5035 04/01/14 17:00 LAM124981 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA





Prep 5035 04/01/14 17:00 LAM124981 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA





Prep 5035 04/01/14 17:00 LAM124981 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA



Client Sample ID: BW4 Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-5Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 09:30


Analysis 8260B 04/07/14 17:34 LEE1 125462 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA

Prep 3005A 124891 04/02/14 07:49 LPM TAL CANTotal Recoverable

Analysis 6010B 1 125100 04/03/14 12:01 KLC TAL CANTotal Recoverable



Prep 7470A 124892 04/02/14 13:00 LPM TAL CANTotal/NA

TestAmerica Canton

Page 42 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14





Analysis 7470A 04/03/14 13:12 AMM22 125190 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA



Analysis 8260B 04/07/14 17:56 LEE1 125462 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA

Prep 3005A 124891 04/02/14 07:49 LPM TAL CANDissolved

Analysis 6010B 1 125100 04/03/14 12:17 KLC TAL CANDissolved






Analysis 7470A 1 125190 04/03/14 11:59 AMM2 TAL CANDissolved

Prep 7470A 124892 04/02/14 13:00 LPM TAL CANTotal/NA




Prep 3005A 04/02/14 07:49 LPM124891 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Dissolved

Analysis 6010B 1 125100 04/03/14 11:29 KLC TAL CANDissolved


Analysis 7470A 1 125190 04/03/14 11:49 AMM2 TAL CANDissolved

Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANK Lab Sample ID: 240-35621-8Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 03/31/14 00:00


Analysis 8260B 04/09/14 01:26 LRW1 125725 TAL CAN

Type

Batch Batch


Prepared

or Analyzed

Batch

Number

Dilution

Factor

Total/NA



TestAmerica Canton

Page 43 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14







Florida NELAP 4 E87225 06-30-14 *

Georgia State Program 4 N/A 06-30-14 *


Kansas NELAP 7 E-10336 03-31-14 *

Kentucky (UST) State Program 4 58 06-30-14 *

L-A-B DoD ELAP L2315 07-18-16

Minnesota NELAP 5 039-999-348 12-31-14


New Jersey NELAP 2 OH001 06-30-14 *

New York NELAP 2 10975 03-31-14 *




USDA Federal P330-13-00319 11-26-16





TestAmerica Canton


Page 44 of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

of 48 4/14/2014

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Appendix J

Statistical summary and UCL calculations

for inorganic chemicals of concern for


Appendix K


for organic chemicals of concern for


Appendix L


for inorganic chemicals of concern

for inhalation exposure (0-12 feet)

Appendix M


for organic chemicals of concern for


Appendix N

Outputs from the Johnson and Ettinger Model

used to evaluate risks posed by volatile

compounds in indoor air

Acenaphthene - residential proposed jail

RISK-BASED SOIL CONCENTRATION CALCULATIONS: INCREMENTAL RISK CALCULATIONS:

Incremental Hazard

Indoor Indoor Risk-based Final risk from quotient

exposure exposure indoor Soil indoor vapor from vapor

soil soil exposure saturation exposure intrusion to intrusion to

conc., conc., soil conc., soil indoor air, indoor air,

carcinogen noncarcinogen conc., Csat conc., carcinogen noncarcinogen

(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (unitless) (unitless)

NA NA NA 50719.7707 NA NA 9.48E-05

MESSAGE AND ERROR SUMMARY BELOW: (DO NOT USE RESULTS IF ERRORS ARE PRESENT)

MESSAGE: Risk/HQ or risk-based soil concentration is based on a route-to-route extrapolation.

Acenaphthene - residential proposed jail and expansion


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 50719.7707 NA NA 7.97E-05



Acenaphthene - worker proposed jail


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 50719.7707 NA NA 6.49E-05



Acenaphthene - worker proposed jail and expansion


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 50719.7707 NA NA 5.46E-05



Acenaphthene - worker Sheriffs Office


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 50719.7707 NA NA 1.69E-04



Benzo(b)fluoranthene- residential proposed jail


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 3690.070511 NA 3.15259E-11 NA



Benzo(b)fluoranthene- residential proposed jail and expansion


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 3690.070511 NA 2.65125E-11 NA



Benzo(b)fluoranthene- worker proposed jail


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 3690.070511 NA 5.39827E-10 NA



Benzo(b)fluoranthene- worker proposed jail and expansion


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 3690.070511 NA 4.53982E-10 NA



Benzo(b)fluoranthene- worker Sheriffs Office


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 3690.070511 NA 1.40715E-09 NA



Chrysene - residential proposed jail


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 5015.096113 NA 1.24824E-12 NA



Chrysene - residential proposed jail and expansion


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 5015.096113 NA 1.0497E-12 NA



Chrysene - worker proposed jail


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 5015.096113 NA 2.1374E-11 NA



Chrysene - worker proposed jail and expansion


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 5015.096113 NA 1.79743E-11 NA



Chrysene - worker Sheriffs Office


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 5015.096113 NA 5.5723E-11 NA



Fluorene - residential proposed jail


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 54741.13428 NA NA 1.05E-04



Fluorene - residential proposed jail and expansion


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 54741.13428 NA NA 8.84E-05



Fluorene - worker proposed jail


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 54741.13428 NA NA 7.20E-05



Fluorene - worker proposed jail and expansion


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 54741.13428 NA NA 6.05E-05



Fluorene - worker Sheriffs Office


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 54741.13428 NA NA 1.88E-04



Mercury- residential proposed jail


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 1041393.209 NA NA 3.66E+00


Mercury- residential proposed jail and expansion


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 1041393.209 NA NA 3.08E+00


Mercury- worker proposed jail


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 1041393.209 NA NA 2.51E+00


Mercury- worker proposed jail and expansion


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 1041393.209 NA NA 2.11E+00


Mercury- worker Sheriff's office


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 1041393.209 NA NA 6.53E+00


Naphthalene- residential proposed jail


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 125493.5915 NA NA 6.61E-02


Naphthalene- residential proposed jail and expansion


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 125493.5915 NA NA 5.56E-02


Naphthalene- worker proposed jail


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 125493.5915 NA NA 4.53E-02


Naphthalene- worker proposed jail and expansion


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 125493.5915 NA NA 3.81E-02


Naphthalene- worker Sheriffs Office


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 125493.5915 NA NA 1.18E-01


Pyrene - residential proposed jail


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 283563.3527 NA NA 1.39E-05



Pyrene - residential proposed jail and expansion


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 283558.5244 NA NA 1.19E-05



Pyrene - worker proposed jail


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 283563.3527 NA NA 9.51E-06



Pyrene - worker proposed jail and expansion


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 283563.3527 NA NA 7.99E-06



Pyrene - worker Sheriffs Office


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 283563.3527 NA NA 2.48E-05



2-Methylnaphthalene-resident proposed jail


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 139524.4131 NA NA 4.72E-05



2-Methylnaphthalene-resident proposed jail and expansion


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 139524.4131 NA NA 3.97E-05



2-Methylnaphthalene-worker proposed jail


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 139524.4131 NA NA 3.23E-05



2-Methylnaphthalene-worker proposed jail and expansion


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 139524.4131 NA NA 2.72E-05



2-Methylnaphthalene-worker Sheriff's office


Incremental Hazard







NA NA NA 139524.4131 NA NA 8.43E-05


Appendix O


for lead (0-8 feet)