report on geological amd geophysical surveb for …

26
o 4 REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for MOTION Marshsil J-pi INTRODUCTION 41P03NW8016 2 .737 M ARSHAY 010 Matron Exploration Limited holds under opvum claims nurtured 322999 to 323001 inclusive and 323332 to 323331* inclusive situated in tits northwest corner of Marshay Twp., Sudbury Mining District, Ontario* Aa additional six, adjacent and contiguous unpatented mining claim* numbered 317376 to 33.7381 inclusive are owned by Matron. Aooess to the property Is available by C.N.R. which Iles at the east boundary of the property at a point UB idles north of Sudbury, Out* The property can also be readied by a good lumber road leading south fro* Shiningtree, Ontario, for a distance of \ 6 ndles. Hap references of this area include O.D.M. Map P 300, Westree Sheet, which shows this area as undifferentiated silicic Intrusive rooks of Algoman age, and Aeromagnetic Map ll&l O, which features a N 1^*W magnetic trend traversing the property which probably represents a diabase dike* A search of the assessment files at Sudbury produced meagre information* SURVEY METHODS A systematic grid of lines was out from an east-west base line centrally located on the property* North-south picket lines were cut at IjQO* Intervals with sons additional lines at 200* Intervals In the central part of the property* total mileage of the system was 10.67 miles* Claim 323001 was excluded from the surveys* The grid system was used to conduct a magnetometer survey using a Sharpe HP - l fluxgate instrument* A VU? - KM survey was conducted using a Ronka KM 16 instrument and Cutler, Maine as the transmitting source. An Induced Polarisation survey was conducted by Seigel Associates Ltd. under contract and the results of this survey appear in another report. The property was geologically napped by the writer of this report. AU of this work was carried out during Sspteitoer and October, 1971* THEORY OF THE EM SURVEY METHOD aajment is sinply a sensatlve receiver unit which detects radio 7 Ions operating for ooraaunioations with submarines these stations In the world end the selection of the one to use depends upon its orientation* The direction to the station that is most closely aligned to the general trend of the country rocks Is usually the factor considered. The stations have vertical antenna and as a result trsiusdt a concentric field around them. Any conductive body lying In this field will create a secondary field* The receiver unit contains a crystal of the saws frequency as the transmitting source and a means of measuring the vertical field components. It has two Inputs with two receiving coils built into the instrument. One coil has a normally vertical axis and the other is horizontal.

Upload: others

Post on 28-Feb-2022

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

o

4 REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB

for MOTION

Marshsil J-pi

INTRODUCTION41P03NW8016 2 .737 MARSHAY 010

Matron Exploration Limited holds under opvum claims nurtured 322999 to 323001 inclusive and 323332 to 323331* inclusive situated in tits northwest corner of Marshay Twp., Sudbury Mining District, Ontario* Aa additional six, adjacent and contiguous unpatented mining claim* numbered 317376 to 33.7381 inclusive are owned by Matron.

Aooess to the property Is available by C.N.R. which Iles at the east boundary of the property at a point UB idles north of Sudbury, Out* The property can also be readied by a good lumber road leading south fro* Shiningtree, Ontario, for a distance of \6 ndles.

Hap references of this area include O.D.M. Map P 300, Westree Sheet, which shows this area as undifferentiated silicic Intrusive rooks of Algoman age, and Aeromagnetic Map ll&l O, which features a N 1^*W magnetic trend traversing the property which probably represents a diabase dike* A search of the assessment files at Sudbury produced meagre information*

SURVEY METHODS

A systematic grid of lines was out from an east-west base line centrally located on the property* North-south picket lines were cut at IjQO* Intervals with sons additional lines at 200* Intervals In the central part of the property* total mileage of the system was 10.67 miles* Claim 323001 was excluded from the surveys*

The grid system was used to conduct a magnetometer survey using a Sharpe HP - l fluxgate instrument* A VU? - KM survey was conducted using a Ronka KM 16 instrument and Cutler, Maine as the transmitting source. An Induced Polarisation survey was conducted by Seigel Associates Ltd. under contract and the results of this survey appear in another report. The property was geologically napped by the writer of this report. AU of this work was carried out during Sspteitoer and October, 1971*

THEORY OF THE EM SURVEY METHOD

aajment is sinply a sensatlve receiver unit which detects radio

7 Ions operating for ooraaunioations with submarines

these stations In the world end the selection of the one touse depends upon its orientation* The direction to the station that is most closely aligned to the general trend of the country rocks Is usually the factor considered. The stations have vertical antenna and as a result trsiusdt a concentric field around them. Any conductive body lying In this field will create a secondary field*

The receiver unit contains a crystal of the saws frequency as the transmitting source and a means of measuring the vertical field components. It has two Inputs with two receiving coils built into the instrument. One coil has a normally vertical axis and the other is horizontal.

Page 2: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

t The signal from one of the coils (vertical axis) is first ndniffdsed lay tilting the coil* The tilt-angle is calibrated in percentages and degrees* The remaining signal in this coil is finally balanced out by a measured percentage of a signal from the other coil, after being shifted by 900* The axis of this coil is at right angles to the axis of the first coil* This coil is kept normally parallel to the primary field*

Thus, if the secondary signals are small ooBpared to the primary horizontal field, the mechanical tilt-angle is an accurate measurement of the Yertical real-ooraponenl and the compensation i r/2 - signal from the horizontal coil is a measurement of the quadrature vertical signal*

RESULTS OF THE SUHVETS

The property is approximately 85/5 covered by overburden* The rocks observed consist mainly of granodiorite intruded by east-nest and north-south trending diabase dikes* Hear the north boundary of the property and centrally located are two narrow altered basic rocks termed as diorite* They trend east-vest and dip -k5o south and are sheard along strike and contain minor pyrite* A grab sample of this material assayed tr* Au, O.Ob Ag, 0.0# Ou, 0*01? ft. (Une O, 1100* H).

In the central part of the property old pits were located union contained illite quarts stringers and veins which -were barren of metallic mintxals. At this location the garnodiorite was homogeneously peppered with chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite up to 1/8" size. A grab sample of this material assayed 1.3&C Cu, 0*02* Ml* This is situated in a low swarapy area* (line 8 W, 1000' S)* (

On Jim O, 1800* S, rusty sheared basic rooks contain minor pyrite and is likely a contact zone of a diabase dike*

The results of the magnetic survey confirmed the presence of diabase dikes and outlined other possible dikes* No magnetic indications wtre obsefved over the pits containing pyrrhotite, and no other special features were observed*

The results of the VLF * EM survey showed only one minor valid conductor located on the north end of lines O, IjB, 88, and near the pyriUetd diorite band* The disturbance along the creek in the central part of property is due to overburdenaffects* i

j SUMMAfff AMD CONCLUSIONS !

i

Material from the pits located in the central part of the property was significantly interesting for copper possibilities* The nature of the mineralisation is such that Induced Polarisation methods should detect it* Ho particular features were j outlined using magnatonster and VII1 ** EM methods* ;

Respectfully submitted,

New liskeard, Qnt. NOV. U,1071. J.o*tfillart B.A,Sc7|P.Bng,

~t^--

Page 3: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

.CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that i

1. l an a graduate in Mining Geology from the University of Toronto in 1951* and Z hold the degree of Bachelor of Applied Science and I have been practising ay profession continuously for the past twenty years*

2* I aa a member in good standing of fhe Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario* and I reside and hold office at 12? Lakeshore Road, New Liskeard, Ontario*

3. tfy report is based on personal supervision of the field work during the nonths of Septesfoar and October, 1971, and personal examination of the geology of the property and of the results of the investigations*

Signed i

New liskeard, Pnt. Nor* Iijl971,

Page 4: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

DEC 2 s

41P03NW0016 2 .737 MARSHAY 020

rREPORT ON

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY MARSHAY TWP. ONTARIO

ON BEHALF OF METRON EXPLORATION LIMITED

L .J

by

James M. Haynes, B. Se. ,D.I. C. , Geophysicist

Jan Klein, M.Se., P. Eng. , Geophysicist

TORONTO, Ontario October, 1971

Page 5: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

SUMMARY

The induced polarization survey carried out in the Marshay Twp.

grid has revealed one anomalous zone of up to at least 1600 feet in length

but open to both sides. This zone (marked C) might reflect l^o sulphides

by volume .

It is recommended that detailed geological mapping and sampling

be executed prior to drilling of this zone.

Page 6: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

REPORT ON INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY Marshay Twp. Ontario

on Behalf of METRON EXPLORATION LIMITED

INTRODUCTIONtt

Between September 21st and October 3rd, 1971. an induced polarization

survey was conducted on a property in Marshay Twp. , northern Ontario,

under the direction of Mr. J.M. Haynes, B.Se. D.I. C., of Seigel Associates

Limited on behalf of Metrori Exploration Limited.

The property, comprised of claims 317376, 317377, 317378, 317379,

317380, 317381, 323000, 323001, 323322, 323333, 323334, 323999 is located

approximately 68 miles north of Sudbury adjacent to the C.N.R. main line

and 2 miles west of Shoofly Lake. Access was by vehicle from New Liskeard

and by a logging road to the old Lapalmes Spur. A location map is included

on Plate l . The survey was completed over a precut grid consisting of 20

north-south traverse lines. The sections surveyed on each line are indicated

on Plate 1. A total of approximately 8.0 line miles of profiles were obtained.

The three electrode array configuration was used throughout the survey,

employing a 200' electrode spacing, and traverse lines were run north and

south from the base line. On all lines the current electrode followed the

potential electrodes although on sections north of the base line, the current

electrode was to the south of the potential electrodes and on sections south of

the base line the current electrode was placed north of the potential electrodes

j The western half of the grid was completed first with the "infinite" current

Page 7: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

5M--

4M--

MARSHAY

M. 855

FIGURE

LOCATION MAP

METRON EXPLORATION LIMITED

MARSHAY TOWNSHIP , ONTARIO

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY

SCALE : r a 1/2 MILE

4IP3 71-9507

Page 8: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

electrode placed at 10E on the base line. Since transmitter current was low

(but sufficient, averaging about 0.3 amperes), the "infinite" was moved to 2E

when line 10W was completed. On the eastern half of the grid the "infinite"

was placed at 10W until line 12E was completed and was then shifted to line

2W. At all times the "infinite 1 ! was greater than 5a away from the traverse

lines being surveyed ("a" being the separation distance between line electrodes,

a ^ 2 00').

The purpose of this survey was to detect and map the distribution of

subsurface metallic mineralization, in particular cupriferous sulphides, which

may exist in the vicinity of the lines traversed.

The survey was performed with a Scjntrea^Mark VII time dgmain

(pulse type) induced polarization unit. This equipment consists of a Newmont

type remotely triggered receiver and a 2. 5 k W transmitter operating with a

current-on time of two seconds and current-off time of two seconds. The

system measures the apparent resistivity of the ground in ohm-meters and

two parameters of the overvoltage pulse shape. The chargeability, M,

measured in milliseconds, is the normalized integral of the transient voltage

between 0.45 seconds and 1.1 seconds after current cut-off. The 0.45

second delay time allows most electromagnetic induction transients, switch

ing transients and interline coupling effects to disappear before measurements

i* are made. The area over the transient curve, taking as a reference the

transient voltage at 0.45 seconds after current cut-off, is also measured.

This measurement is made during the. period 0. 45 seconds to 1.75 seconds

after current cut-off and is expressed as the quantity, L. Like M, L is

Page 9: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

measured directly in milliseconds at the receiver. A number of consecutive

integrations of both L and M are measured and the average values used so as

to reduce telluric noise effects and other interference.

The ratio L/M may be considered a sensitive indication of the transient

curve shape. It has been well established that the L/M ratios measured in

areas of no metallic mineralization are constant within better than 20^o.

Significant departures from this range usually imply an abnormal condition,

either an anomalous metallic polarization response, or significant electro

magnetic or interline coupling.

For further references on the Induced Polarization technique and case

histories, refer to the attached copies of articles by Dr. H.O. Seigel

entitled: "Some Comparative Geophysical Case Histories of Base Metal

Discoveries" and "The Induced Polarization Method".

GEOLOGY

The geology of the project area is not known in detail at the time of

writing this report. Regionally, however, the area i s underlain by early

Precambrian undifferentiated felsic intrusives as illustrated by the Sudbury-

Cobalt, Geological Compilation Series Sheet #2188. Unfortunately even this

regional geology sheet is very limited in the Marshay Twp. area, although

one geological lineation is postulated striking Nl 5OW through the project area.

This lineation is further borne out by the aero magnetic sheet, as a 300 gamm

anomaly is present on the property in an area otherwise quite magnetically

flat. This anomaly may be due to a diabase dike, as indications of this have

Page 10: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

been noted within the survey grid while the survey was being executed.

The regional aero magnetics seem to reflect felsic intrusives in the west, in

which the magnetic anomaly is an outstanding feature, and a complex of

sediments, metamorphics and mafics in the east. The contact of these two

areas strikes approximately N30 W. Within the project area, several shallow

pits have been dug in the past; although one located on line 8W about station

10S is of particular interest. One sample taken from this pit shows cupri

ferous sulphides containing chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite in a quartz-monzonite

host rock,

PRESENTATION OF DATA

Plate l shows the results of the three electrode array profiles on a

scale of l" = 200' and contours on a scale of l" = 400'. The contour interval

is one millisecond. Apparent resistivity, chargeability and the L/M ratio

are shown for each line. The chargeability results are plotted on a vertical

scale of l " ^ 5 milliseconds and resistivity values are plotted on a logarithmic

scale for which 1. 33" = a factor of 10. The datum level is 1000 ohm-meters

except for lines indicated otherwise. The L/M ratio is plotted on a vertical

scale of l" s l unit.v

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

By virtue of the fact that the property was surveyed from the base line

and due to the positioning of the current electrode on lines running both north

and south of the base line, station O was read twice. In some cases a dif

ference between these two readings can be noted, but no appreciable change

Page 11: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

of curve shape results. (This discrepency for station O has no bearing on

the results of the entire north south sections as a whole. )

From the chargeability contour plan the property may be divided

roughly into at least three zones. Zone C in the south comprises a high on

lines 20W to 0+00, south of sta.tion 14S. Zone B comprises two blocks, the

western one approximately bordered by lines 24W and 10W and stations 0+00

and 14S, the eastern block by lines 4W and l 2E and again stations 0+00 and

14S. The remainder of the grid can be identified as Zone A.

The resistivity of the project area on the whole is high, averaging

approximately 10,000 ohmmeters ranging between extremes of 300 to

100,000 ohmmeters. On all profile lines the chargeability curves follow the

resistivity curves (high chargeability, high resistivity). This is an excellent

indication that the three electrode array separation of ZOO 1 was successful in

giving responses indicative of basement rock material. The depth of pene

tration for this survey is therefore believed to be quite adequate.

Zone B is a complex zone, and is fairly indicative of background charge

ability levels, 4-6 milliseconds. An area running in the vicinity of lines 6W

and 8W is well below these levels but probably reflects deeper overburden and

marshy conditions. This depression divides Zone B in an east and west

portion. A small anomaly about 2 milliseconds above background is present

in the area of L8E station 4S. No steep chargeability gradients are present

in this zone. The resistivity profiles show no significant increases in bedrock

conductivity and are generally above 10,000 ohmmeters. Lines 6W and 8W are

the two exceptions with resistivity values much lower, averaging about 5000

Page 12: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

f b

4 ohmmeters, A pit on line 8W near station 1 45 c ontaining mineralized rock

specimens is in a region of low resistivity and chargeability. Tests com

pleted on a mineralized sample taken from this pit indicated extremely high

chargeability readings and extreme conductivity. Although these tests are

not representative of results that would be expected from the same in situ#

deposits, they were high enough to show that any sulphides if in quantity

would certainly have given verifiable anomalous results.

Zone A is characterised by low chargeability values (below background

level). No steep gradients are present on the contour plan, and the zone is

relatively flat. Resistivity values from the profiles are fairly stable, with

no significant drops in value on any traverse line to warrant interest with

regards to subsurface sulphides. A gradual decrease in chargeability and

resistivity values can be observed in an easterly direction towards Poukiz

Lake. Coupled with this are contour depressions on lines 8W and 4E and i/

areas adjacent to the lake. This may possibly reflect a deepening of over

burden sediments towards the lake and in the region of creeks which flow

through the marshy ground situated in this zone. The L/M ratios are fairly

normal but for slight changes at 6N on lines 8W, (HOO,4E and 8E, also at 8N

on line 12E. This situation is indicative of a short time constant in the

transient decay curve and may be c ased by positive E.M. effects or small

particle size. The latter reason is more probably the cause, due to the fine

marsh deposits.

Zone C is an east-west striking linear high. This zone is at least 1000

feet long, but open to both sides. This zone displays above background charge-

Page 13: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

T r

abilities as high as 7 milliseconds. Sharp gradients are illustrated by the

contour plan. Again resistivity values increase where chargeability increases.

Resistivities in the zone are generally well above 10,000 ohmmeters. If

mineralization of a massive nature were present in quantity, the situation

should be reflected most likely, by a resistivity depression. The anomalous

chargeability values possibly reflect a change in rock type from area B, but

does not exclude the possibility of sulphide mineralization (up to l "?o by volume),

A single station anomaly at L4W station ION should bft mentioned without

further evaluation. 7

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The survey area can be divided into two main areas. The first area

north ol station 14S comprises Zones A and B. Both are suggested to be

underlain by -the same rock type with a chargeability level of 4-6 milliseconds

and apparent resistivities between 20,000 and 50,000 ohmmeters. Minor

anomalies (L4W station ION; L8E station 2S) can be caused by small uneco

nomic amounts of sulphides. Zone B represents areas with a thin cover of

overburden while Zone A more or less coincides with the topographically

lower parts of.the area. It is, in other words, underlain by increasing

amounts of overburden and swamp cover, reducing the bedrock response.

The areas near old prospecting pits did not give anomalous responses, sug

gesting that the amount of sulphides must be of a very localised nature.

The chargeabilities in Zone C are generally well above the background

values of Zones A and B, reflecting an anomaly striking approximately east-

Page 14: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

west across lines 16W to 4W about station 18S, It is recommended that

detailed geologic work be done over this zone which might contain up to l^o

sulphides by volume, and possibly trenching with samples being taken for

assey. No drill sites can be recommended at this time on the geophysical

data alone. Future recommendations are dependent on the results of them

sampling and geologic programs.

Respectfully submitted,

James M. Haynes, B.Se. , D.I. C. , Geophysicist.

Jan KleiA, T^.Sc. , P. Eng. , GeophysAcisl

Page 15: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

41P03NW8816 2 .727 MARSHAY

GEOPHYSICAL —TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

300

KtCEIVED

OFFICE USE ONLY |

TOPE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT l FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT 1 1 PROJECTS

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC. J SECTION

Type of Snrvpy }hduced Polarization'* ,. ' Marshay Twp.. Sudbury lining Divtsion t

Tnwnship nr Are* ' ^

Claim hoMer(s) ^QtrOP Exploration Limited te^f2302 - liOl fey St. Xronto, Qnt. .

Anthnrnf ttepnrt J.M.H4ynefi fi J. Klein (SeintwMr). ,, '222 Snidercroft Rd* Concord, Qnt*AHHress ' * ?

rnyerjng n^ff? "f s^r-yey 3ftpt. 21 — oct. 3 j 1971*(linccutting to office)

Total Miles of Line nit ,, ...., 10*6?

SPECIAL PROVISION? r^vs ! jSlCREDITS REQUESTED ^r^,^ pcrdaim

—F.WtrnmagnprirENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first Magnetometer ———————survey — RfHinmpTr"'' ™. , ———ENTER 20 days for each -Other I*P* ^ ,,,,additional survey using n^lngi^Isame grid. " . Gp^""npmira'. ,, ,,,,,,,, _ ,..,. ..— .....^ '

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

MagrtPt"mptpr ..Fl^tr"r"apnpt'f ,,,.. Rariiomfttrjr(enter days per claim)

PATF,: Dec.1^,1971* STHNFATIIRF.? \̂( ^4^^^^y' Author of Report " "*"*^

PROJECTS SECTIONRes C,pn\. SujotfMAflU Oiialifif-atinns \M^

Prfvi^MS Survpys f̂ ffj "

nhprkf-H hy Hatp

r.F.nT.nr,TrAT. HRANr.H

ApproyfH hy datp ——————— m

r.pnr nmr A T RR A wrn ,

Approved hv Aat~

" \ ; ~ - ' ' ' i. '

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

••••-''"r *MXlbiprtfix) ; -. -(ittiBiber) '

,. -V,,,. : r^^:^^^^;.,:/- . , ; .-^^•SpK^SMviw1 '^^--'-^'*'^f'|||'^'^"'^"'^i'^*'"'""/. " "••" : ' '.:-v ^iS'L-.^-r^';':^*'^^ .-. '-. - !

•:''\-; ; ^lAr: v---:. 3l73St...:,'. ; i i

^ L: i 322999 ;/;,.-.-: 1•-, - - - - - . - . - - ' f

V:^f.:': '\ : ;vt32W).-;^-'- |:--:-.y?i^,;^fe-;\- . . -1

"-1 .' si^-y^. sjj^ :". .-- r "."i. " '- - jJt Jjj5 33 """' . j . ". " i i*t•"t-~ •~- '-"^' - :" -V-'"". ™-*^ *^r ," " . ' S

1 ' ; -- i-iU'-"r i . ^' ;: - : . ; " -- ;. - : ' ,; " ; . i

,...- . .- -. . . - - i

' . , , - -t;: . .. ,, . ^ ,- - ,,-;.";- . . . ; -

'l 4 :

v; -S^ :;r-:5J : /-'. -.'... .-•..,- -- -.-'

TOT AI i:iCI',AlMf?' -- •"-" - - ^f 11" " :' r ; "

Page 16: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATAi \ ' "' ' - - -'

GROUND SURVEYS

Number of Stations__________——————;————Nnmh*r of 1'" ;r: :^Station interval________100'T . . , St 200' Line spacingProfile scale or Contour intervals____________B ?'*T! I*ftpoa*l

(ipecify for each typp of lurvey) MAGNETIC

Instrument.Accuracy -Scale constant— Diurnal correction method. Base station location———

ELECTROMAGNETIC

Instrument.Coil configuration. Coil separation^^Accuracy—^——..—Method: D Fixed transmitter C] Shoot back Q Inline : * C3 ParallellineFrequency^^———^^^^—f———^^^^.

(specify V.L.F. lUtlon)Parameters measured. GRAVITY

Instrument.Scale constant.

Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy—-—————^————————^———. INDUCED POLARIZATION -f RESISTIVITY

Instrument___________Scintrex Mark Vll

Time domain————————————————x———————— Frequency domain.Frequency___________________________ Range—m————~m Power—————————————————————g,g foy———————————————— -2LElectrode array.

spacing. Type of electrode,

Page 17: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

^fi1'-:".--;-

GEOPHYSICAL -'TECHNICAL DATA

: ,.'-*? -

stiips.2:-:iV';;:iS;t- h-itisr

TO JJE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT SE

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN tNTERPl

.,, ...,,.... ...-J, . . ,,,,,,^,.J ^J-^.-,itJi,.,.:I - T.,.,^^^y^gPJgg .,,

?|J35i^K6HflJ|

Type of Si.rvoy VU - EM| fS ̂ KEshi ̂ '"li^'f^l^^t^^^^Sl^^l^^ ̂ "* i";fi. : .-.: :-:,-i-.r-.::i ,.,.*'^^^^^-- .:^^^^^&^^^^:M:*..! -• f!^-, -t; -:--v . k r"- , i

Township or ArPa Marshay T|Hp. f Sudbury .iClaim h^lH <.r/c^ - Matron Exploration Mmitad- **OVJL wu. ***fcpj.vj. qrVj.yA^ *4x**ju. v^y^i ^,:JjT ;.lJA::ra!rif.T' j js''t

2302 - IjOj. Bay St., Toronto, 9e^^^^^^

J.Q.WLlLara feAuthor of ReportAddress____Stay 596 MHtf LISKEAJtD.

Covering Dates of Survey-

Total Miles of Line cut—

Sept.(linecutting to office)

10.67

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer--*—Radiometric———Other—————-

DAYSper claim

30 ii

Geological.Geochemical.

S* -r^.7; k:-7'

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision crediti do not apply to airborne lurveyi) S3.

Magnetometer. .Electroinagnetic. . Radiometric(enter day* per claim)

SIGNATURE:

PROJECTS SECTION Res. Geol.,.—-.....— Qualifications.Previous Surveys

Checked by. .date.

GEOLOGICAL BRANCH.

Approved by- .date.

GEOLOGICAL BRANCH.

Approved by. .date.

.''"

^^^•^Sfjy^jt^^n^j^^^^^tt^is^' Mi^f ":; ''^1^11^^5^^ife?^^ff f ̂ ^l^^tS^^1 " S^

' }k'"Lr!*i'^'3.fi:iaisqp*:S|S5:K?l*3SjsigSM - -*1 3^'- "*.*^-' ! rOKI 1111K H Kjntl' lit M limJwA^^ljiil 111 (J 111111111M111

^iW^roiii!*i^^ 4^^^^^^^^^'(^*^^ ?V.VVrO r - - 4'

.l!iW^lll^lg^f4M ' * "P-(

yi.jifL ^-^-•fc±^.|k-^-i;i^^^: |1^i'"-?^5l-^;i: 7^^ --v :r, :i.i.: -i'Jfv^" ,.? - --i ' ' !i'-^K^.- ^V^^'fl^f*"^^^^ :--^:'' ^---- ~ !

; 'BffM.; - . s . . - . . - -.. 5^. , ; . . ,: ;- -. i

t jip^Xi S-f^liiji'M^ii!!^^

'^-^^^yjjtii^^Sj^fij^^

i

Page 18: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS

Number of Stations ______________ 'a 35* -—————— ———— Number of Readings ___ 5*351 (Y) l

Station interval ————— —— _______________________ ' ' ————————— . ———-

Line spacing _________ IjOO ' fr 200 * ___________________ '-Profile scale or Contour interval* DiP Idfe- V^O" ^d quadrature lg-

(ipecify for each type of iurvey) ; .

MAGNETIC , - , . . .

Instrument ________________________________ : ——-....—^^--————————Accuracy - Scale constant ———————————————— I ——— '. —————— !Diurnal correction method __________________________ . ———————-———Base station location ——--—-—----———--^^^^———^-^--—--—.^^^.^—^^^^^^.—^-------^---

ELECTROMAGNETIC, t Ronka E M 16 InstrumentCoil configurationCoil separation ---——.——.---——...—....---——-—.—-^Accuracy —..^.^..^..^.——-———^-^.—.—^-....^-—^.^.—.—

Method: (H9 Fixed transmitter EH Shoot back CD Inline d Parallel lineFrequency ________ ̂ ntler. ^ine ____ 17.6

(ipecify V.L.F. tUtion)

Parameters measured ——-—————-^—^-——-——————-————-GRAVITY

Instrument.Scale constant.

Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy———————————————INDUCED POLARIZATION RESISTIVITY

Instrument—-—-—--————-———-————————Time domain——————————————————————————— Frequency domain. Frequency_______________________________ Range——^^.^^^^.Power~.^^—--------^--^^-——-—-————-—---——-——.^^—-———-—---.^-——Electrode array—— Electrode spacing. Type of electrode.

Page 19: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

File.

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

DEC 2 8TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT

FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

I97J

Type of Survey. Magnetometer

OFFICE USE ONLY J

^, . , ', , , , Metron Exploration Limited # 2571 .laim hnlrlpr(Kj

AnthnrnfKppnrt J.O.WLnaTS Box596

AHHrpss NQIT Lickaard ^t*Oaring fWpc of Snrwy Sept. li - 28,1971.

(linecutting to office)

TWalMilocMf T.inPriit 10.67

SPECIAL PROVISIONS DAYS CREDITS REQUESTED r.^,.;,., P" **

li if*/^! vrttTi ci om f*t i ^*

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first -Magnetometer ———— hQ ——

7

ENTER 20 days for each -Otheradditional survey using Ornlnpiralsame grid.

Ocnrhernical.. ,,,..,.,.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

MagPPtnrnpter ..filpotrnmaprnetir RaHinmetrir(enter days per claim) ^^

l/ Author of Report ^"^^~--

PROJECTS SECTIONRes Gpnl Onulifirations

Prpvinnc Surveys

rhprkpH hy rlatp

OF.OT.nnir:Ai.KUANnn

Apprnvpd hy dat(-

r.RnTnnirAT.RWAMrn

AnnrovpH hv d uff*

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

S jff O Jit) *in rt *\rjH jfjj&flssc 3-'-73/^(prefix) (number)

s 317378s 31737?S 317350

S 317381 .... ..

S S22599

^ J23332S 323333

S 32333k

TOTAT,n,AIMS -11

S

M*T

JM

tt

Page 20: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVF.Y?

Number of Stations ___________ - _________________ Number of Readings Station interval _______________ IQQtLine spacing _____________________ k00 ' and 200'Profile scale or Contour intervals____________200 L~——

{specify for each type of survey)MAGNETIC

Instrument _______________Sharpe M F - l fluxgate

Accuracy - Scale constantDiurnal correction method____hourly

RT T9 E Base station location-————-J!——————

ELECTROMAGNETIC

Instrument.Coil configuration. Coil separation —— Accuracy————Method: CU Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back C! Inline EH Parallel line

Frequency-^-—-^—^-^^——^-—^—-—-.—.—————^.————-—-—————-——.———.—.^^^^^^—^(specify V.L.F. station)

measured ————————————————————————————————

Instrument.Scale constant.Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

ri^J lZATiQN RESISTIVITY

Instrument.

Time domain___________________________ Frequency domain.

Frequency_______________________________ Range^^^—.^^^Power.—^^—.^^^^^—^^^^^-^^—^-—-————————.——————-————

Electrode array-— Electrode spacing. Type of electrode .

Page 21: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

OFFICE USE ONLY

File.

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

RECEIVED

DEC 2 B 1 971PROJECTS SECTION

Type of Survey. Geology

PivisioiTownship or ^ rp!iM-..rchay Tup,. Sudbury Claim holder(s)____Metron E:xp3.oration Idmited____T2j?7

?302 - U01 Bay St.Toronto, Ont.

J.G.WillarSAuthor of Report ̂ ^————^—Address———o^-. rjo^,—Wan, T rf cVacy-H—fin*—

A-'VA.^J 7 W *1C?W AJJL OiVC7CU. CI^ VJ.1U0

Covering Dates of Survey-

Miles of Line cut —

month of October 1971.(linccutting to office)

10.6?

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

DAYSGeophysical

—Magnetometer.

—ixciciioi—Other.

20

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer_____Electromagnetic _____Radiometric ————(enter days per claim)

PROJECTS SECTION Res. Geol. Qualifications.Previous Surveys

by.

. HRANr.M

Approved by. .date.

GEOLOGICAL BRANCH.

Approved hv

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

(prefix) (number)

.....S................3J.7.37.7..........,8........,......3I7.37.a....8................317.375..

.J5................317.381.

.St........S

........3229.92..323000

323332323333

323331*

TOTAL CLAIMS. /f

Page 22: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEY!)

Number of Stations_____________c^r*————————————Number of Readings___f*35Station interval_____________________________ ———————————————Line spacing____________________________LOOS and 200' -————————

Profile scale or Contour intervals_______________________________________(specify for each type of survey)

MAGNETIC

Instrument .^^—^^-—-———^-^^——^^-—.———————————Accuracy - Scale constant — Diurnal correction method. Base station location-———.

ELECTROMAGNETIC

Instrument——-———Coil configuration. Coil separation ——Accuracy——————.

Method: CH Fixed transmitter O Shoot back d Inline CD Parallel line Frequency___________________________________________________________

(specify V.L.F. station)

Parameters measured———————————————————————————————————————————————————— GRAVITY

Instrument.Scale constant.

Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy————-—-————————— INDUCED POLARIZATION RESISTIVITY

Instrument———^——.—————-———————.

Time domain_____________________________ Frequency domain.

Frequency_____________________________ Range——————Power-—^-——-^—.^—.^—-^—.^——^—————-——-—-—————————————Electrode array——

Electrode spacing. Type of electrode,

Page 23: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

LJ

Ul

1kJ

o i

w ^

iCO

f

-J

l

.j 7 f X

/.4/r

f v^

NV

Ja

ckpi

ne

\

' 0

0

0

J

Ul

W w -i \

i '

ii

-t-i

;

j t i i-*-

i4 i 4. f i i -f-

i

CL

2 !5s

JU OJ i: CO "-

Be

ula

h

Tw

p.

v..

...

. 5

M

\

A M

0\

( 1

x^1

j po

iL^y..

i

40*e/

,/i

— - —

-T--- T

r-trr-

-ii

' i

' y 1

\ i

! ; 3

1737

7 , 3

1737

6 3

22

99

9 i^

SO

Op, 3

2300

1 ;

^1

13173781333334

32

33

33

[ 3233^2

; i

oi —

— ]—

..-.—

-4—

-^ K

;,l III

()

Z '

"M

' i3

l7379

!3l7

38

0

1317

381 } —

— J ^

i-

i _ -i

—,.

i JU

-9 1

"i

Vf-\

"M

AR

SH

AY

TW

P.

(f^ H

IND

EX

M

AP

\

SC

ALE

--

1 IN

CH

^ 4

0

CH

AIN

S

Jack

pine

, po

plar

, bi

rch

San

d an

d

/i

O

Spr

uce,

bi

rch,

bo

pla

r

Pin

e, i

sp

ruce

,

bilr

ch.

po

pla

r

and

grav

el

LE

GE

ND

' A

X

/J'

7

Stri

ke

and

dip

of

shea

ring

Birch

, p

op

lar

Geo

logi

cal

cont

act

assu

med

GE

OLO

GY

SU

RV

EY

2 3

O O

l

ME

TRO

N

EXPL

OR

ATIO

N

LIM

ITE

DM

AR

SH

AY

T

WR

, O

NT

.

41

P0

3N

W0

01

6

2.7

27

M

AR

SH

AY

200

^ ̂

xG

. W

illors

B

.AS

c.,

PE

ng.

Oct

. 19

71

Page 24: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

Beu

lah

Tw

p.-i^

M^.

X.A

, M

S~^

l i

Pa z

hi g

y

'T

3173

77

3173

76

3173

7BI3

2333

4

322999

'B23000'

....

j ̂71

3 E

3333

1 32

3

3I7

37

9J3

I73

80

31

7381

fl_

___J--- J-

MA

RS

HA

Y

TWP

.

3^2J

;

1:-f

t

L ^

^i J:

IND

EX

M

AP

SC

AL

E :

l IN

CH

z

40

CH

AIN

S

MA

GN

ET

IC

DA

TA

Conto

ur

inte

rval

200

gOT

imas

Norm

al

corr

ect

ion

- no

ne

nst

rum

ent

used

S

harp

e M

F-

l fU

xgate

Abo

ve

1000

gam

mas

re

d

Bel

ow

O

ga

mm

as

blue

GEO

MAG

NET

IC

SUR

VEY

MET

RO

N

EXPL

OR

ATIO

N

LIM

ITE

DM

AR

SH

AY

T

W R

, O

NT.

Sca

le :

l

200

J.

G.

Will

ars

B A

Sc.

, P

Eng

. O

ct.

1971

4IP03NW0016 2.727 MARSHAY

210

Page 25: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

hJ

O N -t,.-

*a i' i^ i L

1

. 1- i'

l. J ] l 1 1. :

,--f'

1 .*

-i

\ t-i- r i ^ t -i

i* 1 1 1 ir-

1*

1 ^fc

' - -r

t; 7

•..'

t:

f-i

" t -f

-Zi

J,,

'V i,

4-

Be

ula

h

Tw

p.

s,M

d

l

:H

^ v f CO 5tM

l MA

RS

HA

Y

TW

P

IND

EX

M

AP

SC

ALE

^ l

INC

H -

40

C

HA

INS

-t-

323

O O

f

46

MIL

EPO

ST

T

EL

EC

TR

OM

AG

NE

TIC

D

ATA

Sta

tkxi

us

ed

Cut

ter,

M

aine

C 1

78

kH

z)

read

ings

ta

ken

faci

ng

nort

h

Dip

pr

ofile

1/50

Qua

drat

ure

prof

ile1

/50

" -

!0Xo

-

Dip

val

ues

reco

rded

to

Th

e le

ft.

Qua

drO

ture

va

lues

re

cord

ed

to

the

right

.

Neg

ativ

e va

lues

p

lotted

to

th

e le

ft.

Posi

tive

valu

es

plot

ted

to

the

right

.

Con

duct

or

axis

VL

F-E

MS

UR

VE

Y

ME

TRO

N

EXPL

OR

ATIO

N

LIM

ITE

DM

AR

SH

AY

TW

P.,

ON

T.

Sca

le :

2OC

41P

03N

W00

16

2.7

27

M

AR

SH

AY

220

G.

Will

ors

B

.A.S

c.,

pEng

. O

ct.

1971

Page 26: REPORT ON GEOLOGICAL AMD GEOPHYSICAL SURVEB for …

10+OON

4-5

20+00 S

cviJ

f~ f r

Z A -

- 10+OON

0+00 BASE LINE

3-1

10+00 S

LEGEND

5 MILLISECOND CONTOUR INTERVAL

l MILLISECOND CONTOUR INTERVAL

CHARGEABILITY LOW

N

CJLd CJ

UJ00OJ

SCALE-l" = 400'

a:5H

UJ 5M--

UJxCO

4M --

I 317379 J 317380 !LL^. —_ .J

**

MARSHAY TWP.

M. 855

CLAIM AND LOCATION MAP

MARSHAY TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO

SCALE- l" * 2640'

2M

N

^

CJ

41P03NW0016 2 .727 MARSHAY S30

. G

\

\ \

\

UJ CJ

10+00 S

20+00 S

LEGEND

3 ELECTRODE ARRAY

L/M r 2

10,000-1

^SSOOOHin iUJZ CO

1000 J-Olo

a - 200 FEET

UJ00 OJ

N

POTENTIAL DIPOLE TO THE S. ON SECTIONS S. OF B.L.TO THE N. ON SECTIONS N.OF B.L.

SCALE- l" = 200'

10+00 N

0+00 BASE LINE

PLATE l

METRON EXPLORATION LIMITED

MARSHAY TOWNSHIP, ONTARIO

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEYSCINTREX MARK M 2.5KW UNIT

SCALE : l"- 200'

SURVEY BY SEIGEL ASSOCIATES LIMITED

SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 1971

41 P3