Reebok Crossfit Nano Speed Proving to not ever rest until they've got crafted an all-conquering, all-in-one CrossFit weapon, thereebok crossfit shoe review will be the company’s latest iteration of your popular trainer. Reebokreally is apparently actively refining this shoe with every generation, this third version introducesmany developments worth test at. My first impressions were that it would be a attractive shoe thatcould likely attract plenty of attention. The superior difference from previous models will be the web-like “DuraCage” across the upper. This, with the black on beautiful red colors combo of my test pairgave off a robust “Spider-Man” vibe which was definitely eye-catching. Like its predecessor been onprevious years, this shoe received plenty of play in the recent 2013 CrossFit Games. It’s certainly agood illustration showing the shoe’s abilities that three-time champion Rich Froning placed both ofthem to great use throughout the games. But exactly how can this shoe accumulate through out usmere mortals? Straight away this seems like an increasingly substantial shoe versus the Nano 2.0 was. It feels afeeling wider while using the rugged sections feeling a little sturdier and the other bits as lightweightas possible. You are able to feel some additional cushioning in the midsole, and in addition a higher asense of stability, in keeping with the claim of your dual-density construction. The very last Nano wasthere is no ultra-tactile lightweight, but this shoe feels more solid and planted. You can find a bit moretaper underfoot through the midsection, but overall truly the only has similar shape and dimensionsfor the reason that previous model. The rope-guard featuring a wrap-around tread remains this, suchas remainder of the sole, seems manufactured from a good sturdier rubber compound than before.Given this potentially less flexible construction truly the only features a more segmented design thanbefore with all a style of directional splits for increased flexibility. As well as the most part it works -these are very responsive shoes, even given their heft. On the subject of heft, these are a good 9.7ounces (275g) in the men’s size U.S 9, compared to 9.0 oz. With the Nano 2, that is an 8% increase.Your next noticeable change would be that the toe-protection is far more exaggerated than before.Now we have a practically rigid rubber cap across the front which feels super-tough. However theprevious model had the duragrip toe cap, I’ve seen a couple of pairs of Nano 2s with substantial wearacross the toes from repeated burpees and the like - I don’t check this out happening all the onversion three. Never imagined of your Nano 2 to be a simple or lightweight shoe, nonetheless it feasible for waynow after wearing the Nano 3 - this really is one serious piece of kit! How should it perform across adiverse range of disciplines? Let’s focus on the spot during which these are very likely to perform theweakest; considering previous models this may be running. Exactly like the Nano 2.0 this shoe mightbe a cushy but crashy partner if you’re just cruising around the neighborhood. Put some pace on andthere’s plenty of traction but little feel. Even so the increased sponginess of your midsole causes it tobecome pleasant enough for quick 400s in the WOD. Regardless, you won’t set any records withthese and I wouldn’t recommend them for virtually every serious distance. Put simply - there areactually a lot better running shoes around (something Reebok is keenly alert to, therefore the NanoSpeed that is recently reviewed here on WLShoes).

These shoes can be extremely “at home” working out where they perform certainly. Step on theplatform and Oly lifts are executed with more confidence than you could typically discover in a trainer.Again, it is a solid shoe. The grip and stability really leave you with an actual sense of finding myselfcontrol. The rubber outsole is super grippy and smacks down hard on system when you are gettingaggressive by using a lift. All over they think more locked-down while using the cage construction, asif a lifting belt for ones feet! In the event it arrived at gymnastic movements I came across theseoffered mixed results. The extra-reinforced toe area means they impervious to bars, so toe-to-barscan be a thing of joy. You are able to allow your feet fly when necessary and worry less about kickingthe bar with an excessive amount force. But … that very same reinforcement tended to smash mytoes around on burpees greater than I used to be acquainted with. Something about rigidness of yourtoe-box meant my foot bounced around greater than I expected and tended to kick or punch the toe-cap a whole lot. This could be due to the size difference I noted; one more reason I do think I ought tohave gone down one half size. I lieu of your toe smashing effect I modified my style a little andperhaps they are not even close unusable, but I’d provide the nod to old Nano 2s for burpees, despitethe possible longevity issues there. The additional cushioning in the midsole helps when dropping offbars or rings at a height, and the increased weight is just not enough to cause any issues. From the shoe is really a claimed new anti-friction liner - the simple truth is I can’t tell any difference.Due to the overall construction, purpose and weight of your shoe, they’ll do not be catastrophe optionfor back-to-nature sockless wearing anyhow. The greatest change with this report is … the tongue!Miraculously it now stays constantly in place. I really enjoy seeing the tongue over a Nano 2 migratessideways during first minutes to get laced up, though the Nano 3 is firmly constantly in place up to theend of a workout. If you’ve read any of my previous reviews you’ll understand how a very good petpeeve through me! Designed to suit is interesting. I grabbed the identical size 9 as my Nano 2.0 anddiscovered designed to suit to generally be quite different - definitely bigger. I’ve spoken to canprovide homeowners been down half a size quite comfortably. I’m often unwilling to appear at firstsight a good half-size larger, but there are several clear differences. By my measurements there maybe some additional length, but at most of the about 4-5mm. This can be enough to generally benoticeable, and not enough to obtain the all clear to drop half a size whenever you order. Why are me feel as if you can, however, is somehow they can be wider also. Well, maybe not goodtape, but definitely by feel. I’ve spoken to other wearers to verify my suspicions, and have absolutelyfinally figured versus eachother. The Nano 2 has a wide last, then again the mesh upper tapersnoticeably across the foot. When it comes to the latest model, the rubber “DuraCage” upper whichruns such as a structural web to keep the mesh constantly in place, provides the toe-box morevolume. When it’s off your foot it actually stays rigid the place where a normal mesh upper will deflate.Out of this vantage point, you could clearly see that the top actually balloons out from the aspect trulythe only, and then sits higher across the foot. Again, it's difficult to measure and maybe only a mmoccasionally, but merely one evaluate the two shoes side-by-side leaves you in without doubt of yourroom created. Significantly improved I do think regarding this, I’m convinced I possibly could havegone down half a size, but don’t hold me on it! Considering the variety of brands now vying with the attention of your reebok crossfit shoe reviewcrowd, it is a statement shoe. This is a bold entrant that plays heavily on its strengths. Unlike the

latest Balance or Inov8 shoes which function such as an extension of one's foot, the Nano 3.0 neverdisappears. Reebok has managed to increase the risk for shoe quite technical while still comfortable.You will be always alert to the shoe’s presence on your foot, nonetheless it does work along withoutfeeling clumsy. I must say, that despite the extra heft and the slight sizing disparity, these have getmy default shoe for the coaching and training. Add some realization they look like something Spider-Man would rock from casual Friday and I’m sold!