community: the chicago school. social darwinism popular intellectual fashion in late c19th early...
TRANSCRIPT
Social Darwinism
• Popular intellectual fashion in late C19th early C20th USA
• Treated social and economic competition as “natural”
• Connected to eugenics: preserving the race
Chicago School
• University of Chicago emerging in the 1890s as an innovative research centre– Chicago a new kind of city– Application of new ideas
Chicago School
• UofC Philosophy programme:– John Dewey as leading influence– Strong on pragmatism– Influenced by Darwin’s ideas on evolution
Chicago School
• University Settlement House– Jane Addams and Ellen Starr lead Hull House
programme to aid the poor immigrant
Park on Community
• Community results from competition with other social groups for living space– Size, resources, location, internal organization– Internal workings and institutions
Social Ecology
• Competition– people compete for living space in the city, like
plants and animals in a jungle
Social Ecology
• Ecological dominance– some groups, and land uses achieve dominance
over others – analogous to ecological dominance
Social Ecology
• Invasion & succession– social groups can colonize new areas, and
create the conditions for other groups to invade– like plant communities
Critique
• Developed for early C20th Chicago, but does not apply in other places/times.– 1920s Chicago a
city of the streetcar and the El
Homer Hoyt 1930s
• Expert on real-estate and land economics
• Designed shopping plazas
• By 1930s arterial highways beginning to distort rings into sectors and wedges– Sector model
Critique
• Competition represented as a process of “natural”.– Makes capitalism seem “natural”– Makes racism seem “natural”
Critique
• Residential areas treated as if they have uniform social character– actually more diverse
• Shows ignorance of subsequent critics– Park, Burgess, McKenzie knew the city to be
diverse
Critique
• Implied moral judgements– Burgess et al viewed middle-class white
heterosexual households as normal, everyone else as deviant
• Valentine plays the same game too
Critique
• Represents power as a product of “natural” competitive processes
• Discourages more serious consideration of power in the urban landscape
Legacy
• The term “ecological” in sociology– ecological correlation– ecological fallacy
• Schools of Social Ecology