1

Adequate Yearly Adequate Yearly ProgressProgress

Fresno Unified School DistrictFresno Unified School District2005 Data Review2005 Data Review

2

Federal K-12 Accountability Federal K-12 Accountability System System NCLB- AYPNCLB- AYP

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

100% of Students proficient or above by 2013-2014

Status Bar Model w/Intermediate Targets: Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)

Consequence – Program Improvement (PI) Status

3

FUSD Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) FUSD Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) ResultsResults

21 Year-Round Schools have reports posted with only 2 attendance tracks

District report is posted, but missing year-round data

“Safe Harbor” has not been calculated

Program Improvement Reports will be posted on September 15

Full API Reports (For CA State Accountability) will be available in late October

6

The August 31 AYP Report The August 31 AYP Report included …included …

104 Schools104 Schools 7 Direct Funded Charter Schools 8 Comprehensive High Schools 15 Middle Schools 61 Elementary Schools

21 Year-Round Schools 40 Traditional or Modified Traditional

Schools

11 Alternative Schools 1 Fresno Adult School 1 Year-Round Achievement Center

7

FUSD AYP Summary in this FUSD AYP Summary in this presentation include data presentation include data from…from…

74 Schools74 Schools 8 Comprehensive High Schools 15 Middle Schools 40 Elementary Schools 11 Alternative Schools

8

FUSD AYP Summary in this FUSD AYP Summary in this presentation Does NOT include data presentation Does NOT include data from …from …

30 Schools30 Schools 21 Year-Round Schools

Data for these schools is incomplete

7 Direct Funded Charter Schools 2 Schools Reported in Error

Fresno Adult School Year-Round Achievement Center

9

4 Main Components of 4 Main Components of AYP AYP

Participation (95%)

Proficiency (AMOs) Percent proficient or above CST (gr. 2-8) CAHSEE (gr.

10)

API

Graduation Rate

10

How Did Fresno Unified How Did Fresno Unified Do?Do?

Baird Middle School will exit PI status!Ayer Elementary will exit PI status!56 of 74 schools increased the percentage of proficient/advanced students in ELA57 of 74 schools increased the percentage of proficient/advanced students in Math

Reminder: This does not include data From 21 Year-Round Schools, 7 Direct-Funded Charters and 2 schools reported in error (Fresno Adult School, Year-Round Achievement Center)

Reminder: This does not include data From 21 Year-Round Schools, 7 Direct-Funded Charters and 2 schools reported in error (Fresno Adult School, Year-Round Achievement Center)

11

How Did Fresno Unified How Did Fresno Unified Do?Do?Schools Making AYPSchools Making AYP

Addicot (Irwin O.) Fulton Special EducationAyer Elementary Gibson ElementaryBaird Middle Herbert Hoover HighBullard High Holland ElementaryBullard Talent Project Jackson ElementaryDewolf West High Kratt ElementaryDuncan (Erma) Polytechnical High Malloch ElementaryEaton Elementary Manchester GateEdison Computech McCardle ElementaryEdison High Powers-Ginsburg ElementaryFigarden Elementary Starr ElementaryForkner Elementary Thomas Elementary

12

How Did Fresno Unified How Did Fresno Unified Do?Do?ParticipationParticipation (Schoolwide and all subgroups): 73 of 74 schools made AYP

ProficiencyProficiency (Schoolwide and all subgroups): 31 of 74 made English Language Arts (ELA) AYP 40 of 74 made Mathematics AYP 30 of 74 met Both Subject Areas

APIAPI 67 of 74 Made the API schoolwide additional indicator

for AYP

Graduation RateGraduation Rate 16 of 17 Schools where this was applicable made AYP N/A at 57 Schools (Elementary, Middle, 2 Alternatives)

Reminder: This does not include data From 21 Year-Round Schools, 7 Direct-Funded Charters and 2 schools reported in error (Fresno Adult School, Year-Round Achievement Center)

Reminder: This does not include data From 21 Year-Round Schools, 7 Direct-Funded Charters and 2 schools reported in error (Fresno Adult School, Year-Round Achievement Center)

13

ParticipationParticipation

95% of students are required to take Standards Tests (CST, CAHSEE, and CAPA)

14

FUSD – AYP Participation FUSD – AYP Participation 2005*2005*

74 74

19 1929 29

65 64

35 3542 42

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Schools Missed Part. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Schools Made Part. 74 74 19 19 29 29 65 64 35 35 42 42

ELA MATH ELA MATH ELA MATH ELA MATH ELA MATH ELA MATH

Schoolwide African Am Asian Hispanic White EL

Number of FUSD Schools Making/Missing AYP Number of FUSD Schools Making/Missing AYP Participation: 2005Participation: 2005

Reminder: This does not include data from 21 Year-Round Schools, 7 Direct-Funded Charters and 2 schools reported in error (Fresno Adult School, Year-Round Achievement Center)

Reminder: This does not include data from 21 Year-Round Schools, 7 Direct-Funded Charters and 2 schools reported in error (Fresno Adult School, Year-Round Achievement Center)

Note: dataReported for Schools by Significant Subgroups.

Note: dataReported for Schools by Significant Subgroups.

15

ProficiencyProficiency

Schools are evaluated on the percentage of students who score proficient or advanced on English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics tests.

Elementary and Middle Schools: CSTs Grades 2-8 High Schools: CAHSEE Grade 10

Annual Measurable Objective

16

AMO’s: English Language AMO’s: English Language ArtsArts

Elementary and Middle Schools Elementary and Middle Schools (Students in Grades (Students in Grades 2-8)2-8)

89.2%

24.4%13.6%

67.6%

56.8%

46.0%

35.2%

78.4%

100.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2001-2002

2002-2003

2003-2004

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

2013-2014

19

AMO’s: MathAMO’s: Math Elementary and Middle Schools Elementary and Middle Schools (Students in (Students in

Grades 2-8)Grades 2-8)

37.0%

47.5%

58.0%

68.5%

79.0%

89.5%

26.5%16.0%

100.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2001-2002

2002-2003

2003-2004

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

2013-2014

23

FUSD – AYP Proficiency FUSD – AYP Proficiency 2005*2005*

Number of FUSD Schools Making/Missing AYP Number of FUSD Schools Making/Missing AYP Proficiency: 2005Proficiency: 2005

48

4 48

1929

34 32 31

6

22

3125

10 10

19

8

3530

2 3

35

19

42

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Schools Missed Prof. 31 25 10 10 19 8 35 30 2 3 35 19

Schools Made Prof. 42 48 4 4 8 19 29 34 32 31 6 22

ELA MATH ELA MATH ELA MATH ELA MATH ELA MATH ELA MATH

Schoolwide African Am Asian Hispanic White EL

Reminder: This does not include data from 21 Year-Round Schools, 7 Direct-Funded Charters and 2 schools reported in error (Fresno Adult School, Year-Round Achievement Center)On this particular graph, the Academy for New Americans did not have any proficiency groups.

Reminder: This does not include data from 21 Year-Round Schools, 7 Direct-Funded Charters and 2 schools reported in error (Fresno Adult School, Year-Round Achievement Center)On this particular graph, the Academy for New Americans did not have any proficiency groups.

24

AYP/AMO – Reporting AYP/AMO – Reporting GroupsGroups

SchoolwideEthnic/Racial Groups

African American (not of Hispanic origin) American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino Pacific Islander White (not of Hispanic origin)

Socioeconomically DisadvantagedEnglish LearnersStudents with Disabilities

25

Numerically Significant Numerically Significant SubgroupsSubgroups

Reporting for groups with at least 11 students, but…

Schools held accountable for groups of: 100 students, OR 50 students who comprise 15% of the

student population

28

API API An “additional” California indicator for An “additional” California indicator for AYPAYP

API above the “status bar”, OR

Growth of at least one point

29

The API “Status Bar”The API “Status Bar”Defining Progress on the API as the "Other" Indicator of AYP

770740

710

680

650

620

800

560

590

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

2001-2002

2002-2003

2003-2004

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

2013-2014

API

Sco

re

OROR Growth of 1 API Point Each

Year

30

Graduation RateGraduation Rateas an “additional” Indicator for AYPas an “additional” Indicator for AYP

A school meets this “other” indicator for high schools by… Having a rate above the “status bar”, OR Showing growth of at least 0.1 point growth, OR Showing growth in the rate of at least 0.2 in the average two-year rate

31

Graduation RateGraduation RateDefining Progress: Graduation Rate an "Other" Indicator of AYP

82.9%

82.8%

83.6%

83.0%

83.1%83.2%

83.3%83.4%

83.5%

82.5%

83.0%

83.5%

84.0%

2001-2002

2002-2003

2003-2004

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

2013-2014

Gra

d R

ate

OROR Improvement of at least 0.1 from previous

year

OROR Improvement in the rate of at least 0.2 in the average two-year

rate

33

Program Improvement Program Improvement IdentificationIdentification

Missing AMOs in either subject area two years in a row English Language Arts Mathematics

Missing the AMO means: Missing any criteria in the subject

area for any significant subgroup

Missing API or Graduation Rate two years in a row

34

How Did Fresno Unified Do?How Did Fresno Unified Do?Program Improvement (PI) Program Improvement (PI) StatusStatus

6 of 7 schools that receive no Title I funding (not eligible for PI) made AYP14 of 22 Non-PI Schools made AYP 2 of 12 “Watch” Schools made AYP (0 of 3 Y-R) 1 of 8 PI Year 1 Schools made AYP (0 of 10 Y-R) 1 of 6 PI Year 2 Schools made AYP (0 of 6 Y-R) 0 of 5 PI Year 3 Schools made AYP 0 of 14 PI Year 4 Schools made AYP (0 of 2 Y-R)

Official PI results will be released on Sept 15, 2005Official PI results will be released on Sept 15, 2005FUSD projects 62 of 95 Schools will be in PI statusFUSD projects 62 of 95 Schools will be in PI status

Reminder: Estimated results from 21 Year-Round (Y-R) Schools. Not included: 7 Direct-Funded Charters and 2 schools reported in error (Fresno Adult School, Year-Round Achievement Center.

Reminder: Estimated results from 21 Year-Round (Y-R) Schools. Not included: 7 Direct-Funded Charters and 2 schools reported in error (Fresno Adult School, Year-Round Achievement Center.

35

How Did Fresno Unified Do?How Did Fresno Unified Do?Program Improvement (PI) Program Improvement (PI) StatusStatus

2 Schools appear to have exited PI Status Baird Ayer

3 Schools may make “Safe Harbor” Lawless Robinson Webster

Reminder: This does not include data from 21 Year-Round Schools, 7 Direct-Funded Charters and 2 schools reported in error (Fresno Adult School, Year-Round Achievement Center)

Reminder: This does not include data from 21 Year-Round Schools, 7 Direct-Funded Charters and 2 schools reported in error (Fresno Adult School, Year-Round Achievement Center)

36

Program ImprovementProgram Improvement

37

Exiting PI StatusExiting PI Status

Meet ALL criteria for two years in a row …

Both ELA and Mathematics AND ALL Numerically Significant

Subgroups

38

FUSD Districtwide 2005-06 FUSD Districtwide 2005-06 Performance Targets: A Roadmap for Performance Targets: A Roadmap for ImprovementImprovement

1. Make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in 2005-062. Students score “proficient/advanced” on the CST 3. Non-proficient students advance at least one

level on the CST4. Special Education students score “proficient/

advanced” on the CST/CAPA5. English Learners advance at least one level on

the CELDT

39

Districtwide Performance TargetsDistrictwide Performance TargetsMake Adequate Yearly Progress Make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in 2005-06(AYP) in 2005-06

Meet 95% Participation requirement

Meet all proficiency requirements in ELA and mathematics for all significant subgroups (AMOs as set by school level)

Meet API requirement (590+ or grow 1 point)

High Schools meet graduation requirement

40

40% of FUSD students will score “Proficient/Advanced” on the CST in ELA for their grade level or subject.

In 2005, 24.6% scored “Proficient/Advanced”

40% of FUSD students will score “Proficient/Advanced” on the CST in mathematics for their grade level or subject.

In 2005, 23.5% scored “Proficient/Advanced”

Districtwide Performance TargetsDistrictwide Performance TargetsStudents scoring Students scoring Proficient/Advanced on the CSTProficient/Advanced on the CST

41

Districtwide Performance TargetsDistrictwide Performance TargetsStudents advancing at least one level on Students advancing at least one level on the CST the CST

75% of students who are “Far Below Basic” in 2005 will advance at least one level in 2006.

(In 2005, 57% in Mathematics and 47% in ELA)

50% of students who are “Below Basic” in 2005 will advance at least one level in 2006.

(In 2005, 26% in Mathematics and 34% in ELA)

50% of students who are “Basic” in 2005 will advance at least one level in 2006.

(In 2005, 23% in Mathematics and 21% in ELA)

No student will drop to a lower level.

42

40% of FUSD students will score 40% of FUSD students will score “Proficient/Advanced” on the CST in “Proficient/Advanced” on the CST in ELA for their grade level or subject.ELA for their grade level or subject. In 2005, 3.8% scored “Proficient/Advanced”

40% of FUSD students will score 40% of FUSD students will score “Proficient/Advanced” on the CST in “Proficient/Advanced” on the CST in Mathematics for their grade level or Mathematics for their grade level or subject.subject. In 2005, 6.5% scored “Proficient/Advanced”

Districtwide Performance TargetsDistrictwide Performance Targets Special Education students scoring Special Education students scoring “Proficient/ Advanced” on the CST/CAPA“Proficient/ Advanced” on the CST/CAPA

43

Districtwide Performance TargetsDistrictwide Performance TargetsEnglish Learners advancing at English Learners advancing at least one level on the CELDTleast one level on the CELDT

75% of English Learners will make an Annual one level gain on the CELDT (Title III AMAO) In 2005, 58.3% made a one level gainPrevious Year CELDT

Proficiency Level

Annual Growth Target

Beginning Early Intermediate

Early Intermediate Intermediate

Intermediate Early Advanced

Early Advanced or Advancedbut not at English Proficiency (One or more skill areas below Intermediate) 

Achieve English Proficiency (Overall Proficiency level needs to remain at Early Advanced or Advanced level and all skill areas are at the Intermediate level or above.)

Early Advanced or Advanced and at English Proficiency Maintain English Proficiency

44

Fresno Unified School Fresno Unified School DistrictDistrict

Using Assessment and Data to Guide Instruction

45

Cycle of Cycle of TeachingTeaching

Reflection

Analysis

Planning of Instruction

Assessment

Instructional Strategies

46

How can we really impact How can we really impact student learning by using student learning by using data effectively?data effectively?

Analyze data Reflect on past teaching practices Plan for instruction Implement new strategies Assess new learning

47

Next Steps for Next Steps for PrincipalsPrincipals

Present this Powerpoint and discuss PI implications with staff by September 23rd Analyze school results and FUSD performance targets with site leadership team, and prepare school targets and discuss with your Assistant Superintendent Set monthly data review meetings with staff, and begin process of differentiating instruction to meet student needs

48

How to Access this How to Access this PresentationPresentation

49

QuestionsQuestions Dave Calhoun 457-3810

Eric Wenrick 457-3876

Paul Mesenheimer 457-3850

Ben Atitya 457-3824