the missing link – how do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?
DESCRIPTION
THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?. Prof. dr. Dirk J. Korf University of Amsterdam Bonger Institute of Criminology Conference ‘Identifying Europe’s needs for effective drug policy’ Lisbon, 6-8 May 2009. Quantitative & Qualitative. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
THE MISSING LINK –How do we include qualitative
information in monitoring systems?
Prof. dr. Dirk J. Korf University of Amsterdam
Bonger Institute of Criminology
Conference ‘Identifying Europe’s needs for effective drug policy’
Lisbon, 6-8 May 2009
![Page 2: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Quantitative & Qualitative• Quantitative • -> KNOWLEDGE: WHAT & HOW MANY?
– Which drugs – By how many people– In which categories (age, gender, ..)
• Qualitative • -> UNDERSTANDING (‘Verstehen’): WHY?
– Why these drugs– In this way – By these people – In these contexts
![Page 3: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Most monitoring relies on quantitative data– Official statistics (treatment, law enforcement) – Self report data from surveys
• Completeness: All indicators have limitations– Data might predominantly reflect policy
• drug law offences, seizures, treatment demand – Under-representation of relevant groups
• heavy users in general population; school drop outs in ESPAD– Qualitative: generalization often questionable
• Timeliness – General Population Surveys very expensive – no annual data
• Too late for early signals– Qualitative: could be more timely, particularly with new drugs in
specific groups or settings. • Qualitative researchers often complain they need more time (thus:
more money)
![Page 4: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
General population surveys predominantly measure non-use
Dutch population 15-64 years
77.4% never cannabis
95.9% never hard drugs
WHY so many people don’t even try drugs?
0%20%40%60%80%
100%
Cannab
is
Hard D
rugs
XTC
Cocaine
Ever Used Never Used
![Page 5: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
And predominantly ex-use (discontinuation)
Dutch population 15-64 years
¾ ever users not last year
Indicates user culture of (self) regulation
0%20%40%60%80%
100%
Cannabis Hard Drugs
Not Last YearLast Year, Not Last MonthLast Month
![Page 6: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Plausible vs. Strange Trends
ESPAD (15-16 years) Cannabis
How to explain that LTP in Ireland dropped from 39% to 20%?
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
1995 1999 2003 2007
Ireland Portugal Poland
![Page 7: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Trends in drug use• WHY do certain substances become popular and
other seem to fade away? • Qualitative methodologies offer alternative
opportunities to observe new drugs or new trends in drug use at an earlier stage, as well as to better understand such developments.– Ethnography
• observation, field notes, informal talks, in depth interviews– Panel studies
• (lay) experts interviewed individually– Focus groups
• users, non-users, experts • exchange knowledge, experience, attitudes ..
![Page 8: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Antenna Panel Study Amsterdam
0
1
2
3
4
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
LOW
.....
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
... H
IGH
Laughing gasGHBKetamin
![Page 9: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Validation thru Triangulation
• Triangulation -> fuller picture and might help to fill gaps and explain contradictions– Parallel trends in data do not automatically prove trends in
use (i.e. arrests and treatment)
Noaks & Wincup (2004)• Data triangulation: different kinds of
data• Investigator triangulation: > 1 researcher• Method triangulation: different methods• Theoretical triangulation: multiple
perspectives & hypotheses
![Page 10: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Triangulation data, method & investigator
• Laughing gas:– Used in balloons, acute effects (laughing, falling).
Observations (number of balloons, suppliers, behaviour) and surveys among clubbers confirm decline.
• GHB:– Sold in small bottles, acute effects (OD) . Observations
(number of bottles on the floor after party, users in coma), surveys among clubbers and emergency (First Aid) data confirm trends.
• Ketamine:– Strong effects on locomotory system. Observations
(‘strange dancing’) and surveys among clubbers confirm trend.
![Page 11: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
WHY these trends? • Laughing gas:
– UP: Funny feeling, happiness fits into party mood.– DOWN: Accidents, decreased availability thru self-
regulation of legal suppliers. • GHB:
– UP: Combines well with XTC (extends high, better asleep after party). ‘Drunk without alcohol’. Cheap and easy to make.
– DOWN: Accidents (self-observed and rumours), reputation (‘rape drug’) & HR-prevention (don’t mix with alcohol).
– ‘REVIVAL’: As UP. • Ketamine:
– UP: Distinction from mainstream. Fits in trend towards more underground party’s / ‘slower’, more psychedelic music. Underground -> upperground.
![Page 12: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Antenna Panel Study Amsterdam XTC, Coke & Speed
0
1
2
3
4
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
LOW
.....
......
......
......
......
......
......
......
... H
IGH
XTC
Cocaine
Amphetamine
![Page 13: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Why Popularity of XTC Decreased?
• Need for distinction: XTC becomes an ‘old’ drug, used by too many mainstream people
• First experience never comes back– Often translated in terms of “quality has gone down”
• Growing awareness of negative effects– Tuesday dip– Perceiving others who show dependent behaviour– Reports on overdose– Long term consequences (brain damage)
• Multi-ethnic youth; electronic music less popular- Urban (latin, hip hop etc.)
![Page 14: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Why Cocaine Competes with XTC?
• Time for a new wave (distinction)• Problematic cocaine use associated with crack-
cocaine, not with powder cocaine• Growing interest in small & private parties
– Partly due to more police control in clubs & at parties– The ritual of snorting cocaine is more social than
swallowing an XTC pill• Cocaine high lasts shorter -> better possible to
be ‘fresh’ for work after the weekend • Price: 50 euro/ 1g.; 12,50 euro ¼ g.
![Page 15: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Why Ecstasy is Still Going Strong
• XTC is still perceived as relatively harmless (no junkie drug)
• Electronic music is still popular among white youth, commercial large scale raves offer big multi media spectacle
• Newcomers in the party scene label XTC as the perfect party drug
• Ongoing product innovation and fair price
• HOWEVER: MCPP ….
![Page 16: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Why Amphetamine Not Popular in Amsterdam Dance Scene? • Too cheap and ‘dirty’.• Low availability (not very profitable)• Distinction; associated with:
– hard core scene, – ‘farmers’ (people from rural areas) – ‘beginners’, young party goers who cannot afford to buy
cocaine.• Unpleasant in your nose.• Effects last too long (sleeplessness).
• Why more popular in other regions and countries?
![Page 17: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Horizontal & vertical trends
• Vertical: Trend followers become part of developments initiated by trendsetters; drugs spread over other scenes.
• Horizontal: New developments spread from centre of innovation to other parts of the country
![Page 19: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Horizontal: Amphetamine
• Horizontal and some vertical spread.
• Rural vs. urban.• Most popular in
Underground & Hardcore scene.
• Revival of appreciation speed to reduce alcohol effects
• Users under estimate risks
![Page 20: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Contextualisation• Zinberg: Drug use can only be understood from
the interaction between Drug, Set & Setting.
• Drugs have different meanings for different people in different settings. – XTC at home = introspection– XTC at party = dancing– XTC at ‘soft’ party = dancing and feeling of togetherness– XTC at ‘hard’ party = energy to keep dancing
• Why true narcotics used in dance scene? – Distinction, GHB as substitute for alcohol, not everyone
likes to dance …
![Page 21: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
K.: Party vs. Private Setting“A K-hole is like a near-death experience. If
you wish such an experience, you better take ketamine at home.
Sometimes a dozen of us are tripping at a party and when new people pass by, you don’t know how to behave. When others see you having fun with ketamine, they are more likely to try it.
That’s also because our group is fun into experimenting with drugs and sex.”
(Angel, clubber, 65a, 2008).
![Page 22: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Vertical: Drug use and scene in NL
![Page 23: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Vertical: Dynamics in drug use & scene
![Page 24: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Horizontal: ketamine
• Horizontal and some vertical spread.
• Regional differences.
• Most popular in underground scene.
• Not tolerated in mainstream & urban.
![Page 25: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
GHB, Ketamine & Music Preference
(Club Survey, Antenna Amsterdam 2008)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Dance Urban Mix / Other
GHBKetamine
![Page 26: THE MISSING LINK – How do we include qualitative information in monitoring systems?](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814145550346895dad26ae/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
SO YOU THINK YOU CAN DANCE … ON K. …