state library of south australia j. d. somerville oral ... · interview with james douglas everett...

37
STATE LIBRARY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA J. D. SOMERVILLE ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION OH 770/10 Full transcript of an interview with JAMES DOUGLAS EVERETT on 03 December 2007 by Catherine Murphy for the CAMPBELLTOWN ORAL HISTORY PROJECT Recording available on CD Access for research: Unrestricted Right to photocopy: Copies may be made for research and study Right to quote or publish: Publication only with written permission from the State Library

Upload: others

Post on 24-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • STATE LIBRARY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA

    J. D. SOMERVILLE ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION

    OH 770/10

    Full transcript of an interview with

    JAMES DOUGLAS EVERETT

    on 03 December 2007

    by Catherine Murphy

    for the

    CAMPBELLTOWN ORAL HISTORY PROJECT

    Recording available on CD

    Access for research: Unrestricted

    Right to photocopy: Copies may be made for research and study

    Right to quote or publish: Publication only with written permission from the State Library

  • 2

    OH 770/10 JAMES EVERETT

    NOTES TO THE TRANSCRIPT

    This transcript was created by the J. D. Somerville Oral History Collection of the State Library. It conforms to the Somerville Collection's policies for transcription which are explained below.

    Readers of this oral history transcript should bear in mind that it is a record of the spoken word and reflects the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The State Library is not responsible for the factual accuracy of the interview, nor for the views expressed therein. As with any historical source, these are for the reader to judge.

    It is the Somerville Collection's policy to produce a transcript that is, so far as possible, a verbatim transcript that preserves the interviewee's manner of speaking and the conversational style of the interview. Certain conventions of transcription have been applied (ie. the omission of meaningless noises, false starts and a percentage of the interviewee's crutch words). Where the interviewee has had the opportunity to read the transcript, their suggested alterations have been incorporated in the text (see below). On the whole, the document can be regarded as a raw transcript.

    Abbreviations: The interviewee’s alterations may be identified by their initials in insertions in the transcript.

    Punctuation: Square bracket [ ] indicate material in the transcript that does not occur on the original tape recording. This is usually words, phrases or sentences which the interviewee has inserted to clarify or correct meaning. These are not necessarily differentiated from insertions the interviewer or by Somerville Collection staff which are either minor (a linking word for clarification) or clearly editorial. Relatively insignificant word substitutions or additions by the interviewee as well as minor deletions of words or phrases are often not indicated in the interest of readability. Extensive additional material supplied by the interviewee is usually placed in footnotes at the bottom of the relevant page rather than in square brackets within the text.

    A series of dots, .... .... .... .... indicates an untranscribable word or phrase.

    Sentences that were left unfinished in the normal manner of conversation are shown ending in three dashes, - - -.

    Spelling: Wherever possible the spelling of proper names and unusual terms has been verified. A parenthesised question mark (?) indicates a word that it has not been possible to verify to date.

    Typeface: The interviewer's questions are shown in bold print.

    Discrepancies between transcript and tape: This proofread transcript represents the authoritative version of this oral history interview. Researchers using the original tape recording of this interview are cautioned to check this transcript for corrections, additions or deletions which have been made by the interviewer or the interviewee but which will not occur on the tape. See the Punctuation section above.) Minor discrepancies of grammar and sentence structure made in the interest of readability can be ignored but significant changes such as deletion of information or correction of fact should be, respectively, duplicated or acknowledged when the tape recorded version of this interview is used for broadcast or any other form of audio publication.

  • 3

    J.D. SOMERVILLE ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION, STATE

    LIBRARY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA: INTERVIEW NO. OH 770/10

    Interview with James Douglas Everett recorded by Catherine Murphy at

    Campbelltown, South Australia, on 3rd

    December 2007 for The State Library of

    South Australia’s Campbelltown Oral History Project.

    DISK 1 OF 1

    This is an interview with Jim – or is it James? –

    James.

    – Everett.

    Everett, that’s right.

    E-V-E-R-E-double-T, and the date is Monday, 3rd

    December 2007 and it’s eleven-

    thirty in the morning, we’re at the Campbelltown Library out the back, in a

    special quiet room. So, Jim, I’m going to talk to you today about the history of the

    Campbelltown Uniting Church in particular, but first of all I’d like to get a little

    bit of background about you as a person. So can you tell me your full name and

    date of birth?

    Right. James Douglas Everett. I was born in Gawler, 19th January 1943.

    And who were your parents?

    My parents were George or Douglas and Mavis Everett. We lived on a farm at

    Roseworthy, between Roseworthy and Templars. That farm had been developed by

    my great-grandparents in 1850, when they’d taken it from original scrub, literally,

    into a farm. So I was the fourth generation.

    Was it mixed farming?

    A mixed farm, yes.

    And what was your mum’s name?

    Mavis. She had been Spry, was her maiden name. She’d come originally from

    Hamley Bridge, been born in Hamley Bridge, but had lived most of her young life in

    Adelaide but then married back into territory where her grandparents and parents had

    lived also.

    Okay. So where did you do your primary, secondary and tertiary schooling?

  • 4

    The farm was part of a family estate and so in the 1950s we came to live in St Peters

    in the house that had been my grandmother’s and I was educated at East Adelaide

    Primary, Norwood High School, and then while I was working I did some studies,

    some accountancy studies, at what was then the old School of Mines which is now

    part of the University of South Australia.

    So when you say the farm was a family estate does that mean it was divided up

    amongst the family and your family moved to Adelaide?

    It was part of a trust. My grandfather had died when my father was nineteen and so

    my father assumed the running of the property and the family estate for forty-five

    years and so he chose to come to the city but still kept some interest in the country.

    But I’m an only child and I was born when my father was in his late forties, so I’m a

    generation out on normal ages.

    And, Jim, what work did you do when you left school?

    I started off, like most people, as the office boy in a big retail company and you

    started off, as always, learning the basics – ordering stationery and delivering cheques

    and all those things that used to happen. You did your study at night and you learnt

    commercial values and bookkeeping and all those things, a lot of it on the job.

    So tell me about your family and connection to organised religion, and whether

    you were brought up in the – Methodist? –

    Yes.

    – Church, just give me a little bit of background to that.

    My great-grandparents, when they arrived in South Australia in 1850, first settled in

    Woodville for about twelve months and then they moved to what was then called –

    well, the farm was between Roseworthy and Templars, the little township, and they

    then became involved with what was then the Wesleyan Methodist Church and my

    great-grandfather was one of the foundation trustees and builder of that church, and

    that became the home, I guess, the spiritual home, of the family till the 1950s. In

    fact, I was baptised in that church, as was my father and grandfather, and most of my

    relatives are buried in the little cemetery behind that church today.

    My mother came to live in the city and she was very involved with a church in

    Halifax Street called Madge Memorial Methodist Church, where her older sister

  • 5

    played the pipe organ. And Mum joined the church choir at fourteen and she did

    have an excellent voice, as soprano, and then in 1930 she joined what was then the

    Pirie Street Methodist Church Choir and stayed there till 1940, and so she was very

    much part of the youth and the activities of the Church and my father in the country

    was also. So I grew up, I guess, in that environment. We also had links with Gawler.

    My mum would sing at every wedding and every event, was always the guest soloist

    ever since I can remember, and then when we came to St Peters she joined the choir

    at Spicer Memorial and that’s where I grew up, too, and so I’ve been part of the life

    of, I guess, the Methodist Church since literally I was taken to church, probably,

    when I was two weeks old, I don’t know. (laughs)

    So I suppose that story explains your interest in history.

    Yes. Yes, very much.

    As well as in relation to the history of the Church.

    Yes.

    When did you formalise that interest?

    I guess the interest was really formalised – I’d always been very interested in family

    history and South Australian because we were unique in the sense that the family had

    stayed on one property for all of that period, which meant that all of the records and

    ledgers and everything – and I still have them – were never destroyed, as happens

    when families move; and my father, even though we lived in the city, constantly

    travelled back to his friends and his country associations. And being an only child I

    guess I heard all the stories, which never generally happens when you’re a big family.

    My church history interest, when I joined what was then the Methodist Historical

    Society in 1970, when I was invited to become the Secretary of the Council of that

    society. And then in 1973 I was invited to write a lecture which later became

    published on the history of Pirie Street Methodist Church, which was at that stage

    going to be closed before they combined with what was Stowe Congregational

    Church to form one congregation, and I was invited to write that. So I guess that

    really did develop – because of family links – develop my real interest.

    And the church historical society that you became the secretary of, who was

    involved in that and how did you kind of make contact with them?

  • 6

    Well, the first approach came through one of our retired ministers, who used to for a

    while live in Campbelltown: Reverend G. Bellamy Stribley[?], who had been the

    editor of the Methodist paper, monthly publication, for the state and was involved in

    the Council and knew of some history interest, invited me to join and to become the

    secretary, and so from that you develop all the links and all the networks; and, as

    does happen in a small community and in the church community, you have many

    links and networks and relationships and people that you’ve met. It is, was, like a

    big, big family.

    So, Jim, were you working as an accountant –

    Yes.

    – and also involved as a lay preacher?

    Yes.

    What was your involvement with the Church, as a preacher?

    I was working full-time and, as in the Methodist Church, as in the Uniting Church,

    people can be trained to become a lay preacher, which is a voluntary task but you

    have to do training, and that is something that would happen on weekends. But I’ve

    been in full employment and even now I only work – I’ve reached the stage where I

    now only work twenty hours a week because I’m just about due to fully retire.

    And where did you do that training, and then where did you preach?

    The training I did, in those days you did it through your local church, generally

    mentored by a minister, and in our case at Campbelltown there was three people that

    did the course together for nearly two years and we were mentored by the minister at

    Payneham Road Methodist Church, who was a very good scholar. And the minister’s

    wife at the time, Melva Rofe, and Janet Munro, the local doctor’s wife, we did the

    course together and then, since that time, I’ve chosen to preach at other parishes,

    because you get an invitation, and we had a number of friends in the country and

    because of my country links I was invited to regularly preach at places like Riverton

    and Gawler, Freeling, et cetera.

    Could you spell the names of the people, the women, that you did the – – –?

    Yes, right. Rofe, R-O-F-E, and Munro, M-U-N-R-O.

  • 7

    Thank you. Jim, when did you move to Campbelltown and was it at the time that

    you married?

    We married in January 1966 and we bought a block at that time in Osborne Street,

    Campbelltown, which was a reasonably new subdivision, and we built a house during

    that year, so we’ve been in Campbelltown since 1966. At that stage, the East Marden

    School, which backs onto our block, was just a remains of an orchard and there was

    only four houses in our street. The Linear Park, of course, didn’t exist and neither did

    the O-Bahn, that was still growing vegetables. The government had acquired the land

    but it was still market gardens. So we’ve been in Campbelltown from that time

    onwards.

    What was the attraction of this area to you, starting out as a young family? Was it

    just the price of the land or other things?

    Well, having grown up with our local links in St Peters and eastern suburbs you

    tended to – most of your friends tended to move when they married to Tea Tree

    Gully, Vale Park, Modbury, this general direction, so there was an attraction to move

    in the same area. I mean I would not normally, I suppose, consider living the other,

    western side of the city – not that there’s anything, but just because all of your friends

    and your contacts. And we like the area, we looked at dozens of blocks, but we just

    loved the position of our block and we’ve benefited, of course, because the Linear

    Park is now at the end of our street.

    I’m just looking at the book that you’ve written From Darley to Campbell Town1 –

    two separate words, as you pointed out – and it’s the history of the Campbelltown

    Uniting Church 1847–1981. So you lived through the last decade of that time, and

    I’m wondering if it would make sense, now that we’re at that point in the

    interview, for you to tell me about the last decade and then we’ll go into the early

    history.

    The last decade, when we arrived at Campbelltown of course the Methodist Church

    was still very strong and at the time when we arrived at Campbelltown there’d been

    much growth in the area, particularly from the Lower North East Road up through

    Hambledon[?] Road, there’s been a lot of areas being built, and we arrived at a

    church that had a Sunday school of about three hundred children.

    1 From Darley to Campbell Town : a history of the Campbelltown Uniting (formerly Methodist) Church,

    1847-1981, Coterie Publishers Australia in conjunction with Campbelltown Uniting Church, 1981.

  • 8

    Where’s the church?

    At Campbelltown.

    Whereabouts, what address is it?

    It’s at 609 Lower North East Road, Campbelltown. And the congregation was

    probably – on most Sunday mornings, the church, which seats about two hundred

    people, was full. And so during those first ten years that we were here or those first

    ten years, which were the last years of Methodism, we had three children of our own

    who were baptised in that church and many other people came so that there was a lot

    of growth, there was a lot of young marrieds, of people that had been married, you

    know, in the last ten years, who were new to the district. There was also quite a

    group of people of the original gardening families who had owned the land, who their

    families had been part of the church for the last hundred years, who were still present

    in the congregation.

    And who were some of those families?

    Well, I can think of people like the Packer family, the Stocks – they are still there,

    there was the Pitts and the Neills, the Jameses and also the Genans.

    And Neal is N-E-A-L?

    No, N-E-I-double-L.

    And Gehan?

    Gehan, G-E-H-A-N. And the Headings[?] also, they were related to the Gehans. In

    addition there were a number of new people, and of course the confusion is that there

    is also Shirley and Reg Neale, N-E-A-L-E, who are the owners of Paradise Motors,

    and they were members, they came perhaps five years before us to Campbelltown

    Methodist Church.

    So that was a very interesting decade at the beginning of major changes.

    Yes.

    And how would you identify those changes?

    I think the changes were very strongly in that people were coming in with new ideas,

    they’d come many from many different suburbs, and they came in with new,

  • 9

    innovative ideas and probably some of the old families weren’t always ready for

    change, because many of those families had stayed in the district and had married in

    the district and had never been out, particularly in the life of the church, to see what

    happened elsewhere.

    And who was the reverend then and how was that change managed, or that

    conflict – generational conflict?

    The minister when we came was the Reverend Clarrie Hore, H-O-R-E. He came in

    and I think he managed it – most people were open to change and people really got

    on very well. There were two particular families who didn’t really cope with it and

    during his ministry they chose to worship elsewhere, mainly because I think they’d

    been perhaps very dominating in the past and found it a bit hard to take – not a back

    seat, but to not have complete control. And so that group for a while worshipped

    elsewhere and, while Mr Hore didn’t really make changes, but he brought it a little bit

    perhaps up-to-date.

    What were some of the innovations?

    Well, I think they needed to accept the bigger Sunday school and to be a bit more

    tolerant of children, because when you’ve got a big Sunday school of three hundred

    children it’s pretty difficult to manage that. There was changes in worship, to a

    certain extent, a different choir and a style that perhaps they’d never been exposed to.

    In fact, I can remember being a trustee of the church – there was a certain number of

    people appointed trustees to manage the property – and at a particular trustee meeting

    a member of the congregation offered a brass cross to place on the communion table,

    and the vote from the trustees was five against and seven to accept. And one trustee’s

    comment was, ‘We can’t have that, we’re going to Rome’. So there was very much

    still a Protestant attitude of a few, and that particular gentleman’s only died three or

    four years ago and I think he would have still held that view to today, even though

    now the church has a cross out the front and an illuminated cross on the wall, plus

    that (laughs) brass cross on the communion table that was a gift. So there was things

    – symbolism has changed in the worship of the church. Particularly, Campbelltown

    was a country church. The church I worshipped in, Spicer Memorial in Fourth

    Avenue, St Peters, was a Methodist church and our worship was not much different

  • 10

    to the local Anglican church, where in fact we would chant the psalms and have what

    I’d call ‘high church’ worship, I suppose.

    Is ‘Spicer’ – – –?

    S-P-I-C-E-R, Spicer Memorial, in Fourth Avenue, St Peters.

    And did it become a little more relaxed and less traditional in other ways? And I

    read in the book that the church began to accommodate mothers’ groups and

    young people’s, teenage groups.

    Yes.

    Were you involved in any of that?

    We were involved to a certain extent because my wife was involved with the young

    mothers when the children were little. The youth group, our children were probably

    too young for that, but some people did start to develop youth groups and alternative

    options; whereas traditionally, as a small country church, there would have just been

    worship and Sunday school – and a tennis club. Tennis club’s always been very

    strong at Campbelltown and it was almost, for some of us, I think, some people –

    some of the old families saw the tennis club as more important than anything. It had

    been a social outreach even from the ’30s. But these other groups, there needed to be

    a bit of tolerance because they would use the hall for a social and things like that and,

    you know, people can become a bit – have ownership of space, but there was nothing

    went on that you [wouldn’t] expect normal children and normal teenagers – – –. But

    there needed to be a bit of give and take. But there was never really big tensions. As

    I say, there was a couple of families that didn’t cope with it and chose for a while to

    (laughs) worship elsewhere.

    What was the biggest change at the end of this period that occurred?

    I think the biggest change was that we, with the Uniting Church coming into place in

    1977, that some of the old links – – –. Methodism always operated in like what they

    called a ‘circuit’ where you had two or three churches together and, while they had

    their individual minister, they shared, supported each other financially and in other

    ways; and since early days Campbelltown had had a very strong relationship with

    Payneham Road Methodist Church, the one at Marden on the corner of Payneham

    Road and Lower Portrush Road at Marden; and in earlier days, particularly in the

  • 11

    1930s and ’40s when it was a small, country congregation, Payneham Road

    Congregation had in fact supported the cost of ministry; and the ’70s and Uniting

    Church brought change. Payneham Road, we lost that link and we became linked

    with the new suburbs of Athelstone and Dernancourt, and we were the strong

    financial church then and it was our turn to support them financially with ministry

    and, in fact, when the first minister went to Athelstone just after the year of the

    cyclone which I think was ’76, the Campbelltown trustees – that was before Uniting

    Church – in fact paid nearly ten thousand dollars for the new manse. It doesn’t sound

    a lot of money but that same manse today would cost probably four hundred thousand

    dollars. So there was change of associations and support.

    So you became the parent, not the child.

    Yes. We became the parent. And at that stage, of course, the church was very strong

    financially, numerically. They were the strong days, and in fact one of the things that

    happened was we built a porch on the front of the building to try and alleviate the

    road noise because in the 1960s, late 1960s, seven foot of the land was taken away to

    widen the Lower North East Road, and that was a project, but that was the main

    building project that that property has had since about the 1920s was this porch, and

    it’s like a meeting area and a porch which acts as a buffer for road noise. Prior to

    that, there’d been just minor building alterations like the sanctuary area was

    remodelled to reflect the current open style rather than the central pulpit, but the

    major building was to put on the porch at the front.

    In the process of uniting the Methodists and Protestants –

    The Congregational and Presbyterians, yes.

    – yes, where did the Campbelltown church stand within that debate?

    Well, the vote to go into union was taken about eighteen months before and I think

    out of our congregation there was about sixteen people voted against going into

    union. But, in fairness, union – Uniting Church – really meant for Campbelltown and

    Dernancourt and Athelstone and these eastern part of the suburbs no change because

    there was no Congregational or Presbyterian churches in the area to combine, so for

    many people they saw it as a name change – and in some ways, up until the last five

    to ten years, that’s really about what did happen. The government has changed, the

  • 12

    method of government within your local congregation changed, but really we weren’t

    faced with needing to combine with the local Presbyterian church around the corner

    which meant that we could have had to sell property, because many churches where

    there’s been combination has meant sooner or later the congregation’s had to make a

    decision about property.

    Amalgamation.

    Amalgamation and sale of property. I wonder, (laughs) if there’d been that situation,

    whether the vote would have been different; but, of course, the Methodist Church was

    a corporate church and if seventy-five per cent of the congregations around Australia

    voted the whole Church went in, whereas in the case of Congregational and

    Presbyterian Churches, each congregation was a separate legal entity and if they

    didn’t vote to go to union they didn’t. But of course in South Australia the

    Congregational churches were very small in number and so were the Presbyterian

    churches. Interstate – Sydney, Melbourne, in Victoria and New South Wales – the

    Presbyterian Church is a very strong continuing church, as big as the Uniting Church;

    but South Australia was uniquely Protestant and had been settled, of course, by very

    strong Methodists. In fact, Methodists were in the early 1900s, if you look at census,

    were more prominent than even the Anglicans.

    So where did the archival historical arm of the Methodist Church fit within all of

    this amalgamation? And you must have been involved at that point: how was it

    handled?

    Well, what happened with the history, the Methodists had had a historical society to

    foster history and maintain history since the 1950s. They changed – as happened so

    much in South Australia – they changed the name, of course, to the Uniting Church

    Historical Society, established a new council and invited people from the other two

    denominations to join, so it became a society for the three denominations. Each of

    the other two denominations had not had a society as such, but they’d both had a

    person who had been called their archivist, so they’d had an individual person that

    looked after their history. And all of the three Churches had always deposited their

    principal records with the State Library in a special collection, and even today there

    are four collections in the State Library: the Methodist Church Collection, the

    Congregational Church Collection, the Presbyterian Church Collection and now the

  • 13

    Uniting Church Collection, and we’re still continuing to add to those collections.

    They are the principal minute books and the principal records, the ..... and local

    histories and newssheets are maintained by the Historical Society at their own

    History Centre.

    Are you the official archivist for the Uniting Church?

    I am now. I was only appointed eighteen months ago. So my task now is, as

    churches surrender records, is to sort through those records, determine what is

    principal and that must be lodged with the Library, determine what must go to the

    History Centre and determine what ends up being recycled, because so often – and

    which we prefer people to do – is to give us all their records, but some things like a

    list of the number of scones that were sold at the Strawberry Fête are not really

    relevant because if they’re recorded in a minute book that’s okay; but any loose bits

    of paper and things like that, some are kept depending on their value, but the majority

    of those become recycled.

    Very interesting. I’ll just have a pause and we’ll have a drink of water. I think

    now is the time to go back into the history of the Uniting Church in Campbelltown

    and how it was decided, and when it was decided, that you would write this book.

    Well, I was approached by the local committee of elders because they were going to

    celebrate the hundred and twenty-fifth anniversary of the Campbelltown Methodist

    Uniting Church. Now, they’d chosen as the anniversary date the hundred and fiftieth

    year from the opening of the first church in Chapel Street, Campbelltown – hence the

    name – and they’d also celebrated the centenary based on the 1858 date, and so I was

    invited to write this history. When I started to write the history, in fact, I established

    that before they had built in Chapel Street in 1858 they’d been meeting as a

    congregation at Darley, which was the little suburb which is now recognised by

    Darley Road, and they in fact had met in the Traveller’s Rest Inn that was run by a

    gentleman called Mr James Crowle, spelt C-R-O-W-L-E – Crowle Road at Paradise

    is named after him – and that they were part of the Adelaide Wesleyan preachers’

    plan or circuit, which stretched from Willunga to Princess Royal Mine out at Burra,

    and Darley was a preaching place and they normally had their services at three

    o’clock on a Sunday afternoon. So that was really in a way the beginning of the

    congregation.

  • 14

    This is what date?

    Eighteen forty-seven. But the celebration was based on the first building, so once

    you’ve established a date you really can’t change, even though some people wanted

    to, it was appropriate. So the book was produced for the hundred and twenty-fifth

    anniversary.

    So the growth of Methodism in this district, the Campbelltown district, was closely

    linked to the development of the Wesleyan Methodist Society in South Australia,

    the birth of that. Is that correct?

    Yes, because in Methodism there was four groups: there was the Wesleyan

    Methodist, the Primitive Methodist, the Bible Christians and the Methodist New

    Connection. The other three were splinter groups from the Wesleyan Methodist but

    they all came to South Australia from different parts of England, many established –

    like at Moonta, there was thirteen Methodist churches of all the different persuasions

    (laughs) in the township and the mining area of Moonta. In 1900 they all came

    together to form the Methodist Church in South Australia and in 1902 nationally they

    came together to form the Methodist Church of Australasia. But the Wesleyans

    probably were the predominant because they tended to be the merchants and farmers

    and, even today, if you go round the city and look at Uniting churches, you can

    identify the style of building relating to the churches like Wesley Church at Kent

    Town, that grand church that seats fifteen hundred people; the one at Payneham

    Road, on the corner of Payneham Road and Marden; Malvern Uniting Church: they

    are built in a style of reasonably – like, for the time – reasonably prosperous and

    fairly traditional. The Bible Christians and the Primitive Methodists tend to build

    little chapels, very sparse, and they represented in a way the merchant class and the

    workers – not that there weren’t workers in the Wesleyans, but the Wesleyans tended

    to be the people like the Waterhouses and the Coultons[?] and people that – they

    established Prince Alfred College very early in the piece, and John Dunne[?] the flour

    miller and the Bonython family and many of the merchant families and farming

    families, the Hannafords and people like that were members of that church.

    Very interesting. So you mentioned the first preaching circuit. When did that

    conclude and then what happened after that?

  • 15

    In about the 1850s, because of the sheer distance and the fact that they needed to rely

    on local preachers, which has always been one of the strengths of the Church, they

    started to create what they called circuits, which were groups of places, and they

    created – and Campbelltown, by 1858 when they were at Campbelltown, they were

    included with Norwood, Kent Town, Payneham, Magill and little Athelstone, and so

    they were a group. Then that group continued until 1914, when the grouping became

    Payneham, Campbelltown, Klemzig and that was the group. Then in the ’50s I think

    Athelstone came into the group, until 1977.

    How did the local – well, it wasn’t Campbelltown then.

    No.

    What do we call it? We just call it Campbelltown?

    Campbelltown. Even though the postal, official address was ‘Campbell Town’, as

    two words. But by about the 1860s, 1870s, it had just reverted to ‘Campbelltown’ as

    we know it today.

    So tell me a little bit about the history of who donated the land and how the first

    chapel in Chapel Street was built.

    Well, the land was given to the Church or they paid one shilling because they needed

    to transfer it from James Crowle, the gentleman whose hotel they’d met in at Darley

    Road, his hotel also had the pound alongside of it and the place where it is is from

    Lower North East Road, going up Darley Road towards the Campbelltown School,

    on your left about a hundred yards. That’s about where the pound and the hotel

    originally was.

    This is an animal pound, is it?

    Yes, animal pound. He was also employed by the local District Council of Stepney,

    as it was then called, as the pound keeper, and I gather – I’ve read separately – that he

    was a bit of character: that if he saw your cow wandering on the road he’d impound

    it so he could fine you and get paid. So he gave the land, he gave a block in Chapel

    Street, which is just off around the corner from Hill Street on the left-hand side, and

    today there stands a big Tudor house on the site which was built in 1930 by

  • 16

    Mr Kingsley Stock from Stock’s Garage, and he demolished it in 1930, the original

    old church, to build his home when he married.

    The original church was a rammed concrete and stone building, literally built by

    putting up boards and the concrete and rods and that were rammed in.

    Compacting.

    Compacted. And that remained the church till 1908.

    And no doubt it was called ‘Chapel Street’ sometime later, it would have been

    ‘Section’ something.

    It would have been a section that he gave, but there would have been a street, but they

    would have taken its name from the chapel because, traditionally, in the old

    understanding, the ‘Church’ was the Anglican in England and the ‘Chapel’ was for

    the Nonconformists, as they were known, so it was a name that tended to be brought

    out to South Australia. But as time went on the churches like Wesley Church at Kent

    Town were called ‘churches’ – and I mean they’re grand enough to be; Wesley

    Church seats fifteen hundred people, which is more than either of the cathedrals in

    Adelaide. But ‘Chapel Street’ would have come from that little chapel.

    What would have been around there, did you research any of that?

    At the time, on the main road where Stock’s Corner now is and the service station,

    there was a small blacksmith’s shop; but the rest were gardens. And there was a

    couple of houses later built in Chapel Street, because Chapel Street really is parallel

    to the North East Road and that was the edge of the village of Campbelltown and

    there were a few houses in there, but they mainly were on acre blocks where people

    could keep a cow or grow vegetables, and even in the 1930s photographs they were

    still growing – the corner of Hill Street and North East Road was all vegetable patch,

    and in fact I have an aerial photo that was taken in 1930 by Mr Kingsley Stock out of

    a little it would have been a Tiger Moth showing the street, and you can identify the

    church, the hall and the manse and their garage, and then you can see Hill Street and

    it’s all paddocks.

    There would have been no other chapel or church in the vicinity.

  • 17

    No. The nearest church would have been St Martin’s Anglican, which was built,

    opened I think a year before, on the corner of Gorge Road; and then there would have

    been a church at Payneham, Methodist church at Payneham – not at the site of the

    current one, but in Henry Street. And there was also later a little Congregational

    chapel built at Athelstone on the site of what is now the Athelstone Independent

    Cemetery, but that wasn’t built till about the 1880s, so it was the only church – oh,

    the Anglicans and the Methodists were the only two church buildings.

    Did they have a bell that would ring out –

    Yes.

    – for church on Sundays and was there a minister located there at that time?

    There was no minister here. The minister would have come from Payneham or

    Norwood or Kent Town.

    On horseback, no doubt.

    Yes, on horseback, yes. And he would have been part of what they called the circuit.

    The first minister was appointed to Campbelltown in 1912 and that first year was a

    lay person who lived here; and then the next year was the Reverend W.O. Harris, who

    was appointed, and he and his wife came – fairly young minister with twin daughters,

    and at the hundred and twenty-fifth anniversary one of those two daughters turned up

    to the function.

    Wonderful. And there is a manse for them to live in?

    There was a manse. The manse was built, it used to be on the corner – originally they

    rented a house on the corner of Chapel Street and Hill Street, and that was

    demolished about ten, twelve years ago. It never belonged to the Church, that was

    only rented. And in 1926 they built a bungalow house at 610 Lower North East Road

    and the minister still currently lives in that house. Ten years ago it had major

    renovations and additions, so it’s a four-bedroomed house with all of the modern

    requirements, but it’s a beautiful bungalow, and that was built in 1926.

    So in about the first half a century there was – – –.

    They really were – no minister; they relied on local preachers and they relied on the

    minister coming from the other churches. And they would have done that because

  • 18

    that was the normal practice within the Church, that the ministers would travel within

    their circuit.

    There was a bell, to answer your question, there was a bell in the turret, the little

    turret on the front, and when that church was sold in – when they built the new

    church on the Lower North East Road in 1903 they sold the old church to A.J. Stock

    who by then – in 1900 he purchased the blacksmith shop on the corner, and he

    purchased that little church with a view to use it as a place, as a paint shop. When he

    built a dray or a buggy he needed to take it out of the foundry to paint, so they cut a

    big hole in the side and made it into a paint shop. And the bell went up – was taken

    down and was sent up to Tiverton Station out of Burra and it’s still up there, because

    one of his daughters married the Tiver family at Burra, and it has been returned on

    special occasions just for the day, because they’re relations and Betty and John Fry,

    who live just down from the library here on Montacute Road, are related to that

    family and they’ve been able to borrow it.

    And it was one of the minister’s daughters, was it?

    No, it was one of the Stocks.

    The Stocks.

    A.J. Stock’s daughter married into the Tiver family, who are very well-known

    pastoralists out of Burra.

    How were the finances of all of this managed? Was it locally done or centrally in

    the state or the city?

    Normally the local congregation – well, they were given the land; they would have

    had to raise the money for the building and they would have borrowed, borrowed

    from the local bank, to have built. They used to have great fundraisers: tea meetings,

    which was an old-fashioned way, we would call it a ‘social’, but where there’d be a

    meal provided by the ladies and everyone would buy a ticket and pay, and that was a

    very well-known way in the Church of having a tea meeting and then after the meal

    or feed they would have a soloist and a speaker.

    Where would all this take place?

  • 19

    This would have happened in the church or, if they didn’t have a church, in early days

    when they were raising money for the Campbelltown church they had a couple in the

    Anglican hall at St Martin’s. But that was a common way of raising money, the tea

    meetings; and the story is told – not only here, but if you read Church history – that

    all the ladies would compete to see who could produce the best tray of food, as they

    described it. So competition’s still the same, only it’s in a different way, dressed up

    in a different manner. (laughs)

    And was there a trust set up to manage all of these finances, and who managed the

    trust?

    Well, in the Methodist Church there were trustees appointed for each individual

    property. They were appointed by the minister who was in charge of the individual

    circuit and they were appointed under the terms of a model deed for the Methodist

    Church – Wesleyan Methodist model deed – and at the time when that was being

    drafted Campbelltown Church was just being transferred, so we became, our trust, or

    the Campbelltown trust of 1858, became the basis of the model deed. It just

    happened that they were at that time, and then that became the way we held property

    right up until 1972. And each trustee had to sign, as you would as a trustee of an

    estate, and you were responsible and if they took a mortgage the trustees would have

    to guarantee it and sign for it.

    I wonder if it would be interesting to read a little bit of what you’ve written in your

    book about the early days in Campbelltown. It’s quite a good description of 1866,

    which is in this early period. If you don’t want to read the whole lot, just a section

    that you think is most interesting?

    I think it’s worth recording because it reminds us that what we now know as a city of

    Campbelltown is made up of a number of villages which were in those days, and

    really right up probably until the late 1940s, early 1950s, were still separate, very

    separate little communities, and it’s only since the subdivision’s taken place that

    we’ve come together as a city and in fact that’s probably one of the reasons why as a

    city we don’t really have a centre that’s identified as a city centre. We have our

    Council Chambers and our library, but we’ve never really had a city centre like a lot

    of cities do because we’re a group of villages. And this description is recorded in the

    South Australian Gazetteer, which was really like, I guess, an old road directory for

    want of a better word, and it describes:

  • 20

    Campbelltown is a postal township in the electoral district of

    East Torrens, Hundred of Adelaide, and under the control of

    the District Council of Payneham. It lies five miles

    north-east of Adelaide and is bounded on the west by the

    Torrens River, on the east by the south branch of the

    North-East Road. The township has an area of 260 acres and

    was named after C.J.F. Campbell, Esq. The main reservoir

    supplying the Adelaide Waterworks lies about half a mile to

    the east.

    The district is an agricultural one, the land being taken up as

    market gardens and for the growth of hay. There are also

    numerous vineyards in the neighbourhood and many of the

    farmers graze cattle on the outlying lands.

    The nearest places are Newton, one mile east; Paradise, half a

    mile north-east; and Darley, one mile north. There are no

    regular conveyances to these places and the communication

    with Adelaide is by omnibus twice a day.

    There is a Post Office, a Church of England, a Wesleyan

    Chapel and one hotel, the Glynde, about a mile south of the

    township on the Lower North-East Road.

    The surrounding country is low but the land is of good

    description, forming part of the Adelaide Plains, and the

    formation chiefly limestone. The population numbers about

    160 persons.

    Thank you very much. Beautiful. Let’s just talk a little bit more about those days.

    I read in your book that there were gatherings called ‘class meetings’, which were

    ways for local people to contribute, I think, to needy people in the district. Could

    you tell me a little bit more about that?

    The class meeting was very distinctive to the Methodist Church because the idea was

    that they met on a weekly basis within people’s homes to have prayers, share each

    other’s spiritual and physical needs – bearing in mind that there was no social

    security, so if somebody was ill or there was no sickness funds support each other

    physically – and also care for the congregation, for the church. This had grown up

    out of John Wesley’s original intention in England that he did not wish to break away

    from the Anglican Church but he wanted his people to meet together but to still on

    Sunday worship in the Anglican parish church. But as time went on they were

    excluded and so therefore they established chapels. So the class meeting was part of

    that. In a sense it was a caring fellowship group.

  • 21

    A grass roots – – –.

    Grass roots. But it also was important to study and share and part of their Christian

    growth and conversion. And in fact to be a member you were required to regularly

    attend a class meeting, and it was in about the 1880s, 1890s, that that gradually

    started to become, as the Church became more organised into circuits, that that

    became less and less and by the early 1900s most of them had ceased.

    It’s interesting in my book, and I’ve just remembered, I see that the classes met

    regularly and that they were averaging giving to the funds four pounds ten shillings a

    quarter, which was quite a substantial amount, which would have paid towards

    ministry and upkeep of the buildings. Normally with the church the upkeep of the

    building was maintained by people paying pew rents – P-E-W, pews – pew rents, and

    what would happen is that you as a family would reserve a seat in the church for your

    family and you would pay rent for it annually, which would be paid quarterly, and

    that would in fact pay for the maintenance of the building. It was a good idea but it

    also had some problems because if a visitor came (laughs) and sat in your seat some

    people would get a little bit upset by that. But that continued in many of our churches

    right up till the 1930s and the big churches – I can remember as a child going to

    Spicer, where my grandmother had worshipped, and we always out of habit sat in the

    same seat but her name was still on the card on the end of the seat even though pew

    rents had ceased; but up until the 1940s she would have paid.

    How much?

    Oh, it was probably something like four or five pounds a year. Depends on the

    congregation. Probably at Campbelltown it might have only been a couple of pounds

    a year; but that money they needed to maintain the building.

    So you would literally own a part of the church.

    Well, you had rights over it, I suppose, and if anybody sat in your seat I suppose you

    could invite them to leave, (laughs) which wasn’t probably – – –. But in a small

    congregation like Campbelltown there would have been the regulars and they would

    have [been] unlikely to have had a visitor because you were out in rural countryside.

    But that was how the money was raised.

    And were the stipends for the ministers paid from that as well?

  • 22

    That was paid mainly from the class meeting and from the offering, as is still the case

    today. We don’t have pew rents, but from the offering moneys a stipend is paid to

    the minister.

    So the wealthier the congregation the better off the minister is?

    No, because in the Methodist Church and in the Uniting Church the central body sets

    a standard stipend. Congregations can choose to pay above that, but these days the

    stipend is set to cover – if you add up the stipend plus the parsonage and the other

    benefits it’s probably these days equivalent to sixty or seventy thousand dollars a

    year, so it is market. In the early days the Methodist Church paid a stipend which

    was again centrally determined, but of course in those days the parsonages had big

    yards with lots of fruit trees and places for their horse, because they needed to keep a

    horse, and the families would – you know, fruit trees in those days, families

    preserved and made jam and did all of those things.

    Had a cow for milk.

    And probably had a cow for milk. They would have, certainly, here because they had

    a lot of space. Inner suburban may not have.

    And no shops.

    Well, there was a little grocery store, of course, in Campbelltown and it was on the

    opposite side from the manse. Well, in the 1930s there was a little grocery store run

    by the Floyd family and Ken Floyd, the son, is now the President of the Morialta

    Probus Club and he still lives in Campbelltown. But where the main Campbelltown

    Shopping Centre opposite the Campbelltown Methodist Church is now, that was a big

    market garden run by the Munchenberg[?] family and the road opposite Hambledon

    Road, opposite the church which comes up, didn’t even exist.

    So how were the children in the district involved in the life of the Church in these

    early days?

    Well, the children, there was the school at Campbelltown, which is now the site of

    the Marche Club – that’s M-A-R-C-H-E, Italian club – were all educated there and

    that was the original school, and the children there, and then they were

  • 23

    accommodated – in 1912 the Church built what they called a Sunday school hall so

    there was a place for them to go for activities, for Sunday school, for other events.

    No Sunday school before 1912?

    Oh, there was before 1912, but they would have in those days met in the old church

    or in the other church because there was no specifically separate – – –. We believe

    there was a Sunday school right from 1850s but they didn’t have their own separate

    building until 1912.

    And that was in the hall that was constructed that year.

    Yes. And it’s the current hall that the Church uses. It’s had additions but it’s the

    hall. And it’s interesting that one of the ladies in our congregation today, her

    grandfather laid the foundation stone of that hall and she still worships with us and

    she’s now eighty-eight.

    Who’s that?

    Well, the foundation stone was laid by Mr Pitt, who had a property on George Street

    at Paradise, and Mrs Betty Neill – spelt N-E-I-double-L – is his granddaughter and

    she is eighty-eight, and she still drives a car and worships with us most Sundays.

    Oh, wow.

    And so there still are – she is probably the lady with the oldest link, now; and he was

    also a first trustee of the church in Chapel Street.

    Wonderful. [I suppose the children and the families as a whole would have

    gathered – – –.]

    END OF DISK 1: DISK 2

    [And so there still are – she is probably the lady with the oldest link, now; and he was

    also a first trustee of the church in Chapel Street.

    Wonderful.] I suppose the children and the families as a whole would have

    gathered for recreation from the early days as well – for picnics or trips or tennis:

    what do you know about that?

    I was given a fair bit of background by Mr Kingsley Stock at the time I was writing

    the paper and he remembered when, as a student, when the school at Campbelltown

    got to a hundred scholars, which meant they got a second teacher.

  • 24

    In what year would this be?

    This would have been in about 1915, approximately. And he remembers as a child

    them having Sunday school picnics and picnics out at the paddock behind the church

    in what was the garden of the Rowney family, and Rowney Avenue runs at the back

    of the church and that was the dividing. He remembers picnics there.

    R-O-W-N-E-Y?

    N-E-Y.

    I just have to ask for the transcriptionist.

    Yes. That’s correct, Rowney. And he remembers that. He also remembers after

    school a lady used to have a reading session in the church, in the Sunday school hall

    for children, and used to read Pilgrim’s progress to the children and he was one of

    those.

    In about 1920 the first tennis court was laid behind the church and tennis became

    very important to a lot of those families. It started off as a cinder tennis court, just

    covered in cinders, but later asphalt, and by the 1960s they’d built four courts which

    are still there. They’re not all used for tennis these days but I think they still play

    social tennis on one and the other one’s used for netball.

    Was this competition tennis with other districts or just social?

    Well, it was social but it was also competition within the Church. The Methodist

    Church had the Methodist Church Tennis Association and churches used to play

    against each other, and there was fairly fierce competition. There was an annual cup

    and shield and on a number of occasions Campbelltown won it in the 1930s, and I

    think the Association still operates – be it limited – as the Uniting Church Tennis

    Association; and there was also a Uniting Church Cricket Association, which

    encouraged young people in the community – they weren’t always church people – to

    belong and that was important, particularly during the Depression years, when

    families couldn’t afford much, the fact that they could still play tennis or cricket was

    probably a very good social outreach.

    And did they have fêtes in those early days as well?

    Yes, fêtes and tea meetings were very much part of their fundraising.

  • 25

    So like an old English village, really.

    Yes. It was very much like a village. It’s also that during – I think from the 1930s,

    1940s, the local Red Cross branch always met in the Campbelltown Methodist

    Church Hall, and right up until the 1970s I think when it was disbanded, the local

    branch of Red Cross, they always met in the hall. And in the early days, in the 1930s,

    the trustees used to lease the back room to a local doctor for a surgery for a small

    time; and also in the ’50s they leased it to the Mothers’ and Babies’ [Health]

    Association – yes, that’s the name it used to be – as a clinic space for young babies

    and mothers before they built their own rooms which is behind the shopping centre at

    Campbelltown. So it in a way was very much like a village.

    How did the district and the Church community fare during the Great Depression

    – well, World War I, the Depression, World War II?

    Yes.

    What were the significant events or histories during that period?

    Both the First and the Second World Wars, it’s interesting to look: in the church

    there’s two honour rolls and if you look at those honour rolls you’ll find in many

    cases families where perhaps three or four sons went to war and numbers were killed,

    and so you’ll see the names and you’ll see the little cross alongside one name which

    means that they – – –. But whilst there was not a lot of people there were families,

    and of course in those days there were six and seven children often in a family, and

    so that would have affected some families. There’s some where there’s two sons

    perhaps killed, so the effect that would have had on the community, especially a

    small community – even in the Second World War it was still a small community –

    would have had some effect.

    The Depression, I suppose, it had an effect on the Church but I think they were

    lucky in the sense that they belonged to what we called the circuit and they had

    Payneham Road Church as the mother church and that church was always reasonably

    comfortable because a lot of the members there, as well as at Campbelltown, were

    gardeners and the Depression, whilst they might have got less for their goods, they

    didn’t suffer like people that depended on another employee for work; they could be a

    little bit self-sustaining. It would have had an effect on their income but it did mean –

  • 26

    They ate.

    – they ate and they probably had a little bit of money because they still could sell

    some produce.

    They might have had transport with horses.

    Yes. And the Payneham people, most of the members of Payneham Road Church,

    were fairly established families who’d been early – the Pitts and the Hobbses and the

    Jameses – and they’d been fairly well established, and for many of those families the

    Depression probably didn’t make – made some difference, but not the major

    difference that we understand perhaps in some areas where people depended on

    foundries and businesses.

    And when you say the Depression affected the Church, what do you mean by that?

    Well, it affected the Church in the sense that it meant that money was harder to come

    by, and in fact I do have a note in my book that during the Depression the circuit

    could no longer afford to have a phone for the minister so the telephone was cut off

    and people would have to leave messages for him with the store down the road and

    he would go down and get his messages once a day. So it would have had that effect.

    It would have probably meant that the basic stipend was less, but probably many of

    the people supported the minister by vegetables, as happened in the country, or meat

    or milk and those things. So in a small community they probably managed a little

    better than in some industrial areas.

    And how about the numbers of worshippers, members of the congregation, from

    the First War through to the Second?

    They stayed, looking at the membership rolls, the membership stayed fairly

    consistent during that period at about a hundred members because the area, there was

    not many new houses being built, especially during the Depression, there was

    basically no new housing, so if people left somebody else’d buy the property but

    there’d be very little change. The Church probably was a centre for people to gather

    and, as I say, it provided a cricket club, a tennis club, some of those things that

    enabled people to at least have some social outreach. And I’ve heard – not just

    related to this church but in general history – many people have written that the

    Church was, in a sense, their only place because they could go to church, be accepted,

  • 27

    there’d be a place for their children at Sunday school, there’d perhaps be a tennis

    club, a cricket club, and many churches ran gymnasiums so there was somewhere for

    young people, many teenagers I suppose who were unemployed. So in a sense the

    Church was a social – provided an outreach in those times.

    But Campbelltown was lucky in the sense that it had the support of Payneham and

    the people managed but the fact they had to cut off the telephone showed how tightly

    the budget was restrained. We can’t understand that today; I mean, if we haven’t got

    three telephones and fifteen power points in our house we think we’re poor, (laughs)

    don’t we?

    So at the end of World War II when this district was in transition from rural to

    suburban and agricultural land was turning into land for housing, what impact did

    that have on the numbers in the area and the members of the Church?

    The first real subdivision around started between 1950 and 1955. Most of the

    subdivision at that stage, early subdivisions were in Paradise and behind what is the

    Campbelltown Shopping Centre, through there, and a lot of it was built in by the then

    South Australian Housing Trust. That meant initially – and I remember looking at

    statistics – that between the 1950 and the 1955 Census the population of the area in

    fact went down by a few hundred because many of the gardeners started to move, sell

    up, subdivide and move out to Virginia, or some went down to McLaren Vale and

    some, of course, just retired.

    As the land became more valuable.

    As the land [became] more valuable for subdivision.

    And also rates were increased.

    I think the Campbelltown Council, from what I understand, always kept a rural rate;

    but the land became valuable – close to the city – and even down along James Street,

    which follows the creek, Third Creek, that was subdivided, and the Housing Trust

    built individual homes for sale through there and that was in about 1958 to 1960, and

    so the land was becoming valuable and that meant many families retired but many

    moved out and sometimes the sons went and worked elsewhere because they’d grown

    up and worked with their father on the garden and once the garden was sold the sons

    often went and worked in other jobs, some driving trucks or ran businesses. So there

  • 28

    was a social change, too, and I can think of one person I know, he was an only child,

    and his parents sold up and he became a teacher, schoolteacher, and worked with

    disabled children for the rest of his working life. Another friend of ours who we

    know very well, his father owned land and he was an only child: he went and worked

    for Woodroofe’s or somebody driving trucks because that’s where he was skilled,

    you know; he’d been a gardener. So it had some social changes. It meant that

    suddenly some of the members of the congregation I think who’d been very

    comfortable, because they’d had property, suddenly were very prosperous – trips to

    England and holiday houses, a whole group of them bought holiday houses at

    Aldinga Beach – and there were some very smart new Ford Customlines in the

    church car park. So I guess that had that change.

    But then of course the new people came in, like us – we were young marrieds with

    a new house and mortgage –

    Swelled the numbers.

    – and swelled the numbers. So there was a change. But that initial change in the ’50s

    meant that the congregation probably stayed fairly stagnant, but in fact the district

    went back in numbers, census numbers, only a few hundred but those few hundred

    while the subdivision was taking place and the new building.

    And then the numbers in the congregation doubled and trebled.

    Gradually trebled. And it got, I think at one stage, probably in about – be just before

    the hundred and twenty-fifth in 1980 and just before that – our membership was

    something like two hundred and fifty confirmed members. That also means that your

    actual attendance and involvement was higher because not everyone is a confirmed

    member of the Church and, as I say, there was sometimes up to four hundred children

    or more in the Sunday school.

    I notice that you mentioned the new hall and the Mothers’ and Babies’ clinic in the

    ’60s –

    Yes.

    – and that also in the ’60s there was a push to communicate with people via a

    Church magazine.

    Yes.

  • 29

    Can you tell me a little bit about that, did you look at those?

    Yes. They decided to create a quarterly magazine which they would send out to all.

    In those days, of course, you didn’t print them; you ran them off on a Gestetner. You

    typed them on a sheet and ran them off on a Gestetner, duplicated them, and they

    were put together and it was a way to sent out to the community to retain some of the

    history. In fact, I’ve got a set of four still home because for the first year it was

    launched my wife was the editor and she used to type the thing on a stencil and then

    it was run off on the local (laughs) duplicator at the church.

    Gestetner.

    Gestetner at the church. And they were topical about what groups were doing and

    every time she included a profile of one of the early members. Then, over the years,

    like most voluntary things, the magazine ceased and then it was picked up again; but

    certainly that was a way of communicating with people on the fringe and outside.

    And there were teens’ groups and couples’ groups and I think a modern morning

    service.

    Yes. They started – the Couples’ Club was formed mainly because there were so

    many young marrieds with young children and the idea was about every six or eight

    weeks on a Saturday night there’d be an event. You’d all take supper or go out

    somewhere and the idea was to allow people that opportunity to probably get

    Grandma to babysit because many times those days that was the only opportunity to

    get out. In the majority of cases, when the children were young in those days, most

    of the wives were still home and didn’t go back to professions or work till after the

    children went to school – some did but not many, because child care was not the

    norm in those days – and so it was an opportunity for people to get out and mix and

    do things. They did also attempt, for a while there was a modern service in the sense

    that they used guitars and modern music and they met in the hall generally because

    they found the formal layout of the church they saw as restrictive. But that lasted for

    a few years but it tended to – as certain people, I guess, who were the driving force

    moved somewhere else then it lapsed.

    So what was it like for you as a lay preacher during the time that you lived here?

    What were those years when you were a lay preacher?

  • 30

    Well, I would occasionally preach at Campbelltown but generally elsewhere, because

    we had a permanent minister and so the normal custom was that the permanent

    minister preaches and that the lay preachers assist if he’s on holidays, sick. And in

    those days we had about three others so there was about five of us, so you may get a

    chance once a year to lead the service; but generally you would go elsewhere.

    Did you look forward to those times when you could locally lead the service?

    Oh, yes, they were good times. Always when it’s in your own group it’s not the

    same, in the sense that I suppose you’re on more tenterhooks than perhaps if you go

    elsewhere. But they were good times in the sense that you could include other people

    and the whole congregation in what you were hoping to do.

    And this is in the 1970s, isn’t it?

    ’Seventies and ’80s, yes.

    ’Eighties. So you would go out to country areas.

    Yes.

    You mentioned Riverton. Is it the same now, does that process still take place?

    It happens – not for me, because I have other involvements; and I still have links and

    occasionally I go and preach at Payneham Road because they were the links of the

    old circuit, and if I chose to make myself available I could (laughs) just about every

    Sunday be preaching; but I’ve chosen not to because of other involvements. And

    things change.

    Yes. So between the period that ends this book –

    Yes.

    – From Darley to Campbell Town, so from 1982 until this year is another quarter of

    a century.

    Century, yes.

    So have you updated, are you writing something that follows on or could you tell

    me a little bit about the changes?

    Right. At this stage we’ve not written – or we’ve gathered some information but it’s

    not been documented. There’s been quite a few changes. I suppose the first change

  • 31

    was that in about 1995 the links that had been part of the Uniting Church, which was

    Dernancourt and Athelstone and Campbelltown, were broken and each church

    became a separate, single parish.

    Because the numbers were big enough?

    Yes; and also that’s a philosophy of the Uniting Church, albeit that I don’t agree with

    it, but the philosophy is that each church becomes independent. It doesn’t happen in

    the country because that’s financially not practical. And so Campbelltown then

    found itself on its own. Now, by then, most of the children of our children’s age

    group, the people that had arrived in the ’60s and the early ’70s, had grown up,

    married or moved away and so therefore the Sunday school we find ourselves from

    then onwards with a Sunday school of only thirty or forty children. Many people,

    some of the older members of the congregation, had started to retire and so therefore

    incomes were limited, and the numbers that worship had started to move down to

    perhaps a hundred and twenty, hundred and thirty. There were still things happening

    but that was part of the change because it’s reflected in the schools, that East Marden

    Primary School that got to nine hundred scholars is now only three hundred and fifty;

    Campbelltown Primary that was seventeen hundred is down to about seven hundred;

    Charles Campbell High School became the combination of Campbelltown High

    School and Charles Campbell, and in fact Campbelltown High School’s been sold off

    and is housing. So these changes were affecting the Church.

    Also many of us have chosen not to shift, so we’re still in the same house and

    probably will remain so until we go to a retirement village or whatever, so that means

    that, while the Church is still stable, the numbers, there’s not the young people

    coming in because the housing in this district hasn’t started to really turn over that

    first generation because most of the houses were built in the ’60s and ’70s, and once

    they start to turn over it will mean possibly that there’ll be new people come in; but

    whether they will relate to the Church in this different age is yet to be – – –. And the

    Church probably needs to be innovative to attract them. I’d say probably, as a

    congregation, our worship is still very traditional and so therefore not that much

    different than it was thirty-five years ago, except for the use of electronic overheads.

    But the actual format, with a choir and style, is not that much different, and so

    whether we will attract new people when that starts to happen I don’t know.

  • 32

    And families are having less children anyway.

    Yes, so therefore there’s less children: where probably most of our age group might

    have had two or three children, many are only having one or two. So things have

    changed a bit. There is – in the 1990s they adopted, set up a group called a ‘Drop-in’,

    and on Thursdays people from the community come in, they can play cards, they can

    just talk, they can play carpet bowls and they have morning tea and lunch, so that’s

    still an outreach; but that again, as the district’s changed, it’s still operating but not

    with the large numbers that it did when it started. I mean I’m not sure of how many

    they get now, but probably they’d get twenty or thirty whereas once they were getting

    fifty and sixty. Sometimes people are brought over, too, from the nursing home at

    North East Community Hospital, but only ones that can be in a wheelchair. So

    there’s those things happening. There’s still ladies’ fellowship groups; there’s

    nothing for men; but churches are noted never to generally have men’s groups much.

    A lot of the men in our congregation belong to Rotary and Probus. There is a group

    on Monday evenings that currently meets as a friendship, caring group and they do

    quilting, which of course is the fashion, and they attract about twenty-five to thirty

    people and over half of the ladies that come are not directly involved with the

    congregation; so that’s a small outreach.

    But we’re living in a different climate than we even were in the ’60s. When most

    of us arrived in the district we had come from churches – not all, but we’d come from

    churches and come with those links. Many people that did join our congregation

    necessarily didn’t have, perhaps, the long historic links that I had, but they’ve come

    and been involved and they found new friendship and – well, now, forty years, some

    of them – and they socialise and travel together and do things. But there’s not a lot of

    new people.

    Are you optimistic?

    Oh, yes. I think we need to probably be prepared to change, and that’s not easy even

    for somebody like me because I rather personally would be just as happy worshipping

    at St Peter’s Cathedral with the ritual as I would with modern drums. But when my

    sons were home they were part of a group that did that and it was important for them

    because you’ve got to – but now I’m free, I guess – well, not free now, but I’m older

    – I prefer, but I’m not sure that that will attract people.

  • 33

    The other thing that we’ve got to realise, I think, is – being optimistic – that

    Sunday is no longer the only day, perhaps, when we ought to hold – – –. We may

    have to think about a mid-week worship service, because some people have to work

    on Sundays. So the patterns are different, society is different, values are different. I

    think the basic structure is there and the care, but we’ve got to get people to – – –.

    And while the district – we’ve got to wait and see what’s going to happen with the

    district. I mean, many of the houses around us are being let to Sudanese people and

    that can be an outreach but, in my opinion – I’ll say my opinion – it can also be a

    problem, because I’ve got fairly strong views on that one (laughs) so I won’t express

    them.

    Well, tell me a little bit about yourself in the present.

    Yes.

    Any other publications that you might have written and works that you’re

    involved with, committees that you’re engaged with.

    Right. Well, as well for the Church history, the first one I wrote, which originally

    was in the form of a – – –. What was the Methodist Historical Society used to invite

    people each year to prepare what they called a lecture and you would speak on the

    subject, and mine was on Pirie Street Methodist Church in 1973. But then the

    manuscript was printed into a book. And then in 1981 I was invited by the

    Campbelltown people to write From Darley to Campbell Town, and then in 1983

    Spicer Memorial Church at St Peters celebrated its centenary and so I was asked to

    write their centenary history. So I suppose, as happens, once people know you do it

    (laughs) they’re on your doorstep.

    And then in 2006 I was invited to write a book which is a history of Epworth

    Building in Pirie Street, 33 Pirie Street. It’s a six-storey building alongside where

    Pirie Street Church used to stand.

    Art Deco.

    Yes. It was built in 1926.

    It’s a lovely building.

  • 34

    That was built by the Church and was owned by the Church until 2003, and so the

    Board asked me to write a history because it’s quite a unique story. It was built by

    the Church to provide accommodation for the Church officers and also income, and

    built on that site was the original parsonage of the Pirie Street Church. So there was

    those four histories.

    I’ve contributed over the years small segments to some of the district – Elizabeth

    Warburton, the well-known author, wrote a number of district, eastern suburban

    council histories. She wrote first Paddocks beneath2, the history of Burnside; St

    Peters3; and also of course the Campbelltown book From the river to the hills

    4, and I

    contributed small segments to her of Church history in those. And I’ve also written

    articles for the Uniting Church, we put out a quarterly magazine, so you may write a

    two- or three-page segment.

    I’m currently reviewing my history of Pirie Street because now we have more

    modern methods of producing photographs and texts, and so that will probably be

    reprinted; and I’ve done a fair bit, because I was the foundation president of the

    Campbelltown Historical Society when it was founded in 1987 as a result of

    Elizabeth Warburton’s book. The Mayor at the time, Max Amber, chose to form or

    we agreed to form a historical society and I was the president for the first five years,

    so I’ve had involvement in that.

    I’m just about due to formally retire and, as you indicated, I’m the archivist for the

    Uniting Church Synod, which is a retirement job or it’s a voluntary job but it’s

    something that I’ll enjoy. I serve as a board member of Uniting Care Adelaide East,

    which is one of the missions that used to be, was known as the Hackney Mission,

    early established, and I serve on that board. And I also serve on a trust called Spicer

    Cottages Trust, which is a trust that provides homes for – it’s a separate trust in its

    own right, under its own private act of parliament, established in 1897, which

    2 The paddocks beneath: a history of Burnside from the beginning, The Corporation of the City of

    Burnside, 1981.

    3 St Peters: a suburban town, The Corporation of St Peters, 1983.

    4 From the River to the Hills: Campbelltown, 150 Years, The Corporation of the City of Campbelltown,

    1986.

  • 35

    provides homes for widows and/or ministers of was the Methodist but now the

    Uniting Church, and I’ve served on that trust for thirty-five years.

    Where are those homes?

    We’ve got five in Payneham, five in Campbelltown over just off Arthur Street – it

    was called Finchley Park; it’s now Magill. We’ve got one at Felixstow and another

    one at Rostrevor. We’ve got altogether thirteen and we’re due to build another two

    very soon.

    They’re all new builds?

    Well, the original gift in 1897 was some very valuable property. In 1990 they were

    then getting not suitable so we sold eight and built fourteen new ones.

    Wonderful. You’ve mentioned some of the families who’ve been important to the

    Campbelltown history and the Campbelltown Methodist history in particular –

    Yes.

    – but I’m aware that we haven’t mentioned any of the ministers at Campbelltown

    who might have been important to remember, who’ve contributed in a big way. So

    would you like to just mention a few of those?

    Right. Because in the Methodist Church and ministers were appointed generally for

    an average of four-to-five-year terms, in the Uniting Church they’re called and they

    can stay up to ten years, it’s a different structure. But when we talked about some of

    the ministers, the first minister appointed, W.O. Harris, who came as a young man

    with these two twin girls I mentioned, he later went on to become President of the

    Methodist Conference and the Secretary of the Conference – in other words, we

    would call I guess in business a company secretary.

    Of course, in the early days, many of the ministers that were appointed to

    Campbelltown were younger because it was a country appointment. (laughs) Today

    it seems unusual to describe it as a ‘country’ appointment; but it was, really. Most of

    them were ministers who went on to serve in many other places. One particular one

    that I can think of, Reverend Clarrie Hore who came in 1966, he’d come from the

    country and he’d candidated for the ministry – during the War he worked for the

    Whyalla shipyards building frigates, and he candidated for the ministry and he came

    and he was a very special pastor, in the sense that he cared for people; and I’ve heard

  • 36

    people say that he’d go and visit you in the garden and if you were under the truck

    he’d get in under the truck to talk to you. And he was also the person that I guess

    was there when there was the change.

    How long was he here?

    He was here for five years, and he was the one that probably was just at that time

    when the real changes were really happening from gardening to suburbia.

    Then there was the Reverend Trevor Oates and the Reverend Ken Rofe, who were

    there in the ’60s and the ’70s when the growth, and they at that stage were

    responsible for three growing congregations: they used to look after Dernancourt,

    Athelstone and Campbelltown. That was a pretty big load when you had membership

    of two hundred and fifty at Campbelltown and growing, and same at Athelstone and

    Dernancourt which were new subdivisions then. And since union there’s been – they

    were there after union; but since the Uniting Church we’ve had longest, the Reverend

    Dr Joe Akehurst was here for nearly eight years.

    Sorry, I didn’t catch that.

    Akehurst, A-K-E-H-U-R-S-T. He was here for nearly eight years. And then Ken

    Wright who was before our current minister, he was with us for three years but then

    he went to Port Pirie because there was a particular need and nobody would take

    ministry in the country. People don’t seem to want to go and serve in the country any

    more. And our current minister, Gilles Ambler[?], has been with us five years.

    But there’s been – I guess W.O. Harris is the one that started off and went out to be

    – and another one in 1917 who was only here for one year, too, W.J. Bailey[?], he

    later went on to become the Director of the Methodist Young People’s Department.

    That’s an old-fashioned term, but he was responsible to look after the youth camps,

    and the Methodist Church owns Nunyara at Belair, which is a youth camp. He was

    responsible to buy that after the Second World War. And they also own Adare at

    Victor Harbor, which is a youth camp. And so he was one of the people that were

    very – later; when he would have been here in 1917 he would have only been a very

    young man, but he later went on to develop those unique campsites which are still

    used today and provide a very important outreach.

    Well, I think we’ve covered most of the territory.

  • 37

    Yes.

    Is there anything you can think of that I’ve missed asking you about?

    I think you’re right, that we’ve covered most of the territory. I see at the moment that

    whilst we’re still part of the community, as we’ve said, what the future holds depends

    a bit on the changes of the district and the moves, and I guess part of our ability to

    change.

    Well, thank you very much for this conversation today, Jim: it’s been very

    interesting, I appreciate it a lot. And this will be the end of the interview with Jim

    Everett on 3rd

    December 2007. The interviewer is Catherine Murphy and there’s

    only one file on this recording.

    END OF RECORDING.