selective harmonic elimination method of …jsa.ece.illinois.edu/epeps/papers/27.pdfselective...

3
Selective Harmonic Elimination Method of Radiation Noise from Automotive Wireless Power Transfer System Using Active Rectifier Hongseok Kim, Seungtaek Jeong, Dong-Hyun Kim, and Joungho Kim TeraByte Interconnection and Package Laboratory Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology Daejeon 305-701, Republic of Korea Email: [email protected] Young-Il Kim and In-Myoung Kim Enercons Co. Ltd. Seoul 153-802, Republic of Korea Email: [email protected] Abstract—Because wireless power transfer (WPT) systems used in automotive vehicles are likely to cause electromagnetic interference (EMI) with sensors, antennas, and controllers, the magnetic near-field spectrum from a WPT system has to be investigated and controlled properly. In this paper, we propose a selective harmonic elimination (SHE) method of the radiation noise from an automotive WPT system to reduce EMI caused by fast switching transitions of a resonant inverter and rectifier used for WPT systems. The simulated EMI spectra show that the significant reduction up to 30 dB in the harmonic components can be achieved by using the proposed SHE method. I. I NTRODUCTION The automotive wireless power transfer (WPT) technology using magnetic field coupling has been actively researched and developed until recently [1]–[4]. In automotive WPT systems, the magnetic flux leakage inevitably exists around the magnetically coupled coils due to relatively large air gap in between. The time-varying leakage magnetic field from a high- power WPT system increases the possibility of the potential noise issues related to the audio and radio systems because it consists of radio frequency (RF) spectral components with relatively high amplitudes as shown in Fig. 1. One major task in developing an automotive WPT system is to control its electromagnetic interference (EMI) while keeping its efficiency as high as possible. In many WPT applications, passive magnetic shielding structures are often used as a basic measure to reduce EMI and the resultant energy losses in adjacent conductors [2], [4]. However, the passive shielding technique has its limits due to the finite values of permeability and conductivity and design requirements such as weight and cost. A possible way to overcome such limits is to reduce or mitigate the harmonic noise at its source(s). Typical methods include the frequency dithering and phase- shift control methods [5]–[7]. In this paper, we propose a novel selective harmonic elimination (SHE) method of the radiation noise from an automotive WPT system to reduce possible EMI caused by high dv/dt of a resonant inverter and that of a rectifier. AM/FM Radio Receiver 500 kHz ~ 1.8 MHz (AM) 80 ~ 110 MHz (FM) Radio Signal 9k 100k 1M 10M 30M 20k Frequency (Hz) Typical EMI Spectrum Magnitude (dBµV) Harmonics Fundamental Transmitter (20 kHz / 85 kHz) - + Battery ~ = Leakage Magnetic Field AC 50/60Hz Fig. 1. A schematic of an automotive wireless power transfer system for electric vehicle battery charging and its typical EMI spectrum. The operating frequency can be either 20 kHz or 85 kHz, and relatively intense leakage magnetic field is produced around the magnetically coupled coils, containing the fundamental and harmonic components of the operating frequency of the transmitter. II. CONVENTIONAL AUTOMOTIVE WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER SYSTEM Fig. 2(a) shows the equivalent circuit model of the conven- tional automotive WPT system employing the series-series res- onance topology, and the class-D full-bridge inverter and rec- tifier [4]. The gate-control signals of the square-wave inverter and the simulated waveforms of the voltages and currents are shown in Fig. 2(b) and 2(c), respectively. ANSYS Simplorer is used for circuit simulation. The circuital parameters designated in Fig. 2(a) and used in simulations are tabulated in Table I, where the parameter values are taken from [4] and f r is the series resonance frequency (f r =1/ L 1 C 1 =1/ L 2 C 2 ). The Fourier series expansions of the voltages V AB and V CD shown in Fig. 2(c) are ideally written as V AB = V dc 4 π X n=1,3,5... 1 n sin (0 t) (1) V CD = V L 4 π X n=1,3,5... 1 n sin (0 t + ) (2)

Upload: vuonglien

Post on 02-May-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Selective Harmonic Elimination Method of RadiationNoise from Automotive Wireless Power Transfer

    System Using Active Rectifier

    Hongseok Kim, Seungtaek Jeong,Dong-Hyun Kim, and Joungho Kim

    TeraByte Interconnection and Package LaboratoryKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology

    Daejeon 305-701, Republic of KoreaEmail: [email protected]

    Young-Il Kim and In-Myoung KimEnercons Co. Ltd.

    Seoul 153-802, Republic of KoreaEmail: [email protected]

    AbstractBecause wireless power transfer (WPT) systemsused in automotive vehicles are likely to cause electromagneticinterference (EMI) with sensors, antennas, and controllers, themagnetic near-field spectrum from a WPT system has to beinvestigated and controlled properly. In this paper, we proposea selective harmonic elimination (SHE) method of the radiationnoise from an automotive WPT system to reduce EMI causedby fast switching transitions of a resonant inverter and rectifierused for WPT systems. The simulated EMI spectra show that thesignificant reduction up to 30 dB in the harmonic componentscan be achieved by using the proposed SHE method.

    I. INTRODUCTION

    The automotive wireless power transfer (WPT) technologyusing magnetic field coupling has been actively researchedand developed until recently [1][4]. In automotive WPTsystems, the magnetic flux leakage inevitably exists aroundthe magnetically coupled coils due to relatively large air gap inbetween. The time-varying leakage magnetic field from a high-power WPT system increases the possibility of the potentialnoise issues related to the audio and radio systems becauseit consists of radio frequency (RF) spectral components withrelatively high amplitudes as shown in Fig. 1.

    One major task in developing an automotive WPT systemis to control its electromagnetic interference (EMI) whilekeeping its efficiency as high as possible. In many WPTapplications, passive magnetic shielding structures are oftenused as a basic measure to reduce EMI and the resultant energylosses in adjacent conductors [2], [4]. However, the passiveshielding technique has its limits due to the finite values ofpermeability and conductivity and design requirements suchas weight and cost. A possible way to overcome such limitsis to reduce or mitigate the harmonic noise at its source(s).Typical methods include the frequency dithering and phase-shift control methods [5][7].

    In this paper, we propose a novel selective harmonicelimination (SHE) method of the radiation noise from anautomotive WPT system to reduce possible EMI caused byhigh dv/dt of a resonant inverter and that of a rectifier.

    TeraByte Interconnection and Package LaboratoryTERATeraByte Interconnection and Package Laboratory

    Human Safety and Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Issues of Automotive Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) SystemHuman Safety and Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Issues of Automotive Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) System

    AM/FM Radio Receiver500 kHz ~ 1.8 MHz (AM)

    80 ~ 110 MHz (FM)

    Radio Signal

    9k 100k 1M 10M 30M20k

    Frequency (Hz)

    Typical EMI Spectrum

    Mag

    nitu

    de(d

    BV

    )

    Harmonics

    FundamentalTransmitter

    (20 kHz / 85 kHz)

    -

    +

    Battery~ =

    LeakageMagnetic Field

    AC 50/60Hz

    Fig. 1. A schematic of an automotive wireless power transfer system forelectric vehicle battery charging and its typical EMI spectrum. The operatingfrequency can be either 20 kHz or 85 kHz, and relatively intense leakagemagnetic field is produced around the magnetically coupled coils, containingthe fundamental and harmonic components of the operating frequency of thetransmitter.

    II. CONVENTIONAL AUTOMOTIVE WIRELESS POWERTRANSFER SYSTEM

    Fig. 2(a) shows the equivalent circuit model of the conven-tional automotive WPT system employing the series-series res-onance topology, and the class-D full-bridge inverter and rec-tifier [4]. The gate-control signals of the square-wave inverterand the simulated waveforms of the voltages and currents areshown in Fig. 2(b) and 2(c), respectively. ANSYS Simplorer isused for circuit simulation. The circuital parameters designatedin Fig. 2(a) and used in simulations are tabulated in Table I,where the parameter values are taken from [4] and fr is theseries resonance frequency (fr = 1/

    L1C1 = 1/

    L2C2).

    The Fourier series expansions of the voltages VAB and VCDshown in Fig. 2(c) are ideally written as

    VAB = Vdc4

    n=1,3,5...

    1

    nsin (n0t) (1)

    VCD = VL4

    n=1,3,5...

    1

    nsin (n0t+ n) (2)

  • TeraByte Interconnection and Package LaboratoryTERATeraByte Interconnection and Package Laboratory

    2

    Conventional WPT System and Current Waveforms/SpectraConventional WPT System and Current Waveforms/Spectra

    sinsin /2

    Class-D Full Bridge Inverter(Square Wave Inverter)

    Class-D Full Bridge Rectifier

    C

    D

    Q3

    Q2

    A

    B

    Q4

    Q3p,ctrl

    Q2p,ctrlQ4p,ctrl

    Q1p,ctrl Q1

    D3

    D2D4

    D1D3

    D2D4

    D1

    (a)

    TeraByte Interconnection and Package LaboratoryTERATeraByte Interconnection and Package Laboratory

    3

    Conventional WPT System Using Square Wave InverterConventional WPT System Using Square Wave Inverter

    Control Signals of Inverter Switches

    Q1p,ctrl

    01

    2 3

    01

    2 3

    Q2p,ctrl

    Q4p,ctrl

    Q3p,ctrl

    01

    2 3

    01

    2 3

    (b)

    TeraByte Interconnection and Package LaboratoryTERATeraByte Interconnection and Package Laboratory

    4

    Verification of Proposed Control Method Using Simulation :Comparison of Time-domain WaveformsVerification of Proposed Control Method Using Simulation :Comparison of Time-domain Waveforms

    0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1-200

    -100

    0

    100

    200

    Time (ms)

    Volta

    ge (V

    )

    Voltage and Current Waveforms

    -20

    -10

    0

    10

    20C

    urre

    nt (A

    )

    (c)

    Fig. 2. A conventional WPT system, (a) An equivalent circuit model ofa conventional WPT system, (b) The gate-control signals of the invertergenerating the square wave voltage across the output terminals A and B, (c)The time-domain waveforms of inverter output voltage VAB, rectifier inputvoltage VCD, inverter output current ITx, and rectifier input current IRx. Fortransmitting 1-kW average power to the load, Vdc is set to be 104.3 V.

    TABLE I. CIRCUITAL PARAMETERS

    Parameter Value Parameter Value

    R1 = R2 90 m VL 150 V

    L1 = L2 682 H RL 22.5

    M 98 H Cf 680 F 4C1 = C2 92.85 nF fr 20 kHz

    where Vdc and VL are the dc source and load voltagesrespectively, 0 is the operating frequency of the inverter, and is the phase shift between VAB and VCD.

    Equations (1) and (2) clearly show that the voltage wave-forms contain a large amount of odd harmonics resulting inRF spectral contents of the radiation noise.

    III. PROPOSED AUTOMOTIVE WIRELESS POWERTRANSFER SYSTEM

    The radiation noise is proportional, within a geometricfactor, to the total ampere-turns of the coil currents as follows.

    ~H d~L = N1ITx +N2IRx (3)

    where N1 and N2 are the number of turns of the primary andsecondary coils, respectively, and ITx and IRx are the primary

    TeraByte Interconnection and Package LaboratoryTERATeraByte Interconnection and Package Laboratory

    5

    Phase-shift ControlledActive Rectifier

    C

    D

    D3p

    D2p

    A

    BD4p

    Q3p,ctrl

    Q2p,ctrlQ4p,ctrl

    Q1p,ctrl Q3p

    Q2pQ4p

    Q1p

    D1pQ3s,ctrl

    Q2s,ctrlQ4s,ctrl

    Q1s,ctrlQ3s

    Q2sQ4s

    Q1s

    D3s

    D2sD4s

    D1s

    Phase-shift Controlled Inverter(Modified Sine Wave Inverter)

    (a)

    TeraByte Interconnection and Package LaboratoryTERATeraByte Interconnection and Package Laboratory

    6

    Q1p,ctrl

    01

    01

    Q2p,ctrl

    2 3

    Q4p,ctrl

    01

    01

    Q3p,ctrl

    Control Signals of Inverter Switches

    (b)

    TeraByte Interconnection and Package LaboratoryTERATeraByte Interconnection and Package Laboratory

    7

    Q1s,ctrl

    01

    01

    Q2s,ctrl

    2 3

    Q4s,ctrl

    01

    01

    Q3s,ctrl

    2 3 4

    Control Signals of Rectifier Switches

    (c)

    TeraByte Interconnection and Package LaboratoryTERATeraByte Interconnection and Package Laboratory

    8

    Verification of Proposed Control Method Using Simulation :Comparison of Time-domain WaveformsVerification of Proposed Control Method Using Simulation :Comparison of Time-domain Waveforms

    0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1-200

    -100

    0

    100

    200

    Time (ms)

    Volta

    ge (V

    )

    Voltage and Current Waveforms

    -20

    -10

    0

    10

    20

    Cur

    rent

    (A)

    (d)

    Fig. 3. The proposed automotive WPT system employing active rectifier andthe proposed phase-shift control scheme, (a) An equivalent circuit diagram,(b) The gate-control signals of the inverter generating the modified sinewave voltage across the output terminals A and B, (c) The gate-controlsignals for the proposed phase-shift controlled active rectifier producing themodified sine wave voltage across the input terminals C and D, (d) The time-domain waveforms of the voltages and currents in the case of = 60. Fortransmitting 1-kW average power to the load, Vdc is set to be 136.6 V.

    and secondary coil currents, respectively.

    Equation (3) simply shows that a harmonics of magneticfield can be selectively eliminated only by getting rid ofthe corresponding harmonic components of both ITx and IRx.Given the coil structure, certain harmonic components of thecoil currents can be selectively eliminated by removing thecorresponding harmonic components of both VAB and VCD.

    To do so, we first propose a WPT system using the activerectifier and the phase-shift control in both the inverter and

  • rectifier as shown in Fig. 3. It is well known that certainharmonics of the inverter output voltage can be reduced oreliminated by using the phase-shift control method [8]. In thiscase, the output voltage spectral contents of the phase-shiftcontrolled inverter is

    VAB = Vdc4

    n=1,3,5...

    1

    nsin (n0t) cos

    (n2

    )(4)

    where is the phase shift between the switching of the twolegs of the inverter as shown in Fig. 3(b).

    If = 0, then (4) represents square wave voltage. Depend-ing on , the magnitudes of certain harmonic components ofVAB can be reduced to zero. However, the corresponding har-monic components of the magnetic field cannot be eliminatedunless the corresponding harmonic components of VCD are noteliminated simultaneously.

    To eliminate the harmonic currents by VCD, we apply thephase-shift control scheme with the same control variable as the inverter into the active full-bridge rectifier as shown inFig. 3(a) and 3(c). The Fourier series expansion of VCD of thephase-shift controlled rectifier is expressed as

    VCD = VL4

    n=1,3,5...

    1

    nsin (n0t+ n) cos

    (n2

    )(5)

    Fig. 3(d) shows the voltage and current waveforms of theproposed automotive WPT system with = 60 and thecircuital parameters shown in Table I. In this case, the thirdharmonic component and its odd multiples of the voltagesand currents are eliminated theoretically. To prevent the powerfactor from decreasing, the phase of VCD is synchronized withthat of IRx.

    To compare the radiation noise spectrum of the proposedWPT system with that of the conventional WPT system, weassumed N1 = N2 = N and normalized (3) as follows.

    ~H(f) d~LN |I(f0)|

    =ITx(f) + IRx(f)|I(f0)|

    (6)

    where I(f0) ITx(f0) + IRx(f0), and ITx(f0) and IRx(f0) arethe fundamental components of the primary and secondary coilcurrents in the conventional WPT system, respectively. Theright-hand side of (6) can be used to calculate the normalizedEMI spectrum of a WPT system without any electromagneticfield simulation. When calculating the normalized EMI spectra,the reference direction for the currents should be consideredcarefully.

    Fig. 4 shows the normalized EMI spectra of the conven-tional WPT system shown in Fig. 2 and of the proposed WPTsystem shown in Fig. 3. It should be noted that, by utilizing theproposed SHE method, the magnitudes of the third harmoniccomponent and its odd multiples are significantly reduced upto 29.8 dB, while the magnitude of the fundamental componentis almost the same as that of the conventional WPT system.

    IV. CONCLUSION

    This paper presents a novel SHE method of the radiationnoise from an automotive WPT system. We showed the gate-control signals of the inverter and rectifier needed for the im-plementation of the proposed SHE method, and presented the

    TeraByte Interconnection and Package LaboratoryTERATeraByte Interconnection and Package Laboratory

    Verification of Proposed Control Method Using Simulation :Comparison of EMI Spectra ( = /3 = 60)Verification of Proposed Control Method Using Simulation :Comparison of EMI Spectra ( = /3 = 60)

    Frequency (Hz)

    Mag

    nitu

    de (d

    B)

    10k 100k 1M 2M

    3rd harmonics

    9th 15th21st 27

    th = 540 kHz

    Normalized EMI Spectra

    - It is verified by simulation that the certain harmonics can be reduced significantly(eliminated theoretically) by using the proposed control method.

    -120

    -100

    -80

    -60

    -40

    -20

    0

    10Conventional WPT SystemProposed WPT System

    20 kHz

    - 29.8 dB

    Fig. 4. Comparison of the normalized peak EMI spectra from the conventionalWPT system and the proposed WPT system; The resolution bandwidths ofthe spectra are 200 Hz up to 150 kHz and 9 kHz from 150 kHz to 2 MHz.The magnitudes of the third harmonic component and its odd multiples aresignificantly reduced up to 29.8 dB.

    simulation results of the voltage, current, and the normalizedEMI spectrum for the case of = 60. The simulation resultsof the normalized EMI spectrum show that the significantreduction up to 29.8 dB in the harmonic components can beachieved using the proposed SHE method.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENT

    The authors would like to acknowledge the technicalsupport from ANSYS Korea (ANSYS, Inc.). This work wassupported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (No.2010-0028680).

    REFERENCES[1] R. W. Carlson and B. Normann, Test results of the PLUGLESSTM

    inductive charging system from Evatran Group, Inc. SAE InternationalJournal of Alternative Powertrains, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 6471, Apr. 2014.

    [2] G. Ombach, D. Kurschner, S. Mathar, and W. Chlebosz, Optimummagnetic solution for interoperable system for stationary wireless EVcharging, in Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER), 2015Tenth International Conference on. IEEE, 2015, pp. 18.

    [3] J. M. Miller, O. C. Onar, and M. Chinthavali, Primary-side power flowcontrol of wireless power transfer for electric vehicle charging, IEEETrans. Emerg. Sel. Topics Power Electron., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 147162,March 2015.

    [4] H. Kim, C. Song, D.-H. Kim, D. H. Jung, I.-M. Kim, Y.-I. Kim, J. Kim,S. Ahn, and J. Kim, Coil design and measurements of automotivemagnetic resonant wireless charging system for high-efficiency and lowmagnetic field leakage, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 64,no. 2, pp. 118, Jan. 2016.

    [5] J. Balcells, A. Santolaria, A. Orlandi, D. Gonzalez, and J. Gago, EMIreduction in switched power converters using frequency modulationtechniques, IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 569576, Aug 2005.

    [6] H. Kim, J. Kim, S. Jeong, S. Lee, Y. Cho, D. H. Kim, and J. Kim,EMI reduction in wireless power transfer system using spread spectrumfrequency dithering, in 2016 IEEE Wireless Power Transfer Conference(WPTC), May 2016, pp. 13.

    [7] J. A. Weldon, R. S. Narayanaswami, J. C. Rudell, L. Lin, M. Otsuka,S. Dedieu, L. Tee, K.-C. Tsai, C.-W. Lee, and P. R. Gray, A 1.75-GHz highly integrated narrow-band CMOS transmitter with harmonic-rejection mixers, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 20032015, Dec 2001.

    [8] M. H. Rashid, Power Electronics: Circuits, Devices, and Applications(International Edition), 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Pearson Education, Inc., 2004, pp. 258260.