s), re: new york city : nycal as be s to s litigation x ... canada inc. hereby request summary...

71
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK __“_____________1______ll______r________-------”-------------- X IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ELLA MAE ROBERTSON7 as Executrix for the Estate : of JIMMY C. ROBERTSON and ELLA MAE ______l__l___l_r-_--________________I___~--------------------- Index Nos. 102345/05 ROBERTSON, Individually, PB”””-’ ---- . \ : NO OPPOSITION : MOTION AND ORDER : Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, Plaintiff( s), : SUMMARY JUDGMENT -against- A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., : IASPart30 WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby: ORDERED, that -upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross -claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Dated: New York, New York 9-2s- Ic;l WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. By: ILE 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 264 West 40th Street New York, New York 1001 8 MAY 2 4 2010 (212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400 Dated: New York, New York i4M 14 2010 SO ORDERED:

Upload: vudien

Post on 08-Mar-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK __“_____________1______ll______r________-------”-------------- X IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X

ELLA MAE ROBERTSON7 as Executrix for the Estate : of JIMMY C. ROBERTSON and ELLA MAE

______l__l___l_r-_--________________I___~---------------------

Index Nos. 102345/05

ROBERTSON, Individually, PB”””-’ ---- . \ : NO OPPOSITION

: MOTION AND ORDER

: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,

Plaintiff( s), : SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., : IASPart30

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that -upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross -claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York 9 - 2 s - Ic;l

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.

By:

I L E 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

264 West 40th Street New York, New York 1001 8 MAY 2 4 2010 (212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York i4M 14 2010

SO ORDERED:

Page 2: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

' TMc:CCCjpkj 2/81 I 0

SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, d 117398/02 i ASSIGNED TO:

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

EUGENE O'BRIEN

I HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER I 1 NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY 1 JUDGMENT MOTION AND

i ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: NewkYork,jNew York

zzziz; mi, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 5

RICHARD W. BABINECZ, ESQ.

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

Attorney for \b efendant

SO ORDERED:

Our File No S-4402-07

Page 3: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

TMc:CC(jpk)' 3/30/10

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

JOSEPH PALMESE I NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY i JUDGMENT MOTION AND i ORDER I

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Ne York, ew York + .I;. 1

.hlcCann, Esq. W. BABINECZ, ESQ.

BH asq. / r r c & & d ~ M / 1 \ WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

SO ORDERED:

Our File No S-4130-98

Page 4: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

X /cases/FBW30274/legallNOSJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK 1____________~1_1~1~_-------~------111~~~~~~~~~~"~----------1- X IndexNo.: 1052G!-W& - -

THOMAS J. CRUGER, SR., 102783/00 & _- - _r

Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

-against- ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

$32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, .-

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs, " \ \ % a h a

/-'

Esq.

4 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff

180 Maiden Lane Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

+?k New York, New York 1003 8 (212) 558-5500

2 Rector Street, 14" Floor New York, New York 1000&

f7 (212) 313-3600

-.. "5; .,<p SO ORDEMD, Hon. Sherry Kleinxeitler $-

. .. . . . . . .. . - . . . . - . ...

Page 5: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

TMcCCipk) '

3/30/10

3

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

NICHOLAS SANTORA

I : NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY / JUDGMENT MOTION AND I ORDER

I

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100

Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

SO ORDERED:

Our File No

\yA'( 1 4 2010 S-4166-98

Page 6: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. & S., NC.

1 1 103 1/98 6 102783/00 & -.. ." ---- 121743/97 'A, -- -I--

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

NYCAL 1.A.S. PSI? 30

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

$32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs. q\>x\\o

4 0, Attorneys for Plaintiff

180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500

Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14" FI New York, New York (212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED,

Page 7: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

"against-

Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

$32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, -;$

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

.. . , .

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs. 4\SB\\O

I'

Frank Ortiz, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500

Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor . New York, New York 1000

r* + ,? (212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED, --%

Hon. Sherry Klein-%eitler

Page 8: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

Plaintiff,

-against- : NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER

A. C. & S., INC.,et&,

Defendants. X ________________-I--___________r________----------"--------------

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and

Goodyear Canada Inc. (together, "Goodyear") hereby request summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Goodyear

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Goodyear be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

WEITZ & LUkENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

New York, New York 100 (212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.SlC.

MAY 2 4 2010

MEW YORK WUIVT/ CERK'S OFFICE

Page 9: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

Plaintiff( s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC.

Defendant( s).

Index No.: 10 1 176/99

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

NYCAL I . A S Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

$321 2, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs. L\\ r.a\\o

- Frank Ortiz, Esq. Halbardier, Esq.

& MOORE2 Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500

Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14fh Floor New York, New York 10006

SO ORDERED,

NAY 14

Page 10: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

TMc:CCCjpk) 3/24/10

SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION,

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

LESTER KNOPP

INDEX NO. 103373/99 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc,, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York Y/w /w 0

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

Consolidated Edison Cor&hy of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003%$8

0 SO ORDERED:

pile No '-99 3'IA'f P 4 2010

Page 11: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc, hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York q-x5-r. IO

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.

By:

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

264 West 40th Street New York, New York 1001 8

(212) 558-5500 (2 12) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED: V

Hon. Sherry Klein Heijer, J.S.C.

Page 12: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

: NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs,

-against- : Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, : IASPart30 A.C. & S., INC.,gtd.,

Defendants . t f ................................................................

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York &--&-ID

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C, Attorneys for Plaintiffs

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

Dated: New York, New York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &

c

0 2aia

New York, New York 1OO#r 2 (2 12) 302-2400

SO ORDERED: * MAY 1 4 2010 Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.

Page 13: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

-against-

A. C. & S, INC., et al.,

Index NOS.&HV~W+J u2&wQ&

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Sheny Klein Heitler, IAS Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Lnc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff

By:

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

264 West 40' Street

(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.

PAY 14 EM@\

Page 14: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

Plaintiff( s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC.

Index No.: 107913199

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

$32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs. c"

- -_

'1 A r, Esq. N & MOORE

Frank C

prejudice and without costs. c

-_ Frank Ortiz, Esq. Halbardier, E<. WEITZ & LUXENBER Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500

BARRY, MCTIERNAN & MOORE Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor New York, New York 10006 (212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED, SO ORDERED,- Hon.

Page 15: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

i

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

WHEREFOKE, defendant A. Q, Smith Water Products Company hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant A, 0. Smith Water Products Company-

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant A, 0. Smith Water Products Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs,

New YO , New York Y b D ,2009 Dated:

. . . -.----- .

Matthew McIntyre, Esq. / Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

e He16 Antoniou Mcbo&an, Esq. McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP Attorneys for Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

Page 16: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION

CHARLES E. MACK, JR., : Index No. 109747/99

: NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARYJUDGMENT

Plaintiff,

-against- : MOTION AND ORDER

: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, : IASPart30 A.C. & S., INC., gt d.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled caae, pursuaut to

I

I CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and aoodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all ca-defendants, all claims and cross claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Lnc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York 5-+ - l O

WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyoar Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.

7 By:

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

264 West 40th Street New York, New York 10018

(212) 558-5500 (2 12) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York I

SO ORDERZD:

I I

Page 17: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

ARNOLD JOHNSON, Personal Representative for the Estate of XAVIER PRANCKEVICUS,

:

Plaintiff,

-against-

A, C. & S., INC., @ &,

: Index No 14-1 0444.8 7 1 10954/99"" --

: NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants.

Goodyear Canada Inc. (together, "Goodyear") hereby request summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 321 2, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against Goodyear

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against ...

Goodyear be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Yo k New * WEITZ & LUkENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants

Jason Kaufman, Esq.

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

2 6 4 West 40th Street New York, New York 100 18

(212) 302-2400 F I L Dated: New York, New York

MAY 2 4 2010

SO ORDERED: T

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.SlC.

Page 18: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

X. :/cases/FBW37X2X/legal/NOSJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW Y O N

DONALD SAWYER, X ................................................................

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC.

Index No,: 1 1 1 152/99

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

summary judgment in .the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

$32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500

FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14fh Floor New York, New York 10006 (212) 313-3600 _ -

e SO ORDERED,

i i i z o t o 4 I I

\

Page 19: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION,

ALAN EDWARD PAUZE

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ " _

INDEX NO. 113354199 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

I \

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

" T i m o g .h/lcCann, Esq. RICH W. BABINECZ, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY

D a x y R. Kraft, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

SO ORDERED:

Our Pile No S-654 1-99

1 1

Page 20: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. & S,, INC.

Index No.: 1 15029/99

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

$32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038

Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor

(212) 558-5500 New York, New York 10006 (212) 313Z36QO

SO ORDERED,

MAY 14 2010

Page 21: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

Plaintiff( s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

532 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

Frank Ortiz, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500

Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14* Floor New York, New York 10006

Page 22: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

TMc:CCGpk) 3/30/10 3

S U P E M E COURT : ALL COUNTIES

IN RE NEW Y O U CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIOI$ "

..._______

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

JOSEPH PALMESE

HON. SHERRY KLElN HEITLER

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 321 2, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant :$2onsolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are: I hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs. '4

/" Timot cCann, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadwav

RICH%.$ BABINECZ, ESQ, Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New . . .

New York, NY 100035 York. Inc. 4 Irving Place New York,eY

.I 2 4 lQIQ SO ORDERED: \

Our File No S-4 130-98

20 10

Page 23: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Tire &

Inc.

By : Daniel Blouin, Esq.

New York, New York 100 18 264 West 40th Street 700 Broadway

New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

c?AY 14 2010

. ..

Page 24: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C, & S., INC.

Index No.: 100592/00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

$32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14'h Floor

1 SO Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038

P 4 %QlQ

(212) 558-5500 New York, New York 10006 (212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED, f ' *b-- 'k

MAY I 4 2UlU

Page 25: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

4.C and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG ZONTRACTING AND SUPPLY), et al.,

WHEREFORIE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

OWERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be arid the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice mnd without costs.

Dated: New York, New York Atxi1 19.2010

,4AR ON SON FEINSTEIN & DEUTSC'H, LLP Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Compan 757 Third Avenue dp ~ e w York, N ~ W York 100% 201B

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 Counsel for: WILLIAM 'I. FRANKLIN and ANNE I,. FRANKLIN

. .. .. . . _

Page 26: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

TMc:CCCjpk) 3/30/10

SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, .. "-"_--.--____"____---------"------.--.....-.-------~-----------.......-.

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

NICHOLAS SANTORA

Our File No $4166-98

AS SIGNED-TG: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there .being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby .-

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New Yor New York r l , Q ~ W O

Danny R. Kraft, Esq. WEITZ & LUXEN Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100

Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New

4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

SO OFXIERED:

Page 27: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC.

Index No.: 10

121743/97

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

NYCAL I._k,.s. ?El? 30

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

532 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

+\st? \ \o /-

Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500

Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor New York, New York 1000

I 4

1' *I ^ "

(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED,

MAY 1 4 2010

Page 28: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

Index No.: 103534/00

VINCENT S. PATTNOSH and ANNA PATTNOSH, his wife

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER ____________.___...-

WHEREFOm, defendant Flowserve US, Inc., solely as successor to Edward Valves,

Tnc., (improperly sued as Edward Vogt Valve Company, Individually and as successor to

Edwards Valves, Inc.), ((LFlowserve US") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant Flowserve US with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Flowserve US be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York +./ (97 ,2010

Pamela R. Gold-Zafra, Esq.- Attorneys for Plaintiffs Wilentz, Goldrnan & Spitzer 1 10 William Street, 26th Floor New York. NY 10038

McElroy, Dhtsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP Attorneys for Defendant Flowserve US, Inc., solely as successor to Edward Valves, Inc. 88 Pine Street, 241h Floor New York, New York 10005

FILED SO ORDERED,

I42 1472-1

Page 29: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

x : / x ~ - 3 9 4 3 a n ~ ~ o s Jn;l

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFX COUNTY OF NEW YORK

Plaintiff( s),

- against -

ABB LUMMUS CREST, INC., et al.;

NO OPPOSITION SUMMUY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Index No.: 103784/00

NYCAL I ! I.A.S. Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL fMa UTICA BOILER hereby

request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL fMa

UTICA BOILER with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL W a UTICA BOILER, be and the same are hereby

dismissed ith prejudice and without costs.

5h/b

Pamela R, Gold-Zafra,Esy LJ Attorney for Plaintiffs Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer 11 0 William Street New York, New York 10038

SO ORDERED,

. .

Nicole Pitti,Esq. Attorneys for ECR INTERNATIONAL fMa UTICA BOILER Barry McTiernan & Moore 2 Rector Street, 14* Floor New York, New York 10006 (212) 313-3600

EiAY 2 4 2010

Page 30: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York /o

XENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff

By: aniel Blouin, Esq.

F"Ce, 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

264 West 40th Street New York, New York 1001 8

(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400

4 2018 M Y

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.

. . . -

Page 31: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

TMc:CCCjpk) 3/30/10

SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW Y O N

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONj 0 ___I_....._......... ____________________--"-..............~.~~-----"------

'ANDEX No.

i HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

1 121 27'0O-and 08387/00 i il AqSIGNED TO: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ................................................................

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: i

JOHN MICHAEL MALLON ' NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

j ORDER I

1 i JUDGMENT MOTION AND

3

I

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York,]pc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs. !

Dated: New york, Vew York

Msrtthew MacIntyre, E$. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

R I C H A ~ D w. BABINECZ, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

Page 32: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

G W

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

$321 2, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, " A >

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

d without costs. "

---I--

%5( M. Halbardier, Esq. BARRY, MCTIERNAN & MOORE Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14fh Floor New York, New York 10006

Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500

Page 33: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

.- 7 TMc:CCGpk)

3/30/10

SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION/I 112127JNKand 108387/00

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

JOHN MICHAEL MALLON i NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY I JUDGMENT MOTION AND

! ORDER

3

i

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs,

Dated: New ork, ew York

~~~~

/

Matthew MacIntyre, E&. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 5

RICHA~D w. BABINECZ, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

S-8040-00

Page 34: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

Plaintiff(s)

-against-

A.C & S. INC. et al.

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS, hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS , with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

. Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Attorney for the Attorneys for Defendant

WEXTZ & LUXENB

700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED,

FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14th floor New York. NY 10006 (212) 313-3600

Page 35: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)

Plaintiff( s), lndex N H 0-00; 1 10269?-eL>- I

---€WO?%-03

(Deceased)

vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et a]., : NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY

I : JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants. I

X ______________-_-I______________________-----------------

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing I

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no I

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

a T & * / L Matthew T. MacIntyre, I&. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

CI

Nid1b-M. Kozin, Esq. K&L GATES LLP Attorneys for Defendant CRANE CO.

Newark, NJ 071 02-5252 One Newark Center,

2 4 2010 (973) 848-4000

SO ORDERED, E- Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

NW-332420 V I NAY 1 4 2010

Page 36: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

DANIEL KELLY and MARGARET KELLY,

Plaintiffs, -against-

A. C. &S., INC., gal.,

Defendants.

119400/00 _I 7 Index L /"--- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler IAS Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CPLR

32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is

hereby: ~

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims asserted

against defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same hereby are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York APRIL zq ,2010

WEITZ & LUXENE$F>RG, P p , LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP 7 1 2

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

700 Broadway New York, New York 10038

Dated: New York, New York

(212) 558-5500

and Goodyear Canada Inc.

264 West 40th Street New York, New York 1001 8 (212) 302-2400 '4' 2 4 2010

SO ORDERED: m Hon. Sherry Klein Heitier, J.S.C. MAY 1 4 2010

Page 37: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFX COUNTY OF NEW YORK

Matthew McIntyre, Esq. / Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003

WHEREFORE, defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company hereby requests

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP Attorneys for Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross cIaims against

defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated:

SO ORDERED,

1344397-1

Page 38: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK _""r_____________"_______l_____r_____l____------__-------_---- X rN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

_____I______________r________l_______r_l---"___~----r_-~------ X STELLA O'KREPA, Individually and as Executrix : for the Estate of MICHAEL O'KREPA, SR.,

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

Index No. 123075/00

: NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER

Plaintiff( s),

-against- : Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,

A. C. & S . INC., gt d. IASPart30

3 I

!

!

i WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York MrS

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.

By:

264 West 40fh Street New York, New York 1001 8

Scott A. Harford, Esq.

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 (2 12) 302-2400 F I L E D Dated: New York, New York NAY z 4 zaio,

NEW YO SO ORDERED:

MAY k 4 2010

Page 39: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

vs.

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., : NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY : JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Defendants. X _____II_________________________111_____"----------------

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing , _ ,

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, I

K&L GATES LLP Attorneys for Defendant CRANE CO. One Newark Center, Newark. NJ 07 102-5252 (973) 848-4000

- 1 A A (973) 848-4000

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

NW-332420 V I

Page 40: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

< SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK w 2OUNTY OF NEW YORK

[N RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL .___II_______________rr______lll________--------------------"------ X

ASBESTOS LITIGATION _________I___________I__________________-------------"~------"-"--- X

This Document Relates To:

EUGENE DEGANNES and JACQUELINE DEGANNES

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION ON

BEHALF OF FORD MOTOR COMPANY

Index No.: 103007/01 Plaintiff(s), :

I against - L

A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTTNG AND SUPPLY), et al.,

WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

a ainst &ice

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims defendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismi and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York April 19, 20 10

By: ~ Frank Ortiz, Esq.

my 2 Q 2014

Justin M. Kasrnir, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.w 700 Broadway & DEUTSCH, LLP New York, New York 10003 ' Attorneys for Defendant Counsel for: EUGENE DEGANNES and Ford Motor Company JACQUELINE DEGANNES 757 Third Avenue

New York, New York 100 17

P AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN

T: 2 12-593 1822 F: 212-593-6970

SO ORDERED:

{ 008H469.DOC }

Page 41: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

X:cases\FHW422 I6\legal\NOSJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

1-

FRANK SCHULTE,

Plaintiff(s)

/-"-> Index {lo69770 /*' 1, J1937WOO &

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

100779,03 "4 **.. --__+-J

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS, hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS , with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

4 \ M3\\Q

ia Malikzay, Esq. arry, McTiernan & Moore

FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14th floor New York, NY 10006

WEITZ & LUXENB Attorney for the plai 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant New York, NY 10003

F I L E D (212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED, MAY 2 4 20@

Page 42: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

CHARLES BERENGER and MARGARET BERENGER, : I.A.S. Part 30

: NYCAL

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)

: Index No(s).: 107025-01 Plaintiff(s),

-against- : NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY

A.C. & S., INC., et al., : JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated:

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

599 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212) 536-3900

SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry €&in Heitler

Page 43: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

A.C. & S., INC., et al.,

NYCAL

Index No. 108564/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, IAS Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York .1\ &\\\e

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. n

Scott A. Harford, Esq. By: v-%oa By:

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.

264 West 40* Street New York, New York 10018

(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400 MAY 2 4 2014

Dated: New York, New York

i l i \ r A4 2010 SO ORDERED:

.. . - . . . ... .- . . . .. - .. . -

Page 44: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

JYCAL

ANNIE WARD, as Executrix for the Estate of J.D. WARD,

: Index No. 109480/03

-against-

Plaintiff( s), : NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goohjear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York L - i \ %\ \ lo

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.

By: By:

F I L E D Scott A. Harford, Esq.

264 West 40th Street

Frank M. Ortiz, Es

700 Broadway

MAY 2 4 2010 New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 1001 8 (212) 558-5500 (2 1 2) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:

Page 45: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL X ________r_r_r___________________________------________________

ASBESTOS LITIGATION X

DIANA Y. WRIGHT, Individually and as Executrix for : the Estate of PHILLIP L. WRIGHT,

.............................................................. Index No. 109598/01

Plaintiff(s), : NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- : MOTION AND ORDER

A.C. & $. INC., et al., : Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,

X Defendants. : IASPart30

______________"__I__I_______________________-____-----------"

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York v -zy - I \s

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.

By:

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003

264 West 40* Street New York, New York 100 18

MAY 2 4 2010 (212) 558-5500 (2 12) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED: Hon. Sherry Kleh Heitler, J.S.C.

Page 46: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

-against-

A.C. & S . INC., et al.,

Defendants.

iY CA

Index No. 109770/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, IAS Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire L Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York 4\ h \ \ O

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff - By: % Frank M. Ortiz,

700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.

By: - g

264 West 40"' Street New York, New York 10018

Scott A. Harford, Esq.

FILED (212) 302-2400

MAY 2 4 2010 Dated: New York, New York

NEW YORK WUMy GLERK'S OFFICF

SO ORDERED:

Page 47: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Plaintiff( s),

-against-

A.C. & S . INC., et al.,

NYCAL

Index No. 110164/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, IAS Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York 4-1.5- 1 0

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.

By: : Scott A. Harford, Esq,

4.p 700 Broadway 264 West 40* Street I L q ) New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10018 (212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400 20744

Dated: New York, New York *Q$Q&

9p31=F SO ORDERED:

ViAY 14 201Q

Page 48: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

I 1

Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND

-against- ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

$321 2, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, I 4

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims agaiht

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs. 4 \ 2-8 h

~

Frank Ortiz, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant 180 Maiden Lane I FULTON BOILER WORKS New York, New York 10038 2 Rector Street, 14fh Floor (212) 558-5500 New York, New York 10006

(212) 313-3600 --

SO ORDERED,- H

Page 49: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC.

&-ITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

$32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs. v\\ a- b.\ L o

albardier, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14fh Floor

180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038

(212) 558-5500 New York, New York 10006 !LED 8 y 2 4 2010

12) 313-3600

bb. SO ORDERED,

Page 50: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

4..

TMc:CC(jpk) 12/3/09

IN RE NEW YOFX CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, 11 1867/01 I ASSIGNED TO: i HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER

1 NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY i JUDGMENT MOTION AND ! ORDER

__.._...__..___ " _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - " - - - - " - - - - . . ~ ~ . - - . - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ! NICHOLAS DELFINO

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby

!

I

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035

4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

SO ORDERED:

Our File No S-6 149-0 1

Page 51: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

Plaintiff( s), : NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT

-against- : MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York . Z \ L \ \ \ O

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. A

Frank M. Ortiz, Esq

700 Broadway 264 West 40th Street New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 1001 8 (212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400 my 2 4 2010

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED: AUY 14 2010

Page 52: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.C. & S., INC.

& 111231/01

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

$321 2, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs. 4\33 \ \p

Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 1003 8 (212) 558-5500

Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor New York, New York 10006 (212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED,

Page 53: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

X. :/cases/FBW443549/legal/NOSJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

-----___---_r_"_------------------------------------------------ X I n d ~ ~ 4 / 0 1 JOHN EPP,

cowry OF NEW YORK

,J /& 12 1854/0 1

Plaintiff(s), - .- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY ,/' >//'

JUDGMENT MOTION AND -against- ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

$32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, '* ' Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs. 4 b $/ LG

Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 1003 8

Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14'h Floor New York, New York 1 0 0 0 6 ~

> ! D $&**~ (212) 558-5500

12) 313-3600

, t 4.j 2 4 mQ I T

SO ORDERED,

Page 54: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

TMc:CCCjpk) 21811 0

SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK .__ " _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ " _ " --......~.....- " " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . - . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .

lN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, I _____...........~-_- ~ " - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - ........-...-.~-- "-~"----------------..

HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

EUGENE O'BRIEN JUDGMENT MOTION AND I NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY

ORJIER

WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison

Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims

against defendant Consolidated Edidon Company of New York? Inc., be and the same are .hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

-9 I

Dated: New/York,flew York

700 Broadway New York, NY 100035 York, Inc.

4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598

SO ORDERED:

Our File No I S-4402-07

'! 2010

Page 55: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

JN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

JAMES MCKENNA : I.A.S. Part 30 (Deceased)

X - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - - - - - -

: NYCAL

: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)

Plaintiff(s), Index Nn *,+l-lX&~-flO:

vs . i C 4 E e - J A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., : NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY

: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER Defendants.

X ----"_11_1"11________--1--1--~---1------------------

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant * to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO, with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Matthew T. MacIntyre, gsq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500

%& k+b+ Ni 1 , Kozin, Esq. K&L GATES LLP Attorneys for Defendant CRANE CO. One Newark Center, Tent Newark, NJ 07102-5252 (973) 848-4000

SO ORDERED, * Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler

I

Page 56: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

6.: 106977/01, lp*19379/O0 & * Plaintiff( s)

-against-

- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS, hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS , with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to d l co-defendants, all. claims and cross claims against

defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

md without costs.

q \ &8\\0

WEITZ & LUXENB Attorney for the plai 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant Yew York, NY 10003

ia Malikzay, Esq.

FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14" floor New York, NY 10006

I D (212) 313-3600

30 ORDERED, MAY 2 4 2010

Page 57: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

-against- .Index No.: 11 1930/03

A. W. CHESTERTON CO., et al.,

Defendant(s). :

WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York April 28,2010

--b By: Brian Early, Esq. EARLY & STRAUSS LLC 360 Lexington Ave. New York, New York 10017 Attorneys for Louis Desisto

FEINSTEIN &

Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Company 757 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017 T: 212-593-6700 F: 212-593-6970

SO ORDERED:

{ 00863032.

Page 58: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

e SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,,

NYCAL

NO OPPOSITIO3 SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, IAS Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear

Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the

same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York 4-29- w

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.

B By:

700 Broadway 264 West 40* Street New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10018 MAY 2 4 2010 (212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:

Page 59: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

Plaintif&),

- against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.;

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Index No.: 190023/08

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL E/k/a UTICA BOILERS, INC.

hereby request summary judgment in the abovsentitled case, pwsuant to Civil Practice Law and

Rules Section 321 2, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL

W a UTICA BOILER, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL U'Wa UTICA BOILERS, INC., be and the same are: hereby

dismissed w'tli prejudice and without costs.

5/$0 /-2pJ

Patti Burshtyn,Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs TIONAL EIWa Weitz & Luxenberg 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038

UTICA BOILERS, INC. Barry McTieman & Moore 2 Rector Street, 14'h Floor New York, New York 10006

- F ' L E ~ (212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED, h,4y 4 2070

Page 60: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

Plaintiff@),

- against - AD, SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et ale;

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

Index No.: 190023/08

NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request summary

judgment iii the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims agaitlst

defendants FULTON BOILER WOKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and wit o costs. 5$flO

Attorney for Plaintiffs Weitz & Luxenberg 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038

Attorneys for FULTON BOILER WORKS Barry McTiernan & Moore 2 Rector Street, 14" Floor New York, New York 10006 (212) 313-3600

so QICDEWD,

Page 61: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

' ,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

- against - Index No.: 190092/09

A.W. C'HESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,

Defendant(s). :

WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and thcre being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York April 26, 2010

~.

By: Frank Ortiz, Esq.

700 Broadway DEUTSCH, LLP New York, New York 10003 Attorneys for JAMES V. LYNCH and MARY LYNCl1 757 Third Avenue

Attorneys for Defendant FORD MOTOR C O M m

New York, New York 10017 T: 2 12-593-6700

SO OIUIERED:

MAY 14 2010 {oos62151 rloc j *

I

Y

I

Page 62: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

04/15120fb 13-:34 FAX 2 1 2 986 2255 E A R L Y S T R A U S S

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YBRK COUNTY OF NEW VQRK

MFEIIEREFORE, defondant, Frick Company! lrnpropsrly pied as York International

hrparation (Individually and as $uccessor to Wick Company). licrobv ~ E ~ L J E S ~ S stimma:'y

.idgment j i '~ The ahoveaititlecl case, pursuant tc;~ Civil Practice Law ;:tnd Rules Secticm 321 2

nternertiona! Cnrpwstion (Individually and as SCLEC~SSDT to Frick Company). with

3 ORDERED: ................................ ~ ................. Horiota ble

MAY 14 2818

i

I

I

I ~

!

!

~

I

!

i

Page 63: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

< L

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

HELENA CAMPBELL, being duly sworn deposes and says I am an employee of Hoagland, Longo

\/loran, Dunst & Doukas, LLP, the attorneys for Defendants, Frick Company, improperly pled as Yor€

nternational Corporation (Individually and as Successor to Frick Company).

That on the &%ay of April, 2010 a copy of the within No Opposition Motions for Summar)

Judgment were mailed, via first class to: Derell Wilson, Esq., Early, Ludwick, Sweeney & Straws, 36C

Lexington Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10017 and one copy to the following attorneys on the

attached service list by first-class mail, postage prepaid.

I hereby certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true. I am aware that if any of the

foregoing statements made by me are willfully false, I am subject to punishment.

SERVICE RIDER

Robert C. Malaby, Esq. Malaby & Bradley, LLC 150 Broadway, Suite 600 Vew York, NY 10038

tulie Evans, Esq. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker 150 East 42nd Street \Jew York, NY 10017-5639

.ohn J. Kot, Esq. Naters, McPherson & McNeill 100 Lighting Way - 7th Floor '0 Box 1560 kcaucus, NJ 07096

oseph 1. Ortego, Esq. Jixon Peabody, LLP 0 Jericho Quadrangle - Suite 300 ericho, NY 1 1753-2728

Page 64: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

Thomas M. Beneventano, Esq. LaSorsa & Beneventano 3 Barker Avenue, #70 White Plains, NY 10601

Judith Yavitz, Esq. Reed Smith, LLP 599 Lexington Avenue, 26th Floor New York, NY 10022

Charles M. McGivney, Esq. McGivney & Kluger, PC 80 Broad Street, 23rd Floor New York, NY I0004

Frank A. Cecere, Jr., Esq. Ahmuty, Demers & McManus 200 I.U. Willets Road Albertson, NY 11507

Yvette Harmon, Esq. McGuire Woods, LLP - NY 1345 Avenue of the Americas, 7th F1. New York, NY 10105-0106

Arthur D. Bromberg, Esq. Weiner Lesniak LLP 629 Parsippany Road PO Box 438 Parsippany, NJ 07054-0438

Steven A. Weiner, Esq. 3'Toole Fernandez Weiner Van Lieu, LLC 50 Pompton Avenue Verona, NJ 07044

Vlonakee Griffin, Esq. llcGivney & Kluger, PC 30 Broad Street, 23rd Floor Vew York. NY 10004

]avid H. Arnsten, Esq. Magher , Gosseen, Faller & Crowley 1010 Franklin Ave, Suite 400 2arden City, NY 11530

l

I

!

! i

I

! 1

! I I

!

1

I

i

I I j

i

i

~

!

I

~

j

i ! ~

i

Page 65: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

< L

Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP One Newark Center, 10th Floor Newark, NJ 07 102

James R. Lynch, Esq. Lynch Daskal Emery, LLP 264 West 40th Street New York, NY 10018

Joan Gaisor, Esq. McGivney & Kluger, PC 80 Broad Street, 23rd Floor New York, NY 10004

Suzanne Halbardier, Esq. Barry, McTiernan & Moore Two Rector Street, 14th Floor New York, NY 10006

Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq. Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP 3 Gateway Center, 12th Floor Newark, NJ 07 102-53 1 1

Christopher Bridge, Esq. Sibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP 300 Chemical Bank Building 59 Delaware Avenue 3uffal0, NY 14202-3866

3cott R. Emery, Esq. ,ynch Daskal Emery, LLP !64 West 40th Street qew York, NY 10018

ohn J. Fanning, Esq. hllen and Dykman, LLP 77 Montague Street hooklyn, NY 11201

!obert R. Rigolosi, Esq. ;egal, McCambridge, Singer & Mahoney, Ltd 30 Third Avenue, Suite 400 Jew York, NY 10022

Page 66: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

Donald R. Pugliese, Esq. McDermott, Will & Emery 340 Madison Avenue 17th Floor New York. NY 10173-1922

Joseph G. Colao, Esq. Leader & Berkon, Esqs. 630 Third Avenue, 17th Floor New York, NY 10017

Lisa M. Pascarella, Esq. Pehlivanian, Braaten & Pascarella LLC Paynter's Ridge Office Park 2430 Route 34 P.O. Box 648 Manasquan, NJ 08736

Mr. Christopher P. Browne McGuire Woods, LLP 1345 Avenue of the Americas, 7th floor New York, NY 10105-0106

Kevin C. Tierney, Esq. Tierney Law Offices 1 125 Land Title Building 100 South Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19 1 10

Richard P. Marin, Esq. Marin Goodman, LLP 40 Wall Street - 57th Floor Yew York, N Y 10005

2hristina Alvarez, Esq. Kosowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP I633 Broadway \Jew York, NY 10019

an R. Grodman, Esq. ,aw Offices of Ian R. Grodman, PC i15 Valley Street - Suite 170 daplewood, NJ 07040

lawn Dezii, Esq.

c

Page 67: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

< L

Margolis Edelstein 100 Century Parkway, Suite 200 Mount Laurel, NJ 08054

Daniel W. Morrison, Esq. Bleakley, Platt & Schmidt, LLP One North Lexington Avenue White Plains, NY 10601

Peter Marlette, Esq. Damon & Morey, LLP Avant Building, Suite 1200 200 Delaware Ave Buffalo, NY 14202-21 50

Paul Scrudato, Esq. Schiff Hardin & Waite LLP 900 Third Avenue, 23rd Floor New York, NY 10022

Samuel Goldblatt, Esq. Nixon Peabody LLP Key Towers at Fountain Plaza 40 Fountain Plaza, Suite 500 Buffalo, NY 14202-2223

James W. Smith, Esq. Smith Abbot, LLP 90 Broad Street Fourth Floor New Y ork, NY 10004

Jeffrey Kluger, Esq. McGivney & Kluger, PC 23 Vreeland Road, Suite 220 Florham Park, NJ 07932

Genevieve MacSteel, Esq. McGuire Woods, LLP - NY 1345 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FI. New York, NY 10105-0106

William F. Mueller, Esq. Clemente, Mueller & Tobia, P.A. 2 1 8 Ridgedale Avenue PO Box 1296 Morristown. NJ 07962-1 296

!

I

I

j

!

I

I

!

i

I

i

I

j

1

I

i i

Page 68: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

William J. Bradley, Esq. Malaby & Bradley, LLC 150 Broadway, Suite 600 New York, NY 10038

Jeffrey S . Berkowitz, Esq. Dreier, LLP 499 Park Ave New York, NY 10022

HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN, DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP Attorneys for Defendant, Frick Company, improperly pled as York International Corporation (Individually and Successor to Frick Company) 7

Sworn to before me rhi&z$ay of April, 2010

n

-- G O T a Y PUBLIC

I I !

I

I

~

!

j

i !

I

j ~

~

I ! I ! I I

i

! i I

!

i

~

i i

Page 69: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBl%TOS r. *. UXGATION

c * ' * ' *

This Document Applies to:

LOUIS G. D'ADDIO,

Plaintif@),

NO OhOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

NYCALi I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)

Index No. 190 125/09

-against-

WHEREFORE, defendant BRADLEY CORPORATION hereby request summary

judgment in the abave-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant BRADLEY CORPORATION with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all codefendants, all claims and cross claims against

without CQS~S.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York April 15,2010

New York, New Yo& 10022 (212) 605-6200

SO ORDERED:

\

Page 70: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

* f"* f ' *

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK $<Ev (' $: *- 1'1

e.;

WILLIAM PIPER, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AS TO

FORD MOTOR COMPANY Plaintiff(s), :

AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., et al.,

Defendant(s). :

WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York April 26,2010

By: Hilary s. Macklin Esq. AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &

Attorneys for Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY 757 Third Avenue New York, New York 100 17

.w - By: Brian Early, Esq. EARLY & STRAUSS, LLC 360 Lexington Ave. DEUTSCH, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff New York, New York 10017

T: 212-593-6700 F: 212-593-6970

SO ORDERED:

{00862146.DOC } t lAY 1 4 2010

Page 71: s), RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X ... Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

WILLIAM KLINE and DOROTHY L. KLINE NO OPPOSITION SUMn R JUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

WHEREFORE defendant Flowserve US, Inc., solely as successor to Edward Valve, Inc.

(L'Flowserve US') hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant

Flowserve US with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto. -. .-

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Flowserve US be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Ne,vTr New York ,2010

ulvaney & Carpenter, LLP Attorneys for Defendant Flowsewe US, Inc., solely as successor to Edward Valve, Inc. 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor New York, New York 10005

- -- -- Early, Ludwick. Sweeney n, Esq. & Strauss

360 Lexington Avenue, 20th Floor New York, NY 10017

-&--" SO ORDERED, F I L E D

1403762-1

...