s), re: new york city : nycal as be s to s litigation x ... canada inc. hereby request summary...
TRANSCRIPT
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK __“_____________1______ll______r________-------”-------------- X IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
AS BE S TO S LITIGATION X
ELLA MAE ROBERTSON7 as Executrix for the Estate : of JIMMY C. ROBERTSON and ELLA MAE
______l__l___l_r-_--________________I___~---------------------
Index Nos. 102345/05
ROBERTSON, Individually, PB”””-’ ---- . \ : NO OPPOSITION
: MOTION AND ORDER
: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,
Plaintiff( s), : SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., : IASPart30
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that -upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross -claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York 9 - 2 s - Ic;l
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.
By:
I L E 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
264 West 40th Street New York, New York 1001 8 MAY 2 4 2010 (212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York i4M 14 2010
SO ORDERED:
' TMc:CCCjpkj 2/81 I 0
SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, d 117398/02 i ASSIGNED TO:
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
EUGENE O'BRIEN
I HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER I 1 NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY 1 JUDGMENT MOTION AND
i ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: NewkYork,jNew York
zzziz; mi, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 5
RICHARD W. BABINECZ, ESQ.
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598
Attorney for \b efendant
SO ORDERED:
Our File No S-4402-07
TMc:CC(jpk)' 3/30/10
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
JOSEPH PALMESE I NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY i JUDGMENT MOTION AND i ORDER I
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Ne York, ew York + .I;. 1
.hlcCann, Esq. W. BABINECZ, ESQ.
BH asq. / r r c & & d ~ M / 1 \ WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035
Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
SO ORDERED:
Our File No S-4130-98
X /cases/FBW30274/legallNOSJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK 1____________~1_1~1~_-------~------111~~~~~~~~~~"~----------1- X IndexNo.: 1052G!-W& - -
THOMAS J. CRUGER, SR., 102783/00 & _- - _r
Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
-against- ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
$32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, .-
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs, " \ \ % a h a
/-'
Esq.
4 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff
180 Maiden Lane Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
+?k New York, New York 1003 8 (212) 558-5500
2 Rector Street, 14" Floor New York, New York 1000&
f7 (212) 313-3600
-.. "5; .,<p SO ORDEMD, Hon. Sherry Kleinxeitler $-
. .. . . . . . .. . - . . . . - . ...
TMcCCipk) '
3/30/10
3
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
NICHOLAS SANTORA
I : NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY / JUDGMENT MOTION AND I ORDER
I
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100
Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598
SO ORDERED:
Our File No
\yA'( 1 4 2010 S-4166-98
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C. & S., NC.
1 1 103 1/98 6 102783/00 & -.. ." ---- 121743/97 'A, -- -I--
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
NYCAL 1.A.S. PSI? 30
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
$32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs. q\>x\\o
4 0, Attorneys for Plaintiff
180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500
Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14" FI New York, New York (212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,
"against-
Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
$32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, -;$
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
.. . , .
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs. 4\SB\\O
I'
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500
Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor . New York, New York 1000
r* + ,? (212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED, --%
Hon. Sherry Klein-%eitler
Plaintiff,
-against- : NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER
A. C. & S., INC.,et&,
Defendants. X ________________-I--___________r________----------"--------------
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and
Goodyear Canada Inc. (together, "Goodyear") hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Goodyear
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Goodyear be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
WEITZ & LUkENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
New York, New York 100 (212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.SlC.
MAY 2 4 2010
MEW YORK WUIVT/ CERK'S OFFICE
Plaintiff( s),
-against-
A.C. & S., INC.
Defendant( s).
Index No.: 10 1 176/99
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
NYCAL I . A S Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
$321 2, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs. L\\ r.a\\o
- Frank Ortiz, Esq. Halbardier, Esq.
& MOORE2 Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500
Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14fh Floor New York, New York 10006
SO ORDERED,
NAY 14
TMc:CCCjpk) 3/24/10
SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION,
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
LESTER KNOPP
INDEX NO. 103373/99 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc,, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York Y/w /w 0
Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035
Consolidated Edison Cor&hy of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003%$8
0 SO ORDERED:
pile No '-99 3'IA'f P 4 2010
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc, hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York q-x5-r. IO
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.
By:
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
264 West 40th Street New York, New York 1001 8
(212) 558-5500 (2 12) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED: V
Hon. Sherry Klein Heijer, J.S.C.
: NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER Plaintiffs,
-against- : Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, : IASPart30 A.C. & S., INC.,gtd.,
Defendants . t f ................................................................
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York &--&-ID
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C, Attorneys for Plaintiffs
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire &
c
0 2aia
New York, New York 1OO#r 2 (2 12) 302-2400
SO ORDERED: * MAY 1 4 2010 Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
-against-
A. C. & S, INC., et al.,
Index NOS.&HV~W+J u2&wQ&
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Sheny Klein Heitler, IAS Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Lnc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
264 West 40' Street
(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
PAY 14 EM@\
Plaintiff( s),
-against-
A.C. & S., INC.
Index No.: 107913199
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
$32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs. c"
- -_
'1 A r, Esq. N & MOORE
Frank C
prejudice and without costs. c
-_ Frank Ortiz, Esq. Halbardier, E<. WEITZ & LUXENBER Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500
BARRY, MCTIERNAN & MOORE Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor New York, New York 10006 (212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED, SO ORDERED,- Hon.
i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
WHEREFOKE, defendant A. Q, Smith Water Products Company hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant A, 0. Smith Water Products Company-
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant A, 0. Smith Water Products Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs,
New YO , New York Y b D ,2009 Dated:
. . . -.----- .
Matthew McIntyre, Esq. / Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003
e He16 Antoniou Mcbo&an, Esq. McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP Attorneys for Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION
CHARLES E. MACK, JR., : Index No. 109747/99
: NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARYJUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
-against- : MOTION AND ORDER
: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, : IASPart30 A.C. & S., INC., gt d.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled caae, pursuaut to
I
I CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and aoodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all ca-defendants, all claims and cross claims against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Lnc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York 5-+ - l O
WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyoar Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.
7 By:
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
264 West 40th Street New York, New York 10018
(212) 558-5500 (2 12) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York I
SO ORDERZD:
I I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
ARNOLD JOHNSON, Personal Representative for the Estate of XAVIER PRANCKEVICUS,
:
Plaintiff,
-against-
A, C. & S., INC., @ &,
: Index No 14-1 0444.8 7 1 10954/99"" --
: NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.
Goodyear Canada Inc. (together, "Goodyear") hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 321 2, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against Goodyear
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against ...
Goodyear be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Yo k New * WEITZ & LUkENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants
Jason Kaufman, Esq.
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
2 6 4 West 40th Street New York, New York 100 18
(212) 302-2400 F I L Dated: New York, New York
MAY 2 4 2010
SO ORDERED: T
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.SlC.
X. :/cases/FBW37X2X/legal/NOSJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW Y O N
DONALD SAWYER, X ................................................................
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C. & S., INC.
Index No,: 1 1 1 152/99
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request
summary judgment in .the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
$32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500
FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14fh Floor New York, New York 10006 (212) 313-3600 _ -
e SO ORDERED,
i i i z o t o 4 I I
\
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION,
ALAN EDWARD PAUZE
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ " _
INDEX NO. 113354199 ASSIGNED TO: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
I \
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
" T i m o g .h/lcCann, Esq. RICH W. BABINECZ, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY
D a x y R. Kraft, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035
SO ORDERED:
Our Pile No S-654 1-99
1 1
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C. & S,, INC.
Index No.: 1 15029/99
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
$32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038
Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor
(212) 558-5500 New York, New York 10006 (212) 313Z36QO
SO ORDERED,
MAY 14 2010
Plaintiff( s),
-against-
A.C. & S., INC.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
532 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500
Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14* Floor New York, New York 10006
TMc:CCGpk) 3/30/10 3
S U P E M E COURT : ALL COUNTIES
IN RE NEW Y O U CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIOI$ "
..._______
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
JOSEPH PALMESE
HON. SHERRY KLElN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 321 2, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant :$2onsolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are: I hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs. '4
/" Timot cCann, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadwav
RICH%.$ BABINECZ, ESQ, Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New . . .
New York, NY 100035 York. Inc. 4 Irving Place New York,eY
.I 2 4 lQIQ SO ORDERED: \
Our File No S-4 130-98
20 10
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Tire &
Inc.
By : Daniel Blouin, Esq.
New York, New York 100 18 264 West 40th Street 700 Broadway
New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
c?AY 14 2010
. ..
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C, & S., INC.
Index No.: 100592/00
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
$32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14'h Floor
1 SO Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038
P 4 %QlQ
(212) 558-5500 New York, New York 10006 (212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED, f ' *b-- 'k
MAY I 4 2UlU
4.C and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG ZONTRACTING AND SUPPLY), et al.,
WHEREFORIE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
OWERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be arid the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice mnd without costs.
Dated: New York, New York Atxi1 19.2010
,4AR ON SON FEINSTEIN & DEUTSC'H, LLP Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Compan 757 Third Avenue dp ~ e w York, N ~ W York 100% 201B
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 Counsel for: WILLIAM 'I. FRANKLIN and ANNE I,. FRANKLIN
. .. .. . . _
TMc:CCCjpk) 3/30/10
SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, .. "-"_--.--____"____---------"------.--.....-.-------~-----------.......-.
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
NICHOLAS SANTORA
Our File No $4166-98
AS SIGNED-TG: HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there .being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby .-
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New Yor New York r l , Q ~ W O
Danny R. Kraft, Esq. WEITZ & LUXEN Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100
Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New
4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598
SO OFXIERED:
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C. & S., INC.
Index No.: 10
121743/97
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
NYCAL I._k,.s. ?El? 30
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
532 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
+\st? \ \o /-
Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500
Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor New York, New York 1000
I 4
1' *I ^ "
(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,
MAY 1 4 2010
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 103534/00
VINCENT S. PATTNOSH and ANNA PATTNOSH, his wife
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER ____________.___...-
WHEREFOm, defendant Flowserve US, Inc., solely as successor to Edward Valves,
Tnc., (improperly sued as Edward Vogt Valve Company, Individually and as successor to
Edwards Valves, Inc.), ((LFlowserve US") hereby requests summary judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant Flowserve US with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Flowserve US be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York +./ (97 ,2010
Pamela R. Gold-Zafra, Esq.- Attorneys for Plaintiffs Wilentz, Goldrnan & Spitzer 1 10 William Street, 26th Floor New York. NY 10038
McElroy, Dhtsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP Attorneys for Defendant Flowserve US, Inc., solely as successor to Edward Valves, Inc. 88 Pine Street, 241h Floor New York, New York 10005
FILED SO ORDERED,
I42 1472-1
x : / x ~ - 3 9 4 3 a n ~ ~ o s Jn;l
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFX COUNTY OF NEW YORK
Plaintiff( s),
- against -
ABB LUMMUS CREST, INC., et al.;
NO OPPOSITION SUMMUY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 103784/00
NYCAL I ! I.A.S. Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL fMa UTICA BOILER hereby
request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL fMa
UTICA BOILER with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL W a UTICA BOILER, be and the same are hereby
dismissed ith prejudice and without costs.
5h/b
Pamela R, Gold-Zafra,Esy LJ Attorney for Plaintiffs Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer 11 0 William Street New York, New York 10038
SO ORDERED,
. .
Nicole Pitti,Esq. Attorneys for ECR INTERNATIONAL fMa UTICA BOILER Barry McTiernan & Moore 2 Rector Street, 14* Floor New York, New York 10006 (212) 313-3600
EiAY 2 4 2010
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York /o
XENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff
By: aniel Blouin, Esq.
F"Ce, 700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
264 West 40th Street New York, New York 1001 8
(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400
4 2018 M Y
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED: Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, J.S.C.
. . . -
TMc:CCCjpk) 3/30/10
SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW Y O N
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONj 0 ___I_....._......... ____________________--"-..............~.~~-----"------
'ANDEX No.
i HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
1 121 27'0O-and 08387/00 i il AqSIGNED TO: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ................................................................
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: i
JOHN MICHAEL MALLON ' NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
j ORDER I
1 i JUDGMENT MOTION AND
3
I
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York,]pc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs. !
Dated: New york, Vew York
Msrtthew MacIntyre, E$. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035
R I C H A ~ D w. BABINECZ, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598
G W
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
$321 2, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, " A >
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
d without costs. "
---I--
%5( M. Halbardier, Esq. BARRY, MCTIERNAN & MOORE Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14fh Floor New York, New York 10006
Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 (212) 558-5500
.- 7 TMc:CCGpk)
3/30/10
SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION/I 112127JNKand 108387/00
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
JOHN MICHAEL MALLON i NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY I JUDGMENT MOTION AND
! ORDER
3
i
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs,
Dated: New ork, ew York
~~~~
/
Matthew MacIntyre, E&. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 5
RICHA~D w. BABINECZ, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. 4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598
S-8040-00
Plaintiff(s)
-against-
A.C & S. INC. et al.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS, hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS , with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
. Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Attorney for the Attorneys for Defendant
WEXTZ & LUXENB
700 Broadway New York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,
FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14th floor New York. NY 10006 (212) 313-3600
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
Plaintiff( s), lndex N H 0-00; 1 10269?-eL>- I
---€WO?%-03
(Deceased)
vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et a]., : NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
I : JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. I
X ______________-_-I______________________-----------------
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing I
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no I
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
a T & * / L Matthew T. MacIntyre, I&. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500
CI
Nid1b-M. Kozin, Esq. K&L GATES LLP Attorneys for Defendant CRANE CO.
Newark, NJ 071 02-5252 One Newark Center,
2 4 2010 (973) 848-4000
SO ORDERED, E- Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
NW-332420 V I NAY 1 4 2010
DANIEL KELLY and MARGARET KELLY,
Plaintiffs, -against-
A. C. &S., INC., gal.,
Defendants.
119400/00 _I 7 Index L /"--- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler IAS Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to CPLR
32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is
hereby: ~
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims asserted
against defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same hereby are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York APRIL zq ,2010
WEITZ & LUXENE$F>RG, P p , LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP 7 1 2
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
700 Broadway New York, New York 10038
Dated: New York, New York
(212) 558-5500
and Goodyear Canada Inc.
264 West 40th Street New York, New York 1001 8 (212) 302-2400 '4' 2 4 2010
SO ORDERED: m Hon. Sherry Klein Heitier, J.S.C. MAY 1 4 2010
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOFX COUNTY OF NEW YORK
Matthew McIntyre, Esq. / Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003
WHEREFORE, defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company hereby requests
McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP Attorneys for Defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross cIaims against
defendant A. 0. Smith Water Products Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
SO ORDERED,
1344397-1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK _""r_____________"_______l_____r_____l____------__-------_---- X rN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
_____I______________r________l_______r_l---"___~----r_-~------ X STELLA O'KREPA, Individually and as Executrix : for the Estate of MICHAEL O'KREPA, SR.,
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
Index No. 123075/00
: NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER
Plaintiff( s),
-against- : Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,
A. C. & S . INC., gt d. IASPart30
3 I
!
!
i WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York MrS
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.
By:
264 West 40fh Street New York, New York 1001 8
Scott A. Harford, Esq.
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500 (2 12) 302-2400 F I L E D Dated: New York, New York NAY z 4 zaio,
NEW YO SO ORDERED:
MAY k 4 2010
vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., : NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY : JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. X _____II_________________________111_____"----------------
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing , _ ,
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
WEIT2 & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, I
K&L GATES LLP Attorneys for Defendant CRANE CO. One Newark Center, Newark. NJ 07 102-5252 (973) 848-4000
- 1 A A (973) 848-4000
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
NW-332420 V I
< SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK w 2OUNTY OF NEW YORK
[N RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL .___II_______________rr______lll________--------------------"------ X
ASBESTOS LITIGATION _________I___________I__________________-------------"~------"-"--- X
This Document Relates To:
EUGENE DEGANNES and JACQUELINE DEGANNES
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION ON
BEHALF OF FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Index No.: 103007/01 Plaintiff(s), :
I against - L
A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTTNG AND SUPPLY), et al.,
WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
a ainst &ice
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims defendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismi and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York April 19, 20 10
By: ~ Frank Ortiz, Esq.
my 2 Q 2014
Justin M. Kasrnir, Esq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.w 700 Broadway & DEUTSCH, LLP New York, New York 10003 ' Attorneys for Defendant Counsel for: EUGENE DEGANNES and Ford Motor Company JACQUELINE DEGANNES 757 Third Avenue
New York, New York 100 17
P AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN
T: 2 12-593 1822 F: 212-593-6970
SO ORDERED:
{ 008H469.DOC }
X:cases\FHW422 I6\legal\NOSJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
1-
FRANK SCHULTE,
Plaintiff(s)
/-"-> Index {lo69770 /*' 1, J1937WOO &
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
100779,03 "4 **.. --__+-J
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS, hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS , with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
4 \ M3\\Q
ia Malikzay, Esq. arry, McTiernan & Moore
FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14th floor New York, NY 10006
WEITZ & LUXENB Attorney for the plai 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant New York, NY 10003
F I L E D (212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED, MAY 2 4 20@
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
CHARLES BERENGER and MARGARET BERENGER, : I.A.S. Part 30
: NYCAL
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
: Index No(s).: 107025-01 Plaintiff(s),
-against- : NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
A.C. & S., INC., et al., : JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated:
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500
599 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212) 536-3900
SO ORDERED, Hon. Sherry €&in Heitler
A.C. & S., INC., et al.,
NYCAL
Index No. 108564/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, IAS Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York .1\ &\\\e
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. n
Scott A. Harford, Esq. By: v-%oa By:
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq.
264 West 40* Street New York, New York 10018
(212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400 MAY 2 4 2014
Dated: New York, New York
i l i \ r A4 2010 SO ORDERED:
.. . - . . . ... .- . . . .. - .. . -
JYCAL
ANNIE WARD, as Executrix for the Estate of J.D. WARD,
: Index No. 109480/03
-against-
Plaintiff( s), : NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT : MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goohjear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York L - i \ %\ \ lo
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.
By: By:
F I L E D Scott A. Harford, Esq.
264 West 40th Street
Frank M. Ortiz, Es
700 Broadway
MAY 2 4 2010 New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 1001 8 (212) 558-5500 (2 1 2) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL X ________r_r_r___________________________------________________
ASBESTOS LITIGATION X
DIANA Y. WRIGHT, Individually and as Executrix for : the Estate of PHILLIP L. WRIGHT,
.............................................................. Index No. 109598/01
Plaintiff(s), : NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- : MOTION AND ORDER
A.C. & $. INC., et al., : Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler,
X Defendants. : IASPart30
______________"__I__I_______________________-____-----------"
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York v -zy - I \s
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.
By:
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003
264 West 40* Street New York, New York 100 18
MAY 2 4 2010 (212) 558-5500 (2 12) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED: Hon. Sherry Kleh Heitler, J.S.C.
-against-
A.C. & S . INC., et al.,
Defendants.
iY CA
Index No. 109770/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, IAS Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire L Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York 4\ h \ \ O
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff - By: % Frank M. Ortiz,
700 Broadway New York, New York 10003 (212) 558-5500
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.
By: - g
264 West 40"' Street New York, New York 10018
Scott A. Harford, Esq.
FILED (212) 302-2400
MAY 2 4 2010 Dated: New York, New York
NEW YORK WUMy GLERK'S OFFICF
SO ORDERED:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Plaintiff( s),
-against-
A.C. & S . INC., et al.,
NYCAL
Index No. 110164/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, IAS Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York 4-1.5- 1 0
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.
By: : Scott A. Harford, Esq,
4.p 700 Broadway 264 West 40* Street I L q ) New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10018 (212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400 20744
Dated: New York, New York *Q$Q&
9p31=F SO ORDERED:
ViAY 14 201Q
I 1
Plaintiff(s), NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND
-against- ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
$321 2, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, I 4
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims agaiht
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs. 4 \ 2-8 h
~
Frank Ortiz, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant 180 Maiden Lane I FULTON BOILER WORKS New York, New York 10038 2 Rector Street, 14fh Floor (212) 558-5500 New York, New York 10006
(212) 313-3600 --
SO ORDERED,- H
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C. & S., INC.
&-ITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
$32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs. v\\ a- b.\ L o
albardier, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14fh Floor
180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038
(212) 558-5500 New York, New York 10006 !LED 8 y 2 4 2010
12) 313-3600
bb. SO ORDERED,
4..
TMc:CC(jpk) 12/3/09
IN RE NEW YOFX CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, 11 1867/01 I ASSIGNED TO: i HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER
1 NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY i JUDGMENT MOTION AND ! ORDER
__.._...__..___ " _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - " - - - - " - - - - . . ~ ~ . - - . - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ! NICHOLAS DELFINO
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and the same are hereby
!
I
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Attorneys for Plaintiff 700 Broadway New York, NY 100035
4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598
SO ORDERED:
Our File No S-6 149-0 1
Plaintiff( s), : NO OPPOSITION : SUMMARY JUDGMENT
-against- : MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York . Z \ L \ \ \ O
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. A
Frank M. Ortiz, Esq
700 Broadway 264 West 40th Street New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 1001 8 (212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400 my 2 4 2010
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED: AUY 14 2010
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.C. & S., INC.
& 111231/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
$321 2, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs. 4\33 \ \p
Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 1003 8 (212) 558-5500
Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor New York, New York 10006 (212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,
X. :/cases/FBW443549/legal/NOSJM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
-----___---_r_"_------------------------------------------------ X I n d ~ ~ 4 / 0 1 JOHN EPP,
cowry OF NEW YORK
,J /& 12 1854/0 1
Plaintiff(s), - .- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY ,/' >//'
JUDGMENT MOTION AND -against- ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
$32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS
with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, '* ' Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs. 4 b $/ LG
Attorneys for Plaintiff 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 1003 8
Attorneys for Defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14'h Floor New York, New York 1 0 0 0 6 ~
> ! D $&**~ (212) 558-5500
12) 313-3600
, t 4.j 2 4 mQ I T
SO ORDERED,
TMc:CCCjpk) 21811 0
SUPREME COURT : ALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK .__ " _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ " _ " --......~.....- " " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . - . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
lN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION, I _____...........~-_- ~ " - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - ........-...-.~-- "-~"----------------..
HON. SHERRY KLEIN HEITLER THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
EUGENE O'BRIEN JUDGMENT MOTION AND I NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
ORJIER
WHEREFORE, defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Consolidated Edison
Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims
against defendant Consolidated Edidon Company of New York? Inc., be and the same are .hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
-9 I
Dated: New/York,flew York
700 Broadway New York, NY 100035 York, Inc.
4 Irving Place New York, NY 10003-3598
SO ORDERED:
Our File No I S-4402-07
'! 2010
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
JN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
JAMES MCKENNA : I.A.S. Part 30 (Deceased)
X - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - - - - - -
: NYCAL
: (Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler)
Plaintiff(s), Index Nn *,+l-lX&~-flO:
vs . i C 4 E e - J A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., : NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY
: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER Defendants.
X ----"_11_1"11________--1--1--~---1------------------
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant * to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CRANE CO, with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Matthew T. MacIntyre, gsq. WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 700 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (212) 558-5500
%& k+b+ Ni 1 , Kozin, Esq. K&L GATES LLP Attorneys for Defendant CRANE CO. One Newark Center, Tent Newark, NJ 07102-5252 (973) 848-4000
SO ORDERED, * Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler
I
6.: 106977/01, lp*19379/O0 & * Plaintiff( s)
-against-
- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS, hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS , with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to d l co-defendants, all. claims and cross claims against
defendant, FULTON BOILER WORKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
md without costs.
q \ &8\\0
WEITZ & LUXENB Attorney for the plai 700 Broadway Attorneys for Defendant Yew York, NY 10003
ia Malikzay, Esq.
FULTON BOILER WORKS 2 Rector Street, 14" floor New York, NY 10006
I D (212) 313-3600
30 ORDERED, MAY 2 4 2010
-against- .Index No.: 11 1930/03
A. W. CHESTERTON CO., et al.,
Defendant(s). :
WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York April 28,2010
--b By: Brian Early, Esq. EARLY & STRAUSS LLC 360 Lexington Ave. New York, New York 10017 Attorneys for Louis Desisto
FEINSTEIN &
Attorneys for Defendant Ford Motor Company 757 Third Avenue New York, New York 10017 T: 212-593-6700 F: 212-593-6970
SO ORDERED:
{ 00863032.
e SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,,
NYCAL
NO OPPOSITIO3 SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Sherry Klein Heitler, IAS Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear
Canada Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the
same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York 4-29- w
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP Attorneys for Defendants The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada Inc.
B By:
700 Broadway 264 West 40* Street New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10018 MAY 2 4 2010 (212) 558-5500 (212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:
Plaintif&),
- against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.;
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 190023/08
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL E/k/a UTICA BOILERS, INC.
hereby request summary judgment in the abovsentitled case, pwsuant to Civil Practice Law and
Rules Section 321 2, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL
W a UTICA BOILER, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL U'Wa UTICA BOILERS, INC., be and the same are: hereby
dismissed w'tli prejudice and without costs.
5/$0 /-2pJ
Patti Burshtyn,Esq. Attorney for Plaintiffs TIONAL EIWa Weitz & Luxenberg 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038
UTICA BOILERS, INC. Barry McTieman & Moore 2 Rector Street, 14'h Floor New York, New York 10006
- F ' L E ~ (212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED, h,4y 4 2070
Plaintiff@),
- against - AD, SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et ale;
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 190023/08
NYCAL I.A.S. Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request summary
judgment iii the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims agaitlst
defendants FULTON BOILER WOKS, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and wit o costs. 5$flO
Attorney for Plaintiffs Weitz & Luxenberg 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038
Attorneys for FULTON BOILER WORKS Barry McTiernan & Moore 2 Rector Street, 14" Floor New York, New York 10006 (212) 313-3600
so QICDEWD,
' ,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
- against - Index No.: 190092/09
A.W. C'HESTERTON COMPANY, et al.,
Defendant(s). :
WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and thcre being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York April 26, 2010
~.
By: Frank Ortiz, Esq.
700 Broadway DEUTSCH, LLP New York, New York 10003 Attorneys for JAMES V. LYNCH and MARY LYNCl1 757 Third Avenue
Attorneys for Defendant FORD MOTOR C O M m
New York, New York 10017 T: 2 12-593-6700
SO OIUIERED:
MAY 14 2010 {oos62151 rloc j *
I
Y
I
04/15120fb 13-:34 FAX 2 1 2 986 2255 E A R L Y S T R A U S S
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YBRK COUNTY OF NEW VQRK
MFEIIEREFORE, defondant, Frick Company! lrnpropsrly pied as York International
hrparation (Individually and as $uccessor to Wick Company). licrobv ~ E ~ L J E S ~ S stimma:'y
.idgment j i '~ The ahoveaititlecl case, pursuant tc;~ Civil Practice Law ;:tnd Rules Secticm 321 2
nternertiona! Cnrpwstion (Individually and as SCLEC~SSDT to Frick Company). with
3 ORDERED: ................................ ~ ................. Horiota ble
MAY 14 2818
i
I
I
I ~
!
!
~
I
!
i
< L
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
HELENA CAMPBELL, being duly sworn deposes and says I am an employee of Hoagland, Longo
\/loran, Dunst & Doukas, LLP, the attorneys for Defendants, Frick Company, improperly pled as Yor€
nternational Corporation (Individually and as Successor to Frick Company).
That on the &%ay of April, 2010 a copy of the within No Opposition Motions for Summar)
Judgment were mailed, via first class to: Derell Wilson, Esq., Early, Ludwick, Sweeney & Straws, 36C
Lexington Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10017 and one copy to the following attorneys on the
attached service list by first-class mail, postage prepaid.
I hereby certify that the foregoing statements made by me are true. I am aware that if any of the
foregoing statements made by me are willfully false, I am subject to punishment.
SERVICE RIDER
Robert C. Malaby, Esq. Malaby & Bradley, LLC 150 Broadway, Suite 600 Vew York, NY 10038
tulie Evans, Esq. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker 150 East 42nd Street \Jew York, NY 10017-5639
.ohn J. Kot, Esq. Naters, McPherson & McNeill 100 Lighting Way - 7th Floor '0 Box 1560 kcaucus, NJ 07096
oseph 1. Ortego, Esq. Jixon Peabody, LLP 0 Jericho Quadrangle - Suite 300 ericho, NY 1 1753-2728
Thomas M. Beneventano, Esq. LaSorsa & Beneventano 3 Barker Avenue, #70 White Plains, NY 10601
Judith Yavitz, Esq. Reed Smith, LLP 599 Lexington Avenue, 26th Floor New York, NY 10022
Charles M. McGivney, Esq. McGivney & Kluger, PC 80 Broad Street, 23rd Floor New York, NY I0004
Frank A. Cecere, Jr., Esq. Ahmuty, Demers & McManus 200 I.U. Willets Road Albertson, NY 11507
Yvette Harmon, Esq. McGuire Woods, LLP - NY 1345 Avenue of the Americas, 7th F1. New York, NY 10105-0106
Arthur D. Bromberg, Esq. Weiner Lesniak LLP 629 Parsippany Road PO Box 438 Parsippany, NJ 07054-0438
Steven A. Weiner, Esq. 3'Toole Fernandez Weiner Van Lieu, LLC 50 Pompton Avenue Verona, NJ 07044
Vlonakee Griffin, Esq. llcGivney & Kluger, PC 30 Broad Street, 23rd Floor Vew York. NY 10004
]avid H. Arnsten, Esq. Magher , Gosseen, Faller & Crowley 1010 Franklin Ave, Suite 400 2arden City, NY 11530
l
I
!
! i
I
! 1
! I I
!
1
I
i
I I j
i
i
~
!
I
~
j
i ! ~
i
< L
Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP One Newark Center, 10th Floor Newark, NJ 07 102
James R. Lynch, Esq. Lynch Daskal Emery, LLP 264 West 40th Street New York, NY 10018
Joan Gaisor, Esq. McGivney & Kluger, PC 80 Broad Street, 23rd Floor New York, NY 10004
Suzanne Halbardier, Esq. Barry, McTiernan & Moore Two Rector Street, 14th Floor New York, NY 10006
Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq. Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, LLP 3 Gateway Center, 12th Floor Newark, NJ 07 102-53 1 1
Christopher Bridge, Esq. Sibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP 300 Chemical Bank Building 59 Delaware Avenue 3uffal0, NY 14202-3866
3cott R. Emery, Esq. ,ynch Daskal Emery, LLP !64 West 40th Street qew York, NY 10018
ohn J. Fanning, Esq. hllen and Dykman, LLP 77 Montague Street hooklyn, NY 11201
!obert R. Rigolosi, Esq. ;egal, McCambridge, Singer & Mahoney, Ltd 30 Third Avenue, Suite 400 Jew York, NY 10022
Donald R. Pugliese, Esq. McDermott, Will & Emery 340 Madison Avenue 17th Floor New York. NY 10173-1922
Joseph G. Colao, Esq. Leader & Berkon, Esqs. 630 Third Avenue, 17th Floor New York, NY 10017
Lisa M. Pascarella, Esq. Pehlivanian, Braaten & Pascarella LLC Paynter's Ridge Office Park 2430 Route 34 P.O. Box 648 Manasquan, NJ 08736
Mr. Christopher P. Browne McGuire Woods, LLP 1345 Avenue of the Americas, 7th floor New York, NY 10105-0106
Kevin C. Tierney, Esq. Tierney Law Offices 1 125 Land Title Building 100 South Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19 1 10
Richard P. Marin, Esq. Marin Goodman, LLP 40 Wall Street - 57th Floor Yew York, N Y 10005
2hristina Alvarez, Esq. Kosowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP I633 Broadway \Jew York, NY 10019
an R. Grodman, Esq. ,aw Offices of Ian R. Grodman, PC i15 Valley Street - Suite 170 daplewood, NJ 07040
lawn Dezii, Esq.
c
< L
Margolis Edelstein 100 Century Parkway, Suite 200 Mount Laurel, NJ 08054
Daniel W. Morrison, Esq. Bleakley, Platt & Schmidt, LLP One North Lexington Avenue White Plains, NY 10601
Peter Marlette, Esq. Damon & Morey, LLP Avant Building, Suite 1200 200 Delaware Ave Buffalo, NY 14202-21 50
Paul Scrudato, Esq. Schiff Hardin & Waite LLP 900 Third Avenue, 23rd Floor New York, NY 10022
Samuel Goldblatt, Esq. Nixon Peabody LLP Key Towers at Fountain Plaza 40 Fountain Plaza, Suite 500 Buffalo, NY 14202-2223
James W. Smith, Esq. Smith Abbot, LLP 90 Broad Street Fourth Floor New Y ork, NY 10004
Jeffrey Kluger, Esq. McGivney & Kluger, PC 23 Vreeland Road, Suite 220 Florham Park, NJ 07932
Genevieve MacSteel, Esq. McGuire Woods, LLP - NY 1345 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FI. New York, NY 10105-0106
William F. Mueller, Esq. Clemente, Mueller & Tobia, P.A. 2 1 8 Ridgedale Avenue PO Box 1296 Morristown. NJ 07962-1 296
!
I
I
j
!
I
I
!
i
I
i
I
j
1
I
i i
William J. Bradley, Esq. Malaby & Bradley, LLC 150 Broadway, Suite 600 New York, NY 10038
Jeffrey S . Berkowitz, Esq. Dreier, LLP 499 Park Ave New York, NY 10022
HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORAN, DUNST & DOUKAS, LLP Attorneys for Defendant, Frick Company, improperly pled as York International Corporation (Individually and Successor to Frick Company) 7
Sworn to before me rhi&z$ay of April, 2010
n
-- G O T a Y PUBLIC
I I !
I
I
~
!
j
i !
I
j ~
~
I ! I ! I I
i
! i I
!
i
~
i i
In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBl%TOS r. *. UXGATION
c * ' * ' *
This Document Applies to:
LOUIS G. D'ADDIO,
Plaintif@),
NO OhOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
NYCALi I.A.S. Part 30 (Heitler, J.)
Index No. 190 125/09
-against-
WHEREFORE, defendant BRADLEY CORPORATION hereby request summary
judgment in the abave-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant BRADLEY CORPORATION with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all codefendants, all claims and cross claims against
without CQS~S.
Dated: Brooklyn, New York April 15,2010
New York, New Yo& 10022 (212) 605-6200
SO ORDERED:
\
* f"* f ' *
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK $<Ev (' $: *- 1'1
e.;
WILLIAM PIPER, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AS TO
FORD MOTOR COMPANY Plaintiff(s), :
AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC., et al.,
Defendant(s). :
WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York April 26,2010
By: Hilary s. Macklin Esq. AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &
Attorneys for Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY 757 Third Avenue New York, New York 100 17
.w - By: Brian Early, Esq. EARLY & STRAUSS, LLC 360 Lexington Ave. DEUTSCH, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff New York, New York 10017
T: 212-593-6700 F: 212-593-6970
SO ORDERED:
{00862146.DOC } t lAY 1 4 2010
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
WILLIAM KLINE and DOROTHY L. KLINE NO OPPOSITION SUMn R JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE defendant Flowserve US, Inc., solely as successor to Edward Valve, Inc.
(L'Flowserve US') hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 32 12, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant
Flowserve US with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto. -. .-
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Flowserve US be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: Ne,vTr New York ,2010
ulvaney & Carpenter, LLP Attorneys for Defendant Flowsewe US, Inc., solely as successor to Edward Valve, Inc. 88 Pine Street, 24th Floor New York, New York 10005
- -- -- Early, Ludwick. Sweeney n, Esq. & Strauss
360 Lexington Avenue, 20th Floor New York, NY 10017
-&--" SO ORDERED, F I L E D
1403762-1
...