following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i...

29
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers.

Upload: others

Post on 25-Aug-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

Page 2: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK — xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

— xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)TODD VICTOR,

Plaintiff, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,Index No. 109984/2008Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendantCURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there isno opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOWCONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

F I L E DDated: New York, New York, 2017

OCT 0 9 2018BELLUCK &TFQX , LLP CLYDE & CO US LLP

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

546 5th Avenue, 4thNew York, New YoiTel: (212X681-1^75

>r0036

Attorney for Plaintiffs

SO ORDERED: F I L E DLUCY BILLfNGfc

BARBAR^ J.S.C.JUL\n 2018

rjUL fi 2 2018 COUNT/CLERK'S OFFICE/NEW YORK

Page 3: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

i

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xNYCALI.A.S.Part 46 (Billings, J.)LLOYD J. STOIK, Individually and as Executor of the

Estate of LLOYD P. STOIK, and MARY STOIK,Individually, UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERPlaintiff,

-against-IndexNo. 106559/2007A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,

Defendants.

-x

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

F I L E DCONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

, 2017 OCT 0 9 2018BELLUCK &/FOX, LLP CLYDE & CO US LLP COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel:(212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

Esq.546 5th AvenuiNew Yotk, Ne'Tel: (21^ 68/1575

jFloorirk 10036

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED:-LUCYBlCLfNl&S^J.S.C.

BARBARAJUL 1 2 2018

JUL 2 0 2018

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK

Page 4: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-xIN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings,J.)ORVAL G. SNODGRASS and CHARLENE K.

SNODGRASS,UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Plaintiffs,

-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al„ Index No. 114402/2007

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendantCURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there isno opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOWCONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

, 2017

BELLUCK & FOX, LLP CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Cnrtiss-Wright FlowControl

546 5th Avenue, 4tn FloorNew York, New YoHf10036Tel:(212X681-1575

F I L E DAttorney for Plaintiffs

SO ORDERED: / OCT 0 9 2018-.s.c.B

BARBARAPJULT2 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 5: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)JOSEPH SAEVA and NORMA SAEVA,

Plaintiffs, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.Index No. 109983/2008

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

, 2017

BELLUCK & FOX, LL CLYDE & CO US LLP/

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel:(212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

Es.546 5th / venue,«h 'loarlNew Yor c, Newroi c 10036Tel:(212)681M 5J75

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED: /

US J.S.C.BARBARAXJAFFE OCT 0 9 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

113JUL'l 2 2018

Page 6: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK — xIN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

— xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)AUDREY RUDA, Individually and as Executrix of the

Estate of JACK RUDA,UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Plaintiff,

-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al Index No. 103903/2008

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York,New York

, 201

BELLUCK & FOX, LLP CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

f. Esc.!546 5th Avenue/ 401New York!Ne|moiTel: (212)681/1575

FI10036

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED: LLUGYmjJNG&J.S.C.

BARBARA FFEJ .S .C .

OCT 0 9 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKJUL 1 2 2018

Page 7: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)JOHN EDWARD NEDDERBERGER,

Plaintiff, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,Index No. 190285/2010

Defendants.

-xWHEREFORE defendant,CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

, 2017

BELLUCK &FOX, LLP CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

546 5th/Avenue,New York, New/orK 10036Tel:(212) 681-1575

'oor

Attorney fo/Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED:EUCTBfefcfNOSW.S.C.

BARBARAOCT 0 9 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OmCENEW YORKJ U L 1 2

Page 8: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION— xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)PENRYN A. NAUMOFF, Individually and as

Executrix of the Estate of HAROLD NAUMOFF,UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Plaintiff,

-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al„ Index No. 190204/2009

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

, 2017

BELLUCK & FOXALLP CLYDE & CO US LLP

S'-By:By:

<5rkIfWlPeter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

546 5th Avenue, 4tNew York,New YTel:(212) 6811-1575

036

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED:

OCT 0 9 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 9: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-xIN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)PHYLLIS SUE MELANCON, Individually and as

Executrix of the Estate of NEAL LOUISMELANCON, UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERPlaintiff,

-against-IndexNo. 190212/2009A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,

Defendants.

— xWHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendantCURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

, 2017

BELLUCf t FOXJLLP CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

, fcsq-546 5th Av( nia4th FloorNew "York, , Jdw York 10036Tel: (212)i581-ll575

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED:, J.S.C.FEBARBARA J OCT 0 9 2018.s.c.

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 10: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xNYCALI.A.S.Part 46 (Billings, J.)ANASTASIA MAZUR, Individually and as Executrix

of the Estate of JOSEPH F. MAZUR,UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Plaintiff,

-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., Index No. 105403/2008

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

, 2017

BELLUCK & FOX, LLP CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York,New York 10174Tel:(212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

vffq-546 5th Avenue,New York, New frbrk 10036Tel: (212b 681-F57S

oor

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED:-LUeY-BIttT

BARBARAJA.s.c.

OCT 0 9 2018j.s.cCOUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORKrJUL 1 2 2010

Page 11: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

--xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)GEORGE MASTROIANNI, as Executor of the Estate

of FRANK CHARLES MASTROIANNI,UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Plaintiff,

-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., Index No. 100405/2008

Defendants.

“ X

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York. 2017

BELLUCK & PQX, LLP, CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

546 5th/Avenu/ /uiFloorNew Yhrk, Ntff \t>rk 10036Tel:(212) 6*1-1575

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED:LJ.S.C.

BARBARA JAFFEj.s.c.

OCT 0 9 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKr

Page 12: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-— xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)THOMAS J. MARANO,

Plaintiff, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,Index No. 106561/2007

Defendants.

— x

WHEREFORE defendant,CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2017

BELLUCK & FOX,L CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel:(212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

tsq.kth FloorYork 10036

546 6th Avehu'New York,Tel (212) 681-1575

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED:LUCTBlLLINOSH).S.C.

BARBARA JAFFIE OCT 0 9 ? 018J.s.c

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 13: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

limit

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK — xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)THEODORE MAJKA,

Plaintiff, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,Index No. 190054/2009

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2017

BELLUCK & FOX, CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel:(212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

/ , Esq.i, 4th Floor546 5th A

New YorkfNew York 10036Tet (2125 681-1575

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED:tts.c.

OCT 0 9 2018BARBARA J

COUNTY CLERK’S Of MCENEW YORKi

Page 14: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)DONALD R.LANGSTON,

Plaintiff, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-against-

A.O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al„Index No. 106593/2008

Defendants.

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2017

BELLUCK & EOX, LLP. CLYDE & CO US LLP

3̂̂By:By:

Peter Dinunzio, Esq.The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

546 5th Avenu|y4th TjioprNew York, N{J/N Yorkl0036Tel: (2/2) 681-1575

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED:iLUGY-ftiLt r, J.S.C.

OCT 0 9 2018BARBARA JAFFE:s.c. COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

Page 15: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

•xIN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)CARLO KRIVICI and MARICA KRIVICIC,

Plaintiffs, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-against-

A.O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,Index No. 190095/2008

Defendants.

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’ Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2017

BELLUCK4 FOX, L CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorneyfor Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

/ \ Ml , Esq.546 5th AsUM 4th FloorNew York/New York 10036Tel: (^681-1575

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED:EUeYHirXTN«SHJ.S.C.

OCT 0 9 2018BARBARA JAFJ.S.C.

COUNTY CLERK'S Of f ICENEW YORK

JUL 1 2 2011

Page 16: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)BARRY KASVEN, as Administrator of the Estate of

IRENE KASVEN and NATHAN KASVEN,UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Plaintiff,

-against-A.O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., Index No.110879/2008

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2017

BELLUCK & FOX, L CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel:(212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wrighl FlowControl

546 ffth AveiNewfYork,1Tel:(212) J&81-1575

fe, ©th Floorw York 10036

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED:'LUCTBILL

BARBARA JAFFEJ.S.C

s.c.OCT 0 9 ? 018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK1 JUL 1 2 2018

Page 17: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)PHILOMAE S. DONOVAN, Individually and as

Executrix of the Estate of JOHN J. DONOVAN,UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Plaintiff,

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et aL, Index No. 109913/2007

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 201

BELLUCK A F( IX, LLP CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

<q-546 5th Avenue# 4th 7loorNew Y<irk, Ne# York 10036Tel: (212)j68 i-1575

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED:fcUCY-BILLTlIGS/J.S^

BARBARA JAFJ|/

Ml \ 2 2011

OCT 0 9 ?018

COUNTY CLENK'S Ql- HCENEW YORK

Page 18: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

•xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)RICHARD HENN and VIRGINIA HENN,

Plaintiffs, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,Index No. 104802/2008

Defendants.

-xWHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkXt . 2017

BELLUCK <fit FOK, L CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

Esq:546 5th/AviNew York, NeW York 10036Tel:(212) 681-1575

Floor

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED:LrUeirSILLINqS, J.S.C.

OCT 0 9 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S 01HCENEW YORK

BARBARA JAFF ._J U L 1 2 2018

Page 19: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-xIN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)VIRGINIA S. FLOOD, Individually and as Executrix

of the Estate of RICHARD C. FLOOD,UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Plaintiff,

-against-A.O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., Index No. 106562/2007

Defendants.

-X

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

. 2017

BELLUCK &fOX, I/LP CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

L I jj / [ »

546 SthlAwtijm, 4th FloorNew YprkjJflew York 10036Tel: (2 1-1575

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED: /LUCY femes, J.S.C.

/JAFFEJ .s.c.

JUL 1 2 2018OCT 0 9 2018BARBA!

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 20: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK --xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

-xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)DIANA DURAN, as Executrix of the Estate of

Carmelo Duran, deceased, and SEBESBRINDAMALDONADO DURAN, UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERPlaintiffs,

-against-IndexNo. 190019/2008

A.O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York,2'BELLUCK*FDX, LLP CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel:(212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

I I // I ,Escr546 5th Avenup/4tfc FloorNew Yor!Tel:(212) 681-1575

York 10036

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED:$S, J.S.C.WFFEJ .s .c .

OCT 0 9 2018BARBARACOUNTY CLERK'S OPHCE

NEW YORKJUL 1 2 2018

Page 21: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)PAUL M. KERRISSEY, as Executor of the Estate of

DONALD SEWARD CAMPBELL, deceasedUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Plaintiff,

-against-A.O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et ah, Index No. 190319/2010

Defendants.

— x

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2017

BELLUCK & FOX, LHP CLYDE & CO US LLP

9̂̂By:By:

Peter Dinunzio, Esq.The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel:(212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

jL ?

'4th FloorYork 10036

546 5thNew Y<Tel: (212)^1-1575

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED:LUCY B J.S.C.

FFE OCT 0 9 2018

COUNTY CLEWS OrRCENEW YORK

BARBARA j .s .c .

JUL 1 2 2018

Page 22: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S.Part 46 (Billings, J.)SARA J. DICKERMAN, Individually and as

Administratrix of the Estate of ROBERT H.DICKERMAN, UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERPlaintiff,

-against-IndexNo.101731/2007

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al„

Defendants.

-xWHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

, 2017

BELLUCK & POX, L CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

/ / , Esq-546 5th Ave*oy4th FloorNew York, Npk York 10036Tel: (212)Wl-1575

Attorney for Plaintiffs

F I L E DSO ORDERED:J.S.C.

OCT 0 9 2018BARBARA JAW

1112 2018 COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 23: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK — xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)ADELINE CHOBOT-SPITZER, Executrix of the

Estate of ARMAND DEL CIOPPO and CARMELADEL CIOPPO, Individually, UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERPlaintiff,

-against-IndexNo. 111767/2008

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,Defendants.

— x

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

, 2017

BELLUCK/& fOX, LLP CLYDE & CO US LLP

-3̂ W

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

,Esq.Floor

New lYork, New York 10036Tel:©12*581-1575

546 5th Avi

Attorney for Plaintiffs

/ F I L E DSO ORDERED:LUCY BILONQS, J.S.C.

IJAFFEJ.S.C.BARBA OCT 0 9 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKJUL 12 2018

Page 24: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-xIN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)PAUL COSTELLO and ADELE COSTELLO,

Plaintiffs, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,Index No. 115431/2007

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

, 2017

BELLUCK & FOX, LLP CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:7 Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

546 5th Avenue,WtttrloorNew York, Nfew/Yttk 10036Tel:(212) 681-1/575

Attorney for Plaintiffs

SO ORDERED: F I L E DLUCY DibLINOSrJ.S.C.BARBARA JAFFE

J.S.C. OCT 0 9 2018

COUNTY CUEMK'8 OH iceNEW YOHK

J1L 12 201«r

Page 25: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx

NYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)ELIZABETH J. COONS, Individually and as Executrix

of the Estate of VINCENT W.COONS,deceased,UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Plaintiff,

-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., Index No. 190138/2009

Defendants.

•x

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkA . 2017

BELLUCK &/POX, CLYDE & CO US LLP-3̂By:By:

Peter Dinunzio, Esq.The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

,Esq.546 5th AVNew York,Tel: (212)^1-1575

>e, 4th Floor:w York 10036

Attorney for Plaintiffs

SO ORDERED: F I L E DmerBiELiNGsn.s.c.

BARBARA JAFFfc OCT 0 9 2018j.s.c.

COUNTY CLEWS OH iCENEW YORKJUL 1 2 2018

Page 26: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

xNYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)ARTHUR COFFEY and PATRICIA C. COFFEY,

Plaintiffs, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,Index No. 190077/2008Defendants.

-xWHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs' Complaint against defendantCURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there isno opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOWCONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

/ . 2017

BELLUCK & FOX/LLP CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel:(212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

r__> Esq.

i, 4th Floor/ York 10036

546 i th i ,viNew Yoi kjTel: ( 212n 68^-1575

Attorneyfor Plaintiffs

SO ORDERED:LUCY-BIfcfclNeB, J.S.C.

FEBARBARA JOCT 0 9 2018J.S.C.

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 27: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)NUNZIO BRUSCA,

Plaintiff, UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.Index No. 115429/2007Defendants.

-x

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summary

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

, 2017

BELLUCK & FOX, LLP CLYDE & CO US LLP

By:By:Peter Dinunzio, Esq.

The Chrysler Building405 Lexington Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel:(212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

I I /7 .Esq.546 5th AveijM, 4th FloorNew York, ht/w York 10036Tel:(212) 651-1575

Attorney for Plaintiffs

SO ORDERED: F I L E DmewBimNl rj.s.c.

BARBARA JAFFEJBL 1 2 208 OCT 0 9 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 28: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION— -— x

NYCALI.A.S. Part 46 (Billings, J.)ANN SHARI BEENICK, Individually and as

Executrix of the Estate of THOMAS MICHAELBEENICK, UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERPlaintiff,

-against-Index No.Wm12/2007

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE defendant, CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL requests summaiy

judgment in this action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant

CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is

no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW

CONTROL be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.DatedTYNew York, New York

/ , 2017

LLU 2K & LP CLYDE & Cp US/LLP

By:y:// / Esq.

4th FloorNew York 10036

Peter Efnuijfiq,The Chrysli405 LexingWfo Avenue, 16th FloorNew York, New York 10174Tel: (212) 710-3900Attorney for Defendant Curtiss-Wright FlowControl

q-46 5 lingew

Tfek<212) 681-1575

Attorney for Plaintiffs

:mmSO ORDERED:

LUCY BILb»pS, J.S.C.JAFFE OCT 09 ?nigBARBA1

COUNTY CLERK"" ( )

NEW YOHKi i K :F

Page 29: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ... · 10/9/2018  · i SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK COUNTYOFNEWYORK x INRE:NEWYORKCITYASBESTOSLITIGATION x NYCAL LLOYDJ.STOIK,Individually

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK — - X

NYCALI.A.S.Part 13(Mendez,M.)

NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

IN RE:

X

Index No.: 114377/2002This Document Relates to:

UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

BETSY VAN ORNUM, as Executrix for the Estate ofDAVID W. VAN ORNUM, and BETSY VAN ORNUM,Individually,

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the complaint and

cross-claims against Goodyear Canada Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants

there is no opposition, it isORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Goodyear Canada Inc., are

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

J o l t j I I , 9f )K

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Goodyear Canada Inc.

§

B y:By:Daniel J. Gagliardi, Esq.Adam Dreksler, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED:S'Hon. Manuel J. dczTf.S.C. F I L E D

BARBARA JAFFEOCT 0 9 2018

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

11701rJW