following this cover page are scanned images of no ......mar 07, 2019  · supreme court of the...

39
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers.

Upload: others

Post on 07-Aug-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

Page 2: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

: NYCAL| I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, J.)

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION — j

) ir in'

J

This Document Relates to: MAR 0 5 2019Index No.: 124444/02ORIN E. AGRIFOGLIO,

ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OFGERTRUDE AGRIFOGLIO

PART 13- C/ VIL

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice, and after notice

to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating

Corp., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorkc2 , 1 a , 2019

H- ttcqAttorney for Plaintiffs UOrin E. Agrifoglio, Administrator for theEstate of Gertrude AgrifoglioWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

USoO

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

F I L E DSO ORDERED,

MAR 0 7 2019

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE^^^NEW YORK

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZj .s.c.

Page 3: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

i ;SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY Of NEW YORK

L:

' ' R 0 5 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

: NYCAL| I.A.S. Part 13: (Mendez, J.)

“ 1

NYs cuoST CIVIL

This Document Relates to:; 116204/02Index No.:

THOMAS BRADYAND

KATHLEEN BRADY UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

REFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., requests summary judgment inWHE

the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the

complaint ahd cross-claims against Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., with prejudice, and after notice

to all co-defejndants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co.,

Inc., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkZ . I Z , 2019»

dM.O( ( -es C-t . f<rnusOr\

Attorney for PlaintiffsThomas Brady and Kathleen BradyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantAtwood & Morrill Co., Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

F I L E DSO ORDERED,

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez MAR 0 7 2019

COUNTY CLERK S OFF1C5S3-2890NEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J S C.

Page 4: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

D) Ic? ,'-'ro E 1

- ' A

X MAR 0 5 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX „ PART 13^YS SUPREME COURTThis Document Relates To:

NICOLE ZiVPRZAL, as Representative of the Estate ofPAUL HAMBERGER, Deceased,

Plaintiffs,

-against-AKZO NOBEL PAINTS, LLC, Ek/a The GliddenCompany; et al.,

- CIVIL

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Hon. Manuel J. Mendez)

Index No.: 190616/2012

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent any opposition, all

claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

'zX'L*' \ t5?Dated:New York, New York

TaraL. Pehush, Esq.K<KL GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-60

David A. Chandler, Esq.KARST & VON OISTE, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)576 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10036(212) 76443900 F I L E D

MAR 0 7 2019SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.303031673 v1

Page 5: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

7=3

Dig r.:X' !S!D)IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

0 5 2019XThis Document Relates To:

BARBARA CONNOLLY, as Personal Representativeof the Heirs and Estate of ROBERT L. SIMMS,Deceased,

^ s^du< rNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Hon. Manuel J. Mendez)

Plaintiffs, Index No.: 190386/2011-against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, assuccessor-hy- merger to Buffalo Pumps; et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs’ j complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent any opposition, all

claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.<2.Dated:

New York, New York

David A. Chandler, Esq.KARST & VON OISTE, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs)576 Fifth AvenueNew York!NY 10036(212) 764-3900

TaralL Pehush, Esq.K&L GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030

F I L E DMAR 07 2019

SO ORDERED, COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKHon. Manuel J. Mendez

303031644 v1MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J .S.C.

Page 6: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

nrit:: \ PP- f~:tc:::-i < r/‘ i i VO r\! uX M-4R 0 5 20 J9IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

^SSUPPE^CGJRTXThis Document Relates To: • c/vjL

HELEN T. GORMAN Individually and as PersonalRepresentative of the Heirs and Estate of THOMAS P.GORMAN, Deceased,

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Hon. Manuel J. Mendez)

Index No.: 190116/2011Plaintiffs,

-against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA.O. SMITH CORPORATION; et al.,

* Defendants.x

/

W1EIEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent any opposition, all

claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: 2J 2,y ) reNew York, New York '

David A. Chandler, Esq.KARST & VON OISTE, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)576 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10036(212) 764T3900

TaratL.tPehush, Esq.K&IL GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6<p [ L E D

MAR 07 2019SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKMANUEL J. MENDEZ

J.S.C.303031663 v1

Page 7: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK RJ

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION MAR 0 5 2019XThis Document Relates To: PART 13NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

PAMELA ROBINSON, as Personal Representative ofthe Heirs and Estate of JOSEPH ROBINSON,Deceased,

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Hon. Manuel J.Mendez)

Plaintiffs, Index No.: 190307/2011

-against- NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERAIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, as

successor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS; et al.,Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent any opposition, all

claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed

with prejudice anc( without costs.

Dated: £ 2X 12New York, New York

TaratL/ Pehush, Esq!*

K&E GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030

David A. Chandler, Esq.KARST & VON OISTE, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)576 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10036(212) 764T3900

F I L E DMAR 0 7 2019

r~\SO ORDERED, COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKHon. Manuel J. Mendez

303031692 v1MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J .S .C.

Page 8: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

ralECE^grSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

MAR 0 5 2019X

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYS SUPRPM^COURTX - CIVILThis Document Relates To:

CLAYTON SHANK and ARLENE SHANK, NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Hon.Manuel J. Mendez)Plaintiffs,

-against- IndexNo.: 190408/2010

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, assuccessor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc.; et al.,

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Defendants.

x

WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent any opposition, all

claims and cross claims against defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.Dated:

New York, New York

David A. Chandler, Esq.KARST &VON OISTE, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff(s)576 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10036(212) 764^3900

TaraL.K&lf GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-60F I L E D

MAR 01

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

303031660 v1

Page 9: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

»

SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALIN RE: NEWASBESTOS

YORK CITYLITIGATION I.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)

ALVIN L. BASCOMB and FRANCES BASCOMB, Index No.: 105780/2002

Plaintiffs), UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

-against-A.C. and S., [NC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), ei al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant, ERICSSON, INC., as successor-in-interest to ANACONDA WIRE &

CABLE CO., i/s/h/a “ ERICSSON, INC., Individually, and as successor in interest to Anaconda Wire & Cable

Co.” (hereinafter “ ERICSSON” ), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against Defendant, ERICSSON, with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent of any opposition, all claims and

cross claims against Defendant, ERICSSON, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

•Dated: 30*:2019mw York, New York\ \

Dated: January 30, 2019New York, New York

v

\

V VliHr"Justin WelteWEITZ & LAttorneys for' Plaintiffs,ALVIN BASCOMB and FRANCIS BASCOMB700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003p.: (212) 558-5500f.: (212) 344-5461

S. Tripicco, Esq.HAWKINS PARNELL & YOUNG LLPAttorneys for Defendant,ERICSSON, INC.600 Lexington Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, New York 10022-7678p.: (212) 897-9655f.: (646) 589-8700e.: [email protected] File No.: 2443.284

Mich;sq.,ENBERG, PC

P I L E DSO ORDERED,

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C. MAR 0 7 2019- 1 of 1 -MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J .S .C .COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

Page 10: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

7 i c=SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

MAR 0 5 2019

“ J ..— XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) PART 13

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILXLYNNE ROSEN, as Personal Representative for theEstate of ERIK JENSEN,

Index No.: 106861/2000

Plaintiff(s), UNOPPOSEDSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER-against-

A.C. and S.|INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.,

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, Defendant, ERICSSON, INC., as successor-in-interest to ANACONDA WIRE &

CABLE CO., i/s/h/a “ ERICSSON, INC., Individually, and as successor in interest to Anaconda Wire &

Cable Co.” (hereinafter “ ERICSSON” ), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against Defendant,

ERICSSON, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

BRED, that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent of any opposition, all claims andORD

cross claims against Defendant, ERICSSON, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: Z j HNew York, New York

Dated:New York, New

, 2019 ,2019/

\t /

. Tripicco, Esq.S PARNELL & YOUNG, LLP

MichaeHAWK600 Lexington Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, New York 10022P: (212) 897-9655F: (646) 589-8700Attorneys for DefendantERICSSON, INC.

is, Esq.feNBERG, P.C.

Ambre J. BnmiWEITZ & LU:700 BroadwayNew York, Nbw York 10003P: (212) 558-5500F: (212) 344-5461Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)

F I L E Dr̂ \SO ORDERED,MAR 0 7 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 11: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

05 2019V i.- 1: \

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 120397/01

JOSEPH A. IANNUZZELLIUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice, and after notice

to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating

Corp., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New (York, New YorkaUCL ? 2019

dJAArufs M. fAttorney for PlaintiffsJoseph A. lannuzzelliWEITZ & LIJXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

KjUSQ> r\

SO ORDERED,

F I L E DHon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J . MENDEZJ . S.C.

2383-24973XMAR 0 7 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 12: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY O^ NEW YORK

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

MAR 0 5 20 :3This Document Relates to:Index No.: 116052/02 r;\

RALPH CESTARE, AS PROPOSEDEXECUTOR FOR THE ESTATE OF

AGNES CESTARE UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the

complaint anld cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice, and after notice

to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating

Corp., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorka , \ Q , 2019

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for Defendant

Ralph Cestare, As Proposed Executor for the Tishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.

k>U FergusonAttorney for Plaintiffs ^es

Estate of Agnes CestareWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

F I L E Drr\ m » 7 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

2383-25745

Page 13: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME ct>URT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ‘-f

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

: NYCALI I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, J.)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 119267/97

ALMA CHASSE, ADMINISTRATRIXFOR THE ESTATE OF

NORMAN CHASSE UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint

and cross-claims against Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-

defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc.,

are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkSLi \ CL , 2019

Attorney for Plaintiffs ^Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for Defendant

Alma Chasse, Administratrix for the Estate of Courter & Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Norman ChasseWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

F i LSO ORDERED,

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez MAR 0 7 2019

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S .C.

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE H22-14783NEW YORK

Page 14: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL! I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, J.)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 119267/97

ALMA CHASSE, ADMINISTRATRIXFOk THE ESTATE OF

NORMAN CHASSE UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, requests summary judgment in the

above-entitle4 action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint

and cross-claims against Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-

defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Treadwell Corporation,

are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York' 2019

C/Uat lcs f^rc\usa n Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for Plaintiffs ^ Attorney for DefendantAlma Chasse, Administratrix for the Estate of Treadwell Corporation

MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300

Norman ChaiseWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

F l L E DWAR 01SO ORDERED,

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.c.

Page 15: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF^ NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL| I.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)

;.i 'i ! •' I

1 MAR 0 5 2019This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190309/11

NYS SJW

DIANE POMARICO, AS EXECUTRIX iFOR THE ESTATE OF ENEA CARTELLI i UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

! JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint

and cross-claims against Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-

defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Treadwell Corporation,

are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkA f l Q L , 2019

CJnctc I es H. rerwdSonAttorney for Plaintiffs JDiane Pomarico, as Executrix for the Estate of Treadwell Corporation

MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for Defendant

Enea CartelliWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

F \ U E °SO ORDERED,M /VR 0 T ^Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C.

1235-23741

Page 16: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

"i

ITU

MAR 0 5 2019This Docume it Relates to:Index No.: 190309/11

NYS SUP," : ,, I ; :T

DIANE POMARICO, AS EXECUTRIX ;FOR THE ESTATE OF ENEA CARTELLI j UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

i JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint

and cross-claims against Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-

defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc.,

are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York£ 2019

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for Defendant

Diane Pomaijico, as Executrix for the Estate of Courter & Company, Inc.Enea CartelliWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Attorney for Plaintiffs

MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

F I L E DC—\SO ORDERED, MAR 0 7 2019

CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK 1122-24087

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

COUNTYMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

Page 17: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

Li :SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAR 6 5 2019IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

NYS - G MT - CIVIL

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 190309/11

DIANE PC MARICO, AS EXECUTRIX :FOR THE ESTATE OF ENEA CARTELLI j UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

i JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., improperly plead as Weir Valve

and Controls USA, Inc, requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims against Atwood

& Morrill Co., Inc., improperly plead as Weir Valve and Controls USA, Inc, with prejudice, and

after notice tq all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co.,

Inc., improperly plead as Weir Valve and Controls USA, Inc, are dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorka , i a , 2 0 1 9

I

CM\&r( -csAttorney for [Plaintiffs

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for Defendant

Diane Pomaijico, as Executrix for the Estate of Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., improperly pleadEnea CartelliWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

as Weir Valve and Controls USA, IncMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

MAR 0 7 2019SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICEMANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S .C . 963-840

Page 18: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

r

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAR 0 5 2019; NYCAL

I I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, J.)

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

fv'YS SiJP

This Document Relates to:Index No.:

WARD A. REYNOLDSAND

CAROL REYNOLDS UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint

and cross-claims against Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-

defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Treadwell Corporation,

are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkKJA , 2019

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attorney for Plaintiffs •— zWard A. Reynolds and Carol ReynoldsWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

F I L E DSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MAR 0 7 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J .S .C .

1235-25024COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

Page 19: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

'

N

l rSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

u [.[— j

ii

I MAR 0 5 2019NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

Fv'.- C r >r'JYS SUPP. O .V;:cr;^ rThis Document Relates to:

Index No.: 113566/02JOHN S. BAUMAN, AS EXECUTRORFOR THE ESTATE OF FRANKLIN E.

BAUMAN SR., AND JOHN S. BAUMANAS EXECUTOR FOR THE ESTATE OF

BERNICE BAUMAN

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

REFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, requests summary judgment in theWHE

i action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaintabove-entitle

and cross-claims against Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-

defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Treadwell Corporation,

are dismissec. with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2019

CUajhfs.M. f<rqusf >r*Attorney for Plaintiffs -7

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for Defendant

John S. Bauman, as Executror for the Estate of Treadwell CorporationFranklin E. Bauman Sr., and John S. Bauman MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.as Executor for the Estate of Bernice BaumanWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwdyNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

F I LMAR 0 7 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

1235-18474

Page 20: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK r Ir -ma r •. t i

, u. i.

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

: NYCAL! I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, J.)

MAR 0 5 2013This Document Relates to: NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index No.: 115908/00STEPHANIE R. ZANGAKIS, AS

EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OFSILVERIO BONELLI, AND STEPHANIE j UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERR. ZANGKIS, INDIVIDUALLY

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice, and after notice

to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating

Corp., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York3L , \SL , 2019

o n Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

M.Attorney for PlaintiffsStephanie R. Zangakis, as Executrix for theEstate of Silverio Bonelli, and Stephanie R.Zangkis, IndividuallyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500 F I L E DSO ORDERED, MAR 0 7 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S .C.

2383-2961

Page 21: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

!!r.P fPPI; T -1.J '

: NYCAL| I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, J.)

MAR 0 5 2019

NYS SUPF: 3 : t f CXr.This Document Relates to: CIVIL

Index No.: 113567/02

WILLIAM C. BOYLEUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint

and cross-claims against Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-

defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc.,

are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York( & , 2019

dt/ xades. M - FaoMSonAttorney for Plaintiffs ^William C. BoyleWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

F I L E DSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MAR 0 7 2019MANUEL J. MENDEZ

J .S .C .

1122-7104COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICE

NEW YORK

Page 22: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK IJII • I

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

MAR 0 5 ?0i9

i<jJ::

This Document Relates to: 'i t — i

Index No.: 113567/02

W LLIAM C. BOYLEUNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, requests summary judgment in the

above-entitlec action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint

and cross-claims against Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-

defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Treadwell Corporation,

are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2019

CM driesAttorney for Plaintiffs -JWilliam C. BoyleWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

wsor>

F I L E DSO ORDERED,

MAR 0 7 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C

1235-6608

Page 23: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

i fm ii ..

: NYCAL! I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, J.)

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION fvlAR 0 5 2019

This Document Relates to: : ; Jr ; <

Index No.: 116204/02THOMAS BRADY

ANDKATHLEEN BRADY UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint

and cross-claims against Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-

defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc.,

are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2019

(2MQ( UFS NY (-eraAttorney for Plaintiffs JThomas Brae y and Kathleen BradyWEITZ & LU> ENBERG, P.C.

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez MAR 0 7 2019

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S .C .

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

1122-24604

Page 24: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

ID ; i r r nSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

ij Li ;;

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

MAR 0 5 2013NVS SUr ')- .j;:This Document Relates to: j

Index No.: 116204/02THOMAS BRADY

ANDKATHLEEN BRADY UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint

and cross-claims against Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice, and after notice to all co-

defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Treadwell Corporation,

with prejudice and without costs.are dismissed

Dated: New York, New York12 , 2019

CJ/l&(ie5 M- tetau&CiAttorney for Plaintiffs — 'Thomas Brady and Kathleen BradyWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Manuel JSO ORDERED, MAR #1 2019

COUNTY CLERKS OFFICENEW YORK

. MendezHon.

MANUEL J. MENDEZj.s.c.

1235-24925

Page 25: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

MAR 0 5 2319

:This Document Relates to:Index No.: 114016/02

JOHN R. CARR AND SAMUEL J. CARR,AS CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVESFOR THE EiSTATE OF JOSEPH E. CARR UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the

d cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice, and after noticecomplaint an

to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating

Corp., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkA, (q , 2019

dMoacs M. ftrqU5Q <nAttorney for Plaintiffs JJohn R. Catr and Samuel J. Carr, as Co-Personal Representatives for the Estate of MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York(212) 509-3456

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.

Joseph E. CarrWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, N ew York 10003(212) 558-5500

0

MAR 0 7 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKSO ORDERED,

Hon. Manuel J . Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C .

2383-25712

Page 26: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY Oti NEW YORK

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

trn r

j MAR 6 5 2019This Document Relates to:Index No.: 122052/02 SUPr.'SME COURT - ClTiLWILLIAM S. ALLEN, AS EXECUTOR

FOR THE ESTATE OFGEORGE E. ALLEN UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., requests summary judgment in

:itled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing thethe above-en

complaint and cross-claims against Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice, and after notice

to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Tishman Liquidating

Corp., are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkO\ , 2019

Cka/ tes .H - ferousoc\Attorney tor Tamtiils JWilliam S. AGeorge E. AllenWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Kerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for Defendant

lien, as Executor for the Estate of Tishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

a-MAR 0 7 2.019

CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

COUNTY2383-25800

Page 27: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME C<t>URT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK nm

i ! \ 7 IIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBEJSTOS LITIGATION: NYCAL| I.A.S. Part 13i (Mendez, J.)

MAR 0 5 2019This Document Relates to: NYS SU ; : ''-' "YURT - CIVIL

Index No.: 113566/02JOHN S. BAUMAN, AS EXECUTRORFOR THE ESTATE OF FRANKLIN E.

BAUMAN SR., AND JOHN S. BAUMANAS EXECUfTOR FOR THE ESTATE OF

BERNICE BAUMAN

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint

and cross-claims against Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice, and after notice to all co-

defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc.,

are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkiZ . IK-, 2019

Attorney for PlaintiffsKerryann M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for Defendant

John S. Bauman, as Executror for the Estate of Courter & Company, Inc.Franklin E. Bauman Sr., and John S. Bauman MCGIVNEY, KLUGER & COOK, P.C.

80 Broad Street-Suite 2300as Executor for the Estate of Bernice BaumanNew York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

MAR 0 7 2019WTV CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

SO ORDERED, COHNHon. Manuel J. Mendez

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S.C.

1122-19010

Page 28: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

i [ ir's mSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAR 0 5 2019

IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCALPAR;

NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVIL

Index No.: 190488/2011GENE SPINELLI and JOAN SPINELLI,

Plaintiffs,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

- against -A.L. EASTMOND & SONS, INC., et at.,

Defendants — xIMmmmm\immmmmmm*

WHEREFORE, defendant Easco Boiler Corp., individually, and as successor to A.L.Eastmond & Sons, Inc., (“ Easco” ), requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims

against Easco with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant Easco are dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

\ Si / /*> 2019

By:By:Joseph W.1 QK\X(M,

Jordan C. F o( , ^sq.BELLUCKpeO*, LLPAttorneys foVplaintiffsGene Spinelli and Joan Spinelli546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036(212) 681-1575

Benjamin E. Haglund, Esq.DAY PITNEY LLPAttorneys for defendantEasco Boiler Corp., individually and assuccessor to A.L. Eastmond & Sons, Inc.7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036(212) 297-5800

S'

F I L E DSO ORDEREDManuel Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C. MAR 0 7 2019

99559134.1 COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 29: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

Lriu

V" ' i 0 5 ?ni9SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY Qlj NEW YORKIn Re: NEW{'ORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

~

BEATRICE SHEA, Individually and as ProposedExecutrix for the Estate of FREDERICK AMES,

NYCAL |I.A.S. Part IT(Mendez, J.)

Index No.: 123777/2000Plaintiffs,

- against - UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDERA.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY),| et al.,

Defendants.

WH^IREFORE, defendant H.B. FULLER COMPANY requests summary judgment in

the above-eiptitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the

complaint apd cross-claims against H.B. Fuller Company with prejudice, and after notice to all

co-defendaiits there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant H.B. Fuller Company are

dismissed \yith prejudice and without costs.

Dated: , 2019NeW York, New York

^ ^ ( .u-Js p _— Adam'S. Dreksler,-Esq^ Terance R. Calcagno, EsqQ^LSEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantH.B. Fuller Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

/'ASO ORDERED,Manuel J . Mendez, J .S.C. MAR 0 7 2019

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C. COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

Page 30: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

j' rnIO » »LTUSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORKJ \ •'

MAR 05 2019NYCAL 1I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.) j 1

In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONKENNETH THOMAS BRAKO,

Plaintiff, Index No.: 108714/2001120251/1999- against -

UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDERA.C. and S., INC., et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant H.B. FULLER COMPANY requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing thecomplaint and cross-claims against H.B. Fuller Company with prejudice, and after notice to allco-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant H.B. Fuller Company aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.

2-0\°\~201sDated: 02- / 1 C\

iw York, New York

Admm 0. Di'ck3lcp<UWEITZ & LU^ENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5560

Terance R. Calcagno, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantH.B. Fuller Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

sq.

F I L E D/^\SO ORDERED,MAR 0 7 2019Manuel J. Mendez, J .S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ .S .C.

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 31: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

s r • • »L,'' > L, !LI. t\. ; !II ! r -/

;!11 J ii :f * r : i

u.• •!

-5:

SEGAL MCCAMBRID6E S S i G E $ m AJNFYt. .. -IWT

Page 32: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

4

£(SRMAR 0 5 2019

D. \

SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

PAH ” ; jNYS SUPREME COURT • CIVIL

NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 13

(Mendez, J.)

Index No.: 105780/2002ALVIN L. BASCOMB and FRANCES BASCOMB,

PlaintifF(s), UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant, ERICSSON, INC., as successor-in-interest to ANACONDA WIRE &

CABLE CO., i/s/h/a “ ERICSSON, INC., Individually, and as successor in interest to Anaconda Wire & Cable

(hereinafter “ ERICSSON” ), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against Defendant, ERICSSON, with

Co.”

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that, upon prior notice to all co-defendants, and absent of any opposition, all claims and

cross claijns against Defendant, ERICSSON, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: 20*12019New York, New York

Dated: January 30, 2019New York, New York

S. Tripicco, Esq.HAWKINS PARNELL & YOUNG LLPAttorneys for Defendant,ERICSSON, INC.600 Lexington Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, New York 10022-7678p.: (212) 897-9655f.: (646) 589-8700e.: [email protected] File No.: 2443.2847

JustinWEITZ & Lb^ENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiffs,ALVIN BASCOMB and FRANCIS BASCOMB700 BroadwayNew Yorlc, New York 10003p.: (212) 558-5500f.: (212) 344-5461

sq.

F I L E DSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZ l o f l . MAR 0 7 2019. •*.

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 33: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

r-. ?::-j --f .: n i1! ISf vSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

• . * i

! MAR 0 5 201?xIN RE: i NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 13(Mendez, J.)

! NVS SU:>- c

X

MICHAEL YANIS, as Administrator for the Estate ofWALTER P. YANIS,

Index No.: 102373/99

February 2017 FIFOWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Plaintiffs,

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA.C. & S. INC., et al.,

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint andcross-claims against defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkMarch ( , 20( Cf

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. TANENBAUM KEALE LLP

By: Adam Dreksler, Esq.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

fify: Michael A. TanenbaufeyEsq.Attorneys for Foster Wheeler LLCThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DSO ORDERED,Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C.

MAR 07 2019

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 34: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

Ni

Page 35: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

ri) f|^ /7|rSUPREME toURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY qF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

MAR 0 5 2019X

NYCALPart 13(Mendez, J.)

PART j

! MVS SUPREME COX

MICHAEL YANIS, as Administrator for the Estate ofWALTER P. YANIS,

Index No.: 102373/99

February 2017 FIFOWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Plaintiffs,

-against-UNOPPOSED SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA.C. & S. INC., et al.,

Defendants.- x

WHEREFORE, defendant CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse ElectricCorporation (hereinafter: “ CBS Corporation” ), requests summary judgment in the above-entitled action,pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims againstdefendant CBS CORPORATION with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is noopposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross claims against defendant CBS CORPORATION aredismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkMflvd/L l ,2D|Q|

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. TANENBAUM KEALE LLP

By: Adam Dreksler, Esq.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Sfy: Michael A. Tanenbaifta) Esq.Attorneys for CBS CorporationThree Gateway Center, Suite 1301100 Mulberry StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

F I L E DSO ORDERED,

MAR 0 7 2019Hon. Manuel Mendez, J.S.C.

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S.C .

Page 36: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK '" 9 0 5 2019

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)x

WALTER E. POTOCKI,Index No.: 190032/2012

Plaintiff(s),UNOPPOSEDSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONANDORDER

-agains

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,Defendants.

x

WHEFEFORE, defendant BW/IP, Inc. requests summary judgment in the above- entitled

action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing the complaint and cross-claims

against BW/IP, Inc. with prejudice, and after notice to all co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and cross-claims against defendant BW/IP, Inc. are dismissed

with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, NY

Uo/ f

Adam Pr4cijter^oq. T^rnrl "5WEITZ &Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Michael J. Testa, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER &MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant BW/IP, Inc.850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022

NBERG, PC

/''ASO ORDERED,MANUEL MENDEZ, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ.S .C .

Page 37: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

• \ f

SEGAL MCCAMBRiDGE SINGER & MAHONEY*

/

I

:

Page 38: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAR 0 5 2013In Re: NEW ^ORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL

I.A.S. Part 13(Mendez, J.)

rVv'ir.;vs COYY ! - u si.ELIZABETH KELLY, as Executrix for the Estate

of DONALD P. KELLY, and ELIZABETHKELLY, Individually, Index No.: 110740/2006

Plaintiffs,UNOPPOSED SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

- against -A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant H.B. FULLER COMPANY requests summary judgment inthe above-entitled action, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing the

complaint and cross-claims against H.B. Fuller Company with prejudice, and after notice to all

co-defendants there is no opposition, it is

ORDERED that all claims and

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.cross claims against defendant H.B. Fuller Company are

ni •Dated: , 2019New York, New York

Terance R. Calcagno, E$q.

SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantH.B. Fuller Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500

Charles M. Forguoon, Ejiq.- AIo&TAWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-55(1)0

A

SO ORDERED,Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C.

MANUEL J. MENDEZJ . S .C .

Page 39: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ......Mar 07, 2019  · SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: NYCAL | I.A.S. Part 13 i (Mendez, J. IN RE: NEW

-A77!t 'Gb< ' !=y?

! r. » ?

/(

L/FEB 2 8 2019U. L <• *) - i

i

SEGAL MCCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY