rapid damage mapping for post-earthquake building …shinozuka.eng.uci.edu/remote_sensing_2003/keiko...

51
Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response Rapid Damage Mapping for Post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment Keiko Saito, Robin Spence The Martin Centre for Architectural and Urban Studies University of Cambridge Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response September 12 2003

Upload: truongliem

Post on 06-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

Rapid Damage Mapping for Post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment

Keiko Saito, Robin Spence The Martin Centre for Architectural and Urban Studies

University of Cambridge

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster ResponseSeptember 12 2003

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 2

Objective

Develop methodologies to create a post-earthquake rapid building damage map using high-resolution optical satellite images by

combining

• Visual Interpretation• Automatic remote sensing techniques

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 3

• Pilot project Using remote sensing for post disaster damage assessment”, funded by EPSRC, UK.

• Case study carried out in Gujarat, India

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 4

Questions

• Main focus on post earthquake building damage assessment• According to a study, “70-80% success rate using semi-automatic

techniques”• Can visual interpretation do better? • Can a method that combines both achieve better results? • What kind of semi-automatic methods can be used to assess

damages to buildings?• What kind of damage maps will be useful for search and rescue or

during the reconstruction phase?

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 5

Satellite images acquired for pilot project

1m B&W

1m B&W

Image type

IKONOS2

IKONOS2

Satellite

OXBhuj

OOAhmedabad

PostPrePlace name

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 6

Sample IKONOS image

(left) Full view of IKONOS 1m panchromatic satellite image of west Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, taken on 27 January 2001, a day after the earthquake. Covers121km2.

Zoom in of the image

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 7

Which is better?

Panchromatic image(from Reuters web page)Multispectral image

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 8

Three visual interpretation experiments using the satellite images

Experiment 1 - Comparison study using ground photos and post-earthquake IKONOS satellite image of Bhuj

Experiment 2 - Comparison study using pre- and post-earthquake images of Ahmedabad

Experiment 3 - Area based damage assessment study

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 9

Experiment 1 Comparison study using ground photos and post earthquake satellite image of Bhuj

Methodology

Compare ground photos of a damaged building and satellite image showing the same building, to see what type and level of damage can be identified in an IKONOS image

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 10

Image interpretation

Chris Going (Cambridge Architectural Research)

Michael Markus (University of Karlsruhe)

Keiko Saito (The Martin centre, University of Cambridge)

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 11

Location of buildings recorded using handheld GPS single measurement (red dots).

Ground photos of 24 buildings taken approximately a week after the earthquake by Michael Markus.

IKONOS 1m panchromatic Date & Time: 2/2/2001, 6:05am Processing Level: Geometrically CorrectedPositional accuracy: 50m Map Projection: UTM 42 NDatum: WGS84Pixel Size: resampled to 1mSun angle: 45o

Area size: 100km2

Supplied by Space Imaging Middle East.

Data sources

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 12

Evaluating building damage using ground photos

Parapet and wall have fallen off

Middle part has collapsed

Cracksin the wall

Balcony walls have fallen off

Roof collapse

Water tank has fallen off

Heap of rubble

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 13

Comparison with satellite image

Observations•Balcony walls fallen off•Roof collapse•Partial collapse•Big pile of rubble•Roof and wall fallen off•Cracks in the wall•Damage to water tank

Building no.43Visible•Displacement of thewater tank

Not Visible•Shadow is hiding the rubble•Partial collapse in the middle section not clear•Damage to walls not visible

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 14

Create Database

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 15

ResultsTypes of visible damages

1. Totally collapsed buildings.

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 16

However, if the building is located in a built up area, it is difficult to identify

even if the building had totally collapsed.

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 17

2. Tilted buildings

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 18

3. Displacement of Building Appendages

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 19

4. Split in the middle of a high-rise building

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 20

5. Overturned buildings

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 21

6. Debris

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 22

Effect of shadows

Shadows can hide information

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 23

Shadows could be used to estimate building height

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 24

Non-visible damage

Lower Storey collapse

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 25

Damages on low rise buildings

Low rise buildings tend to have small area size

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 26

Damages on buildings located in built up areas

Possible, but difficult without the help of ground photos.

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 27

Summary

Not visible

Damages in built up areas, even totally collapsed (difficult without pre-damage image or ground photo)Damages hidden in the shadowsDamages on walls (cracks etc)Damages on low rise buildingsStorey collapse

Visible

Totally collapsed single buildingsHeavily tilted buildingsWater tank displacementSplit in the middle of a high risebuildingTurned over buildingsDebris Shadows (shape and height)

High rise buildings Low rise buildings, built up areas

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 28

Experiment 2 – Comparison study using pre and post earthquake IKONOS images

Methodology

Comparison between the pre- and post- image

Grid-by-grid damage assessment of West-Ahmedabad

Pre-EQ image Post-EQ image

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 29

Possible to find collapsed and severely damaged buildings

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 30

Collapsed buildings

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 31

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 32

Out of the 12 collapsed buildings found,10 had collapsed, 2 had not collapsed. Took 15 hours to complete assessment

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 33

Experiment 3 – Area based damage assessment study

Methodology

Carry out a grid by grid damage assessment only using the post-earthquake image

Assign a damage level toeach grid based on a pre-defined classification

Result of area-based damage assessment

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 34

Damage classification methodology

Transparent0No buildings/ water/

outside study area

Dark Brown475-100%

Pink350-75%

Gray225-50%

Yellow10-25%

Fill colourAssigned damage level

Percentage of collapsed buildings (D4 or D5 EMS

scale) within a grid

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 35

Result of visual damage interpretation

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 36

Comparison with ground survey result

EPC ground survey resultVisual interpretation

“General damage pattern agrees with the ground survey”

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 37

Discrepancy

153126Total

3425212401-1

Number of gridsDiscrepancy

General tendency to underestimate – need for training

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 38

Analysis of the discrepancy

Resampling method to be blamed?

Original EPC damage map Resampled EPC damage map

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 39

North part of Walled city has many low-rise buildings in a densely built-up area

Grids with 3 (yellow) and 2 (light blue) levels of discrepancy. The map is the original EPC damage survey

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 40

Better results in the south, where there are many modern middle to high rise buildings Grids that match EPC survey results

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 41

Implications

Resolution of IKONOS images are good enough to be used for visualinterpretation

-Develop an easy-to-use visual damage assessment manual- How can the accuracy of the assessment be improved?

Limitations include;-shadows-built up areas, small buildings -weather (cloud cover)-availability of pre-event imagery

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 42

Next Phase

• Concentrate on the use of post-event images only.

• Visual interpretation – continue to accumulate experience using other data sets, modify area-based assessment classification method

• Experiment on semi-automatic remote sensing techniques – stereo viewing using pre- and post-event imagery, extraction of building footprints using edge detection techniques, unsupervised classification, supervised classification, texture analysis and rectification in the horizontal and vertical planes.

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 43

Elements in the process of creating a rapid damage map

1. Obtaining information on the building stock e.g. footprints, function of the building, height, area size, material of building.

2. Assessment of the damage to each building, e.g. total collapse, tilted, lower storey collapse.

3. Creating the damage map, e.g. area-based damage mapping, building-by-building damage mapping, mapping of the roads.

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 44

Quick Bird images of Bourmerdes23rd May 03 18th June 03

Collapsed buildingsTilted buildings

Area-based damage assessment carried out on the images from two different dates. The two images look quite different due to the debris been cleared.

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 45

Observed change between the May and June images

23rd May 18th June

Additional damage was observed on the image from June. Note the difference in the look angle as well.

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 46

Comparison with the IKONOS images of Gujarat cities

Ahmedabad, 29th January 01 Walled city-Bhuj, 2nd February 01 Bourmerdes, 18th June 03

•Different morphology of the three cites •Difference in building density – less obstruction by the shadows in Bourmerdes image•Façade visible in Ahmedabad image – look angle is 61 degrees – ideal for visual interpretation, not ideal for change detection

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 47

Multispectral images

•Spatial resolution not good enough to be used as it is for visual interpretation of damage to buildings•The colours can help understand the nature of the object – in this case, tents. •Other use – NDVI (to exclude vegetation), material of buildings

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 48

GPSUsing high-resolution satellite images as a map

• “Satellite image map” created using standard GIS software.• Used to reach sites with collapsed buildings.• Especially useful in areas where readily made maps are not available.

Location of sites with

potential collapsed buildings

Upload/ Download positional data with your GPS

Coordinates of the

building sites can be displayed. (in this case, UTM)

Major Road names

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 49

Other potentially useful tool

Stereo imagery

• No case studies yet (using satellite imagery).

• Expensive

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 50

Obstacles of using optical satellite images?

• Cloud cover, Smoke, Shadows, Tall buildings, Built up areas • In such case, other means of detecting damage should be considered.

• However, the majority of the major earthquakes in the last few years were, or could have been, covered by cloud free satellite images, e.g. Kobe, Northridge, Kocaeli, Seattle, Gujarat, Miyagi and Bourmerdes.

high probability of cloud free coverage?

Workshop on the Application of Remote Sensing Technologies to Disaster Response

12 September 2003 Rapid Damage Mapping for post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment 51

Conclusion

• The use of high-resolution optical satellite images for damage mapping is feasible. Should be further pursued.

• Research collaboration for rapid acquisition of satellite imageswould be useful.

• Acquisition of ground truth data is time consuming. Negotiations can be delicate. Could be assisted by international associations such as EERI. Agreements offering reciprocal benefits to the provider of

ground truth information likely to be needed.