radiation protection learned from fukushima daiich npp ...fukushima no.1 nuclear power plant 2...
TRANSCRIPT
Radiation Protection learned from Fukushima Daiich NPP Accident
Toshiso KOSAKO
AOARP president (The University of Tokyo)
AOCRP-4 Kuala Lumpur 11 May 2014
Mourn for Victims We would like to express our mourn for victims of earthquake, tsunami and NPP accident. : around 20,000 death. We would like to express our appreciation for the world-wide support of Japan from all over the world.
Great East Japan Earthquake 14:16, March 11, 2011 Magnitude 9.0 More than twenty thousands Death and missing people More than forty hundreds of thousands Evacuees
Fukushima-Daiichi No.1
BWR type reactor
Reactor container
Reactor ceiling
Damaged part by
hydrogen explosion
Fukushima No.1 Nuclear Power Plant (BWR)
Fukushima No.1 Nuclear Power Plant
2
Fukushima-Dai-ichi NPP accident
Release of Radioactivity from Fukushima No.1 NPP
• 放射能漏れ事故後には、放射性核種が環境中へ放出される。
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
3/11
14:
00
3/11
20:
00
3/12
2:0
0
3/12
8:0
0
3/12
14:
00
3/12
20:
00
3/13
2:0
0
3/13
8:0
0
3/13
14:
00
3/13
20:
00
3/14
2:0
0
3/14
8:0
0
3/14
14:
00
3/14
20:
00
3/15
2:0
0
3/15
8:0
0
3/15
14:
00
3/15
20:
00
3/16
2:0
0
3/16
8:0
0
3/16
14:
00
3/16
20:
00
3/17
2:0
0
3/17
8:0
0
3/17
14:
00
3/17
20:
00
3/18
2:0
0
3/18
8:0
0
3/18
14:
00
Are
al D
ose
(μ
Sv/
h)
日時
Areal dose around Fukushima 1 nuclear power plant (NISA, TEPCO)
保安院 MP2
保安院 MP4
東電 正門
東電 MP1
東電 MP2
東電 MP4
東電 MP8
保安院 MP1北側
東電 MP3
東電 MP5
東電 MP6
保安院 正門
東電 事務本館北
東電 西門
保安院 事務本館北
保安院 西門
保安院 体育館
11Mar 16Mar
No1.
hydrogen
explosion
炉停止
No3.hydroge
n explosion No2 Cont-
Vessel Damage
No3 White
Smoke
No4 R-
Building
Damage
No.1
vent No3
ventト
No.2
vent
12日未明
1号機
炉水位低下
14日未明
2号機
炉水位低下
13日未明
3号機
炉水位低下
14Mar20:00-
No.2 All fuel dry
✔Extraordinary large external event
Earthquake (Magnitude 9.0), Tsunami (20m)
Station blackout > Core melt down
✔EPZ (Emergency Preparation Zone)
2km radius > 5km > 10km > 20km : 1-2 days
✔Off-Site Center (Substantial Center)
Government + Local G. + NPP + Media
The distance, around 5km
Earthquake, Tsunami > damage
Radiation plume, High radiation dose > can’t use
Move to Fukushima prefectural capital (100km)
What happened in Fukushima?
✔Reactor
Coolant supply, Emergency workers (Dose limit)
Firemen, soldier etc.
✔Environment
Emergency monitoring, Huge number of data,
Information sharing, Straggle between organization
✔Inhabitants
Delivery of information, Iodine pill application,
Collection of corpses, Domestic animals and
house pets
✔Mass media and general public
Bashing and sensational, > impact to the Cabinet,
NISA, MEXT, NSC, Local Gov.
What happened in Fukushima?
✔Early stage countermeasure
Too much insist of 100mSv
Food control
✔Middle period countermeasure
Too much insist of 20mSv
Decontamination (>Cleanup) of environment
Food control
✔Long term countermeasure
Risk communication, Children‘s problem,
Compensation of the disasters
Environment, forest, farmland reform
✔Rebuilding of the safety department
Joining of NISA, NSC and others
Positioning of the Nuclear Power Plants in electric supply
NISA, MEXT, NSC, Local Gov.
What happened in Fukushima?
A state of confusion after the accident
19 October 2011 ©
ENELA
10
• Future step is unclear, even a week later
• Engagement of the Government, awkward
• Role of the local Government, awkward
Sheltering and Evacuation
• Permitted level of food?, Reasonability? Flexibility?
• pollution level for planting soil
• pollution of seawater for marine products
Food and Drink
Control
• Accurate dose estimation of residents
• Uncertainty of low dose health effect to man
Influence on public health
• Termination procedure is unclear Termination of the
Declaration of Emergency
Event Reasons
Dose Limitation
for Emergency Workers
Details
– Japanese regulation; 100 mSv
– Submitted a question of limitation
change from 100 to 250 mSv to
Radiation Protection Board for deliberation. (March 14).
Approved in a shot time (2hours) by NRC.
– On March 26, Industrial Minister declared a new vale of
250 mSv for emergency worker’s dose limit.
Setting of Evacuation
Area
• Details
– Application of 20 mSv/year
– Planned evacuation area:
Lower value among 20-100 mSv/y reference level
at emergency exposure situation by ICRP Pub. 103
(2007 recommendation).
– On the other hand, same 20 mS/y was applied as a guide
for use of school ground, which was an upper value of
reference level of 1-20 mSv/y in an existing exposure
situation
Prediction of Radionuclide Diffusion
at a Nuclear Emergency
• Details
– Worse Use of System for Prediction of
Environmental Emergency Dose
Information(SPEEDI)
– The hard case to determine the source
term of radionuclide release
– No use of SPEEDI result to use an
emergency countermeasure for the dose
reduction of refugee exposure
– Information opening to the public by foreign
organizations
– Weather authorities or nuclear authorities, in
Germany, UK, France, Austria etc.
Deposition of I-131 (00:00, March 25, 2011)
Processing and Disposal of
Wastes after the Disaster
Details --Tentative guidance By Nuclear Safety
Commission (NSC) June 3. 2011 – 10 µSv/y, for recycle and reuse goods
– 1 mSv/y, workers for collecting, transportation and storage.
– 1 mSv/y, workers for waste processing
– Disposal facility, dose for surrounding residents after the facility closure
10 µSv/y on basic scenario
0.3 mSv/y on variation scenario
– Basic concept “Policy on the disaster waste treatment in Fukushima Prefecture”, by Environment Ministry , June 23, 2011
– Presupposition: “Guarantee of the Safety “
of workers and surrounding residents for the operation
of incineration plants and final disposal facilities
– If in case of no satisfaction of the guidance by NSC:
After taking an appropriate temporal storage, the regulatory
authority should immediately investigate a safety disposal measure
Control of Contaminated
Foods and Drinks
• Details
– Intervention Level on the
Intake Limitation of Foods
and Drinks
+ Thyroid Equivalent Dose by Radio-Iodine: 50 mSv
– Specific iodine deposition to thyroid
+ Effective Dose by Radio-Cesium: 5 mSv
Committed Dose (mSv/y)
Effective Dose Equivalent Dose (Each Organ)
Upper Dose Level 50 500
Lower Dose Level 5 50
ICRP Pub. 40(1984)
Pile of returned Spinach to Scrap
(Tokyo Central Wholesale Market,
March 23)
Food contamination
Other material contamination
Radiation level judgment
on the use of school buildings and
grounds in Fukushima Prefecture
• Details
-Application of 1-20 mSv/year
(Ministry of Education notification on April 19)
Based on ICRP Publ.109
(exposure situation in the emergency)
• CRP Publ.109 (Emergency Exposure Situation)
Application of Reference level 20-100
(lower value of 20 mSv/year)
Changed to Publ.103 (Reference level on a Restoration,
upper value of 20 in 1-20 mSv/y)
• Regular ground use is possible below 3.8μSv/h.
(Derived from 20mSv/y including occupancy factor)
Early stage clean- up (or decontamination)
19 October 2011 ©
ENELA
19
Disaster prevention
① Sheltering h
② Sheltering to concrete building
③ Evacuation
④ Application of stable iodine
⑤ Control of drinking water, milk and food
⑥ Restriction of entry
Countermeasure
Monitoring support in case of Emergency
Monitoring car Survey meters
Evacuation >50mSv
Sheltering >10mSv
Image of countermeasure area
Range of priority area for nuclear disaster
Old : Guideline for Nuclear Disaster New : Guideline for Nuclear Disaster CM
PAZ
About 5 km
About 30 km
About 50 km
UPZ
PPA
Sea
EPZ : Emergency Planning Zone
NPP: 8 – 10 km
Reprocessing P. : 500 m
PAZ : Precautionary Action Zone NPP : about 5 km
UPZ : Urgent Protective action
Planning Zone NPP : about 30 km
Reprocessing P. : about 5 km
PPA : Plume Protection Planning
Area
NPP : about 50 km
(reference value)
Construction of SPEEDI System
放射線の透過力
Copyright © Nuclear Safety Technology Center All Rights Reserved.
Radioactivity release
Conceptual figure of exposure by radiation plume
放射線の透過力
External exposure Internal exposure
Radioactive materials
Concentration,
dose rate ,
Monitoring
Nuclear facilities
Radiation cloud (radiation plume)
Wind direction Wind direction
Deposition
Inhalation
Radiation
Released radioactivity
Fukushima Dai-ichi reactor accident
• Atmospheric release
Iodine-131 5.0 x 1017Bq (500 PBq)
Cesium-137 1.0 x 1016Bq (10 PBq)
• Ocean release
Iodine-131 1.1 x 1016Bq (11 PBq)
Cesium-137 3.6 x 1015Bq (3.6 PBq) 2012.05.24. TEPCO
Chernobyl reactor accident
Iodine-131 1.3 x 1018Bq (1300 PBq)
Cesium-137 8.9 x 1016Bq (89 PBq)
Radioactive waste
Radioactive waste after Fukushima
Dai-ich Nuclear Power Plant
• Nuclear power plant and its site
Debris, damaged fuel, structural materials,,,
• Environment
Fallout (dry & wet deposition)
Decontamination (Clean up)
Soil, Organic substance,,,,
Radioactive waste
Temporal storage
> Intermediate storage
> Final disposal
Land contamination (Cs-137)
From March12, 05:00 to May 1, 00:00
Decontamination special area
F1-
NPP
F2-
NPP
School cleanup
By S.Tanaka
By S.Tanaka
School swimming
pool cleanup
By S.Tanaka
Farmer’s house
cleanup
Decontamination technology
1. Soil
Heat treatment, Classification, Chemical treatment
2. Sewage sludge
Elution
3. Park, road and buildings
Cutting ablation, Washing(nano-bubble, ozone),
High pressure washing (280Mpa), Grinding ablation,
4. Rubble
Triturating washing, Separation by dry ice
5. Plants and cowpat
Compost (50℃, >100℃)
6. Water
Collection (Zeolite), Absorption & flocculation (ferrocyanide)
7. Forest and wood
Solidified ablation (cement), Washing, Thinning
Soil demonstration plant for Cesium cleanup,
in Hirono-cho, Fukushima
Shimizu Corp. 120810 (Zaikei News Paper)
Radioactive waste from environmental cleanup
I. Temporal storage II. Intermediate storage
Ministry of Environment
① Site proposed:
12 candidates in Fukushima Prefecture
② Volume: 28 M m3
③ Schedule: start in 2015 III. Final disposal
Ministry of Environment
① Site proposed:
1 candidate in Kagoshima Prefecture
② Schedule: within 2042
Decontamination
Decontamination
Intermediate
Storage
Final Disposal
Temporal storage
Radioactive waste from environmental cleanup Final disposal (on 3 Sep. 2012)
Disignated waste > 8,000 Bq/kg
9 Local prefecture
Fukushima ; 31,993 tons
Tochigi ; 4,445 >>> *
Ibaraki ; 1,709
Chiba ; 1,018
Tokyo ; 982
Niigata ; 798
Gunma ; 724
Miyagi ; 591
Iwate : 315
-------------------------------
Total 42,575 tons
* Final disposal site propose
By Ministry of Environment
on 3 Sept. 2012
Tochigi Pref. Yaita-city, Shiota
By TBS news
(Decontamination)
+ Decontamination (Cleanup) program
+ Decontamination technology development (Radioactive waste disposal site)
+ Intermediate storage
+ Final disposal site
+ Stakeholder involvement (Rad-Waste dose guideline)
+ Balance with Normal Rad-Waste
+ Balance with NORM waste
+ Cost, volume, NIMBY, etc.
The Issues of Rad-Waste
Radiological guideline
• Decontamination (Cleanup)
+ 1mSv/y > 0.23μSv/h
+ 20mSv/y, 50mSv/y
• Radioactive waste
+ 1mSv/y > 8,000 Bq/kg Cs-137
+ 100,000 Bq/kg Cs-137
,
Rehabilitation stage after accident
Three years past
On-site Issue #1(hardware)
• Stability of damaged reactor core cooling
• Melted core fuel handling
(Technology development,
Remote handling, including robot tech.)
• Stabilization of radioactivity
Gaseous waste, solid waste, liquid waste
• Radioactive wastes
Melted core, intermediate storage,
processing, final disposal
On-site Issue #2(software)
• Radiation workers (100mSv, 50, 20mSv/y)
• Safeguard and Security
• Regulatory arrangement
(Tunami, Earth-q,,,)
• Progress schedule (2, 5, 10, 20years)
• Funds (around 50-100Billion USD)
• Government and political positioning
Dose limit 20mSv/y(50mSv/y), >100mSv(Emergency)30 wks
Abut 3,000 workers/day
Surrounding Area
(1) Emission of radioactivity to the environment
> Contaminated water flow to the sea
> Technical, fund, discharge, fisherman, rumor
(2) Environmental contamination
> Cleanup program > int. >final repository
(3) Food contamination
> Crop, rice, meet, vegetables, fish
(4) Rehabilitation of inhabitant living conditions
> Revision of the lockout area
> Cleanup program, program for return
Impermeable Wall by Frozen Ground Soil
Reactor building Turbine building Mountain
Frozen ground soil
Contaminated
water Go outside 400m3/day
Under G-water
Chernobyl & Fukushima
Expansion of the evacuation area
Returning program
started
Risk perception and political
direction
(1) Risk communication
(2) Anti-nuclear movement
(3) Election
(4) Energy policy, (Wind, solar, e-savings, life style,,,)
(5) Mass media and public opinion
(Hate of nuclear, anti-nuclear,,,,)
(6) Technology and human resource
Mr. Taro YAMAMOTO
Former Prime ministers
M.Hosokawa and J.Koizumi
Aug. 30, 2009 Dec 16, 2012
LDP
Democratic
LDP
Democratic
Lower House Election
Japanese nuclear power plants
NPP re-operation
*Re-Start of stopped nuclear power plants
52 nuclear reactor stop
*Application for re-start (PWR type reactors)
Shikoku E.Co. Ikata-3
Kyushyu E.Co. Sendai-1,2, Genkai-3,4
Hikkaido E.Co. Tomari-1,2,3
Kansai E.Co. Ohi-3,4, Takahama-3,4
Sendai 1. 2 nuclear reactors (Kyushu Electric Co.)
JAEA Revision # Trigger:
MONJU(LMFBR) reactor
(Geological active fault, fund, management)
J-PARK accelerator trouble (release of rad-gas)
Funding (1 B-USD)
# Direction
Concentrate to
MONJYU reactor & Nuclear safety
Transition:
Fusion research, Accelerator etc.
Fukushima MONJU (LMFBR reactor)
Fusion reactor
ITER
J-PARK
Geological disposal
Nuclear regulatory authority Old organization
Human resources: nuclear engineers from undergraduate and graduate school of universities
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Number of Nuclear
Engineers in Industry
Nu
mb
er
of
Un
de
rgra
du
ate
/Gra
du
ate
Sc
ho
ols
Nu
mb
ers
of
En
gin
ee
rs(T
ho
us
an
d)
Number of
Undergraduate &
Graduate Schools
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Technology
Inhabitants health
✔ Accident triggered death
(suicide, acceleration of disease, immune deficiency etc.)
Fukushima 1,664, Miyagi 879, Iwate 434, Ibaraki 41
Ref. Direct death by earthquake and tsunami 1,607
Refugees, about 130,000 (2014.05.10)
✔ PTSD of 60 % for refugees (by Wseda Univ.)
✔ Collapse of the community
✔ Damage of living hood: Agriculture, Fishery etc.
✔Early stage impact by I-131 to child thyroid
✔Q&A Web site for general peoples operated by
young scientist in JHPS
✔Special symposium on Fukushima-1 NPP
accident for the deep analysis
✔Documents on “Responses of and
recommendations from JHPS” Vol. 1 (2012)
✔ Documents on “Responses of and
recommendations from JHPS” Vol. 2 (2014)
✔Discussions in JHPS annual meetings
Japan health Physics Society, JHPS
Thank you very much for your
attention.