Objectives of RFN Study

RFN study has three basic but integrated and wide objectives.

1. To interpret the Economic Development Plans into spatial physical form.

2. To form the framework for National Physical Planning and Development.

3. To provide the basis upon which the national infrastructure, public and social amenities are to be planned and implemented.

RFN Principles

1. To optimise utilization of land and other natural resources

2. To promote environmental awareness and quality.

3. To encourage equitable regional development.

4. To make Malaysia globally competitive.

5. To enhance quality of life.

ADMINISTRATION

BASE MAP

P H

Y S

I C A

L

P L A

N N

I N G

Others

Mining

Local Plan

Land Cover

Forest

CommittedDevelopment

Built up

Agriculture

Structure Plan

Water body

E C

O N

O M

I C S

Fishery

Forestry

GDP

Income

Industrial Estate

Labour

Livestock

Logging

Mining

Tourism

Agricultural Activities

EN

V IR

ON

ME

NT

AL

Agro-Ecological

Erosion Risk

Flood

Heritage

Hydrogeology

Marine

Water Intake

Well

Wetlands

Wildlife

P O

PU

LAT

ION

Existing

Projection

SO

CIA

L

AM

INIT

IES

Hospital

Stadium

Town

University

Hotel

TR

AN

SP

OR

TA

TIO

N

Airports

Railways

Roads

Seaports

N A

T U

R A

L

F E

A T

U R

E S

Catchments

Contour

Geology

Lake

Reservoir

River

River Basin

Slope

Soil

UT

ILIT

IES

&

INF

RA

S

Electricity

Gas Utility

Model Data RFN

Region

State

District

Mukim

H O

U S

I N G

Committed

Existing

Land Development

Low Cost Achievement

Surplus-Shortfall

RFN GIS DATABASE

ANALYSIS STEPS :

1. Initial sectoral analysis Distribution, existing use and characteristics

2. Cross-sectoral analysis To generate Development Planning constraints and potentials scenario

3. Alternative Development Strategies Using Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) to generate alternative desirable scenarios for Land Uses.

List of Analysis Methodology Output / Product

Coastal Environment

Identify and select area and ranked based on;1. Rank 1

Marine Parks, Turtle Landing Sites Critical Erosion Area (Outside PFE) Mangrove Area

2. Rank 2 Mangrove Area (State Land) Significant Erosion Area

3. Rank 3 Others

Map showing sensitive areas andmarine protected areas

Forestry

Delineate wetland and sanctuaries and ranked based on;1. Rank 1

Wildlife sanctuaries & Protected Area (exclude marine Park) Wetlands State Parks

2. Rank 2 Other part of PFE outside Rank 1

3. Rank 3 Forested state land outside Rank 1

Map showing forested areasaccording to importance/rank

WHAT S THE EXPECTED OUTPUT ?

1. Getting sectoral expectation of the output2. To detail the classification, ranking, etc

*** to have a road map to the meet the output ***

Example

NPPLevel 1

NPP/RSNLevel 1a

NPP/RSNLevel 2

RSNLevel 2a

RTDLevel 3

              

1. Built-up

1.1 Residential

1.11 Planned Housing

1.111 Terrace 1.1111 Low Cost1.1112 Medium Cost1.1113 Standard1.1114 Others

1.112 Semi-Detached 1.1111 Low Cost1.1112 Medium Cost1.1113 Standard1.1114 Others

1.113 Detached 1.1111 Low Cost1.1112 Medium Cost1.1113 Standard1.1114 Others

1.114 Flats 1.1111 Low Cost1.1112 Medium Cost1.1113 Standard1.1114 Others

1.12 Traditional Housing

1.121 Kampung1.122 New Villages1.123 Land Development1.124 Orang Asli

 

1.13 Squatter    1.2 Industrial

1.21 Heavy 1.211 Steel1.212 Cement1.213 Tiles

 

1.22 Medium1.23 Light1.24 Service

   

1.3 Commercial

1.31 Town Centre 1.311 Commercial/Office Lot

 

1.3111 Shopping Complex1.3112 Office Block

1.312 Shophouses/Shop Office/Shop Apartment

1.3121 Prewar Shophouse1.3122 Post War Shophouse1.3123 Shop Apartment1.3124 Shop Office

NPP DATA LEVEL

INTER-SECTORAL BASIC ANALYSIS - Example

Data Requirement

Model Flowcharting

LAND AVAILABILITY ANALYSIS

Land Availability Sieved ESA 1,2 and 3

Model Flowcharting of Land Availability Analysis

Merge

Union and Sieve

Land Available for Development

LAND SUITABALITY FOR ECONOMY SCENARIO

Factors and Criterion Used in Land Suitability Analysis

Spatial

Non-Spatial

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHICAL PROCESS WITH EXPERT CHOICE ™

DECISION MAKER

EVALUATION AND PAIRWISING

IMPROVING INCONSISTENCY

Hilly Land (0.250)

Low Land (0.750)

Topography0.230

0 – 12o (0.740)

12 – 20o (0.166)

20 - 25 o (0.094)

Slope0.120

Class 1 (0.033)

Class 2 (0.063)

Class 3 (0.129)

Class 4 (0.261)

Class 5 (0.513)

Soil Class0.070

LAND SUITABILITY MAP

NationalSocio -economic

development planning

component

Project Planning

Component

policy framew

ork

for projecteconom

ic

growth target

Socioeconomic-

target / policies

NationalSocio-economic

-planning

component

National Spatial

Planning Component

Project Planning

Component

new

pro

ject

com

mitm

ents

fram

ewor

k fo

r

proj

ect f

orm

ulat

ion

policy framew

ork

identification

economic

growth target

-

Distribution of populationand economic activities

Integrated Nature of National Development Planning

RFN

RTD

RSN

Govt. AgenciesFederal level

Govt. AgencyState Level

Local Government

Govt. AgencyState Level

Govt. AgenciesFederal level

Local Government

NALIS INFRASTRUCTURE