making $ense of mineral supplementation
DESCRIPTION
Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation. Cody Wright, PhD Extension Beef Specialist South Dakota State University. Introduction. Animals require numerous minerals (macro and trace) for maintenance, growth, and reproduction Mineral nutrition is complex and not well understood. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation
Cody Wright, PhDExtension Beef Specialist
South Dakota State University
Introduction• Animals require numerous minerals
(macro and trace) for maintenance, growth, and reproduction
• Mineral nutrition is complex and not well understood
Assessing Mineral Status• Objectively analyze production
– Rule out other factors• Determine mineral supply
– Forage, supplement, and water– SAMPLE, SAMPLE, SAMPLE!!
• Directly sample the animal– Blood or liver
Sampling Feeds• Trace minerals in clipped and
selected samples are similar• Selected samples generally contain
greater levels of Ca and P than clipped samples
• Sample the forages that cattle are grazing
Sampling Feeds• Sample silages or delivered feeds
periodically to monitor changes• Minerals in feeds and forages are not
100% available– 50% is a reasonable guideline
• Don’t forget the water
Assessing Mineral Status• Compare mineral supply to
requirements• Consider intake
– Feed and mineral
Requirements• Depend on
– Age– Size– Sex– Physiological state– Level of performance– Breed– Presence of antagonists
Antagonists• Sulfur
– > 500 ppm in water can Cu absorption
– Alone or in combination with Mo• Molybdenum
– Cu:Mo ratio of 4.5:1 and dietary S > .25%
• Iron– > 50 ppm
Meeting Requirements• Primary sources of minerals
– Forage (grazed or harvested)– Supplemental feed ingredients– Supplemental minerals
• Fed• Bolus• Injected
Western WheatgrassMineral Live Dead
------------------ % of DM ------------------
Ca .25* .22P .16* .07Mg .12 .07K 1.6* .3Adapted from Grings et al. (1996)*Mineral concentrations in live and dead tissue differ P < .01
Western WheatgrassMineral Live Dead
--------------------- ppm ---------------------
Zn 20* 15Cu 2 2Mn 47 49Mo 1 1Adapted from Grings et al. (1996)*Mineral concentrations in live and dead tissue differ P < .01
Sandhills Meadow HayMineral Cherry Rock HoltCu (ppm) 9.4 6.7 6.5Zn (ppm) 26.1 25.5 27.5Mn (ppm) 85.9 111.9 131.5P (%) .25 .29 .15Mg (%) .17 .19 .16K (%) 1.1 1.6 1.3Adapted from Hickock et al. (1996)≥ 75% of requirement for gestating cow
Formulating Supplements• Considerations
– Animal requirements– Minerals in feeds and forages– Potential antagonists– Sources and levels– Expected responses
Formulating Supplements• Phosphorus is generally the most
expensive mineral to supplement
So, why do we feed so much?
Phosphorus• Late 1930’s
– King Ranch % calf crop by 40% and 41% weaning wt by 69 lb and 49 lb lb weaned per cow exposed by 156 lb
and 165 lb– Return per $1 invested = $3.95 and
$12.35
Adapted from Herd (1997)
Phosphorus• Karn (1995 and 1997)
– Less dramatic responses– Heifers - conception rates and weight
gain– Cows - weight gain and weaning
weights– Small and inconsistent
Formulating Supplements• General guideline
– Each 1% P costs adds ~$11 per ton• Reducing from 12% to 8% P
mineral cost by ~$44 per ton– Savings of $1.50 per cow– $750 per year for a 500 hd operation
Supplemental P
Body weight, lb
Total diet P, %.05 .15 .25
------ % P needed in supplement ------1000 8 6 61100 10 6 61200 10 6 61300 12 6 61400 12 6 6Adapted from Paisley and Hill (2000)
Supplemental P
Stage of production
Total diet P, %.05 .15 .25
------ % P needed in supplement ------Late
gestation 16 6 6Lactation10 lb/d 16 6 620 lb/d 16 10 630 lb/d 16 12 6Adapted from Paisley and Hill (2000)
Phosphorus in Feeds
Feed % P in feed
lb fed per day2 4 6
------- % P added to diet -------CGF .95 .07 .14 .21DDG .83 .06 .12 .19SFM 1.02 .08 .15 .23WM 1.00 .08 .15 .23
Gestating cows require .17 to .22Lactating cows require .22 to .39
Formulating Supplements
Mineral % of NRC requirement*75 100 125
Cobalt 9.6 12.8 16Copper 960 1280 1600Iodine 48 64 80Manganese 384 5120 6400Selenium 9.6 12.8 16Zinc 2880 3840 4800*Assumes 1200 lb cow consuming DM at 2% of body weight and mineral intake of 3 oz per day
Maximum Levels• Selenium
– 3 mg/hd/d or .3 ppm in diet• Iodine
– 10 mg/hd/d– Well below level claimed to prevent
footrot
Mineral Sources• Critical to formulating cost-effective
programs• Cost per unit of mineral
– Consider mineral concentration and bioavailability
BioavailabilityMost bioavailable
OrganicSulfate and chlorideCarbonatesOxides
Least bioavailableIN GENERAL, BUT NOT ALWAYS!!
Organic Minerals?• Two supplements
– 100% of NRC @ 3 oz per day– 100% inorganic = $580/ton– 50/50 blend = $680/ton– 17.2% in cost ($3.42 per cow)
Responses• Key to evaluating changes• Potential benefits
– Health– Weaning weight– Growth performance– Reproductive efficiency
Responses
Sub-Clinical Clinical
Immune Function
Growth or Fertility
Clinical Signs
Time
Min
eral
Sta
tus
Responses• Cost / benefit analysis• Must be able to pay for any increase
in cost• Can we reduce cost without
sacrificing production?
Strategic Supplementation• Supplement only when needed• Begin ~45 days before calving• Continue through breeding season
Strategic Supplementation• Year round
– $400 per ton @ 2 oz per day– $9.13 per cow
• Strategic (Feb 1 to July 1)– $400 per ton @ 3 oz per day– $5.63 per cow (38% less)– $1750 savings on 500 hd operation
Summary• Objectively evaluate current herd
mineral status• Rule out other factors• Sample forages, supplements, and
water to determine mineral intake and level of antagonists
Summary• Formulate or purchase mineral
supplements to correct imbalances• Develop strategic mineral program to
reduce expenses• Estimate and objectively evaluate
production responses