making $ense of mineral supplementation

32
Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation Cody Wright, PhD Extension Beef Specialist South Dakota State University

Upload: abena

Post on 25-Feb-2016

49 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation. Cody Wright, PhD Extension Beef Specialist South Dakota State University. Introduction. Animals require numerous minerals (macro and trace) for maintenance, growth, and reproduction Mineral nutrition is complex and not well understood. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Cody Wright, PhDExtension Beef Specialist

South Dakota State University

Page 2: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Introduction• Animals require numerous minerals

(macro and trace) for maintenance, growth, and reproduction

• Mineral nutrition is complex and not well understood

Page 3: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Assessing Mineral Status• Objectively analyze production

– Rule out other factors• Determine mineral supply

– Forage, supplement, and water– SAMPLE, SAMPLE, SAMPLE!!

• Directly sample the animal– Blood or liver

Page 4: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Sampling Feeds• Trace minerals in clipped and

selected samples are similar• Selected samples generally contain

greater levels of Ca and P than clipped samples

• Sample the forages that cattle are grazing

Page 5: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Sampling Feeds• Sample silages or delivered feeds

periodically to monitor changes• Minerals in feeds and forages are not

100% available– 50% is a reasonable guideline

• Don’t forget the water

Page 6: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Assessing Mineral Status• Compare mineral supply to

requirements• Consider intake

– Feed and mineral

Page 7: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Requirements• Depend on

– Age– Size– Sex– Physiological state– Level of performance– Breed– Presence of antagonists

Page 8: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Antagonists• Sulfur

– > 500 ppm in water can Cu absorption

– Alone or in combination with Mo• Molybdenum

– Cu:Mo ratio of 4.5:1 and dietary S > .25%

• Iron– > 50 ppm

Page 9: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Meeting Requirements• Primary sources of minerals

– Forage (grazed or harvested)– Supplemental feed ingredients– Supplemental minerals

• Fed• Bolus• Injected

Page 10: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Western WheatgrassMineral Live Dead

------------------ % of DM ------------------

Ca .25* .22P .16* .07Mg .12 .07K 1.6* .3Adapted from Grings et al. (1996)*Mineral concentrations in live and dead tissue differ P < .01

Page 11: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Western WheatgrassMineral Live Dead

--------------------- ppm ---------------------

Zn 20* 15Cu 2 2Mn 47 49Mo 1 1Adapted from Grings et al. (1996)*Mineral concentrations in live and dead tissue differ P < .01

Page 12: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Sandhills Meadow HayMineral Cherry Rock HoltCu (ppm) 9.4 6.7 6.5Zn (ppm) 26.1 25.5 27.5Mn (ppm) 85.9 111.9 131.5P (%) .25 .29 .15Mg (%) .17 .19 .16K (%) 1.1 1.6 1.3Adapted from Hickock et al. (1996)≥ 75% of requirement for gestating cow

Page 13: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Formulating Supplements• Considerations

– Animal requirements– Minerals in feeds and forages– Potential antagonists– Sources and levels– Expected responses

Page 14: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Formulating Supplements• Phosphorus is generally the most

expensive mineral to supplement

So, why do we feed so much?

Page 15: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Phosphorus• Late 1930’s

– King Ranch % calf crop by 40% and 41% weaning wt by 69 lb and 49 lb lb weaned per cow exposed by 156 lb

and 165 lb– Return per $1 invested = $3.95 and

$12.35

Adapted from Herd (1997)

Page 16: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Phosphorus• Karn (1995 and 1997)

– Less dramatic responses– Heifers - conception rates and weight

gain– Cows - weight gain and weaning

weights– Small and inconsistent

Page 17: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Formulating Supplements• General guideline

– Each 1% P costs adds ~$11 per ton• Reducing from 12% to 8% P

mineral cost by ~$44 per ton– Savings of $1.50 per cow– $750 per year for a 500 hd operation

Page 18: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Supplemental P

Body weight, lb

Total diet P, %.05 .15 .25

------ % P needed in supplement ------1000 8 6 61100 10 6 61200 10 6 61300 12 6 61400 12 6 6Adapted from Paisley and Hill (2000)

Page 19: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Supplemental P

Stage of production

Total diet P, %.05 .15 .25

------ % P needed in supplement ------Late

gestation 16 6 6Lactation10 lb/d 16 6 620 lb/d 16 10 630 lb/d 16 12 6Adapted from Paisley and Hill (2000)

Page 20: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Phosphorus in Feeds

Feed % P in feed

lb fed per day2 4 6

------- % P added to diet -------CGF .95 .07 .14 .21DDG .83 .06 .12 .19SFM 1.02 .08 .15 .23WM 1.00 .08 .15 .23

Gestating cows require .17 to .22Lactating cows require .22 to .39

Page 21: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Formulating Supplements

Mineral % of NRC requirement*75 100 125

Cobalt 9.6 12.8 16Copper 960 1280 1600Iodine 48 64 80Manganese 384 5120 6400Selenium 9.6 12.8 16Zinc 2880 3840 4800*Assumes 1200 lb cow consuming DM at 2% of body weight and mineral intake of 3 oz per day

Page 22: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Maximum Levels• Selenium

– 3 mg/hd/d or .3 ppm in diet• Iodine

– 10 mg/hd/d– Well below level claimed to prevent

footrot

Page 23: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Mineral Sources• Critical to formulating cost-effective

programs• Cost per unit of mineral

– Consider mineral concentration and bioavailability

Page 24: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

BioavailabilityMost bioavailable

OrganicSulfate and chlorideCarbonatesOxides

Least bioavailableIN GENERAL, BUT NOT ALWAYS!!

Page 25: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Organic Minerals?• Two supplements

– 100% of NRC @ 3 oz per day– 100% inorganic = $580/ton– 50/50 blend = $680/ton– 17.2% in cost ($3.42 per cow)

Page 26: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Responses• Key to evaluating changes• Potential benefits

– Health– Weaning weight– Growth performance– Reproductive efficiency

Page 27: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Responses

Sub-Clinical Clinical

Immune Function

Growth or Fertility

Clinical Signs

Time

Min

eral

Sta

tus

Page 28: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Responses• Cost / benefit analysis• Must be able to pay for any increase

in cost• Can we reduce cost without

sacrificing production?

Page 29: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Strategic Supplementation• Supplement only when needed• Begin ~45 days before calving• Continue through breeding season

Page 30: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Strategic Supplementation• Year round

– $400 per ton @ 2 oz per day– $9.13 per cow

• Strategic (Feb 1 to July 1)– $400 per ton @ 3 oz per day– $5.63 per cow (38% less)– $1750 savings on 500 hd operation

Page 31: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Summary• Objectively evaluate current herd

mineral status• Rule out other factors• Sample forages, supplements, and

water to determine mineral intake and level of antagonists

Page 32: Making $ense of Mineral Supplementation

Summary• Formulate or purchase mineral

supplements to correct imbalances• Develop strategic mineral program to

reduce expenses• Estimate and objectively evaluate

production responses