ibm storage sales © 2007 ibm corporation ibm system storage archive and data retention systems

39
IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

Upload: joanna-underwood

Post on 23-Dec-2015

228 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

IBM System Storage Archive and DataRetention Systems

Page 2: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Information business challenges

Information Life Cycle Management

DR550 product

Retention policies

Architecture and solutions

Differentiators

Whats new

Resources

Competition

Review questions

Agenda

Page 3: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Do you have this kind of information?

Instant messages,

e-mail

Orders, Confirmations

Customer/ Supplier Records

CustomerCorrespondence

, Reports

Photos, Videos, Audio (Phone

Conversations)

Web Content

Invoices, Financial and Tax Statements

Call Center

Wireless & PDA

Kiosk

Portal /Browser

BusinessContent

@@BusinessContent

CreateSearchStore

ManageDistribute

Retain

SAP

SAP

ExchangeNotes

SAP

Page 4: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Sources: IBM & Industry Studies, Customer Interviews

Do You Have Any of These Business Challenges?

Up to 40% of IT budgets spent on

integration

Up to 40% of IT budgets spent on

integration

30% of people’s time is spent searching for relevant information.

30% of people’s time is spent searching for relevant information.

The average billion dollar company: 48 disparate financial systems

2.7 ERP systems

The average billion dollar company: 48 disparate financial systems

2.7 ERP systems

Health care represents major challenges in data growth and

compliance

Health care represents major challenges in data growth and

compliance

42% of transactions are still paper-based.42% of transactions

are still paper-based.

Inadvertent deletion / modification of information is a leading cause of non-compliance

Inadvertent deletion / modification of information is a leading cause of non-compliance

Good business practices dictating

long-term retention of data

Good business practices dictating

long-term retention of data

85% of information is unstructured.

85% of information is unstructured.

Trx.

DocumentsReports

e-Mails

Media

CustomersEmployees

Partners

Databases

Orgs.FinancialsProducts

WebContent

79% of companies: have 2 +

repositories… 25%: have 15 +

79% of companies: have 2 +

repositories… 25%: have 15 +

Sarbanes-Oxley and SEC regulations

dictating information retention

Sarbanes-Oxley and SEC regulations

dictating information retention

Rapidly growing storage requirements causing costs to spiral out of

control

Rapidly growing storage requirements causing costs to spiral out of

control

More and more information is being kept “Just In Case”

More and more information is being kept “Just In Case”

“Missing Email May Cost Morgan Stanley 10M$”

“Missing Email May Cost Morgan Stanley 10M$”

Page 5: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Archiving a Big Client Pain, Big Growth Opportunity and an Easy Opportunity to Identify

Document Management

Document Imaging

Output / Report Management

Digital AssetManagement

Digital Rights Management Web Content

Management

Archiving RecordsManagement

Archiving

Page 6: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Slow/Low

Fast/High

MortgageLoan Payoff

Life InsurancePolicy Payoff

1 Ho

ur1 D

ay

1 Month

5 Years

20 Yea

rs

50 Yea

rs

100+

Y

ears

StorageMigration

StorageMigration

Time – Record Life Cycle

StorageMigration

Accessib

ility – Sp

eed

/Freq

uen

cy

RegulatoryRequest

Legal DiscoveryRequest

Active

Semi-active

Source: Cohasset Associates, Inc.

Data becomes “Just In Case”

Just-In Case Information

Page 7: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

What is Information Lifecycle Management (ILM)

The process of managing business data throughout its lifecycle from conception until disposal in a manner that optimizes storage and access at the lowest cost

Page 8: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

The IBM System Storage DR550

A purpose built, information archive for long term data retention and protection

►Policy-based, non-erasable, non-rewriteable disk storage►Industry leading IBM advanced technology

Automatic policy-based tiered storage management Data encryption – In flight and at rest IBM dual processor Power5 technology for high performance

(benchmarked at over 3x competition) IBM SATA disk technology for low cost Enablement of secondary storage, i.e. WORM Tape (optional)

supporting very low TCO Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Monitoring – proactive

system problem prevention and correction

►High speed 10/100/1000 Ethernet connectivity

►Disaster recovery options with synchronous and asynchronous replication

►Deemed compliant with SEC 17a-4 by independent consultants

Page 9: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

IBM Information Infrastructure for Information ComplianceIBM System Storage™ DR550 V4.6

Client value– Improves performance in large

environments, due to larger disks– Reduces TCO and power

consumption up to 50% with blended disk and tape option, compared to all-disk configurations

Reasons to buy: – New 1TB drives adds 33% more disk

capacity than previous drives – IPv6 support on single node

configurations expands network address space to 128 bits and eliminates the network address translation (NAT) role

Information Compliance

DR550 Model DR1 DR550 Model DR2

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr

33% more disk capacity

Page 10: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

DR550 Ranges from 5.6 to 89.6 TB of raw disk storage

capacity Single or dual server options Choice of Ethernet connections Synchronous or asynchronous replication options Tape ready

Optional TS1120 or LTO-3 WORM

IBM DR550

IBM DR550 Express

DR550 Express Ranges from 1.1 to 6.7 TB raw disk

storage capacity Choice of Ethernet connections Optional 25U rack with lockable doors Tape ready

Optional TS1120 or LTO-3 WORM

IBM System Storage DR550 Family

Page 11: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Add Tape for Complete Archive Solution

Add tape to provide:

– Backup for the DR550 operational files

– Migration path for DR550 controlled data to lower cost storage

– Lower overall TCO

– DR550 scalability to petabytes

– Unique differentiation versus competition

IBM DR550

IBM DR550 ExpressIBM TS3500

DR550 tiered storage with IBM System Storage TS1120 Enterprise tape system and/or other attached WORM tape media such as LTO Ultrium Generation 3 WORM Tape drives and IBM WORM tape libraries

Attached tape example

Page 12: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

DR550 Retention Policies

Default and custom policies

Expire based on a predetermined expiration date

Expire based on a retention event

Expire on demand

Stored indefinitely

Use a deletion hold and release– Holds data for an indefinite period of time, regardless of the

expiration date or defined event

– Used for audits and legal events

Page 13: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Replication Options

IBM DR550

Application with Retention Policy

E-mail, images, documents and other object and files that

need retaining

Dual writes byapplication

Metro or GlobalMirror

IBM DR550

IBM DR550

Page 14: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

DR550 Solution Architecture Examples

Businessapplication

Document filesE-mail IBM DB2 Content Manager

Three critical components required to build a “Retention Managed Data” solution

1. Business application

2. Content management application

3. Retention device – policy based non-erasable non-rewritable

Retention device

Content management application

Optim 6.2SQL Server

DB2

Enterprise Vault

IBM DB2 CommonStore… and others IBM System Storage DR550

Page 15: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Where can the DR550 help? The DR550 solution can help with the following:

► Solve problems of archiving E-mail archive, Instant messages, voice mails, etc. with policy-based tiered storage

► Archive inactive tables/rows of CRM/ERP databases (e.g. PeopleSoft, Siebel, UDB, Oracle Financials, SAP, etc.)

► Replace aging optical storage (for example IBM 3995 Jukebox)

► Images (any kind of digital media), engineering drawings, contracts, any corporate asset worth protecting, even college transcripts

► Corporate retention policies

► Sarbanes-Oxley retention requirements

► SEC retention requirements

► Other legal or regulatory requirements – can help to protect records from policy-based deletion during legal or other inquiries

Page 16: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

DR550 Information Retention Solutions

Examples of DR550 solutions include many IBM and non-IBM solutions:

Retention: DR550 + IBM Content Manager

Exchange Archiving: DR550 + IBM Content Manager + IBM CommonStore Exchange

Exchange Archiving: DR550 + Symantec Enterprise Vault

Exchange Archiving: DR550 + Zantaz EAS

Domino Archiving: DR550 + IBM Content Manager + IBM CommonStore Domino

Domino Archiving: DR550 + Zantaz EAS

SAP Archiving: DR550 + IBM Content Manager + IBM CommonStore SAP

SAP Archiving: DR550 + EasySoftware Easy Enterprise x

Optical Replacement: DR550 + IBM Content Manager for iSeries + MBS Technologies StorageView Connector for CM/i

Database Archiving (Oracle, DB2, PeopleSoft, Siebel): DR550 + Princeton Softech Optim

Image Archiving: DR550 + FileNet Image Manager

NFS/CIFS/FTP Gateway: DR550 + Triade TriFSG Gateway

Page 17: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Application Support for IBM DR550 AXS-One BrainTribe (Formerly Comprendium) CaminoSoft Ceyoniq D.velop AG Easy Software Heilig & Schubert (H&S) FileNet Hummingbird Hyland Software (OnBase) Hyperwave IRIS Software (Documentum Connector) MBS Technologies

– (iSeries Connector for IBM CM V5) OpenText (formerly IXOS) Princeton Softech Optim 6.2

– for PeopleSoft; Siebel; Oracle Saperion SER Solutions TRIADE (NFS/CIFS/FTP Gateway) Veritas Enterprise Vault (formerly KVS) Waters (Creon Labs, NuGenesis) Windream Zantaz

IBM DB2 CM for Multiplatforms IBM DB2 CM for zOS IBM DB2 CM On Demand for

Multiplatforms IBM DB2 CM On Demand for zOS IBM CommonStore for Exchange

Server IBM CommonStore for Lotus Domino IBM CommonStore for SAP IBM CM for Message Monitoring and

Retention– With iLumin

BRMS iOS (also via IFS to BRMS)

Page 18: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Key DR550 Differentiators Event-based retention management Policy-based automatic expiration/deletion of data Policy-based reuse of storage Tiered storage management to multiple tiers of less expensive

storage – Can significantly reduce TCO using disk & WORM tape combination

Off-site (vault) protection of the data Media Migration – When replacing old media with new Data Encryption – for enhanced security Very High Performance with IBM Power5 technology Very Competitive Price on base models Integration of different technologies with our storage pool hierarchy Access and authentication control Enterprise class availability, reliability, scalability

Page 19: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Competition

Page 20: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Strengths of EMC Centera

Allows Single Instance Storage

– One and the same object is stored only once

– In-band data deduplication

Scalable based on RAIN Architecture

– Storage is added via storage nodes (disk only)

– Performance scales with access nodes (Ethernet connectivity)

– Supports Active-Active Mirroring relation between nodes

Includes Outboard Search capabilities in Centera

– Allows to search for Content

Established and recognized Product in the market

– Many customer references available, many ISV support EMC Centera API

CAS architecture is a marketing advantage

– Content Address can be used to validate content authenticy

– Clever idea, but not required by regulations

*Based on preliminary findings of internal IBM projections.

Page 21: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Weakness of EMC Centera

Does not offer Tiered Storage or alterative storage technologies– Higher TCO, especially for longer term archiving– Less flexibility for migration to other storage technologies

Data protection only through additional disk– Content Mirroring is not synchronous– No backup of data to less expensive storage media

Sticky Technology– Replacement of MD-5 hash requires application to read all data

Known Performance Issues– According to non-disclosed sources and ISVs– Partially caused by RAIN Architecture (CAS and Centera Network)

No data encryption included

*Based on preliminary findings of internal IBM projections.

Page 22: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Key Strengths for IBM DR550

DR550 allows for lower Total Cost of Ownership for long retention times– DR550 supports true tiered storage (disk, optical, tape)– With removable media storage DR550 is more energy-efficient– With Centera data is kept on disk for long archival period, less energy efficient

DR550 includes Data Migration Functions– Centera is disk centric, migration just from disk to disk

DR550 is not a sticky Technology– DR550 leverages industry-leading technology such as TSM– Centeras’ CAS implementation is sticky

DR550 provides flexible options for Data Protection– DR550 provides synchronous mirroring or backup to tape – Centera requires disk and even more disk

DR550 has leading Archival – Retrieval Performance– Get real numbers from EMC Centera and compare it to DR550

DR550 includes Data Encryption Techniques– On disk via API encryption, On tape via Tape encryption

Page 23: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Performance ComparisonNetApp and EMC Centera Testing 8 Enterprise Vault Servers

archiving 8 Exchange Servers 4 x 1-Gbit Ethernet Interfaces NetApp FAS3050 and R200 EMC Centera G4 with 4 Access

Nodes and 12 Storage Nodes using CPM

DR550 Testing 5 Zantaz EAS servers archiving 4

Exchange Server 2 x 1-Gbit Ethernet Interfaces DR550 with 7 TB single node

Performance Comparison E-Mail Archiving

02468

101214

Device Type

Th

rou

gh

pu

t in

MB

/sec

FAS3050

R200

Centera

DR550

Source: Test Report from Veritest, July 2006“Network Appliance™ FAS3050, R200, and EMC Centera G4 Performance Comparison”

ESG Lab Review™, May 2007http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr/pdf/esg_lab_review03072007.pdf

Page 24: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Single Instance Storage

Where is single instance storage really efficient and required?

– When data objects are identical

Suited for E-mail archiving (especially attachments)

– Most e-mail archiving systems however include single instance storage

• IBM CommonStore, Zantaz, Symantec EV

• Therefore, DR550 does not need it.

• Means less overhead with DR550 and more performance

Other Arguments to discuss:

– MD-5 which is not longer unambiguous

• What happens an object is not stored due to a faulty algorithm

– Single Instance Storage cuts back I/O performance

• See Centera Performance

Page 25: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Where to go for more information

DR550– Spec sheets– Redbook– White Papers– Manuals

All DR550 components

– Spec sheets– Redbooks

IBM DR550 Sales Kit:–IBM Sales Teams: http://w3-1.ibm.com/sales/systems/portal/_s.155/254?

navID=f220s240&geoID=AM&prodID=Disk&docID=dataretentcomplsk.skit&docType=SalesKit&skCat=DocumentType

–Business Partner Sales Teams: http://w3-1.ibm.com/sales/systems/portal/_s.155/254?navID=f220s240&geoID=All&prodID=IBM%20eServer%20And%20TotalStorage%20Products&docID=dataretentcomplsk.skit&docType=SalesKit&skCat=DocumentType_moreinfo

IBM System Storage Data Retention External web site– http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/storage/disk/dr/index.html

IBM External Information Lifecycle Management (ILM) web site

– http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/storage/solutions/ilm/

IBM WORM Tape offering – External Web Site– http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/storage/tape/3592/index.html

IBM System Storage Archive Manager– http://www-306.ibm.com/software/tivoli/products/storage-mgr-data-reten/

IBM System Storage Archive Manager – Supported Devices– http://www-3.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/

IBM_TSM_Supported_Devices_for_AIXHPSUNWIN.html/

IBM System Storage Archive Manager developer site– http://www.developer.ibm.com/tivoli/about_tsmdr.html

Searchstorage.com Articles:– June, 2004 - EMC dodges question on Centera Performance– February, 2005 - EMC Centera Scalability Hampers Large e-mail Archives– December, 2005 - Hospital ditches EMC Centera for long-term archiving

Byte and Switch Article:– January, 2006 - The CAS Conundrum

Page 26: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Review questions• The DR550 has what major competitive features?

• Performance, retention policies, and tape attachment• Energy conservation, SAS drives, and 8 gb/s FC connection• Performance, massive capacity, and iSCSI attachmnt• Optical migration, SAS attachment, and perfromance

• The major competitor of the DR550 is?• EMC Centura• HP Virtual Archive• SunFire 25000• VMWare

• The DR550 is a key part of a tiered data retention solution. What are the other parts?• Power Systems and TS3500• Key enterprise application and a policy making application• Information Life Cycle Management and Business Continuity• DB2 CommonStore and Microsoft Virtual Server

• The major applications for the DR550 are • High speed transaction applications and business intelligence• CRM,SCM, and ERP• Spinning archive and compliance • Insurance and distribution

Page 27: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Additional Information

Page 28: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

• Advisory services

• Legacy transformation services

• Custom application services

• Business risk and compliance

• Strategy and change

• Vertical expertise

• Data Classification

• IT infrastructure services

• Performance & availability

• Tiered storage deployment

Add IGS services to the solution… Implementation Services for the IBM System Storage DR550 Implementation Services for Mirroring via System Storage DS4000

Family Enhanced Remote Mirror Services RAID Conversion Services for the IBM System Storage DR550 MES Services via an Equipment Modification Contract for Hardware Offerings that include implementation services, onsite

software/firmware upgrades, and three-year maintenance upgrades

Page 29: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

References Large UK Bank – IBM Content Manager on Demand

Depository Trust – IBM Content Manager

Porsche (Automotive) – Ceyoniq

IBM Customer Support Organization – IBM Content Manager

Hudson Valley Credit Union – Hyland

Boehringer (Pharmaceutical) – Documentum

Large US-based Financial Services Company – IBM Content Mgr

Large Semi-conductor company – IBM CommonStore for SAP

Leading Logistics provider – d.velop document mgmt software

Page 30: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

EMC Centera Overview

Source: “A Centera Whitepaper: Understanding and Addressing the Challenges of Compliance and Discovery” by EMC Corp.

Centera does notallow deletions ormodifications

(Object based)

Cen

tera

AP

I

Page 31: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Data Migration

Who knows which storage technology is “most appropriate” in the future?

– Holographic Storage and solid state disk is just “around the corner”

– Storing data on disk for long periods might become really expensive

Long term archiving requires to migrate data to other storage devices and –technologies in the future

– As well as migration of client, DMS and other infrastructure

With EMC Centera customers are bound on disk

– Migration to other technologies becomes more complicated and might not be transparent to the application

DR550 has Data migration capabilities built-in

– New storage technologies are supported by SSAM

– Data Migration is transparent to application

Page 32: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Links: DR550 vs. Centera DR550 Home Page

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr/index.html

DR550 Performance Measurement Report:

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr/performance.html

DR550 Performance Whitepaper from ESG Lab Review™

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr/pdf/esg_lab_review03072007.pdf

Veritest Report about NetApp and Centera Performance

http://www.netapp.com/news/press/news_rel_20060912a

http://www.lionbridge.com/competitive_analysis/reports/netapp/NetApp_FAS3050-R200_EMC_Centera_Report.pdf

TCO Study from RFG comparing cost of disk and tape:

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/disk/dr/pdf/RFG_Paper.pdf

TCO study from DMG “Is tape really cheaper than disk?”

http://www.lto.org/News/paper-form.php

CAS Condrum Article at ByteAndSwitch

http://www.byteandswitch.com/document.asp?doc_id=87375

EMC Centera Home Page

http://www.emc.com/products/family/emc-centera-family.htm

Holographic Storage

http://www.inphase-technologies.com/products/default.asp?tnn=3

Page 33: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

DR550 Competitive Attack PointsIBM DR550 EMC Centera Customer Business Value

Tiered storage with attached WORM or non-WORM tape helps provide lower total cost of ownership

Centera data is disk only, which is more expensive due to initial purchase cost, and power, cooling and service costs over long archiving periods

Lower TCO with DR550 over long archiving periods by off-loading “aged” data to lower storage tiers (e.g. tape or optical) and Implements ILM practices

Integrated data migration capabilities for long term archiving: DR550 supports many storage technologies (disk, tape, optical) and data migration functions. As data “outlives the media”, DR550 provides transparent migration capabilities to new storage technologies.

EMC Centera is disk centric, with no media migration path to other storage technologies.

Improved operational efficiency for long term archiving and commitment to open architecture

Addressing the risk of technology obsolescence

High performance archive and retrieve enabling data rates of up to 60 MB/sec and more than 2000 objects/second. Scalable performance through multi-object transaction enabled by TSM API.

EMC will not publish performance data. Vendors report significant performance deficiency of EMC Centera compared to DR550.

DR550 offers improved return on overall IT investment through improved overall system throughput, scalability and quick access to archived data

Disaster protection options:DR550 supports synchronous and asynchronous replication as well as asynchronous replication (backup) and offline vaulting to many external devices.

Asynchronous replication only, does not provide integrated capability for backup and offline vaulting.

Synchronous mirroring offers higher data protection with better recovery point objective and lowers risk of data loss as result of a disaster.

Backup to tape offers lower TCO than backup to disk over long archiving periods.

DR550 maintains data integrity via hardware RAID and embedded Cyclic Redundancy Checks (CRC)

EMC Centera Content Addressable Storage (CAS) technology is not future proof. The content address will become vulnerable, and then the application will need to read and rewrite all objects in order to provide a new, more secure content address.

IBM DR550 built-in data integrity capabilities help to assure compliance and enable transparent upgrades of data integrity check methods.

The DR550 has flexible data encryption with the option for transparent key management done by the DR550 or by the application.

Another option for data encryption is on the tape storage media with key management by DR550 or another key manager.

Data encryption is not included. Flexible encryption options protect data using tiered storage, and additionally prevent sensitive data disclosure on removable media that could be misplaced.

Built-in and cost-free file archiving solution via SSAM Archive Client

No built-in file archiving solution. Offers cost efficient file archiving solution.

DR550 scales in three dimensions: storage, performance and price (economies of scale)

Only scales in one dimension: storage. It does not scale performance or price.

Supports growth, provides investment protection, enables an open architecture for archiving, and lowers TCO.

Page 34: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Performance

Prior Centera Performance:– In 2002 Centera achieved a rate of 18,450 per hour for archiving

• about 5 objects per second

Newest EMC Centera Performance results: – 16-node Centera system archived upwards of 240,000 e-mails per hour

• About 67 e-mails per second– Average size of e-mail is assumed at 10 – 100 KB– Veritas Enterprise Vault was used as DMS

DR550 does 111 Object per second with 10 Objects (64K) per transactions– Multi-object transaction with 500 Objects per transaction achieves about

170 Objects (128 K) and 833 Objects (8K) per second

Page 35: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Performance Comparison

EMC Centera1 IBM DR550 V 1.5

Obj.-Size 1 – 128 KB 32 – 128 MB

W 1 – 2 MB/s

6 – 22 MB/s*

20 – 36 MB/s

R 1 – 2 MB/s

6 – 21 MB/s*

30 – 44 MB/s

Obj-Size 1-128 kB 32-128MBW/R 1 MB/s 3,9 MB/sR 3 MB/s 7-8 MB/s

* Multi-object Transaction

Detailed DR550 Performance Report: http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/storage/disk/dr/performance.html

1 EMC internal numbers (undisclosed sources)

IBM Confidential

Page 36: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

Performance of Competition

Single node FAS3050 was 38% faster than 16-node Centera (4:12)

R200 was 45% faster

Single disk drive failure:

– FAS3050 was 80% faster

– R200 was 74% faster

4 x 1 Gbit Ethernet Channel has been used for all systems

300 MB/Minute =

5 MB/sec !!!(with 4 channels)

Source: Test Report from Veritest, July 2006“Network Appliance™ FAS3050, R200, and EMC Centera G4 Performance Comparison”

Page 37: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

New Technology – holographic storage

Next Generation optical storage

– Faster: read and write matrices of bits

• Traditional optical reads and writes serial.

– More Capacity: more than 200 GB initially

• Blue-Ray / UDO targets 100 GB (+)

Press Release (Heise, 19.4.2005Press Release (Heise, 19.4.2005

Inphase Technology plans to release a Inphase Technology plans to release a 300-Gigabyte-300-Gigabyte-Laufwerk Laufwerk with a transfer rate of with a transfer rate of 160 MByte/s 160 MByte/s to the market to the market in the next year. In a next generation in the next year. In a next generation 1,6 TByte Kapazität 1,6 TByte Kapazität and and 960 MByte/s 960 MByte/s shall be archieved….shall be archieved….

How will EMC Centera handle this in the future?

Page 38: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

EMC Centera on zOS Here are some limitation I see with this solution

– Not a one-hand solution: 3490 or 3995 emulator from third (either bustech - 3490 or interkom - 3995).

– No retention management with this solution, because the leading application on zOS such as CM or CMoD does not send the retention time for an object.

– Leading application is device dependent, thus future migrations to other device have to be performed through the leading application.

– No hierarchical storage management. Thus the data will always be on disk. This causes much higher TCO.

– zOS is IBM-World, thus the integration between hardware and software is much better with an IBM DR550.

– 3490 and 3995 architecture is fairly old.

Escon / Ficon LAN

zSeries

CM OAM

3490 or 3995

Emulator

Centera

Page 39: IBM Storage Sales © 2007 IBM Corporation IBM System Storage Archive and Data Retention Systems

IBM Storage Sales

© 2007 IBM Corporation

EMC Centera and TSM TSM and SSAM support EMC Centera as storage device There are many limitation making it impossible to migrated

data from or to Centera:

– No Migration.

– No Reclamation.

– No Move data into or out of a Centera storage pool.

– No Moving node data into or out of a Centera storage pool.

– No Storage pool backup of Centera storage pools.

– No Restore volume of Centera storage pool volumes.

– No Exporting data to a Centera device class or importing data from a Centera device class

– No Using a Centera device class for creating backup sets; however, files stored in Centera storage pools can be sent to backup sets.

– No Defining Centera volumes.

– No Using a Centera device class to back up a database.

– No Using a Centera device class for database loading or unloading.

– No Using a Centera device class as the target of volume history, device configuration, trace logs, error logs, or query output files.