i i i - u.s. army corps of engineers bay model€¦ · 2 towing tug 1 tending tug 1 survey/crewboat...

• I

COST SUMMARYSMALL PROJECT DREDGING WITH DISPOSAL AT TIDAL WETLANDS - SCENARIO 2

(21 CY Clamshell Dredge, with Lightly Loaded Scows, 20 N. Miles)

Dredge I Transport 1 Placement

Mobilizationand Demobilization $ 84.000 I 37,280 I 46,720 IOceratingCosts

1 Clamshell Dredgeo Hyd.Unloader2 TowingTug1 Tending Tug1 Survey/Crewboat4 DumpScows1 ShoreCrew

1 Superv/Engrg

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00

Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $

Months @ $

Months @ $Months @ $

Months @ $Months @ $

268,211358,646224,23280,84043,0396,250140,55584,540

268,2110448,464 80,84043,03925,000050,619

268,211

448,464

80,840 43,039 25,000

22,930

27,689

Total Operating Costs $ 916,173 I 415,020 I 501,153 I

~ership CostsI 1 ClamshellDredge

o Hyd.Unloader

o BoosterPump2 TowingTug1 TendingTug1 Survey/Crewboat4 DumpScows

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00

Months @ $

Months @ $

Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $

171,07982,28016,25565,70612,2488,25236,994

171,07900131,412 12,2488,252147,976

171,079

131,412

12,248 8,252 147,976

Total Ownership Costs$ I470,967 I

MarketFactor @

I 50"101 I235,484 I

Total Direct Costs

$Overhead@

~

Sub Total

$1,324,406

Contingency@

132,441

Profit@198,661

Sub Total

$

Bond@I 0.5"101

Total Dredge Price

$ L1,_~3,7861 191,579 I 279,388 I

95,790 I

139,694 I

510,810

76,621

587,431 736,974

58,743

73,697

88,115

110,546

734,289

3,671

737,960 I

925,824 I

1.69 I

2.12 I

84,000 Mobilization Price $----------------=

50,OIJ0 Total Pay Cubic Yards1.68 I $/CY

• I

COST SUMMARYSMALL PROJECT DREDGING WITH DISPOSAL AT TIDAL WETLANDS • SCENARIO 2


Dredge ITransport IPlacement

Mobilizationand Demobilization $ 84,000 I 37,280 I 46,720 IODeratingCosts

1 Clamshell Dredgeo Hyd.Unloader2 Towing Tug1 Tending Tug1 Survey/Crewboat4 DumpScows1 ShoreCrew

1 Superv/Engrg

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00

Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $

268,211358,646224,23280,84043,0396,250140,55584,540

268,2110448,464 80,84043,03925,000050,619

268,211

448,464

80,840 43,039 25,000

22,930

27,689

Total Operating Costs $ 916,173 I 415,020 I 501,153 1

~ership Costs

1 ClamshellDredgeo Hyd.Unloader

I 0 BoosterPump2 TowingTug

I 1 TendingTug1 Survey/Crewboat4 DumpScows

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00

Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $

171,07982,28016,25565,70612,2488,25236,994

171,07900131.412 12,2488,252147,976

171,079

131,412

12,248 8,252 147,976

Total Ownership Costs$ 1470,967 I

MarketFactor @

I 50"101 1235,484 I

Total Direct Costs

$Overhead@

~

Sub Total

$1,324,406

Contingency@

132,441

Profit@198,661

Sub Total

$Bond@

I 0.5"101

Total Dredge Price

$ LJ&63,786 I 191,579 I 279,388 I

95,790 I

139,694 I

510,810

76,621

587,431 736,974

58,743

73,697

88,115110,546

734,289

3,671

737,960 I

925,824 I

1.69 I

2.12 I

84,000 Mobilization Price $----------------=

50,01)0 Total Pay Cubic Yards1.68 I $/CY

•

COST SUMMARYSMALL PROJECT DREDGING WITH DISPOSAL AT LANDFILL REHANDLING FACILITY - S

(21 CY Clamshell Dredge, with Ughtly Loaded Scows, 43 N. Miles)

Mobilization and Demobilization

Total Operating Costs

CENARIO 1I Dredqe ITranspOrt

PI

I

37,280 I 46,720 I ,

268,211

I1,121,160

80,840 43,039 43,75013,254

39,377

I 405,344 I 1,204,287

171,079 328,530

12,248 8,252 258,958191,579

587,488 I

95,790 I

293,744 I

501,133

1,498,031 I75,170

224,705

576,303

1,722,73657,630

172,27486,445

258,410

720,379

2,153,420I

3,602 I10,767 I

723,981

2,164,187

1.66

4.96

84,000 I$

1,609,631 I$

268,211001,121,160 80,84043,03943,750052,631

171,07900328,530 12,2488,252258,958

171,07982,28016,25565,70612,2488,25236,994

268,211434,486144,040224,23280,84043,0396,250140,55552,631


Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $Months @ $

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00

Ownership Costs1 Clamshell Dredgeo Hyd. Unloadero Booster Pump

~ Towing Tug1 Tending Tug1 Survey/Crewboat7 Dump Scows

Ocerating Costs1 Clamshell Dredgeo Hyd. Unloadero Booster Pump5 Towing Tug1 Tending Tug1 Survey/Crewboat

7 Dump Scowso Shore Crew

1 Superv/Engrg

84,000 Mobilization Price $

10,000 Total Pay Cubic Yards8.40 I $/CY

COST SUMMARY

SMALL PROJECT DREDGING WITH DISPOSAL AT LANDFILL REHANDLI~G FACILITY - SCENARIO 2


Dredge ITransport IPlacement

Mobilizationand Demobilization $ 84,000 I 37,280 I 46,720 !ODeratingCosts

1 ClamshellDredgeo Hyd.Unloader2 TowingTug1 TendingTug1 Survey/Crewboat4 DumpScowso ShoreCrew

1 Superv/Engrg

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00


Months @ $

Months @ $


268,211358,646224,23280,84043,0396,250140,55550,619

268,2110448,464 80,84043,03925,000050,619

268,211

448,464

80,840 43,039 25,00022,930

27,689

Total OJX!rating Costs $ 916,173 I 415,020 I 501,153 I

ONnershipCosts

I 1 ClamshellDredg~I 0 Hyd.Unloader

o BoosterPump2 TowingTug1 TendingTug1 Survey/Crewboat4 DumpScows

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.00


171,07982,28016,25565,70612,2488,25236,994

171,07900131,412 12,2488,252147,976

171,079

131,412

12,248 . 8,252 147,976

191,579 I 279,388 I

95,790 I

139,694 I

510,810

76,621

587,431 736,97458,743

73,69788,115

110,546

734,2893,671

737,960 I

925,824 I

1.691

2.121

84,000 Mobilization Price $=

50,000 Total Pay Cubic Yards1.68 I $/CY

APPENDIX Q

Financial Analysis of Implementation Approaches for theLong-Term Management Strategy, Task 3 Report:

Alternative Financing Methods and Institutional Issues

Financial Analysis of ImplementationApproaches for the

Long- Tenn Management Strategy

Task 3 Report:Alternative Financing Methods and Institutional Issues

Prepared for:

u.s. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion 9

San Francisco, California

Prepand by:

Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc.Sacrmnento,~onna

September 30, 1995

with Technical Assistmu:e from:

A. L. Munson & Co.San Francisco, Califonna

Financial Analysis of ImplementationApproaches for the

Long-Term Management Strategy

Task 3 Report: AlternativeFinancing Methods and Institutional Issues

Prepared for:

u.s. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion 9

Sediment Management75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105Contact: Rebecca Tuden

415/744-1987

Prepared by:

Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc.2600 V Street Suite J 00

Sacramento, CA 95818-1914Contact: Thomas Wegge

916/737-3000

with Technical Assistance from:

A.L. Munson & Co.3369 Jackson Street

San Francisco, CA 94118

September 30, 1995

This document should be cited as:

Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc. 1995. Financial analysis of implementation approaches for theI

long-tenn management strategy. Task 3 report: alternative financing methods and institution~issues. September 30, 1995. (JSA 94-316.) Sacramento, CA. Prepared for U.S. Environment~1Protection Agency, Region 9, San Francisco, CA.

Tableof ContentsI!!!

Page

OVERVIEWOF LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY mSTORY 1

Federal Dredging Projects 1Non-Federal Dredging Projects 2

MAJOR LEGISLATION 2

Water Resources Development Act of 1986 2Water Resources Development Act of 1992 3Environmental Laws and Regulations 4

Clean Water, Act 4

Coastal Zone Management Act 5Endangered Species Act 5 .Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act 5

Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuary Act 5National Environmental Policy Act 5Other Regulatory Agencies 6

Impact of Regulatory Trends 6

COST-SHARING POLICIES 7

Maintenance Dredging 7New Construction Dredging 8Acquisition of Disposal Sites 9Cost-Sharing Procedures 9

FINANCING METHODS AVAll..ABLE TO FUND DREDGING ACTIVITIES 10

Financing Methods Currently Used :. 10Financing trom Non-Federal Sources 10Financing trom Federal Sources 11

Other Potentially Available Financing Methods 17Federal Share 17

FEES 25

Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund 25

Dredging Fees 26Private Disposal Fees 27

CASE STUDIES OF DREDGING AND DISPOSAL PROJECTS 27

Port of Oakland Deepening Project (Including the Sonoma Baylands Project) 27Sonoma Baylands Wetlands Restoration Disposal Site 27

Port of Richmond Harbor Deepening Project 28Montezuma Wetlands Restoration Disposal Site 28

INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES 28

Existing Institutional Barriers to Project Financing 29Potential Changes to Eliminate Institutional Barriers 30

Appendix A. Case Studies A-I

PORT OF OAKLAND DEEPENING PROJECT (INCLUDING THE

SONOMA BAYLANDS SITE) A-I

Project Concept A-I

Financial Summary A-2

Financing for Sonoma Baylands A-2

PORT OF RICHMOND DEEPENING PROJECT A-3Project Concept A-3

MONTEZUMA WETLANDS RESTORATION PROJECT A-7

Project Concept A-7

Appendix B. NED Planning and Benefit-Cost Methodology B.IREGULATORY BACKGROUND B-1

NED PLANNING B.2

Valuation Methodology B-2

Time Period B.5

Project Benefits B.5

OM&R Costs B-5

Net NED Benefits B-5

PROVISIONS APPLYING TO ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS B.6

IMPACT ON BENEFICIAL REUSE OF DREDGED MATERIAL B.?

POSSIBLE CHANGES IN PROCEDURES B.g

CITATIONS B.9

Printed References B.9

Personal Communications B-9

11

List of Tables and Figures

Table Page

Non-Federal Share of Construction Costs for New and O&M

. Commercial Navigation Projects 8

2 Non-Federal Cost Share to Deepen Channel to 42 Feet, by Type of PlacementEnvironment Used 10

3 Financing Methods Currently Used to Fund Dredging and Disposal Activities 12

4 Other Potentially Available Financing Methods 19

A·I Estimated Costs for the Oakland Harbor Deepening Project A-4

A·2 Current U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Budget Estimates ofSonoma Baylands Financing A-5

A·3 Cost Sharing: Port of Oakland Dredging Costs A-6

A-4 Port of Richmond Deepening Financing Summary A-7

A·5 Montezuma Wetlands Restoration Financing Summary A-8

B·l Steps in NED Planning Process B-3

Figure

B·l Flowchart of Deep-Draft Navigation.Benefit Evaluation Procedures B-4

111

i i i - u.s. army corps of engineers bay model€¦ · 2 towing tug 1 tending tug 1 survey/crewboat...

Documents