history project 1750-1900

13
1 Written by Matthew Dawson 9TOW Matthew Dawson 9TOW History project the industrial period 1750-1900 AD How Health and Medicine changed over time 1750 1825 1900 1790 Edward Jenner buys! Medical degree from St.Andrews University for £15. 1816, stethoscope, by René Laennec Edward Jenner, FRS, (May 17, 1749 – January 26, 1830 1791 Edward Jenner vaccinates his 18-month- old son with swinepox. In 1798 he vaccinates his son with cowpox. His son will die of TB at the age of 21. 1817, dental plate, by Anthony Plantson Edward Jenner, FRS, (May 17, 1749 – January 26, 1830 1796 Edward Jenner in Gloucestershire, England credited with concept of vaccination. Jenner vaccinates an 8-year-old boy with smallpox pus. Jenner would vaccinate Rapid growth of towns and poor living conditions led to governments getting involved and improving public health 1827 endoscope, by Pierre Segalas QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this pictu QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Upload: anon-28221

Post on 14-Nov-2014

114 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: History Project 1750-1900

1Written by Matthew Dawson 9TOW

Matthew Dawson 9TOW

History project the industrial period

1750-1900 AD

How Health and Medicine changed over time

1750 1825 1900

1790 Edward Jenner buys! Medical degree from St.Andrews University for £15.

1816, stethoscope, by René Laennec

Edward Jenner, FRS, (May 17, 1749 – January 26, 1830

1791 Edward Jenner vaccinates his 18-month-old son with swinepox. In 1798 he vaccinates his son with cowpox. His son will die of TB at the age of 21.

1817, dental plate, by Anthony Plantson

Edward Jenner, FRS, (May 17, 1749 – January 26, 1830

1796 Edward Jenner in Gloucestershire, England credited with concept of vaccination. Jenner vaccinates an 8-year-old boy with smallpox pus. Jenner would vaccinate the boy 20 times. The boy would die from TB at the age of 20.

Rapid growth of towns and poor living conditions led to governments getting involved and improving public health

1827 endoscope, by Pierre Segalas

1801 First widespread experimentation with vaccines begins

Joseph Lister developed a microscope, which could magnify objects 1000 times without distortion in 1830

1802 The British government gives Edward Jenner £10,000 for

1838 Smallpox epidemic in England. Then again in

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 2: History Project 1750-1900

2Written by Matthew Dawson 9TOW

continued experimentation with "smallpox vaccine."

1853

People did not know that germs caused disease

1846, general anesthetic, by James Simpson

In the 1850’s Louis Pasteur, a French scientist, discovered that microorganisms turn beer bad. Pasteur proved through a series of experiments that microbes caused decay. When Pasteur discovered that a specific germ was causing disease amongst silk worms and the French silkworm industry he showed that germs caused disease. The work of Robert Koch proved that germs caused disease amongst humans1851, ophthalmoscope, by Hermann von Helmholtz1853 First use of hypodermic needle for subcutaneous injection.1857 Vaccination in England enforced by fines. Smallpox epidemic begins in England that lasts until 1859. Over 14,000 die.

Vaccination Act of 1867 in England begins to elicit protest from the population and increase in the number of anti-vaccination groups. It compelled the vaccination of a baby within the first 90 days of its life.1867 Joseph Lister introduces sanitation into surgery, over the objections of leading English surgeons.1885, rabies vaccination, chicken cholera vaccination by Louis Pasteur

Page 3: History Project 1750-1900

3Written by Matthew Dawson 9TOW

1887, contact lens, by Adolf Fick

1895, X-ray, by Wilhelm Roentgen

The London Sewer system in 1858 Joseph Bazalgette was an Englishman, born on the 28 march 1819 and who died on the 15th of March 1891. He was most famous for developing the London Sewer system in 1858 which improved waste management and health. In the early 19th century, the River Thames was practically an open sewer, with disastrous consequences for public health in London. Three epidemics of cholera had swept through the city, leaving over 30,000 people dead. Sewage was everywhere, piling up in every gully and alleyway, in the cellars of houses in poor districts - and even seeping through cracks in floorboards. Proposals to modernize the sewerage system had been put forward in 1856, but were shelved due to lack of funds. However, after The Great Stink of 1858, Parliament realized the urgency of the problem and resolved to create a modern sewerage system.

Joseph Bazalgette, a civil engineer and Chief Engineer of the Metropolitan Board of Works, was given responsibility for the work. He designed an extensive underground sewerage system that diverted waste to the Thames Estuary, downstream of the main centre of population. Six main interceptory sewers, totaling almost 100 miles (160 km) in length, were constructed, some incorporating stretches of London's 'lost' rivers.

The effect of the new sewer system was to reduce cholera not only in places that no longer stank, but also water supplies ceased to be contaminated by sewage.He diverted the foul water

He saw to it that the flow of foul water from old sewers and underground rivers was intercepted, and diverted

along new, low-level sewers made from clay which were built behind embankments on the riverfront and taken to

new treatment works. This was a very intuitive idea. Bazalgette's foresight may be seen in planning the

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.QuickTime™ and a

decompressorare needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Memorial To Sir Joseph

Bazalgette On Victoria Embankment

Page 4: History Project 1750-1900

4Written by Matthew Dawson 9TOW

diameter of the sewerpipes. When planning the network he took the densest population, gave every person the most generous allowance of

sewage production and came up with a diameter of pipe needed. If he had used his original, smaller pipe diameter the sewer would have overflowed

in the 1960s. As it is they are still in use to this day,though there is now an extensive programme of sewer replacement. Bazalgette’s work was

greatly appreciated by the public and the government. So much so that he was knighted in 1875, and elected President of the Institution of Civil

Engineers in 1883.

The Newcomen and Watt Steam EnginesThomas Newcomen (1663-1729) was an English blacksmith, who

invented a steam engine. However it was James Watt (19 January 1736 – 25 August 1819), a Scottish inventor and mechanical engineer whose

improvements to the steam engine were fundamental to the changes of the Industrial

Revolution in both Britain and the World. He was, alongside others, the first person

who realized that money was to be made through producing goods in factories with

machines, previously made by hand. However he also knew that they. Machines could be

powered by his steam engines He then applied this with his knowledge of machinery and a

previous invention and made it more efficient. During the 1760s he devoted most of his time to improving the efficiency of steam engines, the mechanical pumps that had been the work of

Thomas Savery and Thomas Newcomen a half-century before. The result was a machine that by

1790 had become so popular that Watt is sometimes now wrongly praised as the inventor

of the steam engine.

He joined Matthew Boulton in business and began selling the Watt steam engine in 1774. It

was his machine that helped the transition between hand tools and horsepower to mass production and machine power. Watt’s many mechanical advances

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

James Watt (19 January 1736 – 25 August 1819)

Page 5: History Project 1750-1900

5Written by Matthew Dawson 9TOW

earned him several patents, and his engines were used for coal mining, textile manufacturing, transportation and a host of other industrial uses. In

1755 Watt had been granted a patent by Parliament that prevented anybody else from making a steam engine like the one he had developed.

This was probably why he was so successful. For the next twenty-five years, the Boulton & Watt Company had a virtual monopoly over the

production of steam engines. Watt charged his customers a premium for using his steam engines. To justify this he compared his machine to a horse. Watt calculated that a horse exerted a pull of 180 lb., therefore, when he made a machine, he described its power in relation to a horse,

i.e. "a 20 horse-power engine". Watt worked out how much each company saved by using his machine rather than a team of horses. The company then had to pay him one third of this figure every year, for the

next twenty-five years. It was ideas like that show he was an entrepreneur instead of an inventor.

Though steam power was not a new idea, the way he and Matthew Boulton monopolized the idea to make a lot of money shows they were

entrepreneurs He retired in 1800, a prosperous and venerated inventor, although it is sometimes pointed out that Watt's stubborn protection of his patents probably slowed other technological advances for many years.

Railways in the railwaysRailways in the industrial era

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

A Watt steam engine, the steam engine that propelled the Industrial Revolution in Britain.

Page 6: History Project 1750-1900

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

6Written by Matthew Dawson 9TOW

The first commercially successful steam locomotive was Matthew Murray's rack locomotive ,The Salamanca built for the narrow gauge

Middleton Railway in 1812.

And it was none other than James Watt, a Scottish inventor and mechanical engineer, was responsible for improvements to the steam

engine of Thomas Newcomen, hitherto used to pump water out of mines. Watt developed a reciprocating engine, capable of powering a wheel.

Although the Watt engine powered cotton mills and a variety of machinery, it was a large stationary engine. It could not be otherwise; the

state of boiler technology necessitated the use of low-pressure steam acting upon a vacuum in the cylinder, and this mode of operation needed a separate condenser and an air pump. Nevertheless, as the construction

of boilers improved, he investigated the use of high-pressure steam acting directly upon a piston. This raised the possibility of a smaller engine, that might be used to power a vehicle, and he actually patented a design for a steam locomotive in 1784. His employee William Murdoch produced a

working model of a self-propelled steam carriage in that year.

This was followed in 1813 by the Puffing Billy built by Christopher

Blackett and William Hedley for the Wylam Colliery Railway, the first successful locomotive running by adhesion only. This was accomplished by the distribution of weight by a number of wheels. Puffing Billy is now

on display in the Science Museum in London, the oldest locomotive in existence.

In 1814 George Stephenson, inspired by the early locomotives of Trevithick, Murray and Hedley, persuaded the manager of the

Killingworth colliery where he worked to allow him to build a steam-powered machine. He built the Blucher, one of the first successful

flanged-wheel adhesion locomotives. Stephenson played a pivotal role in the development and widespread adoption of the steam locomotive. His designs considerably improved on the work of the earlier pioneers. In

1825 he built the Locomotion for the Stockton and Darlington Railway which became the first public steam railway in the world.

Page 7: History Project 1750-1900

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

7Written by Matthew Dawson 9TOW

Letter to factory owner

Dear Mr. factory owner I would like to complain about your use of child labour. I would like to suggest how you could make the lives of your workers better, while still being profitable. Though it is true that you provide valuable work to the children, you usually deprive them of school.Firstly, I am aware that you may not quite receive as much work from the children but I believe they will work a lot harder if they feel they are being treated well. Secondly I would like to point out that you do put your child workers in an extortionate amount of danger. I’m afraid that injuries will never disappear. However I feel that injuries could be dramatically reduced if safety rules were introduced. Also I feel workers could benefit from a days training. Its is common for the children to be working at the same factory as their parents. Therefore we feel there should be as many opportunities to see their parents as possible. Though you should be proud you feed your children 3 times a day, I feel it is malnutrition and lack of sleep that are responsible for injuries, and for slow production. Therefore a little expenditure on your part for some more food will pay you back with higher production. We understand you have to discipline your workers, but harsh punishments could harm your productivity. However I feel no physical punishment should be used at all. Neither should the ‘dark room’ be used on any person. Please can I suggest that you try to teach your Supervisors to use compliments and encouragement to make your workers work harder.It has been proved by the success of factory owner Robert Owen (14 May 1771 – 17 Nov 1858), that good treatment of your workers will pay you back massively with increased productivity. We hope you find these suggestions useful.

Portrait of Robert Owen

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 8: History Project 1750-1900

8Written by Matthew Dawson 9TOW

Living conditions between 1750 and 1900

Living conditions during the Industrial Revolution varied from the luxury of the homes of the owners to the squalor of the lives of the workers. Cliffe Castle, Keighley, is a good example of how the newly rich chose to live. This is a large home modelled loosely on a castle with towers and garden walls. The home is very large and was surrounded by a massive garden, the Cliffe Castle is now open to the public as a museum.

Poor people lived in very small houses in cramped streets. These homes would share toilet facilities, have open sewers and would be at risk of damp. Disease was spread through a contaminated water supply. Conditions did improve during the 19th century, as Public Health Acts were introduced covering things such as sewage, hygiene and house building standards. Not everybody lived in homes like these. The Industrial Revolution created a larger middle class of professionals such as lawyers and doctors. The conditions for the poor improved over the course of the 19th century because of government and local plans which led to cities becoming cleaner places, but life had not been easy for the poor before industrialization. However, as a result of the Revolution, huge numbers of the working class died due to diseases spreading through the cramped living conditions. Chest diseases from the mines, cholera from polluted water and typhoid were also extremely common, as was smallpox. Strikes and riots by workers were also relatively common. Some were not even lucky enough to have a roof. Those, and I assure you there were many; who were injured in factory accidents and could soon lose their jobs,if they were no longer fit for work.They could then end up homeless. Sometimes entire families were homeless when the man of the house lost his job.The living conditions for workers in the Industrial Revolution were terrible. Men, women, and children worked in factories that were hazardous. Pay was low for men. The pay for women was lower and children got paid the least. Factories were dirty and dangerousWorkhouse conditions were deliberately harsh to deter the workers from relying on them. Men and women were segregated and children were separated from their parents. Aged pauper couples were not allowed to

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Over London by Rail Gustave Doré c. 1870. Shows the densely populated and polluted environments created in the new industrial cities

Page 9: History Project 1750-1900

9Written by Matthew Dawson 9TOW

share a bedroom. By entering a workhouse paupers were held to have forfeited responsibility for their children. Education was provided but pauper children were often forcibly apprenticed without the permission or knowledge of their parents. Inmates surrendered their own clothes and wore a distinctive uniform.

There were many well-meaning measures such as education for children and the provision of doctors and chaplains. However most workhouses were run on a shoestring and these gestures often fell far short of providing decent living conditions.

Bibliography http://www.relfe.com/history_1.html

www.wikipedia.co.uk Answers.yahoo.com

www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/victorians/seven_wonders_04.shtml

http://www.nettlesworth.durham.sch.uk/time/victorian/vindust.html