gawad patnugot memorandum-6779

Republic of the PhilippinesDEPARTMENT OF EDTJCATION

REGION IV-A CALABARZONGatc 2- Karangalan Village- Cainta Rizal

MEMORANDUM

To

From

S u bject

Da te

ALL scHoors DrvrsroN su'ERTNTENDE*'t o.to' ;,1.;rr{

. .'."1,.)N) I

CALABARZON GAWAD PATNUGOTProgram on Awards and lncentives for Service Excellence (PrAlSE)via DepEd CALABARZON Search for Treasured Achievers in theRegion (C-STAR)

June 19, 2015.

The Department of Education Region IV-CALABARZON announces the 2015 edition of C-STAR Program through the CALABARZON GAWAD PATNUGOT. This initiative supports the CivilService Commission's Program on Awards and lncentives for Service Excelience (PTAISE).

Aligned to DepEd CALABARZON's mantra, "lt is a Region where Excellence is a Cultureand Quality is a Commitment", this program will recognize exemplary performance of teachers,instructional leaders, and non-teaching personnel who brought honor to their place of work -the Schools Division Offices (SDOs'), the Region and to the Nation as a whole. lt will also giverecognition to Schools and SDos'that made difference on the Education landscape througheffective implementation of School-Based and SDOs' Programs and Projects.

The guidelines, criteria and forms relevant to the Search are enclosed herewith.

Please be guided by the following schedule of activities and specified dates relative tothe said search:

Expenses relative to the said activity shall be charged against localfunds subject to theusual accounting and auditing rules and regulations.

lmmediate and wide dissemination of this Memorandum is desired.

HRDD/afr

Activity Date1. Submission of entries, form,

documents to the Regional Office.August 28, 2015

2. Screening ProcessA. Evaluation of Documents September 1-4, 2015B. Demo-teaching and interviews September 7-11, 2015C. On-site Validation (if needed) September t4-25,2OI5D. Consolidation of Results September 28-October 2, 2015

3. Awardlng CeremonyVenue : To be Announced Later

October 9, 2015

CALABARZON GAWAD PATNUGOTPROGRAM ON AWARDS AND INCNTIVES FOR SERVICE EXCETENCE (PRAISE)

IN DEPED CALABARZON/ PRO6R,AM C-STAR

FORlt, 1. Nomination Form : Category I - 5 & 10 (to be filled-out by nomine)Category:

Name of Nominee:

Position Title:Division:Ofiicial Station/School:Address (Official Station/School)Tel./Fax Number (Ofticial Station/School):Email Address (Official Station/School):Res,dence:Cellphone Number:Email Address:

(to be filled-out by immediate superior)

I hereby nominate(Name)

2* X 2" PICTURE

of(Position Title)

for the(Category)

Nomrnated by:

(lmmediate Superior)

Endorsed by:

(Schoo/s Division Supeintendent)

QAtueol

( Offi c ia I St ation/S c h ool)

of the GAWAD PATNUGOT 2014.

Please be guided by the following schedule of activities and specified dates relative tothe said search:

Expenses relative to the said activity shall be charged against local funds subject to theusual accounting and auditing rules and regulations.

lmmediate and wide dissemination of this Memorandum is desired.

H RDD/.fr

Activity Date1. Submission of entries, form,

documents to the Regional Offlce.August 28, 2015

2. Scree ning ProcessA. Eva luation of Documents September I-4,2075B. Demo-teaching and interviews September 7-11-, 2015C. On-site Validation (if needed) Se pte m be r 14-25 , 2OI5D. Consolidation of Results September 28-October 2, 2015

3. Awarding CeremonyVenue :To be Announced Later

October 9, 2015

CALABARZON GAWAD PATNUGOT

Program on Awards and Incentives for Service Excellence (PRAISE) In DepED CALABARZON/PROGRAM C-STAR

1

GUIDELINES

The CALABARZON GAWAD PATNUGOT is a regional project that aims to support the Civil Service Commissions Program on Awards and Incentives for Service Excellence (PRAISE). Aligned to DepED CALABARZONs mantra. It is a region where excellence is a culture and quality is a commitment, this project will recognize exemplary performance of teachers, instructional leaders, non-teaching personnel who brought honor to their place of work (division), to the region and to the nation as whole. It will also give recognition to schools division and schools that made difference on the educational landscape through effective school-based programs and projects.

1. Recognize schools division and schools; and DepED CALABARZON teachers, school heads; education program supervisors, public schools district supervisors and non-teaching personnel; best/most effective programs and SBM implementers; and most effective action researches.

2. Motivate and inspire DepED CALABARZON personnel to continue improve the quality of their performance towards excellence.

3. Instill deeper commitment to public service.

1. Outstanding Teacher (Elementary and Secondary) 2. Outstanding ALS Mobile Teacher. 3. Outstanding SPED Teacher (Elementary or Secondary) 4. Outstanding Multigrade Teacher 5. Outstanding School Head 6. Outstanding EPS or PSDS 7. Outstanding Non-Teaching Personnel 8. Most Effective School Reading Program (Elementary and Secondary) 9. Best SBM Implementer (Elementary and Secondary) 10. Outstanding Division Sports Program 11. Outstanding Campus Journalism Program 12. Most Effective Action Research (Conducted for the last 2 years, Elementary and

Secondary) 13. Most Effective Division Brigada Eskwela Implementers

RATIONALE

OBJECTIVES

AWARDS CATEGORY



2

1. Filipino Citizen 2. Performance Rating of at least Very Satisfactory (VS) for the last three (3) years 3. Active in the service for not less than five (5) years and must not be on leave at the time

of nomination 4. No pending administrative/civil/criminal case

1. Previous awardees of C-STARs Most Outstanding Teacher 2. Awardee of National Search 3. Persons who have been suspended, reprimanded or with pending cases relative to

violation of any administrative policies, rules and regulations 4. Lone contender in specific category 5. Less than 80% rating of the submitted documents

1. Duly accomplished nomination form 2. Colored photograph (2x2) passport size 3. Nomination by immediate superior/endorsed by Schools Division Superintendent 4. DepED appointment 5. Service Record

1. Plaque of Recognition 2. Certificate of Recognition

1. The Assistant Regional Director, as chair shall organize a selection committee for each category consisting of Chiefs, Team Leaders/Unit Heads from different teams/ units and Education Program Supervisors at the region as members.

2. Each division shall choose the division candidate for the Gawad Patnugot who will undergo final evaluation and interview by the Regional Panel of Judges.

3. Demonstration teaching, interview and validation of submitted documents shall be announced in a specific time.

QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

DISQUALIFICATION

APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS

AWARDS

MECHANICS



3

August 28, 2015 Submission of entries, form, documents to the Regional Office

September 1-4, 2015 Evaluation of Documents

September 7-11, 2015 Demo-teaching and interviews

September 14-25, 2015 On-Site Validation(if needed)

Sept. 28-Oct. 2, 2015 Consolidation of Results

October 9, 2015 Awarding Ceremony Venue: to be announced later

1. MOST OUTSTANDING TEACHER (Elementary & Secondary) DOCUMENTS 50%

A. PERSONAL QUALITIES AND CHARACTER (10 pts.) 1. Model of Integrity in Public and Private Life 5 pts. 2. Good Human Relations in School and Community 5 pts.

Documents Needed: (at least three)

Write-ups about the nominee on his/her personal qualities certified by the principal, district supervisors and PTA president

Write-ups about the nominee by three co-teachers and co-members in socio-civic or religious organization

Write-ups from three community officials, residents and nominees peers

B. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE AND TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS (90 pts)

1 Performance Rating in the last three (3) years at least VS

2. Outstanding Accomplishments in the last three (3) years

Outstanding Employee /Teacher Awards (10 pts) Awardee in school 5 pts. Awardee in district 8 pts. Awardee in division 10 pts.

10 pts.

TIME TABLE

CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION

15 pts.



4

3. Innovations (10 pts. maximum) Innovative teaching approaches/ strategies/ practices/materials in the last 5 years properly documented, approved by immediate superior attested by authorized regional/division official

Action plan adopted in the school/district 2 pts.

Instructional materials/learning kit 3 pts.

Lesson Exemplar/module 5 pts.

Intervention Package 5 pts.

4. Research and Development (15 pts. maximum)

Action research conducted in the school level 5 pts.

Action research conducted in the district level 10 pts.

Action research conducted in the division level 15 pts.

5. Publication/Authorship (10 pts.)

Articles published in a journal/newspaper/magazine of wide circulation 2 pts.

Co-authorship of a book 3 pts.

Sole authorship of the book 10 pts.

6. Education (10 pts.)

Doctoral Degree 10 pts.

Complete Academic requirement for Doctoral Degree 7 pts.

Masters Degree 5 pts.

Complete academic requirements for Masters Degree 3 pts.

Units in M.A. (18-24 units) 2 pts.

7. Trainings and Workshops (20 pts.) 1. Recipient of Scholarship program, short courses, and

study grants- 6 pts. Maximum International 3 pts. National 2 pts. Regional 1 pt. Division 0.5 pt.



5

2. Participation in training activities in each level with the following duration: 5 pts. Maximum

2 to 3 days 4 to 5 days 6 to 7 days 8 days and above National 0.75 pt Regional 0.35 pt. Division 0.20 pt.

National 1 pt Regional 0.5 pt. Division 0.25 pt.

National 1 pt Regional 0.7 pt. Division 0.5 pt.

National 2 pts. Regional 1 pt.

Division 0.5 pt.

3. Relevant Training 5 pts. The nominee served as speaker/resource speaker/ Facilitator in training workshop(s)

National - 3 pts.

Regional - 2 pts.

Division - 1 pt.

4. Additional points 4 pts maximum Nominee served as trainer/coach in a competition in the last 5 years

National Regional Division 1st Placer- 3 pts. 2nd Placer 2 pts. 3rd Placer 1 pt.

1st Placer- 2 pts. 2nd Placer 1 pt. 3rd Placer 0.5 pt.

1st Placer- 1 pt. 2nd Placer 0.5 pt. 3rd Placer 0.25 pt.

DEMONSTRATION TEACHING 30%

1. Mastery of the Subject Matter 2. Classroom management and discipline 3. Congruency of evaluation with the lesson

objectives 4. Effective utilization of Instructional

Materials

- 35 pts. - 25 pts.

- 20 pts.

INTERVIEW 20%

1. Communicative Competence 2. Ability to present ideas 3. Smartness and Alertness 4. Knowledge on the Issue/question 5. Emotional stability

- 30 pts. - 25 pts. - 10 pts. - 25 pts. - 10 pts.

20 pts.



6

2. OUTSTANDING ALS MOBILE TEACHER I. Occupational Competence 50%

1. Outstanding Accomplishments

Planned activities that are responsive to the needs and problems of the community (ALS Centre Classroom Activities)

5%

Sourced-out funds from NGOs, LGUs and other organizations for the implementation of ALS programs/projects

5%

Conceptualized literacy programs /projects

5 %

Published articles on ALS programs/projects

5%

Served as resource person/trainer/ facilitator National 1.75% Regional 1.50% Division 1.25% District 0.50%

5%

Developed community based learning materials

5%

Established functional data-based at the District level

5%

Conducted action research on community-based programs/projects

5%

Research study 5%

Performance Tracking 5%

II. Professional Advancement 20% 1. Doctoral

Full-fledged 20%

Completed Academic Requirements 17.5%

Completed 35 units and above 15%

Completed 23 units and below 12.5%

2. Masters Degree

Full-fledged 10%

Completed Academic Requirements 7.5%

Completed 35 units and above 5%

Completed 23 units and below 2.5%



7

III. In-Service Trainings Attended 10%

1. International Level (3)

5 in-service trainings and up 3.00

4 in-service trainings 2.90




2. National Level (3)






3. Regional Level






4. Division Level






5. District Level






IV. Awards Received 10%

National 4

Regional 3

Division 2

District 1



8

V. Personal Qualities and Character 10% 1. Demonstrated positive traits both private and

public life.

Unquestioned honesty & integrity -2pts

High work ethics -2pts

Trustworthy in the discharge -2pts of duties and obligations

Maintains wholesome relations -2pts with peers and inter-agency partners

Initiates, facilities and builds -2pts Inter-community relations

3. MOST OUTSTANDING ELEMENTARY SPED TEACHERS A. Qualifications:

SPED Teacher handling any of the following classes: a. Fast Learners b. Slow Learners c. Autism d. Hearing Impairment

e. Visual Impairment f. Mental Retardation g. Intellectual Disability h. Learning Disability

B. Criteria:

I. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE & TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS 90 pts. A. Outstanding Contribution in the Special

Education Program 35 pts

1. Introduced/tried out effective approached or innovations in teaching at least 2) which contributed to the improvement of instruction in meeting the needs of special children

10 pts.

2. Written/produced Instructional Materials in SPED a. Modules/Lesson Examples b. Equipment/Teaching Devices c. Technical Paper/Publications

10 pts. 5 pts. 3 pts.

3. Organized/trained socio-cultural activities (i.e. choral group, dance troupe, theatre & drama, arts, club, etc.) and winning coach

10 pts.

4. Graduates (record of number of batches or names of successful graduates)

5pts.



9

B. Leadership 35 pts.

1. Coordinated the organization of classes/implementation of SPED program

District Division Region

2 pts 3pts 5 pts.

2. Conducted in-service training programs

District Division Regional National

2 pts 3 pts. 5 pts. 10 pts.

3. Resource Speaker/Discussant/Demonstration Teacher

District Division Regional National

2 pts 3 pts. 5 pts. 10 pts.

4. Participated in community programs/projects for the development/enhancement of the learners in their areas of interest

(5 pts)

C. Continuous & Dedicated Service 10 pts.

1. Rendering continuous and dedicated service in SPED teaching

5 pts.

2. Rated as SPED teacher with an outstanding performance rating for the last three (3) years

5 pts.

D. Professional Advancement 5 pts. With Masteral units 1 pt. MA Academic requirements 2 pts. MA degree holder 3 pts. With Doctoral units 4 pts. Ph.D./Ed.D degree holder 5 pts.

E. Winning coach National 5pts Regional 4pts

5 pts. Division 3pts School 1pt District 2pts

II. PERSONAL QUALITIES AND CHARACTER 10 pts A. Model of Morality and Integrity in Public and

Private Life

1. Unquestioned honesty and integrity 1 pt. 2. High work ethics 1 pt. 3. Trustworthy in the discharge of duties and

obligations 1 pt.

4. With high level of stress tolerance 1 pt. 5. Virtuous conduct 1 pt.

B. Good human relations in school and community

5 pts.

Note: Documents are needed to support each criterion Additional: Winner coach in the District, Division, Regional, National



10

4. MOST OUTSTANDING SCHOOL HEAD (Elementary & Secondary) I. Occupational Competence 40%

1. Instructional Leadership 15%

Manages the processes and procedures in monitoring student achievement

Ensures utilization of a range of curricular/co-curricular programs and/or strategies

Assesses the effectiveness of curricular/ co-curricular programs and/ or strategies

Utilizes assessment results to improve learning

Creates and manages a school process to ensure student progress is conveyed to students and parents/guardians regularly

Develops/adapts a research-based school program

Assists in implementing an existing, coherent and responsive school-wide curriculum

Addresses deficiencies and sustain successes of current programs in collaboration with teachers and learners

Develops a culture of functional literacy

Manages the introduction of curriculum initiatives in line with DepED policies (e.g. k to 12, Madrasah)

Works with teachers in curriculum review

Enriches curricular offerings based on local needs

Manages curriculum innovation and enrichment with the use of technology

Organize teams to champion instructional innovation programs toward curricular responsiveness

Prepares and implements an instructional supervisory plan

Conducts instructional supervision using appropriate strategy

Evaluate lesson plans as well as classroom and learning management

Provides in a collegial manner timely, accurate and specific feedback to teachers regarding their performance

Provides expert technical assistance and instructional support to teachers.



11

2. Administrative Management Skills 15%

Manages the implementation, monitoring and review of the SIP/AIP and other action plans

Establishes and maintains specific programs to meet the needs of identified target groups

Takes the lead in the design of a school physical plant and facilities improvement plan

Allocates/prioritizes funds for improvement and maintenance of school physical facilities according to set guidelines

Oversee school operations and care and use of school facilities according to set guidelines

Institutionalizes best practices in managing and monitoring school operations thereby creating a safe, secure and clean learning environment

Assigns/hires appropriate support personnel to manage school operations

Prepares a financial management plan

Develops a school budget which is consistent with SIP/AIP

Generates and mobilizes financial resources

Manages school resources in accordance with DepEd policies and accounting rules and regulations and other pertinent guidelines

Accepts donations, gifts, bequests and grants in accordance with RA 9155

Manages a process for the registration, maintenance and replacement of school assets and dispositions of non-reusable properties

Organizes a procurement committee and ensures that the official procurement process is followed

Utilizes fund for approved school programs and projects reflected in SIP/AIP

Monitors utilization, recording and reporting funds and accounts from school funds

Prepares financial reports and submit/communicates the same to higher authorities and other educational partners

3. School Performance(3 years) based on NAT/REAT and Academic/Co-Curricular Activities/A&E (ALS)

10%



12

II. Outstanding Accomplishment 30% 1. Outstanding Employee Award 7% 2. Award from other agency 4% 3. Innovations/Creativity 5% 4. Research 4% 5. Publication/Authorship 5% 6. Consultancy/Speakership 5%

III. Professional Growth 20% 1. Education (10%)

Doctoral Degree 10pts

Complete Academic Requirements for Doctoral Degree

7 pts


Complete academic requirement for Masters Degree

3 pts.

Units in M.A. (18-24 units) 6pts.

2. Training (7%) 3. Position and Accomplishment to

professional organization (3%)

IV. Personal Characteristics 10%

5. OUTSTANDING EDUCATION PROGRAM SUPERVISOR (EPS) and PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT SUPERVISOR (PSDS) I. Occupational Competence 30%

1. Instructional Leadership 20%

Supervises the management of the processes and procedures in monitoring student achievement

Ensures utilization of a range of assessment processes to assess student performance

Assesses the effectiveness of curricular/co-curricular programs and/or strategies

Helps out in the utilization of assessment results to improve learning

Assists in implementing an existing, coherent and responsive curriculum

Addresses deficiencies and sustain successes of current programs in collaboration with school heads and teachers

Supports the development of a culture of functional literacy



13

Oversees the introduction of curriculum initiatives in line with DepED policies (e.g. K to 12, Madrasah)

Works with school heads in curriculum review

Render assistance in enriching curricular offerings based on local needs

Supervises the management of curriculum innovation and enrichment with the use of technology

Organize teams to champion instructional innovation programs toward curricular responsiveness

Prepares and implements an instructional supervisory plan

Conducts instructional supervision using appropriate strategy

Evaluates supervisory plans of school heads

Provides in a collegial manner timely, accurate and specific feedback to school heads and teachers regarding their performance

Provides expert technical assistance and instructional support to school heads and teachers

2. Curriculum Innovation/ Creativity

10%

II. Outstanding Accomplishment 30% 1. Outstanding Employee Award 7% 2. Award from other agency 4% 3. Innovations/Creativity 5% 4. Research 4% 5. Publication/Authorship 5% 6. Consultancy/Speakership 5%

III. Professional Growth 20% 1. Education (10%)

Doctoral Degree 10pts

Complete Academic Requirements for Doctoral Degree

7 pts


Complete academic requirement for Masters Degree

3 pts.

Units in M.A. (18-24 units) pts.

2. Training (7%)

3. Position and Accomplishment to professional organization (3%)

IV. Community Involvement 10%

V. Personal Characteristics 10%



14

6. OUTSTANDING MULTIGRADE TEACHER

I. INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE AND TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS 70 pts A. Competence in Teaching MG Classes as Evidenced by high

performance evaluation obtained as a teacher and pupil

achievements

A.1 Performance Rating as MG Teacher for the last two years preceding the search

(maximum of 5pts.)

Outstanding 5 pts.

Very Satisfactory 3 pts.

Documents to be submitted:

Certified true copy of Performance Rating for the last two yearS

A. 2. Pupils Performance (maximum of 5 pts.) Academic Performance of pupils (Mean Percentage Score) in English, Mathematics and Science for the last 2 school years preceding the search (S.Y. 2013-2015; S.Y. 2014-2015) based on the National Achievement Test (NAT).

75% - above 5 pts.

74-70 4.5 pts.

69-65 4 pts.

64-60 3.5 pts.

59-55 3 pts.

54-50 2.5 pts.

49-45 2 pts.

44-40 1.5 pts.

39-below 1 pt.


Certified copy of the Division Consolidated Reports

of Test Results where the schools are ranked.

A.3. Percentage increase of the class reading level for the last 2

years (maximum of 5 pts.)

5 % increase 5 pts.

4% increase 4 pts.

3% increase 3 pts.

2% increase 2 pts.

1% increase 1 pts.


Certified School Reading Level Reports



15

B. Outstanding Contribution in the Education of MG Children (40 pts.)

B.1 Years in service as MG Teacher (maximum of 5 pts.)

10 years above 5 pts.

8 9 years 4 pts.

6 7 years 3 pts.

4 5 years 2 pts.

3 years 1 pts.


Certified true copy of Service Record

B.2 Introduced and tried-out innovative teaching approaches which contributed to the improvement of instruction MG classes (10 pts.)

2pts. per innovative teaching strategy introduced/used (maximum of 10 pts.)

Documents to be submitted: Photocopies of model lesson plans utilizing said approached/teaching strategies duly certified by the principal/supervisor mentioning the extent of use (school, district, division, regional or national)

B.3. Instructional/Teaching Devices prepared, utilized in teaching shared with other schools. (15 pts.) 1 pt. per material (maximum of 15 pts.) Documents to be submitted: Photos of innovative teaching devices using indigenous/local materials prepared and utilized duly certified by the principal/supervisor.

B.4. Evaluate materials prepared and utilized to improve teaching and pupils performance in MG classes (10 pts.)

1 per evaluative material (maximum of 10 pts.) Documents to be submitted: Photocopies of sample assessment instruments prepared and utilized (Periodic tests, summative test, rubrics, etc.) include brief description and extent of use whether school, district, division, regional or national level)



16

B.5. Research and Creative Output (5 pts.)

1 pt. per research work (maximum of 3 pts.) 1 pt. per published/unpublished work (maximum of 2 pts.)


Certified true copies of action researches and other studies conducted related to teaching (except those presented for Post Graduate Studies)

Copies of published and unpublished work of poetry, musical composition, essay/article (state name of magazine and other periodicals where published, e.i. The Philippine Journal of Education, The Modern Teacher, School paper, local newspapers and other journals)

C. Leadership Potentials (15 pts.) C.1 Involvement in co-curricular activities (10 pts)

a. As Demonstrator Teacher (3 pts.) Served as model demonstration teacher of MG classes (school, district, regional and national levels)

Regional/National level 3 pts.

Division level 2 pts.

District level 1 pt.


Certification from the principal/supervisor as model demonstration teacher (include pictures)

b. As Facilitator ( 4 pts) Served as facilitator/resource person/discussant in seminars (school, district, regional and national levels) 1 pt. Per instance (maximum of 4 pts.)

National Level 4 pts.

Regional Level 3 pts.

District Level 2 pts.

School Level 1 pt.


Certification from the principal/supervisor as facilitator/resource

person/ discussant.



17

c. As Trainer/Adviser/Coach

Organized/trained socio-cultural activities for MG children such as choral group, speech, drama, theater and arts, etc.

Adviser of school clubs such as Math club, Science, English, etc.

Coach of pupil/student winners in Academic, literary, musical, arts, dance and sports competitions.

Organized remedial and enrichment programs in Math, Science and English or other subject areas.

1pt per involvement (maximum of 3 pts.)

National Level 4 pts.

Regional Level 3 pts.

District Level 2 pts.

School Level 1 pt.


Certification from the principal/supervisor for organizing/training socio-cultural activities for MG children such as choral group, speech, drama, theater and arts, etc.

Certification from the principal/supervisor as adviser of school clubs such as Math club, Science, English, etc.

Certification from the principal/supervisor as Coach of pupil/student winners in Academic, literary, musical, arts, dance and sports competitions. (certificate of recognition, pictures, etc.)

Certification from the principal/supervisor for organizing remedial and enrichment programs in Math, Science and English or other subject areas.



18

C.2 Awards received for the last 5 years ( 2 pts.) Recipient of school/ district/ division/ regional awards of

recognition for exemplary services as MG teacher.

Recipient of local/municipal awards of recognition as model citizen/mother/father/family etc.

1 pt. per awards (maximum of 2pts.)


Certified true copies of awards of recognition of awards received

C.3 School projects initiated, implemented and being maintained (3 pts.) include brief description of each (maximum of 3 pts.)

1pt. per project (maximum of 3 pts.)

Documents to be submitted: Certification from the principal for initiating schools projects (include documentation and pictures)

II. PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 20 pts. A. Professional Qualities (10 pts.)

1. Educational Attainment

M.A. Degree Doctoral Degree 3 pts.

M.A. Complete Academic Requirements 2pts.

With masters degree units 1pt.

Documents to be submitted: Certified true copies of transcript of records for highest degree obtained or being pursued.

2. Seminars/workshops/trainings attended (2 pts.)

International/National 2.0 pts.

Regional 1.5 pts.

Division 1.0 pt.

School/District 0.5 pt.

Documents to be submitted: Certified true copies of certificates of participation and attendance in seminars, workshops and other training advancement.



19

3. Punctuality and Attendance (3 pts.)

Reports on attendance (for the last 2 years)

Certificate from principal/supervisor in terms of submitting reports.

Certificate from principal/supervisor on required school activities attended.

4. Subscription of professional magazines for the last 2 years and shared insights with others (1pt.) (Access to professional magazines on a regular basis maybe considered)

International/National 1 pt.

Local 0.5 pt.

Documents to be submitted: Photocopy of journal on the articles read with their reaction. Certification from the principal/supervisor/teachers with whom insights were shared.

B. Community Involvement (10 pts.)

1. Active membership in civic and religious organizations (e.g. Barangay Disaster Brigade, Jaycees, CWL, Rotary, Lions Club, Kiwanis, etc. 0.5 pt. Per organization (maximum of 2.0 points


Certificate of membership from the president of the organization Duly certified membership I.D. photocopy

2. Resource Generation, Support and Networking (8 pts.)

Initiated school/class activities that resulted to improvement of the community (e.g. barangay cooperatives, livelihood projects, functional literacy etc.) 2 pts. per school/class activity (maximum of 6 pts.)


a. Certificate of recognition/participation from the principal/district supervisor/Baranngay Chairperson

b. Other evidences such as photos, project by-laws, etc. c. Description of activities (who,what, when,where, how status)



20

Networking Non-governmental services/resources drawn to the school to help improve school/community environment

1 pt. per services/resources (maximum of 2 points)


a. Certificate of participation from the NGO b. Evidences such as photos, etc. c. Description of services drawn to the school (who,what, when,where,

how status)

III. PERSONAL QUALITIES AND CHARACTER 10 pts. Model of morality and integrity and good human relations in the school and in the community (10 pts.)

Demonstrates honesty, humility, dedication, diligence, good faith, courtesy, generosity, kindness, love and concern for children.

Demonstrates personal sacrifices for the good of the service.

Demonstrates good relations with pupils, co-teachers, schoolhead, principal and community.


Submit 2 names of nominees include immediate superiors with their write-ups about the nominee.

Submit 3 names of nominees co-teachers and co-members in socio-civic or religious organization with their write-ups about the nominee.

Note: Interview with some community officials, residents and nominees peers by the Regional Selection Committee (to be done during the visit) All documents must be authenticated by proper authorities.



21

7. MOST OUTSTANDING NON-TEACHING PERSONNEL This award is granted to an employee who has demonstrated exemplary service and

conduct based on the norms of behaviour described under Republic Act No. 6713, and sustained work performance over and above the normal requirements of his/her position.

The criteria for this type of award are as follows:

1. Performance Rating of at least 9.0 for CY 2013 10%

2. Personal Characteristics 80%

Documents Needed: (at least three) Write-ups/testimonies about the nominee on his/her

personal qualities certified by the principal, district supervisor

and PTA President

Write-ups/testimonies about the nominee by three teachers

and co-members in socio-civic or religious organization

Write-ups/testimonies from three community officials,

residents and nominees peer

Outsourcing/Networking Capability (10%) Resourcefulness capacity/ability to find or adopt means, or

ingenuity in meeting any kind of situation; initiative to recycle

materials; access to materials to be used in the performance

of a job; ability to tap other sources (funding support,

materials support, manpower support) (5%)

Ability to establish linkages with co-workers and other offices

(5%)

Creative Ability (20%) Manifests originality in assessing/processing information (5%)

Uses effective ways of accomplishing work (5%)

Creates/Devises/Innovates activities that lead to efficiency of

his/her work (5%)

Adopts/Adapts ones work style to prevailing/current

conditions (5%)



22

Sphere of knowledge, skills and attitude (15%) Shares with peers and superiors effective ways to accomplish

tasks (5%)

Demonstrates to peers and superiors effective ways of

accomplishing tasks (5%)

Models positive work values punctuality and attendance,

completion of work ahead of time schedule, concern for

others needs, rendering service beyond the call of duty,

encourages and helps peers and superiors accomplish work

assignment with minimum supervision (5%)

Self-improvement and development program (10%) Professional undergoes continuing relevant studies/learning

opportunities (5%)

Personal shares knowledge with others, helps improve skills

of peers, communicate effectively both in oral and written

communication, accepts assignment/tasks that are

challenging but are broadening the area of concern (5%)

Interpersonal Relationships (25%) No incident of misunderstanding, valid complaints with peers,

subordinates and superiors (5%)

Not a recipient of a memorandum for conduct unbecoming of

an employee (5%)

Acceptable with peers, subordinates and superiors (5%)

No administrative complaint/case filed against him/her (5%)

Accepts and uses feedback from subordinates, peers and

superiors (5%)

3. Outstanding Accomplishments 10%



23

8. MOST EFFECTIVE SCHOOL READING PROGRAM

The School Reading Program includes teaching reading in the classroom and reading intervention

program in both English and Filipino which is being implemented for the last two years.

Note: Pertinent documents must be prepared for all indicators

Indicators Descriptions Means of

Verification

Very Evident

Evident Moderately

Evident

3 2 1

Well-planned 25 %

Availability of project document including work plan

Congruence of needs and project objectives

Availability of budget of work in teaching reading and intervention program indicating instructional sequence and time allocation

Articulation of instructional content and strategies in teaching reading in regular classes and intervention programs

Development of modules/

worksheets/

other instructional materials

Development of teachers competence to implement the program

Ex. Work plan for the last two years

Data-Driven 25%

Availability of baseline data

Analysis of baseline data

Administration of continuing reading assessments (multi-forms)

Utilization of research results in program planning and implementation

Effective 40%

Evidence of progress on the reading level of the learners

Existence of culture of reading in schools

Contribution in improving school performance image

Evidence of sustainability of the program

Collaborative

10% Involvement of parents and other

stakeholders

Existence of partnerships in implementing the reading program

Existence of feedback mechanisms



24

9. BEST SBM IMPLEMENTER (Elementary and Secondary) Division entry:

a. (1) elementary and (1) secondary with SBM Level II practice. b. School Head must be at least 2 years assigned in the school

Principle 1: Leadership and Governance (30%) Examples of Evidence Practices

1. Realization of DO #36, s. 2013, One DepEd Vision, Mission and Core Values (One DepEd VMV) as guide in developing and implementing the SIP

2. Utilization of varied tools/equipment/strategy to enhance understanding and application of One DepEd VMV vis-a-vis schools SIP, instructional and governance practices

3. Number of consultative assemblies held with active involvement of stakeholders in the achievement of One DepEd VMV

4. Active involvement of students, parents, and the community in planning, implementing, and evaluating the achievement of One DepED VMV

5. Clear and structured shared decision making with define roles and responsibilities of stakeholders

6. Utilization of the SBM-APAT to monitor decentralization of school management 7. Existing school programs and projects for training students on effective leadership 8. Involvement of students in school governance 9. Involvement of students in assessing performance of school staff 10. Techniques used in designing the school organizational chart 11. Methods used in distribution of teaching loads, special assessment 12. School heads leadership governance style as perceived by staff 13. Voluntary services rendered by the staff beyond office hours 14. Financial and material support the school head gets from the stakeholders, particularly from the

LGUs.

Artifacts 1. DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2013 2. Places where One DepEd VMV are displayed 3. The School Improvement Plan 4. School Profile, School Report Card 5. School Head annual report to stakeholders on school accomplishments 6. School Head/Department Heads Professional Development Plan 7. State of the school address of the school head 8. School organizational chart 9. Documents on School Budget Allocations 10. Personnel evaluation system/Performance Rating 11. Staff and Student Handbooks (if any) 12. School Incentive/Reward System for staff, students, school community 13. Report on Accomplishments of Pupil/Student Government



25

Principle 2: Curriculum and Learning (40%) Examples of Evidence Practices

1. Contextualization of the K to 12 BEC 2. Utilization of students needs assessment results for making instructional, remedial, and

enhancement programs 3. Learning systems regularly monitored using appropriate tools 4. Provision for individual differences 5. Integration of subject matter across discipline, grade/year levels 6. Team building practices 7. Use of action research to discover new knowledge and reconstruct old ones 8. Methods of instructional leadership being used 9. Implementation of the Dropout Reduction Program 10. Researches on teaching-learning innovations 11. Utilization of Student Portfolio to track learning progress 12. Kinds of assessment techniques used 13. Active involvement in class activities because students enjoy learning 14. Using a variety of assessment in evaluating student program. 15. On-going analysis and use of test results to improve student learning. 16. On-going parent-teacher dialogues on how to improve learning outcomes. 17. Providing training on how to identify learning gaps and how to address them. 18. Using class progress charts to track down least-mastered competence. 19. Utilization of assessment results to improve learning 20. Discussing students report cards with parents. 21. Records of results of interventions 22. Records of changes in student exams/behaviors 23. Graphics (charts, dialogues) showing changes in student tests 24. Benchmarking successful assessment practices.

Artifacts 1. Student Portfolio 2. Staff and Student Handbooks 3. Lesson Plans 4. Periodical and End-of the year reports 5. Professional Development Program 6. Curriculum Guides, Teachers Guide, Learning Materials/Syllabus 7. Student Learning Program 8. NAT Results (last 2 years) 9. Table of Specifications/Budget of Work per learning area 10. Students learning plans 11. Report on results: application of teaching-learning innovation/s 12. Remedial Programs 13. Dropout Reduction Program



26

Principle 3: Accountability and Continuous Improvement (15%) Examples of Evidence Practices

1. Clear & defined roles and responsibilities of accountable person/staff assigned to tasks and they are qualified to perform

2. Staff training and development plans are aligned and responsive to learners needs. 3. Transparency and judicious use of school MOOE/canteen funds 4. Local community actively involved in various school committees 5. Holding of education summit, meetings, assemblies 6. Feedback mechanism, information collection and validation techniques 7. Information communication technology used to support instructional and management

programs 8. Transparency Board located in conspicuous place

Artifacts 1. Records of School MOOE and Liquidation Report 2. Records of financial transactions/donations 3. Crises management plan 4. Canteen Report 5. Special education program of activities 6. PTCA records of annual programs and projects with corresponding audited financial report 7. School building and facilities built by LGUs & NGOs in last 2 years 8. Pledges of Commitment from Stakeholders 9. Records of contributions from stakeholders used to finance programs/projects 10. Records of events/activities held spearheaded by stakeholders

Principle 4: Management of Resources (15%) Examples of Evidence Practices

1. Record of resource allocation and mobilization 2. Regular planning, monitoring and resource programming 3. Experienced teacher coaching and nurturing new teachers or those who request assistance 4. Monitoring report on BrigadaEskwela 5. Report on the School Feeding Program 6. System that manages network and linkages for improving resource management 7. Benchmarking resource management practices. 8. PTCA (or any form of school-community partnership) raising funds to support schools drive for

judicious resource management

Artifacts 1. BEIS 2. Report on BrigadaEskwela 3. Nutritional Status report 4. School Feeding Program 5. School heads and staffs professional development plans 6. School influencing surrounding schools to perform well 7. Performance Indicators 8. Records of best practices institutionalized/shared to neighboring school



27

SCORING INSTRUCTIONS:

1. The four (4) principles were assigned percentage weights for the school operation according to the validated practices (40%) with corresponding points below:

0.0 - 0.50 = 25 pts. 0.51 - 1.50 = 50 pts. 1.51 - 2.50 = 75 pts. 2.51 - 3.00 = 100 pts.

*Each principle has several indicators. Based on the results of the D-O-D (Document Analysis, Observation, Discussion), the evidence is summarized.

2. Based on Improved Learning Outcomes (60%), National Achievement Test for the last 2 years, SY 2012-2013 and SY 2013-2014 with corresponding points below: 10% increment = 25 pts. 20% increment = 50 pts. 50% increment = 100 pts.

1. Leadership and Governance

STANDARD: The school provides leadership that inspires and empowers for high achievement and governance that fosters commitment, participation, informed-decision making, and shared accountability; and continuously improves its communication system and relationships with and among stakeholders, based on mutual respect, understanding, and a common concern for improved learning outcomes and school services.

Indicators 0 1 2 3 Evidence 1.1. Has in placed advisory/governing body composed of stakeholder

representatives that: makes policies and formulate plans to guide school operations in order to meet standards and ensure compliance with educational laws and policies; recognizes the executive prerogatives of the school head; and provides oversight information and advice

1.2.Shares decision making at various levels of the school organization 1.3. Provides rich and varied opportunities for stakeholders, particularly

the parents, to lead/initiate activities towards improving learner outcomes

1.4. Observes professional and ethical conduct in dealing with stakeholders.

1.5. Has a functional student government that develops learners for democratic leadership and citizenship

1.6. Provides opportunities to teachers to exercise leadership in their areas of specialization

1.7. Has an incentive system in place, collaboratively developed with stakeholders, that encourages a culture of hard work, honesty, fairness, teamwork, and excellent performance



28

Total: _____________________________________________ Weighted Mean: ____________________________________ Weighted Percentage: _______________________________ 2. Curriculum and Learning

STANDARD: The school implements a research and experienced-based curriculum that meets national requirements; responds to local needs and expectations of its stakeholders, uses innovative instructional strategies to facilitate achievement for all learners; and implements a comprehensive assessment system, based on clearly stated learning expectations and utilizes the assessment results to improve student performance and school effectiveness.

Indicators 0 1 2 3 Evidence

2.1. Provides curricular programs that address the felt needs or individual differences of the learners and the development needs of the community

2.2. Establishes articulation between and among curricular programs in different subjects at all levels to enhance integrative learning

2.3. Makes the curriculum flexible so that it can readily respond to emergent needs, challenges, and opportunities, and adapt to local cultural conditions

2.4 Initiates learning programs based on clearly stated learner outcomes and encourages experimentation and risk-taking in providingsolutions to teaching problems

2.5. Uses a system whereby learners manage their own learning and assumes personal responsibility and accountability for learner outcomes

2.6. Benchmarks best practices in school and those in other schools to improve learning

Indicators 0 1 2 3 Evidence 1.9. Conducts a general assembly at the start of the school year to

orient stakeholders on school targets and programs and at the end of the school year, to appraise results and make necessary adjustments

1.10. Culminates achievement through quarterly or end of the year exhibits of learners best products and performances

1.11. Conducts teacher-parent meetings, at the end of each quarter and school year, to appraise and improve learner progress

1.12. Renders a progress report to parents/community at least twice a year (at end of semester and school year) and plans with them to accelerate progress

1.13. Conducts aggressive recruitment and early registration in January of each school year, giving special attention to learners with special needs and those at-risk of not going to school, and providing early interventions to those at-risk of dropping out

1.14. Provides teachers a comprehensive capacity-building and development program that includes meeting, coaching/mentoring, LAC sessions and online training, to support their professional development.



29


2.7. Employs best teaching practices to develop skills: critical and creative thinking and problem solving, informed decision making, and command of fundamental processes

2.8. Actively involves learners in planning, implementing and evaluating instructions

2.9. Uses the community as learning laboratory to facilitate practical application of KSA learned in school and enhance technology transfer to the community

2.10. Monitors school climate and takes necessary steps to ensure that it is conducive to learning

2.11. Provides varied and meaningful activities for interaction, cooperative, group-based, as well as, individualized self-directed learning

2.12. Utilizes both formal and non-formal alternative learning modalities to enhance achievement for all learners

2.13. Has in place a functional assessment system, handled by a quality management team whose roles and responsibilities are clearly defined

2.14. Uses performance measures and techniques that yield valid and reliable quantitative and qualitative data

2.15. Utilizes assessment data for making decisions to improve student performance

2.16. Conducts systematic analysis of the impact of existing school instructional and administrative practices on student performance and utilizes the results of the analysis for designing more effective strategies

2.17. Holds meetings, consultations, fora, symposia, and focus group sessions to communicate assessment results and discuss necessary actions to take

2.18. Maintains a secure, accurate, and functional student tracking system (STS) in accordance with existing laws, policies, rules and regulations

2.19. Uses innovative strategies that enable students to identify their strengths and learning deficiencies and initiate appropriate action to harness/correct them

2.20. Demonstrates significant improvement in learning outcomes

Total: ______________________________________________ Weighted Mean: _____________________________________ Weighted Percentage: _________________________________



30

3. Accountability and Continuous Improvement STANDARD: The school implements a comprehensive quality assurance and accountability mechanisms, based on clearly stated mandate and expectations; utilize evaluation results to improve performance and school effectiveness; provides technical assistance to teachers and non-teaching personnel to cater the aspiration and expectations of the stakeholders; and make use of the DepEd vision and mission to guide the continuous improvement of learning outcomes and school services for achieving the national goal of functional literary for all.


1.1. Alignsannual and long-term improvement plans to DepEd vision, mission, and purpose

1.2. Uses vision, mission, and purpose as standards in evaluating school programs

1.3. Has in place functional teams with clearly defined terms of reference

1.4. Maintains and upgrades its Information and Communication System so that it can provide the necessary information for the stakeholders

1.5. Has School Professional Development Plan for continuing professional education for teachers and other personnel

1.6. Provides training and development programs on competencies that advance the school vision and purpose in support of the school improvement plan

1.7. Manifests judicious use of MOOE/canteen funds

1.8. Involves stakeholders in various programs and activities

1.9. Holds summit, meetings and assemblies for stakeholders to gather data, disseminate information and engage them for continuous improvement

1.10. Regularly informs external stakeholders through formal or informal communication channels, about progress of school-community programs as well as status of student performance

1.11. Adopts feedback mechanisms, data collections and validation techniques for the purpose of transparency

Total: ______________________________________________ Weighted Mean: _____________________________________ Weighted Percentage: _________________________________



31

4. Management of Resources STANDARD: The school provides the resources necessary to implement the curriculum and the school improvement plan. The resources are managed with efficiency and transparency. The improvement of learning outcomes is given priority in allocation of resources.

Indicators 0 1 2 3 Evidence 4.1. Observes accounting and auditing rules and regulations in managing

school resources

4.2. Allocates adequate resources to programs and activities that have direct impact on learner outcomes

4.3. Protects instructional time from being used for non-instructional activities

4.4. Regularly upgrades and expands its blended multi-media materials, equipment and facilities and uses them optimally to support learning

4.5. Operates a coaching, mentoring, and counseling pool served by volunteer students, alumni, retirees, and other individuals and entities, for the improvement of student performance and school services

4.6. Offers (functional) student welfare services (canteen, medical, dental, counseling, career/vocational guidance) that meet stakeholders expectations

4.7. Maintains physical facilities, materials and equipment to provide an environment that is, safe, healthful, orderly and conducive to learning

4.8. Orients new staff (teaching and non-teaching) to school policies, standards and programs

4.9. Has in place a system of helping teachers identify and respond appropriately to their performance needs and challenges

Total: ______________________________________________ Weighted Mean: _____________________________________ Weighted Percentage: ______________________________



32

10. OUTSTANDING SPORTS PROGRAM

CRITERIA FOR RATING

Contributions to the Development of Sports Program 30%

Awards Received 25%

Participation in Sports Competitions 20%

Officials Involvement in Sports Competitions/Activities 15%

Sports Related Trainings Conducted 10%

Rubrics Percentage

A. Contributions to the Development of Sports Program (30%)

1. Division Sports Program Implemented (15%)

Three Sports Program with at least one event participated in the international competitions

15

Three Sports Program with at least one event participated in the national competitions

10

Three Sports Program with at least one event participated in the regional competitions

7

2. Stakeholders Support to the Program (9%) (Private Institution/Individual)

9

Generated at least one Million 9

Generated at least PhP750,000.00 PhP999,000.00 6

Generated at least PhP 500,000.00 PhP749,000.00 3

3. Sports Official as Lecturer/Resource Speaker (6 %)

Has given talk/lecture in international sports convention/ conference 6

Has given talk/lecture in national sports convention/conference 4

Has given talk/lecture in regional sports convention/conference 2

B. Awards Received (25%)

1. International Competition (12 %)

Athlete/s won first place in international sports competitions 12

Athlete/s won second place in international sports competitions 8

Athlete/s won third place in international sports competitions 5

2. National Competition (8 %)

Athlete/s won first place in national sports competitions 8

Athlete/s won second place in national sports competitions 5

Athlete/s won third place in national sports competitions 3

3. Regional Competition (5 %)

Athlete/s won first place in regional sports competitions 5

Athlete/s won second place in regional sports competitions 3

Athlete/s won third place in regional sports competitions 1

C. Participation in Sports Competitions (No. of Athletes, Coaches, Chaperons and Trainers)

(20%)

1. International (9 %)

Ten(10) and above participated in international sports competitions 9

Five (5) to nine (9) participated in international sports competitions 6

Four (4) and below participated in international sports competitions 3



33

2. National (7%)

Fifty (50) and above participated in national sports competitions 7

Twenty five (25) to forty nine (49) participated in national sports competitions 5

Twenty four (24) and below participated in national sports competitions 3

3. Regional (4 %)

Four hundred seventy five(475) participated in the regional sports competitions 4

Four hundred seventy four (474) to three hundred (300) participated in regional sports competitions

3

Two hundred ninety nine (299) and below participated in the regional sports competitions

1

D. Officiating Officials Involvement in Sports Competitions/Activities (15%)

1. International (7 %)

Five (5) and above officials rendered services/officiated in international sports competitions

7

Three (3) to four (4) officials rendered services/officiated in international sports competitions

5

One (1) to two (2) officials rendered services/officiated in international sports competitions

3

2. National (5 %)

Seven (7) and above officials rendered services/officiated in a national sports competition

5

Four (4) to six (6) rendered services/officiated in a national sports competition 3

One(1) to three (3) officials rendered services/officiated in the national sports competition

1

3. Regional (3 %)

Thirty (30) and above officials rendered services/officiated in the regional sports competitions

3

Twenty (20) to twenty-nine officials rendered services/officiated in the regional sports competitions

2

One (1) to nineteen (19) officials rendered services/officiated in the regional sports competitions

1

E. Sports Related Trainings Conducted (10%)

Conducted at least three (3) trainings in the division 5

Conducted at least two (2) trainings in the division 3

Conducted at least one (1) training in the division 1

TOTAL (100%)

Note: Only the highest level of participation shall be given credit Each criterion must be supported with documents certified by the Schools Division

Superintendent Non-cash donations can be converted into cash



34

11. OUTSTANDING CAMPUS JOURNALISM PROGRAM

CRITERIA FOR THE REGIONAL SEARCH FOR OUTSTANDING CAMPUS JOURNALISM PROGRAM IMPLEMENTER

General Guidelines 1. The Regional Office shall conduct the selection of one Outstanding Campus Journalism Program

Implementer 2. Each division should have one entry for this category based on the criteria provided for by the

Regional Office 3. Each school-candidate shall be ranked based on the total points garnered. The top three (3) shall

be given the following equivalent points, for consideration in the computation of the overall standing of the division, to wit:

1st place - 5 points 2nd place - 3 points 3rd place - 1 point

4. The Selection Committee shall be composed of the following: Chairman: Chief of the CMLT; Members: Regional EPS in charge of Campus Journalism, two Regional Education Program Supervisors, and President of the Regional School Paper Advisers Association.

5. Basic Qualification: Must have been implementing and completing in campus journalism related contests in any levels at least five (5) consecutive years. The following criteria will determine the winner for this search.

A. Achievement in Journalism Contests for the past three years (55 points) Individual Contests 20 pts.

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th National Level 20 19 18 17 16 15 14

Regional Level 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 Division Level 6 5 4 3 2 1 1

Group (School Paper) Contest 20 pts.

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th National Level 20 19 18 17 1 6 15 14 Regional Level 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 Division Level 6 5 4 3 3 2 2 Scriptwriting and Radio Broadcasting 10 pts.

Individual Awards 1st 2nd 3rd National Level 10 9 8 Regional Level 7 6 5 Division Level 4 3 2



35

Group Awards 1st 2nd 3rd National Level 10 9 8 Regional Level 7 6 5 Division Level 4 3 2

Collaborative Publishing 5 points

Individual Awards 1st 2nd 3rd National Level 5 4 3 Regional Level 4 3 2 Division Level 3 2 1

Group Awards 1st 2nd 3rd National Level 5 4 3 Regional Level 4 3 2 Division Level 3 2 1

*In the event that there are several wins, the highest rank shall be considered.

A. Achievement in the Search for Outstanding Campus Paper Adviser and Campus Journalist for the past three years (20 points)

Outstanding Campus Paper Adviser 1st 2nd 3rd National Level 10 9 8 Regional Level 7 6 5 Division Level 4 3 2

Outstanding Campus Journalist

1st 2nd 3rd National Level 10 9 8 Regional Level 7 6 5 Division Level 4 3 2

B. Campus journalism related trainings, remediation and intervention program

implemented (20 points) (One point for each documented training, remediation or intervention program initiated. In the event there are several implemented trainings and programs, 10 will be the maximum point.)

C. School-initiated Published Reading Materials and Articles Related to Journalism (5

points) Books/Modules on Journalism 5 pts.

Articles 2 pts. TOTAL (100 points)

NOTE: ALL DOCUMENTS/CLAIMS SHOULD BE BACKED UP BY DOCUMENTS/CERTIFICATIONS DULY SIGNED BY THE CONCERNED AUTHORITIES.



36

12. MOST EFFECTIVE ACTION RESEARCH

Action Research should have been started and continuously implemented in the school

for the last two years.

The proponent should submit the description of the action research including its

significance and scope.

ACTION RESEARCH EVALUATION RUBRIC: The following criteria will be used for screening the

paper and for judging/evaluating the Best Paper (85%)

CRITERIA (%) INDICATORS RATING

Excellent Good Fair

Clear Focus (20%) The research topic is clear

It is relevant to the current situation

It is clearly introduced at the beginning of the paper

The body of the paper and its conclusion are clearly related to the topic

All the 4 indicators (20 pts)

Only 2-3 indicators (18 pts)

Only 1 indicator (15 pts)

Research (25%) The research design used is appropriate based on the research problem

The paper contains enough information to back up its ideas

The research question was addressed

Extensive data analysis is evident

There are enough sources of information

The sources are reliable

They are recent

They are varied and balanced especially on controversial issues

When appropriate, the paper used different types of resources such as books, journals, newspapers, interviews, or the internet

All the 9 indicators (25 pts)





37

CRITERIA (%) INDICATORS RATING

Excellent Good Fair

Reasoning and organization (25%)

The key concepts are defined and presented in a clear way

The papers argument follow a logical outline

The parts of the paper are coherent

They are logically connected

The information is presented clearly

When appropriate, the paper used related statistics, tables, and/or graphs which are properly labelled

The author introduced every quotation and cited its source properly

All the 7 indicators (25%)


Only 103 indicators (20 pts)

Documentation (15%) The information documented in the body of the paper

The sources were cited using the APA style

Complete and proper referencing was evident

The literature review identified the gap that will be addressed by the research

All of the indicators (15 pts)



Writing Mechanics (15%)

The paper is free of grammatical errors

It is free from spelling and typographical errors

The sentences are brief but precise and free of unnecessary jargon

The paper adhered to the prescribed format

All of the 4 indicators (15 pts)





38

Action Research Case Study Presentation Rubric: The following criteria will be used for evaluating the oral presentation, which is worth a total of 15 points: Presentation will be 5 minutes long. Using the Powerpoint, each nominee will bring his own laptop and USB (if needed) for the presentation.

Criteria (%) Exemplary Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

Organization (10) pts

Clear, well-sequenced progression of ideas. All key points were developed in the appropriate section of the presentation.

Good progression of ideas. Key points were developed in a generally well-sequenced manner, with one or two exceptions.

Ideas may have been good, but was not presented in a logical sequence and organization.

Delivery of Presentation (5) pts

Appropriate presentation media were used; Presentation was effective and audience friendly, including large, readable fonts; use of key words (avoiding too much text), and graphs or other graphics, if appropriate.

Appropriate presentation media were used; Presentation was effective and audience friendly, with one or two exceptions.

Appropriate presentation media were not used and/or presentation was not effective and audience friendly, including large, readable fonts; use of key words (avoiding too much text), and graphs or other graphics, if appropriate.

13. MOST EFFECTIVE BRIGADA ESKWELA IMPLEMENTERS (For the last three years: SY 2011-2012, 2012-2013)

This category will give recognition to the consistent winners in the Search for Best

BrigadaEskwela Implementers for the last three years. Ranking of the winners in each category will be given the following corresponding points and will be summed up to determine the Most Effective DivisionBrigadaEskwela Implementer Awardees:

First Place - 10 points Second Place - 8 points Third Place - 6 points Fourth Place - 4 points Fifth Place - 2 points