gawad primary coops 2015

MOST OUTSTANDING COOPERATIVES

With complete reportorial requirementssubmitted on time (for the year 2014; submittedon or before April 30, 2015) (MOV: stamp receivedby the Regional Offices)

With at least Very Satisfactory Ratings in bothSocial and Performance Audit Reports forMedium and Large category. With at leastSatisfactory ratings in both social andPerformance Audit Reports for Micro and SmallCategory;

Must be in Good Standing for the three (3)preceding years; (MOV: CGS 2012, 2013 & 2014)

QUALIFYING CRITERIA

QUALIFYING CRITERIA Must be operationally gainful:

• for Medium/Large Cooperative -three (3) years and -- (MOV: AFS2012, 2013 & 2014)

• for micro and small cooperative -two (2) years --(MOV: AFS 2013 &2014)

QUALIFYING CRITERIA

•No major findings during the inspection as reported(MOV: Certification from the Regional Office that thecooperative has no major findings based on the result ofinspection, such as No allocation of Net Surplus; Noelection; No regular GA; No Coop Development Plan &Annual Budget approved by the GA; no infraction amongthe BOD, court cases involving the cooperative such astax court, labor court & trial court filed in CY2014 orearlier where the cooperative is the respondent. (note: torefer to the Code and the Bylaws for the violations)

QUALIFYING CRITERIA

Must have a NETWORTH of:

Micro Scale Category Up to Php1,500,000

Small Scale Category 1,500,001 to 7,500,000

Medium Scale Category

7,500,001 Million to 50,000,000

Large Scale Category Above 50,000,000

QUALIFYING CRITERIA

Networth shall be determined based on thefollowing computation: NETWORTH = ASSETS– LIABILITIESLiabilities, under this criteria, shall mean the sumtotal of all the liabilities of the cooperativeincluding deposit liabilities. (only for GawadParangal purposes only)

Documents to be supplied by the CDA EO:

1. Latest Articles of Cooperation and By-Laws;2. Cooperative Annual Performance Report (CAPR) duly

received by the CDA -2012-2014;3. Performance Audit Report 20144. Social Audit Report 2014

DOCUMENTARY REQUIREMENTS

Documents to be supplied by the Co-op:1. Certificate of Good Standing (CGS) for regular purpose (2012-

2014)2. Cooperative Development plan (medium term and annual plan &

budget)3. Audited Financial Statements (AFS) (2012, 2013 & 2014) including

(Notes to FS and Supporting Schedules)• Summary of Aging of Receivables• Summary of Loan Releases (for credit coops and other coops

with lending operations)• Non-Earning Assets• Investments• Liquid Assets

4. List of Training Attended by Cooperative Officers (2012-2014)5. List of Trainings conducted/sponsored by the cooperative (Years

2012, 2013 & 2014);


Documents to be supplied by the Co-op:6. Certification signed by the Chairman and/or General Manager on

the following:• Total Number of Members (Regular and Associate)• Number of members contributing to share capital and the

Annual Increase in the amount of share capital from 2012-2014;(base year is 2012)

• Number of members placing savings/time deposits to co-op andthe Annual increase in the amount of deposits; (2012-2014)

• Dates of meetings of the board of directors for 2014;• Dates of meeting of the different committees for 2014;• Names of Board of Directors, Committees, and Core

management team indicating their respective sex• Names of volunteers, if any, including the specific work

assignment


Documents to be supplied by the Co-op:

6. Certification signed by the Chairman and/or General Manageron the following:

• List of Trainings conducted/sponsored by the cooperative for2014

• List of Existing policies and procedures (i.e. title of the policy)and date approved

• Computation of the rate of interest on Share Capital (ISC) andPatronage Refund (PR). Only the computation on how thecooperative arrived at the rate of ISC and PR, not the individualmembers’ record of ISC and PR should be submitted.


7. Proof/ Evidence of the following (undertaken in 2014)i. Programs that benefitted the members (e.g. provident

services)ii. Support services extended to other cooperativesiii. Social and community activities initiated and/or

participated by the cooperatives (i.e. pictures withcaption) such as but not limited to the following health,medical mission, campaign against drug andenvironmental concerns (e.g. resource conservation,proper waste management, health and safety, etc)

iv. Participation in Coop Month Celebration, Coop Summit,Local Government programs/activities, etc

v. Activities participated/initiated by the coop for thefollowing sectoral groups: youth, women, PWD andothers



8. Certificate or proof of accreditation of LGU and other governingbodies in Local Development Council/committees(if any)

9. List of Awards/Recognitions received by the cooperativeincluding the sponsor of the awards and the year received(Provincial/City/ Regional/National/International levels) forthe past 3 years

10. Current Business Permit/License

EVALUATION/JUDGING CRITERIA

CRITERIA WEIGHT/PTS

Organization, Leadership and Management

39

Financial Mgt. and Business Operation

35

Social Relevance 20

Awards and Recognition 6

TOTAL 100

I. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT (39)

Criteria Formula PointsEquivalent Rating Max

RatingMi S Md L

1. PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT (PAR)

See PAR PART ITotal score/100 x 22

22 22 22 22 22 22

2. Years of Existence • 5 years & below

• Above 5 years

2 1

2

1

2

1

2

1

2

2


Criter5ia Formula Points

Equivalent Rating MaxRatingMi S Md L

3. Membership

a. Total numberof members

5.0 5.0

Large • Above 50,000• 35,001-50,000 • 20,001-35,000• 5,001-20,000• 500 – 5,000• Below 500

5.04.03.02.01.00.0

5.04.03.02.01.00.0

Medium • Above 5,000• 4,001-5,000• 3,001- 4,000• 2,001-3,000 • 200 - 2,000 • Below 200

5.04.03.02.01.00.0

5.04.03.02.01.00.0


RatingMi S Md L

Small • Above 500 • 401 – 500• 301 – 400• 201 -300• 101- 200 • Below 100

5.04.03.02.01.00.0

5.04.03.02.01.00.0

Micro • Above 150 • 76-150• 51-75 • 31-50 • 16-30 • 15

5.04.03.02.01.00.0

5.04.03.02.01.00.0

I. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT (39)


RatingMi S Md L

b. Growth in Membership

Total no. of REGULAR members, End – total no. of REGULAR

members, Beg.---------------------- x 100%

Total no. of REGULAR Members, Beg,

3

• above 30% • 5% - 30%• Below 5%• No increase

3.02.01.00.0

3.02.01.00.0

3.02.01.00.0

3.02.01.00.0

3.02.01.00.0

c. Coop Devt. plan

• With target in the devtplan and w/ increase

• With target but no increase

2

0

2

0

2

0

2

0

2

0

2



RatingMi S Md L

4. Training

a. Compliance to mandatorytrainings

Attendance to the mandatory cooperative training for officers

3

POINT SYSTEM(EQUAL)At least 60% ofthe required training was complied by the majority of the officerse.g. BOD – 6 out of 9 trainings were attended by majority of the BOD

BOD ManagerMandatory Committees :• Audit• Election• Ethics• Mediation &

ConciliationTreasurer Secretary

3

.5

.5

.25

.25

.25

.25.5.5

.5

.5

.25

.25

.25

.25.5.5

.5

.5

.25

.25

.25

.25.5.5

.5

.5

.25

.25

.25

.25.5.5

I. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT (39)

I. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT &MANAGEMENT (39)


RatingMi S Md L

4. Training

b. Trainings Conducted/ facilitated by cooperatives except PMES & Mandatory Trainings Within the period under review

• 5 and above training• 3-4 training• 2 Training • 1 training • No training

2

210

210

210

210

2

SUB-TOTAL 39

II. Financial Management and Business Operation (35)


RatingMi S Md L

1. PISO PAR Part IITotal score/100 x 30

30 30 30 30 30 30

2. Delinquency Rate

(using PAR)

Past Due Loans /Accounts + Loans/Accounts under

Litigation)-----------------------------------

Total Loans & Accounts Outstanding

5 5

• 10% and below• 11% to 30%• Above 30%

5.03.00.0

5.03.00.0

5.03.00.0

5.03.00.0

5.03.00.0

SUB-TOTAL 35

III. SOCIAL RELEVANCE (20)

Criteria Formula/Indicators Points

Equivalent Rating MaxRating

Mi S Md L

III. SOCIAL RELEVANCE

1. SOCIAL AUDIT REPORT (SAR)

See Part IV, V, & VITotal score/40 x 14% x 100

14 14 14 14 14 14

2. Programs / Activities that benefitted itsmembers

• 4 or more programs/ activities

• 3 programs/activities• 2programs/activities• 1 program/activity

2

221

210

2

10

2

3. Direct EmploymentGeneration

• 10 and above employees• 7-9 employees• 4-6 employees• 3 employees• 2 employees

2

21

21

210

210

2


RatingM S Md L

4. Gender and Development

a. Presence of any of the ff.:

• GAD Focal Person• GAD Committee• GAD Budget; • GAD program; • GAD implementation

1 1 1 1 1 1

b. Presence of male and female in the BOD, Committees andManagement Staff

YesNo

1

10

10

10

10

1

Sub-total 20

III. SOCIAL RELEVANCE (20)

IV. AWARDS AND RECOGNITION (6)


RatingM S Md L

Recognition/Citation

received

Awards and recognition received for the past three (3) years (Citation for exemplary performance e.g. competition/search)

5 6

• International Awards received (including ISO Certification)

• Local Awards received National Award

• Awardee• Nominee

Regional Award (Provincial, City, Mun., Barangay, Purok)

312

312

1

311

1

311

SUB-TOTAL 6

GRAND TOTAL 100

gawad primary coops 2015

Business

cooperative years

small cooperative

cooperative officers

mediumlarge cooperative

qualifying criteria

small category

medium scale category

small scale category