figure 1. hiv and syphilis co-morbidity, 2000 – 2009 *diagnosed within 2000 – 2009

10
12% 11% 15% 29% 23% 28% 32% 31% 32% 24% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Year ofTES diagnosis PercentHIV positive 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Num berofTES diagnoses P ercent of TES cases that w ere H IV positive N um berof TES cases diagnosed Figure 1. HIV and syphilis co-morbidity, 2000 – 2009 *diagnosed within 2000 – 2009

Upload: noel-ford

Post on 19-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Figure 1. HIV and syphilis co-morbidity, 2000 – 2009 *diagnosed within 2000 – 2009

12%

11% 15

%

29%

23% 28

% 32%

31%

32%

24%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Year of TES diagnosis

Per

cen

t H

IV p

osi

tive

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Nu

mb

er of T

ES

diag

no

ses

Percent of TES cases that were HIV positive Number of TES cases diagnosed

Figure 1. HIV and syphilis co-morbidity, 2000 – 2009

*diagnosed within 2000 – 2009

Page 2: Figure 1. HIV and syphilis co-morbidity, 2000 – 2009 *diagnosed within 2000 – 2009

349 cases, 6.23

443 cases, 8.03

463 cases, 7.39

4

4.5

5

5.5

6

6.5

7

7.5

8

8.5

2007 2008 2009

Year

Rela

tive

risk

Figure 2. Relative risk* of TES syphilis morbidity by sex, 2007 – 2009

Of the 1,369 interviews conducted during this time, 36% were

identified as MSM.

*Reference is female.

Page 3: Figure 1. HIV and syphilis co-morbidity, 2000 – 2009 *diagnosed within 2000 – 2009

Figure 3. Relative risk* of TES syphilis infection among racial and ethnic minorities, 2007 – 2009

9.64 9.80

Black (non-Hispanic)225 cases, 5.46

38 cases, 2.7024 cases, 2.06

Hispanic28 cases, 2.10

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

2007 2008 2009

Year

Rela

tive

risk

*Reference is white (non-Hispanic).

Page 4: Figure 1. HIV and syphilis co-morbidity, 2000 – 2009 *diagnosed within 2000 – 2009

Figure 4. Relative risk* of TES syphilis infection by age, 2007 – 2009

Age 15-1932 cases , 0.58

42 cases , 0.79

51 cases , 1.13

Age 20-29130 cases , 1.16

202 cases , 1.84

238 cases , 2.57

Age 40-4997 cases , 0.80

97 cases , 0.83

108 cases , 1.08

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

2007 2008 2009

Year

Rela

tive

risk

*Reference is 30-39.

Page 5: Figure 1. HIV and syphilis co-morbidity, 2000 – 2009 *diagnosed within 2000 – 2009

Figure 5. TES syphilis morbidity by region, 2007 – 2009

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200Ce

ntra

l

East

ern

Nor

ther

n

Nor

thw

est

Sout

hwes

t

Cent

ral

East

ern

Nor

ther

n

Nor

thw

est

Sout

hwes

t

Cent

ral

East

ern

Nor

ther

n

Nor

thw

est

Sout

hwes

t

2007 2008 2009

Region

Mor

bidi

ty

Page 6: Figure 1. HIV and syphilis co-morbidity, 2000 – 2009 *diagnosed within 2000 – 2009
Page 7: Figure 1. HIV and syphilis co-morbidity, 2000 – 2009 *diagnosed within 2000 – 2009

Internet Partner Services (IPS)

Since 2-25-05, there have been 248 internet partners named:

219 were unable to locate12 were located and refused examination7 were epi treated0 were brought to treatment2 were closed as "Other"

data thru May 2010

Page 8: Figure 1. HIV and syphilis co-morbidity, 2000 – 2009 *diagnosed within 2000 – 2009

Two Different Syphilis Outbreaks, Two Different Responses, Same Outcome

Page 9: Figure 1. HIV and syphilis co-morbidity, 2000 – 2009 *diagnosed within 2000 – 2009

Syphilis Outbreak Response Cost Comparison

Cost* Duration

Danville ‘00 $ 279,070 12 months

Lynchburg ‘07 $ 34,300 2 months

Cities are similar in size, location, and population dynamicsBoth have previous histories of syphilis outbreaksOnly difference is WHEN the response effort occurred

*Costs include salary, travel related, supplies, and contracts

Page 10: Figure 1. HIV and syphilis co-morbidity, 2000 – 2009 *diagnosed within 2000 – 2009

Issues

SuccessesCan deploy DIS rapidlyRate of increase slowingMonthly webinar for LHD staffCBO partnerships

ChallengesTimeliness of disease interventionIPS – low Tx yieldTraining needsHIV co-infectionDIS resourcesMedia campaign approval