ecml20140218

36
A Case Study: Implementation of EPOSTL in Teaching Practice for Foreign Language Activities Takenori YAMAMOTO EPOSTL Conference 18 February, 2014 at European Centre for Modern Languages

Upload: yamamoto-takenori

Post on 22-May-2015

166 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation at ECML conference "Crossing Continent: EPOSTL around the World"

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ECML20140218

A Case Study: Implementation of EPOSTL in Teaching Practice for

Foreign Language Activities

Takenori YAMAMOTO

EPOSTL Conference 18 February, 2014 at European Centre for Modern Languages

Page 2: ECML20140218

Background

Page 3: ECML20140218

1992~

2000~

2011~

2020~

Pilot Study

Educational Area (Selective)

Educational Area (Compulsory)

Compulsory Subject

History of Foreign Language Activities

Page 4: ECML20140218

21 National Universities (in 2010) and more

Page 5: ECML20140218

Adaptation of EPOSTL

Page 6: ECML20140218

EPOSTL J-POSTLJACET SIG (2010)

Page 7: ECML20140218

Adaption of J-POSTL to Foreign Language Activities

Page 8: ECML20140218

Purpose

Page 9: ECML20140218

to adapt/implement EPOSTL (J-POSTL) into Foreign Language Activities !

to find out the participants’ learning during teaching practice

Page 10: ECML20140218

Questions to be solved

• Which J-POSTL descriptors are appropriate for Foreign Language Activities?

!

• How do the selected descriptors effect student teachers’ learning in teacher education for Foreign Language Activities?

Page 11: ECML20140218

Design

Page 12: ECML20140218

Selecting descriptors from J-POSLT through

discussion

Conducting survey in order

to check appropriateness

of selected descriptors

Implementing descriptors &

conducting interview

Page 13: ECML20140218

Selecting descriptors from J-POSLT through

discussion

•Changing words (students→pupils)

•Discussion “Which descriptors are needed especially for teachers of Foreign Language Activities?” by two graduate students and the researcher

Page 14: ECML20140218

Conducting survey in order

to check appropriateness

of selected descriptors

•Survey 1 “not appropriate” ~

4 “very appropriate” !Subjects two elementary school teachers two university teachers !one sample t-test H0: μ=3

Page 15: ECML20140218

Implementing descriptors &

conducting interview

•Implementing&interview During teaching practice

Before teaching practice

understanding descriptors 1st evaluation

!During teaching practice

2nd evaluation interview

!After teaching practice

3rd evaluation interview

Page 16: ECML20140218

Implementing descriptors &

conducting interview

!Interview !

“What did you do in teaching practice?”

“Why did your evaluation change?”

“How do you think about using descriptors?”

Page 17: ECML20140218

Results

Page 18: ECML20140218

Selecting descriptors from J-POSLT through discussion

47 descriptors were selected •I can understand the personal, intellectual and cultural value of learning other languages

•I can locate and select listening and reading materials appropriate for the needs of my learners from a variety of sources, such as literature, mass media and the Internet

Page 19: ECML20140218

Selecting descriptors from J-POSLT through discussion

continued... •I can plan lessons and periods of teaching with other teachers and/or student teachers (team teaching, with other subject teachers etc.)

•I can decide when it is appropriate to use the target language and when not to.

Page 20: ECML20140218

Selecting descriptors from J-POSLT through discussion

Removed descriptors… •I can evaluate and select texts in a variety of text types to function as good examples for the learner’s writing

•I can recommend dictionaries and other reference books useful for my learners.

Page 21: ECML20140218

Conducting survey in order to check appropriateness of selected descriptors

All 47 descriptors were evaluated as appropriate statistically

Page 22: ECML20140218

Conducting survey in order to check appropriateness of selected descriptors

statistic shows... •25 descriptors were significantly evaluated as “appropriate”.

•10 descriptors were evaluated as “appropriate” (SD=0)

•12 descriptors’ effect size showed that these descriptors were “appropriate”

Page 23: ECML20140218

Implementing descriptors & conducting interview

Page 24: ECML20140218

Implementing descriptors & conducting interview

Page 25: ECML20140218

Transcription of interview (student B) •A lot of the evaluation (of the descriptors) become lower because I felt I lost confidence (through teaching practice). I could not do what I wanted to do. I could not use any skills and knowledge I learnt in university

Implementing descriptors & conducting interview

Page 26: ECML20140218

Transcription of interview (student B) •I felt confused with the difference between what I learnt in university and what I am learning during teaching practice. For example, university teachers taught me to do classes only in English. But my mentor told me choose English or Japanese based on pupils’ comprehension.

Implementing descriptors & conducting interview

Page 27: ECML20140218

Transcription of interview (student A) •I think that the evaluation of some descriptors went up because I could do them in my first lesson. Additionally, I failed to do some descriptors before, but I reflected my failure on my lesson plan. So now I feel “I can do them”

Implementing descriptors & conducting interview

Page 28: ECML20140218

Transcription of interview (student A) •There are some descriptors which do not relate to my experience in teaching practice. But I think it is very good for me. I can tell clearly what I know from what I don’t know. Then I want to learn what I don’t know through university lectures or research studies.

Implementing descriptors & conducting interview

Page 29: ECML20140218

Implementing descriptors & conducting interview

finding gaps of experience at

school and uni

finding connections of experience at

school and uni

finding skills/knowledge

students don’t know

enhancing further learning

strengthening confidence

needs for new learning at uni

Page 30: ECML20140218

Implementing descriptors & conducting interview

requiring a lot of time to understand & evaluate

descriptors

Page 31: ECML20140218

Discussion

Page 32: ECML20140218

Questions to be solved• Which J-POSTL descriptors are appropriate

for Foreign Language Activities?

• How do selected descriptors effect students’ learning in teacher education for Foreign Language Activities?

Page 33: ECML20140218

Questions to be solved• Which J-POSTL descriptors are appropriate

for Foreign Language Activities?

47 descriptors from J-POSTL

Page 34: ECML20140218

Questions to be solved• How do selected descriptors effect students’

learning in teacher education for Foreign Language Activities?

further learning

confidence

new learning at uni

Development as teachers of Foreign

Language Activities

Page 35: ECML20140218

Research during the whole period of pre-service teacher education

Research with large number of participants & different universities

Page 36: ECML20140218

Thank you