dna training day 2 0930 sp patrick horka role and responsibilities of cme
DESCRIPTION
Roles & Responsibilities of Coordinating Managing Entity (CME) in Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Programme of Activities (PoA) for carbon asset management solutionsTRANSCRIPT
The role and responsibility of the Coordinating and Managing Entity (CME)
Presented by Patrick Horka, Head of PoAs, South Pole Carbon [email protected] 21 March 2012
2
Content
• PPs/CMEs expectations in PoAs
• CMEs roles and responsibilities
• Possible CME operational models
• Practical solutions to cover carbon aspects
• South Pole’s contribution to a successful PoA
3
Thanks to PoA the minimum CDM size limit can be lowered
4
Goal of PoAs Making carbon revenues bankable
• Reduced non-registration risk of CPAs • Inclusion of new CPA within 2-5 months (if well designed PoA), possible before
financial closure • If sound monitoring and effective verfication is ensured, very low non-delivery risk
of CERs. Risks similar to obtaining power revenues
Year -‐2 -‐1 1 2 3 4 5 Year -‐2 -‐1 1 2 3 4 5
Carbon finance
Cash inflow
Cash outflow
Cash inflow
Debt
Equity
Investment & construction expenditure
Debt servicingOperating expenditure
Operating revenues Operating revenues
Investment & construction expenditure
Debt servicing
Cash outflow Operating expenditure
CER revenues
Equity
Debt
??? CER revenues ???
Carbon revenues become bankable!
5
What can be expected from PoAs?
• Geographical and sectoral redistribution (towards LDCs and EE (low density)) • Economy of scale/Lowered transaction costs • Lowered registration and issuance risks • Scalable carbon finance mechanism • Lower time to market These evolutions shall result in : • Translating “carbon revenues“ into “carbon finance“ • Linking policies and ER
6
Content
• PPs/CMEs expectations in PoAs
• CMEs roles and responsibilities
• Possible CME operational models
• Practical solutions to cover carbon aspects
• South Pole’s contribution to a successful PoA
Typical PoA structure
UNFCCC
DOE
DNA
PoA Coordinating Entity
CPA developers
Contracts Administration
PoA design Promotion
Financial management Monitoring
CER buyer
Finacial institutions Technology provider
8
CMEs layers of roles and responsibilities
1. Carbon aspects
2. Finance
3. Technology
4. Project management/product commercialization
Excellent coverage of all Carbon aspects required for all type of PoAs and, basis for an overall success!
9
1. Carbon aspects
• Carbon specific due diligence of potential CPAs • Liaise with DOEs and include CPAs • Introduce an efficient and reliable monitoring system • Monitoring data management • PoA verification • Commercialize CERs • Ability to manage all CER flows:
– Cede carbon rights – Introduction of solid incentive schemes – Track generation of emission reduction – Manage ERPAs
1. Carbon aspects
2. Finance
3. Technology
4. Project management/product commercialization
10
2/3/4. Finance/Technology/Project mgt./Product commercialization
• Finance: – Provide carbon prepayments – Support equity investment
• Technology: – Knowledge of sector and user habits – Technology with USP over PoA crediting period
• Project mgt./Product commercialization: – Logistics – Distribution network down to the end-user – Marketing – Manage financial flows back to the CME
1. Carbon aspects
2. Finance
3. Technology
4. Project management/product commercialization
11
Content
• PPs/CMEs expectations in PoAs
• CMEs roles and responsibilities
• Possible CME operational models
• Practical solutions to cover carbon aspects
• South Pole’s contribution to a successful PoA
12
Possible operational models for implementing a PoA
13
Some Coordinating Entity model : the government based PoA
Government owned and operated PoA : • Set-up and manage PoA • PoA supports its policies Advantage/Disadvantage : • PoA gets a monopolistic position • PoA cannot be transboundary Challenge : • Government needs to be familiar and
efficient with UNFCCC procedures
14
Some Coordinating Entity model : the government concession
Government concession: • PoA supports its policies • Operation of the PoA is sub-contracted Advantage/Disadvantage : • PoA gets a monopolistic position • PoA cannot be transboundary • Operator can be a carbon professional
15
Some Coordinating Entity model : the private PoA
Private PoA: • PoA supports a measure or a technology • Coordinating entity provides at minimum
CDM and monitoring services • Coordinating entity can provide
eventually technical and investment solutions.
Advantage/Disadvantage : • PoA does not get a monopolistic position • PoA can be transboundary • Act as an „open“ PoA
16
Content
• PPs/CMEs expectations in PoAs
• CMEs roles and responsibilities
• Possible CME operational models
• Practical solutions to cover carbon aspects
• South Pole’s contribution to a successful PoA
17
Practical solutions to cover all carbon aspects!
1. A project management tool (PMT): – Track CPAs and keep PoA overview – Define responsibilities – Allow communication flow between team members – Overview CPA milestone targets – QC/QA system – Manage CERs, allocate to buyers, transfer to CPA implementer – Portfolio management
2. Automated Monitoring and Verification Systems (MOVERs) – Automatic collection and tamper proof transmission of data. – Interface for DOEs, credit buyers and POs to access the data in real
time to conduct consistency checks – Data aggregation and archival across a potentially large number of
CPAs
18
South Pole’s “PMT”: PoA overview
High level PoA management for CME management!
19
South Pole’s “PMT”: PoA vintages overview
20
South Pole’s “PMT”: CPA milestones overview
21
South Pole’s “PMT”: CPA QC/QA
22
Sout Pole’s PMT: Monitoring mgt. example
Collects data from the
project site
Prepares monthlyreports forthe CME
Collectsmonthly
reports and relevant
information
Stores datainto PMT and develops PoA MonitoringReport
QA/QC of the PoA MonitoringReport
Provides / recievesCDM-‐relatedfeedbak to the
CPA Implementeras needed
CPA Implementer
CME
SouthPole
Technical staff
Operational staff
Management
RR
A I
C
C
CPA Manager R R
R RProject Manager
Supervisor A
APoA Manager (CPA Supervisor)
I
R
Quality Manager C
I
Local Responsible forData Management I I
23
South Pole’s “MOVERs”: Example China micro hydro
MOVERs developed in China: • GSM based technology using common industrial standard (RS485) • Hardware set-up is very simple cheap (ca. 100 EUR per meter)
24
South Pole’s “MOVERs”: Example China micro hydro (continued)
Electricity meter at Suzhou also configured to send data to PMT
25
South Pole’s “MOVERs”: PMT interface
MOVERs PMT interface developed for first pilot project (CYY)
26
South Pole’s “MOVERs”: Application opportunities
• Fixed installed meters (e.g micro hydro): – Direct transfer of data via GSM – Real time data control – Direct actions on CPAs with data “out of bound”
• No meters, manual data collection (e.g. water purification): – Technical local staff to collect data on hard copy (e.g. water
device user information) – Local responsible for data mgt. to archive hard copy and
electronically submit data on regular basis – Almost real time data control – Centralized data verification and intervention option – Tracking of distribution and/or monitoring progress – To do: Direct data feeding via text messaging and
transmission via mobile phones
27
Take away message
Each CMEs faces their very specific challenges BUT all CMEs need a deep carbon management expertise, internally or via a partner, to achieve the continuous issuance of CERs!
1. Carbon aspects
2. Finance
3. Technology
4. Project management/product commercialization
28
Content
• PPs/CMEs expectations in PoAs
• CMEs roles and responsibilities
• Possible CME operational models
• Practical solutions for to cover carbon aspects
• South Pole’s contribution to a successful PoA
29
South Pole provides the whole range of carbon asset management solutions
29
PoA relevant today
PoA relevant today
PoA relevant today
PoA relevant
tomorrow
30
South Pole is proactively shaping the PoA market and conciously takes the risk of an early mover
• Two PoAs under implementation as a Public Private Partnership (together with GTZ) PPPs
Own development
• Own development of 8 private sector PoAs, 1 registered, 7 in final validation stage
• First successfully validate VCU grouped project
• South Pole is developing first fully integrated, web based management system to manage PoAs
• More than 20 finalized and ongoing consulting mandates in the space of PoAs
• First mandate to take over carbon mgt. tasks on behalf of al CME
Consulting
World wide presence, allowing best support for own but also external PoAs
Johannesburg
Zurich
Jakarta
Bangkok
Taipei
Beijing
Mexico City
• 2006: Incorporation in Zurich / Switzerland
• 2011: ten offices worldwide
• 2011: Best Project Developer*
• Swiss Social Entrepreneur of the Year 2011**
• Over 80 carbon pros from 22 countries
• Projects in over twenty countries
• Specialized in high-quality “Gold Standard”
California
Local presence
as of January 2012
Hanoi New Delhi
Medellin
Satellite office Head office
* Environmental Finance: Voluntary Carbon Market Survey 2011; ** Schwab Foundation/WEF
Kampala