community data snapshot crystal lake, municipality …lak… · community data snapshot: crystal...

COMMUNITY DATA SNAPSHOTCRYSTAL LAKE, MUNICIPALITYJUNE 2020 RELEASE

About The Community Data Snapshot 1

About The Community Data SnapshotThe Community Data Snapshots are a series of county, municipal, and Chicago Community Area data profiles thatprimarily feature data from the 2014-2018 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates. As noted in eachprofile, the data comes from multiple sources in addition to the ACS, which include U.S. Census Bureau, IllinoisEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA), Illinois Department of Employment Security (IDES), Illinois Department ofRevenue (IDR), and the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP).

User NotesMargin of error

ACS is a sample-based data product. Exercise caution when using data from low-population municipalities, as themargins of error are often large compared to the estimate. For more details please refer to the ACS Sample Size andData Quality Methodology.

Regional values

Regional values are estimated by aggregating 2014-2018 ACS county level data of the seven counties that make upthe CMAP region. These counties are Cook, DuPage, Kane, Kendall, Lake, McHenry, and Will.

Median values

The Census Bureau encourages users to aggregate small levels of geographies into larger areas and recalculatemedian values for those aggregated areas. Median values are recalculated using grouped frequency distributions foraggregated areas such as the CMAP region.

Values for municipalities that extend outside the CMAP region

Values derived from CMAP analyses are restricted to geographies that fall within the CMAP regional boundaries.General Land Use, Equalized Assesed Value, Park Access, Water Supply, and ON TO 2050 Indicator table values onlyrepresent portions of the the municipality that fall within the CMAP region.

Municipalities located in more than one county

Data is provided for the county containing the largest geographic portion of municipality.

Employment values

The Private Sector Employment table features data from the IDES Where Workers Work report. This report includesprivate sector employment totals for six counties within the seven-county CMAP region, excluding Kendall County.

2

https://www.census.gov/acs/www/methodology/sample-size-and-data-quality/

POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLDThe population and household tables include general demographic, social, and economic characteristics summarizedfor Crystal Lake.

GENERAL POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS, 2014-2018

Crystal Lake McHenry County CMAP Region

Total Population 40,170 307,789 8,511,032Total Households 14,701 111,812 3,107,682Average Household Size 2.7 2.8 2.7% Population Change, 2000-10 7.2 18.7 3.5% Population Change, 2010-18 -1.4 -0.3 0.9% Population Change, 2000-18 5.7 18.3 4.5

Source: 2000 and 2010 Census, 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates.

RACE AND ETHNICITY, 2014-2018


Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

White non-Hispanic 32,781 81.6 250,987 81.5 4,367,579 51.3Hispanic or Latino 5,021 12.5 39,326 12.8 1,944,675 22.8Black non-Hispanic 557 1.4 4,160 1.4 1,419,547 16.7Asian non-Hispanic 1,075 2.7 8,300 2.7 603,513 7.1All other categories 736 1.8 5,016 1.6 175,718 2.1

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Total population.

AGE COHORTS, 2014-2018



19 and Under 10,763 26.8 82,270 26.7 2,191,110 25.720 to 34 6,731 16.8 52,425 17.0 1,807,984 21.235 to 49 8,429 21.0 63,297 20.6 1,713,974 20.150 to 64 9,013 22.4 68,351 22.2 1,641,420 19.365 to 74 2,711 6.7 25,771 8.4 669,758 7.975 to 84 1,662 4.1 10,858 3.5 337,105 4.085 and Older 861 2.1 4,817 1.6 149,681 1.8Median Age* 40.1 40.2 37.2

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Total population.

3

Community Data Snapshot: Crystal Lake

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT, 2014-2018



Less than High School Graduate 1,782 6.6 14,873 7.2 684,093 11.9High School Graduate or Equivalency 5,845 21.5 54,107 26.2 1,319,895 22.9Some College, No Degree 5,957 21.9 48,913 23.6 1,110,944 19.3Associate's Degree 2,492 9.2 19,302 9.3 400,050 7.0Bachelor's Degree 7,378 27.2 46,461 22.5 1,352,126 23.5Graduate or Professional Degree 3,704 13.6 23,253 11.2 888,642 15.4

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Population 25 years and older.

NATIVITY, 2014-2018


Count Percent Percent Percent

Native 33,977 90.0 89.9 79.7Foreign Born 3,772 10.0 10.1 20.3


LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME AND ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH, 2014-2018



English Only 33,012 87.5 249,043 85.6 5,489,328 68.7Language other than English 4,737 12.5 41,787 14.4 2,495,708 31.3Speak English less than "very well" 1,677 4.4 14,784 5.1 960,908 12.0


LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME, 2014-2018



English 33,012 87.5 249,043 85.6 5,489,328 68.7Spanish 3,090 8.2 26,061 9.0 1,466,849 18.4Slavic Languages 432 1.1 5,781 2.0 275,150 3.4Chinese 84 0.2 481 0.2 90,366 1.1Tagalog 109 0.3 1,186 0.4 74,092 0.9Arabic 0 0.0 386 0.1 61,835 0.8Korean 43 0.1 536 0.2 36,409 0.5Other Asian Languages 384 1.0 1,739 0.6 104,636 1.3Other Indo-European Languages 534 1.4 5,164 1.8 331,350 4.1Other / Unspecified Languages 61 0.2 453 0.2 55,021 0.7


4


HOUSEHOLD SIZE, 2014-2018



1 Person Household 3,156 21.5 22,710 20.3 894,230 28.82 People Household 4,504 30.6 38,574 34.5 952,267 30.63 People Household 3,117 21.2 19,459 17.4 486,146 15.64 or More People Household 3,924 26.7 31,069 27.8 775,039 24.9

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Occupied housing units.

HOUSEHOLD TYPE, 2014-2018



Family 10,812 73.5 74.7 65.1Single Parent with Child 1,180 8.0 7.2 8.3

Non-Family 3,889 26.5 25.3 34.9


HOUSEHOLD INCOME, 2014-2018



Less than $25,000 1,419 9.7 11,828 10.6 551,715 17.8$25,000 to $49,999 2,226 15.1 18,097 16.2 585,464 18.8$50,000 to $74,999 2,430 16.5 19,452 17.4 504,014 16.2$75,000 to $99,999 2,390 16.3 17,112 15.3 390,392 12.6$100,000 to $149,999 3,425 23.3 23,648 21.1 516,533 16.6$150,000 and Over 2,811 19.1 21,675 19.4 559,564 18.0Median Income $87,221 $84,803 $70,444


5


HOUSING AND TENURE, 2014-2018



Occupied Housing Units 14,701 94.8 111,812 94.7 3,107,682 91.4Owner-Occupied* 11,026 71.1 88,631 75.0 1,984,033 58.4Renter-Occupied* 3,675 23.7 23,181 19.6 1,123,649 33.0

Vacant Housing Units 805 5.2 6,320 5.3 292,513 8.6

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: *Occupied housing units; Housing units.

HOUSING COSTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME, 2014-2018*



Less than $20,000 1,001 6.9 6.8 12.0Less than 20 percent 24 0.2 0.2 0.320 to 29 percent 65 0.4 0.4 0.830 percent or more 912 6.3 6.3 10.8

$20,000 to $49,999 2,480 17.1 19.2 23.3Less than 20 percent 177 1.2 2.2 2.620 to 29 percent 491 3.4 4.1 5.130 percent or more 1,812 12.5 12.9 15.6

$50,000 to $74,999 2,410 16.6 17.6 16.5Less than 20 percent 528 3.6 5.1 5.320 to 29 percent 934 6.5 6.1 5.830 percent or more 948 6.5 6.4 5.4

$75,000 or More 8,589 59.3 56.4 48.2Less than 20 percent 5,475 37.8 36.8 31.920 to 29 percent 2,424 16.7 15.3 12.330 percent or more 690 4.8 4.3 4.0

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates.*Excludes households with zero or negative income and no cash rent.

Universe: Occupied housing units.

HOUSING & TRANSPORTATION (H+T) COSTS, PERCENT OF INCOME PER HOUSEHOLD, 2012-2016*

Median-Income Household** Moderate-Income Household***

Housing Costs 34 43Transportation Costs 23 25H + T Costs 57 68

Source: Location Affordability Index, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, and U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development.*The purpose of the H+T Index is to isolate the effect of location on housing and transportation costs, grouped by common demographic characteristicsthat form four distinct household types. The values above represent the percent of household income that an average household within each of thesetypes in the region would spend on housing and transportation if they lived in this county. The standard threshold of affordability is equal to 30 percentfor housing costs and 45 percent for housing and transportation costs combined. For more information, visit hudexchange.**Median-Income Household assumes a household income equal to the area median, with regional average household size, and the regional averagecommuters per household.***Moderate-Income Household assumes a household income of 80% of the area median with regional average household size, and the regional averagecommuters per household.

6

https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/location-affordability-index/


HOUSING CHARACTERISTICSThe housing characteristics tables include housing unit estimates by housing type, size, and age summarized forCrystal Lake.

HOUSING TYPE, 2014-2018*



Single Family, Detached 10,479 67.6 91,230 77.2 1,707,038 50.2Single Family, Attached 1,394 9.0 11,427 9.7 252,166 7.42 Units 417 2.7 2,476 2.1 238,040 7.03 or 4 Units 728 4.7 2,834 2.4 269,766 7.95 or more Units 2,201 14.2 9,238 7.8 906,352 26.7

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates.*Excludes mobile, boat, RV, van, etc.

Universe: Housing units.

HOUSING SIZE, 2014-2018



0 to 1 Bedrooms 975 6.3 6,623 5.6 544,680 16.02 Bedrooms 4,042 26.1 25,461 21.6 967,257 28.43 Bedrooms 4,813 31.0 46,532 39.4 1,132,665 33.34 Bedrooms 4,991 32.2 32,777 27.7 593,229 17.45+ Bedrooms 685 4.4 6,739 5.7 162,364 4.8Median Number of Rooms* 6.7 6.6 6.0

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates.*Includes all rooms.


HOUSING AGE, 2014-2018



Built 2000 or Later 2,106 13.6 27,755 23.5 448,760 13.2Built 1970 to 1999 9,379 60.5 58,336 49.4 1,151,670 33.9Built 1940 to 1969 2,857 18.4 21,835 18.5 1,049,052 30.9Built Before 1940 1,164 7.5 10,206 8.6 750,713 22.1Median Year Built 1985 1987 1968

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Housing units.

7


TRANSPORTATIONThe transportation tables include vehicle availability by household, mode of travel to work, and annual vehicle milestraveled for Crystal Lake.

VEHICLES AVAILABLE PER HOUSEHOLD, 2014-2018



No Vehicle Available 596 4.1 4,073 3.6 394,626 12.71 Vehicle Available 3,769 25.6 26,205 23.4 1,104,851 35.62 Vehicles Available 6,959 47.3 51,131 45.7 1,103,712 35.53 or More Vehicles Available 3,377 23.0 30,403 27.2 504,493 16.2


MODE OF TRAVEL TO WORK, 2014-2018

Crystal Lake McHenry County 6-County Region*


Work at Home** 1,212 N/A 10,327 N/A 214,903 N/ADrive Alone 17,338 86.5 132,102 88.0 2,856,015 72.4Carpool 1,518 7.6 10,729 7.2 323,107 8.2Transit 789 3.9 4,269 2.8 551,089 14.0Walk or Bike 211 1.1 1,599 1.1 163,932 4.2Other 178 0.9 1,333 0.9 51,124 1.3TOTAL COMMUTERS 20,034 100.0 150,032 100.0 3,945,267 100.0Mean Commute Time (minutes) N/A 33.6 31.8

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates.* Commuter estimates not available for Kendall County.** Not included in "total commuters."

Universe: Workers 16 years and older.

ANNUAL VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED PER HOUSEHOLD, 2014-2018


Average Vehicle Miles Traveled 21,052 23,593 17,165

Source: Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning analysis of U.S. Census Bureau, HERE, and Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (2017) data.

8


EMPLOYMENTThe employment tables include general workforce characteristics for Crystal Lake.

EMPLOYMENT STATUS, 2014-2018



In Labor Force 22,494 71.0 171,051 70.3 4,547,626 67.2Employed†* 21,582 95.9 163,471 95.6 4,231,812 93.1Unemployed* 907 4.0 7,565 4.4 304,075 6.7

Not In Labor Force 9,170 29.0 72,112 29.7 2,215,759 32.8

Source: 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates.Does not include employed population in the Armed Forces.†

Universe: *In Labor Force; Population 16 years and older.

PRIVATE SECTOR EMPLOYMENT, 2019*

Crystal Lake McHenry County 6-County Region**


Private Employment 20,910 N/A 80,319 N/A 3,598,232 N/AJob Change (2002-10) -3,321 -15.0 -1,264 -1.7 -225,309 -6.7Job Change (2010-19) 2,134 11.4 5,424 7.2 465,181 14.8Job Change (2002-19) -1,187 -5.4 4,160 5.5 239,872 7.1Private Sector Jobs per Household 1.42 0.72 1.16

Source: Illinois Department of Employment Security (IDES).*Figures exclude employees not covered by unemployment insurance.**Kendall County is not included in IDES data.

EMPLOYMENT OF CRYSTAL LAKE RESIDENTS, 2017*

By Industry Sector Count Percent

Manufacturing 2,340 11.4Education 2,324 11.3Retail Trade 2,295 11.2Health Care 2,059 10.0Wholesale Trade 1,566 7.6

By Employment Location

Crystal Lake 2,965 14.4Chicago 1,970 9.6Elgin 919 4.5McHenry 811 3.9Schaumburg 711 3.5

EMPLOYMENT IN CRYSTAL LAKE, 2017*

By Industry Sector Count Percent

Retail Trade 3,211 16.7Education 2,978 15.5Health Care 2,099 10.9Manufacturing 2,061 10.7Accommodation and FoodService

1,919 10.0

By Residence Location

Crystal Lake 2,965 15.5Lake in the Hills 984 5.1Woodstock 887 4.6McHenry 830 4.3Chicago 693 3.6

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Longitudinal-Employer Household Dynamics Program (2017).*Excludes locations outside of the CMAP region.

9


LAND USEThe land use tables include general land use composition, park access, and Walk Score for Crystal Lake. The generalland use and park access table estimates were derived from the CMAP Parcel-Based Land Use Inventory.

GENERAL LAND USE, 2013

Acres Percent

Single-Family Residential 3,543.3 29.3Multi-Family Residential 164.2 1.4Commercial 876.2 7.3Industrial 669.9 5.5Institutional 700.7 5.8Mixed Use 1.4 0.0Transportation and Other 2,015.7 16.7Agricultural 1,577.4 13.1Open Space 1,642.5 13.6Vacant 882.7 7.3TOTAL 12,073.9 100.0

Source: Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Parcel-Based Land Use Inventory 2013.

PARK ACCESS, 2013


Accessible Park Acreage per 1,000 Residents* 16.7 11.2 5.6

Source: Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning calculations of 2013 Land Use Inventory.*Neighborhood parks (under 35 acres) are considered accessible by residents living within 0.5 miles; community parks (35 or more acres) are consideredaccessible by residents living within 1 mile.

WALK SCORE, 2018

Walk Score* 29.00

*Walk Score is a number between 0 and 100 that measures the average walkability of a municipality. For more information visit walkscore.com (2018).

10

https://www.cmap.illinois.gov/data/land-use/inventory

https://www.walkscore.com


REVENUEThe revenue tables include Crystal Lake revenues based on sales and current land use.

GENERAL MERCHANDISE RETAIL SALES, 2019


General Merchandise $ 992,024,110 $ 3,418,045,199 $ 105,768,000,000Total Retail Sales $ 1,224,192,546 $ 4,321,193,978 $ 133,428,000,000Total Sales per Capita* $ 30,475 $ 14,039 $ 15,677

Source: Illinois Department of Revenue, 2019.*Per capita calculations based on population from 2014-2018 ACS 5-year estimates.

EQUALIZED ASSESSED VALUE, 2018

Residential $ 830,734,889Commercial $ 246,047,143Industrial $ 66,264,371Railroad $ 1,760,154Farm $ 1,761,344Mineral $ 1,465,540TOTAL $ 1,148,033,441

Sources: Illinois Department of Revenue 2018, Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning calculations of 2013 Land UseInventory, 2014-2018 ACS 5-year estimates.

11

Community Data Snapshot Time Series: Crystal Lake

CHANGE OVER TIMEThe time series tables include comparisons of current 2014-2018 ACS estimates to historic year estimates from the2000 Census and 2006-2010 ACS.

RACE AND ETHNICITY, 2000-2018

2000 2010 2018

Percent Percent Percent

White non-Hispanic 89.6 83.7 81.6Hispanic or Latino 7.0 11.2 12.5Black non-Hispanic 0.5 1.8 1.4Asian non-Hispanic 1.9 1.8 2.7All other categories 0.9 1.5 1.8

Source: 2000 Census, 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American CommunitySurvey five-year estimates.

Universe: Total population.

NATIVITY, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

Native 89.5 90.0Foreign Born 10.5 10.0

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-yearestimates.

Universe: Population 5 years and older.

AGE COHORTS, 2000-2018

2000 2010 2018


19 and Under 33.8 32.1 26.820 to 34 17.9 16.9 16.835 to 49 27.2 24.6 21.050 to 64 12.1 16.4 22.465 and Older 9.0 10.1 13.0Median Age* 34.1 35.6 40.1

Source: 2000 Census, 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American CommunitySurvey five-year estimates.

Universe: Total population.

12


EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT, 2000-2018

2000 2010 2018


Less than High School Graduate 8.5 6.8 6.6High School Graduate or Equivalency 22.7 21.7 21.5Some College, No Degree 25.9 24.7 21.9Associate's Degree 6.7 8.0 9.2Bachelor's Degree 25.3 26.3 27.2Graduate or Professional Degree 10.9 12.6 13.6

Source: 2000 Census, 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Population 25 years and older.

LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME AND ABILITY TO SPEAK ENGLISH, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

English Only 85.8 87.5Language other than English 14.2 12.5Speak English less than "very well" 6.6 4.4

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Population 5 years and older.

LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

English 85.8 87.5Spanish 9.2 8.2Slavic Languages 1.5 1.1Chinese 0.0 0.2Tagalog 0.2 0.3Arabic 0.0 0.0Korean 0.2 0.1Other Asian Languages 0.3 1.0Other Indo-European Languages 2.6 1.4Other / Unspecified Languages 0.2 0.2

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Population 5 years and older.

13


HOUSEHOLD SIZE, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

1 Person Household 23.9 21.52 People Household 26.6 30.63 People Household 16.9 21.24 or More People Household 32.6 26.7

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates. Universe: Occupied housing units.

HOUSEHOLD TYPE, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

Family 72.1 73.5Single Parent with Child 7.8 8.0

Non-Family 27.9 26.5


HOUSEHOLD INCOME, 2010-2018

2010 2018

(2018 Dollars) (2018 Dollars)

Median Income $ 86,392 $ 87,221


14


HOUSING AND TENURE, 2010-2018

2000 2010 2018


Occupied Housing Units 97.1 94.5 94.8Owner-Occupied* 77.0 73.8 71.1Renter-Occupied* 20.1 20.7 23.7

Vacant Housing Units 2.9 5.5 5.2

Source: 2000 Census, 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-yearestimates.

Universe: *Occupied housing units; Housing units.

HOUSING COSTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

Less than $20,000 8.7 6.9Less than 20 percent 0.2 0.220 to 29 percent 0.8 0.430 percent or more 7.7 6.3

$20,000 to $49,999 21.8 17.1Less than 20 percent 2.8 1.220 to 29 percent 5.0 3.430 percent or more 14.0 12.5

$50,000 to $74,999 18.7 16.6Less than 20 percent 4.4 3.620 to 29 percent 6.3 6.530 percent or more 8.0 6.5

$75,000 or More 49.9 59.3Less than 20 percent 23.6 37.820 to 29 percent 19.0 16.730 percent or more 7.4 4.8


15


HOUSING TYPE, 2010-2018*

2010 2018

Percent Percent

Single Family, Detached 66.4 67.6Single Family, Attached 10.3 9.02 Units 1.1 2.73 or 4 Units 4.8 4.75 or more Units 14.9 14.2

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-yearestimates.*Excludes mobile, boat, RV, van, etc.


HOUSING SIZE, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

0 to 1 Bedrooms 7.0 6.32 Bedrooms 25.6 26.13 Bedrooms 30.7 31.04 Bedrooms 32.9 32.25+ Bedrooms 3.9 4.4Median Number of Rooms* 6.8 6.7

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates.*Includes all rooms.


HOUSING AGE, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

Built 2000 or Later 10.8 13.6Built 1970 to 1999 59.7 60.5Built 1940 to 1969 19.7 18.4Built Before 1940 9.8 7.5Median Year Built 1983 1985

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-yearestimates.


16


VEHICLES AVAILABLE, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

No Vehicle Available 4.4 4.11 Vehicle Available 27.1 25.62 Vehicles Available 48.3 47.33 or More Vehicles Available 20.2 23.0


MODE OF TRAVEL TO WORK, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

Work at Home* N/A N/ADrive Alone 87.8 86.5Carpool 6.2 7.6Transit 3.4 3.9Walk or Bike 1.7 1.1Other 1.0 0.9TOTAL COMMUTERS 18,695.0 20,034.0Mean Commute Time (minutes) 33.4 N/A

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-yearestimates.* Not included in "total commuters."

Universe: Workers 16 years and over.

EMPLOYMENT STATUS, 2010-2018

2010 2018

Percent Percent

In Labor Force 71.8 71.0Employed†* 92.2 95.9Unemployed* 7.7 4.0

Not In Labor Force 28.2 29.0

Source: 2006-2010 and 2014-2018 American Community Survey five-yearestimates.Does not include employed population in the Armed Forces.†

Universe: *In Labor Force; Population 16 years and older.

17

Community Data Snapshot Water Supply: Crystal Lake

WATER SUPPLYCMAP supports an integrated approach to water resource management, and encourages communities to incorporatewater supply and demand considerations into land use, transportation, and infrastructure investment decisions.Assessing demand, price, and loss trends of a community can inform decisions that strengthen regional water supplymanagement, maintain drinking water infrastructure, and manage demand. Click here to learn more about howcommunities can coordinate and conserve our shared water supply resources.

WATER SOURCE AND DEMAND TRENDS OF CRYSTAL LAKE*

Primary Water Source: Sandstone Groundwater**

2003 MGD*** 2013 MGD Percent

Total Water Withdrawals**** 4.60 4.40 -3.90Residential Sector 3.50 3.30 -3.60Non-Residential Sector 1.10 1.10 -4.80

Source: Analysis of Illinois Water Inventory Program water withdrawal data (2002-2013).* Only available for municipalities with community water suppliers providing service to the majority of the community. ** The primary water source of a community is based on the source of the majority of withdrawals from all wells and intakes within the community,including community water suppliers and industrial and commercial businesses. The majority of withdrawals is calculated as an average from yearly data,given year to year fluctuations. *** Millions of gallons per day. **** Total includes all community water suppliers and industrial and commercial wells/intakes within a municipality; private residential wells are notincluded. Residential sector includes withdrawals identified as residential by community water suppliers. Non-residential sector includes withdrawalsidentified as non-residential by the community water suppliers and withdrawals from industrial and commercial wells/intakes.

DAILY RESIDENTIAL WATER DEMAND PER CAPITA

Crystal Lake CMAP Region

2003 2013 Percent Change 2003 2013 Percent Change

Residential* (GPCD**) 87.2 82.8 -5.3 104.2 87.5 -17.4

Source: Analysis of Illinois Water Inventory Program water withdrawal data 2003-2013.* Residential sector includes withdrawals identified as residential by community water suppliers. The prevalence of private residential wells or communitywater suppliers that provide water outside of the municipal boundary could lead to artificially lower or higher GPCD values respectively. ** Gallons of water per capita per day (estimated unit use). Population values used in sector totals come from the U.S. Census.

18

https://www.cmap.illinois.gov/2050/environment/water-supply#water-planning

Community Data Snapshot Water Supply: Crystal Lake

WATER AND WASTEWATER PRICE TRENDS*

Real price per 1,000 gallons, in 2018dollars 2008 2018

PercentChange Annual Percent Change

Drinking Water $ 2.56 $ 4.97 64.0 6.9Sewer $ 2.48 $ 4.98 66.9 7.2Combined** (if applicable) N/A N/A N/A N/A

Source: Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant Water Rates Data for Northeastern Illinois, IISG19-RCE-RLA-031.* Only available for communities with water utilities and that responded to data requests. Percent changes and 2008 prices were adjusted for inflationusing the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistic's Consumer Price Index for the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin region.** Some utilities combine drinking water and sewer prices, rather than separating them out as two distinct rates.

WATER LOSS*

Reporting utility: Not a Lake Michigan permittee

2017

Nonrevenue Water (Millions of Gallons per Day)** N/AAnnual Cost of Nonrevenue Water ($) N/APercent of Nonrevenue Water to Water Supplied*** N/A

Source: Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Lake Michigan Allocation Program.* Data is only regionally available for Lake Michigan permittees; water losses from other communities and industrial and commercial businesses are notreported to the state. ** Nonrevenue water is the difference between net annual pumpage (water supplied) and billed, authorized consumption. Non-revenue water includeswater that is lost from the system due to underregistration of meters, systematic data handling errors, leakage anywhere within the distribution system,unauthorized consumption, or unbilled authorized consumption.*** The threshold for permit compliance is less than 12 percent of water supplied in Water Year 2015, decreasing to no more than 10 percent by Water Year2019 and all years thereafter. Permittees that exceed the threshold are required to submit a water system improvement plan.

19

Community Data Snapshot ON TO 2050 Indicators: Crystal Lake

ON TO 2050 INDICATORS

ON TO 2050 is the region's long-range comprehensive plan, adopted by CMAP in 2018. The plan includes a set ofindicators for quantifying its goals and measuring implementation progress. While many of these indicators can onlybe measured at a regional level, several can also be tracked at a local level. These have been laid out in the tablebelow, with comparisons to the region's current measure as well as the targets that the plan is aiming to reach by2050. Visit cmap.illinois.gov/2050/indicators to learn more.

CrystalLake CMAP Region

(Current) (Current) (Target) Source

Plan Chapter Indicator

COMMUNITY

Population located in highlywalkable areas

0.0% 41.5% 45.2% CMAP, 2015

Jobs located in highly walkableareas

0.0% 38.2% 45.2% CMAP, 2015

PROSPERITY

Population aged 25+ with anassociate's degree or higher

50.0% 45.9% 64.9% 2014-2018 ACS 5-Year

Workforce participation rateamong population aged 20-64

84.3% 80.6% 83.4% 2014-2018 ACS 5-Year

ENVIRONMENT

Population with park access of 4+acres per 1,000 residents

77.8% 41.5% 65.0% CMAP, 2013

Population with park access of 10+acres per 1,000 residents

51.9% 16.0% 40.0% CMAP, 2013

Impervious acres per household0.25 0.18 0.15 USGS National

Land CoverDataset, 2016

Daily residential water demand percapita (gallons)

82.8 87.5 65.2 Illinois WaterInventory Program,

2013

GOVERNANCE

State revenue disbursement percapita

$453.14 $286.21* N/A CMAP, 2018

Is per capita disbursement at least80% of regional median?

Yes Yes for 74% ofmunicipalities

Yes for 100% ofmunicipalities

CMAP, 2018

MOBILITY

Population with at leastmoderately high transit availability

0.9% 53.2% 65.0% CMAP, 2017

Jobs with at least moderately hightransit availability

1.0% 55.2% 58.0% CMAP, 2017

Percent of trips to work via non-SOV modes

17.6% 30.1% 37.3% 2014-2018 ACS 5-Year

*Median value of region's 284 municpalities.

20

https://www.cmap.illinois.gov/2050

https://www.cmap.illinois.gov/2050/indicators


For More Information Last updated July 2020

To improve the Community Data Snapshots in the future, CMAP wants to hear from you. Please take a quick surveyto describe how you use this data and what you'd like to see in next year's snapshots.

Please direct inquiries to [email protected]. To access other Community Data Snapshots for municipalities andcounties in the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning’s seven-county northeastern Illinois region, visithttp://www.cmap.illinois.gov/data/community-snapshots.

21

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/339KXSH

mailto:%[email protected]

http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/data/community-snapshots

community data snapshot crystal lake, municipality …lak… · community data snapshot: crystal...

Documents