cocate - corrosion of pipe...

34
27/03/2012 COCATE - Corrosion of pipe steel Autoclave tests for pipe steels and coatings X. Zhang, J. Zevenbergen, M. Spruijt

Upload: others

Post on 23-Oct-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 27/03/2012

    COCATE - Corrosion of pipe steel

    Autoclave tests for pipe steels

    and coatings

    X. Zhang, J. Zevenbergen, M. Spruijt

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    1

    Content

    1. Introduction

    2. Objective

    3. Approach methods

    4. Results

    Corrosion of steels

    Coatings on carbon steel

    Impedance measurements

    Cross section analysis

    Pull-off test

    Coatings with artificial scratches

    5. Conclusions

    6. Future work

  • 1. Introduction

    27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    2

    Pool A

    Pool B

    Pool C Le Havre Rotterdam

    Flue gases contain CO2, O2, SOx, NOx, H2O etc.

    Pipe materials: carbon steel, stainless steel?

    Questions: corrosion rate, possible solution?

    Pipes

    Pipelines/ships

    Pipes

  • 2. Objective

    Obtain corrosion data for steels in CO2 flue gas conditions

    Search for solutions (e.g. coatings)

    27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    3

  • Why does CO2 cause corrosion?

    Dry CO2 does not cause corrosion. Wet CO2 does.

    CO2 + H2O → H2CO3

    Fe + CO2 + H2O → FeCO3 + H2

    Cathodic reactions:

    2H2CO3 + 2e- → H2 + 2HCO3

    -

    2HCO3- + 2e- → H2 + CO3

    2-

    2H+ + 2e- → H2

    Anodic reaction:

    Fe → Fe2+ + 2e-

    27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    4

  • 3. Approach methods

    Simulation: to get parameters and estimate corrosion rates

    Experimental investigation: autoclave tests

    Set 1 (measuring the pH value and corrosion rate for metals):

    1. Stream CTPbp (CO2+ NO2, O2, N2 + H2O) (1.65 bar, 65°C )

    2. Stream 7Bp (CO2 + NO2, O2, N2, SO2 + H2O) (1.2 bar, 49°C)

    3. CO2 + H2O (100 bar, 60°C)

    Set 2 (Testing coating performance):

    Media: CO2 + 3.5% NaCl

    Temperature in corrosive media Tc = 60°C

    Pressure in autoclave P = 100 bar

    27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    5

  • 4. Results

    4.1 Calculation using NORSOK Model 506

    Empirical corrosion rate (CRt) model for carbon steel in water containing CO2 at different temperatures

    and wall shear stresses (S).

    t: 20 - 150°C

    CRt = Kt × fCO2 0.62×(S/19) 0.146 + 0.0324 log(fCO2) × f(pH)t (mm/year)

    t: 15°C

    CRt = Kt × fCO2 0.36×(S/19) 0.146 + 0.0324 log(fCO2) × f(pH)t

    t: 5°C

    CRt = Kt × fCO2 0.36× f(pH)t

    fCO2: the fugacity of CO2 in bar,

    f(pH)t : pH factor at temperature t.

    27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    6

  • Calculation using NORSOK M-506 model Pool 2_ stream CTPbp

    27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    7

    Pressure = 1.643 bar, Shear stress = 1 Pa, CO2 = 11.32 mole%

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    0 50 100 150 200

    Temperature / (°C)

    Co

    rro

    sio

    n r

    ate

    / (

    mm

    /ye

    ar)

    pH=4

    pH=5

    pH=6

    mole frac CO2 0.109004 0.113150 0.000044

    mole frac H2O 0.183007 0.151925 0.999943

    mole frac NO2 0.000060 0.000062 0.000002

    mole frac SO2 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000

    mole frac N2O 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000

    mole frac CO 0.000002 0.000002 0.000000

    mole frac CH4 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000

    mole frac O2 0.019001 0.019724 0.000000

    mole frac N2 0.688926 0.715138 0.000010

    Pipe inner diameter (mm) 212.7

    Pipe thickness (mm) 3.2

    Temperature © 64.72

    Pressure (bar) 1.643

    Velocity (m/s) 19.44

    pH: 4.4

    Corrosion rate: 2.7 mm/year

    (Impurities are not considered in

    the calculation.)

    Molar

    fraction

    Vapour

    phase

    Aqueous

    phase

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    8

    Stream Pool 4-7Bp

    Pressure = 1.15 bar, Shear stress = 1 Pa, CO2 = 8.566 mole%

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    0 50 100 150 200

    Temperature / (°C)

    Co

    rro

    sio

    n r

    ate

    / (

    mm

    /ye

    ar)

    pH=4

    pH=5

    pH=6

    mole frac CO2 0.084238 0.085662 0.000029

    mole frac H2O 0.116490 0.101548 0.999952

    mole frac NO2 0.000164 0.000167 0.000008

    mole frac SO2 0.000114 0.000116 0.000002

    mole frac N2O 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000

    mole frac CO 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000

    mole frac CH4 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000

    mole frac O2 0.087870 0.089356 0.000001

    mole frac N2 0.711124 0.723150 0.000008

    Pipe inner diameter (mm) 901.6

    Pipe thickness (mm) 6.4

    Temperature © 48.83

    Pressure (bar) 1.15

    Velocity (m/s) 21.02

    Molar

    fraction

    Vapour

    phase

    Aqueous

    phase

    pH: 4.5

    Corrosion rate: 1.7 mm/year

    (Impurities are not considered in the

    calculation.)

  • 4. Results

    4.1 Calculation using NORSOK Model 506

    4.2 Experimental results

    4.2.1 Corrosion of steels

    27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    9

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    10

    Experimental set-up

    Gas mixture container

    Heating system Stirring controller Autoclave

    Sample mounting

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    11

    2. Corrosion of Carbon steel

    S355 in flue 7Bp (1.2 bar, 49°C)

    pH 5.5

    Day 6: Corr rate: 0.2 mm/y

    Potential

    Log(C

    urr

    ent /A

    )

    Corrosion rate analysis

    -0.9 -0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.5

    V

    -6

    -5

    -4

    -3

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    12

    2. Corrosion of steels

    S335 steel in the CO2 CTP gas flue solution

    (1.65 bar, 65°C, pH during CO2 charging: 4.7-5.3)

    Time(day) CS1 CS2 CS3 Average (mm/y)

    3 0.23 0.14 0.11 0.16

    4 0.29 0.20 0.11 0.20

    5 0.37 0.23 0.23 0.28

    6 0.41 0.29 0.19 0.30

    7 0.41 0.29 0.20 0.30

    Corrosion current density in CTP flue

    0.0E+00

    5.0E-06

    1.0E-05

    1.5E-05

    2.0E-05

    2.5E-05

    3.0E-05

    3.5E-05

    4.0E-05

    2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    Time (day)

    i (A

    /cm

    ^2) CS1

    CS2

    CS3

    Corrosion rate

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    13

    Corrosion for carbon steel

    CO2 + H2O (600ml)

    100 bar 60 °C

    Day 6, Corrosion rate: 0.02 mm/y

    Potential

    Log(C

    urr

    ent /A

    )

    Corrosion rate analysis

    -60 -40 -20 0

    mV

    -8

    -7

    -6

    -5

    -4

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    14

    Corrosion of stainless steel 316S

    in flue 7Bp (1.2 bar, 49°C)

    pH 5.5

    Corr rate: 0.00005 mm/y

    Potential

    Log(C

    urr

    ent /A

    )

    Corrosion rate analysis

    0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6

    V

    -9

    -8

    -7

    -6

    -5

    -4

  • 4. Results

    4.1 Calculation using NORSOK Model 506

    4.2 Experimental results

    4.2.1 Corrosion of steels

    4.2.2 Coatings on carbon steel

    27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    15

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    16

    4.2.2 Coatings on carbon steel

    A: white,

    ~ 360 µm

    B: off-white,

    ~1060 µm

    C: grey,

    ~ 1150 µm

  • 4. Results

    4.1 Calculation using NORSOK Model 506

    4.2 Experimental results

    4.2.1 Corrosion of steels

    4.2.2 Coatings on carbon steel

    4.2.3 Impedance measurements

    4.2.4 Cross section analysis

    4.2.5 Pull-off test

    4.2.6 Coatings with artificial scratches

    27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    17

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    18

    4.2.3 Impedance measurements

    Impedance plots for three coatings in the CO2 plus 3.5% NaCl at 60ºC

    and 100 bar.

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    19

    After autoclave test (for 60 days)

    In 3.5% NaCl solution charged with CO2 to 100 bar at

    60°C

    (white) (off-white) (grey)

  • 4. Results

    4.1 Calculation using NORSOK Model 506

    4.2 Experimental results

    4.2.1 Corrosion of steels

    4.2.2 Coatings on carbon steel

    4.2.3 Impedance measurements

    4.2.4 Cross section analysis

    27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    20

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    21

    Cross section analysis: coating A

    delamination

    The white coating showed delamination at the coating/metal interface

    after the test.

    After exposure for 60 days Before the test

    Colour: white

    Thickness: ~ 360 µm

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    22

    Cross section analysis: coating B

    Off-white coating did not show delamination after the test

    After exposure for 60 days Before the test

    Colour: off-white; Thickness: ~1060 µm

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    23

    Cross section analysis: coating C

    Blisters are found in the coating, but not at the coating/metal interface

    After exposure for 60 days Before the test

    Colour: grey; Thickness: ~ 1150 µm

  • 4. Results

    4.1 Calculation using NORSOK Model 506

    4.2 Experimental results

    4.2.1 Corrosion of steels

    4.2.2 Coatings on carbon steel

    4.2.3 Impedance measurements

    4.2.4 Cross section analysis

    4.2.5 Pull-off test

    27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    24

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    25

    Pull-off test before and after the autoclave test

    A3 before exposure,

    (break in the coating)

    White coating

    A2 after exposure,

    (break at the coating/metal

    interface)

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    26

    Pull-off test

    B3 before exposure,

    (break in the coating)

    B2 after exposure,

    (break at the coating/metal

    interface)

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    27

    Pull-off test

    C3 before exposure,

    (break in the coating)

    C2 after exposure,

    (break partly it the coating)

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    28

    Pull-off strength test

    Sample Before exposure

    (MPa)

    After exposure

    (MPa)

    Breaking place

    Coating A 22.4 4.5 coating/metal

    interface

    Coating B 20.1 8.4 40% coating

    Coating C 10.4 9.0 In coating

  • 4. Results

    4.1 Calculation using NORSOK Model 506

    4.2 Experimental results

    4.2.1 Corrosion of steels

    4.2.2 Coatings on carbon steel

    4.2.3 Impedance measurements

    4.2.4 Cross section analysis

    4.2.5 Pull-off test

    4.2.6 Coatings with artificial scratches

    27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    29

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    30

    Coating with an artificial scratch

    Coating A Coating B Coating C

    After test in autoclave at 100bar and 60°C.

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    31

    5. Conclusions

    The corrosion rates calculated using NORSOK M-506 model are higher than

    that measured from experiments.

    The measured corrosion rate for carbon steel S355 in the flue gas environment

    is higher (about 0.3 mm/y) than in CO2 saturated water at 100 bar and 60°C

    (about 0.02mm/y) within 6 days.

    The stainless steel has a very low general corrosion rate in the flue gas

    environment.

    The off-white coating (B) performs better than the other two, which can be a

    good candidate for the application in the pipes to against the CO2 corrosion.

  • 27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    32

    6. Future work

    Mass loss test for carbon steel in the gas flue 7Bp

    Surface analysis to check localized corrosion

    Autoclave tests for coating B in different thickness

    Autoclave tests for coatings on CS/SS welds to simulate the coatings

    at joints of different materials.

  • Thank you!

    27-3-2012

    Cocate meeting in Copenhagen/Titel van de

    presentatie

    33

    COCATE (N° Grant Agreement: 241381-2)