ayp vs. aeis talking accountability @ carroll elementary october 5, 2010
TRANSCRIPT
AYP vs. AEISAYP vs. AEIS
Talking Accountability @ Carroll Elementary
October 5, 2010
Learning Objective #1Learning Objective #1
I can distinguish between Adequate Yearly Progress
(AYP) and Academic Excellence Indicator System
(AEIS)?
Learning Objective #3Learning Objective #3
I know the different student populations that affect the campus rating
as defined by AYP?
Learning Objective #2Learning Objective #2
I know the different student populations that affect the campus rating
as defined by AEIS?
AYP
vs
AEIS
Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)(AYP)
NCLB
Federal funding
Three indicators◦Reading/Language Arts◦Mathematics◦Attendance rate
Two standards◦Performance◦Participation
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Performance Standard◦In order to meet AYP, a campus must meet the
performance standard for percent proficient.
2009 – 2010 73% (Rdg.) 67% (Math) 2010 – 2011 80% (Rdg.) 75% (Math) 2011 – 2012 87% (Rdg.) 83% (Math) 2012 – 2013 93% (Rdg.) 92% (Math) 2013 – 2014 100% (Rdg.) 100% (Math)
Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)(AYP)
Performance Standard – Student Groups◦All Students◦African-American◦Hispanic◦White◦Economically Disadvantaged◦Special Education◦LEP
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Performance Standard – Assessments
◦ TAKS and TAKS-Accommodated Reading/ELA and Math (Grades 3-8 and 10) Reading and Math (Grades 3-5 Spanish)
◦ TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alternate Reading/ELA and Math (Grades 3-8 and 10)
◦ LAT – TAKS Reading/ELA and Math (Grades 3-8 and 10) Reading and Math (Grades 3-6 Spanish)
◦ LAT – TAKS-M Reading/ELA and Math (Grades 3-8 and 10)
◦ TELPAS Used in AYP Participation for students in their first year of
enrollment in US schools
Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)(AYP)
Participation Standard◦In order to meet AYP, a campus must meet the
participation standard for students enrolled on testing date.
95%
Academic Excellence Indicator Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)System (AEIS)
Tailored for the State of Texas
4 Ratings◦Exemplary◦Recognized◦Academically Acceptable◦Academically Unacceptable
Academic Excellence Indicator Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)System (AEIS)
Exemplary All subjects ≥ 90%
25 % Commended Performance for AS and ED Mathematics and Reading
Recognized All subjects ≥ 80% 15 % Commended Performance for AS and ED Mathematics and Reading
Acceptable Reading/ELA ≥ 70%Writing ≥ 70%Social Studies ≥ 70%Math ≥
60%Science ≥ 55%
Academic Excellence Indicator Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)System (AEIS)
Student Groups◦All Students◦African-American◦Hispanic◦White◦Economically Disadvantaged
Academic Excellence Indicator Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)System (AEIS)
Assessments Used…◦TAKS◦TAKS-Accommodated◦TAKS-Modified◦TAKS-Alternate◦LAT◦TELPAS
Academic Excellence Indicator Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS)System (AEIS)
Additional Information
◦The 1st and 2nd administration results of Grades 5 and 8 TAKS Reading and Math are combined. Students must be tested on the same campus for results to be used.
Data AnalysisData Analysis
Let’s analyze some actual campus
data…
Met AYP? AEIS Rating?Met AYP? AEIS Rating?Mathematics % Pass %
Commended
AS 91% (95%) 28% (31%)
AA 86% (93%) 20% (25%)
Hispanic 94% (96%) 33% (34%)
Eco Disadv 90% (94%) 27% (28%)
Reading % Pass % Commended
AS 87% (91%) 20% (22%)
AA 84% (88%) 15% (15%)
Hispanic 89% (92%) 23% (25%)
Eco Disadv 85% (89%) 19% (21%)
Met AYP? AEIS Rating?Met AYP? AEIS Rating?Writing % Pass %
Commended
AS 89% (99%) 22% (37%)
AA 86% (100%) 17% (24%)
Hispanic 91% (98%) 27% (45%)
Eco Disadv 86% (99%) 19% (36%)
Science % Pass % Commended
AS 79% (90%) 29% (32%)
AA 73% (80%) 13% (13%)
Hispanic 83% (98%) 40% (45%)
Eco Disadv 79% (89%) 28% (30%)
EvaluationEvaluation
List some differences between AYP and AEIS.
EvaluationEvaluation
List the student populations used to
calculate AEIS and AYP data.