1400 omma beh dane hulquist
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Behavioral Targeting from the Trenches:Reflections of an Agency Analyst
Dane Hulquist, SVP, Director of Ad ServicesUniversal McCann San Francisco
July 20, 2011OMMA Behavioral, San Francisco
Definitions and Context
For this presentation, "Behavioral Targeting" is… – Buying custom audiences via ad exchanges using a variety of leading
3rd party data providers – Buying pre-packaged audience segments directly with networks
It does not include…– Retargeting (unless noted)
The cases and generalizations are from campaigns with a broad media mix and $100k+/month (digital).
Silver Bullet or Wild Card?
Fluid data quality variables can make performance hard to predict.
Campaign Av-erage
Behavorial Targeting
Cost per Engagement
Campaign Av-erage
Behavorial Targeting
Cost per Engagement
Campaign Av-erage
Behavorial Targeting
Cost per Engagement
Consumer Tech Engagement CampaignsOct 10 – Mar 11
Typical Challenge: Scaling Success
Endemic
Behavorial
Q2 Consumer Service Acquisition Campaign
Conversions
Cost
per
Con
vers
ion
(Size= Spend)
Scaling with Audience Discovery
Do the best data segments align with the target definition?
Upfront Target Requirements:• $150k per year• High-level business execs
Discovered Audience: Administrative Assistants
Audience Skew by Most Significant Visitors
Premium Travel Customer Acquisition Campaign
Considering ‘Targeted Engagement’
Superior targeting not reflected in standard engagement metrics.
Target
All other
Landing Site Comp
Mob
ile S
earc
h
Paid
Sea
rch
In-S
trea
m V
ideo
Cont
extu
al S
earc
h
Beha
vior
Tar
getin
g
Ende
mic
Sta
ndar
d
Ove
r the
Pag
e U
nit
Spon
sors
hip
Ende
mic
Ric
h
Mob
ile D
ispla
y
Road
bloc
k
Hypothetical Cost per Targeted Engagement
H1 Executive Decision Maker Engagement Campaign
Mob
ile S
earc
h
Paid
Sea
rch
In-S
trea
m V
ideo
Cont
extu
al S
earc
h
Beha
vior
Tar
getin
g
Disp
lay
- Ani
mat
ed
Ove
r the
Pag
e U
nit
Spon
sors
hip
Disp
lay
- Ric
h
Mob
ile D
ispla
y
Road
bloc
kCost per Engagement
The Sting of AttributionDoes BT suffer the biasing effects of last-ad more than endemic?
Network A Network B Network C
Consumer Acquisition CampaignNetwork vs. Ad Server Conversion
CountsJan 2011
Network Ad Server
FacebookSearch EngineSearch Engine
SiteEndemic Network
Contextual SearchSiteSite
Endemic NetworkSite
Endemic NetworkEndemic Network
SiteSite
BT Custom Audience
-50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 100.0% 150.0% 200.0%
B2B Engagement Campaign% Change Last Ad to Weighted Con-
versions(Top 15 Properties)
Oct 2010 - Mar 2011
Low edit relevance = suppressed clicks High comp = increase latent response
BT Microcosm of Attribution Headaches
Predictive Targetinggets robbed by…
Behavioral Targetinggets robbed by…
Retargeting
Unlocking Brand Ad Budgets
When does BT's superior targeting outweigh it's lack of contextual relevance in driving attitudinal results efficiently?
$0.00
$20.00
$40.00
$60.00
$80.00
$100.00
$120.00
$140.00
$160.00
$0.00 $2.00 $4.00 $6.00 $8.00 $10.00
eCPM
Co
st P
er M
Bra
nd
Rec
all
Imp
ress
ion
s
Microsoft Online Online
You TubePlatform A US
Adzinia Media
eBay
Yahoo Inc.
Gaw ker Media
Collective Media
Interclick
ESPN
Cadreon
2010 Consumer Brand Favorability CampaignBrand Recall Efficiency (Nielsen IAG)
(Size= Imps)
An Analyst’s BT Lists
WishesNetwork-side optimization based on in-unit interaction
High-fidelity attitudinal measurement
Cross-platform segments (and tracking)
WorriesFuzzy ad delivery chain
Lack of standard segment definitions
Death of the cookie
Thank You!