wrf model boundary layer height validation using the vaisala ceilometer

22
WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using the Vaisala Ceilometer Scott Mackaro, Ph.D. - Vaisala 2014 National Air Quality Conferences AIR QUALITY FORECASTING, MAPPING, AND MONITORING Advanced Technology

Upload: rosalyn-hebert

Post on 31-Dec-2015

41 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using the Vaisala Ceilometer . Scott Mackaro, Ph.D. - Vaisala. 2014 National Air Quality Conferences AIR QUALITY FORECASTING, MAPPING, AND MONITORING Advanced Technology. A little background…. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using the Vaisala Ceilometer Scott Mackaro, Ph.D. - Vaisala

2014 National Air Quality ConferencesAIR QUALITY FORECASTING, MAPPING, AND MONITORING Advanced Technology

Page 2: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/20232

A little background….

Vaisala uses Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) along with advanced data assimilation techniques to assess the impacts of observations

Improve inputs to Decision Support Systems (DSSs)–Roads– Airports–Wind Energy

Focus is short term, high impact events–High resolution simulations – Targeted solutions

Hypothesis: My boundary layer height growth isn’t correlating with hub height turbulence because the timing of growth is incorrect.

Page 3: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/20233

The Boundary Layer

The bottom layer of the troposphere that is directly influenced by the surface of the earth

Influenced by friction and heat fluxes Subject to diurnal variations

The importance of studying and understanding the boundary layer

It is where we live Important in terms of pollution, including its development and

dispersion Vital to monitoring and forecasting

Page 4: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/20234

Boundary Layer analysis – Mixing Layer

The mixing layer height (MLH) A key parameter in the

characterization of air pollution.– important for its ability to

disperse pollutants. Defined as the vertical extent of

a boundary layer that is uniformly mixed through surface induced forcing.

Challenge: How to accurately and routinely assess the structure of the boundary layer, including the mixing layer height

Page 5: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/20235

Measuring the Boundary Layer…or lack thereof

IHOP 2002“Boundary layer heights are derived from reflectivity profiles measured by the lidar on board the DLR-Falcon…”Couvreux, et al. 2009

“Ideal urban test beds would include quasipermanent mesoscale networks with surface, canyon, rooftop, and PBL meteorological and air quality observations…” BAMS 2012

Page 6: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/20236

Serendipity (sĕr′ən-dĭp′ĭ-tē)n. 1. The faculty of making fortunate discoveries by accident.

Page 7: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/20237

Single lens ceilometer – Vaisala CL31

Simple and reliable instrument design. Cost effective Sufficient overlap already 10 m above the system. Measurements up to 7.6km More than 3000 units in operation.

Transmitter

Receiver

Mirror

Lens

Page 8: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/20238

Single lens ceilometer – Vaisala CL51

Garmisch-Partenkirchen Research vessel Polarstern Station Nord, Greenlandoperated by KIT, IMK-IFU operated by AWI, Bremerhaven operated by Risø DTU, Roskilde

Unchanged optical setup compared to CL31. Larger lens and modified electronics increase SNR significantly. Designed for harsh environments. Measurements up to 13km

Page 9: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/20239

Vaisala CL31/CL51 – Cloud observations

Page 10: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/202310

Vaisala CL31/CL51 – Signal in the noise

Page 11: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/202311

Analyzing the Boundary Layer - BLVIEW

Vaisala Boundary Layer View Software BL-VIEW is used for collecting, storing, analyzing, and presenting data from Vaisala Ceilometers CL31 and CL51.

BL-VIEW calculates the boundary layer structure based on an algorithm which identifies the mixing height according to the aerosol concentration.

The received backscatter signal is high in the boundary layer due to the higher concentration of particles, whereas the signal strength is expected to drop in the free atmosphere.

To reduce sensitivity to noise and temporary details in atmospheric structure, vertical and temporal averaging are also carried out.

Page 12: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/202312

All-weather Algorithm

The algorithm is enhanced by processing the data with the following procedures.

Cloud and precipitation filter Variable averaging Variable Thresholds Outlier removal

Retrieval algorithms have been developed and applied to ceilometer data using techniques such as the gradient method (see next slide).

Page 13: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/202313

Boundary Layer Analysis – Gradient Method

The mixed layer is expected to have a somewhat constant concentration that is higher than in the layers above.

Consequently, the difference between the mixed layer and the air above is assumed to be seen as a shift from a relatively strong backscatter inside the mixed layer to a lower backscatter level above it.

The technique selects the maximum of the negative gradient of the backscatter coefficient to be the top of the mixed layer.

Mixing height definition:The height value z where-d/dz, the negative gradient of the backscatter coefficient has a

maximum.

Page 14: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/202314

Validating the WRF boundary layer

With a boundary layer measurement in hand, I wanted to test various BL parameterizations within the WRF

Domain centered on a CL31 operated by the Puget Sound Clear Air Agency Nested domain:

12 km (outer) and 4km (inner).

Thirty-nine vertical levels, Stacked near the surface

No data assimilation3 Months of data

Page 15: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/202315

Results

WRF tends to overestimate boundary layer height YSU and MYNN provide the most reasonable estimations of

boundary layer height.*In this location during this time period*

Most probable cause is land use categorization. Land tends to be simulated drier than it actually is resulting in

larger sensible surface flux, less latent flux.

Special case when early morning, low level clouds and precipitation occur (Case study on next slides)

Page 16: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/202316

Case study – Clouds and Precip.

Top: BLVIEW backscatter density plots with overlaid radiosonde soundings from Quillayute, WA (UIL)

Bottom: Best estimate BL height measurement and WRF simulated BL height

July 10 – 13 case

Page 17: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/202317 Special thanks to

Page 18: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/202318 Special thanks to

Page 19: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/202319 Special thanks to

Page 20: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/202320

WRF case study summary

The NWP simulations appear to have trouble simulating the presence of light precipitation as indicated by a rapidly growing simulated PBLH instead of suppressed growth due to presence of morning clouds and surface moisture.

MYNN and YSU provided the best representation in these cases, suppressing the PBLH in the presence of clouds and low level precipitation.

Page 21: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/202321

General thoughts and take away

Hypothesis confirmed.

As with any model issue, we can’t begin to fix parameterizations without having observations to let us know something is wrong!

The ceilometer proved to be a useful observation tool for measuring the mixed layer height.

The 1100+ ASOS network ceilometers currently deployed do not report the information needed to measure boundary layer height.

Page 22: WRF Model Boundary Layer Height Validation Using  the  Vaisala Ceilometer

Page External use © Vaisala 04/19/202322

Questions?

See us at the Vaisala booth for real-time demonstrations of BL-VIEW using the CL31