why air pollution is bad for human health (cities for clean air : london 2012)

18
Wh i i ll i bd Why is air pollution bad for human health? for human health? Dr Ian S Mudway MRC-HPA Centre for Environment & Health Kings College London Health, King s College London

Upload: cleanairuk

Post on 23-Jun-2015

956 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Dr Ian Mudway, a researcher at MRC-HPA Centre for Environment and Health, King's College London in the UK, showed these slides as part of his presentation at 'Cities for Clean Air : London 2012' on July 14 2012 in London, UK. The meeting was hosted by Network for Clean Air (http://www.cleanairuk.org). Note: The sound quality changes markedly after 22 minutes & 10 seconds - don't be alarmed! This was due to equipment failure. Dr Ian Mudway's talk followed-on from one other at the conference. There is a news report about this here: http://www.airqualitynews.com/2012/07/20/lungs-of-london-schoolchildren-damaged-by-poor-air-quality/ Further information about Dr Ian Mudway see http://www.kcl.ac.uk/biohealth/research/divisions/aes/about/people/Mudway/index.aspx

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)

Wh i i ll i b dWhy is air pollution bad for human health?for human health?

Dr Ian S Mudway

MRC-HPA Centre for Environment & Health King’s College LondonHealth, King s College London

Page 2: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)
Page 3: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)

Who died?Deaths Registered in London Administrative County Classified by Age

Who died?

(Bates, 1995)< 1

Monthof Age

1-12 Mo.Old

1-14Yearsof Age

15-44Yearsof Age

45-64Yearsof Age

65-74Yearsof Age

75+Yearsof Age

WeekBeforetheEpisode

16 12 10 61 237 254 335

Week 28 26 13 99 652 717 949WeekAfter theEpisode

28 26 13 99 652 717 949

Before/After

E i d1.75 2.17 1.3 1.62 2.75 2.82 2.83

EpisodeRatio

The greatest relative increase in mortality was from bronchitis,which rose nine foldwhich rose nine-fold

Page 4: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)

Health Effects of Ambient PollutionHealth Effects of Ambient Pollution

H it l

Death

• Hospital admissions

1952 London Fog

Doctor visits

Hospital Admissions rose by 50%

• Respiratory admissions by 160%ev

erity

Asthma attacks, medication use, symptoms

admissions by 160%Se

lung function changes, immune cell responses, heart rate or heart rate variability responses

Proportion of effected populationProportion of effected population

Page 5: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)
Page 6: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)

Health impact of fine particulateHealth impact of fine particulate pollution

Steubenville 89 9 29 6 12 8

Total particles (μg/m3)

Fine particles (μg/m3)

Sulfate particles (μg/m3)

Steubenville 89.9 29.6 12.8

St. Louis 72.5 19.0 8.1

Harrimen 49.4 20.8 8.1

Watertown 49.2 14.9 6.5

Topeka 56.6 12.5 4.8

Portage 34.1 11.0 5.3

6

Dockery DW, et al. N Engl J Med 1993;329(24):1753-9

Page 7: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)

Th Si Citi t dThe Six Cities study

Dockery DW, et al. N Engl J Med 1993 Dec 9;329(24):1753-9

Page 8: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)

2nd October 2011

Page 9: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)

C iControlled Diesel Exposures

Exposure to DE: PM10 300µg/m3 and filtered air for 1 hour & p 10 µg100µg/m3 and filtered air for 2 hours

Page 10: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)

Diesel induces inflammationDiesel induces inflammation

Neutrophils after air

N hilNeutrophils after DE

Page 11: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)

Responses to PM in the Real WorldDoes short term exposure to real world atmospheres (diesel traffic and

background) cause respiratory effects in asthmatics?

Responses to PM in the Real Worldbackground) cause respiratory effects in asthmatics?

Oxford Street

Hyde Park

McCreanor al. (2007) New Eng J Med 357: 2348-2358.

PM10 =72 µg m-3, PM2.5 =11.2 µg m-3, 11.7 ppb NO2 18,300 particles cm-3

PM10 =125 µg m-3, PM2.5 =28.3 µg m-3, 76.5 ppb NO2 63,700 particles cm-3

Page 12: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)

R t PM i th R l W ldResponses to PM in the Real WorldI i d l f i I fl iImpaired lung function Inflammation

McCreanor J et al. N Engl J Med. 2007 Dec 6;357(23):2348-58

Page 13: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)

PM Concentration Near a Major Roadj

Prevailing Wind 50m100m100m

500m

NO2

Fine, PM2.5

Ultrafine, PM0.1

Beckerman et al. (2008) Atmos Enviro. 42:275-290.

Page 14: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)

Children’s respiratory healthPostcodes in the Tower Hamlets area

within 100 m of major road

Children s respiratory health

within 100 m of major road

14

Page 15: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)

Linkage at residential addressLinkage at residential address level to estimated modelled exposures (NOx, NO2, PM10, PM )

15

PM2.5)

Page 16: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)
Page 17: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)

How does the choice of route impact on an i di id l ?individuals exposure?

Page 18: Why air pollution is bad for human health (Cities for Clean Air : London 2012)

SummarySummary• Prolonged exposure to elevated PM is associated with significant g p glife-shortening and poor respiratory health. Acute episodes can precipitate death in sensitive subjects.

S bj i h i i di l di i• Subjects with pre-existing cardiopulmonary conditions are particularly sensitive.

• Reductions in ambient PM provide measurable health benefits• Reductions in ambient PM provide measurable health benefits

• Human chamber and field exposures have provided a mechanistic evidence to underpin the validity of the epi-observationsevidence to underpin the validity of the epi-observations

• Individual exposures can be limited by informed use of the urban environment

18

environment