was quantitative easing policy effective? · (ii) duration commitment continue qep until cpi...
TRANSCRIPT
Was Quantitative Easing Policy Effective?
MIHIRA, Tsuyoshi (Toyo University)YAMASAWA, Nariyasu (Atomi University)SEITANI, Haruki (Economic and Social Research Institute)SAITO, Jun (Economic and Social Research Institute)
New Monetary Policy Framework(Introduced March 2001)
(i) Shift to Quantitative TargetCall Rate Current Account Balance
(ii) Duration CommitmentContinue QEP until CPI Inflation Rate Be Stably Positive
(iii) Increase in JGB Purchase Operation
Interest Rate Target Policy
Quantitative Easing Policy
A Macroeconomic Model with ‘Excess Money’
Macroeconomic Model
Excess Money
Changes in Excess Money
Estimation Results of Macroeconomic Model
Effect of QEP on GDP Growth
Transmission Mechanisms of QEP
New Monetary Policy Framework
(1) Interest Rate Effect (2) Expectation Effect - Commitment Effect - Time-lag Effect - Signaling Effect (3) Portfolio Rebalancing Effect - Induced by Increase in CAB Target - Induced by Increase in BOJ’s JGB purchase
Attainable by Zero Interest Rate Policy as well
Effects Unique to Quantitative Easing …Focus of this paper
Examination of Expectation EffectModel
Estimation Equation
Changes in Implied Forward Rates
Results on Expectation Effect(JGB IFR; QE = CAB)
(Notes) Dum = QEP Period DummyVariations of estimations are found on Tables 4-1 and 4-2
cf. Commitment Effect
(Note) Dum2 = Dummy for periods with monetary policy commitmentFull estimation results are on Table 4-3
Banks’ Loan Supply Function
(Note) Variations of estimations are found on Table 5-1
Bank’s Bond Investment Function
(Note) Variations of estimations are found on Tables 5-2
A CAPM-based FrameworkCAPM
Estimation Model
Changes in QEP Measurements
Portfolio Rebalance Effect on EquitiesDependent Variable:Excess Return on Equity = E(rt
NKY-rtf) = E(lnPt+22
NKY-lnPtNKY)- rt
f
(Note) Results for volatility equation are on Table 6-1Results for different sample period are on Table 6-2
(Level Estimation)
(Differenced Estimation)
Estimation 1 Estimation 3IV_NKY 7.3330 (6.905)*** 5.5348 (5.818)***lnBOJ_JGB 5.5981 (5.274)***lnBOJ_CA 1.4200 (6.243)***J-test [p-value] 58.912 [0.000] 66.275 [0.000]
Estimation 2 Estimation 4IV_NKY 5.2387 (5.651)*** 4.6558 (5.098)***DlnBOJ_JGB -0.1133 (-0.215) DlnBOJ_CA 0.1071 (0.650) J-test [p-value] 64.755 [0.000] 72.498 [0.000]
Portfolio Rebalance Effect on JGBDependent Variable:Excess Return on JGB = E(rt
JGB-rtf) = E(lnPt+22
JGB-lnPtJGB)- rt
f
(Note) Results for volatility equation are on Table 6-3Results for different sample period are on Table 6-4
(Level Estimation)
(Differenced Estimation)
Estimation 1 Estimation 3IV_JGB 6.9526 (7.619)*** 9.0787 (8.254)***lnBOJ_JGB 0.0446 (0.435) lnBOJ_CA 0.0010 (0.036) J-test [p-value] 56.313 [0.000] 45.675 [0.000]
Estimation 2 Estimation 4IV_JGB 8.5247 (8.339)*** 8.7362 (7.816)***DlnBOJ_JGB 0.2769 (3.213)***DlnBOJ_CA -0.0293 (-0.748) J-test [p-value] 53.091 [0.000] 45.733 [0.000]
Portfolio Rebalance Effect on Corporate Bonds
Aa A1-year 3-year 5-year 1-year 3-year 5-year
HV-1 0.1157 0.9193 0.0503 -0.0888 0.1074 -0.0329 (0.2534) (1.6153) (0.1908) (-0.0799) (0.3428) (-0.0777)
lnBOJ_JGB -0.0014*** 0.0036*** -0.0008*** -0.0038*** -0.0039*** -0.0051***(-14.0714) (6.4882) (-3.9437) (-11.9041) (-16.9191) (-23.1366)
Adj.R-sq 0.250 -2.053 0.114 0.322 0.339 0.476J-test 36.251 34.590 62.915 28.180 41.336 27.981[p-value] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000]
Baa Ba1-year 3-year 5-year 1-year 3-year 5-year
HV-1 1.1453 3.8444*** 2.5145** 2.3642*** 4.2286*** 2.2828***(0.6307) (4.6703) (2.5687) (2.8441) (3.3135) (3.7632)
lnBOJ_JGB -0.0061*** -0.0032*** -0.0061*** -0.0274*** -0.0228*** -0.0316***(-10.9857) (-6.3372) (-6.9651) (-9.8555) (-7.1026) (-9.3848)
Adj.R-sq 0.254 -0.069 0.097 0.199 0.070 0.098J-test 32.455 53.006 41.077 33.405 47.109 40.654[p-value] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000] [0.000]
Dependent Variable:Excess Return on Corporate Bonds = ri,t
Bond-rtJGB
(Note) Results for QE=BOJ_CA are on Table 6-5; Results for volatility equation are on Table 6-5
Portfolio Rebalance Effect on Bank Loans
(Level Estimation)
(Differenced Estimation)
Dependent Variable:Excess Return on Bank Loans = rt
Loan-rtJGB
Default +6 5.3641* (1.850) 2.1760** (2.109) 6.1508* (1.799)lnJGB_OPE 0.0218** (1.987)lnBOJ_JGB 0.0076*** (3.325)lnBOJ_CA 0.0056** (2.130)Sample 1996M9-2006M1 1995M3-2006M1 1995M3-2006M1J-test [P-Value] 2.048 [0.915] 5.775 [0.449] 1.673 [0.947]
Default +6 -0.3464 (-0.085) -3.5236 (-0.279) -0.0488 (-0.006)lnJGB_OPE -0.1655*** (-4.522)lnBOJ_JGB -0.0358*** (-3.060)lnBOJ_CA 0.0220* (1.697)
1996M10-2006M1 1995M4-2006M1 1995M4-2006M1J-test [P-Value] 13.163 [0.041] 5.373 [0.497] 5.856 [0.439]
Some Problems in Estimation
Sensitivity to sample periods
Spurious regressionNon-stationarityMissing variable bias
Over-identification test
Summary of Examination on QEP
I. Macroeconomic Effect……………….……………. Effective
II. Transmission Mechanisms (1) Interest Rate Effect……………………………. Not Unique to QEP (2) Expectation Effect - Commitment Effect…………………………… Effective, but not Unique to QEP - Time-lag/Signaling Effect…………………….. No Effect Found (3) Portfolio Rebalancing Effect - Induced by Increase in CAB Target…………... No Effect Found - Induced by Increase in BOJ’s JGB purchase…. No Certain Results