the eu ist project brain/mind - itu

18
Page 1 The EU IST Project The EU IST Project The EU IST Project The EU IST Project BRAIN/MIND BRAIN/MIND BRAIN/MIND BRAIN/MIND An IP solution for systems beyond 3G An IP solution for systems beyond 3G An IP solution for systems beyond 3G An IP solution for systems beyond 3G The EU IST Project The EU IST Project The EU IST Project The EU IST Project BRAIN/MIND BRAIN/MIND BRAIN/MIND BRAIN/MIND An IP solution for systems beyond 3G An IP solution for systems beyond 3G An IP solution for systems beyond 3G An IP solution for systems beyond 3G Dave Wisely BTexact Technologies MIND Technical Manager [email protected] ITU Seminar on IMT-2000 and systems beyond Ottawa, 28 th May 2002

Upload: others

Post on 03-Feb-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1

The EU IST Project The EU IST Project The EU IST Project The EU IST Project BRAIN/MINDBRAIN/MINDBRAIN/MINDBRAIN/MIND

An IP solution for systems beyond 3GAn IP solution for systems beyond 3GAn IP solution for systems beyond 3GAn IP solution for systems beyond 3G

The EU IST Project The EU IST Project The EU IST Project The EU IST Project BRAIN/MINDBRAIN/MINDBRAIN/MINDBRAIN/MIND

An IP solution for systems beyond 3GAn IP solution for systems beyond 3GAn IP solution for systems beyond 3GAn IP solution for systems beyond 3GDave Wisely

BTexact TechnologiesMIND Technical Manager

[email protected]

ITU Seminar on IMT-2000 and systems beyondOttawa, 28th May 2002

Page 2

Introduction Introduction Introduction Introduction ---- Recent DevelopmentsRecent DevelopmentsRecent DevelopmentsRecent DevelopmentsIntroduction Introduction Introduction Introduction ---- Recent DevelopmentsRecent DevelopmentsRecent DevelopmentsRecent Developments

• Dominance of IP applications– Voice over IP is becoming common– IP is the transport technology for UMTS Releases 4 and 5

• Growth of new access technologies– Wireless LANs – Public and corporate offerings in 2002 in

the UK– ADSL – people become used to fast Internet/Intranet

access• New “User-driven” prospective

– Requirement for personal mobility– Ad-hoc networks outside the control of operators

• More complicated business models– IP clearly separates networks and services

Page 3

AAL2Switching

Cloud

IP-based micro-mobility

ISSL QoS

IP backboneDiffServIP - macro mobility management

Global Internet

BillingSIP

Proxy Server

SP Server Farm

AAA

ADSL

IGSNGateway

BRAIN/MIND: VisionBRAIN/MIND: VisionBRAIN/MIND: VisionBRAIN/MIND: VisionBRAIN/MIND: VisionBRAIN/MIND: VisionBRAIN/MIND: VisionBRAIN/MIND: Vision

BRAINAccess Routers

MIND Wireless Routers

MIND Mobile Routers

Hiperlan

Hiperlan/802.11

Bluetooth

UMTSVerticalHandover

Page 4

BRAIN/MIND ObjectivesBRAIN/MIND ObjectivesBRAIN/MIND ObjectivesBRAIN/MIND ObjectivesBRAIN/MIND ObjectivesBRAIN/MIND ObjectivesBRAIN/MIND ObjectivesBRAIN/MIND Objectives• To enable broadband mobile multimedia applications

– Providing adaptation to changing QoS– Enabling flexible and dynamic service provision

• To design an IP-based mobile access network– With IP mobility, QoS and security functionality– Including wireless/mobile ad-hoc extensions

• To define the requirements of a broadband air interface – Interface to IP access network– Spectrum requirements for systems beyond 3G

• To validate our fundamental design principles– To trial the use of WLANs and IP access networks as

a complement to UMTS• To contribute to global standardization

Page 5

MIND Project StructureMIND Project StructureMIND Project StructureMIND Project StructureMIND Project StructureMIND Project StructureMIND Project StructureMIND Project Structure• RTD project of the IST

Programme of the EU• Duration: Jun 01 - Nov 02• Website: http://www.ist-mind.org

Page 6

BRAIN End Terminal Architecture BRAIN End Terminal Architecture BRAIN End Terminal Architecture BRAIN End Terminal Architecture (BRENTA)(BRENTA)(BRENTA)(BRENTA)BRAIN End Terminal Architecture BRAIN End Terminal Architecture BRAIN End Terminal Architecture BRAIN End Terminal Architecture (BRENTA)(BRENTA)(BRENTA)(BRENTA)

PHYLink Layer with QoS MAC

IP Layer with QoS and Mobility Support

Transport Layer

QoS and Mobility Support

Session Layer Protocols (SIP, H323, RSVP..)

Type A Type B Type C Type D

BRAIN Component Level API

BRAIN High-level API

ApplicationLayer

SessionLayer

BRAIN QoSBROKER GUI

Transport Layer

Link Layer

IP LayerIP2W

Interface

Extended SocketInterface

Page 7

Typical ScenarioTypical ScenarioTypical ScenarioTypical ScenarioTypical ScenarioTypical ScenarioTypical ScenarioTypical Scenario

Internet

Long

rang

e (U

MTS

, GPR

S, e

tc.)

Longrange (UMTS, GPRS, etc.)

MMR /Multihomingdevice

Shortra

nge high

perform

ance link

Shortrange high performance link

Player

Mobile UserSh

ortra

nge

high

per

form

ance

link

Shortrange high

performance link

Player

Player

Simple device: nomultihoming and onlyshortrange

This link issplittingapart whenthe two carsare nolonger inproximity

Player

Longrange (UMTS, GPRS, etc.)

Multihomingdevices: shortrangeand longrange

Game Server

MobileCommunicationNetwork

Shortrange highperformance link

Simple device: nomultihoming and onlyshortrange

Page 8

IP Design Principles (an allIP Design Principles (an allIP Design Principles (an allIP Design Principles (an all----IP IP IP IP network)network)network)network)IP Design Principles (an allIP Design Principles (an allIP Design Principles (an allIP Design Principles (an all----IP IP IP IP network)network)network)network)

• Network Transparency– The “End to End Principle” as

applied to Mobile Wireless Networks– Network simply delivers packets

(unopened)• Enable & encourage future evolution

– Means component independence– obey the layer model– Keep efficiency without tight

integration (3G)• Solve only the special problems of

Mobile Wireless Access– Leave the fixed network to the IETF,

and contribute mobile wireless parts there

IP CoreHosts usingstandard IP

protocols

'Stupid looking'network

Connectionless QoS-assured IPv4/v6 packet

deliveryBMG

BARIP packets sentto and receivedfrom terminal,

unchanged bynetwork

Page 9

MIND Network ArchitectureMIND Network ArchitectureMIND Network ArchitectureMIND Network ArchitectureMIND Network ArchitectureMIND Network ArchitectureMIND Network ArchitectureMIND Network Architecture

ACCESSNETWORKQoSMobility ManagementControl

AccessRouters

MobilityGateway

IP NetworkACCESSNETWORK

VerticalHandover

UTRAN

HorizontalHandover

MIND Mobile Routers

MobileNode

AccessNetwork WirelessRouters

Page 10

Mobility Management Mobility Management Mobility Management Mobility Management –––– Major FunctionsMajor FunctionsMajor FunctionsMajor FunctionsMobility Management Mobility Management Mobility Management Mobility Management –––– Major FunctionsMajor FunctionsMajor FunctionsMajor Functions

Paging

Path Updates

Handover FrameworkMobile Node to Access Router Protocol

Mobility RequirementsMobility RequirementsMobility RequirementsMobility Requirements• Minimise mobility signalling trafficMinimise mobility signalling trafficMinimise mobility signalling trafficMinimise mobility signalling traffic• Provide seamless handovers (Min. delay and without loss of packeProvide seamless handovers (Min. delay and without loss of packeProvide seamless handovers (Min. delay and without loss of packeProvide seamless handovers (Min. delay and without loss of packets) ts) ts) ts) • Be scalable Be scalable Be scalable Be scalable • Be robust, i.e. supports multiple routes or rapid reBe robust, i.e. supports multiple routes or rapid reBe robust, i.e. supports multiple routes or rapid reBe robust, i.e. supports multiple routes or rapid re----routingroutingroutingrouting• Is compatible with other Internet protocolsIs compatible with other Internet protocolsIs compatible with other Internet protocolsIs compatible with other Internet protocols

Page 11

BRAIN Candidate Mobility Management BRAIN Candidate Mobility Management BRAIN Candidate Mobility Management BRAIN Candidate Mobility Management ProtocolProtocolProtocolProtocol

BRAIN Candidate Mobility Management BRAIN Candidate Mobility Management BRAIN Candidate Mobility Management BRAIN Candidate Mobility Management ProtocolProtocolProtocolProtocol

• Access Routers (Access Routers (Access Routers (Access Routers (ARARARARs) are located at the access network edge and offer IP connectivity, default router to the Mobile Hosts (MHs) that they serve

• Anchor Points (Anchor Points (Anchor Points (Anchor Points (ANPANPANPANPs) are located ‘inside’ the access network, own & allocate addresses, authenticate users, maintain user records, tunnel packets to Access Routers

• Mobility Gateways(Mobility Gateways(Mobility Gateways(Mobility Gateways(MGMGMGMGs) standard border routers (no mobility specific functionalities), distributing traffic to correct ANPs.

MH

AR

ARAR

AR

ANP

MHMH

ANPANP

MGMG

AR

ARAR

AR

ANP ANPANP

MGMG

AR

ARAR

AR

ANP ANPANP

MG MG

Page 12

The MIND IP to Wireless (IP2W) InterfaceThe MIND IP to Wireless (IP2W) InterfaceThe MIND IP to Wireless (IP2W) InterfaceThe MIND IP to Wireless (IP2W) InterfaceThe MIND IP to Wireless (IP2W) InterfaceThe MIND IP to Wireless (IP2W) InterfaceThe MIND IP to Wireless (IP2W) InterfaceThe MIND IP to Wireless (IP2W) Interface

AddressManagement QoS Control

Idle ModeSupport

HandoverControl

ConfigurationManagement

SecurityManagement

ErrorControl

MulticastSupport

HeaderCompression

BufferManagement

SegmentationRe-assembly

IP2W Control Interface IP2W Data Interface

Basic Data Transport FunctionWireless Link Control Functions

QoSSupport

IP2Wcompatiblewirelesslink layer

•IPIPIPIP2222W is applicable to different link layer technologiesW is applicable to different link layer technologiesW is applicable to different link layer technologiesW is applicable to different link layer technologies

•Makes the most efficient use of any functionality available Makes the most efficient use of any functionality available Makes the most efficient use of any functionality available Makes the most efficient use of any functionality available below layer 3below layer 3below layer 3below layer 3

•QoSQoSQoSQoS support must be provided below layer 3 on the support must be provided below layer 3 on the support must be provided below layer 3 on the support must be provided below layer 3 on the wireless linkwireless linkwireless linkwireless link

Page 13

HIPERLAN/2 IP Convergence LayerHIPERLAN/2 IP Convergence LayerHIPERLAN/2 IP Convergence LayerHIPERLAN/2 IP Convergence LayerHIPERLAN/2 IP Convergence LayerHIPERLAN/2 IP Convergence LayerHIPERLAN/2 IP Convergence LayerHIPERLAN/2 IP Convergence Layer• Detailed IP SSCS

specification completed• IPv4 & IPv6 support

– IntServ, Diffserv

• Detailed Address resolution schemes

• IP2W interface support– QoS mapping & scheduling– detailed network handover– Paging (complies IETF

drafts)– Unicast, Anycast,

Multicasting

Convergence Layer (CL)

IPEnhancement to support IP2W Interface

Service SpecificConvergenceSublayer(SSCS)

Common Part(CP)

Common Part Convergence Sublayer (CPCS)

Segmentation And Reassembly (SAR)

Data Link Control(DLC) layer

Control Plane User Plane

Control Plane User Plane

Control Plane User Plane

DLC Control SAP DLC User SAP

CL User SAPCL Control SAP

IP2W Interface

Transparentto controlmessages

Cell based Packet basedATM 1394 Ethernet 3G Inter-

workingIP

H/2 Convergence Layer(s)

Page 14

HIPERLAN/2 Physical layer HIPERLAN/2 Physical layer HIPERLAN/2 Physical layer HIPERLAN/2 Physical layer EnhancmentsEnhancmentsEnhancmentsEnhancmentsHIPERLAN/2 Physical layer HIPERLAN/2 Physical layer HIPERLAN/2 Physical layer HIPERLAN/2 Physical layer EnhancmentsEnhancmentsEnhancmentsEnhancments• Enhancements

– Range– Efficiency– Mobility support (speed)– Ad-hoc support

• Typical strategies– Multiple antennas– Turbo coding– Adaptive modulation

• Mac layer enhancements– QoS support– Multipoint - multipoint

-5 0 5 10 15 2010 -2

10 -1

10 0

C / N [dB]

Pack

et E

rror

rate

ETSI Channel C; burst length = 1.476 ms; BPSK 1/2

3 km/h20 km/h30 km/h40 km/h

Page 15

MIND TrialsMIND TrialsMIND TrialsMIND TrialsMIND TrialsMIND TrialsMIND TrialsMIND Trials• Application QoS control• WLAN - UMTS Handover

– Comparison of coupling techniques– Measurement of performance

• Mobility and QoS protocol comparison and test– BCMP vs HMIP– QoS framework and extensions

• Evaluation of the H2 physical layer– Evaluation of BRAIN enhancements

• Integration – Roaming and macro-mobility– Application, QoS and mobility

interaction

Page 16

MIND IP layer QoS MIND IP layer QoS MIND IP layer QoS MIND IP layer QoS testbedtestbedtestbedtestbedMIND IP layer QoS MIND IP layer QoS MIND IP layer QoS MIND IP layer QoS testbedtestbedtestbedtestbed

BAN Core networkDS enabled

At leas t one layer of routers

ACCESS ROUTER ACCESS ROUTER

Correspondent Node

MGMG

Router

Hub

Mobile Term inal with video and sound capabilities

MIND QoS Test-bed•802.11 Wireless Hops•DiffServ Access network•RSVP signalling•Admission control at Access Nodes •Interactions with mobility

–Mobile IP v6–BCMP

•Possible extensions–QoS Broker–Bounded delay DiffServ

Page 17

Summary Summary Summary Summary ---- MIND continues to solve MIND continues to solve MIND continues to solve MIND continues to solve the “Beyond 3G” jigsaw!the “Beyond 3G” jigsaw!the “Beyond 3G” jigsaw!the “Beyond 3G” jigsaw!

Summary Summary Summary Summary ---- MIND continues to solve MIND continues to solve MIND continues to solve MIND continues to solve the “Beyond 3G” jigsaw!the “Beyond 3G” jigsaw!the “Beyond 3G” jigsaw!the “Beyond 3G” jigsaw!

Spectrum RequirementsQoS

All-IP radio access network

ad-hocWLANUMTS

handover

Business models ScenariosBroadbandradio access

Mobility

Page 18

AcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsAcknowledgements

This work has been performed in the framework of the IST project IST-2000-28584 MIND, which is partly funded by the European Union. The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of their colleagues from Siemens AG, British Telecommunications PLC, Agora Systems S.A., Ericsson Radio Systems AB, France Télécom S.A., King's College London, Nokia Corporation, NTTDoCoMo Inc, Sony International (Europe) GmbH, T-Systems Nova GmbH, University of Madrid, andInfineon Technologies AG.