the essence of effective advertising
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
© 2009
Dan Hill, Ph.D.
BMAMinneapolis, MN
February 11th, 2010
© 2009
• Emotional Connection Is Essential– Neurobiology– Profits
• Change Testing– Facial Coding
• 5 Guidelines with Examples– Be On-Emotion– Leverage the Sensory Bandwidth– Seek Brand Fame (Authority/Quality)– Value (Reduce Price Sensitivity)– Mirror Values
2
© 2009
Neurobiology
3
© 2009
4
© 2009
Emotiona
l
22
33 Rationa
l
2233
11
Sensor
y
11
The 3-Part Brain
© 2009
The Conscio
us
NeurobiologyThe Subconscious Rules
© 2009
Feel
Think
NeurobiologyFeel First & Fast(er)
© 2009
Emotional
Rational (10%)
NeurobiologyBrain Exchange
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
9
“I don’t like spinach, and I’m glad I don’t, because if I liked it, I’d eat it, and
I just hate it.”
-Clarence Darrow
Myth of Objectivity
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
New Mental Model
10
vs. BehavioralTraditional
© 2009
Part 1: Emotional Connection Is
Essential
Profits
11
© 2009
Definitive Study
Based on 880 case studies drawn from databank for
the IPA Effectiveness Awards, world’s most rigorous advertising
competition
12
Institute of Practitioners in Advertising
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
Emotive Marketing Works
Soft Sell, Hard Currency
Classification of Campaigns
14
Rational vs. Emotional Buying
15
Emotional Campaigns Succeed
16
Price Sensitivity is a Good Path to Profit
17
Part 2: Change Testing
Facial Coding
18
Usual Pre-Testing Is Weak
19
Cases Using Quantitative Pre-
Testing
Cases Using Qualitative Pre-Testing
Reliability as Indicators of Success (Profitability) 44% 43%
© 2009
Facial Coding
20
“The face is an enormously rich source of information
about emotions.”
Lie to Me
© 2009
Why Facial Coding Works
© 2009
22
“The face is an enormously rich source of information about emotions.”
Facial Coding Enters the Mainstream
“By the 1980s, psychologists had largely accepted as a ‘fundamental
axiom of behavioral science’ the link between faces and emotions.
Emotion therefore explains facial behavior, and facial behavior is an
objective index of emotion.”
© 2009
Part 3: Five Guidelines
23
#1: BE ON-EMOTION
24
Rule #1
© 2009
21st - Century Marketing
© 2009
Impact
Sherwin Williams – Quality Example
26
Ap
pea
l & Im
pac
tA
ppe
al &
Imp
act
AppealImpact
More promising ending, slow start but rebounds. Reasonable amount of impact throughout.
© 2009
Sherwin Williams – Poor Example
27
AppealImpact
Ap
pea
l & Im
pac
t
Off emotion on first peak, fewer data points, blank ending
© 2009
EDS – Trust as Key
• When EDS was creating their new vision for the company, the CEO’s ideas were not well accepted. Notice, in particular, the difference between verbal input on the CEO’s idea and emotional response to that same idea.
28
© 2009
Astra Zeneca Sales Claims
29
Overall Rational
Rational feedback indicates that all is well with the sales
scripts. Emotional data tells a different story.
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
#2: LEVERAGE SENSORY
30
Rule #1
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
-Fixations
stabilized gaze
-Saccades
rapid eye scans
Eye trackingmeasures:
To absorb visual / text information, people require at least a 50 millisecond fixation duration
Eye Tracking Scan Path
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
Advertising Ignored
32
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
Canon - Success
33
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
Canon - Disappointment
34
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
#3: SEEK BRAND FAME
35
Rule #1
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
IBM Spot
36
-20-15-10-505
101520
Sec 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 297.5
8
8.5
9
9.5Appeal Impact
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
Nextel Spot
37
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
#4: REDUCE PRICE SENSITIVITY
38
Rule #1
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
Cargill – Florence
39
-20-15-10-505
101520
Sec 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 297.5
8
8.5
9
9.5Appeal Impact
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
#5: MIRROR VALUES
40
Rule #1
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
Conversation Economy
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
Value Proposition = Values
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
Word of Mouth Advertising
43
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
Waste Management – Green
44
Gender Sensitivity
Emotional Profile
42%
10%
11%
25%
0%
0%
5%
1%
6%
1%
0.0% 50.0%
True Smile
Robust Smile
Weak Smile
Micro Smile
Surprise
Skeptical
Dislike
Sadness
Frustration
Anxiety
83%
17%
0%
Positive Negative
Neutral
Overall Emotion: (% of res)
56%
12%
32%
Positive Neutral
Negative
Self Report
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
SUMMARY
46
Rule #1
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
47
Impressions
Personality
Values
© 2010. All Rights Reserved
48
Dan Hill, [email protected]
om651.224.7647
Visit us at: www.sensorylogic.co
m
Thanks!
Q & A