surface wave elimination by interferometry and adaptive subtraction

25
SURFACE WAVE ELIMINATION BY INTERFEROMETRY AND ADAPTIVE SUBTRACTION YANWEI XUE YANWEI XUE University of Utah University of Utah

Upload: lester-hunt

Post on 30-Dec-2015

24 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WAVE ELIMINATION BY INTERFEROMETRY AND ADAPTIVE SUBTRACTION. YANWEI XUE University of Utah. Outline. Surface Wave Problem & Remedy Theory of Interferometric Filtering 2D Field Data Results 3D Field Data Results Conclusions. Problem: Surface waves blur the seismograms. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

SURFACE WAVE ELIMINATION BY INTERFEROMETRY AND ADAPTIVE SUBTRACTION

YANWEI XUEYANWEI XUE

University of UtahUniversity of Utah

OutlineOutline

• Surface Wave Problem & RemedySurface Wave Problem & Remedy• Theory of Interferometric FilteringTheory of Interferometric Filtering• 2D Field Data Results2D Field Data Results• 3D Field Data Results3D Field Data Results• ConclusionsConclusions

dd

00

2.02.072007200

Tim

e (s

)T

ime

(s)

Receiver (m)Receiver (m)

A seismogram with surface waves and reflectionsA seismogram with surface waves and reflections

00

Problem: Surface waves blur the Problem: Surface waves blur the

seismograms.seismograms.

dd surfsurf

Surface Surface waveswaves

== ++ dd refref

Reflection Reflection

waveswaves

Solution: Filter the surface waves by Non-Solution: Filter the surface waves by Non-Linear Filter (NLF) and interferometric Linear Filter (NLF) and interferometric methodmethod

OutlineOutline

• Surface Wave Problem & RemedySurface Wave Problem & Remedy• Theory of Interferometric PredictionTheory of Interferometric Prediction• 2D Field Data Results2D Field Data Results• 3D Field Data Results3D Field Data Results• ConclusionsConclusions

Prediction of Surface WavesPrediction of Surface WavesNear-OffsetNear-OffsetSurf. WaveSurf. Wave

A B

Mid-OffsetMid-OffsetSurf. Wave Surf. Wave

A B

Near-OffsetNear-OffsetSurf. Wave Surf. Wave

A B

A BA B A B

A B

Basic StrategyBasic Strategy

Surface waves are Surface waves are removed completely?removed completely?NoNo

Input data Input data dd

dd

Output Output data data

YesYes

rr

Interferometric predictionInterferometric prediction

^

ss

ss ddLeast squares Least squares subtractionsubtraction

^ ^

00

2.02.0

00 36003600

Tim

e (s

)T

ime

(s)

Receiver (m)Receiver (m)

Nonlinear Local FilterNonlinear Local Filter

OutlineOutline

• Surface Wave Problem & RemedySurface Wave Problem & Remedy• Theory of Interferometric FilteringTheory of Interferometric Filtering• 2D Field Data Results2D Field Data Results• 3D Field Data Results3D Field Data Results• ConclusionsConclusions

00

2.02.0

00 36003600

Tim

e (s

)T

ime

(s)

Receiver (m)Receiver (m)

Raw DataRaw Data

Remove Surface Waves by NLF Remove Surface Waves by NLF

00

2.02.0

00 36003600

Tim

e (s

)T

ime

(s)

Receiver (m)Receiver (m)

Remove Surface Waves by Int.+NLFRemove Surface Waves by Int.+NLF

00

2.02.0

00 36003600

Tim

e (s

)T

ime

(s)

Receiver (m)Receiver (m)

00

2.02.0

00 36003600

Tim

e (s

)T

ime

(s)

Receiver (m)Receiver (m)

Raw DataRaw Data

00

2.02.0

00 36003600

Tim

e (s

)T

ime

(s)

Receiver (m)Receiver (m)

Remove Surface Waves by F-KRemove Surface Waves by F-K

Remove Surface Waves by Int.+NLFRemove Surface Waves by Int.+NLF

00

2.02.0

00 36003600

Tim

e (s

)T

ime

(s)

Receiver (m)Receiver (m)

00

2.02.0

00 36003600

Tim

e (s

)T

ime

(s)

Receiver (m)Receiver (m)

Surface Waves Predicted by F-KSurface Waves Predicted by F-K

Surface Waves Predicted by Int.+NLFSurface Waves Predicted by Int.+NLF

00

2.02.0

00 36003600

Tim

e (s

)T

ime

(s)

Receiver (m)Receiver (m)

OutlineOutline

• Surface Wave Problem & RemedySurface Wave Problem & Remedy• Theory of Interferometric FilteringTheory of Interferometric Filtering• 2D Field Data Results2D Field Data Results• 3D Field Data Results3D Field Data Results• ConclusionsConclusions

Line 9 Before and After Removal of Surface WavesLine 9 Before and After Removal of Surface Waves

00

4.04.0

Tim

e (s

)T

ime

(s)

00 50005000ReceiverReceiver (m)(m)

00

4.04.0

Tim

e (s

)T

ime

(s)

00 50005000Receiver (m)Receiver (m)

Line 11 Before and After Removal of Surface WavesLine 11 Before and After Removal of Surface Waves

00

4.04.0

Tim

e (s

)T

ime

(s)

00 50005000Receiver (m)Receiver (m)

00

4.04.0

Tim

e (s

)T

ime

(s)

00 50005000Receiver (m)Receiver (m)

Line 13 Before and After Removal of Surface WavesLine 13 Before and After Removal of Surface Waves

00

4.04.0

Tim

e (s

)T

ime

(s)

00 50005000Receiver (m)Receiver (m)

00

4.04.0

Tim

e (s

)T

ime

(s)

00 50005000Receiver (m)Receiver (m)

Line 14 Before and After Removal of Surface WavesLine 14 Before and After Removal of Surface Waves

0

4.0

Tim

e (s

)

0 5000Receiver (m)

0

4.0

Tim

e (s

)

0 5000Receiver (m)

OutlineOutline

• Surface Wave Problem & RemedySurface Wave Problem & Remedy• Theory of Interferometric FilteringTheory of Interferometric Filtering• 2D Field Data Results2D Field Data Results• 3D Field Data Results3D Field Data Results• ConclusionsConclusions

ConclusionsConclusions

•This approach is effective for surface wave removal in both 2D and This approach is effective for surface wave removal in both 2D and 3D cases.3D cases.

•Advantages:Advantages:

•Limitations:Limitations:

•Better than FK method for irregular acquisition geometry.Better than FK method for irregular acquisition geometry.•No need for a near surface velocity model.No need for a near surface velocity model.

•Sensitive to the choice of NLF parameters.Sensitive to the choice of NLF parameters.•Parameter selection can be expensive.Parameter selection can be expensive.

•Future Work:Future Work:•Eliminate need for non-linear local filter.Eliminate need for non-linear local filter.•More tests on 3D data.More tests on 3D data.

AcknowledgementAcknowledgement

I thank the sponsors of 2006 UTAM consortium for their financial support.

THANKS!THANKS!