structure in schools- hoy n miskel ppt

19
Structure in Schools Hoy and Miskel, 2008 10/24/2012

Upload: pretywomn

Post on 08-Nov-2014

126 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

leadership in schools

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

Structure in Schools Hoy and Miskel, 2008

10/24/2012

Page 2: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

Max Weber (1947) Division of Labor

Division of labor produces specialization which increases efficiency. Impersonal Orientation Decisions are based on fact and not feelings. Hierarchy of Authority A system of superordination (superiors) and subordination (subordinates) to guarantee

compliance and discipline Rules and Regulations Ensures uniformity of behavior of the employees. Career Orientation Promotion of loyal employees based on seniority and achievement.(dispassionate

decisions) Efficiency Bureaucracy maximizes expertise, rational decisions, and administrative efficiency.

Model of Bureaucracy (Formal organization)

10/24/2012

Page 3: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

Weber’s Model of Bureaucracy in Popular TV

Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce is the incarnation of Weber’s bureaucratic model MAD MEN (TV series)

rules and regulations –stable and

without personality- even when

seduced by a beautiful

woman, he remains

incorruptible

He has the office on top floor-highest source of authority Charismatic authority

10/24/2012

Page 4: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

Critique of Weber’s Model

1. Dysfunctional aspects are not considered

2. Informal organization is neglected

3. Dual structure of bureaucratic model

4. Feminist critique

10/24/2012

Page 5: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

Dysfunctional Features of Bureaucracy

Function

Expertise

Rationality

Compliance and

Coordination

Continuity and Stability

Incentive

Characteristic

Division of Labor

Impersonal Orientation

Hierarchy of Authority

Rules and Regulations

Career Orientation

Dysfunction

Boredom

Lack of morale

Communication

blocks

Rigidity and goal

displacement

Conflict between

achievement and

seniority10/24/2012

Page 6: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

Functions and Dysfunctions of Rules

Functions Dysfunctions

Explication Reinforce Apathy(minimum acceptable )Screening (buffering) Goal displacementLegitimate Punishment Create legalismLeeway Indulgency (leniency)

10/24/2012

Page 7: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

10/24/2012

It is the spontaneous development of a social structure and culture within a formal organization

Informal Organization- “Shadow Organization”

How does it develop within a formal organization?

Personal relations

Division into cliques (based on feelings, common lounge, age, similar interests, etc)

Social norms (appropriate behavior)

Informal roles( unofficial spokesperson, informal leaders)

Informal communication(the grapevine)

Page 8: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

10/24/2012

Dual Structure of the Bureaucratic Model

Is bureaucratic administration based primarily on expertise, or is it based on rules and discipline?

The answer to this question creates the conflict of dual bureaucracy in Weber’s model.

Page 9: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

10/24/2012

Feminist Critique

Bureaucracies promote male values at the expense of female ones.

Hierarchy

Impersonality

Independence

Competition

Rationality

VS.

Equalitarian

personalized

dependence

Cooperation

Emotionality

Page 10: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

Structure in Schools -HALL

10/24/2012

Two Types of Rational Organizations rather than One integrated model -Hall(1962)

Bureaucratic Pattern Hierarchy of Authority Rules for employees Procedural Specifications Impersonality

Professional Pattern Technical Competence Specialization

Page 11: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

Formal Structure in Schools

10/24/2012

Page 12: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

Predicted Changes In School Structure

10/24/2012

Chaotic Organization

AuthoritarianOrganization

ProfessionalOrganization

WeberianOrganization

Stable Environment

Turbulent Environment

Page 13: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

Structure in Schools –Hoy and Sweetland (2000-2001)

10/24/2012

School structures can be described along a continuum from enabling to hindering.

Enabling School Structure

Enabling Hierarchy

Enabling formalization (rules & procedures)

Use two-way

communicationView problems as

opportunitiesSeek mutual solutionsSupport differencesPractice opennessEmbrace the unexpectedCorrect mistakes

Hindering School Structure

Hindering Hierarchy

Coercive formalization (rules &procedures)

Impose top-down

communicationView problems as

constraintsForce consensusSuspicious of differencesBe cautious and closedFear the unexpectedPunish mistakes

Page 14: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

Key Parts of Structure- Mintzberg

Techno-Structure

Strategic Apex

Support Staff

Middle Line

Operating Core

10/24/2012

superintendent over a school district

School principal

Coordinators- instructional supervisors

teachers

Accountant-maintenance

Page 15: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

They are the fundamental means organizations use to monitor and control work. These mechanisms are the glue the hold the organization together.

Mutual Adjustment--informal communication Direct Supervision--personal command Standardization of Work– work program directions Standardization of Output--specify work results Standardization of Skills--specify training

Coordinating Mechanisms-Mintzberg

10/24/2012

Page 16: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

Five Combinations and Five Basic Structures (Mintzberg)

10/24/2012

Simple Structure

Machine Bur.

Professional Bur.

Divisional Form

Adhocracy

Directive Supervision

Stand. of Work

Stand. of Skills

Stand. of Outputs

Mutual Adjustment

Strategic Apex

Technostructur

e

Operating Core

Middle Line

Support Staff

Page 17: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

Loose Coupling Perspective

Loose couplings are structural connections among school units in the bureaucratic structure. Ex. the administration of a school has little influence on what is happening in the classroom.

Schools are complex organizations with both tight and loose structural connections.

Bureaucracies tend to be tightly structured.Professional organizations tend to be more loosely structured.

Tight coupling promotes limits discretion of teachers.Loose coupling enhances discretion of teachers.

10/24/2012

Page 18: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

Professional and Bureaucratic Orientations

Professional Orientation

• Expertise• Objective perspective• Impersonal approach• Service to clients

Bureaucratic Orientation

• Expertise• Objective perspective• Impersonal approach• Service to the organization

Sources of Conflict between Orientations

• Colleague reference group • Hierarchical orientation • Autonomy in decision making • Disciplined compliance• Self-imposed control • Subordinated to the organization

Sources of Compatibility between Orientations

10/24/2012

Page 19: Structure in Schools- Hoy n Miskel ppt

Questions/Comments

10/24/2012