stakeholders feedback for the year 2016-2017€¦ · cy6251 67engg. chemistry - ii 70 68 71 64 71...

27
STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017

Upload: others

Post on 19-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76

STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017

Page 2: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 3: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 4: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 5: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 6: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 7: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76

ANNEXURE III Feedback for Teacher Evaluation by Student

Class wise Analysis Report

Class: ist cse-a batch :2016-2020

Subject code

Subject name Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Students Entered

Total Avg.

HS6251 TECHNICAL ENGLISH - II 64 63 58 60 62 62 61 59 57 58 59 63 23

61

MA6251 MATHEMATICS - II REFER CBS FEEDBACK

PH6251 ENGG. PHYSICS - II 66 68 69 66 65 66 66 65 69 65 66 69 25

67

CY6251 ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24

67

CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN

81 73 73 66 63 68 68 76 63 73 67 73 24 70

CS6202 PROGRAMMING AND DATA STRUCTURES-I

73 73 73 76 75 74 76 69 69 73 73 73 35 73

Q-1 Teacher Preparation and Presentation Q-7 Capability to keep class under discipline and control

Q-2 Teacher Explanation in Clearing Doubts

During Class Q-8

Precise Uses of teaching aids (PPT, Black board, Web Centric

Resource, Digital Lecture ,Debate & Discussion )

Q-3 Teacher Commitment in Completing

Syllabus Q-9 Quality of study material provided

Q-4 Ability to organize test ,quiz

&Assignments Q-10

How would you rate him/her to teach the same subject to your

juniors?

Q-5 Ability to make student understand Q-11 How Would you Rate him/her to teach you any other subjects?

Q-6 Ability to give Example to explain the

concept Q-12 Teachers overall performance

Page 8: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76

ANNEXURE III Feedback for Teacher Evaluation by Student Analysis Report

DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH

SL.NO Subject code & Subject name

Class /

Section

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12

Students Entered

Total Avg.

1 HS6251 - Technical

English - II

1ST Year

EEE 91 85 90 88 85 81 83 83 79 83 81 88 26 85

1ST Year

Mech-A 90 87 87 93 93 93 97 90 90 87 87 100 6 91

2 HS6251 - Technical

English - II

1ST Year CSE-A

64 63 58 60 62 62 61 59 57 58 59 63 23 61

1ST Year CSE-B

97 99 99 97 96 95 93 95 95 96 95 99 15 96

3 HS6251 - Technical

English - II

1ST Year BT

60 53 58 53 51 54 60 52 54 51 52 55 23 54

1ST Year MECH-B

45 41 42 47 42 41 49 42 41 41 42 46 24 43

Q-1 Teacher Preparation and Presentation Q-7 Capability to keep class under discipline and control

Q-2 Teacher Explanation in Clearing Doubts

During Class Q-8

Precise Uses of teaching aids (PPT, Black board, Web

Centric Resource, Digital Lecture ,Debate &

Discussion ) Q-3 Teacher Commitment in Completing Syllabus Q-9 Quality of study material provided

Q-4 Ability to organize test ,quiz &Assignments Q-10 How would you rate him/her to teach the same subject

to your juniors?

Q-5 Ability to make student understand Q-11 How Would you Rate him/her to teach you any other

subjects?

Q-6 Ability to give Example to explain the concept Q-12 Teachers overall performance

Page 9: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76

STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2015-2016

Page 10: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 11: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 12: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 13: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 14: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 15: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76

STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2014-2015

Page 16: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 17: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 18: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 19: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 20: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 21: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76

STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2013-2014

STUDENTS FEEDBACK BASED ON FACULTY PERFORMANCE (DEPARTMENTWISE)

Page 22: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 23: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 24: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76
Page 25: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76

STUDENTS FEEDBACK BASED ON FACULTIES PERFORMANCE (SEMESTER WISE)

Feedback about faculties performance in odd semester

77

1914

30

57

96

90 % and Above

80 % and Above

70 % and Above

60 % and Above

50% and above

others

Feedback of students about faculties performance in even

semester

62

63

34

14

29

70

90 % and Above

80 % and Above

70 % and Above

60 % and Above

50% and above

others

Page 26: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76

Conclusion

From the student’s feedback analysis, slight deviation was found in 70% and above. The following corrective actions were

taken to improve the faculty performance.

(i) All Faculty members are advised to attend faculty development programme (FDP), workshop, seminars and FDP

programmes conducted internally at our institute.

(ii) Faculty members are advised to use multimedia tools for lecturing.

List of Questions:

1. Teacher's preparation and presentation

2. Teacher's explanation in clearing the doubts during the class hours

3. Teacher's commitment in completing the syllabus

4. Teacher’s punctuality

5. Ability to make the Students understand

6. Ability to give example to explain concept

7. Capacity to keep the Class under discipline and Control

ALUMNI FEEDBACK - ANALYSIS

1. What is your current academic/ professional career status?

2. Do you receive regular updates from the college through Mails/ Calls?

3. Are you willing to contribute to the development of the college?

4. What extent does the college help you to develop your attitude towards team work and Decision making?

5. Have you obtained sufficient technical knowledge?

Q.No Weightage Total No.of

Responses

No.of

positive

responses

No.of

Negative

Responses

Percentage

of positive

responses

Percentage

of negative

responses

1 0.3 75 70 5 93.33 6.67

2 0.2 75 75 0 100 0

3 0.1 75 68 7 90.67 9.33

4 0.2 75 70 5 93.33 6.67

5 0.2 75 70 5 93.33 6.67

Page 27: STAKEHOLDERS FEEDBACK FOR THE YEAR 2016-2017€¦ · CY6251 67ENGG. CHEMISTRY - II 70 68 71 64 71 69 70 60 59 64 68 71 24 CS6201 DIGITAL PRINCIPLE AND SYSTEM DESIGN 81 7366 6368 76

PARENTS FEEDBACK

The following points are observed from the feedback of parents while conducting PTA meeting.

1. Facilities provided by the college are adequate

2. Discipline and caring is good

3. Examination system ( I Hour test ) is very good concept.

4 Excellent hostel facilities

5. Opportunity to upgrade technical skills are very good.