smartmeter&projectin&gothenburg,&&sweden&nov 23, 2010 · through the advanced...
TRANSCRIPT
4/9/11
1
Deployment of the Smart Meters and Feed-in Tariff for Renewable Energy
Market Penetration
23 November 2010 Cairo, Egypt
Prof. Saifur Rahman Virginia Tech, Washington, DC
Invited Talk Cairo University
(c) Saifur Rahman 2
Source: Interna-onal Energy Agency (IEA Sta-s-cs 2007 data, available as of September 2010)
Smart Meter Project in Gothenburg, Sweden
4/9/11
2
(c) Saifur Rahman 3
Source: Interna-onal Energy Agency (IEA Sta-s-cs 2007 data, available as of September 2010)
Smart Meter to Hub -‐ Zigbee Connec;vity
(c) Saifur Rahman 4
Voltage Reduc;on Program in Virginia
In April, 2007, the Virginia State Corporation Commission (SCC) passed legislation enacting a statutory goal of 10% reduction in retail energy consumption over 2006 levels by 2022. One such program is a novel Conservation Voltage Reduction (CVR) program leveraging Advanced Metering Infrastructure for both control and verification purposes.
4/9/11
3
(c) Saifur Rahman 5
Voltage Reduc;on Program in Virginia
In Virginia, the electric utility is required to maintain the retail residential voltage within +/- 5% of standard 120V. Through the Advanced Metering Infrastructure (smart meter) the utility is able to maintain the voltage within range. For each 1% voltage reduction, they can reduce the energy consumption between 0.5 to 1%
(c) Saifur Rahman 6
Voltage Reduc;on Program in Virginia Fully deployed, CVR systems like this could reduce 2.6 million mega-watt hours per year by 2016. Dominion calculates over $1 billion in customer savings over 15 years and a $600 million total investment.
4/9/11
4
(c) Saifur Rahman 7
Renewable Energy – Deployment Experience
Source: Interna-onal Energy Agency (IEA Sta-s-cs 2007 data, available as of September 2010)
Why some countries are more successful than others ?
(c) Saifur Rahman 8
Feed-‐in Tariff (FIT)
Source: Interna-onal Energy Agency (IEA Sta-s-cs 2007 data, available as of September 2010)
FIT is a renewable energy policy that offers guaranteed payments to renewable energy developers for the electricity they produce FITs are responsible for approximately 75% of global PV and 45% of global wind deployment
4/9/11
5
(c) Saifur Rahman 9
Basic FIT Payment Choice
Source: Interna-onal Energy Agency (IEA Sta-s-cs 2007 data, available as of September 2010)
Fixed FIT policies - Guaranteed price for a fixed period of time Premium FIT policies - Either a sliding or a constant premium payment on top of the spot market price
Time
FIT Purchase Price (c/kWh)
FIT Price(c/kWh)
ElectricityPrice(c/kWh)
Time
FIT Premium (c/kWh) FIT Premium
(c/kWh)
ElectricityPrice
Actual FIT Premium Amount (c/kWh)
Source: NREL, “Feed-in-Tariffs: A Policy and Economic Analysis” , 2009
(c) Saifur Rahman 10
United States Incentives/Policies for Renewable Energy
4/9/11
6
(c) Saifur Rahman 11
US Federal Incen;ves for RE
Source: Interna-onal Energy Agency (IEA Sta-s-cs 2007 data, available as of September 2010)
Renewable Electricity Production Tax Credit (PTC):
• Commercial and industrial sectors • Amount: 2.2¢/kWh for wind; 1.1¢/kWh for other eligible
technologies. Generally applies to first 10 years of operation. • Carryover Provisions: Unused credits may be carried forward
for up to 20 years following the year they were generated U.S. Department of Treasury - Renewable Energy Grants:
• Amount: 30% of capital subsidy for solar and small wind • Ends 12/31/2010
(c) Saifur Rahman 12
California – Incen;ves and Policies
Source: Interna-onal Energy Agency (IEA Sta-s-cs 2007 data, available as of September 2010)
California Incentives/Policies for Renewable Energy
4/9/11
7
(c) Saifur Rahman 13
California – Incen;ves and Policies
California Feed-In Tariff - Performance-Based Incentive (time-differentiated, market-based prices):
Example: FIT for Southern California Edison: At 1 PM on a weekday in June is $0.32/kWh
(baseline grid supplied electricity costs about $0.20/kWh at this time).
(c) Saifur Rahman 14
California – Incen;ves and Policies
Other examples: Property Tax Exclusion for Solar Energy Systems:
• 100% of system value; No maximum cap
California Solar Initiative - PV Incentives - • Performance-Based Buy-downs for systems under 30 kW at $2.50/W
• Performance-Based Incentives (PBI) for systems 30 kW and larger at
$0.39/kWh for the first five years
4/9/11
8
(c) Saifur Rahman 15
Virginia – Incen;ves and Policies
Source: Interna-onal Energy Agency (IEA Sta-s-cs 2007 data, available as of September 2010)
Virginia Incentives/Policies for Renewable Energy
(c) Saifur Rahman 16
Virginia – Incen;ves and Policies
Tenn Valley Authority - Generation Partners Program:
• $1,000 plus $0.12/kWh above the base rate for Solar • PPA: 10 years
Property Tax Exemption for Renewable Energy Systems: • Allows any county, city or town to exempt or partially exempt
solar energy equipment Virginia - Net Metering:
• Net excess generation credited to next bill at retail rate
4/9/11
9
(c) Saifur Rahman 17
European Union Incentives/Policies for Renewable Energy
(c) Saifur Rahman 18
Germany: Feed-‐In Tariffs
Cost plus profit model (Fixed FIT Policy):
- Average grid-supplied domestic electricity price: $0.29/kWh
4/9/11
10
(c) Saifur Rahman 19
UK: Feed-‐In Tariffs (April 2010)
Cost plus profit model (Fixed Tariff):
- Average grid-supplied domestic electricity price: $0.30/kWh
Energy Source
Scale FIT(USD/kWh)
Duration(years)
Solar PV < 4kW (New) 0.58 25Solar PV < 4kW (Retrofit) 0.67 25Solar PV > 4-‐10 kW 0.58 25Solar PV > 10-‐100 kW 0.51 25Solar PV > 100kW -‐ 5 MW 0.47 25Wind < 1.5kW 0.56 20Wind > 1.5-‐15 kW 0.43 20Wind > 15-‐100 kW 0.39 20Wind > 100-‐500 kW 0.30 20Wind > 500kW -‐ 1.5 MW 0.15 20Wind > 1.5 MW -‐ 5 MW 0.07 20
(c) Saifur Rahman 20
Italy: Feed-‐In Tariffs
Average grid-supplied domestic electricity price: $0.35/kWh!
Peak Power/Type Field Plant
Partially Integrated
Fully Integrated(BIPV)
[kW] [USD/kWh] [USD/kWh] [USD/kWh]1 -‐ 3 kW 0.53 0.58 0.65
3 kW to 20 kW 0.50 0.56 0.61 > 20 kW 0.48 0.53 0.58
Grid connection Upto 31.12.2010
2010 Feed-in Tariff
4/9/11
11
(c) Saifur Rahman 21
Spain: Feed-‐In Tariffs
- Retroactive reduction in “subsidies” in 2010 - Average grid-supplied domestic electricity price: $0.19/kWh
(c) Saifur Rahman 22
Asia Incentives/Policies for Renewable Energy
4/9/11
12
(c) Saifur Rahman 23
India: Feed-‐In Tariffs (Launched -‐ 2009)
Cost plus profit model: Examples: West Bengal: Solar PV @ $0.25/kWh; PPA for 15 years Haryana: Solar PV @ $0.34/kWh; PPA for 5 years Rajasthan: Solar PV @ $0.35/kWh; CSP @ $0.31/kWh Tamil Nadu: CSP @ $0.27/kWh; Wind @ $0.08/kWh Average grid-supplied domestic electricity price: $0.08/kWh
(c) Saifur Rahman 24
China: Feed-‐In Tariffs
- Wind tariffs based on resource intensity $0.08–0.09/kWh - Average grid-supplied domestic electricity price: $0.05/kWh
Roof-‐top $ 2.26/WattBIPV $3.01/Watt
Grid-‐connected 50% of total project costOff-‐grid 70% of total project cost
FIT for Solar PV -‐ 2010 Auction-‐based price discovery
BIPV capital subsidy (> 50 kW): 2009-‐2011 -‐ PHASING OUT
Golden Sun capital subsidy (> 300 kW): 2009-‐2011 -‐ PHASING OUT
4/9/11
13
(c) Saifur Rahman 25
Japan: Feed-‐In Tariffs
Residential Solar - “Net" feed-in tariff - A variant of net-metering where only excess generation receives payment
- Term: 15-20 years - Average grid-supplied domestic electricity price: $0.23/kWh
Year 2009(USD/kWh)
Year 2010(USD/kWh)
Rooftop PV -‐ "Net" FIT 0.58 0.58Large scale PV 0.29 0.29Wind -‐ 0.17
(c) Saifur Rahman 26
Thailand: Feed-‐In Tariffs (Launched 2006)
Avoided cost + Premium (called an “adder”):
- Total FIT = 0.12 +0.34 = $0.46/kwh - Average grid-supplied domestic electricity price: $0.12/kWh
Energy Source
AdderAdditional for
diesel offsetting areas
Additional for 3
southern provinces
Duration(Years)
Wind [USD/kWh] [USD/kWh] [USD/kWh] <= 50 kW 0.13 0.05 0.05 10 > 50 kW 0.10 0.05 0.05 10 Solar 0.24 0.05 0.05 10
4/9/11
14
(c) Saifur Rahman 27
Feed-‐In Tariffs – Best Prac;ces - Payments based on the cost of generation
- Payments differentiated by technology type, project size, location, and resource quality
- Contracts are based on lifetime of the project - Policy stability is as important to investors as initial price
- Clear interconnection rules and cost allocation procedures (e.g. for T&D)
- Larger projects need to provide daily/hourly forecasts to facilitate grid balancing
Source: NREL, “A Policymaker’s Guide to FIT Policy Design”
(c) Saifur Rahman
Key Market Strategies
n Price Support/Policies • Tax Subsidies • Min Fixed Payment Prices • Mandates (Renewable Portfolio Standards)
n Cost Reductions/Balance of Systems
n New Technologies
4/9/11
15
(c) Saifur Rahman 29
Thank You
Saifur Rahman
Email: [email protected]
www.SaifurRahman.org